perverts British justice and a judiciary failing our children and a mass media who promotes a homosexual lifestyle.

12 depraved homosexual paedophiles who abused over 90 boys released early

THESE are the dregs of Britain's vilest paedophile gang, freed EARLY and on the loose. Twelve of the pervert ring were convicted for a catologue of appalling rapes and attacks on young boys that shocked the entire country. They preyed on at least 90 victims But 10 years on, hidden among unsuspecting families, many of the gang are still IN TOUCH. Two even LIVE together.

We found cocky ALAN TANNER - jailed for nine years - at a semi in Somerset, where he bragged: "Life's pretty easy now. My movements aren't restricted and it's no big deal." Chillingly Tanner, 70, added: "I still see Tony Stevens (one of the ringleaders). He brings his mum round for dinner."

Not far away we discovered another ringleader CHRIS LEEK - jailed 12 years for serious sex assaults and supplying heroin. His Bristol house was the honeypot, kitted out with the latest computers and games to attract youngsters. The gang lured kids from school bus queues, plied them with booze and drugs then pounced. Leek now lives with his mum in a detached barn and moaned that neighbours had no right to know his sickening history. "If my past gets out it's over for me here," he whined. Partners in crime BRIAN GREENROYD and PETER CLARKE are still in Bristol and share a flat.

Greenroyd, now in his 60s, has a history of sex offences - including the rape of a 10-year-old girl. He was jailed 17 months for indecently assaulting a 15-year-old boy in the 1999 scandal. Flatmate Clarke was sentenced to three years for five indecent assaults. Back in Somerset, close to a children's nursery, we discovered paedophile KEVIN WARFIELD trying to keep his history quiet. He got eight years for illegal sex acts, gross indecency and indecent assault, but served just six.

"No one here knows about my past," he told us. "I was abused myself at nine. It doesn't excuse what I did but helps me explain it. I've tried to turn my life around." Henchman TONY STEVENS, 54 - known as Fat Tony and sentenced to eight years - is back in Bristol. An elderly woman at his house claimed she had never heard of him, but his solicitor confirmed he IS at the address. Our probe did unearth one piece of good news. Pervert GERALD WILKINS, convicted on two counts of indecent assault, is now out of circulation. At his house in Somerset a neighbour described him as "a nasty piece of work" who had been moved to a nursing home after "losing his mind".

Whenever the N.O.W. alerts the public to the danger of predatory paedophiles in their midst, apologists leap to their defence claiming they can change their ways. But a source close to the original police investigation insisted last night: "The evidence was truly horrifying and no matter what these men say they will ALWAYS be a danger."

    brian spillane MOLESTING girls in the confessional box and raping hypnotised boys was part of a pattern of "rampant pedophilia" by a former priest accused of sexually assaulting youngsters, a Sydney court has been told.

    Brian Joseph Spillane, a former chaplain at St Stanislaus College in Bathurst, faced Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court today over a raft of new sexual assault charges.

    He has been charged with an additional 29 counts of indecently assaulting 11 males and females, bringing the total number of charges against the former priest to 146. In unsuccessfully opposing bail for the 66-year-old, crown prosecutor Beth Walker said the crown's case "presents the picture of rampant pedophilia'' and contended Mr Spillane posed a risk of flight and reoffending.

    Ms Walker said Mr Spillane sexually assaulted both boys and girls between 1971 and 1990 during his time at both St Stanislaus boys' school in NSW's central west and St Anthony's parish at Marsfield, in Sydney's north. She said a former teacher at St Stanislaus had told authorities of "group sex that he observed in the shower block'' and "sexual assault to a number of students''. Mr Spillane is accused of serious offences including anal intercourse and group rape at the Bathurst boarding school, Ms Walker said.

    Teachers at St Stanislaus "hypnotised boys for the purpose of having sexual intercourse with them'', she told the court. Mr Spillane is also accused of indecently assaulting a number of girls, climbing into bed with them and simulating or attempting to have sex with them.

    The charges stem from investigations by Strike Force Belle, which looked into allegations of sexual and indecent assaults against students at two secondary colleges at Bathurst between 1960 and 1993. Magistrate Jane Culver granted bail with conditions including a $20,000 surety, that Mr Spillane reports to police daily and not involve himself with any activities that bring him into contact with children under 16. He is due to next face the same court on November 20.

    presidential whores
  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
    gay police association

    This is the biggest and growing threat to heterosexual fathers and their families. Cops regularly throw men onto the street and destroy their lives through family court orders that allow these evil bastards to take control of our children for their own ends.

    What is going on in the UK and worldwide is sinister, EVIL and satanic in its origins . None more so than the masons ,gays and transvestites re-writing the police code with only their agenda at the top of the list. For far to long heterosexual mens lives have been utterly abused by the filth now masquerading as coppers.

    And if you thought WPCs in burqas were ridiculous

    When it was reported that three soppy policewomen in Sheffield had kitted themselves out in full burqas and gone shopping, so they could empathise with fundamentalist Muslims, I thought I'd heard it all. I should have known better. For years, this column has ridiculed the lunatic obsession of the police with the 'diversity' agenda. But this barking stunt was the most absurd example yet. It came only a week after we learned that there is now a Pagan Police Association, to stand alongside the Gay Police Association, the Black Police Association and a raft of other special interest pressure groups.

    As I wrote at the time, police officers should be defined by the uniform they wear, not the colour of their skin, their sexual inclination or their religious beliefs. The politics of identity is anathema to the smooth running of any organisation, serving only to foster a culture of division, grievance, permanent unrest and opportunism. Every time I bring you one of these stories, I wonder where it will all end. Now I discover that there's a National Trans Police Association, too.

    According to its website: 'The NTPA exists primarily to provide support to serving and retired police officers, police staff and special constables with any gender identity issue, including, but not exclusively, Trans men, Trans women, people who identify as Transgender, androgyne or intersex, and people who cross dress. 'The NTPA further aims to provide support to all serving and retired police officers, police staff and special constables who are dealing with people with a gender identity issue, whether that person is a colleague, family member or a member of the public involved in a police matter.' Note the 'but not exclusively'. You might have thought that any outfit encompassing transgendered, androgyny and intersexuals ( whatever the hell they are) had pretty much covered the waterfront.

    The roll call of those eligible sounds like a contestant signing off after winning Ken Bruce's Pop-Master, rattling through a list of names before adding, breathlessly, 'and anyone else who knows me'. The criteria is so widely drawn that, theoretically, it could also include centaurs, who are currently under-represented in the ranks of the Old Bill. They would be welcomed into the mounted branch and could cut costs by 50 per cent by saving on the need for both an officer and a horse. If the legendary band Half Man, Half Biscuit ever decide to turn their backs on the rock and roll lifestyle, a whole new career in law enforcement awaits.

    The NTPA made its public debut at the recent Sparkle 09 festival in Manchester's Gay Village, where it set up a mobile police station handing out leaflets and balloons. There are some very fetching photos on its website. Curiously, the events coordinator for the NTPA is called Bernie Clifton. Could this be the same Bernie Clifton who made his name as a comedian by dressing up as an ostrich and charging around like a headless chicken? I'm assuming it's not him, but you never know. Actually, if it is the same Bernie Clifton, he will probably soon have his own association for people who like to dress up as ostriches.

    There appears to be no limit to the number of obscure subcategories the police can split themselves into. The Trans Police Association is already recognised and supported by both the Association of Chief Police Officers and the National Policing Improvement Agency. An application for Home Office funding is sure to follow and is almost certain to be granted. It can be only a matter of time before a transsexual officer sues for discrimination after being turned down for promotion or demands that the police funds his gender reassignment surgery.

    No doubt I'll be accused of stirring up 'transphobic' hatred. For the record, I have no more objection to transvestites forming a club than I do to philatelic societies. But it should be done in their own time and not at public expense. I acknowledge that some people have gender ishoos and are entitled to understanding. But the job of the police is to prevent crime, maintain public order and catch villains. Full stop.

    Recruitment and promotion should be solely on the basis of ability, not race, religion, gender or sexual proclivity. Everyone ought to be treated equally. There is no place for officially-recognised, politically-motivated, single-issue lobby groups. The time, money and effort wasted pandering to minorities with an exaggerated sense of entitlement is scandalous - especially when chief constables are whining they haven't got the resources to keep police stations open and put bobbies on the beat. Burqas were barmy enough. And though I hesitate to tempt fate, at this rate it won't be long before a cross- dressing copper complains that his stockings and suspenders are chafing under his blue serge uniform and insists on being allowed to go on patrol in a leather mini-skirt and an Amy Winehouse wig. Mind how you go.

  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
    transvestite cops

    Dressed in matching black t-shirts and handing out balloons, these are trans-gender members of the National Trans Police Association. They were pictured at the recent Sparkle 09 festival in Manchester's Gay Village in a bid to encourage the trans community to report more incidents to the police.

    Members of the National Trans Police Association and Greater Manchester Police take part in 'Sparkle' festival in Manchester But the association has sparked allegations of misuse of taxpayers' money after it emerged that the group may receive public funding. As the Mail's Richard Littlejohn revealed yesterday, the Trans Police Association is already recognised and supported by both the Association of Chief Police Officers and the National Policing Improvement Agency.

    A representative of the National Trans Police Association meets sex-change community members in Manchester Its website says it represents and provides support to serving and retired Police Officers, Police Staff and Special Constables with any gender identity issues 'including, but not exclusively, Trans men, Trans women, people who are Transgender, androgyne or intersex and people who cross dress'. But Tory MP Philip Davies, speaking to The Express, slammed the use of taxpayers' money to fund the group and accused the police of being 'institutionally politically correct'.

