RICKY CANTY (WALES)

RICKY CANTY SAYS THUGS ENDED HIS ROOFTOP PROTEST

rooftop IF THESE TWO THUGS ARE NOT MASONS WE WILL BE SURPRISED, AS THIS IS THE TYPICAL TREATMENT OF HOW MASONS STEAL OUR LAND ,BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE UK.

TWO property developers bought a house at auction without knowing a protester had been camped on its roof for months, a jury heard yesterday.

And when Ricky Canty still refused to come down – they dragged him down leaving him injured, bleeding and trussed up with ropes and plastic cable ties, prosecutor David Elias alleged.

“He was in his shelter which was secured through the roof to the beams about 7pm on October 13 last year when he heard slates being removed from the inside and saw hands coming up through the roof,” Mr Elias told Cardiff Crown Court. “He was thrown through the hole which had been made from the inside and then attacked and trussed up with his wrists and ankles bound.”

Mr Canty had erected a tarpaulin tent on the Barry property he had lost to repossession in 2006. “The defendants had bought the house at Raldan Close, Barry, in 2007, no doubt with a view to doing it up and selling at a profit,” said Mr Elias. “They didn’t know there were difficulties and that Mr Canty had occupied the roof in protest.

“But by October 13, 2008, they had worked out exactly what they were going to do about that. Their plan was to get him down, tie him up and call the police saying they had been working on the inside of the house, when they heard a noise upstairs and found he had fallen through. They said they pulled him down, trying to help him but he went berserk – was like a banshee – and they had to restrain him.” Mr Elias said Mr Canty ““On the bedroom floor he was punched and kicked again. He thinks there were up to five people in the room – we say, including these two defendants, who had organised it all.” Those two defendants are George Beatty, 56, and Ernest Wray, 57, both from Fermanagh, Northern Ireland, who deny charges of false imprisonment and causing actual bodily harm.

Their account of the evening’s events was put to Mr Canty by barrister Jeremy Jenkins. Mr Jenkins alleged: “You fell down and were in such a rage you attacked them and they had to tie your hands to stop you hitting them.” Mr Canty, who still maintains he is the rightful owner of the property he moved into in 1995, told him: “You are wrong. Professional thugs were employed to get me down – they were paid to do a job and I know that for a fact.” The protester who climbed onto the roof on April 19, 2006, told the jury how he had bolted together “pieces of four-by-two” to create a wooden platform.

He made a tarpaulin shelter over it, secured by ropes to the beams in the roof space and, with the support of well-wishers, lived there maintaining his protest. He was under the shelter at around 7pm on October 13 last year when he said he heard the tiles being snapped from inside the attic and looked out to see two figures wearing bobble hats coming through. He said one climbed out, as he tried to stop the tiles being removed and suddenly he saw a third man who must have had a ladder up the property’s side, running towards him.

Mr Canty told the court: “He was running over it like a ballerina – that’s why I say they were professionals – and kicked me to the head as I was kneeling down. My life was saved by the message boards I had secured to the edge because I rolled into them.” He said the two men then threw him down through the hole they had made and he ended up on a bedroom floor where he was kicked and punched before his ankles and wrists were tied with rope and plastic cable ties. “At one point I thought they were going to electrocute me when I heard one say, ‘Get the generator, we’ll shock him’,” he said.

“I was left tied and bleeding from my nose, mouth and ears. Mr Wray and Mr Beatty were coming up now and again to check if I was still there – then I heard the police officers. “I was taken to hospital in a neck-brace and on a stretcher.”

  • SOURCE

  • ROOFTOP RICKY'S FAMILY PERSECUTED BY UK'S MASONIC MAFIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • RICKY DOWN OFF ROOF AND INTO A PRISON CELL 6 MARCH 2007

    RICKY Rooftop protester Ricky Canty today woke up in Cardiff prison after losing a 10-month battle to keep his home. Mr Canty, 57, was arrested inside the Royal Courts of Justice in London yesterday after his appeal against a six-month jail sentence for contempt of court was dismissed. The Barry man had first clambered on to the roof on April 19 last year to thwart bailiffs who had arrived to repossess the property.

    His case was heard close to the court where lawyers acting for Mohammed Al Fayed were applying for Prince Philip and Prince Charles to be called as witnesses in the inquest into the death of Princess Diana. With TV crews thick on the ground to cover that case, Mr Canty arrived at court for what turned out to be the final chapter in his long legal battle.

    Two police officers from Barry were waiting at the court to arrest him and bring him back to Cardiff as soon as his appeal was dismissed. Speaking on his mobile phone while being driven back to Cardiff in a police van, Mr Canty said: 'I don't care how long they jail me for, I'll be back on that roof as soon as I am released. I want justice. 'Obviously, they knew what the decision was going to be even before I arrived because there were two police officers from Barry waiting there to take me to prison.'

