POLITICS 7

HACKING SCANDAL: IS THIS BRITAIN'S WATERGATE?


David Cameron was forced to cut Rupert Murdoch and his newspaper empire loose from the heart of government yesterday as he tried to deflect public anger about his failure to tackle the phone-hacking scandal. Mr Cameron turned on Mr Murdoch's son James, saying there were questions "that need to be answered" about his role during the phone-hacking cover-up, and criticising him for not accepting the resignation of News International's chief executive Rebekah Brooks. He also admitted that his desire to win support from the company's newspapers had led him to turn "a blind eye" as evidence grew of widespread illegality at the News of the World.

With a newspaper closed, five arrests and more to follow, 4,000 possible victims, a media empire shaken to its foundations and the Prime Minister reeling, the escalating scandal has become a controversy comparable to the US Watergate saga, with ramifications for Downing Street, the media and police. Last night the media regulator Ofcom announced it would contact police about the conduct of Mr Murdoch's empire in covering up phone-hacking allegations, to determine whether it was a "fit and proper" owner of the broadcaster BSkyB, which Mr Murdoch is attempting to buy outright. He is due to fly into London today to deal with the crisis, according to reports. Shares in the broadcaster fell by eight per cent. In a day of further dramatic developments it emerged that:

*Police are investigating allegations that a News International (NI) executive deleted millions of emails from an internal archive, in an apparent attempt to obstruct inquiries into phone hacking. *Andy Coulson was arrested on suspicion of bribing police officers and conspiracy to phone hack, and Clive Goodman, the NOTW's former royal correspondent, was held in a dawn raid on suspicion of bribing police officers. Both were bailed. A 63-year-old man, thought to be a private investigator, was also arrested in Surrey. *Mr Cameron's most senior officials were warned before the last election about connections between Mr Coulson and Jonathan Rees, a private investigator paid up to £150,000 a year to illegally trawl for personal information. But Mr Cameron appointed Mr Coulson as his director of communications.

*A judge-led public inquiry will take place to investigate phone hacking. Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch are prepared to give evidence on phone hacking under oath. *Ms Brooks was stripped of control of NI's internal investigation and faced calls for her resignation from the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg. *Wapping sources warned of worse phone-hacking revelations to come.

At a Downing Street press conference, Mr Cameron defended his decision to appoint Mr Coulson but admitted his relationship with senior members of the Murdoch empire had been too close. "The deeper truth is this... because party leaders were so keen to win the support of newspapers we turned a blind eye to the need to sort this issue, get on top of the bad practices, to change the way our newspapers are regulated," he said. "I want to deal with it." Mr Cameron said he now thought it was wrong to keep Ms Brooks at the company: "It has been reported that she offered her resignation over this and in this situation, I would have taken it."

Mr Cameron was also asked whether James Murdoch remained a fit and proper person to run a large company, following his admission yesterday that he personally approved out-of-court payments in a way which he now accepted was wrong. The Prime Minister replied: "I read the statement yesterday. I think it raises lots of questions that need to be answered and these processes that are under way are going to have to answer those questions." Mr Cameron announced two inquires: one to deal with phone hacking and the failure of the police to properly investigate it, and another into press regulation. He said it was clear that the Press Complaints Commission had failed and the second inquiry would bringing forward proposals for an independent body. Asked what enquiries he had made before employing Andy Coulson, the Prime Minister said: "Obviously I sought assurances, I received assurances. I commissioned a company to do a basic background check."

But the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, said Mr Cameron was still failing to restore confidence in the Government's handling of the scandal: "This is a Prime Minister who clearly still doesn't get it. He is ploughing on regardless on BSkyB. He failed to apologise for the catastrophic mistake of bringing Andy Coulson into the heart of government. "His wholly unconvincing answers of what he knew and when he knew it about Mr Coulson's activities undermine his ability to lead the change Britain needs." Asked if Mrs Brooks should consider her position, Mr Clegg told The Independent: "Yes. The whole senior management has to ask how it could have presided over this without appearing to know what was going on. Someone somewhere higher up the food chain needs to be held to account. You can't just ask journalists, secretaries, photographers and low-paid office workers to carry the can for a failure, on James Murdoch's own admission, of corporate governance."

Watergate Parallels

The Watergate and phone-hacking scandals had small beginnings – a break-in at a hotel, and a single "rogue" reporter and private detective. The News of the World scandal is not just about phone hacking. It is also about statements made to Parliament, personally to David Cameron, and in a court of law which – as James Murdoch has now admitted – were not true. As with Watergate, which brought down Richard Nixon's presidency, the cover-up could have bigger implications than the original offence.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • A question mark now hangs over David Cameron's judgement
  • The distorting power of Rupert Murdoch's media empire
  • Is the age of the Murdoch establishment nearly over?
  • Bullies and cowards (and murderers) who killed the News of the World
  • REAGAN ADDED TO PRESIDENTIAL LACKEY'S BRASS MONOLITHS IN LONDON VIDEO


    REAGAN ADDED TO ROYAL MAFIA'S PRESIDENTIAL LACKEY'S BRASS MONOLITHS IN CENTRAL LONDON
    CAMERON'S RIGHT HAND MAN ASSASSINATED AT GLASTONBURY? VIDEO
    WAS CAMERON'S CONSTITUENCY CHAIRMAN TAKEN OUT AT GLASTONBURY?
    christopher shale MURDERED FOR ROCKING THE ESTABLISHMENT BOAT?

    A senior member of David Cameron's Tory constituency association has been found dead in a Glastonbury Festival toilet.

    The body of Christopher Shale, chairman of West Oxfordshire Conservative Association, was found at about 0900 BST at the music event in Somerset. Police are investigating the cause of death, which the prime minister said had left him and his wife "devastated". Mr Cameron said he had lost "a close and valued friend - a big rock in my life has suddenly been rolled away".

    Mr Shale, who worked in public relations, management consultancy and marketing, was married with three grown up children. He was 56. The prime minister, who has been MP for Witney in Oxfordshire for 10 years, said Mr Shale had been "a huge support over the last decade". The hospitality area where the body was found on Sunday lies between the rear of the Pyramid Stage and the Other Stage. The area is off-limits to most festival-goers, with gates manned by security staff who enforce a strict no-pass, no-entry rule. The backstage bar, which opens until the early hours, is usually teeming after the main stages close. The bar area, which is littered with picnic tables, sculptures and even a small stage, was cordoned off by police after the body was discovered at around 9am.

    It is believed that the mobile toilet in which Mr Shale was found was in the field opposite the bar. People are now moving freely through the area again. "Christopher was one of the most truly generous people I've ever met - he was always giving to others, his time, his help, his enthusiasm and above all his love of life. "It was in that spirit that he made a massive contribution to the Conservative Party, both locally and nationally.

    "Our love and prayers are with Nikki and the family. They've lost an amazing dad, west Oxfordshire has lost a big and wonderful man and like so many others, Sam and I have lost a close and valued friend." Barry Norton of the West Oxfordshire Conservative Association said the news of Mr Shale's death had been a "terrible shock to everybody who knew Christopher." Inspector Chris Morgan, of Avon and Somerset Police, said: "A male was found down by the press office in the toilet area.

    ambulance Unmarked private ambulance used to take Shale's body away from Glastonbury

    "At the moment we are working to establish the cause of the gentleman's death." Later, Mr Shale's body was taken to a local mortuary in a white private ambulance. Police said a post-mortem examination would take place in due course. West Oxfordshire Conservative Party agent Barry Norton said Mr Shale has been a 'tireless worker' In a statement, festival founder Michael Eavis said: "I would like to express my deepest sympathy to the family and friends of the man whose body was found on the site early on Sunday morning."