    He said: 'I don’t care if a police officer is gay, straight, trans-gender or whatever, I just want them to catch criminals. If they get any funds out of taxpayers’ income, that would be completely and utterly unacceptable. Everyone a few years ago said the police were institutionally racist. Now they are institutionally politically correct.' According to the website, the NTPA was set up after a meeting at the police staff college at Bramshill in Hampshire.

    Mike Cunningham, who was Deputy Chief Constable of Lancashire Police at the time, was heavily involved in its formation and was responsible for dealing with lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and trans-gender issues for the Association of Chief Police Officers. The websites states that Mr Cunningham decided to split the portfolio because trans people’s ­primary issue 'is about gender and not their sexuality'. The Home Office, however, said the group had not received any public funding.

  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
    For centuries the Masonic central bankers who control Western society and culture have been pushing "tolerance." Why?

    "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a notorious "forgery" that uncannily explains the reason. It says the Illuminati bankers want to "dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us." (Protocols, Section 5) The four major collective forces are: Race, Religion, Family and Nation. They are the four pillars of our human identity.

    How do you undermine them? Certainly a frontal attack would meet with spirited resistance. Instead you promote "tolerance" which destroys these collective forces by erasing the differences between them. Thus you have ecumenism in religion, miscegenation in race, and regionalism (i.e. EU, NAU) in nation states. You destroy family by erasing gender differences. "Tolerance" (and "human rights") are Orwellian doublespeak for a process that demolishes the foundations of human identity. Human beings are being re-engineered to be servants, cattle, "human resource" of the Cabalist bankers. We are being deliberately stunted and diverted, destined to be dysfunctional children who don't decide or do anything important but work, have sex and consume. Mankind is satanically possessed, hijacked by a Satanic cult, the Illuminati bankers.


    "Tolerance" is applied selectively. We must tolerate whatever undermines the four collective forces but have "zero tolerance" for efforts to resist or uphold them. Tolerance for Rothschild shills; zero tolerance for everyone else. Thus Black rappers can trash Black females but Don Imus was fired for a passing remark. Zero tolerance for white heterosexual Christians. Gay activists can plot the end of "hetero-normative" society but the EU censors Poland for "hate" because it doesn't allow public schools to promote homosexuality.

    American Zionists can instigate disastrous wars, but the EU declares illegal any scrutiny of the Jewish holocaust, which might deprive Zionists of their impunity. The truth can withstand scrutiny. I will focus on one aspect of this agenda: the attempt by the American Psychological Association to suppress therapies that help homosexuals assume a heterosexual life. In our "tolerant" world, homosexuals are tolerated unless they become heterosexuals again.


    In the one-race, one-religion, one-world government, we are to have one sex as well. The bankers are creating a homosexual society by confusing us about gender and sexuality. (This confusion is called "Diversity." ) In 1973 the Rockefellers had the American Psychological Association change the definition of homosexual from a disorder to a normal lifestyle choice. If you google, "Rockefeller Foundation" and the APA, you will get about 70,000 links, indicative of how the bankers buy "scientists" and other "professionals" by the tonne.

    Some psychologists protested this banker takeover. One was Ray Johnson, who wrote that the APA "has been seized by political activists who have little regard for science or the democratic process. Since the seventies, the American Psychological Association has lobbied the government, filed court briefs, and engaged in and promoted boycotts on behalf of ..the ERA, unrestricted abortion (including abortion for children without parental notification and consent), sex and racial-ethnic discrimination, and homosexual politics." The APA is lobbying to have homosexuals declared "a protected minority." It engages in intimidation and propaganda. It threatened with boycotts "states whose citizens passed APA disapproved laws regarding homosexuality. It has supported efforts to introduce programs into the public schools to "reduce prejudice" aimed at so-called "gay, lesbian and bisexual youth" or "pre-homosexual" children."

    Does this sound like "tolerance" to you? The APA is vehemently against "conversion therapy" because they can't have homosexuals reverting to heterosexuality. That implies something is wrong with homosexuality! In 1979 the noted sex therapists Masters and Johnson published their findings that 72% of dissatisfied homosexuals who entered their program converted to satisfied heterosexuals, based on follow-up five years later. Immediately the APA attack hounds condemned their methodology and claimed the men weren't really homosexuals. The careers of the sex therapists went into eclipse. Only in a Masonic Communist system like our own is science determined by politics.


    To understand our world, we must appreciate that we are frogs in a large pot, having our identities changed. Our "culture" -- the pot and the stove -- is largely contrived, i.e. it is social engineering. Only "approved" statements get mass distribution, Mankind is being transformed to serve the Cabalist bankers. They want us to identify as consumers and producers only, and be amenable to guidance by "experts", like the APA. "Tolerance" shames us into giving up our humanity. Let's resist by strengthening our identities: heterosexuality, nation, religion and race, respecting but not deferring to others. The real tolerance does not come from erasing differences but in upholding them, in loving others for their unique qualities, and being proud of our own.

  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
    Malta's Gay Mafia to the Rescue

    Anonymous sources tell Malta Gay News that a new and powerful social clique that they referred to as Malta’s very own Gay Mafia” has been organizing. Sources say that “this “gay mafia” is not some truly devious alliance ruling either an industry or our politics. The name is more good-humored than subversive. A few influential individuals are joining forces in support of gay rights in politics and the media. Quoting the New York Press: "Truth is, many gay men will tell you that there most certainly is a gay mafia-using that term or its synonym, "the velvet mafia"-whether or not they are members themselves.” On an international level, “It’s made up of men such as DreamWorks co-chair David Geffen and Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner, plus many more well-known and lesser-known individuals. They are men of a certain status who travel together, throw swanky parties and introduce young beautiful things to one another.”

    Europe has various “gay mafia” families, as they are often called, and they are “no different from the straight male mafia in Hollywood, where the casting couch for actresses is practically an institution.” David Ehrenstein, author of Open Secret: Gay Hollywood 1928-1998 (William Morrow, 1998) is quoted as saying that "It’s a social thing." Nonetheless members of the “gay mafia” in Malta have a clear agenda on how, in the coming years, they will be wielding their influence, from behind the scenes, on various aspects of the political and economic stage. One source says that “Malta’s gay mafia is not just about parties and socialising, it has developed a plan! If the plan works Malta will be a much better place for homosexuals. They have a long term plan that will require dedication and money. With the help of personal connections they have a clear strategy that aims to influence change at the social, political and legal levels.”

    We asked our source whether they feel that the gay mafia is realistically strong enough to effect change. Their answer “Who knows, all I know is that some have incredibly deep pockets and are ready to die trying.” Our “invisibility” propagates the cycle of oppression and can only change once people high on the social scale start to come out. As wealthy people, the educated elite, artists, entertainers and politicians, for example, come-out, then we can recognize this as a sign that things are changing for the better for GLBT in Malta.

    The connection between status and social influence is evident in the prevalence of celebrity endorsements. A strategy that relies on the principle of copying the successful behaviours of others is a very popular choice, particularly for advertisers; more than ten percent of television advertising includes celebrity endorsement. This form of advertising is popular because it is successful, and it is successful because humans are especially attuned to high-status individuals, and are more likely to learn from them (to adopt their advice) than from others. Often status or prestige is a valuable signal that someone is worth paying attention to. In the big picture we can now see that the gay community in Malta is finally organizing and they now have at least 3 representational faces that are often discussed in the news; the Malta Gay Rights Movement which often chooses to maintain a neutral intonation, the Malta Gay Exiles which gives a voice to immigrants and local homosexuals facing an archaic immigration policy and the Gay Mafia which prefers to act from behind the scenes, wielding is power through its influential members and financial stability.

  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
    by Henry Makow Ph.D.

    Millions of young people say, "That's so gay" to denote alien, different and unhealthy. To me, this is the most hopeful sign that Western civilization will survive. For Rockefeller-Rothschild social engineers, however, it's a disaster.

    These youths are not getting the message that gay and straight are essentially the same, i.e. "lifestyle preferences" like cable or satellite. So these Cabalist bankers have launched an expensive "public service" TV campaign to indoctrinate kids that obeying their healthy instincts, is in fact being "homophobic." They've got celebrities like lesbian comedian Wanda Sykes and Hillary Duff overhearing teenagers, interrupting them and chewing them out. "How would you like it if your identity was used to denote alien and wrong?"


    Every first-year anthropology student learns that group cohesion is maintained by defining in-group and out-group behavior. If a group cannot define itself, it disappears. You're not being homophobic. This TV campaign is a rearguard action in a war on your sexual identity. Gay Pride is apparently OK but heterosexuals cannot maintain their identity. I'm here to tell you, "Bend over no more." Until 1975, homosexuality was considered a developmental disorder. Therapists considered it a major neurosis, a sexual perversion and even a physical illness. Then the Rockefellers yanked the chain of the American Psychological Association and magically, overnight, what for centuries had been abnormal, was suddenly normal.

    This is part of a larger attack on gender and marriage designed to decrease population and undermine the family. In the bankers' Brave New World Order, children will be born to single mothers and raised by the state. They will be "educated" to serve their betters. Do you really think the Rockefellers, who financed Eugenics for a century, including Mengele's heinous experiments in Auschwitz, give a hoot about homosexuals' feelings? No, they are trying to turn you into homosexuals. They want you to suffer from this disorder. That's why you are learning in school that homosexuality is normal! That's why they are using guilt to rob you of your heterosexual identity. This isn't about equality and human rights. It is about social engineering and mind control. It's about depopulation and dictatorship.

