SCOTLAND

BBC RADIO 4 WITH STEWART MacKENZIE ON REPRESENTATION IN SCOTTISH COURTS VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • SCOTLAND'S FORMER WEE MR.McNASTY FIRST MINISTER NOW IN HOUSE OF CROOKS(LORDS)
    lord mcclown Former First Minister Jack McConnell listens to the Queen's writ confirming his investiture as a life peer in the House of Lords

    This wee Mr. Nasty was heading the Scottish government when more of our members than at any other time were persecuted by the cops and legal mafia some of us forcibly evicted under his regime. He makes Mugabe look like an angel, his reward for propping up a corrupt crown and the myriad of twisted judges that got away with murder on his watch, he should be renamed Lord McClown. The price was a nice wee reward as a new lord inside the house of crooks.

    Cheer up Jack McConnell, you're in the Lords

    A DECADE ago as a minister, Jack McConnell declared that he wanted to open up Scotland's "elitist" quangos to ordinary people rather than the great and the good. So there must have been something quite satisfying for the Motherwell and Wishaw MSP to be invested in the biggest quango in the land – the wholly appointed House of Lords.

    Red faced and sweltering in the heat, the soon to be noble Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale of the Isle Arran in Ayrshire and Arran, yesterday entered the House of Lords to hear the Queen's writ confirming his investiture. He was perhaps pleased to hear from the clerk that as a peer he was now entitled to "privileges and immunities". Whether that made the Upper Chamber any less elitist was a matter of some debate.

    But, celebrating his humble origins, his new title was adopted from the sheep farm he grew up on as a boy which made it all the more appropriate that the doleful looking Lord Howe – once famously described in the Commons as a "dead sheep" – was sitting nearby observing events. Unusually for a new peer, Lord McConnell was initially reluctant for his official picture to be distributed to the press. With his wife Bridget and grown-up children there to see the occasion maybe he wanted to keep it as a family moment.

    But could it be, some whispered, that Lord McConnell was actually thinking back to the last time he was photographed in strange garb? That Tartan Week picture of him posing in a pinstripe kilt in New York back in 2004 provided devolved Scotland with its biggest cringe yet and has haunted the poor MSP for Motherwell and Wishaw ever since. In the end he relented, but as he strode out behind a man dressed as a coat of arms to be introduced in the Upper House, it was clear that the, at that point Mr McConnell esquire, could hardly wait to get out of his red robe and fake ermine.

    He looked a lot less comfortable than the new Liberal Democrat peer Floella Benjamin, the former presenter of children's TV programme Playschool, whose presence did lead to some speculation about what shaped window the new inductees would appear from. There was no shortage of opponents grumbling that he should not be there at all. Within a few hours of his investiture the SNP were asking how Mr McConnell could remain an MSP and serve in the House of Lords? Central Scotland MSP Christina McKelvie said it went against the spirit of the Kelly recommendations on Standards in Public Life which call for the phasing out of dual mandates by 2011.

    "Jack McConnell's constituents in Motherwell and Wishaw don't know if their MSP is coming or going," she said. She seemed to have forgotten, a Labour source noted, that until a few short weeks ago her party leader, Alex Salmond somehow managed to be an MP for Banff and Buchan, MSP for Gordon and First Minister. And Mr McConnell is not the only Lord-cum-MSP. His friend Lord George Foulkes, MSP for the Lothians, was caught on the Heathrow Express and missed the two minute ceremony.

    Speaking before he took his seat, Mr McConnell said he was looking forward to life in the Lords, adding: "Glenscorrodale is a special place for me. My roots are there and it was there that I formed my values and developed my interests and passions. "I will respect this honour and the House of Lords but it will not change me or the causes I care most about."

  • SOURCE
  • RIDER TELLS OF HER ORDEAL AT HANDS OF TRUMP'S THUGS
    trump DONALD Trump's security team have been accused of intimidation after a horserider was subjected to a "terrifying ordeal" on the tycoon's Aberdeenshire estate.

    A complaint has now been lodged with Grampian Police from a woman who claims she was "detained against her will" by six of Mr Trump's security guards while riding on the dunes. The 28-year-old, who does not wish to be named, claims to have ridden through the dunes and was heading back to her stables when a jeep came speeding along the beach behind her and forced her to stop.

    She said: "A jeep with two security guys came on to the beach and came up after me at high speed with lights flashing. "They spooked my horse quite badly and I nearly came off.

    The woman says she was then held for 45 minutes while security waited for police to arrive. "I was expecting a police car and then these two Range Rovers pulled up. "Out stepped about four American security guards and a woman dressed in a suit. "I was interrogated by the woman and two of the men. They were quite aggressive and accused me of vandalism that took place two weeks ago. It was a terrifying ordeal." Raymond Davidson, 65, who runs the stables with partner Shelley Johnstone, said: "I have filed a serious complaint with Grampian Police about the unacceptable behaviour of these Trump employees and trust that action will be taken."

  • SOURCE
  • REPOSSESSED HOUSE IN ABERDEEN AREA

    This house has been ILLEGALLY repossessed the previous EVICTED owners returned umpteen times to live in, what they believe is their home, stolen by the legal mafia in Scotland that are running riot.

    In desperation the corrupt lawyers who do this regularly, and we have our own personal experience of how they operate, Aberdein Considine used shuttering on the windows and doors to keep the illegally evicted owners from re-entering the property. This mob act for banks like the Bank of Scotland to STEAL back homes using every dirty filthy trick in the book.

    THE UTTER SCUM OF THE EARTH.
    SCOTTISH MSP CAUGHT LETCHERING SCHOOLGIRL ON OPEN MIC VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FULL LENGTH VIDEO HERE
  • MSP resigns over ogling schoolgirl

  • This is laughable as many in our group have been given a rough ride by the goons running the public petitions committee. McAveety like the rest of the thugs charged with controlling that committee is there to resist any changes proposed in petitions and regularly dismisses petitions of a serious nature and those regarding the welfare of children. He shows how interested he is by having his mind on OTHER THINGS rather than the seriousness of the petition at hand.

    The convener of the Public Petitions Committee has resigned after talking about a member of the audience in a conversation with the committee clerk, on 15 June 2010. Labour MSP Frank McAveety made comments about a woman during a gap in committee proceedings after 28 minutes, following the consideration of a new petition on Parkinson's disease.
    MSP RESIGNS OVER OGLING SCHOOLGIRL
    Frank McAveety

    OGLING MSP Frank McAveety resigned his Holyrood job in shame yesterday - after an ear-bashing from his missus for eyeing up a Parly visitor who turned out to be a schoolgirl.

    The disgraced dad-of-two stepped down from his post as convener of the Petitions Committee as well as his role as Labour's sports spokesman. We told yesterday how the 47-year-old Glasgow Shettleston MSP had been caught commenting on the girl, telling a member of staff: "There's a very attractive girl in the second row. Dark and dusky. "I'll maybe have to put a wee word out for her. She's very attractive looking, very nice, very slim. She's got that Filipino look."

    But yesterday it emerged he had been leering at an unsuspecting teenager on a work placement with Green MSP Robin Harper. And friends said his missus Anita had been left furious after seeing TV news footage of her husband drooling over the girl. A pal said: "His wife was not chuffed. In fact, she was seriously unchuffed. And I don't think the kids were too pleased to see their dad all over the TV."

    Last night a spokesman for the Green Party confirmed: "The person in question is of school age and the matter should be left at that. We are not getting into this." He added: "We will not discuss what Robin Harper's work experience assistants do during their time in Parliament." Shame-faced McAveety arrived at work early yesterday morning after a difficult evening at home. He asked for an urgent meeting with Labour leader Iain Gray and tendered his resignation. In his letter to the party chief, he said: "I came to the decision after reflecting overnight on the reports of comments I made at the Committee yesterday.

    "I would not want the incident to detract in any way from the work of the Committee and the substantial contribution I feel I have made as convener. "I am proud of the progress made during my time as convener and that it has become much more accessible to the public. "I would like to reiterate my apology for any offence which my comments may have caused." The teen intern is thought to have been watching the committee, which included Mr Harper. There is no suggestion McAveety knew the girl's age when he made the remarks about her.

    He faced an instant demand to step down by Glasgow MSP Sandra White, who branded his comments "sexist, sleazy and racist". Last night the SNP politician said: "It is even more disturbing that Labour leader Iain Gray did not act earlier considering this is a young girl Frank was talking about and Labour must have known that for some time." She added: "Frank McAveety's comments were utterly inappropriate and he has done the right thing by resigning. It's just a shame his party leader does not seem to know what that is. "Iain Gray's failure to take action or to show any leadership demonstrates his appalling lack of judgement or awareness of the serious issues raised."

  • SOURCE
  • SINISTER TACTICS TO BLOCK SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • PROBE PROVES COPS CREATED THEIR OWN WATCHDOG

    SCOTTISH JUSTICE SYSTEM NOW PROVEN TO BE AN UTTER DISGRACE
    glasgow cops Many of our groups lives have been irreparably damaged by the thugs running Scotland's legal system and who have been getting away with 'MURDER' for years. MASONIC JUDGES,LAWYERS AND COPS BEHIND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES AND TYRANNY!!!!!!! But now a licence for dodgy lawyers to screw the legal aid system even more.

    ‘Panic‘ as thousands of criminals may be freed after being quizzed without lawyer

    Thousands of criminals could be freed from jail because they were interviewed by police without a lawyer, it was claimed last night, as ministers and prosecutors braced themselves for a devastating defeat over human rights. Legal sources warned a looming UK Supreme Court ruling on suspects’ rights could tip the country’s justice system into “meltdown”, send legal aid bills soaring and require emergency legislation after the Crown Office activated contingency measures to minimise the impact of losing a test case. Labour last night urged Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill to make a statement at Holyrood on the impact of the case. Since 1984, suspects in England and Wales have been granted immediate access to a solicitor while being interviewed by police. But under Scots law, a person suspected of an imprisonable offence can be questioned without a lawyer for up to six hours.

    A Supreme Court decision, due in October, on an appeal brought by Peter Cadder – who was convicted at Glasgow Sheriff Court of two assaults and breach of the peace on interview evidence – will determine if the Scottish system breaches the right to a fair trial. If the Court rules that it does, it opens the door to thousands of appeals against past convictions. It was revealed yesterday in our sister title The Herald that Elish Angiolini, the Lord Advocate, who argued against a change at the Supreme Court, has told police chiefs to allow suspects immediate access to lawyers ahead of the Court’s ruling in October. The contingency measure was seen as a tacit admission by the head of the Crown Office that she is likely to lose the Cadder case. One senior legal source claimed the Crown Office was in a “panic” over the implications. It is understood civil servants are now preparing for possible emergency legislation at Holyrood and Westminster.

    If the Supreme Court goes against the Lord Advocate, the critical factor will be whether its ruling is retrospective, leading to old cases being reopened, or prospective, meaning it would only apply to future cases. A prospective judgment is unusual in a human rights case. Cadder’s appeal drew on a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in 2008, which said Turkish anti-terrorist police illegally denied a young protestor, Yusuf Salduz, legal assistance. The implication was that access to a lawyer was a fundamental right. Supreme Court insiders said Angiolini was counting on a recent appeal court ruling by seven Scottish judges that the Salduz case did not apply to Scotland.