    Police cordoned off the hospitality area, putting up tape around the backstage shower and toilet area, and a camping area where production teams and some performers stay was also blocked off. Mr Shale, who was in his 50s, features in an article in the Mail on Sunday, which portrayed him as being critical of his Conservative association. In what the newspaper calls a strategy document looking at how to increase association membership - which Mr Cameron is said to be aware of - Mr Shale says that at present there was "no reason to join - lots of reasons not to".

    In the document, he presented a scathing assessment of the social skills and fundraising efforts of his association. More than 137,000 people are thought to be attending the festival at Worthy Farm in Pilton, which ends on Sunday.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE

  • ----------------------------------

    Death on the day prior to his comments

    'There's no reason to join the Tories. We've come over as voracious, crass, always on the take' - Who says so? Dave's own constituency chairman

    There's absolutely no reason to join the Conservative Party – and that’s according to David Cameron’s own constituency chairman, Christopher Shale. In a strategy document seen by The Mail on Sunday, Mr Shale admits that at present there’s ‘no reason to join. Lots of reasons not to’.

    The paper, of which Cameron is aware, presents a scathing assessment of the social skills and fundraising efforts of his association. In a sign of how hard the party is finding it to attract new members, the document concedes that the Prime Minister’s own association gained only 22 members in the past year. Their response is ‘Operation Vanguard’, which is designed to achieve a ‘transformational increase in [West Oxfordshire Conservative Association] membership, in ways others can apply to similar effect nationally’.

    The plan is brutally frank about the failings of the constituency party. Shale writes that ‘collectively we are not always an appealing proposition’. He slams the association’s fundraising efforts, saying: ‘Over the years we have come across as graceless, voracious, crass, always on the take.’ He concludes that people don’t join because they ‘think we’ll beg and steal from them. And they’re right’.

    In what will be seen by many in the party as classic evidence of Cameroon Tory self-loathing, Shale opines: ‘When we are together we are not always a group of people to whom many of our potential members are going to be magnetically drawn.’ He goes on to warn: ‘When we come together as a group we sometimes morph into something different, less attractive. Our [West Oxfordshire Conservative Association] environment alters us.’ His solution is: ‘We must look different – when we communicate, when we’re together. We must sound different – in what we say, how we say it, the language we use, our tone of voice. We must behave differently – try to see ourselves as others see us.’

    Under Cameron’s leadership Tory membership nationally appears to have fallen by about a third, from 259,000 to 177,000. At the same time, local associations have seen their power to select candidates decline dramatically. But Shale’s ideas for increasing membership have little to do with remedying this. Instead, quoting the Prime Minister’s director of political strategy Andrew Cooper – who is, as the chairman proudly notes, another resident of the constituency – Shale argues that offering potential members more politics would put them off. He claims that the country can be divided into two groups, ‘politics heavy’ people and ‘politics light’ ones who aren’t interested in the subject except at General Elections. He calculates that 98 per cent of the population is ‘politics light’ and that ‘politics heavy is a big turn-off for politics light people’.

    Shale likens changing the membership package away from political activity to what Cameron did to the national party: ‘It’s what, pre-2005, DC used to call double ham and eggs: We’ve offered them ham and eggs repeatedly. They don’t want it. So how can the solution possibly be double ham and eggs?’ Instead, under Shale’s strategy, ‘WOCA is, in effect, going into the event-management business’. He thinks that the association needs to offer events with ‘money-can’t-buy appeal’. Even those occasions at the low end of the price scale reflect how well off Cameron’s constituency is. For instance, there is ‘The PMQ DIY Lunch: Bring your own sandwiches to watch PMQs in a different fine country house in the constituency (by courtesy of a PPC member) every week; glass of wine, cup of coffee, informal discussion, yours for a fiver.’ Most constituencies are lucky if they have one fine country house, let alone one for every week of the parliamentary year.

    At the higher end, Shale muses about a trip to America, writing: ‘We might have Just Another Ordinary Day: We’ll organise it but choose how you get there, stay where you like for as long as you like and on one of the days breakfast briefing with a senior staffer, tour of the White House, lunch with a senator . . . yours for cost plus a £1,000 donation to WOCA.’ But reviving Conservative Party membership across the country is not going to be done by updating the coffee morning for the 21st Century or laying on special trips for them. Instead, it needs members to be given a real, substantive reason to sign up. In the modern age, where people don’t join the Young Conservatives to meet a future spouse at a ball, they need to be given a political, not a social reason to become a member of the party. They need to be offered, at the very least, the chance to pick their own candidate and probably far more than that. How many more people would sign up as Tory members if it gave them a real chance to set party policy on tax?

    The Cameroons argue that the membership is too small to make this a sensible move, that the result would be unrepresentative candidates and policies that were unsellable to the public. But unless the party in the country is given some real power, it will continue to wither away. If the Prime Minister’s own association can add only 20-odd members in the year its MP enters Downing Street, what hope is there for other local parties? If the leadership are not prepared to trust their members with some real powers, then they are going to have to find a whole other way to organise the party. Otherwise, it is going to die under them.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Riddle of Cameron's top Tory 'rock' found dead in portable toilet at Glastonbury Festival's VIP zone
  • Did Cameron's 'rock' die of a heart attack 20 hours before his body was discovered in a portable toilet at Glastonbury?
  • Rebel Tory threatened with a 'good hiding' in new bullying row
  • ETON TORY TOFF CAMERON KOWTOWS TO HIS ROYAL DESPOT GROOMERS VIDEO
    SPECIAL INTERESTS GOVERNMENT VIDEO
    POLITICAL PSYCHOPATHS VIDEO
    TYRANNY AND MILLIONS WHO WON'T VOTE FOR THE POLITICAL SCUM
    general election turnout It is a scandal that the main political parties in the UK think they have a mandate to govern when the electorate are deserting a voting system that they know is patently flawed. From the graph it can be seen ever more voters are refusing to take part in a fixed election system yet political parties act more like dictators even when they DO NOT have a majority of the voters support only acquiescence to a seriously flawed democracy that has become increasingly isolated and an enormous threat to our freedoms and privacy.

    Also a feeling by millions of voters that NOTHING WILL CHANGE whether they vote or not and plays into the major political parties who do not have to try so hard when fewer voters can even be bothered going to the polls. A malaise has disenfranchised a nation from political goons who rule with far less support than they claim they have. A form of tyranny comes from flawed elections that no longer represent the aspirations of the many when less than two thirds vote for the scum bags that arrogantly create ever more dysfunctional legislation the long suffering public have endured for far to long. Something has to break and the growing anarchy across the globe must in time give the necessary kick in the backside to the UK sheeple that blindly follow leaders who utterly abuse their positions of power and as if we demand their vile medicine packaged as being good for our future well being.
    DEFINITION OF THE STATE VIDEO
    CAMERON PRESSURED TO RESIGN AS PATRON OF JEWISH NATIONAL FUND
    cameron zionist Pro-Palestinian campaigners claim their lobbying forced the prime minister to withdraw support

    David Cameron has stepped down as a patron of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in a move pro-Palestinian campaigners claim is a result of pressure but which Downing Street insists is part of a general review of the prime minister's charity connections. The JNF was only one of a number of charities from which Cameron stepped down, said Downing St. His predecessors Gordon Brown and Tony Blair continued to be JNF patrons throughout their tenure.