    In 2002, a Mormon girl was ribbed by her new classmates. "Do you have ten moms?" To which she replied, "That's so gay." Those three words landed her in big trouble. See how selective this is? Why can a Christians' feelings be hurt, but not a gay person's? Because they are not promoting tolerance. They are not promoting Christianity. They are promoting homosexuality. The organization behind the ads, GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, has 40 full-time employees! They sponsor pro- gay propaganda in thousands of schools under the pretense that gay youth are being persecuted. The Rockefeller Foundation is paying.


    Wake up heterosexuals, wars always operate under the pretext of self-defence. Heterosexuality is under attack. You are being persecuted. Your mind is messed with so you will adopt unhealthy behavior which will rob you of your ability to marry and procreate. For course, gay youths should be treated with kindness and consideration. It's not their fault they are gay. They are not conscious of how they are being used by the Rockefellers. But draw a line in the sand. They are not the same as we are and we have a right to say so.


    Our society has been subverted by Cabalist bankers, including many homosexuals, who have stolen the governments' credit card, and now have to create a dictatorship to protect their prize. They are behind all wars, depression, 9-11 and the credit crunch. These are ways to degrade and demoralize humanity so we will accept their tyranny. Instead of thinking of homosexuality in terms of same-sex attraction, thinking of it as gender confusion resulting in "failure to permanently bond with (i.e. marry) a member of the opposite sex." Homosexuals generally compensate for this failure by having promiscuous sex. Can you see how, in these terms, heterosexuals have become like homosexuals? Courtship is almost dead. Anonymous sex ("hooking up") is in.

    Heterosexuality is not a "lifestyle preference." Heterosexuality is being part of the natural life cycle that is essential to personal development, happiness and the survival of the species. A country that cares about its survival would foster courtship, marriage and family. Children need the security and love of heterosexual parents in a strong marriage. A country that has been subverted by an alien occult financial power allows its young men and women to be lied to and perverted. Its politicians, media and educators do not serve the people. They work for the alien financial power. Here is what a nurse says about "the gay lifestyle."

    They foster the illusion that gays are just like us, interested in marriage. In Holland and Sweden where gays are allowed to have civil unions, less than 3% do. The same is true of Canada. The Rothschilds and Rockefellers want you to behave like most gays. They want you to have sex but no family. They own the world and we are "useless eaters."


    So on Father's Day, let's celebrate heterosexuality. Let's celebrate marriage and children. Let's celebrate men who support and lead their families, and women who sacrifice for husband and children.

    And to the Rockefellers' and Rothschilds' commercials, let's say, "That's so gay!"


    People who have concerns about the adoption of children by gay couples are 'retarded homophobes', the state-funded national adoption agency said yesterday. Those who protest over controversial gay adoption laws are merely 'whinging', according to the British Association for Adoption and Fostering. Its insulting description angered senior MPs and former Cabinet Ministers, Roman Catholic and Church of England leaders.

    It also offended disability campaigners, who have been trying to discourage the use of the word 'retarded' for years. Whitehall has banned the word for civil servants. New row: The British Association for Adoption and Fostering told would-be gay adopters to not worry about society - 'any critics are retarded homophobes' Many of those who are worried about gay adoption say that approving same-sex relationships goes against their Christian faith. Mike Judge, of the Christian Institute thinktank, said last night: 'Christians are tired of being marginalised.

    'We don't expect everyone to agree with us but organisations such as the BAAF should try to avoid this kind of language.' Tory MP Julian Brazier, co-chairman of the all-party Commons group on adoption and fostering, said: 'I work with BAAF all the time and I know how much they bring to adoption. Disappointed: Tory MP Julian Brazier is 'very sad' the BAAF used language such as 'retarded homophobes' 'I must say I am very sad that they should use this language about people who have an honest disagreement with them.' Author Patricia Morgan, who has published a study of gay adoption, said: 'It is disgraceful that they do not wish to discuss the pros and cons of gay adoption. They just go in for abuse. They do not appear interested in evidence about the outcomes for children. And it is a disgusting phrase to use.' The British Association for Adoption and Fostering sets rules and organises training for social workers across the country.

    Every local council with a children's services department is a paying member of the organisation, and the bulk of its £6million-a-year budget comes from the taxpayer. It runs the national adoption register for the Department of Children, Schools and Families. The 'retarded homophobe' attack was published in a BAAF guide to adoption for homosexual couples. It was repeated in its newspaper Be My Parent, which advertises children who need homes. Would-be gay adopters were told: 'Most importantly, don't worry about society. 'Children need good parents much more than retarded homophobes need an excuse to whinge, so don't let your worries about society's reaction hinder your desire and ability to give a child a loving caring home.'

    BAAF's Pink Guide to Adoption for Lesbians and Gay Men was written by Nicola Hill, a former Guardian journalist and charity worker. She is featured as a writer on the website of the literary agency Creative Authors Ltd which states she is also the author of A Very Pink Wedding: A Gay Guide To Planning Your Perfect Day. She also co-founded the website gay-friendly-wedding-venues.com. The London School of Economics graduate lives in London with her partner Laura McCaffrey. Together they run a freelance editorial service. The guide was launched at a BAAF conference this week aimed at 'overcoming resistance - celebrating the role of lesbian and gay carers'. The meeting discussed 'what lesbian and gay carers can offer to the adoption and fostering process and how agencies can facilitate their contribution'.

    Those attending were also told that 'we will confront the challenges that such initiatives may provoke to established attitudes and assumptions'. The BAAF's protective attitude to gay couples appears to differ from the way it deals with other people.

    Watch your language: The 'retarded homophobe' attack was published in BAAF's Pink Guide to Adoption for Lesbians and Gay Men The organisation strongly supports the legal requirement that the perceived interests of children are paramount and the wishes of would-be parents are of minor importance. It insists that children go to homes only of adoptive parents of the same race. It questions would-be adoptive couples about their views on race and says ' vigorous efforts are made to find a family that reflects the child's individual identity'. Couples who wish to adopt are often rejected because social workers consider them too old or overweight, or because they smoke. Some have even been judged to be 'too middle class'.

    Until Tony Blair's 2002 Adoption Act, children could be adopted only by married couples or single people. The new law made it possible for unmarried and gay couples to adopt. Mr Blair argued that the reform would increase the proportion of the 60,000 children in state care who win new families through adoption. But the numbers have actually fallen. Since 2004, adoptions from care have dropped from 3,800 a year to 3,200.

    The great majority of those are white children. Black children are missing out because there is a shortage of black couples wishing to adopt, yet social workers oppose sending them to non-black families. There were just 30 adoptions by gay couples and 50 by lesbian couples last year. There have been setbacks to the cause of gay parenting.

    In 2006, gay foster parents Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey were jailed for paedophile offences against boys at their home in Pontefract, West Yorkshire. The couple had been the first gay foster parents in Yorkshire. An inquiry found social workers had regarded them as 'trophy carers' and failed to respond to signs of abuse because they feared being accused of discrimination. Gay adoption provoked a major political row in 2007 when Labour's Sexual Orientation Regulations made it unlawful for adoption agencies to refuse to help gay prospective parents. Opponents of the move included Cabinet Minister Ruth Kelly, the senior Roman Catholic leaders in England and former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey.

    Earlier this year there was a fierce controversy when a Scottish couple said they were warned they would never see their two grandchildren again unless they dropped their opposition to them being adopted by a gay couple. For two years, they fought for their rights to care for the little boy and girl whose 26-year-old mother, the couple's daughter, is a recovering heroin addict. They finally agreed to an adoption but were shocked to be told the children were going to a gay household.

    When the grandfather protested, he said he was told: 'You can either accept it, and there's a chance you'll see them twice a year, or you can take that stance and never see them again.' The word 'retarded' has been considered unacceptable for some years. Advice on 'disability etiquette' distributed to civil servants says it must be avoided in all circumstances. A spokesman for the British Institute for Learning Disabilities said: 'We have not used the term for at least ten years. It is not acceptable to us.' Comedian Russell Brand was strongly criticised in the U.S. last year for calling George Bush a 'retarded cowboy'.

  • BAAF is pandering to militant homosexual propagandists
    strachan ring

    Eight members of a paedophile ring were found guilty today of a catalogue of child pornography and abuse charges, including the sexual assault of a three-month old baby. The ringleaders - convicted sex offender Neil Strachan and gay rights campaigner James Rennie - were convicted of sex attacks on children. Strachan, 41, and Rennie, 38, both from Edinburgh, were also found guilty of conspiring to abuse youngsters, as were three other members of the gang.

    All eight accused in the 10-week trial at the High Court in Edinburgh were convicted of a series of child porn offences. The gang members were traced through their explicit internet chats about sexual fantasies involving children. From various locations across Scotland, they plotted, whether by using web cameras or other means such as by phone, to participate in sexual offences, including rape and sodomy. The jury - down to 14 men and women after one member was discharged during the trial - took 10 hours over two days to reach its verdicts. The court fell silent as the succession of verdicts to more than 50 charges were given. Nearly 125,000 indecent images were seized during Operation Algebra, which uncovered the group, believed to be Scotland's biggest paedophile network. Ross Webber, 27, of North Berwick, Craig Boath, 24, from Dundee and John Milligan, 40, from Glasgow, were all found guilty of conspiring to participate in the sexual abuse of children along with Strachan and Rennie. The five men, with Colin Slaven, 23, from Edinburgh and Neil Campbell, 46 and John Murphy, 44, from Glasgow, were also convicted of a catalogue of child porn offences.

    But the undisputed ringleaders of the ring were Strachan and Rennie, who on the surface held down good jobs and were trusted members of the community. But the pair had a shared interest in young boys and had collected some of the worst child abuse images ever seen by police experts. They were also responsible for the abuse of very young children - one as young as three months old. Rennie was the successful chief executive of LGBT Youth Scotland, an organisation dedicated to helping young gay people. A former secondary school teacher, he regularly spoke out in public on gay issues, particularly how they affected young people.

