FEMINAZI

  • Female 'work' v REAL work (VIDEO)
  • Foster mother jailed for 14 years for torturing three children in her care set to be released from prison (Feminist Womens Aid won't be marching down the street protesting over this one)
  • High Court Judge: Don't always believe claims of domestic violence
  • The big list: Female teacher paedo's ,lesbians and predators caught having sex with students
  • Female Sexual Predators
  • Long Term Effects of Sexual Abuse by a Female
  • Female Pedophilia increasing?
  • Female Paedophiles
  • De-NWO Your Heart and Mind (from a female perspective)
  • Labour feminists like Harriet Hatemen protected homopaedo agenda
  • How three of the Labour party's most senior figures campaigned for a vile homopaedo group now being probed by police for 'abusing children on an industrial scale'
  • Labour's feminist / lawyer Harriet Hatemen and her homopaedo protecting network
  • The homopaedo warmongers pushing feminazi domestic abuse campaigns
    Despite massive exposures recently by the gutter press, that are only repeating what many victims on the internet have been exposing for decades, the scum and filth political establishment behind gross homopaedo abuse, murder and its cover up and who also support warmongering by the British and American neocons are determined to continue to ramp up the feminazi driven domestic violence mayhem.

    Despite the fact that young boys in care homes en masse have been removed from those homes and abused by the political establishment of Britain. Many of them in care homes after being removed from fathers under the guise of domestic violence allegations these evil bastards continue to pursue policies that have driven men to suicide and destroyed their lives while their children are abused and murdered by the very scum and filth manufacturing ever more draconian laws. Laws that smear heterosexual men in family courts that still to this day remain cloaked in secrecy and with little or no evidence offered by crooked lawyers on multi million pound legal aid budgets acting for ex wives ONLY interested in golddigging and little concerned with the consequences of children being removed from the physical protection of their biological father.

    Many men who are yet to face these horrific hearing are totally unaware, thanks to endless propaganda, that they are next for the chopping block that enriches the lawmakers with powers so vast they are getting away with murder using twisted allegations that financially enrich the freemason political and legal perverts as well as satisfying their insatiable appetite for youngsters stolen by the most sinister abuse of the law. Laws they make up as they go along.

    THERE IS METHOD IN THEIR MADNESS

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Extreme feminist agenda (on domestic violence ) moves into the workplace like a stasi state
  • Stasi domestic abuse cops take rare action against female OAP after she hit her husband with a magazine (This goes on against men all the time for the most trivial of events)
  • John Hemming MP: The more secret the court, the more the system acts against the rule of law (That rule of law is what crooked judges make up as they go along)(VIDEO)
  • High Court Judge: Don't always believe claims of domestic violence
  • Family courts hold the most drastic powers of any tribunal (and that's from a judge)
  • Homopaedo orgies in luxury flats and claims three boys were murdered by VIPs
  • MAGIC CIRCLE OF HOMOSEXUAL JUDGES AND LAWYERS
  • Second top British judge faces probe over 'defence' of paedo's
  • 1,000 children a week stolen by paedo leaning judges in Britain(VIDEO)
  • European parliament petition hears about 1,000 children a week stolen by Britain's judicial mafia
  • Homosexual top judge 'should be suspended over links to paedo's'
  • Second senior judge exposed as paedo apologist who wanted age of consent to be 14
  • Judges helped protect homopaedo MP Cyril Smith(VIDEO)
  • Homosexual top judge 'should be suspended over links to paedo's'
  • Struck off, judges caught pocketing £1.5million in legal aid handouts money still missing three years
  • Judge who gave BBC paedo Stuart Hall just 15 months quits after visiting gay brothel
  • Monster nannies Womens Aid ignore at their peril VIDEO
    Why I quit feminist society behind THOSE T-shirts
    feminist politicians

    Zionist Miliband, Feminist Harman and femiman Clegg

    Self-righteous. Narrow-minded. A mouthpiece for the unions... Blistering attack on The Fawcett Society by its former vice chair Joanne Cash

    Regretful: Joanne Cash says the Fawcett Society's furious reaction to MoS revelations reinforces her view that the feminist organisation has to change Despite a long history of fighting to improve the lot of women in British life, The Fawcett Society, Britain’s oldest feminist organisation, has never been ‘water cooler’ conversation. Until, that is, the events of the last two weeks, when T-shirts bearing the words ‘This is what a feminist looks like’ attracted exactly the wrong sort of attention.

    Faced with the facts – revealed by The Mail on Sunday– that the shirts had been cheaply produced by exploiting female workers in Mauritius, The Fawcett Society then damaged its reputation still further with a self-righteous yet evasive response, suggesting that the workers’ pay (62 pence an hour) was reasonable and that the T-shirts somehow remained ethical. When any organisation publicly abandons its core values, it is time for a rethink – the more so when, in the case of The Fawcett Society, it has been fatally undermined by an aggressive and immature culture of political point-scoring. I take a personal interest in The Fawcett Society and, as a former vice chair, I felt a lot of sympathy when the story first broke.

    Yet their persistent refusal to acknowledge the facts as they emerged has left me dismayed. The society takes its name from one of our greatest feminists, Millicent Fawcett – one of my heroes. Not only did she campaign tirelessly for the vote for women, she dedicated her life to increasing female access to education and justice and the abolition of sexual abuse. Sadly, by the time I was offered the role of vice chair in the spring of 2013, The Fawcett Society had already been displaced as the most significant feminist voice in the UK.

    New campaigns with fresh approaches were leading the way – campaigns for better representation on company boards, for example, or attempts to highlight the daily abuse of women. The tone and content feels different, modern.

    In comparison, The Fawcett Society appears narrow in its focus – and reliant on union funding. While the public is increasingly disenchanted by party politics, The Fawcett Society continues to be combative. Rather than appearing to speak for everywoman, it has become pigeon-holed as Left-wing, as a mouthpiece for the unions. The issues it stands for – equal pay, women in poverty – are as vital as ever, but Fawcett makes them sound tired. Yet, with such a strong and intellectual history, I believed that it could evolve.

    When I, as an active Conservative, was appointed to the board, it gave me confidence that change was possible. What I found instead was an office full of ideological but naive young women driving a Left-wing agenda, even while the charity was on its knees. It became apparent that some members of the staff had no idea how to run the charity, let alone grow it.

    Bright women with a good eye for statistics, I am unconvinced to this day that they have any vision for the future of the charity beyond more of the same narrow focus, the same reactive, outspoken press performances. When David Cameron reshuffled his Cabinet and increased the number of female full Cabinet Ministers from three to five, promoting a range of talented women to senior positions, I thought that surely The Fawcett Society would reach out across party lines and congratulate these women on their achievements. But no, they couldn’t resist the old game: ‘The substance didn’t live up to the hype’, they said. Cameron had ‘failed’ to meet his promise to make a third of his Cabinet women by the time of the Election.