    The JNF was originally set up to buy land in Palestine to establish Jewish settlements before the creation of the state of Israel. Now it is a global charity which describes itself as the "caretakers of the land and people of Israel", specialising in planting forests. Critics say it expropriated land belonging to Palestinians and has obliterated pre-1948 Arab villages by planting forests and parks. The JNF is involved in the demolition of Bedouin villages in the Negev desert as part of an afforestation plan. Sofiah Macleod of the UK-based Stop the JNF Campaign said the organisation's lobbying had led Cameron to withdraw. "There has been a change in public opinion and awareness about Israel's behaviour and there was specific pressure on [Cameron] to step down from the JNF," she said. "We believe he has stepped down as a result of this political pressure. Given the establishment support that the JNF has received, it's not a decision he will have taken lightly." The Stop the JNF Campaign wrote an open letter to the prime minister this month, claiming the JNF had committed war crimes against the Palestinian people and urging his resignation as patron. An early day motion tabled in the Commons in March regretted Cameron was a JNF patron and said revoking its charitable status should be considered. However, Downing St insisted Cameron's resignation was part of a wider review.

    "Following the formation of the coalition government, a review was undertaken of all the organisations and charities the prime minister was associated with. As a result of this review, the prime minister stepped down from a number of charities – this included the JNF," it said in a statement. Traditionally, the leaders of the three main political parties have become patrons of the JNF. However, Cameron's resignation means that none of the current three leaders are JNF patrons. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign welcomed the decision. "It reflects the fact it is now impossible for any serious party leader to lend public support to racism," campaign director, Sarah Colborne, said in a statement.

    "The JNF plays a critical role in facilitating the continued dispossession and suffering of Palestinians." The JNF did not respond to a request for comment. In a letter to the Guardian last October, Samuel Hayek, JNF UK chairman, said: "To accuse the JNF of being "actively complicit in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians' represents a distortion of the truth on the grandest of scales. "Our environmental and humanitarian work is not based on any political or religious affiliation, but rather on supporting Israel and its population – whatever their background. This was the case before the modern state of Israel was created and will continue to be the case long into the future."

    In 1996, the American JNF was accused of mismanaging funds. According to the charges, only 21% of US donations reached Israel, and money was being diverted to Latin American JNF offices. In the wake of this scandal, the North American management was forced to resign.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Jewish National Fund
  • Mark Yudof and his wife, Judy, were the co-recipients of the Jewish National Fund in 1993
  • University of California - President Mark Yudof
  • WHILE HE SCREWS THE COUNTRY THE TORY TOFF BARSTEWARD SPENDS 3/4m ON HIMSELF
    Camerons at number 10 While this evil bastard and his henchmen are impoverishing the most vulnerable and poorest sections of British society NO EXPENSE is spared to ensure he and his family live in opulent surroundings. The UK is LONG overdue getting rid of the public schoolboy toffs that are riding roughshod over our rights to ensure THEY ALONE live in the lifestyles they think they deserve. While these mobsters screw the country they lavish themselves with the best and MUST BE STOPPED. WE HAVE NO DEMOCRACY WHEN THE ESTABLISHMENT CONTROL OUR FLAWED ELECTION SYSTEM.

    What spending cuts? PM splashes out £700k of YOUR money on Downing Street

    David Cameron has splashed out nearly £700,000 of taxpayers’ cash to revamp Downing Street this year, a sum that even members of his own party will find hard to stomach given the cuts the government is asking the British public to endure. The Prime Minister’s expenditure on his historic residence includes £30,000 for upgrading the larger flat above Number 11 where he and wife Samantha and their children live. The couple spent even more of their own money installing a designer kitchen and recreating the sleek décor of their much-missed family home, on the border of trendy Notting Hill in London.

    But taxpayers helped subsidise some of the work on the four bedroom apartment included rewiring, plumbing and energy efficiency improvements. A spokesman said that the couple paid for the kitchen and all furniture and fittings themselves. The other £653,192.34 was spent on work to the Grade One listed offices and reception rooms inside the Georgian house.

    The Cameron’s revamp of their own flat was unveiled this week when Samantha Cameron was pictured with Michelle Obama sitting on a mustard, designer sofa in the new Number 10 kitchen. The expenditure is controversial, as it comes at a time of austerity cuts across government. Mr Cameron has ordered all departments to rein in their expenditure and has even resorted to buying his own Christmas tree to cut costs.

    Even council house tenants have been encouraged by the government to pitch in and carry out their own repairs, to save money on costly contractors. But it seems that the family has not refused the annual grant available to prime minister’s to do up their grace-and-favour apartment. Since the election, taxpayers have had to fund a refurbishment of Number 10 totalling at least £683,102.34.

    The expenditure is revealed in Cabinet Office lists which only record any spending above £25,000. Even more may have been spent on individual works, however, as only items costing more than £25,000 are listed. Michael Dugher, a Labour MP who used to work inside Number 10, said he was astonished at the costs.

    He said: ‘It is not as though the place was falling down, I am not sure what the money is being spent on. ‘At the same time as they are asking ordinary people to tighten their belts, the Camerons are splashing taxpayers’ cash on doing up their own flat. Meanwhile people in council houses are seeing their repairs cut.’ Tom Watson, the Labour MP for West Bromwich East, who has been a prominent voice in the fight for greater government transparency, added: 'When David Cameron entered Downing Street last year he heralded the new age of transparency. Yet when we ask simple questions about what walls he has demolished in a grade one listed building and how much the taxpayer has paid to do this, he refuses to answer.

    'Good Prime Ministers lead by example. I'm afraid he has failed his own transparency test.' However Number 10 sources hit back, pointing out that the programme of work maintenance on Downing Street had been commissioned by the Labour government. Labour ministers had complained that Downing Street was dilapidated and that no major works had been carried out since the 1960s.

    A Number 10 spokesman said: ‘This spend relates to the Downing Street Building Modernisation Programme launched in 2006, under the last Government, to address structural repairs and the renewal of failing infrastructure having gone without refurbishment for some 50 years. 'This programme of work is still ongoing. Downing Street is a Grade I listed building. As such it requires a certain level of maintenance. The Prime Minister has paid for changes to the flat out of his own pocket, beyond the annual maintenance budget threshold.’ One source said: ‘The PM did not turn up on day one and order an expensive renovation. The programme of works was already in place.’ In 2007/08, when Tony Blair was in residence, work at Number 10 cost £1.3million.

    Other prime ministers have also taken advantage of the annual maintenance budget for their personal accommodation, which rose from £25,000 to £30,000 this year. Any refurbishment is also particularly costly because it has to involve the advice of English Heritage for all modifications. The Camerons themselves spent tens of thousands of pounds on their apartment. The kitchen from design company Roundhouse cost at least £25,000 while the sofaworkshop ‘Fancy Nancy’ sofa was more than £1,400.