    Ricky came off the roof in the early hours of yesterday to take a train to London for the court hearing. Just hours later representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers, the trustees in bankruptcy in the Canty case, arrived to board up the property and remove Mr Canty's boards, tent and other belongings from the roof.

    His cousin, Tracy Sherlock, who with other neighbours and friends has provided him with food, hot water bottles and clothes, said: 'They said his stuff was rubbish. But I've got it all, including the suit he had to celebrate his 57th birthday on the roof, his Halloween suit and his Father Christmas suit. They can't find room for paedophiles in prison but they can find room for Ricky who is just standing up for his rights. It is disgusting. 'It's awful. I feel like he has died. His protest brought the community together. We've had children here today asking where he is and motorists are still tooting their horns to show they support him.' Neighbour Helen Dunn, who along with other neighbours prepared food for Mr Canty, said: 'I cannot believe they could put somebody like him in prison. I'll be making more signs for the house.'

    John Graham, of chartered surveyors Michael Graham Young, who have been appointed by Pricewaterhouse- Coopers, said there would now be an inventory of the contents of the property, which would then be valued before being placed in the hands of estate agents for sale

  • SOURCE

  • ROOFTOP PROTESTOR FACES JAIL TERM 5 MARCH 2007

    RICKY A rooftop protester has lost his appeal against a six-month jail sentence imposed for contempt of court. Ricky Canty staged a 10-month protest at his home in Barry, Vale of Glamorgan, after bailiffs and police came to take possession of the house.

    He appeared at London's Royal Courts of Justice on Monday where he lost his appeal against a jail term for contempt imposed last October. Police say a commital warrant was issued and a man, 57 is in custody.

    Canty was convicted of contempt after ignoring an order to leave the roof of his home in Raldan Close, in Barry. Throughout the protest, he communicated by mobile phone with provisions from supporters passed up to the roof using a bucket.

  • SOURCE

  • EURO COURT ACCEPTS ROOFTOP RICKY'S PAPERS

    RICKY ROOFTOP protester Rick Canty has received confirmation that the European Court has accepted his appeal papers. Mr Canty took to the roof of a house in Raldan Close, Barry on April 19 after bailiffs acting on behalf of the trustees in his bankruptcy arrived with a possession order for the property. “Since 1997 I have made five applications to the European Court in Strasbourg over my case,” said Mr Canty, on Monday (February 19). “Today I received confirmation that my latest application had been accepted. “In the past they have just chucked it in the bin. My guess is they just give people in London a ring, and decide not to deal with it.

    This time I hope it’s different.” Mr Canty, who has been on the roof for 311 days and nights, says he still intends to attend the Royal Courts of Justice in London on March 5. “I’m only getting off the roof to have my day in court,” said Mr Canty. “It is not that I’m desperate to get down, because I feel twice as strong as the day I first got up here. “If they nick me when I’m down, I’ll only come back again. As long as I’m alive I’ll keep coming back until the day I get justice.”

    Mr Canty says the bankruptcy order and possession order made against him were illegal, and says he is the legal owner of the property and the one owed money. Supporters who have supplied him with food and drinks are to accompany him up to London as a show of solidarity in his quest for justice.

  • SOURCE

  • RICKY'S OFF THE ROOF FOR A LAST BID AGAINST JAIL 5 MARCH 2007

    RICKY Rooftop protester Ricky Canty was today on solid ground for the first time in 10 months and facing going to prison. Mr Canty, 57, came off the roof of the house in Raldan Close, Barry, at 4am today. He has been demonstrating on the roof since April 19 when he clambered up there in defiance of bailiffs who had arrived to repossess the property.

    Mr Canty and his sister, Penny Richards, travelled to London today preparing for a crucial hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice. He has been fighting a bankruptcy order for several years. He was sentenced to a six-month prison sentence by the civil court in Cardiff last year for contempt of court. His case is that the bankruptcy order made against him was 'illegal' and the subsequent jail sentence was therefore based on a 'fraudulent' order. Today, at the Royal Courts of Justice, he was appealing against the bankruptcy order and the jail sentence. But Price Waterhouse Coopers, the trustees in bankruptcy in the case, have lodged an application with the court for an order preventing him making any more appeals. Mr Canty said: 'If that succeeds, my appeals won't be heard and I'll probably be sent to prison. I've brought along my toothbrush, my shaving gear and some tobacco.'

  • SOURCE

  • RICKY CANTY GAVE HIMSELF A LIFE SENTENCE AT THE COURT 3 DECEMBER 2001

    RICKY RICKY CANTY has become a familiar figure outside the County Court in Cardiff.