    But the High Court in Edinburgh heard he was 'polluted by deviant compulsion'. Crown QC Dorothy Bain said: 'In reality he is someone who allowed his profound interest in the sexual abuse of children to engulf his entire life.'

    The extent of his obsession with under-age sex unfolded as the 10-week trial progressed. He was charged and ultimately convicted of molesting a child over a number of years, starting at the age of three months. And in an online conversation with another accused, he even expressed a wish to see children with Down's Syndrome or a learning disability sexually abused. Operation Algebra officers found that Rennie had links with paedophiles in the US and the Netherlands. He was traced and arrested by police at the end of 2007. He was suspended from his high-profile post and by February 2008 had resigned.

    Strachan also hid a dark past, in which he was jailed for three years for molesting a young boy. He was the man who sparked Operation Algebra when indecent images were found on computer equipment used by him in his work. Tests revealed 'sinister' emails between him and Rennie. They had encountered each other online in 2004 when Strachan congratulated Rennie on the content of his web page on a site known to have been misused by paedophiles. When the case came to trial, what the jury did not know was that Strachan had offended before. He was jailed for three years in 1997 for repeatedly molesting a young boy while he was an official at a youth football club. He started abusing the child when he was five years old and the abuse went on for two years. Strachan quit his post as secretary of Celtic East Boys Club in Edinburgh after he was caught.

    When he was jailed, it emerged that he had also been convicted of a similar sex offence 12 years previously. Among the charges faced by Strachan in the current trial was an allegation that he committed a serious sexual offence against a toddler at New Year from 2005 into 2006. But Strachan, despite being one of the worst offenders in the group, was the only one of the eight men on trial who denied every charge against him. Prosecutors were forced to piece together the case against him bit by bit. Crucial to their case was a photograph partially showing a man sexually assaulting a young child. The Crown called on a world-renowned expert in human anatomy to examine the picture, known in court as The Hogmanay Image. Pinpointing the abuser's physical traits, including a distinctive thumbnail, Professor Susan Black said there was 'strong evidence' that Strachan and the man in the picture were the same person.

  • Evil homopaedo LGBT pervert abuse ring eight jailed long term(VIDEO)
    Former Pc jailed over boy abuse

    A former police officer has been jailed for two-and-a-half years after admitting four counts of sexual activity with a 15-year-old boy. Mark Brigham was serving with the Metropolitan Police when the incident took place in Portsmouth, in 2008. The victim's family asked Brigham, a lesbian and gay liaison officer, for advice after their son came out as homosexual, the court heard. The 38-year-old, from Hackney, east London, had resigned from the force. He had been suspended pending the case.

    Portsmouth Crown Court was told that Brigham, a police constable for nine years, had attended a party last August where he befriended the boy. The off-duty officer had been asked to talk with the boy to offer advice.
    You had received some warning of his age but you succumbed to temptation and committed these offences says Judge Roger Hetherington

    But, the court heard, they performed consensual sex acts on each other. Matthew Lawson, prosecuting, said that Brigham had described his victim as "stunning" to other people at the party during the evening but had been informed that the boy was only 15-years-old. He added that after the party, Brigham kept in contact with the boy through text messages and through the Facebook internet site. The boy later told his family what had happened.

    The hearing was told that Brigham had been going through a number of personal issues at the time including the break up of a relationship and had large debts. Sentencing Brigham, Judge Roger Hetherington, said: "The offences are aggravated by the disparity of age between the two of you - you were more than twice his age. "You were someone he could expect to look up to and expect some guidance from." Brigham was jailed, ordered to sign on the sex offenders register for an indefinite period and banned from working with children. Speaking after the hearing, Det Con Dave Anderson, of Hampshire police, said: "It's a sad end to an officer's career but also it will give some finalisation for the victim."

    by Henry Makow Ph.D.

    If I were a lawyer, I'd make a specialty of suing the nine Canadian provinces and 15 States that allow same-sex adoption. My clients would be young adults whose lives were destroyed because these jurisdictions ignored their innate heterosexuality. I would wager that this arrogant flouting of natural laws will require hundreds of millions in restitution. Google "coming out" and compare the resources available to young would-be homosexuals with the callous indifference to innocent heterosexual children who don't have necessary heterosexual role models and don't know what's wrong.

    The most outrageous example of this Bolshevik denial of gender differences is the story of David Reimer who was raised as a girl because his genitals were deformed in a botched circumcision. This undeclared war on heterosexuals is designed to destabilize society in advance of the New World Order. The destruction of the nuclear family has long been the Illuminati Communist goal. They wish to make arrested development (homosexuality) the new normal. Lesbianism is the hidden agenda of feminism. Marriage and family are essential to our natural development. Despite the deceitful propaganda, most male homosexuals don't want marriage or children. They want sex.

    Because this is the Agenda, the research on same-sex parenting is highly politicized. Thus, we have numerous nonsensical claims that homosexual parenting is as good for the child or better than heterosexual. Here is a study that actually claims that more than half of gay men want to have children. It says that in 2007, an estimated two million GLB people were interested in adopting. An estimated 65,500 adopted children were living with a lesbian or gay parent. More than 16,000 adopted children are living with lesbian and gay parents in California, the highest number among the states. Gay and lesbian parents are raising four percent of all adopted children in the United States. I'm not saying that none of these parents have merit. I am saying that it is wrong to place heterosexual children with homosexual parents.


    Perhaps it is too soon to hear from the victims of same-sex placements. But a young woman, Dawn Stefanowicz, whose father was a homosexual has published a book, "Out from Under-The Impact of Homosexual Parenting." I haven't read it but a review by Real Women of Canada indicates her father, who died of AIDS in 1991, acted as expected: [Her father] failed utterly in protecting and affirming her both as a person, and as a woman. Instead her father, who was himself the product of a drunken abusive father and who was sexually and physically abused many times as a child, spent his entire life looking for a father figure himself who would love, affirm and attend to him. That is, he longed for and sought to obtain male companionship and love through his gay lifestyle to meet his own emotional needs. In so doing, he failed to provide attention and affection for his wife and children who were left to cope alone. Unfortunately, Dawn's mother was an ineffective and submissive person who was overwhelmed with her own neediness, and did little to help her children in their agony.

    Dawn's father brought a succession of lovers into the home where his sexual acts were often carried out and which Dawn sometimes witnessed...Dawn was forced by her father to watch sexually perverse and violent TV... The lesson learned from the book is that the homosexual demand for the "right" to adopt children or bring them into the same-sex relationship by way of medical technology on the basis that they are supposedly equally good parents as heterosexuals, is a fraud. Vulnerable children need both a father and a mother to love and protect them. They should not be used as instruments of social experimentation by narcissistic needy individuals who seek their sexual gratification and their identities outside the traditional family. (Reality, Jan-Feb. 2009, p 10) Although she is Canadian, the Canadian media has sandbagged her and her book in contrast to Conservative outlets in the US and Australia. The taxpayer-funded CBC spews pro same-sex parenting propaganda and is not expected to be "balanced." But Stefanowicz is expected to give the "other side of the story." It's a case of my belief is free speech and your belief is "hate."


    The most common type of same sex parenting is by two lesbians. Dr. Dean Byrd, a psychiatrist testified that the "research clearly demonstrated that lesbian mothers had a feminizing effect on their sons and a masculinizing effect on their daughters. Boys raised by lesbian mothers behaved in less traditionally masculine ways, and girls, particularly adolescent and young girls raised by lesbian mothers, appear to have been more sexually adventurous and less chaste." A picture is worth a thousand words. Look at Zack (left) a boy raised by two mommies.

    Dr. Byrd continued, "Children learn about male and female differences through parental modeling. The parental, mother-father relationship provides children with a model of marriage--the most meaningful, enduring relationship that the vast majority of individuals will have during their lives." Girls need their father's approval to affirm their femininity and to eventually bond with a man. Boys also need their father's example to grow into strong independent men capable of leading families. All of this the Bolshevik Masonic globalists are out to sabotage.

    Society is in the grip of a long-term satanic conspiracy masquerading as "progressive" which is attempting to concentrate all wealth in the hands of the central bankers and their allies. They are re-engineering the human race to serve them in a neo feudal world order. This is the real "hate" and we won't be fooled or coerced.

    ANN ARBOR, MI - The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, announced today that it's West Coast Director, Charles S. LiMandri, won a jury verdict on behalf of four Christian Firefighters who were subjected to sexual harassment in the 2007 San Diego so-called "gay-pride" parade.

    In July 2007, the four San Diego firefighters were ordered, against their wishes, to participate in uniform on their city fire engine in San Diego's annual "Gay Pride" parade. During the course of the ensuing three hour long ordeal, the firefighters were subjected to vile sexual taunts and gestures along the parade route. These firemen are devoted husbands and fathers. All four firemen are Christian men. Yesterday, shortly before 4:30 p.m. P.S.T., the jury found in favor of the four courageous Christian firefighters on all nine questions in the verdict form. This was the second time the case was tried in the past several months. The first trial ended in a hung jury.

    Charles S. LiMandri, West Coast Director of the Thomas More Law Center, stated, "This is a victory for all people who are willing to stand up for what is right when it comes to defending our basic freedoms of speech and religion. No one should be forced to be subjected to sexual harassment on the job - not even male heterosexual firefighters who are being harassed by homosexual men at a Gay Pride Parade. All city officials should now think twice before ever making such a wrongheaded decision to violate their employees' rights in such an improper manner again." On July 20, 2007, the four firefighters were told by their superiors that they would be participating in the parade. All four repeatedly protested that they did not wish to participate. On the morning of July 21, 2007, however, they were ordered to ride on a fire engine, in uniform, in the parade.