    However, the Supreme Court judges dismissed the Scottish example and asked Angiolini about possible emergency legislation for Scotland. Human rights lawyer John Scott said: “The Crown approached Cadder without a plan B. This is not a new issue. Scotland has sleepwalked into this.” The Supreme Court could issue a retrospective decision applying to all cases dating back to the start of devolution in 1999. Another option would be to backdate the change to the Salduz ruling in 2008.

    Paul McBride QC said: “A decision against the Crown, especially if it is retrospective, could put hundreds if not thousands of convictions at risk, including some of the most serious cases.” But human rights solicitor Tony Kelly, who helped prisoners win compensation for slopping out, dismissed predictions of a meltdown, as only a fraction of appeals would succeed: “There’s a potential for disruption, but there are also a lot of procedural hurdles.” Labour’s justice spokesman Richard Baker said: “It’s essential that Kenny MacAskill ensures that robust contingency plans are in place. He needs to tell Parliament about those plans as a matter of urgency.”

    Conservative MSP John Lamont said if the court ruling was retrospective, Tory MSPs would help pass any emergency legislation needed. Martha Rafferty, a criminal defence lawyer with Anthony Mahon in Glasgow, said: “If the decision goes against the Crown it’s going to have ramifications for the whole criminal justice system. It will completely change the nature of inquiries made by the police.” Crown sources denied the prosecution service was in a panic or ill-prepared.

    A government spokesperson said ministers, the Crown Office, legal aid board and police had been working on contingency plans for a year. Austin Lafferty, solicitor and member of the Council of the Law Society of Scotland, said: “On one analysis it should be a fundamental right of any arrested person to have legal advice. “The problems are in two areas. Firstly, for new cases we need to know if there is going to be legal aid provision that properly funds the additional lawyer attend ance at police stations; secondly, is the right to solicitor attendance going to be retrospective? “Even if there are not wholesale acquittals … enough convicted persons considering and starting proceedings will create a very expensive logjam in the system.”

  • SOURCE
  • Scottish judiciary still showing resistance to support in court cases
  • OUR OWN STEWART McKENZIE RECEIVES WHICH? CONSUMER CHAMPION AWARD VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FORMER COUNCIL LEADER HOMOSEXUAL STEVEN PURCELL QUIZZED OVER COCAINE CLAIMS
    Steven Purcell claimed to have taken cocaine while council leader

    The former leader of Glasgow City Council has been questioned by police over his admission that he had used illegal drugs. Strathclyde Police said Steven Purcell, 37, attended an interview "voluntarily" at a police station in the city. The interview was to assist with an "ongoing criminal inquiry", the force said. Mr Purcell told a Scottish newspaper in April that he had taken cocaine.

    A police spokesman said: "Strathclyde Police can confirm that Steven Purcell attended voluntarily at a police office in Glasgow on Wednesday June 2 to assist with an ongoing criminal inquiry." Mr Purcell, who was once seen as a rising star within the Labour party, stepped down as council leader and councillor for Glasgow's Blairdardie ward in March citing "stress and exhaustion".

    It later emerged that he was treated at a private hospital specialising in drug and alcohol dependency. Mr Purcell told the Scottish Sun earlier this year he had taken cocaine a "handful" of times since he was first offered it at a party. He blamed "stupidity" for his decision to dabble with the drug, and also admitted he had problems with alcohol before he decided to step down. Mr Purcell was first elected to the council in May 1995 and served as convener of development and regeneration, then education, before becoming leader in 2005 at the age of only 32. He was named as Councillor of the Year at last year's Scottish Politician of the Year awards for his role in delivering the Commonwealth Games to Glasgow and a guaranteed "living wage" to thousands of workers.

  • SOURCE
  • CROOKED LAWYERS WITH MASSIVE LEGAL AID BILLS BEHIND DOMESTIC ABUSE SCAMS
    Radical feminist MSP's and crooked lawyers behind a recipe for men to get fleeced using draconian civil laws with little or NO evidence

    Bid launched for Scots victims of domestic abuse to get legal aid

    A MAJOR shake-up of domestic abuse law to allow Scots victims to be granted legal aid could be on the cards. Highlands and Islands MSP Rhoda Grant is urging MSPs to back her members' Bill, which would allow victims to get financial help to take out an interdict against an abuser, as well as making it a criminal offence to breach an interdict.

    The Bill would also allow a non-harassment order to be obtained after only one incident of harassing behaviour, removing the need to show a "course of conduct". Ms Grant said: "The cost of obtaining an interdict can be a huge barrier to protecting women and children from abuse. We owe it to all victims of domestic abuse to ensure that we do everything we can to make the law work for them. "As a society, we have a duty to protect people from harm and that is what I am seeking to do through this Bill. "I hope every member of the Scottish Parliament can get behind this move and ensure that these protections for women and children can become law."

  • SOURCE
  • Legal aid cases soar during the recession
  • STEWART MACKENZIE NAMED CONSUMER CHAMPION OF THE YEAR
    stewart mackenzie Stewart has been heavily involved with our own group actions and a major thorn in the side of the judiciary in Scotland

    THE man whose campaign led to the official introduction of McKenzie Friends in Scotland's courts has been named the consumer champion of the year at the 2010 Which? Awards. Stewart Mackenzie has been rewarded for his efforts in lodging a successful public petition at the Scottish Parliament that has seen the Lord President concede that lay helpers should be permitted in court.

    Last week, Lord Hamilton confirmed he had signed an Act of Sederunt to introduce the system, which is already used in other legal jurisdictions. It marked the culmination of months of campaigning by Perthshire resident Stewart Mackenzie to have the system formalised in Scotland. His efforts came up against confusion amid the Scottish courts system following an insistence by Lord Hamilton that it was already permitted on the discretion of the judiciary. Before he lodged his petition, Mr Mackenzie was part of the campaign that eventually led to the establishment of the independent Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in 2008, and praise from finance secretary John Swinney, who commended his achievement.

    Now, he is to follow in the footsteps of previous winners of the award, such as former pensions minister James Purnell and John McFall, the former chair of the Treasury select committee. Which? chief executive Peter Vicary-Smith said: "Stewart's tireless campaigning to improve legal services for Scottish consumers has helped drive the creation of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission and led directly to the imminent introduction of McKenzie Friends in Scottish courts. This makes him a worthy winner of the Which? Consumer Champion Award." Mr Mackenzie told The Scotsman he intends to launch a new campaign within months, said he was "pleased" with the award, adding: "Sadly, Scotland has a history of extreme delay in implementing legal reforms which have occurred not only in England and Wales, but also throughout other countries in the Commonwealth."

  • SOURCE
  • WHICH? OFFICIAL RELEASE
  • SCOTLANDS' NEW WORLD ORDER PLANS FOR MASSIVE INCREASES IN PARKING FINES
    Councils to get tough with motorists as parking fines set to rise to £100

    FURIOUS drivers hit back last night after city bosses threatened to impose £100 parking fines across the country. Glasgow City Council voted on Friday to raise the maximum penalty from £60. And councils in Aberdeen, Dundee and Edinburgh are expected to follow suit within months.

    The shock move sparked anger yesterday from organisations representing drivers and businesses. Luke Bosdet, of the Automobile Association, said: "For many people, a car is a vital lifeline. This is more likely to affect the less well-off, lone parents and pensioners who can't afford to park in car parks and have to park in the street. "They may then be unable to afford the fines and could end up paying even more when they are taken to court." Colin Borland, of the Federation of Small Businesses in Scotland, added: "There needs to be common sense.

    "This fear of £100 parking fines will deter people from going into city centres to do business. "Instead, they will go elsewhere. Shops and offices could close down as a result. Councils need to provide more free street parking - not impose harsher penalties." The grab for parking fines cash in Glasgow is coming despite the city failing to tackle the widespread abuse of disabled parking badges. Hundreds of motorists park for free using borrowed or stolen blue badges. Hugh Blaydon, of the Association of British Drivers, added: "Once again, the poor driver is being made the victim for society's problems. We're now fining drivers more than shoplifters. "Councils who impose £100 penalties should be voted out of office.

    "It is the type of measure that could encourage civil disobedience." Glasgow City Council say the current £60 fine isn't enough to cover increases in the cost of equipment, staff salaries and fighting appeals. Opposition councillors wanted the maximum new fine to be raised to £80 but lost the vote. Robert Booth, Glasgow City Council's director of land services, said: "We haven't increased the fine for six years. "The deterrent isn't what it used to be. It is something that has to be increased."

    Motorists hit with the new £100 fines will have it reduced to £50 if they pay within 14 days. At present, motorists who park illegally receive a £60 fine, which is reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days. Scotland's four biggest councils currently earn an estimated £15million a year from tickets. The Scottish government has, in recent months, been consulting with councils over plans to increase the level of parking fines. A government spokesman said: "The current penalty level does little to deter drivers in urban areas, where spaces are at a premium."

  • SOURCE
  • CHILD ABUSE PROBE IN SCOTTISH HIGHLANDS
    muir of ord Child sex abuse probe in Highlands village centres on 'multiple victims and suspects', police say

    A MAJOR child abuse probe is under way in a Highland village.

    Northern Constabulary have described the investigation centring on Muir of Ord as "large-scale" and said that there may be "multiple victims and suspects". And Chief Constable Ian Latimer said the inquiry into allegations at the village - which has a population of just 1812 - is "destined to be one of the largest" of its type faced by the force in recent years. The probe is expected to last for weeks and police officers from several divisions have been brought in to spearhead the investigation.

    News of the probe came in a Northern Joint Police Board agenda for a meeting due on May 11. In a section headed "child protection" the report states: "A large scale child abuse inquiry is currently being carried out in the Muir of Ord area involving multiple victims and multiple suspects. "This is likely to continue for some weeks yet and is destined to be one of the largest inquiries of its type in recent years. "The inquiry team is currently made up of Central Divisional staff taken from Lochaber, Skye & Lochalsh, Ross & Cromarty and the Western Isles." Last night, a local Church of Scotland minister reacted with shock to the major police probe. The Rev Iain Ramsden, whose church is about two miles from the village but has many Muir of Ord residents in its congregation, said: "This is an absolute shock to me.

    "Muir of Ord is a typically friendly and welcoming Highland community. It is a lovely village. "The people will be shocked and stunned that such an investigat ion will be taking place. "But it is important for all to let the police get on with their investigation and to co-operate with the police at every level.

    "Knowing the villagers the way I do, that is exactly what all of them will do in any case. "But it is important this does not turn into a witchhunt.

    "About half of my congregation is from the village and they and the rest of the congregation will be deeply shocked. All we can do is help the police in any form we can." Local SNP councillor Peter Cairns said: "It is very shocking news. No one had an idea about this. But what I would say is that allegations of this nature can happen anywhere, in any community. "All we know so far is that the investigation is centred here. Inverness is only a few miles away and we can have no way of knowing what is involved in this.