    (A complete falsehood: One third of the Conservative members of the Coalition Cabinet were, in fact, women. But not even the Prime Minister can conjure up female Lib Dems.) So with huge regret, I decided that I could not continue as vice chair as I no longer believed that the change needed could take place within the existing culture. And I stepped down. I wasn’t at all surprised to see that Left-wing politicians were being used to promote the T-shirt, but I was dismayed.

    If your potential supporters hate mainstream politicians, why identify yourself with them? Why do you need Ed Miliband when you’ve got Benedict Cumberbatch? Using the T-shirt to raise money and profile was a terrific idea but yet again the point-scoring had derailed a smart source of funding. Fawcett’s response to this story has reinforced my view that it has still to change. In an indignant fury, the charity – along with high street retailer Whistles, with whom it has aligned itself – defended the abuse of some of the world’s most vulnerable women. This is still the stated position on the website at the time of writing.

    So where does the charity go from here? There is a place for a serious feminist voice in the UK. The Fawcett Society could be that voice if it returned to the values of its founder and learned how to build coalitions and consensus. It needs to be representative of all women. I have no doubt that Millicent Fawcett would be making the case for the protection of the girls of Rotherham. She would also by now have helped us re-engage with men. Some of her greatest feminist allies were men, including her husband Henry Fawcett and the philosopher John Stuart Mill. Many of the changes now needed to progress real equality for women require society to release men from stereotypes and conventions too. How can we share family obligations when men face stigma for taking time off work?

    That is just one example of the many changes we should fight for. There is more momentum behind the equality movement now than there has been for a long time. After the T-shirt story broke, someone on Fawcett’s staff wrote a sarcastic tweet in response to the T-shirt story: ‘We’ll just have to get along without the 11 million Mail readers. Aw, shucks.’ Possibly they can do that but equality cannot to be so narrowly selective. The Fawcett Society needs to decide what it is about.

    Flustered Harman in a sweat over 'slave labour'

    Harriet Harman last week continued to back the controversial Whistles feminist T-shirt, despite MoS revelations that it was produced by women in Mauritius paid just 62p an hour. The Labour deputy leader, who wore the T-shirt at Prime Minister’s Questions in the Commons, wrongly claimed that The Fawcett Society had conducted an ‘investigation’ into the T-shirts ‘after that accusation was made about slave labour’. In fact, The Fawcett Society has admitted it has yet to investigate the £45 T-shirts and the Mail on Sunday report mentioned nothing about ‘slave labour’, instead reporting a union leader’s view that the migrant workers’ low pay and cramped living conditions constituted a ‘sweatshop’. Whistles said they intend to send someone to Mauritius to investigate our report.

    Ms Harman seemed flustered on London’s LBC radio when presenter Iain Dale asked: ‘The people were paid 62p an hour – what would you call that, if it wasn’t slave labour?’ She replied: ‘Well, I, you know, I wasn’t involved in actually… I’m totally against slave labour… erm, but actually, if an organisation which is a charity promoting women’s rights give me a T-shirt to wear, I don’t, you know, look into all the background of how it was made, you know, I take it on trust.’ Ms Harman’s spokesperson declined to comment yesterday.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Female sex offenders: A growing threat?(or just covered up by feminist gutter press) VIDEO
    Feminist stoops to faking how men react to a drunk woman VIDEO
    When men are married to women who scream like you, they just want to die sooner! VIDEO


    Much more on female entitlement
    Why Feminism Needs to End: It's Time to Work Towards Equality
    against feminism Tackling feminism in today's world is -I'm told- rather a stupid idea. It's not that I'd be labelled a chauvinist pig and accused of wanting to keep women chained to chores and childcare, which I don't. It's not even that tackling a global movement as one person (which is how it feels, despite a mass of men and women attempting the same) is like standing against a tsunami wearing speedos and a snorkel; I'm aware that every word will be pulled apart, angered messages will fill my inbox and I'll be accused of ignorance and sexism.

    I've already, during initial research, acquired my first troll on my new Twitter account; I'm a "simple manbaby" apparently. The reason it's stupid for me to speak against feminism is simply because I have a penis...and the feminist does not accept a boy negatively commenting on the relevance or alleged prejudice of the feminist movement.

    I know this. Had I, as a male, pitched articles in support of feminism, perhaps I'd have been commissioned alongside the published pro-feminism male writers. But time and again, as I approached relevant sections of publications that boast a feminist voice, I was informed by the female, feminist editors that my views were 'not suitable'. I know that's like a satanist asking to put an advert for a willing, virginal sacrifice on the local church's noticeboard, but that's exactly the problem. If the media belongs to feminism like the noticeboard belongs to the church, where can you make another argument? I won't say who the guardian of feminism is, because I'd very much like to write articles for them and don't want to be blacklisted for publicly calling them sexist. But I feel I'm correct in seeing that bias.

    Also, polite conversation about feminism, with feminists, has invariably turned into my being ranted at. Apparently, the very fact I'm questioning feminism is because I'm a typical white male with all the privilege, no understanding of what it's like to be the victim in a sexist society and, therefore, have no right to question or challenge it. Even Emma Watson's speech at the UN saw feminists react in comment threads, saying that men should not have a say, despite her invitation.

    Yet, here I am; I have my speedos and my snorkel. First, I'm sorry feminism had to exist in the first place. I'm sorry about the past where women, as capable and wonderful as my own mother, my sister and as capable and strong as I know my daughters will be, were made to feel inferior, robbed of choices and treated as objects to be used and abused. I applaud the achievements of those who fought to bring about change and know there are still issues to resolve.

    But...yes, 'but'...this has gone far enough. The reason I stand here in my speedos is because there is a need. Women have faced and still face prejudice and inequality. Here's a fact, though: men do too. That men are not allowed to speak about the prejudice and inequality they face simply because they are men (and men, in generalised and historic terms, are not the victims of sexism) is just one ludicrous contradiction from feminists. That feminism apparently stands for 'equality' in order to be recognised as legitimate and politically correct, but does nothing to fight for the rights of separated fathers as equal parents, while advocating the social assumption that women are more emotionally bonded with their children based on gender stereotype, is just one transparent flaw, in the light of its own mission statement of equal rights.

    In one post, I cannot scratch the surface of all the issues: the false propaganda, the resulting angered cry of women, the politically correct expectation upon men to pay their penance for misogyny with unchallenged acceptance of feminist values in their homes, ironically leaving them silenced and without a vote. But follow me, converse with me and read my future posts.