  • Firemen's Gay Pride Parade Trauma Back on Trial
    Lesbian couple accused of murder
    Dad blames social workers for son's death

    Four-year-old Jandre Botha refused to call his mother's lesbian lover "daddy" - and paid with his life. Jandre's father, Jan Botha, was in the Vereeniging regional court's public gallery on Wednesday when his former wife, Hanelie Botha, 31, and her partner, Engeline de Nysschen, 33, were found guilty of the gruesome murder of his son.

    He sat in court holding the hands of his fiance, Yolanda Deysel, and listened attentively to magistrate Rita Willemse, who, in her judgment, accepted evidence that among the reasons that led to Jandre's brutal ordeal was his refusal to call De Nysschen "daddy". The court had heard evidence from Lydia Nkomo and her daughter Aletta Lesiba, who worked for the couple in their tuckshop, that De Nysschen had viciously assaulted Jandre while demanding that he must call her "daddy".

    'His mother should have been aware of this'

    Both testified that while Jandre was assaulted, his mother failed to intervene or protect him. Evidence showed he had sustained horrific injuries, including a fractured skull and brain damage, as well as broken legs, collarbone, hands and pelvis. The court accepted the evidence of Professor Mohammed Dada, a trauma expert, who said the boy's injuries were similar to those of a person who had fallen from a double-storey building.

    Delivering judgment, Willemse acknowledged there was no substantial evidence linking Hanelie to the assaults, but said she was equally guilty of murder for failing in her legal duty to protect her child against abuse and violation. The court found she had lied to Dr Elna Gibson, one of the medical doctors who treated Jandre, by saying the boy obtained his injuries after he had slipped in the bath. The court ruled that she had lied to protect De Nysschen. The doctors who had examined Jandre dismissed the pair's version that he had slipped in the bath. They said excessive force was required to inflict the kind of fatal injuries sustained by Jandre.

    'She did nothing to protect her own child'

    Convicting the two, Willemse dismissed their version and said there was substantial medical evidence before her about the nature of the injuries suffered by Jandre. "I accept the evidence of the medical personnel who are experts in their fields. There were substantial documents placed before me. Most of them have medical experience which spans over a period of 15 years. "All of them have dismissed the version of the accused and were unanimous that the deceased's injuries were inflicted over a period of time.

    "It is unthinkable that the mother of the child could not have known about these fatal injuries. The deceased also had broken legs, and his mother should have been aware of this." The magistrate criticised Hanelie for failing to report Jandre's abuse at the hands of her lover to the social workers monitoring Jandre's progress, after she had gained custody of him during a lengthy court battle with her ex-husband. She also failed to report the abuse to her ex-husband. The boy's father became aware of Jandre's abuse only on the day of his death, June 12, 2003. De Nysschen contacted him and said Jandre had fallen earlier in the day and had died.

    Willemse criticised Hanelie's fitness to be a mother, saying her parents later approached her ex-husband and gave him financial help to fight for the custody of his child. Rebuking Hanelie, Willemse said: "Hanelie was not helpless. She was well aware of Engeline's violent outburst. "She could have called the child's father for help but she failed to do so. She did nothing to protect her own child."

    The magistrate labelled Engeline a liar and a hopeless witness who had contradicted herself in testimony. Hanelie and De Nysschen were further convicted of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm and child neglect for failing to provide or seek treatment for Jandre's limb fractures. The case was postponed until June 26 for a pre-sentencing report.

    Teen Anthony Stancl accused of tricking high school classmates into sex in Facebook scam

    MILWAUKEE - An 18-year-old male student is accused of posing as a girl on Facebook, tricking at least 31 male classmates into sending him naked photos of themselves and then blackmailing some for sex acts. "The kind of manipulation that occurred here is really sinister in my estimation," Waukesha County District Attorney Brad Schimel said Wednesday. The students go to New Berlin Eisenhower High School in New Berlin, which is in Waukesha County about 15 miles west of Milwaukee.

    Anthony Stancl, of New Berlin, was charged Wednesday with five counts of child enticement, two counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child, two counts of third-degree sexual assault, possession of child pornography, repeated sexual assault of the same child, and making a bomb threat. Stancl's attorney, Craig Kuhary, said Stancl plans to plead not guilty to the charges and hopes to reach a plea agreement with the district attorney "It's too early in the case for me to make a statement, other than the fact at some point we are going to go into events that had taken place earlier that might have had some impact on what he did here," he said. He wouldn't go into specifics.

    The incidents allegedly happened from spring 2007 through November, when officers questioned Stancl about a bomb threat he allegedly sent to teachers and wrote about on a school's bathroom wall. It resulted in the closing of New Berlin Eisenhower Middle and High School. According to the criminal complaint, Stancl first contacted the students through the social networking site Facebook, pretending to be a girl named Kayla or Emily. The boys reported that they were tricked into sending nude photos or videos of themselves, the complaint said.

    Thirty-one victims were identified and interviewed and more than half said the girl with whom they thought they were communicating tried to get them to meet with a male friend to let him perform sex acts on them. They were told that if they didn't, she would send the nude photos or movies to their friends and post them on the Internet, according to the complaint. Stancl allegedly used the excuse to get the victims to perform repeated acts, the complaint said. Seven boys were identified in the complaint by their initials as either having to allegedly perform sex acts on Stancl or Stancl on them. The complaint said Stancl took photos with his cell phone of the encounters.

    Officers found about 300 nude images of juvenile males on his computer, according to the complaint. Prosecutors said the victims were as young as 15. A preliminary hearing for Stancl has been scheduled for Feb. 26. The maximum penalty if convicted on all charges is nearly 300 years in prison.

    A multi-millionaire is funding a legal challenge to halt the controversial adoption of two young children by a gay couple. In a move brokered by the Catholic Church in Scotland, the businessman has agreed to help meet the legal costs of a court bid to block plans to hand the brother and sister to two men.

    The Mail on Sunday can reveal that a top law firm has been instructed to help the grandparents of the children, whom social workers ruled were too old, at 46 and 59, to offer a loving home. With the support of the benefactor and the Catholic Church, the family hope the move will quickly lead to a judicial review of Edinburgh City Council’s decision to remove the four-year-old girl and her five-year-old brother from their family. The tycoon, who has requested anonymity, was among a group of businessmen considering offering the family financial support after the adoption plans were revealed last week.

    His offer has received the ‘moral backing’ of the Catholic Church, which is fundamentally opposed to gay adoptions. Last night a spokesman for the Church said: ‘As well as the moral issue there is also a legal question, which needs to be explored. Lawyers will be taking this forward with the family. ‘Allowing two men to adopt children against the wishes of their grandparents who want to care for them is positively wicked.’

    Phone call: Social worker Heather Rush allegedly told the two children's grandparents that they will have no more contact after speaking out The development comes after the devastated grandparents, who cannot be named for legal reasons, made an official complaint to council bosses. They have claimed they were warned they would never see the children again unless they dropped their opposition to the adoption, and again threatened with the same fate for speaking out publicly.

    The family claim they have been victims of ‘bullying’ social workers and politically-correct manipulation. The devoted couple had fought for two years for the right to care for their grandchildren, whose 26-year-old mother is a recovering heroin addict.

    They agreed to an adoption only after they faced being financially crippled by legal bills and were promised continued contact with the children. But they were devastated when they were told the children were going to be placed with a homosexual couple.

    There were several heterosexual couples on the council’s books willing to offer a loving home – leading to suggestions that the council was operating a politically-correct quota system.

    The move flew in the face of social-work reports that show the girl is ‘wary’ of men. Last night the grandmother broke down in tears when told of the mystery benefactor’s desire to help block the adoption. She said: ‘I can’t believe anyone would do that for us. We are so grateful.’ Her husband, a farm worker, added: ‘Because of the generosity of a stranger, we might have a chance to put things right, not only for our family but for others who are put in this position.’

    To place children with two gay men when an adoptive mother and father are available, just to uphold a brutal dogma, is a sickening assault on family life

    When homosexuality was legalised back in 1967 did anyone dream that some four decades on a British grandmother and grandfather wanting to adopt their own grandchildren would be refused permission and the children adopted instead by two gay men? The case in Edinburgh reported today, where precisely this grotesque development has occurred, illustrates the sickening way in which what started out as a decent attempt to be tolerant towards a minority lifestyle has turned into a totalitarian assault upon family life and human rights.

    For two years these grandparents fought for their right to care for the children, a five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, whose 26-year-old mother is a recovering heroin addict. But at 46 and 59 they were ruled to be too old to adopt. Reluctantly, therefore, they agreed to the children being adopted by another couple, on the basis they would be brought up by a loving mother and father figure. But although several heterosexual couples were available to adopt them, the children were handed over instead to two gay men. When the devastated grandparents objected they were threatened that unless they dropped their opposition they would never see their grandchildren again on account of their ‘negative’ attitude towards gay adoption.

    There are so many layers to this gross and terrifying abuse of power that one hardly knows where to start. The reason why adoption is so successful at raising healthy, well-adjusted children is that it replicates as far as possible the biological mother and father whose presence in the family is so crucial to the well-being of their children. The prevailing argument that all types of family are as good as each other as far as the children are concerned simply isn’t true. While some children emerge relatively unscathed from irregular households, children need to be brought up by the two people ‘who made me’ - or, in adoptive households, in a family which closely replicates that arrangement. Where that does not happen, the child’s deepest sense of his or her identity as a human being is at some level damaged.