    "The police will conduct a thorough investigation and that is exactly what is required. "People will be widely concerned by this. "But it would be wrong at this stage to indulge in any form of speculation.

    "Yes, it is a concern that there may be multiple victims or suspects but the police investigation is what is important here and nothing should pre-empt that." A spokesman for the force, who probed the massive Orkney child abuse allegations of the 1990s, said he could not comment further at this stage. In 1991, nine children were removed from their homes amid allegations of satanic abuse on the islands. But in the end the case was thrown out of court and no one was ever convicted.

    A subsequent inquiry chaired by Lord Clyde was critical of the methods employed by social workers interviewing chi ldren and 194 recommendations were made. In 2003 eight people were charged after dawn raids in the Western Isles and England following allegations made by three girls. All the charges were later dropped. But in that case, a report later said that the children were victims and was critical of the initial investigation.

  • SOURCE
  • MULTIPLE VICTIMS IN CHILD ABUSE PROBE IN SCOTTISH HIGHLANDS
  • HOLLIE GREIG ABUSE CASE HERE
  • MACASKILL'S AIDE MOVES HOUSE TO GET £688 MORTGAGE PERK PER MONTH
    nigel don Kenny MacAskill’s 'ministerial aide' Nigel Don moves house to get £688 a month mortgage perk from Parliament

    Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill’s parliamentary liaison officer – Nigel Don MSP, has like a few others in the Scottish Parliament decided to milk the system and get the taxpayer to pay his mortgage. Mr Don is a member of Holyrood’s Petitions Committee and the Justice Committee … rewards perhaps for ‘gumming up’ the opposition or any potential petitions his boss doesn’t quite like ?

    The Sunday Herald reports :

    Ministerial aide moves house ... and bills taxpayers £688 a month for capital flat

    A Ministerial aide has admitted “coordinating” £765,000 in property deals to claim a controversial mortgage allowance that was about to be scrapped, reveal Paul Hutcheon and Tom Gordon. A MINISTERIAL aide has admitted "coordinating" £765,000 in property deals to claim a controversial mortgage allowance that was about to be scrapped. Nationalist MSP Nigel Don was unable to claim mortgage interest on a flat in Edinburgh as he lived in Dundee - which was too close to Holyrood for the subsidy. But the SNP politician sold his family home of 19 years, bought a house in Aberdeen and then used his new found eligibility for the taxpayer-funded perk to buy a property in the capital. The deals were completed a month before an independent review of MSP allowances backed the abolition of the mortgage scheme last year.

    Don told the Sunday Herald that his property move were a necessary part of a plan to boost the SNP's profile in marginal seats - with Dundee already represented by the SNP, the Nationalists wanted him to cover Aberdeen. The MSP, who earns £55,381 a year, also described his publicly-funded mortage perk as "one of the compensations" of the job. The revelations further discredit the Edinburgh Accommodation Allowance (EAA), which allows MSPs outwith commuting distance of the capital to charge the public for mortgage interest on a property in Edinburgh. The scheme is to be abolished in 2011.

    The Sunday Herald can reveal that Don, elected to serve the North East in 2007, only became eligible for mortgage interest after a flurry of property deals. He and his wife lived in Dundee's west end between 1989 and 2008.

    Documents from Registers of Scotland show that Don, an aide to Justice Secretary Kenny Macaskill, made himself eligible for the allowance after selling his family home for £290,000 in January 2008. Within the space of three weeks, he bought a £310,000 property in Aberdeen - which is within the radius of support for mortgage interest - and purchased a £165,000 flat in Edinburgh. He then started to bill the public for the mortgage costs on his capital flat on St Clair Road. The Justice Committee member's transactions were completed a month before an an independent review backed abolition of the mortage scheme.

    MSPs have since voted to scrap the system in 2011 and no new entrants will be allowed to enter the scheme. Don, who claimed £3281.85 in hotel costs before he became eligible for mortgage costs, can now draw on an £11,900 allowance to cover interest payments. The Parliament's expenses database shows that in February last year, the month before the scheme was flagged up for abolition, Don started to claim £688 a month in mortgage costs. In the same month, the former Dundee councillor billed the taxpayer £5089 in other costs associated with his move to Edinburgh.

    He claimed £1057 for conveyancing, £1499 in legal fees, £329 in removables, as well as £223 in surveyors' costs. As an MSP for the North East, Don is elected to represent nine constituencies in a region that runs from Dundee to Fraserburgh. However, in an interview with the Sunday Herald, Don said he moved to Aberdeen to focus on the three constituencies that do not have an SNP base. He said: "There are nine constituencies in the north east region, and the SNP has constituency members in six of them. The three which we don't are West Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen Central and Aberdeen South. At a practical level, my job is to cover those kinds of areas.

    "Those are the areas where the party is expecting me to do the work, because the party already has cover in the other constituencies." Asked whether he was aware that his move to Aberdeen would make him eligible for the mortgage perk, he said: "There's no doubt at all that, having established that if we were moving to Aberdeen, we would be eligible for some kind of accommodation allowance in Edinburgh, yes. Plainly we were aware of that. And as you say, the two were coordinated." On whether he thought claiming mortgage interest was a sweetener for moving to Aberdeen, he said: "I would describe it as one of the compensations." His property shake-up follows LibDem MSP Jamie Stone also signing up to the mortgage interest scheme at the 11th hour.

    Stone stayed in a bed-and-breakfast in Edinburgh until early 2008, when he bought a £180,000 New Town flat weeks before the independent report was published. Don's use of the allowances scheme emerged last week after the publication of Holyrood expenses, which the Sunday Herald can reveal also laid bare the practice of MSPs doling out public money to friends and colleagues. A spokesman for the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "It is shocking to that any MSP could think it was acceptable to take advantage of taxpayers' generosity in this way. It also seems a remarkable coincidence that this gentleman should move so close to the publication of the review."

    PAUL HUTCHEON'S FULL INTERVIEW WITH NIGEL DON

    PAUL HUTCHEON (PH): "Some cynincs might say your property dealings were made to make yourself eligible for mortgage interest."

    NIGEL DON (ND): "If you wanted to take that line, it would be very difficult for me to tell me you were wrong, but you are wrong. What you will realise, Paul, is that the North-East region stretches from Dundee to Fraserburgh. I was elected, much to my surprise, from my Dundee home in the very western tip of that area. It is an area far too big to cover from where I lived. What my wife and I did was to move up to Aberdeen, quite simply, to be able to do the job.

    "I think you will also recognise the practical politics of that. There are nine constituencies in the north east region, and the SNP has constituency members in six of them. The three which we don't are West Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen Central and Aberdeen South. At a practical level, my job is to cover those kinds of areas."

    PH: "So by moving to Aberdeen you were setting up a political base?"

    ND: "Those are the areas where the party is expecting me to do the work, because the party already has cover in the other constituencies."

    PH: "Were you aware that by moving to Aberdeen you were making yourself eligible for mortgage interest support?"

    ND: "There's no doubt at all that, having established that if we were moving to Aberdeen, we would would be eligible for some kind of accommodation allowance in Edinburgh, yes. Plainly we were aware of that. And as you say, the two were coordinated."

    PH: "Was claiming mortgage interest a sweetener for moving to Aberdeen?"

    ND: "I would describe it as one of the compensations, Paul...There was no way I could operate from Dundee."

    PH: "What would have prevented you from moving from Dundee to Aberdeen, but continuing to claim hotel expenses in Edinburgh, rather than mortgage interest?"

    ND: "There would have been nothing physically to prevent me from doing so. Working out of a hotel for long is desperately difficult...it's not a very good way of doing a job. Secondly, by the time you have been there for a while, it quickly adds up to same sort of bills."

    PH: "Your property dealings were completed weeks before the Langlands report backed the abolition of the mortgage interest scheme. Is this just a coincidence?"

    ND: "I was just getting on with what had to be done. I was working within the rules of the time."

    PH: "What did you mean when you said claiming mortgage interest was a 'compensation'?"

    ND: "You suggested it was a benefit, and I downgraded it to a compensation."

    PH: "Is it not fair to say that, if Labour had held Dundee West, then you would have continued to live where you were, as there would not have been an SNP base there?"

    ND: "I think that's a perfectly fair view of what might have been. It's a perfectly rational view."

  • SOURCE
  • LATEST ON PETITION 1247 McKENZIE FRIEND FOR SCOTLAND 4 MAY 2010 VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • McKENZIE FRIEND FOR SCOTTISH COURTS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • LAWYERS GIVE 'TESCO LAW' GREEN LIGHT DESPITE ACCUSATIONS OF VOTE RIGGING

    This group have been behind much of the information and evidence gathering and oral evidence given to the Scottish Parliament to seek change in the legal mafia of Scotland.

    A POTENTIALLY damaging referendum has been won narrowly by the Law Society of Scotland, heading off the first of three challenges that could alter the landscape of the Scottish legal profession. In only the third profession-wide vote in the Society's history and the first for almost 20 years, solicitors endorsed by just 20 votes its policy on legal reforms, which will allow external ownership of Scottish law firms. The largest turnout in a Society referendum saw the reforms, contained in the Scottish Government's Legal Services Bill, backed by 2,245 votes to 2,221, despite a "no" campaign led by Mike Dailly of Govan Law Centre, who had claimed the vote was "rigged". A total of 4,466 solicitors – 43 per cent of the Society's membership – voted in a secret ballot run by the Electoral Reforms Services that closed at midday yesterday. The vote was called by officials aiming to see off a rebellion over its handling of reforms that will allow the introduction of alternative business structures (ABS) – dubbed the Tesco law – to legal firms.

    Society critics believe the move, which could see legal services operated by large companies such as banks or supermarkets, would damage the profession's independence and integrity and squeeze out smaller firms. The Society now faces two further challenges as it fights to maintain the ABS policy and hold on to its role as the representative body for every solicitor in Scotland. First will come a potentially hostile special general meeting next week at which the ABS policy will be debated. The last SGM was adjourned amid rancorous scenes that saw officials accused of "shaming democracy" by closing proceedings on a technicality before a vote was held. Thereafter, the profession will cast its vote in a second referendum forced by disgruntled Society members, unhappy with the conduct of its council during the implementation of the bill. Solicitors will be asked whether the Society should be stripped of the representative role it has held for more than 60 years.

    Ian Smart, president of the Law Society, conceded the close result meant the rift surrounding ABS had yet to be fully healed. He said: "The narrowness of the result illustrates just how the issue has brought out widely divergent views across the profession. "While there have been a few heated remarks on the wider fringes of the debate, I believe the vast majority of solicitors still wish to try to find a united way forward. These results will therefore inform the ongoing policy debate which will also continue both in private and at a reconvened special general meeting." But Mike Dailly renewed his attack on the vote, insisting the wording of the question, which said "appropriate safeguards" would be put in place, was unsatisfactory.