    But here and now I'm not going to speak only on behalf of the men that I know are negatively affected by feminism. Indeed, the whole reason for my writing on the subject is because I actually care about gender equality, which is something I do not credit to feminism, or at least, what feminism has become. Women are feeling the sting too; women I care about. A recent study by Netmums found the majority of women felt feminism was too aggressive, de-valued the stay at home mum and applied too much pressure on women to do and be everything. 17% even stated it is oppressive to men.

    Women, actually, get a rough ride from feminism's soapbox rantings. There are standards to live up to, much like a Christian having to obey the 10 commandments or feel like a sinner. I have spoken to feminists and witnessed their despair as they defend their own life choices against what their feminist values dictate they should be or do. One, who prioritised her children over work, felt she let down her values as a feminist and felt pressured to work full-time. She spent ten minutes justifying her reasons for not doing so...not that I had challenged her. Another became exacerbated when stating she didn't "believe in high heels" because they symbolised the oppression of male objectification and her feminist values dictated she shouldn't wear them simply because a 'man' would like her to or because she should rely on a pair of high heels to make her attractive. She continued, taking both sides of conversation, making it clear she likes to wear them occasionally because it makes her feel good, for her, not for anyone else, it's not for a 'man', she has a right to wear them and shouldn't have to dress down simply to avoid being objectified...it went on. Bizarrely, all she was trying to do was feel justified in wearing something she liked and escape the judgement from feminists who would say she gave in by wearing them and the other feminists who would say she gave in by wearing flats. The 'man' was actually absent in this argument, apart from serving as the silent 'accused' and 'guilty'.

    Women: go out and work, put up your own shelves, make him look after the children, you don't have to cook. Be strong, be capable, make your own decisions and be autonomous. Feminism is dogmatic. It sets rules. Like a religion it praises particular behaviour, but there are too many denominations, with no central scripture. Under the umbrella label of feminism the message is mixed, destructive and confusing. The result is that wearing one flat shoe and one heel, feminism simply walks in circles.

    Feminism casts out the old gender roles of both men and women as outdated and primitive, promoting the working, confident, strong woman as 'progressive' and the stay at home mother and wife as a woman who is 'socialised' into an inferior lifestyle of old. Women are free, only, to choose feminism's idea of the 'equal woman' in this new world; it has sculpted its own idea of the perfect gender roles and is socialising both sexes into playing these 'acceptable' roles in society. The odd result is that women have more choice, but only feel allowed to choose that which is deemed acceptable, according to the stereotype of the all new and improved modern woman. Going back to the current plight of the male, it's easy to see that feminism pushes women toward choosing and living a particular role in society, whether they like it or not. Women are to choose to work, choose a reversed gender role in parenting. Choose, choose, choose. After all those years of oppression, women have the right to choose and should do so!

    Two questions:

    If the woman in a relationship has the power of choice awarded to her by feminism, what power does the man, her partner, have?

    Is this equality?

    Simply acknowledging that if women have the authority to choose, then men don't, is a step forward because it becomes glaringly obvious that the feminist agenda will not bring about equality. Men are now having to fight for their own power, even to speak. There are issues of inequality on either side and they will not be resolved if men are fighting for men and women are fighting for women. A tug of war is not over until one team has fallen into the muddy ditch in the middle. That's not equality. HeForShe? That's about men fighting for women on the assumption -and outdated notion- that women are the only ones suffering gender inequality, which isn't even a stab in the right direction. Perhaps we all need to grow up and realise that within our society, we can collectively, as united men and women, set a standard that is fair for all. I know feminism doesn't speak for all women. I know feminism actually makes it difficult for many women. I know feminism does not allow men to voice their opinions.

    So, to the women and men in our society who actually want equality, I would like to extend your formal invitation. Gender equality, prejudice and crime against anyone of any gender, is your issue too. We need to end the tug of war, put down the rope and come to the table as equals and tackle prejudice and crime together. That is the campaign where men and women stand side by side and decide what type of society we can make, acknowledging each other's flaws, faults, strengths and where we each feel we suffer prejudice from the other. Such a campaign does not begin with one side 'allowing' the other to join. Neither does its name imply one side should fight only for the rights of the other. "HeForShe"? I'd call it "AllForEquality".

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Women smash up McDonalds when breakfast menu expires VIDEO
    Salma Hayek pushes the feminist agenda in Hollywood (superiority NOT equality)
    salma hayek

    Feminism removes any air of sexiness when they start the ranting
  • Hollywood run by zionists and feminists
  • Feminist mouthpiece Annie Lennox on the feminazi tshirt produced in a sweat shop VIDEO


    Feminist Lennox spouts bullshit trying to justify how the feminazi she rants on endlessly about can use foreign females in sweat shop conditions then sell their tacky tshirts for extortionate sums

  • Feminist mafia like MP Harriet Hatemen and Fawcet society use females on 62p
    per hour to manufacture their twisted tshirts
  • This is what a CHUMP looks like: Miliband under fire for wearing £45 'feminist'
    T-shirt that is made in a 62p-an-hour sweatshop
  • The political bastards that bow to the very warped feminist agenda
    feminist politicians

    Zionist Miliband, Feminist Harman and femiman Clegg

    So much for their man hating ranting about EQUALITY when they don't mind women in foreign factories pumping out their vile t shirts.

    62p AN HOUR: What women sleeping 16 to a room get paid to make Ed and Harriet's £45 'This Is What A Feminist Looks Like' T-shirts

    Feminist T-shirts proudly worn by Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg and Harriet Harman are made in ‘sweatshop’ conditions by migrant women paid just 62p an hour, an investigation has revealed. The women machinists on the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius sleep 16 to a room – and earn much less than the average wage on the island. The £45 T-shirts carry the defiant slogan ‘This is what a feminist looks like’. But one of the thousands of machinists declared: ‘We do not see ourselves as feminists. We see ourselves as trapped.’

    They are the T-shirts designed to make a political statement about women’s rights – but the female workers making them are paid just 62p an hour in an Indian Ocean ‘sweatshop’. Between shifts women making garments emblazoned with the slogan ‘This is what a feminist looks like’ sleep in spartan dormitories, 16 to a room. And critics say the low wages and long hours at the Mauritian factories amount to exploitation.

    The shirts have been worn by Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg and Harriet Harman, all keen to display their feminist credentials – even though the Deputy Prime Minister last night admitted he had ‘no idea’ where the garments were made. But MOS has toured a factory producing the T-shirts, where workers earn just 6,000 rupees a month – equivalent to £120. The figure is just a quarter of the country’s average monthly wage, and around half of what a waiter earns. Each ‘feminist’ T-shirt costs just £9 to make, but high street chain Whistles sells them for £45 each – a figure it would take the women a week and a half to earn.

    The retailer promised an urgent investigation last night in the wake of the Mail on Sunday exposé. At one factory visited by The Mail on Sunday, a female worker told us: ‘How can this T-shirt be a symbol of feminism when we do not see ourselves as feminists? We see ourselves as trapped.’ An official from factory owner Compagnie Mauricienne de Textile (CMT) told us he ‘would not be happy’ if the women left the work camp during the week in case they turned up for work ‘hungover’.