    The minimalist interior acts as a showcase for other furniture from the Prime Minister’s mother-in-law’s store, Okadirect.com. Downing Street has a second, catering kitchen downstairs for bigger state occasions.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Ultra rich bankers telling us its going to be tough
  • WHAT IS THE DEMOCRACY DELUSION? VIDEO

    PART 2 PART 3
    WHERE DOES THE PARLIAMENT COME FROM? VIDEO

    PART 2
    HOW THE POLITICAL MAFIA USE PSYOPS TO GET YOUR VOTE AND MONEY VIDEO
    WARNING GOVERNMENT USING SOFTWARE TO FALSE FLAG VIDEO'S VIDEO
    ETON GROOMED CAMERON STRUGGLES TO REMOVE TONGUE FROM THE ROYAL ARSE VIDEO

  • Scots on Royal wedding apathy
  • TORY TOFF MASONIC TIE WEARERS
    tory toff masonic tie wearers
    CORPORATE GOVERNMENT FRAUD HIDES TRILLIONS VIDEO
    YES TO ALTERNATIVE VOTING REFERENDUM BROADCAST VIDEO
    GILLIAN DUFFY TAKES ON NICK CLEGG VIDEO
    BRITAIN HAS A LONG HISTORY OF TORTURE AND ABUSE VIDEO

    NOTHING HAS CHANGED
    EX-HOME SECRETARY'S PATHETIC SUPPORT OF UK'S FLAWED DEMOCRACY VIDEO
    THE FORCES THAT PROTECT PRESIDENTS AND PRIME MINISTERS PROTECT TYRANNY
    cameron and obama The 'RULE OF LAW' that the likes of Obama(a lawyer and high ranking mason) and Cameron ( an Eton groomed royalist and high ranking mason) continually stress as how our countries are governed are not 'LAWS' that create 'JUSTICE' for the average Joe, NO their 'RULE OF LAW' is an ancient deception used by the ultra rich to control all us lesser mortals. Freemasonry the key to how that is achieved.

    The legal systems of the 'WEST' are entrenched in 'ANCIENT MASONIC TRADITIONS' were a few mega rich despots use millions of masonic place men in key positions of power to ensure the legal and political barstewards always align their legislation for the betterment of the rich while keeping the peasants in their place. When some of us have managed to release ourselves from the extreme servitude of the lower orders and dragged ourselves out of the gutter , those 'LAWS' Cameron and Obama constantly remind us of are used to put us back in our rightful place at the very bottom of the pecking order. Divorce and civil law has been used extensively to tame any man not part of their creepy network, and to ensure they do not get to wealthy or powerful that may challenge this evil satanic masonic network.

    The 'GAVEL' only one element that reminds us that MASONS control the legal systems across the globe, that keep the ruling elite in the vast opulence they think they are ENTITLED to , while ensuring the peasants remain active members of their enslavement club and who they leech off of at every opportunity. Men for far to long have been weakened and impoverished by a twisted judicial mafia only to happy to use those 'LAWS' to destroy the families of those not part of their creepy establishment clubs.

  • MORE POLITICAL SCAMS HERE
  • MORE LEGAL SCAMS HERE
  • JUDGE A LEADER ON WHO HE PICKS AS HIS HENCHMEN
    cameron henchmen Cameron has been groomed and packaged by the royalist mafia at Eton to create a smooth and sleek image and give the impression butter wouldn't melt in his mouth.

    He , like Blair, talks a good job but the reality couldn't be more different from the utopia he suggests his agenda will lead to.

    One look at his henchmen shows the true nature of the tories who are the utter dregs and scum of the earth, only interested in propping up their ultra rich benefactors while ensuring the richest despot on the planet ,Old Lizzie, remains the commander in chief of Britain's new empire the New World order. We exposed Cameron and Clegg's very first speech after the election full of endless Common Purpose catch phrases and Cameron a 33 degree mason like Blair , who will also ensure orders from the Duke of Kent, the Queen's TOP henchman operating from the United Grand Lodge of England will keep the UK's rulers on track for future world domination under one masonic flag. The EU a stepping stone to world despotic rule.

    With Osborne, Hague, Duncan-Smith and Gove only some of the many ex-public schoolboy millionaires(Hague aside) showing all the signs of humanity and goodness instilled at the wretched private boarding schools they are dumped into by parents with to much money. They hive off responsibility of the care of their teenage children to the dodgy masters while they float around the globe in the endless parties were children are not part of that ULTRA RICH scene. Those children later getting the most select and well paid city jobs, closed to all us lesser mortals. No wonder the UK is in the state its in with cold, ruthless, devious barstewards running the show primarily for the establishment and ONLY the establishment and hand picked by the establishment and who must be part of the establishment.

  • Cameron's government: A guide to who's who
  • NEW UK COALITION GOVERNMENT ARE COMMON PURPOSE MASONIC PUPPETS (VIDEO)
  • ANALYSIS OF 'HATE' CRIME
    Let's suggest a hypothetical situation were a handful of murderers start a group to try and block their former crimes from continuing to be exposed when they are released from jail. Also that one or more have a large stash of money from previous criminal activity that they can use to coerce influential institutions. They create the propaganda and publicity that convinces politicians, judges , editors and owners of the national media to take up their campaign and that having served their time, for maybe some of the most horrific crimes, that ANYONE who continues to publish or speak about those former crimes is actually fomenting 'HATE' . Even though many of the victims families and the wider public believe they should NEVER be released from jail for their murders.

    This is the scenario now being created by two groups under the guise of 'HATE' crimes. Both the jewish and homosexual lobbies have been EXPERT at putting pressure on the political , legal and media mafia's into running campaigns were jewish Israeli murdering across the middle east and murdering homosexual paedophiles and child abusers are NOT to be questioned or challenged as that would be classed, at least from the supporters of these gangsters and perverts as ' HATE' .

    This effectively would stifle debate and dissent on some of the most horrific conduct by these two groups , classing all mention of their criminality as 'HATE'. The world, through a dysfunctional media network, most of it owned by jews, is making very serious aspersions about anyone daring to expose their crimes and the sinister agenda's being forced upon the public to limit the necessity to continue to challenge what they are getting up to , with a facade of respectability their media friends create, while smearing those with an opposing view as 'HATE' mongers.

  • MORE ON THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA NONSENSE HERE
  • MORE ON THE ZIONIST AGENDA HERE
  • PUBLIC URGED TO BOYCOTT CENSUS OVER CONTRACTOR'S TORTURE LINK
    no to census The public are being urged to boycott the census in Scotland over allegations that the parent company of a UK firm contracted to gather information has been linked to the torture of prisoners at Iraq's notorious Abu Ghraib prison.

    Protesters say they are willing to break the law and face a criminal record and a £1,000 fine in an attempt to force the Scottish government to cancel the £18.5m contract it awarded to CACI (UK). The London-based company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of US contractor CACI International, which provided interrogators who worked at Abu Ghraib prison at the height of the prisoner abuse scandal. The prison became infamous in 2004 when disturbing images emerged of US soldiers abusing prisoners. The pictures included naked Iraqi detainees cowering from dogs, and US soldiers were later found to have perpetrated widespread torture. Civilian staff working for private US security companies specialising in interrogation techniques were alleged to have been involved in some of the human rights abuses.