    "The question was utterly loaded, against all international protocols about being neutral and I have complained to the Electoral Reform Society about it," he said. John McGovern, the president of the Glasgow Bar Association, added: "The Law Society has won by 0.6 per cent. The profession is clearly split. "The professional interests of high street solicitors are clearly different to the professional interests of big commercial firms. "The Law Society should recognise that it cannot continue to represent both. It's time for solicitors to have a choice about which body, if any, represents them."

  • SOURCE
  • SOME IMPORTANT LINKS WE HAVE BEEN PARTY TO

  • Scottish Parliaments Regulation of the Legal Profession Submissions
  • Written submissions to the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill
  • Stage 1 Report on the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill Volume 1 report
  • Stage 1 Report on the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill Volume 2 evidence
  • Stage 1 Report on the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Bill Volume 2 oral evidence
  • Scottish Parliament Consultation paper on replacing Members Interests Order
  • THE COLLAPSE OF GLASGOW'S POLITICAL, LEGAL AND MEDIA MAFIA

    steven purcell PR, politics and the press: A conflict of interest but no barrier to the truth

    The shockwaves eman­ating from the controversial departure of Glasgow City Council leader Steven Purcell have shaken the foundations of Glasgow’s political and business establishment. The initial facts were bad enough: allegations of drug-taking, cover-ups, incoherent ramblings, paranoia, a stay at a clinic specialising in the treatment of drink and drug problems, and finally Mr Purcell’s retreat from Scotland, reportedly for up to a year.

    Since Mr Purcell’s departure, speculation has grown ever more fevered, encompassing suggestions of a network of powerful figures working behind the scenes to influence the workings of the city. The suggestion that this so-called network includes leading figures from the media is now threatening to undermine public confidence in the integrity of the Scottish press. There have been hints that some Scottish newspapers have pulled their punches on the controversy because editors have been too close to Mr Purcell or, worse, they have been cowed into submission by Peter Watson and PR firm Media House. These suggestions have involved the Herald & Times Group, publishers of this newspaper, The Herald and the Evening Times. Other newspapers have also been referred to. We believe our readers should learn the facts here rather than read assumptions in the pages of other publications. Glasgow is a large city but its political and business centre is small. Personal and business relationships meld together, contacts extend and overlap, boundaries blur. Business dinners become social occasions, colleagues become friends. Such social networking goes on in every city in the world. It only becomes a problem when a conflict of interest arises.

    We believe our readers should learn the facts here rather than read assumptions in other publications For the Herald & Times Group that conflict of interest arose when solicitors Levy & McRae, the firm we employ to ensure the legality of our editorial content, was engaged to act on behalf of Steven Purcell in the early stages of the controversy. The Herald broke the news of Mr Purcell’s resignation as council leader in a story by Paul Hutcheon on Tuesday, March 2. Peter Watson, of Levy & McRae, and Jack Irvine, of Media House, acted for Mr Purcell as the crisis unfolded. In the most recent documents lodged with Companies House, Mr Watson is listed as one of four shareholders of Media House, along with Mr Irvine and two other individuals. Mr Watson has told us that he holds the shares as a representative of a trust for Mr Irvine’s children.

    Mr Watson and Mr Irvine denied reports that Glasgow City Council’s PR department planned to issue a statement referring to Steven Purcell’s “chemical dependency”. When released, the official statement referred only to Mr Purcell’s “stress” and “exhaustion”. They warned that a story in The Scotsman newspaper revealing details of the deleted reference to “chemical dependency” could be a breach of the Data Protection Act and be referred to the Information Comissioner. The media was also warned that inquiring into Mr Purcell’s health might breach his right to a private life under the European Convention of Human Rights. The Sunday Herald’s analysis of the Steven Purcell controversy on March 7 included an article criticising the tactics of Mr Watson and Mr Irvine. To avoid a further conflict of interest, the article was not scrutinised for legal problems by a full-time employee of Levy & McRae but by a QC acting as an independent adviser, although still under the overall umbrella of the Levy & McRae contract with the Herald & Times Group.

    After the story’s publication, the Sunday Herald was contacted separately by both Peter Watson and Jack Irvine. We will not reveal the details of private telephone calls with Peter Watson but the results of those calls could be seen in last week’s Sunday Herald. We printed a correction of one factual inaccuracy: we had said Mr Watson and Mr Irvine had left Scotland to go “on holiday” around the same time as Mr Purcell had left the country. In fact Mr Watson and Mr Irvine had both left on business trips to the Cayman Islands. We also printed a letter from Mr Watson complaining about our coverage. We agreed to print the letter to fulfil our duty to offer a right of reply. In response to separate complaints from Mr Irvine we offered the same factual correction and the same opportunity to submit a letter for publication, subject to our normal editing procedures. He refused both offers. In an article in industry magazine PRWeek on March 10, Mr Irvine revealed he had lodged a complaint with the Sunday Herald. He said he had asked for an apology and that he would refer the matter to the Press Complaints Commission if his request was refused.

    Mr Irvine has now submitted a complaint to the Press Complaints Commission against the Sunday Herald article. He has complained on two counts:

    1: By stating that he and Mr Watson had gone on holiday the Sunday Herald implied that he had left Mr Purcell “in the lurch”.

    2: The Sunday Herald launched a “vicious attack” on the methods he and Mr Watson had employed without giving either the right to comment or reply before publication, allegedly in breach of the Editor’s Code of Practice.

    Mr Irvine referred to previous “problems” he had experienced with the Sunday Herald, including discussions this newspaper had had with Mr Watson over a story concerning another Media House client earlier this year. Mr Irvine claims to the Press Complaints Commission that the Sunday Herald’s article on the Steven Purcell tactics was “heavily influenced by spite, bad blood and malice”. The Sunday Herald will defend itself against Mr Irvine’s accusations through the normal channels. There have been other references in the media to the friendship between Steven Purcell and leading newspaper editors, including Herald & Times editor-in-chief Donald Martin. Mr Martin met Mr Purcell and prominent figures in the Glasgow business community on a fairly regular basis and both were part of a network dubbed “Team Glasgow”. Mr Martin told the Sunday Herald: “I was glad to play a role in Team Glasgow along with other individuals who believed in co-operating for the good of the city. Our aim was to encourage actions which would help the city. As a newspaper editor it is an important part of my job to make contacts in the political, business and other spheres and I also believe it is part of my job to work for the good of Glasgow and indeed Scotland. There is no conflict between that aim and my commitment to publishing the facts of stories which are important to the lives of our readers.

    ‘‘The Herald broke the news of Steven Purcell’s resignation and has continued to inform our readers of the major developments in this story. We remain committed to uncovering the full facts surrounding Mr Purcell’s departure, many of which remain obscured. We will work to uncover the truth, no matter how long it may take. There is no evidence of a ‘conspiracy of silence’. Indeed, the facts render such an allegation ridiculous.” There remains the question of a conflict of interest regarding Peter Watson in his roles as legal adviser to the Herald & Times Group and as a listed shareholder in Media House. Levy & McRae’s website offers a service described as “reputation management”. It states: “With a low profile, we aim to keep our clients off the front page and take swift, effective action where required. Being networked at the highest levels and having access to major decision-makers is key to our success.” One media organisation asked the Herald & Times Group last week if such a statement could be reconciled with the aims of our newspapers. Herald & Times managing director Tim Blott said he was extremely concerned at the conflict of interest which had arisen in the Steven Purcell case. He said: “We are taking this problem very seriously and are assessing our relationship with our legal advisers this week. We certainly need to be assured that there is no potential for similar conflicts of interest in future and we are making our position very clear to Levy & McRae.”

  • SOURCE
  • Firm caught up in Purcell furore pulls out of Labour party conference
  • HOMOSEXUAL COUNCIL LEADER ADMITS COCAINE ADDICTION TO COPS
  • Cocaine, Lawyers & Politicians
  • Purcell: the end of the line
  • £25 MILLION BAIL OUT TO DODGY HOUSING ASSOCIATION
  • SECURITY THUGS EXPOSED: MURDER AND MAYHEM
  • Labour must come clean over Purcell, says SNP
  • New shock as Purcell stands down as councillor
  • Former Labour colleagues distance themselves from homosexual council leader Purcell
  • Labour donor Willie Haughey linked to cocaine city councillor
  • Homosexual Steven Purcell scandal: MSP calls for police inquiry
  • PETER WATSON Levy & McRae lawyer behind threats across the internet
  • How Peter Watson of Scottish Law Firm Levy and McRae Seems to Turn Up Everywhere
  • GAY MAFIA BURIES TORIES; Homosexual links lead to downfall of Scots party(2007)
  • More corruption exposed about Glasgow's homosexual leader
  • cia CIA CREATED HIPPIE MOVEMENT IN 60'S
    A lot of folks travelled abroad to thwart CIA operations and joining the ‘hippie’ generation. U.S. had thousands of ‘advisers’operating in Vietnam for a good many years before the arrival of the first official ground troops.
    steven purcell HOMOSEXUAL COKEHEAD PURCELL ADMITS COCAINE BLACKMAIL FEAR
    Glasgow chief executive Purcell has admitted using cocaine and told of how this may have left him open to blackmail. He also said police warned that there could be video footage of him using the drug which might be used for blackmail

    CORRUPTION AT THE HEART OF SCOTLAND

    steven purcell The sudden fall from grace of homosexual Steven Purcell as Chief Executive of Glasgow city council has been well documented here and in various national newspaper that are really only the tip of a very big corrupt iceberg.

    Here are a few dots we have joined

    Purcell and Paul McManus applied in 2003 for a licence for a pub in London the Adam and Eve. This is subject to CCTV being installed that allows the police and council officers at Southwark to have access to the footage anytime up to 31 days after ANY event SEE HERE


    adam and eve pub Paul McManus becomes head of the BECTU Union that is supposed to be in conflict with a group privatised by Glasgow City Council called the Culture and Sport Glasgow , a charity Purcell helped set up while part of Glasgow city council who acts as one of its directors alongside The First Minister at that time Jack McConnell's wife Bridget who is their Chief Executive. SEE HERE

    At a board meeting of the Culture and Sport Glasgow on the 25th Nov 2009 the following was decided
    (b) in terms of Article 43.2 of the Company's Articles of Association, Councillor Steven Purcell was removed from office by written notice to this effect. SEE HERE

    Bridget McConnell is promoted on Jack McConnell's Wiki site as
    "Personal life
    He is married to Bridget McConnell, and has two adopted children from that marriage, Hannah and Mark. Bridget is Chief Executive of Culture and Sport Glasgow, the UK's largest and most comprehensive cultural and sports charitable company. Hannah lives in London working for the British Council. Mark is a graduate of the University of Dundee, and is currently working as a teacher at Broxburn Academy teaching English." SEE HERE

    culture and sport glasgow A quite an extraordinary scenario that all the museums , sport centres and other cultural places of interest in Glasgow have been removed from Glasgow city control in a meeting where the majority of the Labour councillors voted for this change including Purcell, who then becomes a director of the NEW private charity.

    That is before his removal which was NOT discussed during the Board meeting as to the reasons. A serious conflict of interest and to the enormous disadvantage of Glasgow council tax payers. As well as Mrs McConnell being praised for her Chief Executive position she is also part of another sinister organisation the British Council that we have written about in detail and a search on our site will show the rather dubious dodgy scams they get up to on behalf of Britain's royal family who are their patrons.