    Whistles, whose customers include the Duchess of Cambridge, is selling the T-shirts in aid of women’s activism group The Fawcett Society – which receives all profits. The campaign is backed by fashion magazine Elle.

    Deputy Labour Leader Harriet Harman wore a shirt carrying the slogan on the front bench of the Commons during Prime Minister’s Questions last week, while the Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders proudly posed for photographs in Elle’s ‘feminism issue’ in the T-shirts. Fayzal Ally Beegun, president of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Union said: ‘The workers in this factory are treated very poorly and the fact that politicians in England are making a statement using these sweatshop T-shirts is appalling. ‘It would take a woman working in the factory nearly two weeks just to buy one shirt. What is feminist about that? These women have nothing in this world. They are paid a pittance and any money they do receive they send back home.

    ‘They work very long hours and have no lives other than their work. They are on four-year contracts that mean they don’t get to see their families in that time. What kind of existence is it when you are sharing your bedroom with 15 other women? ‘The women have no careers or even the most basic of opportunities. This is not what feminism is supposed to be.’ Celebrities pictured wearing the feminist T-shirt in Elle magazine include Benedict Cumberbatch, Tinie Tempah, Eddie Izzard, Richard E Grant and Simon Pegg.

    Yesterday a reporter and a photographer from The Mail on Sunday were given a guided tour of CMT’s factory in La Tour Koenig, north Mauritius. As managing director Francois Woo showed us around the sleeping quarters he said: ‘All of our dormitories are identical. There are 16 beds in each room. They are based on university dormitories in China. They don’t need a lot of room because they only use them for sleep.’ He told us that the plant is one of six across the island where living conditions and wages are identical. He could not say at which factory the Whistles T-shirts were made, but confirmed they made 300 at a cost of £9. ‘The machinists at our factories made the feminist T-shirt for Whistles’ he said, adding: ‘All the machinists earn 6,000 rupees.’ Mr Woo instructed workers to smile as our photographer took pictures of them on the shop floor.

    The tour was delayed when we asked to view the women’s accommodation block. Staff made several phone calls and 30 minutes later we were allowed to view the bedrooms. The 20ft square rooms are home to eight sets of bunk beds, each with a thin mattress and a pillow. Shelving on the far wall houses the workers’ meagre belongings. The women – who we could not talk to – work 45 hours a week basic and can earn more if they work overtime.

    After the tour and without the company’s senior staff, we visited another of the company’s factories, in Curepipe. Outside we spoke to one 30-year-old worker. She told us: ‘I have worked here for four years and I have not been able to see my son or husband in Bangladesh during all that time. We work very hard, sometimes 12 hour days, for not much money. I send all my money home and could not afford to fly back and see my family.

    I've not been able to see my son or husband in Bangladesh for four years
    30-year-old migrant worker


    ‘It is awful but we have no choice. In my country, the rupees I earn here are worth three times as much as they are in Mauritius. ‘How can this T-shirt be a symbol of feminism?

    ‘These politicians say that they support equality for all, but we are not equal.’ CMT has an annual turnover of £125 million. It produces 40 million T-shirts a year for clients including Topshop, Next and Urban Outfitters. It employs 13,000 staff at its factories and about 4,500, all foreign, are housed on site. Migrants come from countries including Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India and Vietnam.

    There are around 2,800 female machinists. Workers are expected to produce around 50 shirts a day and face discipline if they do not reach their target. Mr Woo said: ‘The Mauritian government has set out a minimum wage that we must pay and we abide by their rules.

    ‘I am like a parent to the workers. They are free to come and go as they please but if they go out on a weeknight I will not be happy because then they will turn up for work the next day hungover. If people didn’t want to work for us then they don’t have to, nobody is forcing them. If they have the chance to earn more somewhere else then they should go elsewhere. ‘If they didn’t like it, then we would not have existed as a company for 28 years.’

    The factory was the focus of an exposé in 2007 when it was revealed that workers were being paid just £4 a day to make clothes for Sir Philip Green’s Kate Moss range at Topshop. At the time, the factory employed agents who promised migrant workers good wages but when they moved to Mauritius they were told they would earn a pittance. The factory was also criticised for paying workers of different nationalities different wages. Mr Woo added: ‘A lot has changed since then. The workers know exactly how much they will make when they start working here and people are paid the same, regardless of their race or sex.’ Last night Dr Eva Neitzert, deputy chief executive at the Fawcett Society said: ‘As a charity that campaigns on women’s rights in the labour market, we take ethical standards very seriously. We have been assured by Whistles that the “This is what a feminist T-shirt looks like” range has been produced to ethical standards.’

    Dr Neitzert said they had originally been assured the garments would be produced ethically in the UK, and when they received samples in early October they noted they had in fact been made in Mauritius. They were assured by Whistles that the factory was 'a fully audited, socially and ethical compliant factory' and decided to continue with the collaboration. 'We have been very disappointed to hear the allegations that conditions in the Mauritius factory may not adhere to the ethical standards that we, as the Fawcett Society, would require of any product that bears our name,' she said.

    'At this stage, we require evidence to back up the claims being made by a journalist at the Mail on Sunday. However, as a charity that campaigns on issues of women’s economic equality, we take these allegations extremely seriously and will do our utmost to investigate them. 'If any concrete and verifiable evidence of mistreatment of the garment producers emerges, we will require Whistles to withdraw the range with immediate effect and donate part of the profits to an ethical trading campaigning body. 'Whilst we wish to apologise to all those concerned who may have experienced adverse conditions, we remain confident that we took every practicable and reasonable step to ensure that the range would be ethically produced and await a fuller understanding of the circumstances under which the garments were produced.' Whistles refused to say how many of the T-shirts had been made, or indeed where

    The chain initially said they did not feel they had been given adequate time to respond to our questions about the T-shirts. But a spokesman later promised: ‘We place a high priority on environmental, social and ethical issues. The allegations regarding the production of T-shirts in the CMT factory in Mauritius are extremely serious and we are investigating them as a matter of urgency. ‘CMT has Oekotex accreditation, [an independent certificate for the supply chain] which fully conforms to the highest standards in quality and environmental policy, while having world-class policies for sustainable development, social, ethical and environmental compliance.

    ‘We carry out regular audits of our suppliers in line with our high corporate social responsibility standards and can share the following information regarding the CMT factory in Mauritius.’ However the company acknowledged: ‘We will require time to thoroughly investigate the allegations with the factory and our lawyers in great detail. CMT is one of the largest suppliers to many high street brands, including the Arcadia group [owner of Topshop and Burton]. When she founded Whistles, former Topshop executive Jane Shepherdson vowed: ‘Customers cannot keep buying cheap clothes and not ask where they come from’ – as ‘someone somewhere down the line is paying’.