    In August 2003, CACI International provided staff to the US army to conduct IT and intelligence work in Iraq, including interrogation services. The company denies allegations that any of its staff were involved in assaults and has defended itself in US courts against lawsuits brought by a number of former prisoners. In Scotland, the campaign against CACI is being led by a civil liberties organisation called Scotland Against Criminalising Communities (SACC). Richard Haley, the chairman of SACC, said the Scottish government should cancel the contract with CACI and hire another firm. "Of course, postponing the census would be disruptive," he said. "But anything would be better than continuing with the unethical arrangements that the Scottish government seems to believe it is stuck with.

    "It's a matter of record that staff employed by CACI International interrogated people detained without charge at Abu Ghraib. They did so under US rules of engagement that permitted sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation and intimidation by dogs. SACC believes detention and interrogation in these circumstances violate international human rights norms. If the Scottish government won't cancel the contract, I hope that people in Scotland will use census day to say 'no' to this dirty business." Householders are legally obliged to complete and return census forms and could face fines of up to £1,000 if they refuse, but SACC said the risk of prosecution is "slight". Haley said that people angered at CACI's involvement could also choose to supply inaccurate information and that SACC is asking researchers to boycott data obtained in the survey. Some 6,000 temporary staff are being recruited to carry out the population survey in Scotland on 27 March. Questionnaires will be delivered to 2.5 million households.

    CACI's contract is to run the census for the General Register Office of Scotland (GROS) and process the population's responses. The company said it took the Abu Ghraib allegations extremely seriously and that it did not condone illegal behaviour by any of its employees. A statement said: "In spring 2004, an allegation was made that a CACI employee had been involved in the mistreatment of detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. This allegation was not substantiated by any evidence or proof at the time it was made and subsequent investigations by both CACI and the US government could not confirm it. "No CACI employee was ever depicted in the shocking and disturbing photos seen in the press at the time. Seven years on, the allegation remains totally unfounded and unproven. No CACI employee has ever been charged with any wrongdoing. If an employee of CACI had been found to be involved in such behaviour, we would have taken swift and appropriate action. We have, and always will, hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • POWER OF THE PEOPLE IS STRONGER THAN PEOPLE IN POWER VIDEO
    THE POWER OF POLITICAL NIGHTMARES: THE WAR ON TERROR VIDEO

    PART 2 PART 3
    HYPOCRITICAL WESTERN LEADERS ON THE NORTH AFRICAN REVOLTS VIDEO
    CAMERON SUPPORTS HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT
    Pinch yourself! A Tory Prime Minister is upholding the idea that traditional morality is bigotry

    On countless occasions, David Cameron has declared that he is a tremendous fan of the institution of marriage. So big a fan, it now becomes clear, that he generously intends to bestow its status and privileges far beyond what most people consider marriage actually to be. Time and again, the Tory leader has used his promise to strengthen marriage so as to reassure people that he was fully committed to defending this core value of conservatism. Now, however, it is becoming all too plain that he is signing up instead to the wilder extremes of political correctness.

    Indeed, he is planning to go further than even New Labour dared to tread. Eat your heart out Harriet Harman, patron saint of equality! For it was revealed yesterday that ministers are planning to change the law to allow homosexual couples to ‘marry’ in religious ceremonies, including in church. Gay partnership ceremonies in other venues will also be allowed for the first time to contain a religious element, such as hymns or readings from the Bible. These unions will then be called ‘marriage’.

    For sure, this change doesn’t force religious institutions to introduce such ceremonies; whether they do so is up to them. But the Government’s position is anything but neutral. For it implicitly endorses the idea that there is nothing wrong with overturning centuries of Biblical understanding of the sacrament of marriage as the union of a man and a woman. As such, the Government will be cutting the ground from under the feet of religious traditionalists. And what if churches refuse to conduct such a travesty of a marriage ceremony? Presumably, they would then risk being sued for ‘discrimination’.

    Truly, we are fast reaching the stage where upholding Biblical sexual standards will become the morality that dare not speak its name. Once again, we have to wonder at the way in which a politically motivated faction within a tiny minority of the population — for many gay people do not approve of this ideological gay rights agenda — is now running public policy. When I argued here a few weeks ago that this agenda was all about destroying moral and sexual norms, I provoked a storm of protest. But once again, we can see that this is all too true. For Cameron’s latest idea proposes to make a mockery of marriage.

    Gay rights supporters contend that there can be no justifiable objection to extending the status of marriage to those who are not heterosexual. Gay or straight — what does it matter, as long as two people are committed to each other? But those who make this argument merely reveal they have no idea of the significance of marriage. They seem to think it’s just another contractual arrangement involving a binding (or not so binding) commitment — like buying a house or a car. But the truth is that marriage is a unique institution because it involves the process by which humanity reproduces itself — which is only through the union of male and female.

    The fact that some married couples are childless is irrelevant. The sole reason marriage has universal value is that it is vital for the healthy nurture of the next generation. This is because children need to be brought up by the two people who created them. Activists argue that gay people should be able to get married because everyone is entitled to the same status. But why should this be the case if their sexual circumstances are different? If the status of marriage is extended to other relationships — and that includes giving marriage rights to heterosexual cohabitants, as England’s most senior family judge, Sir Nicholas Wall, recently so unwisely recommended — the institution will be undermined.

    If still in doubt, try this thought experiment. Imagine the Government was planning to recognise polygamy and polyandry (marriage with more than one woman or man), or marriage between ‘zoophiles’ (people who have ‘loving and committed relationships with mammals’, or bestiality to you and me) and their, er, partners. If you think this is merely grotesque satire, you would be sadly out of date. There are now campaigns in North America to recognise the ‘equal rights’ of such people and end ‘discrimination’ against them.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • IS YOUR COUNTRY A DEMOCRACY OR IS YOUR GOVERNMENT A DESPOTISM ?
    Suffrage does not define nor does it produce democracy, for electoral voting takes place in totalitarian, fascist, communist, and National Socialist (NAZI), i.e., anti-democratic, states. Having been elected, there is nothing to stop government from imposing control of an upper house, reneging on pledges, nor from adopting any tyrannical measures it chooses.

    Viz. The word ‘democracy’ is widely abused and ‘defined’ incorrectly:

    Democracy is a state of society realised neither by referenda (mass voting for new laws), nor by suffrage (electoral voting for representatives), nor by the representatives’ majorities’ legislatorial voting. Electoral voting, majority rule and ‘consensus politics’ neither create nor define democracy.

    THE WORD.

    To preclude arbitrary (i.e., tyrannical; illegal) government and establish liberty and equal justice for all, the Hellenes created the society in which the common people have the power in Trial by Jury to judge the laws and overrule laws and measures enacted by the national assembly. The word the Hellenes gave to describe this state of society in which the citizens have control through the Trial by Jury to judge, make and enforce the laws and overrule the government, the wealthy and powerful, the aristocrats and all the people who sought to rule them, was demokratia, which translates into English as Democracy.

    Democracy is founded on the Trial by Jury, derived from the Hellenic Athenian Constitution of government by Trial by Jury. Through its etymology, history and signification, the word democracy designates the constitutional justice system. Modern Constitutional Democracy is based on the sovereignty of the individual citizen-juror as the final arbiter of law and protection of the people from tyranny. The Hellenic Athenian Constitution of government by Trial by Jury was a conspicuous achievement in human history for constitutionally establishing this unique mode of justice. The aristocrat Cleisthenes it is who must be credited with the creation of mankind’s first democracy in 508/7 B.C.E. (although ‘infant’ in form, as it did not yet give equality to women and permitted slavery). He brought acknowledgement to the need to spread empowerment throughout society to promote equal justice, liberty, peace and prosperity, and devolved power all the way down to the poorest (male) citizens, the thetes, by recognising rights, exousia.