    Paul McManus while suggesting he is in dispute with this private charity on behalf of his members interests meantime has been running a business with the Chief Executive Purcell of Glasgow City Council and a director of the Culture and Sport Glasgow board shows a very peculiar conflict of interest and the way Glasgow councillors have been deviously removing council control into the hands of an unelected charitable quango with financial interests and salaries that greatly remove the wealth created by these cultural features that have belonged to the Glasgow public for so long.

  • HOMOSEXUAL COUNCIL LEADER ADMITS COCAINE ADDICTION TO COPS
  • Cocaine, Lawyers & Politicians
  • Purcell: the end of the line
  • £25 MILLION BAIL OUT TO DODGY HOUSING ASSOCIATION
  • SECURITY THUGS EXPOSED: MURDER AND MAYHEM
  • Labour must come clean over Purcell, says SNP
  • New shock as Purcell stands down as councillor
  • Former Labour colleagues distance themselves from homosexual council leader Purcell
  • Labour donor Willie Haughey linked to cocaine city councillor
  • Homosexual Steven Purcell scandal: MSP calls for police inquiry
  • GAY MAFIA BURIES TORIES; Homosexual links lead to downfall of Scots party(2007)
  • WHEN WILL SCOTS SAY ENOUGH?

    steven purcell gaymafia "Whoever says Scottish politics is dull might want to take a look at last week’s unravelling saga around Labour controlled Glasgow City Council.

    Who would have thought when Gordon sat next to him on the Thursday before last that within a week one of Scotland’s up and coming politicians would have attempted suicide, that a police investigation would link the same man, Glasgow’s most senior politician, to major organised drug criminals and an 18-year-old Labour activist would be end up dead outside the city’s Council Chambers." 'SOURCE' Steven Purcell was talked about as the saviour of the Scottish Labour Party, its brightest young star, he was tipped as a future First Minister.... Yet he was in with the wrong crowd and in May last year some of Scotland’s top coppers visited Purcell in his council offices as his name had repeatedly cropped up in investigations. There was reason to believe that someone was attempting to blackmail Purcell with mobile phone footage of him.

    Fast forward to last week and as Gordon Brown was leaving Glasgow, Purcell was going into meltdown. Vodafone blocked his number after he abused call centre staff and he was found in tears talking nonsense at his desk. He ended up in the Castle Craig rehab centre. Although Purcell was earning fifty grand as council leader, you must wonder how much of this went up his nose and therefore who was paying for the rehab stay and for retaining of lawyers and crisis managers? Either way Purcell went missing from the rehab centre on Sunday night. Some have suggested he attempted to kill himself in open water as he was found soaked.

    By now the story had started to emerge in the press and by Monday the internet was rife with rumours about Purcell stepping down because of cocaine rather than the “stress” cited in the official statement. We now know that Council staff wanted to blow the whistle but were stopped by Purcell’s mysteriously funded lawyers. As the week progressed the story unravelled more, Purcell’s vain attempts at crisis management were no match for overwhelming evidence. The final straw was the collapse and subsequent death of a admirer of Mr Purcell’s, a young Labour Party activist named Danus McKinlay who “worshipped” Purcell and “would do anything for him” . Guido understands that McKinlay was diabetic and there has been reason to believe that he had stopped taking his medication resulting in his subsequent collapse. Witnesses said they thought he was drunk – an easy mistake to make of someone who desperately needs insulin. That was the final straw, within two hours Purcell had resigned as a councillor and has fled Scotland to an unknown sunny destination. Through all of this Gordon has remained silent. The ally he was once so keen to be photographed with, campaign for, tip for future greatness and fund-raise for, was left to the scrap-heap. What did Gordon know and when? " SOURCE

    Rumors are now circulating that the real scandal was the relationship that Purcell had, with the now dead young man. Even the Scottish media can't cover this one up. Diabetics don't just "drop dead" in public. Normally, a bracelet will alert medical staff, or they carry a diabetic bag with insulin and needles on them at all times. In the bag are usually glucose tablets for low blood sugar. If the rumors are true that this young man (reportedly 18 years old) was having a homo-sexual relationship with Purcell than it is very likely that this is what was caught on video, and the source of the real blackmail here.

    But, don't expect a murder investigation here. We have learned from the Holly Greig Case that Politicians and Pedophiles in Scotland prefer to sleep in the same bed. The murderers can climb in too, there is plenty of room... Unless you are a law-abiding citizen, in which case, you can sleep on the floor.

  • SOURCE
  • MORE ON GAY MAFIA HERE
  • BIG BANG FOR SCOTLAND'S LEGAL MAFIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • HOMOSEXUAL COUNCIL LEADER ADMITS COCAINE ADDICTION TO COPS

    steven purcell Steven Purcell confessed to having cocaine problem after meeting with police

    POLICE chiefs warned ex-council boss Steven Purcell that he was the target of an underworld cocaine blackmail plot. The Labour high-flier, who quit politics on Friday, was given details of the alleged extortion bid during a meeting with officers from the elite Scottish Crime and Drugs Enforcement Agency. Within weeks of the meeting, Purcell - who was then leader of Glasgow City Council - stunned friends by confessing to them that he had used cocaine in the past but had since stopped taking the Class A drug. At the meeting with the police in Glasgow City Chambers, Purcell, 37, was told that detectives had been informed about the plot during a wider investigation into some of Scotland's biggest coke barons.

    He was told one dealer had claimed to have incriminating mobile phone footage of him. The officers at the meeting were Assistant Chief Constable Johnny Gwynne and Detective Chief Superintendent Allan Moffat, head of crime support at the agency launched to tackle serious and organised crime. The politician - seen as a rising star in his party before his dramatic resignation last week citing stress and exhaustion - told the officers that he was unaware of any attempt to blackmail him. He was not asked by the officers whether he had used the drug. A police source said: "The purpose of the meeting was to establish whether he was being blackmailed. "The SCDEA were made aware of a dealer claiming to have evidence of drug use which would have destroyed his career. "It was taken seriously and a meeting was arranged shortly after the claims emerged. "Mr Purcell told detectives that he was not aware of any such blackmail attempt.

    "As far as the police were concerned that was the end of the matter as far as he was concerned." Shortly after the meeting on May 12 last year, Purcell moved from the flat he owned in Yoker, near Glasgow, and moved into a new rented home in the city's west end. Purcell quit his position leading Scotland's biggest local authority on Monday, the day after checking into Castle Craig hospital in Peebles, which specialises in treating drink and drug problems. Media advisers employed just before he quit said claims that the council had planned to cite "a chemical dependency" as the reason for his resignation were "without foundation".

    Friends who spoke to the former council leader last week became increasingly worried by his mood swings and erratic outbursts. Mobile phone giants Vodafone contacted the council last week to complain Purcell had shouted at their staff in calls to their offices. On Friday - four days after resigning as council leader - Purcell announced that he would also be standing down as a councillor. Later, a friend of the politician, who was working with the council, died after collapsing in the street close to the City Chambers.

    Danus McKinlay, 18, is thought to have had diabetes and asthma. Police said there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding his death. Purcell then left Scotland on Friday for a secret location to escape the fallout from his dramatic decision to quit. It is still unclear if any single event triggered his collapse a week ago. Purcell, who had been tipped as a future First Minister, spent much of his last week in office on an official trip to London with political colleagues. He returned to Glasgow on Thursday, February 25, and attended a Labour Party fundraiser at Glasgow's Hilton hotel.

    The following day, he missed a meeting with restaurant tycoon Charan Gill and colleagues became aware he was increasingly distressed on Saturday. He was visited by friends before travelling to Castle Craig last Sunday. Towards the end of the week, he had left the clinic and was back with friends and family in Glasgow. The SCDEA said: "Other than individuals for whom criminal proceedings have been concluded, the SCDEA has a long-standing policy of not confirming the details of any individuals who they may have had contact with in carrying out their day-to-day work to disrupt and dismantle serious organised crime."

    A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said: "Councillor Purcell had a private meeting with two police officers in his office at the City Chambers on May 12, 2009." Purcell's PR firm, Media House, said: "Mr Purcell has now removed himself from Glasgow politics and is resting and recuperating. He has nothing further to say." Purcell joined Labour at the age of 14 and was elected to the council in May 1995.

    He was once described as a "visionary" by Tony Blair and opponent Alex Salmond paid tribute to him after he resigned. He announced in 2006 that he was splitting with wife Katrina and came out as gay.

    DAY BY DAY

    February 23-25 - Purcell is in London on council business staying at the Holiday Inn in Kensington.

    February 25 - Attends a Labour party fundraiser at Glasgow's Hilton Hotel with Prime Minister Gordon Brown. February 26 He cancels an appointment with curry king Charan Gill then tells colleagues he wants to quit as leader and fears a plot against him. They express concerns about his state of mind.

    February 27 - He is visited at home by his advisers concerned about his erratic behaviour. February 28 Purcell is driven to Castle Craig Hospital. He goes missing from the clinic - sparking a police search - but later returns.

    March 1 - Council PR team is ready to release a statement saying his decision to quit was because of a "chemical dependency". He resigns as leader after hiring media relations firm who claim he is "stressed".

    March 3 - It is reported that Purcell is telling close pals that he intends to return to politics in the future. He leaves Castle Craig.

    March 5 - He announces he's standing down as a councillor and flees to a secret location.

  • SOURCE
  • How Peter Watson of Scottish Law Firm Levy and McRae Seems to Turn Up Everywhere
  • Cocaine, Lawyers & Politicians
  • Purcell: the end of the line
  • £25 MILLION BAIL OUT TO DODGY HOUSING ASSOCIATION
  • SECURITY THUGS EXPOSED: MURDER AND MAYHEM
  • Labour must come clean over Purcell, says SNP
  • New shock as Purcell stands down as councillor
  • Former Labour colleagues distance themselves from homosexual council leader Purcell
  • Labour donor Willie Haughey linked to cocaine city councillor
  • SCOTLANDS LEGAL MAFIA STILL FIGHTING CHANGE TO THEIR CORRUPT MONOPOLY

    lord hamilton Criticism for McKenzie Friends U-turn

    CONSUMER body Which? has stepped up the pressure on Scotland's top judge, by raising concerns about aspects of his plan to introduce McKenzie Friends in Scottish Courts. Last week, Lord Hamilton performed a U-turn by indicating that he would now allow people representing themselves in civil cases to be accompanied by another person to help them navigate the case.

    His announcement came after campaigner Stewart Mackenzie laid a petition before the Scottish Parliament calling for McKenzie Friends to be allowed in civil cases in a similar system to that already employed in England. But Mr Mackenzie expressed outrage at the conditions to be placed on McKenzie Friends, accusing the judge of putting the Scottish legal system "back into the dark ages" with the proposals. The Lord President is set to impose rules on the system to compel Mckenzie Friends to sign a certificate outlining their "relevant" legal experience and declaring if they are related to the litigant.