    A child needs a mother and father because their roles in bringing that child up, and the way the child sees each of them, are not interchangeable. They are different and complementary, which is why if one of them is absent the child suffers, in many cases very badly indeed. For very young children the absence of a mother, whose nurturing role cannot be replicated even by the most loving and attentive of fathers, is particularly tragic. Therefore to say that depriving children of a mother figure is in their best interests - as the Edinburgh social workers have said - is clearly ridiculous.

    Yes, in certain very unusual cases a lesbian couple or individual might be the best option for a child without a functioning family - if for example the child already has a particular attachment to such individuals, or if the only alternative is life in a children’s home. But where an adoptive mother and father are available, to place children instead with two gay men is beyond perverse. Quite obviously, the interests of these children have been subordinated to politically correct considerations. The powers invested in social workers to interfere in family life are extensive and draconian, and are granted only because of the acknowledged need to safeguard the interests of children against abusive family situations. But in this case, it is Edinburgh social services department that has grossly abused its position of trust by intentionally placing these most vulnerable children in a position of disadvantage and maybe even harm for nothing other than ideological reasons. Worse still, they have threatened and intimidated the children’s grandparents - for daring to object to a course of action for their own grandchildren which they think with good reason would be detrimental to them.

    It is beyond pathetic to read the grandfather trying to protest that he is not ‘homophobic’ - all for having the temerity to say that his own grandchildren need a mother and father figure in their lives. For that he is branded a bigot. Indeed, where ‘gay rights’ are concerned the old joke that what was once forbidden becomes in due course mandatory has now come all too true in post-morality Britain. Despite the fact that gay adoption is opposed by most people - polls suggest that some 90 per cent are opposed in Scotland - the law that enabled it was rammed through Parliament with the help, to their eternal shame, of the politically correct Cameroons. Ever since, it has been promoted assiduously by left-wing councils – some of which forbid adoption by smokers and obese people but actively support gay fostering and adoption.

    Such people routinely claim that research shows there are no adverse outcomes for children from same-sex adoption. These claims are totally untrue. The fact is that there are virtually no studies of children adopted by gay couples - or raised by male same-sex couples. In general, studies of same-sex child rearing are in turn extremely thin on the ground and methodologically too unsound to be authoritative. Nevertheless they do suggest cause for concern: their emerging theme seems to be that children raised by same-sex couples exhibit poor outcomes not so dissimilar to those raised by divorced heterosexual parents. While such studies can’t be relied upon they can’t be dismissed either. An American account published 20 years described what happened when a male child was conceived by a surrogate mother for two homosexual men. They hired various nannies to help look after the child - who developed severe behavioural problems, fantasising about ‘buying a new mother’ because of his profound need for a mother figure in his life.

    But even to raise such concerns is to run the gauntlet of shrieks of ‘homophobia’. Such vilification is designed for one purpose - to stigmatise and thus silence altogether all opposition as ‘bigotry’. The underlying agenda behind gay adoption, as it is behind the whole gay rights movement, is nothing to do with protecting the rights of gay people. Were it really so, there would be no objection. No-one should be discriminated against simply on the grounds of his or her sexuality. That does not mean, however, that gay lifestyles must be regarded as of equal value to heterosexual households when it comes to the raising of children. To say that anyone who makes such a distinction is prejudiced is to turn reality on its head.

    But that is indeed the whole point of the gay rights movement - to destroy the very notion of heterosexual norms of sexual behaviour and the definition of the family so that gay lifestyles can present themselves as ‘normal’. This in turn is part of the broader onslaught upon the Judeo-Christian principles upon which British society and western civilisation are based, which has been mounted now for decades by ideologues of the left and which has progressively eviscerated family life on the altar of individual ‘lifestyle choice’. The result is a world turned on its head in which what is harmful is said to be good and what is good is said to be harmful; tolerance has turned into gross intolerance; and upholding human rights has turned into an onslaught upon human rights. The hapless Scottish grandparents are but the latest victims of a brutal totalitarian dogma, which anyone with an ounce of real liberal principle should denounce for the attack on justice, humanity and common-sense that it undoubtedly is.
  • 'They say we're too old to care for our grandchildren': Social workers hand brother and sister to gay men for adoption
    Only homosexuals,masons and serial criminals get human rights in the perverse UK.

    Two predatory paedophile lovers who abused young boys at their flat were jailed indefinitely today.

    Stephen Carruthers, 49, and John Bates, 45, began their relationship in prison while serving lengthy sentences for similar sex offences. The authorities were powerless to prevent them living together on their release because of human rights legislation, Preston Crown Court heard. The pair, who both have a string of paedophile convictions dating back to the early 1980s, met in Strangeways prison in Manchester and then went on to live in Blackpool, Lancashire. They used enticements of money and boasts of celebrity connections to lure four 14-year-olds to their ground floor flat in Caunce Street in the resort.

    Sentencing the pair to indeterminate sentences, Judge Christopher Cornwall said: 'The simple dreadful reality in this matter in my judgment is you are incorrigible, predatory paedophiles. 'You simply cannot resist the temptation of making contact with boys with the purpose of abusing them for your own sexual gratification. 'The harm that you have caused to each of those boys is hard to calculate. What they all have in common is that you were intent on exploiting them and their innocence. 'You have cast a very dark shadow over their early teens.' Judge Cornwall added: 'I have no doubt you pose an extremely high and significant risk of causing very serious harm to other boys in the future, just as you have done on every single occasion you have been released from prison. 'You are both extremely dangerous. No under-age boy is safe in your company.' Carruthers was ordered to serve a minimum of five-and-half years in jail before he can be considered for parole after he was convicted of three counts of engaging in sexual activity with a child, grooming and child abduction.

    Bates must serve at least four-and-half years for committing three counts of engaging in sexual activity with a child and one of child abduction. However, the judge said he wanted to 'make it abundantly clear' that both were facing lengthy prison terms. 'I do not expect any application for release to the Parole Board to succeed for a very long time,' he said. Both men were disqualified from working with children for life and must not have any unsupervised contact with children. The Probation Service and police were aware the men - both on the Sex Offenders Register - were living together but could only monitor them.

    Even if the couple are eventually released they will still be able to move back in together under current laws. Richard Howarth, prosecuting, said: 'The Crown would have wanted an order that the defendants do not reside with each other because it is when they are together they are most dangerous, but I believe that may offend human rights legislation.' The prosecutors said the pair's victims were lulled into a false sense of security as they were groomed in a 'deliberate and expert fashion'. Two of the boys met Carruthers as he asked them to look after his dogs while he popped into a shop to buy cigarettes.

    He was soon offering them small amounts of money to carry out odd jobs in his flat before suggesting he could give them 'a million pound each' to satisfy his desires. They also claimed to be former jockeys who knew many famous people and would show a picture of them apparently posing with Sir David Jason in his role as Del Boy from Only Fools and Horses. One of the victims had learning difficulties which Carruthers exploited to confuse the boy. In victim impact statements read to the court, one mother said she had 'gone through hell' and that her son was still terrified that the pair would escape from prison. Another mother said her son had talked of committing suicide and was constantly being teased at school after he told classmates about his ordeal.

    Mr Howarth said that boy's family had moved away because of their predicament to get away from the memories the two men had caused. Carruthers had a history of sex offending that stretched back to 1981. Bates's criminal record began in Newcastle in 1983. Both men sacked their defence teams ahead of giving mitigation today. Carruthers told the court: 'My partner and I have been in a relationship for 10 years and in that 10 years together at no time have we got together to plan to abuse any children.' Both denied all the charges against them but were convicted by a jury at their trial in December. Outside court, Detective Inspector Tony Baxter, from Blackpool Police's public protection unit, said: 'I am extremely happy with the sentence passed on to these dangerous individuals.

    'It sends out a strong message to anyone who commits such offences that when they are caught they will be dealt with robustly by the courts. 'Carruthers and Bates are clearly dangerous individuals and the public needs to be protected from them. 'I would like to commend the young victims for their courage in coming forward and the way they gave their evidence under trying circumstances at court. 'I hope this sentence will be of some comfort to them and their families and I hope that they will grow into successful young men.'

    Our organisation has been concerned for a long time about the governments ridiculous argument on gay adoption. They cannot create naturally their own children so they steal heterosexual children and give them to these utter scum to abuse .We have a government that is acting to put many childrens lives at risk supposedly to protect the HUMAN RIGHTS of gay abusers.

    Our group find this utterly abhorrent and will continue to demand a complete overhaul of gays adopting children as this is a licence for perverts to join up as a couple and gain access to kids via the UK governments deranged adoption policies. Though Westminster seems to have more than its fair share of gays that are voting on these ridiculous laws that are seriously undermining the welfare of our children AND MUST BE STOPPED.

    Gay couple left free to abuse boys - because social workers feared being branded homophobic

    A homosexual foster couple were left free to sexually abuse vulnerable boys in their care because social workers feared being accused of discrimination if they investigated complaints, an inquiry concluded yesterday. Craig Faunch and Ian Wathey were one of the first homosexual couples in the country to be officially approved as foster parents.

    They looked after 18 children in only 15 months.

    Ian Wathey (left) and Craig Faunch were jailed last year for sexually abusing young boys With no previous convictions, they came across as respectable men who simply wanted to help boys with a variety of problems. In reality, they were paedophiles, who repeatedly abused the children in their care.

    Even when the mother of two of the children reported her suspicions to the council, officials accepted the men's explanations and did nothing. Instead of banning children from staying with Faunch and Wathey, they sent youngsters with more serious problems to them. Between them, the couple abused four boys aged between eight and 14. In a scathing report published yesterday, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council was condemned for treating the men as "trophy carers".