    Exousia rights included the right to attend, debate and vote in the national assembly on laws and measures (referenda); the right of the accused to a Trial by Jury; and, crucially, the empowerment of citizens by bestowing on them judicial authority as Jurors in Trial by Jury in which laws and measures passed by legislatorial majorities in the assembly could be judged, overruled and annulled * whenever this was deemed by the Jurors necessary to serve justice, liberty, and the interests of the people. *See Works, vol. 2; by co-author of the U.S. Constitution, Justice James Wilson.

    Democracy created the illustrious Athens which successfully resisted the Persian invasions of 490 and 480/79 at the battles of Marathon and Salamis; that built the Parthenon; set enduring standards in art and architecture; developed sciences including those of medicine, mathematics and astronomy; that proffered a stage to Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides and Aristophanes; and laid the foundations of Western rational and critical thought. Hellenic Greece of the Constitution of government by Trial by Jury received from the Athenians the defining epithet, Democracy. The historical facts about Democracy in Hellenic Greece and everywhere else, are that it was a virile system and devotedly supported by the mass of just, civilised, peace and freedom-loving people. Democratic free Athens eventually only succumbed because of the mighty invasion of the Macedonian, Alexander the Great (conqueror), who emplaced his generals as autocrats to rule by might over right, with force against democracy’s egalitarian system of equal justice and civic liberty. Otherwise, the Hellenic Culture would almost certainly have evolved into the development of equal rights for women, emancipated the slaves and outlawed slavery 2,000 years ago. Alexander’s far-flung martial exploits set back the socio-political development of mankind.

    Naturally, people have the moral responsibility, the right and the duty to resist and suppress injustice wherever it occurs, and by whomsoever it is perpetrated, governments notwithstanding. By definition and in practice, Democracy requires that the People at all times retain the Supreme Power to annul injustices and the bad laws made by fallible politicians. This Power is uniquely embodied in the Citizen-Juror’s Duty in Trial by Jury: to judge the justice of every act of law enforcement, and to render the Not Guilty Verdict whenever conviction or punishment of the accused would be unfair, according to the juror’s conscience.

    In legem terræ* common law (constitutionally inscribed into Magna Carta in 1215), it is the jurors’ duty in the Trial by Jury Justice System to judge the justice of the law and every act of enforcement and acquit any persons accused under an arbitrary, unjust or apocryphal statute, regulation or prosecution. Trial by Jury is the central tenet and sole justice system of the People’s legem terræ common law which is superior to statutes or regulations made by national or local governments and the rulings of judges. * terræ is pronounced terry, the ‘æ’ as in Cæsar, seize.

    Consider Harlan F. Stone, U.S. Chief Justice 1941-1946, on the Juror’s Duty in the authentic Trial by Jury, as follows:

    "If a juror feels that the statute involved in any criminal offence is unfair, or that it infringes upon the defendant’s natural God-given unalienable or Constitutional rights, then it is his duty to affirm that the offending statute is really no law at all and that the violation of it is no crime at all, for no one is bound to obey an unjust law.

    "That juror must vote Not Guilty regardless of the pressures or abuses that may be heaped on him by any or all members of the jury with whom he may in good conscience disagree. He is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and convictions and not someone else’s. The law itself is on trial quite as much as the case which is to be decided." U.S. Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone; Harvard Law Review. (Emphases added.)

    ETYMOLOGY (linguistic derivation)

    Hellenic Greek, Demokratia, Democracy. demos, the people; kratos, sovereignty*, power; kratein, to rule.

    *Perseus Digital Library, Tufts University. See Democracy Defined Essay EIS#10, "We the People and the Matter of Words," downloadable for free from the Democracy Defined Campaign Material webpage. Chambers Dictionary, etymology, demos, the people; kratein, to rule; MSN Encarta. Democracy, demos, the people; kratein, to rule; etc.

    From the etymology comes the definition: Democracy, the form of government in which the Sovereign Supreme Power is vested in the Common People; the emancipation and ethos of society produced by the power of Juries of ordinary citizens in Trial by Jury, to vet, make, decide and enforce the law; the people rule. In order to understand the meaning of the word, it is essential to know first that democracy embodies the people’s responsible control over government and law through the Trial by Jury. The people control the government, not the other way around. The people rule. This is democracy.

    The power, right and duty of Jurors to decide the verdict according to their convictions and conscience has been established in common law since time immemorial, at least since the pre-historical incipience of judicium parium, "The Judgement of Equals" --- the Trial by Jury Justice System. This is because it is a definitive part of the Juror’s Duty to uphold Justice by protecting the ordinary people, the meek and innocent, from the crimes of lawlessness and injustice inflicted by those in positions of power. This protection against crime is a fundamental purpose of Trial by Jury, which is put into effect by the Juror pronouncing the Not Guilty Verdict to annul the enforcement of cruel or unjust laws, bad governance, the prejudices, corruption or incompetence of judges; and likewise by the cost-free private prosecutions (see below) by ordinary citizens in Trial by Jury of malefactors including those who acquire positions in government and abuse their power. Later, England’s King Alfred, 871 - 899, upheld the established right and duty of jurors to find the verdict according to their judgement; see: The Illegal "Selection" of Jurors, Campaign Philosophy webpage Three.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • DEFENSE AGAINST THE PSYCHOPATH VIDEO
    BRITAIN ON THE BRINK
    We have been recording and reporting for many many years endless cases of blatant human rights abuses and the harassment and persecution by the UK's judicial terrorists who have been getting away with murder for so long. The use of psychiatric gulags to shut down those prepared to stick their heads above the parapet who are chemically lobotomized in secret wards where masons disguised as psychiatrists use chemical coshs to destroy an activist's spirit.

    No need to use guns and batons just a quick injection of toxic chemicals will silence the most dissenting of voices.

    Now we are seeing headlines even in their complicit media of how masonic cops are being used as spies in every area of our lives but especially those prepared to stand up and fight the ruthless agenda being imposed on a country whose citizens are virtually devoid of the weaponry required to protect themselves from the masonic thugs blatantly misusing OUR laws and courts along with their judicial terrorists . ACPO The Association of Chief Police Officers has been operating a covert spy ring that has been ruthlessly abusing police powers to thwart anyone who dares interfere with the masonic agenda of protecting the ruling elite that includes the monarchy and the many masonic henchmen who they require to secretly carry out their persecution campaigns.

    Britain does not operate like other countries such as Tunisia and openly attack those who dare to challenge its evil powers they have a far more sinister way of HIDING how they destroy and silence dissenters. The UK sheeple should be looking at the uprisings across the globe and realise it will only be a matter of time before these silent murders increase to a point were all our lives are threatened.

  • How UK's spying cops squandered millions of pounds, with flash cars, luxury flats and up to 14 hours' overtime a day
  • TORY TOFFS ONLY WORK FOR THEIR RICH BACKERS

  • Revealed, how cash from City tycoons is propping up Tories
  • TO THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT VIDEO
    CAMERON'S NEW MEDIA GURU IS SON OF DISGRACED CHIEF CONSTABLE IAN OLIVER
    craig oliver ian oliver Controversial police boss quits

    The police chief who ignored widespread demands for his resignation has bowed to growing pressure and quit his job. Dr Ian Oliver had been under pressure to step down as chief constable of Grampian Police since Monday when an independent report condemned his force's handling of a child murder inquiry.