  • SOURCE
  • MORE SCOTTISH INJUSTICE HERE
  • TOP JUDGE PUTTING SCOTLAND IN DARK AGES WITH REFORM BLOCK

    lord hamilton SCOTLAND'S top judge has been accused of putting the Scottish legal system "back into the dark ages" in an escalating row over the help afforded to party litigants in civil court cases.

    Campaigner Stewart Mackenzie claims Lord Hamilton is obstructing legal reform by placing unreasonable conditions on the use of "McKenzie friends" in Scotland's courts. Mr Mackenzie has lodged a petition in the Scottish parliament calling for the introduction of a system that allows people representing themselves in civil court actions to nominate a lay helper to help them take notes, organise papers or prompt them with questions for witnesses.

    The system, named after a litigant in an 1970 English divorce case, is widely operated in courts in England, Canada and New Zealand, but its official introduction has so far been resisted by the judiciary in Scotland's courts. In November, Scotland's most senior judge, Lord Hamilton, wrote to the Scottish Parliament's petitions committee insisting legislation to introduce McKenzie friends was not necessary, as Scottish judges already had the power to allow the use of lay helpers. But court officials later denied this was the case, and a letter submitted to the petitions committee this week suggested the Lord President had performed a U-turn, as he indicated the rules in Scottish courts would now be amended to allow McKenzie friends. Petitioner Stewart McKenzie, of Perthshire, has now hit out at the judge's proposals, criticising the conditions Lord Hamilton intends to place on the operation of the new system. Under the changes to be agreed at the Court of Session Rules Council on 10 May, McKenzie friends will be forced to sign a certificate outlining their "relevant experience" in court as well as declaring whether they are related to the party litigant.

    Mr Mackenzie told The Scotsman: "There are a couple of serious issues that mean Lord Hamilton is going to put us back into the dark ages with what he proposes. "A McKenzie friend could be your brother, your sister, your granny, it could be a pal who is a plumber. None of them have relevant experience, so goodness knows where this comes from." He went on: "The other thing he says is a McKenzie friend must state whether he or she is related to the litigant. You might have your brother, your sister, your auntie or your granny helping you. Relationship to the litigant has got nothing to do with it."

    Mr Mackenzie, who has now been asked to provide his reaction to Lord Hamilton's proposals, added: "Scotland has a history of obstructing any changes in law." Murdo Fraser MSP, who sits on the petitions committee, said: "It is difficult to see why the court would have an interest in what the experience is of the lay assistant, or whether or not they were related to the litigant. I would want to know what Lord Hamilton's reasoning was for stipulating these particular requirements." A spokesman for the Lord President refused to comment.

  • SOURCE
  • Scotlands legal mafia try and derail 'Tesco law'(the biggest criminals of all)
  • SCOTLAND'S TOP JUDGE STUTTERING AND STAMMERING THROUGH SPEECH
  • JUSTICE FOR SCOTS? NOT FROM THIS OLD HOUSE VIDEO
  • HOW SCOTLAND'S FIRST MINISTER FLOGS HIS MUTTON VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • ITS THE SYSTEM THAT STINKS

    A blogger has been charged with breach of the peace in relation to emails he sent to Mike Russell a member of the government. Beyond these bare facts I make no comment as the matter may be sub-judice. (This is an absurdity. The case will never go before a jury and it is plain daft to think that any sheriff will be influenced by anything I write. However I fear our absurd laws of contempt. I make it clear that I comment only on the process of the law. I do not comment on the case.)

    I saw this coming. A few months back I wrote about it. Here’s what I said. “There is no better way for the government, any government, to silence its critics such as this blog than by directing the Lord Advocate to prosecute one of us for almost any crime you care to name. The cost of the defence and the worry of it would be enough to silence most of us. Do not close your mind. We live in dangerous times.”

    Here is the danger simply stated.

    Who advises the government on matters of law?
    The Lord Advocate

    Who brings prosecutions in this country?
    The Lord Advocate

    Who employs the Lord Advocate?
    The Government (Subject to ratification by Parliament)

    Who pays the Lord Advocate
    The Government

    Who can sack the Lord Advocate?
    The Government (Subject to ratification by Parliament)

    Who can find a nice job for the Lord Advocate if she is sacked?
    The Government

    Who stands between us and the arbitrary authority of the Government?
    The Lord Advocate if you believe in fairies.

    How can the Lord Advocate protect us? By being totally independent of the Government as I have suggested should be the case elsewhere. How does she protect us? By telling any Government minister who comes to her with a trivial complaint to go and chase himself.

    How likely is she to do this if she relies on the Government for her job? Your answer is as good as mine but one thing is clear. No one should be put in the position of having the whole weight of the law in their hands to protect their employers or any one of them. The very least she should have is security of tenure. You will note how carefully I have framed every word in this article. In a free society I shouldn’t have to. I should be free to criticize any officer of government who wields power. I therefore affirm the following:

    In the whole matter:-

    Elish Angiolini the Lord Advocate smells as sweetly as the perfume she buys across the counter in Boots the Chemists. Mike Russell the Minister smells as sweetly as his aftershave and I will bring any girl who has ever kissed him to testify to this. It’s the system that stinks.

    Postscript

    I should be grateful if those reading would remember that the Lord Advocate, despite her title, is an employee of the Government, not a member. It is not for her to solve the mystery of her job description which baffles us all. Kenny MacAskill, the Minister of Justice is the person responsible to the electorate for defining her position, not Elish Angiolini whom I feel is often unfairly blamed for making the best of an impossible position. The position holds many anomolies. For example if Westminster and Scotland should be involved in litigation who represents whom? If Westminster wishes a search warrant, as Mrs Thatcher did in the Spycatcher case, would Westminster expect the Lord Advocate of Scotland to act? If Westminster believes that someone, for example myself, should be prosecuted for suborning soldiers from fighting in England’s wars and the Lord Advocate refuses to prosecute what remedy does Westminster have?

    In all these matters the Advocate General is powerless, but Kenny MacAskill is not. It is for him to define the Lord Advocate’s duties and to seek amending legislation if necesary yet he remains silent.

  • SOURCE
  • CIVIL WAR BREAKS OUT WITHIN LEGAL MAFIA OF SCOTLAND

    There is NO DOUBT members of this group have played a MAJOR part in triggering the infighting within the legal mafia of Scotland who have been getting away with absolute murder for far to long. Despite all our efforts they continue to play silly buggers with the many lives they touch. A few of our members still heavily embroiled in battles in their dens of iniquity and others still recovering after many years of legal abuse triggered by these monsters. EVIL OPERATING AT ITS EXTREME

    Solicitor calls for vote on Law Society split

    THE body that represents Scotland's lawyers is facing a damaging split, with calls for a referendum among solicitors to form a breakaway "trade union". The Law Society of Scotland is currently undergoing the biggest shake-up in its 60-year history, with a new constitution set to be adopted. The society's powers to "police" the industry could also be radically altered by reforms being put forward by justice secretary Kenny MacAskill.

    Now senior legal figures are campaigning for a new body to be set up to represent solicitors, separate from the Law Society. John McGovern, the newly elected president of Glasgow Bar Association, has called for a full referendum of all solicitors to determine whether the Law Society should continue in its representative role. "I am now of the view that, if solicitors are to have any control over their profession in the future, there has to be a Solicitors' Representative Association, independent of the Law Society," he said.

    "I call upon the Law Society to allow a referendum of all Law Society of Scotland members – a true referendum: one solicitor, one vote, secret ballot, no proxies and no three-line whips from the big commercial law firms." Mr McGovern went on: "The question? Should representation of the solicitors' profession be independent of the Law Society of Scotland?" Mr McGovern claims that the legal profession has been "downgraded" since devolution and solicitors need a more active organisation to voice their concerns. He also claims the new Legal Services Bill being brought forward by Mr MacAskill will allow government ministers to appoint members of the Law Society's ruling council – diluting the influence of solicitors.

    He said the society would effectively be put into "semi-retirement" if the bill was approved. He said: "In its 60th year, the Law Society has been forced into semi-retirement, literally a 'consultant' to its own governing council, having granted a power of attorney to the public and the Scottish ministers." The Law Society of Scotland last night said a referendum of members could go ahead if there was enough demand.

    A spokeswoman said: "If a sufficient number of members place a requisition for a referendum to take place, then the society would present that to all 10,000 members." Ian Smart, president of the Law Society, said solicitors would be better served remaining within the current organisation.

    He said: "Maintaining regulation and representation within one organisation means the society is better able to represent the best interests of its members, knowing that we are acting for a group that is effectively regulated." The outspoken comments by Mr McGovern came as MSPs at Holyrood prepared to debate the Legal Services Bill today.

    SHAKE-UP STARTS

    THE biggest shake-up of the legal profession in 60 years begins its journey through the Scottish Parliament today. The Legal Services (Scotland) Bill is an attempt by justice secretary Kenny MacAskill to bring the country's legal system into the 21st century. The main plank of the bill is a loosening of rules around ownership of legal companies, allowing "Tesco-law" firms to be set up – not necessarily owned by lawyers.

    Currently in Scotland, only solicitors can own law firms and form partnerships with other solicitors. Law Society of Scotland president Ian Smart said: "This debate needs the contribution of the entire profession as well as the wider public."

  • SOURCE
  • GLASGOW'S MASONIC THUG COPS TURN CITY INTO POLICE STATE

    glasgow cops Glasgow's thug masonic cops are using a clampdown in the city on drugs and knife crime to turn Glasgow into a police state.

    Having witnessed the massive presence at Glasgow's central station were every entrance was covered with up to six cops and large metal detectors it can only be described as completely over the top policing and similar to the tactics used by the gestapo. Very threatening and intimidating as these cops have proven they do not protect the public in any shape or form.

    * Ring of steel around city centre
    * There will be a strong police presence
    * A strong police presence will be visible in and around Glasgow city centre
    * Stop-and-search blitz over armed thugs and drugs

    Suspected criminals will be stopped and searched on their way into Glasgow city centre tomorrow in a bid to target lawlessness and anti-social behaviour. More than 160 additional officers from Strathclyde Police and the British Transport Police (BTP) will use metal detectors to target known troublemakers and suspects, whether they are in cars or using public transport.

    The aim is to create a “ring of steel” around the city centre to prevent weapons and drugs being circulated and to reduce robberies and assaults. The force’s figures show that robbery is 6% higher from November to January than it is during the summer. It is thought the seasonal increase is partly as a result of dark nights and the influx of Christmas shoppers. We know who we are looking for and which vehicles to stop so says Detective chief superintendent Campbell Corrigan

    Number plate recognition machines, which can check up to 3000 plates an hour, will be used to alert officers to routes suspects are taking towards the city. Those flagged for gang fighting or suspected of carrying weapons or drugs will be stopped and searched. Community safety wardens, taxi stewards and door staff will also be on alert with mobile CCTV vans and hand-held metal detectors. Detective chief superintendent Campbell Corrigan, who is leading the operation, said that for some people this might be the only time in the year that they come into the city centre at night and that ensuring their safety is paramount.