    The children's charity Kidscape said those in charge of overseeing the safety of children in the care of Faunch and Wathey had allowed political correctness to override common sense. The report, following an independent review of the case, said: "One manager described the couple as 'trophy carers' which led to 'slack arrangements' over placement. "Another said that by virtue of their sexuality they had a 'badge' which made things less questionable.

    "The sexual orientation of the men was a significant cause of people not 'thinking the unthinkable'. "It was clear that a number of staff were afraid of being thought homophobic. "The fear of being discriminatory led them to fail to discriminate between the appropriate and the abusive."

    The report also accused the council of failing to carry out proper assessments before and after the children were placed with Faunch and Wathey. "Issues arose in the first longer-term placement of two children, including potential indicators of child sexual abuse, which were inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon," it said. "More children were then placed with Faunch and Wathey, some successfully, some with concerns which were again inadequately investigated, understood or acted upon.

    "The practice of some social workers in this case was deficient." The report's authors, led by former Surrey social services chief Brian Parrott, said they could not be sure that Faunch and Wathey were "predatory paedophiles" who became foster carers in order to have access to children. They added: "Our criticisms are much more of those in middle management whose job it was to piece together what was really happening, to ask the right questions and to be critical and probing."

    Wathey, 42, was jailed for five years in June last year after being convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a child and one offence of causing a child to watch sexual activity. Faunch, 33, received a six-year jail sentence after he was found guilty of five charges of engaging in sexual activity with a child and two of taking indecent photographs of a child. The couple, who lived together in Pontefract, West Yorkshire, were approved as foster carers by the council in August 2003.

    Their victims included a 14-year-old boy with Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism,who had a mental age of seven and was forced by Wathey to watch gay pornography. Another youngster with a "very troubled background" was only in their care for a few weeks before being abused by Faunch. But social workers had been aware of "inappropriate" behaviour long before then.

    Just eight months after they started as professional foster carers a mother of eight-year-old twins, who couldn't cope with raising them on her own, voiced concerns about them with social services. While visiting the twins, the 34-yearold single mother was shown a picture taken by Faunch showing one of the boys going to the lavatory during a visit to Butlin's holiday camp in Skegness and discovered a similar snap had been taken of the other twin. A social worker took the photograph and promised a full investigation.

    But the court heard that not only did social services staff lose the photo, they decided against contacting police after accepting Faunch's explanation that he was trying to embarrass the boys into shutting the lavatory door. Police later discovered that, days after the photos were taken, Faunch recorded an indecent video of the twins taking a shower. They began abusing the boys three months later. Undetected, the offences continued over an 11-month period, Leeds Crown Court was told last year.

    Police were called in to investigate the couple only after one of the abused boys told a woman he had been touched by one of the men. Faunch abused all four boys and Wathey targeted one of them. Judge Sally Cahill, QC, said neither had shown "empathy, remorse or any responsibility for their actions".

    Yesterday's report said that the fostering panel which approved Faunch and Wathey accepted without hesitation their request to look after only boys on the basis that they didn't feel equipped to look after girls. The report made 41 recommendations for overhauling the council's fostering process. Last night, Michelle Elliott, a director of Kidscape, said: "Common sense went out of the window when they allowed political correctness to take over in this case.

    "I don't care if you are homosexual or bisexual - if you are taking care of children you need to be vetted and subjected to the same investigation as anyone else. "Child abuse knows no gender boundaries." Elaine McHale, the council's corporate director of family services, said it would be "inappropriate" to comment on the report until after a meeting of the full council on September 12.

    Lillian Ladele refused to officiate 'sinful' gay marriages, because of her religious beliefs

    A Christian registrar who refused to carry out gay civil ceremonies she regards as sinful is set to win thousands of pounds in compensation after winning a landmark legal battle. Lillian Ladele, 47, was bullied and threatened with the sack from a London council after asking to be excused from conducting civil partnerships for gay men and women because of her deeply held religious beliefs, a tribunal found.

    Islington Council cared too much about the rights of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual community, the panel ruled. It showed 'no respect' for Miss Ladele's rights as an orthodox Christian and gave her an ultimatum to choose between her beliefs and her £31,000-a-year job, which she held for nearly 16 years.

    She was treated like a 'pariah' by colleagues and left in an 'intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment', the tribunal found. The Central London tribunal upheld Miss Ladele's claims of discrimination, harassment and victimisation on the grounds of religion or beliefs. Its landmark ruling that employees cannot be required to act against their consciences has implications for the 18,000 same-sex ceremonies conducted nationwide each year. Council chiefs had insisted it would give the wrong message if Miss Ladele was exempted. Her subsequent claim had outraged gay rights groups.

    But the tribunal ruled: 'This is a situation where there is a conflict between two rights or freedoms. 'It is an important case, which may have a wider impact than the dispute between the parties. The tribunal accepts that it would be wrong for one set of rights to trump another. 'Islington Council rightly considered the importance of the right of the gay community not to be discriminated against, but did not consider the right of Miss Ladele as a member of a religious group.'

    Referring to the council's failure to take Miss Ladele's concerns seriously, and its disciplining of her, the tribunal ruled: 'These acts amount to a violation of Miss Ladele's dignity and created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for her.' It noted that council staff had admitted they could provide a 'first class service' without Miss Ladele being forced to carry out civil partnership ceremonies.

    It also found that Miss Ladele had a good work record, dealing regularly with gay men and women. Speaking after the ruling, Miss Ladele said: 'I am delighted with the decision. It is a victory for religious liberty, not just for myself but for others in a similar position to mine. 'Gay rights should not be used as an excuse to bully or harass people over their religious beliefs.'Miss Ladele's legal fees were paid by the Christian Institute. Her compensation will be considered by the tribunal in September, with there being no limit to the amount a panel can award for religious discrimination. Islington Council said it was disappointed by the result which carried a 'wider implication' for local authorities and was considering an appeal against the result.

    Councillor John Gilbert said: 'We're clearly disappointed with the result, as we consider our approach was the right one.'We are now considering the judgment carefully in order to decide whether we should appeal. 'On first reading, the Tribunal seems to have based its findings primarily on the fact that we could have continued to provide civil partnerships without Ms Ladele.'The wider issue of whether councils should be able to expect employees to carry out civil partnerships doesn't seem to have been fully addressed. 'In our view this is a crucial question that has much wider implications for local authorities and employers. 'We'd like to assure staff and service users that our commitment to services and equalities won't be affected."

    One of the biggest threats to heterosexual families but especially their children

    U.N. grants status to homosexual-rights groups
    Opponents fear loss of sovereignty, ties to pedophilia advocates

    The U.N. recently accorded two homosexual-rights groups "consultative status," raising opposition from pro-family advocates who see the move as a weakening of national sovereignty that could result in lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex. U.N. watchdogs also cite homosexual-rights groups' historical alignment with organizations advocating pedophilia. The U.N.'s Economic and Social Council, the organ facilitating international cooperation on standards-making and problem-solving in economic and social issues, has accepted COC Netherlands and the State Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Transexuals and Bisexuals of Spain.

    This "means we can join the efforts at the U.N. to address human rights violations against people with an alternative sexual orientation or gender identity," said Björn van Roozendaal, COC Netherlands international advocacy officer. But members of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute accuse homosexual groups of attempting to weaken sovereignty and impose "gay rights" through a "well-coordinated" international stealth campaign tainted by associations with pro-pedophilia groups. The pro-homosexual lobby consistently has attempted to advance through the U.N. since 1993, when an umbrella homosexual advocacy group, the International Lesbian Gay Association, or ILGA, achieved U.N. consultative status.

    But after revelations that several ILGA members were pedophile organizations, the late Republican Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina led a campaign to suspend ILGA's U.N. status. Four pro-pedophile groups were associated with ILGA.

    The American NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, advocates for intergenerational "consensual sexual relations." The Dutch-based MARTINJN works "for acceptance of pedophilia and adult-child love relationships."

    U.S.-based Project TRUTH

    The German Verein für Sexuelle Gleichberechtigung, or Association for Sexual Equality. In 1994, the U.N. took the unusual step of suspending ILGA membership. ILGA then, by a vote of 214-30, voted out all of its pro-pedophile groups, except for VSG. The German group, however, later was suspended for its vocal support of NAMBLA. Following the revelations and suspension of ILGA's NGO consultative status, NAMBLA issued statements detailing its working relationship with ILGA and claimed to have helped draft ILGA's constitution. In 2003, IGLA petitioned to have its consultative status reinstated but was denied by a vote of 29 to 17.

    Cameroon, China, Cuba, Iran, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Senegal, Sudan, the U.S. and Zimbabwe cast votes against ILGA, while France, Germany and Romania voted for the organization. Following the vote, a U.N. communiqué stated, "The vote in favor of not granting status to that NGO would reaffirm the will and commitment of the international community to protect children." In 2006, however, the U.N. granted consultative status to a gay-rights Danish group associated with ILGA-Europe.

    Well-coordinated campaign

    Responding to the newly granted status given the Spanish and Dutch group, Boris Dittrich, advocacy director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Program at Human Rights Watch, said "This vote ensures that two more voices will be raised to defend basic human rights at the U.N." But critics see a reason for concern in what has been called "well-coordinated international campaign." As director of government relation for Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute – which advocates for "the preservation of international law by discrediting socially radical policies at the United Nations and other international institutions" – Samantha Singson has worked on pro-life, pro-family international policy for over eight years.

    Singson told WND there is a great concern for screening LGBT, or "lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual," groups for any ties to pedophilia. "These nominations are getting a lot more scrutiny, because of the past affiliations," she said. Responding to the concern, Scott Long, director of the LGBT rights program for Human Rights Watch, wrote in a statement to WND, "ILGA has made clear that it supports the right of all children to be free of abuse, including sexual abuse."