    Dr Ian Oliver, talking to BBC News 24, says: "This has been trial by tabloid and by television" He will officially stand down on May 24 but has effectively served his last day in the job after Grampian Police Board waived his statutory notice. Dr Oliver at first said he had no intention of leaving before his retirement date of June 1.

    The news that that will go early was welcomed by the Secretary of State for Scotland, Donald Dewar, who earlier in the week called on Dr Oliver "to pack his bags and go". The announcement was made on Friday by the Grampian Police Board. Its chairman, Pat Chalmers, said he regretted an earlier suggestion that Dr Oliver was seeking a financial settlement other than the pension he was entitled to.

    He said: "This was the deal that had to be brokered to move us forward. "If occasionally one has to placate someone who is really a broken man now, then so be it." Mr Dewar issued a statement praising Dr Oliver's many achievements during a distinguished career with the police. The BBC's Legal Affairs Correspondent, Joshua Rozenberg, said that the two statements seem to have been enough to persuade Dr Oliver to stand down.

    Report highlights police failings

    The Grampian Police Board asked Dr Oliver to step down after the publication of a report into the way in which his force handled the inquiry into the murder of Scott Simpson. The nine-year-old was murdered by a convicted paedophile last summer.

    Scott's disappearance was at first treated as little more than a missing person inquiry and when his body was eventually found after five days, it was in an area already searched by police. The report pointed to a lack of leadership and maladministration.

    Dr Oliver had already agreed to take early retirement after a tabloid newspaper exposed details of his private life. In February he was pictured apparently embracing a married woman in a secluded woodland car park.

    Councillor George Urquhart, of Grampian Police Board tells BBC News 24: "The sooner he goes, the better" But Dr Oliver said on Friday night there were broader constitutional issues at stake. "If a police board can act in a way where it flouts recognised statutory procedures and the secretary of state for Scotland can prejudge an issue in which he has a statutory role, then that augurs very badly for democracy. "If I can be got rid of in that way, who is next?"

    Oliver pleased with apologies

    Dr Oliver's solicitor, Niall Scott, said: "All that is really happening, in effect, is that his resignation takes affect on May 24. "He has been particularly pleased to see the chairman of the police board, Pat Chalmers, has apologised for remarks he previously made. "In addition he is very pleased that the secretary of state for Scotland has issued a positive statement about Dr Oliver's contribution."

    The solicitor for Scott Simpson's parents said they were pleased with Dr Oliver's decision. Dr Oliver's deputy, David Beattie, took over as acting chief constable of Grampian on Friday night.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Camerons new media guru Craig Oliver
  • BBC journalist appointed as Cameron’s new communications chief after Andy Coulson’s departure
  • Disgraced former Grampian Police chief has a new job training Afghan police
  • PM's new aide is shamed cop son
  • COUNCILLOR CRITICAL OF MASONIC CHIEF CONSTABLE CHARGED WITH FIDDLING EXPENSES
    ian oliver CAMERON'S NEW MEDIA GURU'S FATHER A FORMER CHIEF CONSTABLE AND HIS SORDID PAST

    COUNCILLOR WAS LATER ACQUITTED AFTER THIS SORDID ABUSE OF POWER BY A MASONIC CHIEF CONSTABLE.
    (FROM 1998)

    SECRET surveillance of two councillors began because one of them was an outspoken critic of controversial police chief Ian Oliver, it was claimed yesterday.

    Brian Topping and Ian Tait are on trial charged with fiddling council expenses, but claim they have been victimised. Mr Topping's solicitor, George Mathers, told Aberdeen Sheriff Court his client became the subject of surveillance around the same time he was involved in a series of police board meetings to decide the disgraced chief constable's future. 'Someone has gone to inordinate lengths and incredible expense to discredit one or both of these men,' said Mr Mathers. The SNP councillors are alleged to have claimed individual travelling expenses after sharing a car on the 92-mile round trip between their Fraserburgh homes and Aberdeen on three occasions. Officials secretly filmed the pair as they left meetings at Aberdeen City Council's headquarters. David Hughes, the authority's chief auditor, said recordings were made of the two men as they left the council HQ in February and March this year.

    Mr Topping was widely regarded as Dr Oliver's most vocal critic at that time, when the Grampian Chief Constable was embroiled in a row over calls for him to quit. Mr Mathers said: 'Councillor Topping, on occasions when he thought it was necessary, was outspoken with regard to the chief constable.' It was also suggested by Mr Math-ers, and by Mr Tait's defence agent Gordon Macgregor, that Mr Tait had become the subject of surveillance because he questioned possible irregularities in the expenses claims of the council' finance director, Alex McLean. Mr Hughes denied he had been directed by the finance director to get evidence 'to nail' the men, and to get police involved so the councillors could be 'publicly pilloried'.

    Mr Topping, 43, and Mr Tait, 55, deny fraud. The trial before Sheriff Colin Harris continues.

  • SOURCE NOW PULLED
  • CAMERON HOSTED FREEMASONS EVENT AT WESTMINSTER
    mason women

    Very occasionally the mass media leak out an article that confirms what the hell is going on and proof against those who claim its all just a conspiracy theory. We missed this one the first time around. This article also confirms once again women are freemasons and no doubt most of the hatchet faced wimmin who are MP's in the Tory, Liberal and Labour parties are part of this evil network of power.

    Tory leader used House of Commons facilities to host an event for the West Oxfordshire Lady Freemasons

    David Cameron used House of Commons facilities to host an event for the freemasons, documents released 4 Feb 2010 reveal. The documents cover dining facilities in the Palace of Westminster that were hired by members of parliament to host events for outside organisations.

    The Tory leader hosted a tea event for the West Oxfordshire Lady Freemasons on 28 October 2008. The records show that the event was held in dining room C and 14 people were expected. The documents released today cover the period from 1 April 2004 to 30 September 2009, and run to 255 pages.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • IT TAKES AN OUTSIDER TO SEE JUST HOW ROTTEN THE UK CAN BE
    I am not suggesting this country is as corrupt as Tunisia and similar regimes. But believing their country is best blinds citizens to the erosion of sacrosanct values.

    The country, we are told, is fully accountable and getting more so. If that were true Tony Blair would not have been so cocky when recalled by the Chilcot inquiry. He might have been fearful that he would be obliged to reveal all his correspondence with George Bush.

    But nobody will make him. Why not? WHY NOT? The agony of the soldiers' families in the room was audible as the master of deceit brazened it out. They sobbed and they learnt the lesson: there is no comeuppance for the prime minister who made bogus claims and took us to war. Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general then, gave Blair legal advice, but Blair says he turned that into a "political" message. How much more proof of manipulation do we need? Blair devotees in the media still say he was a brilliant statesman, the finest there was. What I see is a Western supremacist, a warmonger (Iran next, says he!), a gun-toting US Republican groupie, a Catholic convert who has no conscience about the war dead (British or Iraqi), a consummate actor.