    “The most important thing to stress is that this is aimed at making people feel safer,” he said. “The operation will be intelligence-led. We know who we want to target and the routes they are likely to take into the city. “It is about preventing bad people coming into the city and ensuring those coming in for their Christmas shopping and nights out can go about their business safely.” Major routes leading from outlying towns and housing estates all around the city will be covered in the operation.

    The police chief continued: “We know who we are looking for and will know which vehicles we want to stop. “Members of the public will not be unfairly targeted. We will be targeting known hotspots and transit routes.” The operation will use around 12 portable metal detectors, many of which were paid for by the Scottish Government.

    The Scottish Government announced last month that it had spent £90,000 on 16 detectors for Scotland’s police forces. Unlike arched detectors, the new pole-shaped devices can be quickly moved and set up in less than a minute, have a 360-degree range and can detect knives being carried within 10ft of the machine. Kenny MacAskill, the Justice Secretary, said the new portable metal detectors would significantly cut the risk of knives being carried in town and city centres at night. Operation Rose is based on similar campaigns mounted in London and Liverpool. Such campaigns saw a significant improvement in feelings of public safety.

    The Merseyside operation stopped 677 vehicles and resulted in 89 arrests. Operation Rose will be repeated across other areas and towns over the coming weeks.

  • SOURCE
  • The snapping of trust against UK's thug cops
  • Cops heavy-handed use of anti-terror laws making innocent people feel like criminals
  • Masonic cop U-turn on photographers and anti-terror laws
  • ABERDEEN NED CAUGHT STEALING FROM CAR VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • HISTORICAL DECISION FIRST MCKENZIE FRIEND GRANTED IN SCOTTISH COURT

    scottish flag LATEST ON STEWART MacKENZIE'S PETITION on a McKenzie FRIEND for court hearings in Scotland

    Petition HERE

    Submissions including group submissions HERE

    On friday 20 November 2009 Lord Woolman granted Martin Wilson the McKenzie friend facility, the first in Scottish history.


    Case Number A162801

    Wilson Martin v North Lanarkshire Council at the Court of Session Edinburgh

    THIS BREAKS THE BACK OF THE CORRUPT MONOPOLY THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND HAVE HAD OVER PROCEEDINGS IN OUR COURTS. A MAJOR VICTORY FOR ALL OUR EFFORTS IN DEFEATING THE FRAUDSTERS.
    Also a special thanks to Stewart for creating the petition and support that has ensured this turned into a victory against the great injustices so many Scottish victims have endured, many are on this group.
  • TOP SCOTS MASONIC JUDGE LIES TO PARLIAMENT ON MCKENZIE FRIEND ISSUE

  • HOLLIE TELLS COPS SHE WAS ABUSED BY SHERIFF

    hollie greig Grampian Police have reinterviewed a disabled woman who claims she was abused as a child by an Aberdeen paedo-phile ring which included a senior police officer and a leading Scottish sheriff.

    Hollie Greig, 29, who has Down’s Syndrome, claims she was abused for 14 years from the age of six, and has given police the names of some of the men she says assaulted her. Hollie and her mother, Anne, have been campaigning since 2000 when police were first informed of the alleged abuse, for criminal proceedings to be taken against those she says were involved. The abuse is alleged to have taken place in Aberdeen, and Hollie and her mother claim to have made a statement at Bucksburn police station in July 2000 naming a senior police officer, who has since died, and a sheriff who still serves.

    The Press and Journal knows the identities of both men but has decided not to make them public at this stage. No charges have ever been brought, although Hollie received £13,500 compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in April this year. It is understood that followed evidence from a Grampian detective inspector who described Hollie as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim”.

    Last night, Mrs Greig, 58, said her daughter has had nightmares and suffered panic attacks since she first told her mother about the alleged abuse nine years ago. “We’ve been battling this for a long time now and we are angry with the way things were handled right from the start,” she said. “We were practically forced out of our home in Aberdeen and fled to Shropshire when this whole thing came to light. During these past nine years myself and Hollie have been called liars and had to put up with constant insults but we will continue to fight despite the endless brick walls we hit.”

    Mrs Greig said she ordered two psychological reports on Hollie to dismiss claims she had invented the allegations. “Hollie was asked to draw pictures and describe sexual acts to see if there was any signs she might be lying. “Both reports, carried out by two separate doctors, came back saying that 100% she was telling the truth and had been sexually abused.”

    Mrs Greig said Hollie’s campaign would continue until justice has been done. “All Hollie wants is justice. She says this has ruined her childhood. She doesn’t trust anyone and I’m the only person she can be around for any length of time.” Mrs Greig said two officers from Grampian Police visited Hollie in September and spent three-and-a-half hours interviewing her at a special facility in Shrewsbury. Hollie and her mother, who moved to Shropshire to escape the alleged abuse, have enlisted a group of high-profile supporters, including, it is understood, singer Annie Lennox, to support their demand for a prosecution.

    Mrs Greig claims that two of the alleged abusers moved to Portugal a number of years ago and that she went to her local police station in Shrewsbury to pass on that information when news broke of the kidnapping of Madeleine McCann. Madeleine, who was three at the time, was kidnapped from her family’s holiday apartment at Praia da Luz, in the Algarve, in 2006. Police believe she was taken by a paedophile. One of Hollie’s supporters wrote to the Crown Office in Edinburgh earlier this year querying the decision not to prosecute and received a reply from Andrew McIntyre, Head of Victims and Diversity, setting out the criteria for determining whether to bring charges.

    His reply suggested that, in Hollie’s case, the decision was based on the lack of independent corroboration. Mr McIntyre gave an assurance that police were continuing to investigate “aspects of the case” and said that the ongoing inquiries prevented him from commenting further. Grampian Police last night confirmed the force was investigating an allegation of historic sex abuse.

    A Crown Office spokes-woman said late last night: "We have not received any report from the police. “If we do receive a report it will be carefully considered in due course."

  • SOURCE
  • MORE ON HOLLIE GREIG'S CASE HERE
  • BBC Hides Truth of Handicapped Girl's Abuse
  • ‘The Firm’ censored, now apologise over Lord Advocate 'allegations' in Hollie Greig abuse scandal as Police investigate Aberdeen Paedophile ring
  • PAYOUT FOR SEX ABUSE VICTIM YET NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED

    hollie greig Shropshire woman has been awarded criminal injuries compensation after she was sexually abused even though no-one has been charged or brought before the courts over it.

    Medical evidence showed that 28-year-old Hollie Greig, who has Downs Syndrome, was a victim of abuse and had undergone a traumatic experience. Hollie and her mother Anne Greig fled from Aberdeen when Anne discovered what had been happening. They came to live in Shropshire eight years ago.

    The two have been fighting to bring the man they said caused the abuse to justice but say no charges have ever been brought. They say Hollie had been the victim of a paedophile ring since the age of six, for 14 years, before she moved to Shropshire. Now the two are calling on Grampian police to re-investigate the allegations.

    Speaking at her home yesterday, Hollie said she was pleased that her case had been made public. Her 58-year-old mother said the criminal injuries compensation of £13,500 that her daughter had just received from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority was a confirmation that people believed her. “It is not the money that is important. It is a way of protecting her in the future against the person or people that abused her,” she said;. “These people are still walking about free to abuse other children.”

    “I was accused of putting the allegations into my daughter’s head and was even sectioned and taken to hospital and my daughter taken into care.” A letter written by Detective Inspector Iain Allen from the community protection and investigation team at Grampian Police, to the criminal injuries compensation authority said: “Officers who have dealt with Hollie have taken the view she was a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim.

    “She appears to have been distressed by what happened to her. This would have been particularly traumatic for such a vulnerable person.” Grampian Police Chief Inspector Murray Main today said: “Decisions in Scotland on whether or not to prosecute are the responsibility of the Procurator Fiscal. “If any new evidence was to come to light we would re-open the investigation.”

  • SOURCE
  • MORE ON HOLLIE GREIG'S CASE HERE
  • BBC Hides Truth of Handicapped Girl's Abuse
  • ‘The Firm’ censored, now apologise over Lord Advocate 'allegations' in Hollie Greig abuse scandal as Police investigate Aberdeen Paedophile ring
  • CROWN CHALLENGED OVER PAEDOPHILE RING ACTIVITY INVOLVING SERVING JUDGE

    The mother of Hollie Greig, a Downs syndrome girl at the centre of an alleged paedophile abuse ring, has called for an investigation into the role played by Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini almost ten years ago, when Angiolini served as a district Procurator Fiscal. A serving Sheriff who is still in post and a now deceased police officer have been named as part of the girl’s ring of abusers. Anne Greig believes the investigation has been effectively blocked.
  • FULL EXTENDED ARTICLE HERE
  • BBC Hides Truth of Handicapped Girl's Abuse
  • Down’s syndrome victim identifies Sheriff & Police in Aberdeen Paedophile ring as Grampian Police investigate claims of historical abuse
  • Hollie tells police she was abused by sheriff
  • COUNCILLOR CRITICAL OF MASONIC CHIEF CONSTABLE CHARGED WITH FIDDLING EXPENSES

    ian oliver COUNCILLOR WAS LATER ACQUITTED AFTER THIS SORDID ABUSE OF POWER BY A MASONIC CHIEF CONSTABLE.
    (FROM 1998)

    SECRET surveillance of two councillors began because one of them was an outspoken critic of controversial police chief Ian Oliver, it was claimed yesterday.

    Brian Topping and Ian Tait are on trial charged with fiddling council expenses, but claim they have been victimised. Mr Topping's solicitor, George Mathers, told Aberdeen Sheriff Court his client became the subject of surveillance around the same time he was involved in a series of police board meetings to decide the disgraced chief constable's future. 'Someone has gone to inordinate lengths and incredible expense to discredit one or both of these men,' said Mr Mathers. The SNP councillors are alleged to have claimed individual travelling expenses after sharing a car on the 92-mile round trip between their Fraserburgh homes and Aberdeen on three occasions. Officials secretly filmed the pair as they left meetings at Aberdeen City Council's headquarters. David Hughes, the authority's chief auditor, said recordings were made of the two men as they left the council HQ in February and March this year.

    Mr Topping was widely regarded as Dr Oliver's most vocal critic at that time, when the Grampian Chief Constable was embroiled in a row over calls for him to quit. Mr Mathers said: 'Councillor Topping, on occasions when he thought it was necessary, was outspoken with regard to the chief constable.' It was also suggested by Mr Math-ers, and by Mr Tait's defence agent Gordon Macgregor, that Mr Tait had become the subject of surveillance because he questioned possible irregularities in the expenses claims of the council' finance director, Alex McLean. Mr Hughes denied he had been directed by the finance director to get evidence 'to nail' the men, and to get police involved so the councillors could be 'publicly pilloried'.

    Mr Topping, 43, and Mr Tait, 55, deny fraud. The trial before Sheriff Colin Harris continues.