    Last night, a spokesman for Nick Clegg said the Deputy Prime Minister had not known where the shirts were made. He said: ‘Nick Clegg had no idea where these T-shirts were being made and can only assume that the Fawcett Society were unaware of the origins, or they would not have asked him to wear it. He remains entirely supportive of efforts to ensure all women are treated as equals in this country and the world over.’ A spokesman for Labour Leader Ed Miliband and Deputy Leader Harriet Harman would only say: ‘This was a campaign run by Elle and the Fawcett Society to promote feminism and we were happy to support it.’

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Female 'work' v REAL work VIDEO
    Feminist claims ALL the compliments she got on New York streets were harassment VIDEO


    How many men would love that sort of attention????????
    Feminists take over 5,000 parking spots in South Korea VIDEO
    Feminism spelt out what they WANT but NOTHING about GIVING VIDEO
    'If she was a man she'd be jailed': Mother's fury after friend who had sex with her 14 yr old son walks free
    karen ackland A mother whose friend had sex with her 14-year-old son at a family party has slammed a judge for letting her walk free from court.

    The mother, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was sickened to discover Karen Ackland, 44, had taken advantage of her son - who is 30 years her junior. Divorced mother-of-two Ackland was at a party when she met the schoolboy. After hours of drinking the boy's mother offered Ackland a bed at their home.

    Ackland, the mother of two teenagers, pounced on the boy as he got ready for bed and used him as her 'sex object' - until the boy's older brother heard noises and caught her in the act. She was handed a nine-month jail term, suspended for a year, after admitting three charges of sexual activity with a child. Unleashing a scathing attack on the sentence, the child's mother said: 'If she had been a man I think she would have had a jail sentence. 'When my son was interviewed I was welling up. He looked exhausted, he was emotionally drained. 'It was absolutely harrowing to hear.

    'Women should have as long sentences as men. It's exactly the same sexual act.' The peroxide-blonde was also heard to say 'I can't believe I'm doing this with a 15 year old!' Canterbury Crown Court heard the boy, who is now 16, was just 14 years old at the time. Ackland, of Kent, quickly changed her plea to guilty just before the victim was due to give evidence. Judge Simon James said Ackland had 'immediately regretted' her behaviour and although committed in drink he said 'that does not afford you any real excuses'.

    He added that the law was to protect teenagers from doing things which they may later regret. The youngster's distraught mother yesterday called for harsher sentences for female sex offenders. She said: 'I never expected her to do this, you trust your friends. And he was just a child.

    'She was always a party animal and when she had too many drinks she completely loses all self-respect and embarrasses herself. 'She used to always say 'I'm a nightmare when I've had a drink' and she'd always have a few men on the go. 'But I was a great friend to her and I stood by her. I never expected this. 'She was very domineering and my son said as soon as it happened that he'd wished he'd never done it.'

    Ackland first set eyes on her young victim at the event on April 27 last year. The group first went back to Ackland's house where Andrew Espley, prosecuting, said 'everyone did three shots of Vodka'. Ackland then backed the helpless boy into a corner in the kitchen and they kissed.

    She tried to get the boy to walk her home on the pretext she had lost her phone, but his older brother refused to let him go. But as the boy went upstairs to get some tracksuit bottoms so he could changed for bed, Ackland sneaked into the room behind him. Mr Espley said: 'During this she was moaning and at one point asked him to spit into her mouth. 'What she did caused them to be discovered.

    'She was drunk at the time and used the teenager as a sexual object.' After the boy's brother burst into the room, Ackland ran out the family's home and kept what she had done from the his mother. The boy later told a friend: 'I went to get into my trackies and she stripped naked in front of me. 'Yeah we had sex but it was really weird.'

    Mr Espley said within days the incident was the talk of the school and teachers were forced to report the incident to police. Ackland told a friend: 'He tried to kiss me. I'm a 40-year-old woman what am I supposed to do?' Domini Webber, defending, said the Tesco shelf-stacker grew up in Germany as the daughter of a father who was in the military. She married in 1993 but is now divorced with two teenage children.

    Mr Webber said: 'She accepts that this was extremely irresponsible behaviour and she admits to being a binge drinker.' Ackland was also ordered to sign the Sex Offenders' Register and pay £500 court costs. Director of children's charity Kidscape Claude Knights yesterday said the sentence 'sends out a very weak message'.

    She said: 'The suspended nine-month custodial sentence does not reflect the severity of this crime and sends out a very weak message. 'Despite many advances in our understanding the true extent of female sexual abuse remains a hidden picture. One has to ask how this crime would have been perceived had it been committed by a man. 'The response to such despicable crimes against children should be very robust regardless of the gender of the perpetrator.'

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Meet the 'Women Against Feminism' VIDEO


    Young women around the world have been posting selfies in protest against feminist ideas. The movement started on Tumblr, before moving to Twitter and Facebook. There's been a strong reaction from feminists, who say their ideas have been misunderstood.
    Brave women who are standing up against the feminazi





    CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

  • Meet The Women Of “Women Against Feminism” Through Their Selfies
  • Thousands of mothers have multiple babies removed
    forced adoption There are multiple issues that need addressed here. Why if so many women are unfit to care for their children are they being given custody in divorce actions? Is the reason the judicial mafia want to separate fathers from their children and left with a mother who maybe is unfit an EXCUSE to steal children into care? What life will those children have that end up in the care system that seems to be run by homopaedo gangs or even adopted by homosexuals for their own sexual deviancy? Men who have gone through the family courts are well aware the lengths crooked judges, lawyers and bailiffs aided by freemason cops, will go to steal children and the estates of men caught up in this enormous racket. Is the ultimate goal to feed the paedo rings that the system requires to have the crooks blackmailable?

    Thousands of mothers over the past seven years have had successive children removed by family courts in England, the BBC has learned.

    Court records for that period show 7,143 mothers were involved in repeat care cases - affecting 22,790 children. Researchers found children were taken away from their parents by local authorities in more than 90% of cases. The research was carried out by the Universities of Brunel and Manchester and funded by the Nuffield Foundation. This is the first time such data has been produced.

    It backs up what judges have observed in their own courts for many years - that many mothers are stuck in a destructive cycle of pregnancies and care proceedings. The courts remove a young child or baby from a mother, owing to abuse or neglect, only to see the same mother return to court a year or two later, with a new baby, and unable to care for that one either. Most misuse drink or drugs - or both. Nicholas Crichton recently retired after many years as a judge in the family court.

    He said: "The work of the family courts for years has been removing the second, the third, the fourth child from the same mother. Not infrequently the sixth, the seventh, the eight. "In one case I've removed the 14th and I know two judges that have removed the 15th child from the same mother." According to the research, half the women involved are 24 or below at the time of the first care application, with the youngest being 14. Their babies are often removed quickly, at birth or soon afterwards.