    But it's clear that none of the pedophile groups consider sex with a minor "abuse." On the NAMBLA website, the association calls itself a "voice testifying to the benevolent aspects of man/boy love." Brend Varma, the human rights spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general, told WND that Ban Ki-Moon will always advocate that "we believe in human rights for all people; specific policies towards sexual orientation throughout the world is a matter for the member states." Yet it's not clear that "all people" includes all ages. In Canada, Israel, the UK and Australia, homosexual activists consistently have pushed for lowering age of consent laws, to align the homosexual age for consensual sex with that of heterosexuals.

    International advocacy coupled with local activism could pressure governments to lower the age. Piero Tozzi observed that the UK is particularly active in pushing for the inclusion of LGBT non-governmental organizations into the U.N. system. In an interview with WND, Tozzi said the representatives from Egypt, Poland and Malta have been "very prepared" in defending their opposition to LGBT activism under the guise of "non-discrimination." Human Rights Watch's Long criticized the Egyptian delegation for asking, "Is your organization forcing people to adopt a particular lifestyle that will lead to the eventual extinction of the human race?"

    Long called the question "ridiculous."

    Singson said "non-discrimination" and "in the spirit of inclusion" have become "code terms for sneaking in pro-LGBT language into important international human rights documents." "There is a tendency for LGBT advocates to change terms like 'husband' and 'wife' to the ambiguous 'partner,'" she said.

    "We've even had lively debates about the term 'family' vs. 'families,' a term that could include same-sex arrangements, she added. "There's a crisis in human rights," said Singson. "Countries agree to universal rights, but they get something entirely different when they agree to recognize these groups."

    For anyone unconvinced there is something utterly evil about all those involved in UK child welfare. Judges,lawyers,social workers ,police, care staff and the myriad of jobsworths all connected with child theft then the failure to protect them. The satanic cult has a system of control that involves using children as a means to blackmail their goons and the slow exposure of a complicit mass media who have covered up this evil shows the depths this abuse goes.

    Child theft is a massive legal racket with vulnerable children left in the hands of monsters. Just like the judicial monsters who ,thanks to the UK's complicit mass media have been getting away with murder for far to long. A civil war is long overdue in the UK while this evil continues unabated.

    Dozens of Croydon children were physically and sexually abused at a country care home, the Croydon Guardian can reveal. The children were sent to Old Rectory School, Banham, Norfolk, from the borough over a 30 year period. Children at the home were subjected to a catalogue of abuse by members of the staff which only ended in 2003 when the school was closed down.

    Now a law firm has launched a class action against the estate of the home’s former owners and is searching for victims from Croydon. Cambridge based Andrew Grove & Company solicitors has located 35 former residents so far, a quarter of which come from Croydon. Kathy Yates, the solicitor who lodged a compensation claim last week, said: “Some of the children at this home were subjected to some truly degrading and horrific acts by the staff and other residents. “There are potentially hundreds of people that may have been affected by the crimes committed at the Old Rectory School.“It appears that many of the children sent to live at Banham suffered a miserable existence in a Dickensian type institution. They suffered from various abuses from certain members of staff.

    “Even though many years have passed since the abuse took place it is not too late for former pupils to tell their stories and receive compensation for the abuse they suffered.” One 31-year-old former resident, who does not want to be named, was sent to the school when he was six-years-old and is currently living and working in Croydon. He said: “The abuse started when I first arrived at the school. My stepmother and I did not get on so I was sent to the school because she didn’t like me. It was supposedly because of my ‘disruptive’ behaviour. “I was forced to share a room with a complete psychopath who treated me like a slave. He was a lot older than me. I was sexually abused. “The abuse I suffered was horrific but other children had it worse than I did. I was a quiet lad and I was academically clever, so I tended to avoid the abuse from the teachers and staff.

    “On one occasion I can remember a teacher kicking seven-bells out of a boy while we waited for class to start. When I saw him in the playground after class his face was bloody and bruised and his clothes were ripped.” The man said he is still emotionally damaged by his nine years at the school and tried to avoid involvement with a criminal trial against the former owners of the school. He said he suffers from low confidence and has nervous tendencies. He said: “The children who were sent to school need to know that it was not their fault what happened to them. “They shouldn’t think that they brought any of it on themselves. Some may think they deserved it because they were misbehaved and sent to the school but it is the school’s fault not theirs. “I have luckily managed to turn my life around. Once I left the school I went to college and then university and I’ve started to rebuild my life.”

    The abusers and the abused

    Childhood is meant to be the best years of a person’s life but for the children at a Norfolk care home it was a living hell During the 70s, 80s and 90s residents of former care home and school, the Old Rectory School, Banham, were systematically abused by both staff and fellow students under the watchful gaze of the owners, George and Tony Robson. While at the school many of the children were subjected to humiliating, violent and sexual abuse at the hands of the people charged with their care and safety. Pupils were encouraged to fight each other while goaded by members of staff. A boy was forced to eat his own vomit and others were beaten with a plimsoll and a studded belt. One child was forced to smash his new toys with a hammer after damaging a piece of furniture. In 2003, investigations by the BBC uncovered the child abuse scandal and a police investigation resulted in many charges. Senior members of staff including owners George Robson and Tony Robson, teacher David Clark and housemaster Leslie Beckett faced trials. A three-year media blackout was lifted in October 2007 when George Robson and his brother Tony were sentenced at Norwich Crown Court.

    They received suspended sentences as George Robson, 66, was unwell suffering from heart disease and died the day after his sentencing. George Robson had been due to face trial following allegations of sexual abuse on five girls in his care. After reports from a cardiologist and a neuro-physician the court decided that he was not fit to stand trial for the sex offences. Another abuser, Leslie Beckett, who was facing 13 allegations of indecent assault also died before he could stand trial. George Robson was found guilty of nine counts of child cruelty and was sentenced to two years imprisonment, suspended, on November 12, 2007. His brother Anthony Robson, known as Mr Thomas to the children, was convicted on three counts and sentenced to one year’s imprisonment, suspended on December 11, 2007. Care worker, David Clark was found guilty of four counts and also received a suspended sentence.

    Darrell was sent to Banham from Croydon.

    “I moved to the Becketts’ house and Mr and Mrs Beckett became my house parents. I was about 12 or 13 years old. “The abuse started when I had my first bath. Mr Beckett came in and knelt next to the bath. He put his hands in the water and touched my private parts saying, ‘What have we got here then?’ “This was the start of regular sessions that continued all the time I was at the Old Rectory. “Mr Beckett was always there at bath time. I was terrified of him. He was a big man. I was frightened of what he would do if I said ‘no’. “For years I did not know if I was gay or straight. When I left school I tried to kill myself and spent months in hospital. I am now permanently disabled.

    Suzanne was sent to Banham from Croydon.

    “One of the main rules at meal time was that everything on your plate had to be eaten. Staff used to check our plates. “I vividly recall one occasion when I was 11-years-old when a female teacher force-fed me semolina even though I hated it. She grabbed my hair and pulled my head back. She then took my spoon and forced it into my mouth two or three times. “The dining room was full and lots of people witnessed this. “She slapped my face because I still refused to eat the semolina. I vomited on my plate. “She then pushed my face into the vomit.”

    Dean was sent to Banham from Croydon.

    “Lawrence had been stealing again. It wasn’t anything much. Lawrence was always hungry as we all were and he sometimes used to steal food from the kitchens. It was about 1978 and I was eight years old. “We were playing in the play area after tea. We suddenly noticed Lawrence. He had been placed on a log by Mr Robson in the middle of the play area in complete display. “He had a large plaque, like a sandwich board, around his neck. On one side was written, ‘I am a thief’ and on the other side, ‘I am a fool’. “Mr Robson had placed a bell in his hands and every 20 seconds Lawrence had to ring the bell and shout out, ‘I am a thief and a fool’. He was on the log for hours.

  • 'Bully' boss ran special needs school under 'climate of fear'
    The Scottish Parliament has a radical feminist/gay agenda undermining heterosexual males the backbone of Scottish society and who are being fleeced by the political and legal mafia that masquerade as defenders of our rights. Divorce has been a racket for those who have been making laws that steal NON mason mens homes and assets but most importantly their children. Giving GAYS the right to adopt those children for their own ends

    The Scottish Parliament are pulling objections to a gay marriage petition . However we did add a further comment stating "this website refuses to publish comments that are against this petition ".

  • Gay couple left free to abuse boys - because social workers feared being branded homophobic
  • MSP on CCTV in sex act with male aide
  • Gay paedophile lovers abused boys in flat they were allowed to share 'because of human rights legislation'
  • 'They say we're too old to care for our grandchildren': Social workers hand brother and sister to gay men for adoption

    School board breaking federal law with 'gay' day?

    Mandatory 'gay' day for K-5 students

    Teachers cite 'clergy' privilege to hide lesbian teaching

    'Gay' day coming to California public schools?

    Stealth lessons on homosexuality

    Teaching homosexuality, no parents needed

    Student resolution objects to 'gay' promotion

    Death threats target those opposing 'gay' day

    Keep kids home, parents are told

    Parental permission required for 'gay' club

    'Gay' day squashed on campus

    District bans 'John 3:16,' promotes demonic leer

    Crackdown on biblical speech challenged

    Parents urged to boycott homosexual indoctrination

    Student told: 'Leave your faith in the car'

    California ripped as 'too queer for school'

    Christians need Exodus from 'Pharoah's system'

    Baptist 'exit strategy' means get kids out of public schools