  • SOURCE
  • CROOKED LAWYER JAILED FOR EMBEZZLING £400,000 FROM DEAD WOMAN'S ESTATE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • LEGAL ACTIVIST JIM DUFF ROCKS DUMFRIES'S ESTABLISHMENT BOAT

    jim duff OUR OWN JIM DUFF ROCKING THE ESTABLISHMENT BOAT

    No doubt Dumfries masons in the council, judiciary and cops are responsible for the thieving of Jim's land now worth many millions. Jim is a long term activist who behind the scenes and with his great humility has been doing more harm to Scotlands corrupt legal mafia than most.

    A man who has spent 20 years plus exposing the scumbag crooks stealing and destroying many victims of their scams . Jim remains resolute in his battles for justice and immensely articulate and absolutely brilliant at creating the legal papers that have challenged so many of these crooks in their own dens of iniquity.

    Dumfries council like virtually every council across Scotland is run by masons who are being used to attack legal and political activists. In some cases throwing activists onto the street and bankrupting them to thwart any legal actions that may seek compensation like Jim.He has lost millions from land theft by the crooks who, across Scotland, have been destroying its infrastructure using the most sinister , evil and devious scams.

  • JAMES DUFF BATTLES WITH LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND OVER £20,000,000 FRAUD
  • MORE ACTIVIST ATTACKS HERE
  • THE HYPOCRISY OF GOVERNMENT

    child migrants The Prime Minister is to apologise for forced deporting of children from 1930 to 1970. But they are still at it. Social services are still snatching children and telling them falsely that their families do not want them and also telling grandparents and extended family that the children do not want to see them either. (Parental Alienation) This confuses and demoralises children into accepting forced adoption to complete strangers. An excellent cost cutting business plan! But children are not commodities.

    Extract from the ‘Social Work Action Magazine’ Social work conference.

    Quote “Social workers said they did not become SW so that they could be ‘case managers or have to make decisions based on money rather on what was needed” End Quote.

    He will combine it with an apology to the 7,000 child migrants from Britain who still lives in Australia. As they were compulsorily shipped out of Britain, many of the children were told - wrongly - their parents were dead, and that a more abundant life awaited them. Many parents did not know their children, aged as young as three had been sent to Australia. Child care agencies (guess who they are) worked with the government to send disadvantaged children to a rosy future and supply what was deemed "good white stock" to a former colony.

  • Full story HERE
  • Australia to say sorry to abused British child migrants

  • Jimmy Deuchars, Grandparents Apart UK, 22 Alness Crescent, Glasgow G52 1PJ, 0141 882 5658

  • http://www.grandparentsapart.co.uk
  • SCOTTISH DEVOLUTION WAS A CON TRICK BY LAWYERS

    scottish parliament Donald Dour LAWYER and Law Society place man set up devolution for the exclusivity of legal parasites and at the utter expense of ordinary Scots, lawyers took over the running of the Labour party. DEVOLUTION was a con on Scotland that lawyer BLAIR allowed LAWYERS like Dewar to add another tier of Goverment run almost entirely by lawyers.

    Blair also part of the New World Order plans to create a World Government controlled by lawyers for the exclusive protection of the illuminati.
    QUESTION

    How many lawyers sit as MSP's in the Scottish Parliament the general public know little about?

    How many lawyers conjure up the flawed legislation at the Scottish Executive offices?

    How many lawyers are behind the massive surveillance network that includes the data collected by every agency across the UK on Scottish citizens?

    How many lawyers will use that data to fleece you of your home and possessions on your first enforced visit to Scotlands secret star chamber family/civil courts?

    We have made formal complaints to the Data Protection officer on this matter though as both he and the information commissioners office have lawyers working as investigation officers there is not much chance in the short term of having an investigation into the part lawyers are playing in damaging the victims of their scams.

    Many many Scots unaware of how these parasites operate in a corrupt monopoly and totally against the best interests of the ordinary people of Scotland and any who have managed to create a small piece of wealth that will immediately come under threat when they cross the threshold of civil/family courts .

    THIS IS A MONSTROUS ATTACK AGAINST US ALL FROM A SMALL SELF APPOINTED ELITE GROUP OF THIEVING BULLYING LEGAL PARASITES.

    LAWYER CLEARED IN RENT BOY QUIZ

    haggarty A LEGAL Aid boss, who was arrested in a toilet with a rent boy, has kept his job and won't be struck off as a lawyer.Douglas Haggarty, 58, was found with the teenager by security guards in British Home Stores in the St Enoch Centre, Glasgow, in January. The head of legal services at the Scottish Legal Aid Board, where his duties include lecturing lawyers on their conduct, was charged with soliciting in a public place.

    But his lawyer, Paul McBride, QC, claimed there was not enough evidence and charges were dropped.The Crown Office said Haggarty had been dealt with by a direct measure but would not say whether it was a warning letter, fine or other penalty. Now the Law Society of Scotland have revealed he will face no professional sanctions.

    The high-flying lawyer, who lives in Glasgow's Merchant City, went off sick from work after the incident but is understood to have been back for several months. A Law Society spokesman said: "The society's client care committee took account of the fiscal's decision and reasons for it." A SLAB spokesman said: "It would be inappropriate for the board to comment on a matter personal to a member of staff."Charges against the teenager were also dropped.

  • SOURCE
  • LEGAL AID CHIEF ARRESTED WITH RENT BOY IN SHOPPING CENTRE TOILET
  • Law chief held with rent boy (Scanned newspaper clip)
  • Scotland's 'rent boy’ justice system under investigation
  • GAY JUDGES AND LAWYERS GIVE SPECIAL TREATMENT TO HOMOSEXUAL CROOKS

    Fettesgate: 'Magic Circle' spells panic in the police

    IT started out as whispers between lawyers over boozy lunches and mutterings of discontent in police canteens. A group of gay judges and lawyers were conspiring to ensure soft treatment for homosexual criminals, or so went the rumour that spread through Edinburgh legal circles in the late 1980s.

    The talk was of a "magic circle" reaching the highest levels of the Scottish legal system and the potential blackmail of judges by "rent boys".

    The gossip grew on the back of police frustration at the outcome of a series of fraud and other cases, where officers felt that defendants who happened to be gay had been unusually leniently treated. It would all no doubt have died a quiet death if it were not for the bizarre events which took place one Sunday night at the police headquarters at Fettes. At around midnight on July 19, 1992, an intruder slipped in through an open window – which was apparently left unlatched by detectives who used it as a shortcut to the car park – and made his way to the offices of the Serious Crime Squad.

    Daubing Animal Liberation Front slogans on the walls as a smokescreen, he spent two hours searching the offices, including that of Deputy Commander Jimmy Smith, before making off with a haul of confidential files. Among the two holdalls full of missing documents were ones listing details of police informants, Loyalist sympathisers and Animal Liberation Front activists, but there was one particular police report which would cause huge embarrassment to the force. It examined the alleged existence of the so-called "magic circle" within the highest echelons of the Scottish judiciary.

    Written by a respected senior detective, Detective Inspector Roger Orr, it concluded there was evidence to support claims that justice was being seriously subverted by "a well-established circle of homosexuals", including judges, sheriffs and lawyers. Significantly, the report named names. The police dossier listed five court cases where the outcome caused concern among officers and lawyers and concluded that "homosexuality may well have been used as a means to seriously interfere with the administration of justice". Now there was panic at police headquarters. The possibilities – including a potential goldmine for blackmailers and the undermining of public faith in the judicial system – did not bear thinking about.

    Derek Donaldson, 32, a convicted fraudster and valued police informant, was quickly identified as the prime suspect. Frantic efforts were made to recover the documents – attempts that would lead to the downfall of some of Lothian's top detectives. One former senior detective, who was serving on the force at the time, recalls: "This was a perfect example of a storm in a teacup. You had a very dangerous and Machiavellian informant who had been allowed to gain a position of influence and power because he was good at what he did. But he was a double-dyed manipulator. "Then we had some very ill-advised junior detectives who had allowed themselves to be convinced that there was some sort of conspiracy. But they failed to follow the evidence.

    "Whether there was any conspiracy, I can't answer. What I can answer is that there was no evidence of it." Two detectives, Det Chief Supt William Hiddleston and Det Sgt Peter Brown, eventually promised Donaldson immunity from prosecution as long as the documents were returned. Within weeks, the files had been dumped at the council tip off Dalkeith Road and police informed, but detectives naturally suspected the most sensitive documents had been copied.

    The deal did not prove popular with the high command, however, who were anxious to see an arrest to act as a deterrent. When he heard of it, Chief Constable Sir William Sutherland immediately vetoed the immunity arrangement. The force was under immense scrutiny. The internal report and its controversial initial conclusion was leaked to the Evening News, sparking a national sensation. The Crown Office appointed a highly-regarded QC, William Nimmo Smith, and a regional procurator fiscal, James Friel, to investigate.

    But the affair, dubbed "Fettesgate", was about to take another twist.

    Before the report was officially published, Nimmo Smith was duped into revealing his findings to a bogus journalist. The "journalist" was none other than Derek Donaldson, who immediately sold his "scoop" to a tabloid newspaper, indicating that the report had found no evidence of a homosexual conspiracy. Days later, Nimmo Smith was admitted to hospital with nervous exhaustion. Donaldson was later jailed for assaulting a real journalist who had continued to investigate the events. When Nimmo Smith's report was finally published in January 1993, it dismissed the idea of a "magic circle" of gay lawyers.

    The 101-page report concluded there was no evidence to support the idea of a conspiracy to undermine justice, but strongly criticised a number of police officers. Some had been "prepared to give as much credence to rumour as to actual evidence and to believe in conspiracy theories whether or not supported by evidence", it said. Other officers, it suggested, had been motivated by homophobia.

    William Hiddleston announced his retirement just hours after the chief constable had admitted a small group of detectives "may have let the side down". Several other officers connected were moved to uniformed duties.

    MP's enquiry that sparked dramatic chain of events

    FORMER long-serving Linlithgow MP Tam Dalyell played a crucial role in bringing the "magic circle" controversy into the public domain. The stolen police report which sparked the scandal was prepared in response to a letter the MP wrote to then Lothian and Borders Chief Constable Sir William Sutherland. Mr Dalyell had raised what he believed to be genuine public concern about a series of Crown Office decisions on cases investigated by the force.

    Sir William took these concerns very seriously and, after discussions with his deputy, Hector Clark, decided to have a secret report drawn up by a senior officer. Today, Mr Dalyell looks back on the furore as something which had positive effects on the force. Lothian and Borders Police established formal links with a series of gay community groups for the first time in its history in the wake of the controversy.

    Mr Dalyell said: "In the years following the so-called 'Fettesgate' scandal, Lothian and Borders Police did make an effort to learn some of the lessons from the inquiry. "It was a very awkward situation for some of the officers involved. I know that William Sutherland took it very seriously. "But, from that, the police did try and make things better."

    In recent years, the force has won widespread praise for its work building relations with the city's gay community. The rainbow flag of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community was flown above the Fettes HQ last year.

  • SOURCE
  • Homosexuality undermining justice in Scotland through the judiciary(From 1993)
  • MAGIC CIRCLE OF HOMOSEXUAL JUDGES AND LAWYERS
  • SCOTLAND 1