    Dr Karen Broadhurst of the University of Manchester, lead author of the research, told the BBC that "in approximately 42% of cases, infants were subject to care proceedings within a month of their birth, which is an important finding". "We know that in 70% of cases infants were subject to proceedings within the first year of their life, which obviously leaves the mother with very little time to turn her life around." She also said the gaps between care proceedings were short for these mothers.

    "We think there is an average of 17 months between the first time a mum appears in court with an infant and the second time she appears in court with another infant. "It suggests to us there's a very short interval between pregnancies, which gives mums very little time to engage in their own rehab."

    Pioneering approach

    Dr Broadhurst argued that the research demonstrates the need for family courts to change their approach, to help these women change their behaviour. "We also need to get better at ensuring those young parents can access the treatment that's recommended within the family court." One pioneering new approach is that of the Strengthening Families Project, funded by Salford Council.

    A community midwife, Wendy Warrington, and a specialist social worker, Elly Siddall, run workshops for pregnant women who risk losing their new baby, because they or their partner have already had at least one child taken into care. Their approach is direct and hard-hitting. One Thursday afternoon, in a health centre in Eccles, Ms Warrington told a group of mothers-to-be about the side effects of drinking during pregnancy. "They're born early, there's an increased risk of stillbirth," she said, pulling up graphic images on her whiteboard. "There's definitely abnormal brain development. Risk of loss of limbs, fingers, toes."

    The women were visibly shocked. More disturbing images followed, of babies damaged by drug-taking mothers. One woman broke down in tears, worried she had already hurt her child through drinking. The project has been running for two-and-a-half years and early results are promising. More mothers are succeeding in keeping their babies at home. For Salford Council, that is money saved - foster care is expensive. For the mothers who keep their babies, it is a new chance. One young woman, in her early 20s, whose two eldest children had been adopted as babies, said: "It was just a mess. I had two children taken into care, though not of my own fault, through my past partner, my oldest little girl's dad. He battered her when she was three-and-a-half months old."

    She became pregnant again - and the new baby was taken away from the hospital very soon after birth by Salford Children's Services. She was devastated, suffered from postnatal depression, and missed her two babies. Like many women in this situation, she wanted to have another child as soon as possible. For her third pregnancy, however, she came to the Strengthening Families project.

    She found it supportive and honest, saying: "They will tell you straight and that is what people need." Ms Warrington and Ms Siddall also provide informal support to the mothers in the project, regularly calling them, sometimes visiting at home, to make sure they're looking after themselves and their unborn child. The team help write reports for the Family Court.

    'Immense' cost

    This project has been going for two-and-a-half years, whereas the pioneering Family Drug and Alcohol Court (FDAC) set up by Mr Crichton in central London has been running since 2008. Last month the Nuffield Foundation found FDAC had helped 35% of mothers become reunited with their children, compared with 19% in the ordinary family courts. The FDAC has its own team of experts, doctors, therapists and expert social workers from the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust and the children's charity Coram.

    Most parents in care cases have problems with drugs or alcohol. The FDAC's team helps them kick their addictions and, like the Strengthening Families Project, teaches them how to be better parents. It is funded by London local authorities who, like Salford, recognised the benefits to their budgets of keeping children out of care, even though the cost of this court is higher than that of the ordinary family court. One other FDAC has been opened in Gloucester, another is planned, but so far expansion has been slow.

    This spring the president of the family court, Sir James Munby, praised the court and said: "FDAC is - it must be - a vital component in the new family court." He has said there should be an FDAC in every family court in England. Nicholas Crichton believes the new research underlines the need for the expansion of projects which help parents break the destructive cycle. "The emotional cost to those families, and to their children, is immense but the financial cost to the taxpayer is immense as well and we really have to find a different way of dealing with these cases."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Another witch bitch thieving from the elderly VIDEO
    Plain women get airbrushed to perfection VIDEO

    What you see is NOT what you get
    The weaker sex VIDEO
    The tricks dangerous women use on unwary guys VIDEO
    Personality disorders of a dangerous woman VIDEO
    How to Spot a Dangerous Woman VIDEO
    Britain's most notorious nagging wife breaches noise nuisance ASBO over husband's Lottery ticket blunder
    juliengriffiths and there are thousands more like her that are invisible to Womens Aid

    BRITAIN'S most notorious nagging wife has got herself in trouble again by shouting at her hubby for buying the wrong lottery ticket.

    Julie Griffiths – who was handed a five-year Anti-Social Behaviour Order in December 2012 for being a noise nuisance to her neighbours – this time let rip at henpecked husband Norman over a bowl of cornflakes. And on Monday she was hauled before magistrates again for breaching the ASBO for a second time. North Staffordshire Justice Centre heard how Griffiths, 43 – who shouts, swears and berates factory worker Norman, 65, on a daily basis – sent him to the newsagents to buy a lottery scratchcard on March 9.

    But when her husband of 25 years returned she launched into a blistering rage because he had bought the wrong one. Prosecutor Steve Knowles said nearby residents in Talke, Staffordshire, became concerned when they heard night-shift worker Griffiths shouting. He said: “Neighbours confirmed that they heard Julie Griffiths screaming, shouting and swearing, and later banging on the walls at her home.

    "They say it went on for about 45 minutes.

    "One neighbour used his mobile phone to record the noise and her voice was getting louder and louder. “Griffiths was interviewed by police and confirmed she had had an argument with her husband.” The ASBO prohibits her from creating noise audible to neighbouring properties – shouting, screaming or banging on internal doors.

    But she breached the order just four months after it was first imposed when arguing with Norman last April. And on Monday she admitted breaching the order a second time. Alan Dawson, defending, said: “She has an ASBO but during this day in particular, there is an argument at the address and it’s as simple as that. “This is a lady who wants to get on with her life and keep herself to herself, but there is going to be some escape of noise in relation to her neighbours.”

    Griffiths had been warned after her first breach that she could face jail but magistrates decided to fine her £165. She was also ordered to pay £105 court costs and must attend anger management classes.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Feminists claim they make the best spies VIDEO
    Feminazi v Cops: Violent clashes erupt at International Women's Day march in Turkey VIDEO
    Feminist claims Arab men hate women? VIDEO
    Labour feminists like Harriet Hatemen protected homopaedo agenda
    We have known for a very long time lawyer / politician / feminist Harriet Hateman was evil with her constant smear campaigns aimed at heterosexual men meanwhile she was happy to support the homosexuals and homopaedo's pushing a vile agenda. Labour can NEVER be trusted while bastards like Harman are within their ranks.