    For the past 17 months, the 52-year-old former car salesman has waged a one-man campaign against the justice system with a variety of tactics, including hanging a sheet of allegations on the court building and dressing up as a kangaroo. His protests concern a complicated land dispute in Barry dating back to 1978 and according to Ricky, the courts and various solicitors have been responsible for a catalogue of injustices. "I thought everyone else was the same as me. If you had a wrong done to you and you knew you were right, you would probably feel the same way. Eighty per cent of people who come out of that court complain about the way they have been treated," he says. "I know I am right."

    When asked why he is the one who pursues it, he says jokingly, "I'm half-Irish." But the humour belies a resilience to put a more half-hearted complainer to shame. But what motivates those who take such extreme action? Standing on Cardiff's Havelock Street, he is protesting to salve his own sense of anger as well as on behalf of his mother, Rita Grace, and late father, Daniel who died in 1982. In his usual uniform of navy wool over-coat, shirt and tie, smart trousers and black lace-up shoes, Ricky does not look out of place in the court's precincts. He appreciates the irony that passers-by, unaware he is responsible for the bed-sheet of accusations stretched across the building may think he is a solicitor or "one of them". "It's my fiancee, Coleen Jones, who told me to dress like this. I would have turned up in jeans but she told me I should look respectable."

    The routine is the same every weekday when he rises at 6.30am and drives to Cardiff, armed with his flask of tea, sandwiches and the cotton sheet of grievances. "I try to get there for 9.15am," he says, with the resolve of a dedicated employee. "Then I'll eat the sandwiches, anything from 11.30 to 1pm and spend the rest of the time chatting with my friend, Paddy, or talking to passers-by." He leaves the court by 3pm and returns to his Barry home, where he turns in at 11pm in preparation for a new day. "I try to put in six hours a day. I just try to show them up. I feel like a lion. I'll go on forever. I've spent all my family's money but I won't give up on this farce."

    His mother has visited a few times and his brother and sister are also supportive. Ricky says around a dozen people a day will ask about his grievances. He knows he has become a part of the landscape. In the 20-plus years he has pursued his case, Ricky has become well-versed in land law. At various hearings he has quoted from legal texts and says, with some relish that "the judge's head was on the table when I had finished talking to him". Ricky says he has written to local MPs, John Major, the Queen, the Queen Mother, Jack Straw, Mr and Mrs Kinnock, and every paper and television company in the UK. He also says that in 1997, he sent 1,000 directions to the European Court in Strasbourg in 1997 - "in red, green, yellow and blue for clarity". "You can't give up. Hope is better than hopelessness. I am thinking about it constantly but I have always been a good sleeper. My father used to call me the horizontal champion."

    He says MI5 robbed his house last year and took 10 years of tape recordings and registered letters to "professional important people". Despite being arrested and manhandled out of courts as well as a solicitor's office, he is adamant the routine will continue until he gets "justice" - costs from bringing all his cases, interest, and expenses. For passing office workers in Cardiff, Ricky has provided a familiar diversion. There was the occasion he dressed in a kangaroo outfit, hired from a fancy dress shop in Barry. "I had heard this phrase `kangaroo court' and thought that it applied in my case," he says. He stood sentry outside the court in full costume.

    He has also dressed in a judge's outfit, hired again, calling himself Mr Justice Denied, climbed on to the ledge of the court and was arrested. Ricky says that every member of staff has been told to use the court's other entrance and ignore him. He has been sent to jail on several occasions, including 28 days and 14 days for contempt of court. "I have thought about smashing the two big plants in the court foyer to try and draw attention to my case but that would be causing damage." For his next trick, Ricky plans to dress up as a ringmaster. Dr Allan Norris, a consultant clinical psychologist at Birmingham's Nuffield Hospital, says there are many reasons why an individual may deliberately make an exhibition of him or herself.

    "Motives range from a powerful sense of injustice to mental illness. In cases where there is not a medical condition, such a response could be because something matters dearly to them - such as the recent case of the animal rights activist who starved himself to death. "If people are not mentally ill, I suspect they become emotionally engaged and get very angry, hurt or anxious and it is then we stop thinking as logically as when we are calm and dispassionate. "You only have to look at two people arguing, when the row becomes heated, to see that they stop discussing rationally." Heightened emotions could be a likely in a "David and Goliath" situation. "One of the things that causes anger is frustration. If they feel frustrated by officialdom then I suppose it's quite likely their anger will increase. We have in this country an honourable tradition of protest and of people doing out of the ordinary things in order to draw attention to their cause which may mean they go to extremes." The Suffragettes were such a group. I don't want to judge people of another age by our standards today but at the time that was considered outrageous and anti-social but they were doing it to draw attention to their cause." catherine.jones@wme.co.uk

  • SOURCE