    Here is one dictionary definition of corrupt: "immoral or dishonest, especially as shown by the exploitation of power or trust for personal gain". Blair's dubious record has led to staggering personal enrichment. His coterie has done just as fabulously. Peter Mandelson, our erstwhile business secretary, has just taken up a lucrative job as consultant for Lazard, the American investment bank that advised Kraft on its controversial takeover of Cadbury last year. Indecently soon to be cashing in, we might think. Modern political morality dictates that that's all fine. Nobody ever says that British politicians are "corrupt". Just not done. British police too are believed to be unimpeachable. What a shock it is for the public to hear about undercover infiltrators, and (we must assume) agents provocateurs, who have gained the trust of and entry into campaign groups – most of them legitimate and exercising their right to oppose official policies. Sex romps with the enemy were the permitted perks. So when demos go violent, as the student ones did recently, I hope we will ask whether people were paid by the police forces to inject some excitement and distractions.

    In Kenya, meanwhile, policemen were photographed shooting dead three unarmed suspects – a horrifying story. Rob Macaire, our man in Nairobi, condemned the officers and others who frequently use violence against the people they are meant to protect. But we too have our law-and-order thugs. Ian Tomlinson died after being struck by a police baton. Jean Charles de Menezes was shot because officers thought he was a terrorist, and there have been many more down the years. No country in the world has a spotless police force. But here, guilty officers almost always walk free or are retired, bypassing punishment for their crimes.

    The same goes for other state agents. Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, is dropping charges against yet another secret services officer accused of complicity in the torture abroad of Muslim men. Evidence has built up to show that Britain actively cooperated with US "extraordinary rendition" carried out in some Arab states, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and elsewhere, but no one can be nailed in our secretive state. Our ministers, including the ex-foreign secretary David Miliband and ex-home secretary Jacqui Smith, have not been questioned in detail on these violations. Teflon politicians and spies slip away without a scratch. Andy Coulson must expect the same as he leaves Downing St, even though the News of the World phone-hacking scandal happened on his watch and won't go away. He knew nothing, says the smooth spin-doctor, and there it will rest. The Met has been lackadaisical with this investigation, and we need to know why, but won't. Nor I imagine will there be too many reports on how Mr Coulson brought together Rupert Murdoch and David Cameron. Such machinations, we are told, must be confidential. Of course.

    I am not suggesting this country is devoid of probity and is as corrupt and opaque as Tunisia and similar regimes. But believing their country is the best blinds citizens to the steady erosion of values and principles that should be sacrosanct. Britain is losing the moral authority to lecture other nations on good governance and justice. The powerful don't understand that a national reputation needs to be constantly renewed. Those of us who came to stay, who left behind lands of chaos and institutionalised barbarism, who have always admired this democracy, are apprehensive. Soon Great Britain will be no more, and all of us on these isles, old and new Brits, will feel the loss.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • TORY TOFF OSBORNE AND HIS SPYING FRIEND COULSON VIDEO
    YOUR GOVERNMENT IS A CULT. SOCIETY IS A CULT VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    ASYLUM SEEKER CHILDREN TO BE MOVED OUT OF UK DETENTION GULAGS VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    PROTESTERS SHUT DOWN TOPSHOP IN BIRMINGHAM VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
  • Tax group vows to hound Tax avoiding Zionist ‘Sir Philip Green the grinch’
  • AXIS OF EVIL: BRITAIN, AMERICA AND ISRAEL
    Western media endlessly pumps out propaganda about global terrorist threats and makes the very dangerous assumption that men and their families are most at risk from middle eastern sources. This is maybe the biggest lie of all in that the chance of a single man being damaged by any foreign threat is far less than winning the lottery.

    The biggest threat to men and their families comes from the political/judicial mafia that have done enormous damage under the veil of foreign false flag terrorism, that Israel's mossad has masterminded while using America and Britain to not only do its dirty work in securing the Middle East for its expansionist agenda but that within the political and legal systems of the UK and USA lies a Zionist clique who use freemasonry to control anyone not part of their Zionist structure. Victims know only to well about the use of the most horrific psychological torture inflicted by zionist controlled judicial thugs and their lawyer minions while watching their mass media pump out propaganda about threats from the middle east who will NEVER have the same power and control the legal mafia have over those they destroy in our courts high jacked by the same forces.

    We are being duped by Zionist run media both in America and UK with virtually every major tv station Zionist controlled , even the public broadcaster the BBC has Zionists heading the main network policy, particularly in news coverage. How are they doing all of this? They are fraudulently and corruptly controlling the major political parties by funding and blackmailing them into carrying out their 'Friends of Israel' agenda. Freemasonry is rife in both America and UK and is a means to control the goyim through satanic rituals that follow closely the Kabbalah to ensure allegiance to Israel's Zionist fanatics and to further Israeli supremacy. Vigilance and expanding our knowledge of how this has been carried out, not only recently but for centuries, will ensure mankind finally puts an end to a system that has been causing chaos across the globe and how their media always find an alternative means of explaining away murdering Zionist targeting coming from some other source other than the masonic/zionist mafia who are taking extreme measures to destroy and control heterosexual men not part of their creepy network of power. It will be those very men they target that will ultimately have to find the solutions to this centuries old network of devious power and control.

  • MORE ON ZIONISM HERE
  • DANNY ALEXANDER'S QUESTION TIME CAR CRASH VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    CLOUDS OF SECRECY: GOVERNMENT CHEMTRAILS VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    PART 2 PART 3
    TORY TOFFS ANSWER, CUT JOBS, CUT BENEFITS ERADICATE THE POOR VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    HAZEL BLEARS DESCRIBES LABOUR AS THE NASTY PARTY VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    STUDENTS RIOT OUTSIDE TORY PARTY HEADQUARTERS LONDON VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
  • Thousands of students attack Tory HQ in protest at tuition fees rise
  • Crippling 30-year graduate debt trap will see parents paying instalments as their children go to university
  • Bring down the Government, says student march organiser
  • Failures in student fees protest intelligence to be investigated
  • WE DO NOT LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY VIDEO

    FULL SCREEN
    THE POLITICAL PARTY GAME IS OVER STAND AND FIGHT
    john pilger The lesson of the French anti-government protests is that “normal” politics exists only to promote corporate interests. Britain must prepare for a rebirth of the only thing that works — direct action.

    Born of the "never again" spirit of 1945, social democracy has surrendered to an extreme political cult of money worship. This reached its apogee when £1trn of public money was handed unconditionally to corrupt banks by a Labour government whose leader, Gordon Brown, had previously described "financiers" as the nation's "great example" and his personal "inspiration". This is not to say parliamentary politics is meaningless. It has one meaning now: the replacement of democracy with a business plan for every human activity, every dream, every decency, every hope, every child born.

    No rationale

    The old myths of British rectitude, imperial in origin, provided false comfort while the Blair gang built the foundation of the present "coalition". This is led by a former PR man for an asset stripper and by a bagman who will inherit his knighthood and the tax-shielded fortune of his father, the 17th Baronet of Ballintaylor. David Cameron and George Osborne are essentially fossilised spivs who, in colonial times, would have been sent by their daddies to claim foreign terrain and plunder.

    Today, they are claiming 21st-century Britain and imposing their vicious, antique ideology, albeit served as economic snake oil. Their designs have nothing to do with a "deficit crisis". A deficit of 10 per cent is not remotely a crisis. When Britain was officially bankrupt at the end of the Second World War, the government built its greatest public institutions, such as the National Health Service and the arts edifices of London's South Bank.

  • SOURCE