    Now say sorry! Ex-Yard chief calls on Labour trio to admit backing paedophilia was a 'huge mistake'

  • Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey, and Patricia Hewitt all held key roles in the National Council for Civil Liberties
  • The left-wing human rights organisation built extraordinary links with the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange
  • The trio refuse to comment on the NCCL’s activities or apologise for them
  • Mike Hames, former head of Scotland Yard’s Paedophile Squad, said they made a huge mistake


  • Three senior Labour figures were under mounting pressure last night to apologise for supporting a vile group campaigning to legalise child sex.

    Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman, her husband, home affairs spokesman Jack Dromey, and former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt all held key roles in the National Council for Civil Liberties. The left-wing human rights organisation built extraordinary links with the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange during the 1970s and 80s, yet the trio refuse to comment on the NCCL’s activities or apologise for them. But Mike Hames, the former head of Scotland Yard’s Paedophile Squad, said: ‘They made a huge mistake. At the very least they should acknowledge, publicly, that they got it wrong. ‘That would be a great help to victims of child sex abuse.’






    CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE


    A Mail investigation yesterday revealed the shocking links between the Labour figures and PIE, a group of predatory paedophiles calling for the age of consent to be cut to just four. Former detective superintendent Mr Hames said: ‘Through their political correctness, the NCCL legitimised the Paedophile Information Exchange and its vile members. ‘Senior figures at the NCCL equated PIE with the campaign for homosexual equality. They were anxious not to criticise people with unusual sexual interests. PIE had tried to intellectualise the issue of child sex but they were just apologists for paedophilia, and the NCCL was misguided in its support.’

    Police are investigating the paedophile group as part of Operation Fernbridge, launched in the wake of the Jimmy Savile affair, with one source saying there is evidence that PIE members were abusing children ‘on an industrial scale’. The Home Office is also carrying out a ‘thorough, independent investigation’ into shocking claims that the Labour government of the Seventies may have helped finance the group. The reviled PIE, formed in the early 1970s, openly campaigned to legalise child sex.

    Members did not present themselves as child abusers but ‘child lovers’, keen to ‘liberate’ children from sexual ‘repression’. Tom O’Carroll, once described as ‘one of the most infamous perverts on earth,’ was co-founder and PIE chairman. Key roles: Harriet Harman and husband Jack Dromey. They were leading officials in the NCCL, which was linked to predatory pedophile group PIE Yet despite the group’s notoriety, the NCCL granted ‘affiliate’ status to the group.

    The Mail investigation discovered that during the 1970s and 80s, Miss Hewitt described PIE in glowing terms as ‘a campaigning/counselling group for adults attracted to children’. The NCCL lobbied Parliament for the age of sexual consent to be cut to ten – if the child consented and ‘understood the nature of the act’. It also called for incest to be legalised in what one MP dubbed a ‘Lolita’s charter’.

    The NCCL – now the respected pressure group Liberty – filed a submission to Parliament claiming that ‘childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult, result in no identifiable damage’. The Labour trio were all senior figures in the NCCL – then a small, tight-knit group of activists. Miss Hewitt was general secretary of the NCCL from 1974-83, Miss Harman was a newly qualified solicitor when she became its legal officer in 1978 until 1982, when she entered Parliament. Mr Dromey sat on the NCCL executive committee from 1970-79.

    The Mail repeatedly sent detailed questions to the trio about their links to PIE and whether they regret supporting such a vile group. Neither Miss Hewitt nor Mr Dromey replied. A spokesman for Miss Harman said: ‘This story is untrue and ridiculous.’

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • How three of the Labour party's most senior figures campaigned for a vile paedo group now being probed by police for 'abusing children on an industrial scale'
  • Labour's feminist / lawyer Harriet Hatemen and her paedo protecting network
  • Why I don't Hate Men
    man hater My brother once asked grandfather why he had fought for Stalin. "Oh no" he replied. "We didn't fight for Stalin. We fought for the women and children of Russia."

    Society is in the clutch of a satanic cult, the Illuminati, that seeks to erase gender and portray heterosexuality as pathological.

    A young Russian woman, who lives in Dublin and blogs at anti misandry.com describes how she formed healthy and positive feelings toward men.

    "Women have very little idea of how much men hate them" - Germaine Greer by Lanovar 22

    Germaine Greer Vs My Russian Grandfather. - No Contest (henrymakow.com)

    One of my most vivid childhood memories is a near tragedy on a frozen lake ...in my home town near the outskirts of Rostov on Don. ...I was walking home from school with my grandfather ...we could see skaters on the frozen lake a few hundred yards from the street. As we turned off the main street there was no sound except the crunching of our boots in the snow. A scream broke the silence and we instinctively looked towards the lake. Two skaters, a mother and her daughter, had fallen through the ice. Grandfather began running towards the lake. It amazed me how fast he could move considering he had lost a foot in the war. I followed Grandfather as quickly as I could, but we were beaten to the lake shore by a group of young soldiers who were already crawling on their bellies across the ice, in single file towards the two women flailing around in the freezing water.

    The soldiers were joined by some other men who had rushed out of one of the cafes. They brought some ladders to lay out on the ice to spread the weight of the rescuers. The women were pulled to safety and dragged bodily to the shore, passed from one man to the next until they were safely on the bank. The women, a mother and daughter were wrapped in blankets, fed hot soup and bundled into a truck to take them to hospital just in case.

    The crowd dispersed. The soldiers and the other men drifted back into the cafes to resume their meals and a short while later, grandfather and I were sitting with my parents, toasting ourselves in front of the big stove. Grandfather began telling stories of the war; tales of stoic endurance, boundless determination and heroic deeds. He always admonished me to remember that the bounties of my comfortable childhood had been paid for by all those men who had never returned home. My brother had once asked him why he had fought for Stalin. "Oh no" my Grandfather replied. "We didn't fight for Stalin. We fought for the women and children of Russia."

    Grandfather left early that night and trudged back through the town, braving one of the famous white storms, to reach the hospital where his wife, my grandmother, was recuperating from a painful operation on her eyes. He would sit and read to her through the night as she drifted in and out of sleep, until finally he would be driven from the clinic by a stern nurse telling him to go and get some rest.

    MALE ACTS OF BRAVERY

    I have seen many acts of incredible bravery on the news. Men who didn't hesitate to drag people from the wreckage during the awful metro bombings in Moscow; men who stormed an aircraft in Perm when hijackers threatened to shoot hostages; men who threw themselves into the icy waters of the Volga to rescue people from a sinking ferry. Whenever there is an earthquake, an avalanche, a tsunami or a hurricane, it is the men of any nation who will instinctively rush to help. It is the men who will put their own lives on the line if they have to, to save others. When the crisis is over, it is the men who will clear roads, repair bridges, restore power lines and begin to re-build. I often wonder if Germaine Greer has ever done anything even remotely as valuable as the men she has spent her life ridiculing.

    But there are also the ordinary heroes. Billions of men who work hard and often do dangerous jobs in order to support women and children, and in order to keep women and children safe and housed and fed. So Germaine Greer can spew her infantile paranoia as much as she likes. She can convince herself and other gullible women that the world doesn't need these masculine qualities, but she is deluding herself. Our civilization was built by men. Our communities are maintained by men. We are kept safe by men. Wouldn't it be nice if feminists could stop ridiculing them and maybe even express some gratitude from time to time?

    Men are our fathers and grandfathers, our brothers and sons, our friends and colleagues. It is their masculine qualities that make them what they are. Men are the builders and inventors, the explorers and defenders, the pioneers and the discoverers. We need men, and if Germaine Greer and her fellow feminists don't care about the damage they are doing to men, maybe they should think about what they are doing to women. The "patriarchy" Greer rages against has always been designed first and foremost to keep women and children safe. But if men begin to show the same contempt for women as feminists show for men, then we women are going to be in a lot of trouble. In western nations now there is definitely a hardening of attitudes among men towards women in general. Decades of feminism has taught men that women have nothing but contempt for them. They are beginning to wake up. Feminists who say they want gender equality should be very very careful what they wish for.

    So now I am grown up and I live in Ireland. But whenever I hear some half-witted feminist denigrating men in general, my first thought is always of that brave young man, who risked his life to save two strange women, long ago in the depths of a frozen Russian winter.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • A woman's view as to why men are deserting Western women for Asian women VIDEO
    Feminasty get LADS mags pulled from the shelves


    The BBC did an interview this morning on LADS mags being pulled from the shelves thanks to an action triggered by the UK's feminasty and Object . So the BBC wheel on a feminist and another female who had appeared in one of the LADS mags to discuss the subject. Nowhere did they have a MAN to provide a male perspective in the female run BBC news.

    We do NOT take any side on this subject but we strongly object to the continual smearing of men by these vile feminists who use lawyers to attack issues relating to men, yet do NOTHING about the blossoming clubs putting on male strippers for the predilection of womens sexual fantasy's. Feminists are trying to turn men into mice with their demands and actions that consist of a large group of lesbians, many of them lawyers and social workers involved in the legal system making a massive KILLING from the continual smearing of men in all shapes and sizes. Divorce the main area a golddigging feminist can become an instant millionaire thanks to their very warped agenda. They are a lunatic fringe who have a pathological hatred of ALL things men trying to crush them at every opportunity but WITHOUT any REAL success.

    Gender equality groups UK Feminista and Object joined forces with lawyers to launch the Lose the Lads' Mags campaign earlier this year. They warned that retailers could face legal action if they continued to display the magazines or require staff to handle them. This, they said, could amount to sexual harassment or discrimination in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

  • 'Lads' mags' given cover-up deadline by Co-operative (BBC)
  • Worlds Apart: Sextreme FEMENism VIDEO
    EVER FEEL LIKE YOU'VE BEEN CONNED?
    ladygaga with and without make up
    Lady Gaga with and without the slap

    Guys go out every weekend and get caught in the slap trap thinking
    they have captured a beauty that doesn't look quite so great first thing in the morning .
    Evil lying bitch jailed for claiming rape against five ex-boyfriends
    leanne black British judges bend over backwards to accommodate lying bitches especially when its an ex-wife and a man's estate is being stolen by the legal mafia. Womens aid jump through hoops to help them as well and use them for their man hating agenda.

    Woman is finally jailed after FIVE false rape allegations against her ex-boyfriends in eight years

  • Leanne Black, 32, falsely accused five partners of molesting her
  • Escaped justice for eight years but has now been given two years in prison
  • Judge tells her she has harmed genuine rape victims with her lies

  • A woman who made a string of false rape allegations against five men in eight years was behind bars last night. Leanne Black, 32, repeatedly cried rape with bogus sex assault reports to police after rowing or breaking up with her former partners. In one case, Black claimed she had been drugged and raped. In another she told police a boyfriend kidnapped and molested her.

    A court heard that her innocent partners would have faced up to five years in jail if they had been found guilty of such serious sexual allegations. However, Black was herself jailed for two years, with a judge condemning her actions, telling her that genuine rape victims would be undermined by her lies. The court heard that, in the most recent case in March, her boyfriend Kevin Crowley was held on suspicion of rape after he had called police to report she had thrown plates at him in their flat. David Wooler, prosecuting, said officers arrived at the scene of the domestic argument at the home shared by Black and her boyfriend – and she turned the tables on him.

    Mr Wooler said: ‘When she was questioned by police she told them her boyfriend had raped her while she slept at his flat. ‘It was the most recent in a number of repeated false rape allegations against men since 2005.’ Newport Crown Court heard that, in June 2005, Black had made a rape allegation but the case did not proceed.

    In July 2006, she accused her then partner of raping her twice and also claimed she had been kidnapped and raped. In 2009, she claimed she had been the victim of a serious sexual assault. And in 2010, she fabricated a story about being drugged and raped. Then, earlier this year, she made the accusations against Mr Crowley. But she finally owned up, admitting one count of perverting the course of justice against Mr Crowley.

    Judge William Gaskell told Black, of Cwmbran, South Wales, she had made it more difficult for genuine rape victims to be believed. He said: ‘Police have to take all allegations of rape very seriously. ‘Rape, when it happens, has a devastating effect for victims and causes great trauma. Many women never get over it. ‘Women who make false allegations like you undermine the whole system and police investigations.

    ‘It undermines the public’s belief in the truth when allegations are truthfully made.’ Gareth Driscoll, defending, said Black had entered an early guilty plea and made a full admission. She will serve half her sentence before being released on licence.

    Inspector Rory Waring, of Gwent Police, said the sentence should act as a warning to anyone thinking about making false allegations of rape. He said: ‘As well as causing distress to innocent people accused of this terrible crime, cases like this distract officers from supporting real victims and prosecuting real offenders. ‘Those who have suffered from genuine offences are also undermined.’

    Siobhan Blake, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor in Wales, said: ‘False allegations of rape are extremely uncommon, but where they do occur they are serious offences. ‘Such cases will be dealt with robustly and those falsely accused should feel confident that we will prosecute these cases wherever there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to do so. ‘Earlier this year, the CPS published a report highlighting how rare false allegations of rape and domestic violence are.

    ‘We must not allow these cases to undermine our work to support victims of rape and domestic violence. ‘We want victims to feel able to report the abuse they have suffered and we are working hard to dispel the myths and stereotypes that can be associated with these cases. ‘One such misplaced belief is that false allegations of rape and domestic violence are widespread. We know that is not the case.’

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 9
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 8
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 7
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 6
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 5
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 4
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 3
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 2
  • RADICAL FEMINISTS 1
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE