WHY ARE POLITICAL LEADERS LYING MOST OF THE TIME?

Why is uncontrolled greed so prevalent in corporate rooms? Why do wicked men wage wars of aggression and become indifferent to the killing of innocent people? Why does materialism seem to trump everything else? Why do we have the uneasy feeling that our society is going in the wrong direction? The very fact that we have to raise such questions may be a sign of the times. Indeed, when the stench of moral decay becomes overwhelming, bad things inevitably follow. Historically, it can be shown that when the moral environment in a society is deteriorating, problems tend to pile up. We are presently living in one of those times, characterized by deep and entrenched political corruption, by routine abuse of power and disregard for the rule of law in high places, and by unchecked greed, fraud and deception in the economic sphere. The results are all there to see: Severe and prolonged economic and financial crises, rising social inequalities and social injustice, increasing intolerance toward individual choices, the disregard for environmental decay, the rise of religious absolutism, a return to whimsical wars of aggression (or of pre-emptive wars), to blind terrorism and to the repugnant use of torture, and even to genocide and to blatant war crimes. These are all indicators that our civilization has lost its moral compass. With all these throwbacks to an unpalatable past, it is not surprising there is a resurgence of interest nowadays for questions of morality and of ethics. The contradiction between modern problems, new scientific knowledge and the inadequacy of our prevalent source of morality or of ethics, which are mainly religion-based, has led a humanist like me to write a book, “The Code for GLOBAL ETHICS, Ten Humanist Principles”, [ISBN: 978-1616141721] prefaced by Dr. Paul Kurtz and published this year by Prometheus Books. The book is a down-to-earth discussion of ten basic humanist principles for our new global context. Why such a renewed interest in the moral dimension of things? —First, partly because many of our problems and threats are not only severe but they have also become global in nature. —Second, the fact that we seem to be unable to solve our global problems might also be because our scientific and technological progress is advancing much faster than our moral progress, with the consequence that problems arise faster than our moral ability to face them and to solve them. —And third, this is also partly due to the fact that the old religion-based rules of morality are of little help in solving these new problems, basically because they belong to the past and because, unfortunately, they have not incorporated new scientific knowledge. Indeed, humans' vision of themselves in the Universe has been forever altered by three fundamental scientific breakthroughs: - Galileo's proof, in 1632, that the Earth and humans were not the center of the Universe, as suppposed holy books have proclaimed. - Darwin's discovery, in 1859, (“On the Origin of Species”) that humans are not some god-like creatures unique among all species, destined to live forever, but are rather the outcome of a very long natural biological evolution. - And, the Watson-Crick-Wilkins-Franklin's discovery, in 1953, of the structure of the double helix DNA molecule (Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid) in each of the 46 chromosomes in human cells, and the devastating knowledge that humans share more than 95 percent of the same genes with chimpanzees. I would add, also, that ongoing research about how the human brain functions has cast new light on how some phenomena, such as different thoughts, including religious thoughts, are generated in different zones of the brain. Therefore, nobody can claim anymore that the Earth is the center of the Universe; nobody can claim that humans are unique in the scale of things; and nobody can claim that the human body and the human mind are two unrelated entities. This knowledge has tremendous consequences for our moral stance. My best hope is that we will avoid falling back into an age of obscurantism and of decadence, and that we will be able to build a truly humanist civilization for the future. SOURCE Bliar Lord Of The Lies

ELECTORAL COMMISSION CONSPIRE WITH TORY TOFF OVER DODGY DONATIONS VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

UKIP LEADER ATTACKS PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

TIGHTLY TWISTED ESTABLISHMENT CLIQUES RUN BRITAIN VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

TERRORIST WALTER WOLFGANG AND NEW LABOURS'S THUGS AND BULLYBOYS VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE Walter Wolfgang, victim of the crack down on free speech

HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN BY UK'S MASONIC ESTABLISHMENT VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE ENFORCED CHILD MIGRATION BY THE THUGS AND PERVERTS RUNNING BRITAIN

ENFORCED CHILD MIGRATION BY THE THUGS AND PERVERTS RUNNING BRITAIN

This is NOT ONLY an historic problem as even today the SAME mindset operates in British courts and with the Crown's judicial mafia destroying families and their children in a draconian legal system Child migrants: A group of British children pictured in 1953 at Melrose House near Parramatta in New South Wales (left). Brown to make historic apology to thousands of British children sent to colonies Gordon Brown is set to apologise tomorrow for the UK's role in sending tens of thousands of children to former colonies where they suffered terrible abuse. The Prime Minister is due to express the Government's regrets over the child migrants programme in a statement to the House of Commons. Under the scheme, which ran from the 1920s to the 1960s, an estimated 150,000 poor youngsters aged between three and 14 were sent to a 'better life' in Commonwealth countries such as Australia and Canada. However, many ended up being abused in foster homes, state-run orphanages and religious institutions. Children were often told their parents were dead, while parents were given very little information about where their offspring were going. Survivors have told how on arrival they were separated from brothers and sisters, and subjected to brutal physical and sexual abuse by those who were meant to be caring for them. The premier's spokesman said the issue is something he feels strongly about. Mr Brown announced he was planning to apologise in November when Australia's prime minister Kevin Rudd said sorry for his country's part in the tragedy. The United Kingdom is the only country with a sustained history of child migration, spread over four centuries. As early as 1618, 100 children were sent from London to Richmond, Virginia. Britain's High Commissioner to Australia, Baroness Amos, said in a statement last week that the apology would be an 'important milestone'. 'Over the past few months I have met many whose lives were blighted, and heard their personal stories,' she said. 'We want not just to bear witness to the past but to look forward to a future where these terrible events will not be repeated.' Harold Haig, Secretary of the International Association of Former Child Migrants and their Families, said: 'For many former child migrants and their families, the apology will help to heal a painful past.' The wording of the apology by Mr Brown is believed to have been discussed with charities representing former child migrants and their families. Sixty survivors have apparently been flown to London so they can listen to the statement in person. The PM is also expected to make an announcement about future support for those affected. SOURCE

POLITICAL CORRUPTION AND COLLUSION VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

HOUSE THEFT ON A GRAND SCALE BY THE STATE

Labour seizing homes while offices in Whitehall are empty Labour was today accused of "rank hypocrisy" over new laws to seize private property as it emerged that scores of government-owned homes and acres of Whitehall office space are lying vacant. New research showed that ministerial grace-and-favour flats - including palatial apartments for the Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary - are unoccupied. The Highways Agency also has 103 homes empty for more than six months, with six habitable houses vacant for more than 12 years. New Parliamentary answers re- vealed that Whitehall has a further 260,000 sq ft of empty office space - equivalent to 62 acres of vacant rooms - largely because civil servants have moved out of London. The state's failure to use its own properties was in sharp contrast to "draconian" new legal orders and should abolish the Empty Dwelling Management Orders, which give town halls the power to seize private homes that lie empty for as little as six months. At EDMO hearings councils have tried to seize the home of a blind man, grab an old man's house as soon as he died in a nursing home, and confiscate the home of a mother caring for her injured daughter in France. However, EDMOs cannot be used against government property. "It is a scandal that homes owned by the Government lie empty for years, while bully-boy laws let state bureaucrats seize the homes of the dead and vulnerable. "It's the height of Labour hypocrisy.We will scrap these draconian powers. Instead focus on renting or selling off the inefficient acres of government real estate. This will save taxpayers' money and put more homes on the market." Empty government properties include: The Foreign Secretary's Grade I-listed flat in Carlton Gardens, vacant since 2007 as David Miliband prefers to live at home in Primrose Hill. David Blunkett's former grace-and- favour flat, empty since April 2007 and recently occupied by squatters. Three Admiralty House flats - for Lord Malloch Brown, Lord Falconer and Geoff Hoon - costing £173,000 a year each to run. Ministers refuse to rent them out to civil servants. Mr Shapps said the Tories would open up Whitehall databases of surplus land and buildings to public inspection and transfer all central government property into publicly owned asset companies. SOURCE

THE REAL BENEFIT CHEATS? THE STASI RANKS OF HARD LABOUR

I'd love to see the benefit cheat ­advertisements remodelled, to target public sector expenses fraud. You could have a lord, ­pegging out the washing, and then big, scary writing … "You in the wig! We're on to you. Your mother's house in Carmarthenshire is not your primary residence … You do not spend £174 a day in legitimate expenses … One day soon, we're going to be very peeved." Of all the cheats civilisation can conceive – from MPs through dodgy tax-domicilers, insider dealers and hedge-fund scamsters to cheats so rotten with bad faith that they nearly brought down global finance before anybody stopped to think whether or not they should be illegal – nobody gets it stuck to them worse than the person who did a night cash-in-hand in the pub, as well as claiming jobseeker's allowance. Benefit cheats might account for 6,000 prosecutions a year, but their cost to society – an estimated £1.1bn annually – is considerably less than the combined loss, to the benefits office, caused by honest mistakes (£1.1bn in punter-error, £800m in mistakes committed by the Department for Work and Pensions). It's interesting, isn't it, that the DWP makes that many errors in its own system: it must be pretty complicated. In fact, it's so complicated that means-tested benefits, combined with means-tested tax credits, go unclaimed to the sum of £16bn. For every pound you spend, ­taxpayer, on the dishonest underclass, you save nearly £16 by virtue of bureaucracy so complicated that neither the underclass nor the overclass can understand it. What a result! It's all so obvious, it sounds like 1980s agitprop. I'll be on about single mothers next, and how most of them are doing a really good job. It's not, however, so obvious that Labour's manifesto team isn't re-examining the issue, really trying to think outside the box of human decency and push the envelope way past out of order, all the way to "are you kidding?". Jim Murphy, the Scottish secretary, has suggested to Ed Miliband, Labour's manifesto co-ordinator, that people who inform on benefit cheats should get a share of any cash saved. This probably won't even make it as an election promise: they just leaked it so they could sound like tough guys, talking turkey with the Tories. "Huh! Remember that soppy liberal you couldn't stand? We binned him! Adios old Labour, goodbye New – hello Hard Labour. Feel my pecs." I've heard nothing from any party that sounds more like the Stasi. How much more old Labour can you get? Since it probably isn't serious, should we even bite? But this kind of "initiative" is not just a short cut to an image makeover. Critics have said already that, were this measure to be introduced, it would unpick social cohesion and encourage neighbourly mischief rather than meaningful snitching. But this is to pass over the social dissonance that is created even before policy is drafted, when politicians engage in this coarse, wilfully ignorant rabble-rousing. Numerous studies have established that people greatly overestimate the cost of benefit cheating, both absolutely and compared to white-collar crime. It has been found that people across the political spectrum are more judgmental towards the very poor than they were 20 years ago, often inaccurately assuming them to be lazier and more fiscally ­coddled than in fact they are. "The extent to which people manage to fiddle the system to their own advantage is greatly overstated in popular imagination and fed by the tabloid press. But you only need one well-documented case to damage confidence." That was John Denham, the Labour MP for Southampton Itchen, commenting just before the Labour conference last year. It's not just the tabloids, though, is it? They get quite a lot of help from the top ranks of the party in government. And it's not really one well-documented case. More like an amorphous mass of feckless, poor people that Hard Labour is going to get really, really tough on. On the same day as this supergrass wheeze was leaked, a Populus poll, commissioned by the Times, found that 70% of voters believe Britain is now broken; three-fifths of respondents said they "hardly recognised the country they're living in"; and 42% would emigrate if they could. In fairness, much of this "broken" rhetoric was started by David Cameron. You can tell because, when you bite it for authenticity, like a jeweller from the olden days, it turns out to have no meaning at all. But a more courageous government wouldn't even get into this landscape the Tories insist upon, where the feral unemployed run riot in town centres while their unmarried babymothers leech bennies off the state to spend on cigarettes and Diamond White. A government of integrity and coherence would insist upon sticking to the facts: that the cheats are offset by the people who don't claim, so the benefits bill is nothing like the spiralling cashfest it's made out to be; that benefit cheats are not the scourge of the economy, their numbers are not huge, and their crimes are not major; and even the real eye-openers – the football referee on disability benefit, the couple claiming housing benefit for numerous addresses – are notable for their perversity, not to mention rarity. This is Primark policy-making: it looks cheap, and it is cheap. But it's not free and it's not victimless. SOURCE

THREE MP'S AND PEER TO FACE CHARGES OVER EXPENSES

Its a small miracle that anyone working for Britains corrupt crown would be charged.We can only wait and see what if any punishment is dished out, as ever these things are seldom dealt with properly when its political crooks they are supposedly punishing. Prosecutors charged three Labour MPs and a Conservative peer with false accounting on Friday over alleged abuses of the parliamentary expenses system. They are Labour's Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Jim Devine and Paul White, Lord Hanningfield. "In four cases, we have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges and that it is in the public interest to charge the individuals concerned," said Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer in a televised statement. Morley is a former environment minister. He faces two charges of dishonest claims for mortgage expenses. Chaytor faces three charges of dishonest claims, while Devine faces two charges for making claims based on false invoices. The BBC reported that the three had issued a joint statement denying the charges and vowing to "defend our position robustly." White faces six charges, centred on numerous claims for overnight expenses for staying in London when records show he was driven home and did not spend the night in London. He could not immediately be reached for comment. While only four legislators face criminal charges, the scandal over parliamentary expenses has tainted several hundred MPs. An official report released on Thursday found that 390 of them had filed excessive expense claims between 2004 and 2009 and should pay pack a total of over a million pounds. Many of the claims were for household items deemed trivial by auditors, but some MPs stand accused of more serious abuses such as "flipping," or changing which house they declared as their main home in order to maximise second home allowances. SOURCE

THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN- THE WAY OUR GOVERNMENT CAN BE VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

GOVERNMENT LIES VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

CHERIE BLAIR'S STEPMOTHER VICTIMISED FOR WHISTLEBLOWING

Cherie Blair's stepmother was branded a "f****** b****" and her relatives "sneered at" after whistle-blowing about a "chaotic" charity where she worked as a teacher, an employment tribunal heard today. Steph Booth was accompanied by Tony Booth, the father of the former prime minister's wife, at the hearing in Manchester against her former employers, Cool UK Ltd, based in Burnley and Manchester. Mrs Booth worked as a teacher for the charity which offered a "radical and experimental alternative" to traditional education to help teenagers excluded from school by teaching them vocational subjects such as health and beauty, construction and vehicle maintenance. But she claimed the organisation, contracted by local education authorities, was "chaotic and unprofessional", said staff were unqualified, some bought and downloaded porn on the premises and one worker there was even jailed then considered for re-employment. When she raised the issues with the charity's boss, Gareth Binding, she was constantly brushed off then subjected to a campaign of victimisation for whistle-blowing, she said. Mrs Booth, who has been selected to stand as a Labour candidate for the Calder Valley constituency in West Yorkshire in the next election, also said Mr Binding tried to destroy her reputation and credibility by writing letters which were seen by the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown. Matters came to a head with her boss at a stormy management meeting in February last year. "Mr Binding's behaviour towards me was aggressive and derogatory in front of colleagues," she told the tribunal. "In fact he said I was a f****** b*****. "My accent and my education and my relatives were all sneered at. Mr Binding had demonstrated he had no intention of addressing any of my concerns." She then went sick before being made redundant a month later, just under a year after joining the charity in April 2008. Mrs Booth said she was assaulted by one female pupil, but there were no proper health and safety policies. Buildings were cold and unsuitable for youngsters and the charity was "failing" the children it was supposed to be teaching, she said. One worker was accused of being a "ringleader" in regularly buying porn at the Burnley unit, but when she complained Mr Binding said she was just being "fussy". Another member of staff, who she claimed had downloaded porn, was jailed for driving whilst disqualified but it was then considered he should be re-employed after leaving jail because he would be desperate for a job and accept a pay cut, she said. After she left the charity Mr Binding then tried to "sabotage" her campaign to be selected to stand for Labour in Calder Valley she said, by writing a series of letters questioning her suitability as an MP. Some were sent to the party's ruling National Executive Committee, while others went straight to the top, she said. "He wished to victimise, punish and discredit me," she said. "One letter was copied to Prime Minister Gordon Brown, and one was addressed to the Prime Minister directly." Mrs Booth is claiming unfair dismissal, breach of contract and suffering detriment or dismissal due to exercising her rights under the Public Interest Disclosure Act and on health and safety grounds. Mrs Booth married Mrs Blair's actor father in 1998, a year after Tony Blair's New Labour swept to power. SOURCE

YOU ARE A SLAVE TO THE GOVERNMENT VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

QUANGO KINGS AND QUEENS EARN UP TO £5000 A DAY FOR PART TIME WORK

A select group of quangocrats are earning up to £5,000 a day for part-time work on state agencies, authorities and commissions, research reveals. Among them are quango 'kings and queens' who jump from state job to state job with the help of Government patronage. The report found that nearly 1,000 individuals made an average of £356 a day last year from their state-appointed positions as board members of public bodies. Among them 92 quango chairmen earned on average £642 a day - with the best-paid, Sir Callam McCarthy of the Financial Services Authority, taking home £4,972 a day. Quango board members regularly sit on more than one publicly-funded body, the TaxPayers' Alliance report found. It looked at 100 of the biggest quangos, which provide paid seats for 932 board members, including 96 chairmen. On average a quango chairman picked up £49,793 last year for a two or three-day week. Ben Farrugia of the TaxPayer's Alliance said: 'Our study suggests that instead of serving taxpayers' interests, some non- executive members and chairs may put their quango's interests first. 'Many senior figures are career quangocrats, moving from one quango to another. 'With a pressing need to save money by cutting these quangos back, these individuals could be a serious barrier to any Government hoping to save money. 'Serious action needs to be taken to increase democratic control over quangos so they are genuinely accountable to ordinary people.' The report found that 1,620 people were appointed to places on the boards of quangos and NHS advisory bodies in the financial year that ended in March. One in six chairmen said they were politically active, with Labour supporters outnumbering Tories by more than eight to one. However, the report said that in the last year the Conservatives were in power, quango appointments-were skewed in the same way towards Tory supporters. On average, a quango board member took home £8,538 - mainly for attending occasional board meetings. Of the 932 quango board members, 47 served on more than one public body. The report said: 'Quango board appointments are something of a carousel, with members and chairs repeatedly moving from one board to another.' 'Named and shamed' MPs called yesterday for public sector organisations who pay excessive salaries to managers to be 'named and shamed' by a Top Pay Commission, they said. The Commons Public Admininstration Select Committee said the watchdog should be created to police benchmarks for pay. It also called for public sector salaries and bonuses to be published, in the same way as those for private firms. SOURCE

AS WE EXPOSED THE TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE IS AN ARM OF THE TORY PARTY

Tory tax allies 'subsidised' by the taxpayer Taxpayers' Alliance accused of using charitable arm to claim gift aid on donations from wealthy backers Though the Taxpayers' Alliance denies it is a 'Conservative front organisation', it is influential in party circles: in October, George Osborne, above, proposed a public sectory pay freeze recommend a month earlier by the alliance. A campaign group which claims to represent the interests of ordinary taxpayers is using a charitable arm which gives it access to tax relief on donations from wealthy backers, the Guardian has learned. The Conservative-linked Taxpayers' Alliance, which campaigns against the misuse of public funds, has set up a charity under a different name which can secure subsidies from the taxman worth up to 40% on individuals' donations. In one example, Midlands businessmen said they channelled funds through the Politics and Economics Research Trust at the request of the Taxpayers' Alliance after they asked the campaign group to undertake research into policies which stood to damage their business interests. The arrangement allowed the Taxpayers' Alliance to benefit from Gift Aid on the donations, a spokesman for the donors said. Labour politicians attacked the apparent scheme as hypocritical, and tax accountants warned it could breach charity law, which states that organisations may not be charitable if they have political purposes. Regulators at the Charity Commission have opened several assessment cases and are scrutinising the arrangements. "The Taxpayers' Alliance appears to be exploiting the taxpayer rather than protecting their interests as they claim to do," said John Prescott, the former deputy prime minister. "This body ought not to be subsidised to pursue its political goals. They have now become properly the non-taxpayers' alliance." The Taxpayers' Alliance is one of the most influential pressure groups in the country and has established close links to the Conservative party frontbench. It campaigns for less waste in government and lower taxes, and earlier this year it emerged that it is funded by leading Tory donors. It claims to represent "a grassroots army of 32,000 supporters" but it has also emerged that a director of the alliance, Alexander Heath, does not pay British tax and lives in France. Its chief executive, Matthew Elliott, strongly denies the alliance is "a Conservative front organisation", but it is influential in Conservative circles. In October the shadow chancellor, George Osborne, proposed a public sector pay freeze which had been recommended a month earlier by the alliance, and Elliott, who describes himself as "a free-market libertarian", proposed that no public worker should earn more than the prime minister without the chancellor's approval before Osborne announced it. The Charity Commission's records show the charitable arm was established as the Taxpayers' Alliance Research Trust in 2007, before changing its name to the Politics and Economics Research Trust. Elliott is named as its main contact and the trustees include leading Taxpayers' Alliance supporter Patrick Barbour, the founder of Reform, a free-market thinktank which advocates lower tax and public spending. Until he became leader of the UK Independence party last month, Lord Pearson of Rannoch was also a trustee. The trust received donations worth £373,230 in 2008 and approved 29 grant proposals amounting to £278,520 with the stated aim "to advance the education of the public" and to "promote for the public benefit research into matters of public taxation, public policy, applied economics and political science". Unusually for a charitable trust, the accounts do not name the grant recipients. The Midlands Industrial Council, a powerful business group which has donated £1.5m to the Conservatives since 2003 and represents the owners of private companies in the car, haulage, property and construction industries, said it has donated both through the Taxpayers' Alliance, which as a company does not attract tax relief on donations, and the Politics and Economics Research Trust, which does. "The charitable arm is where specific projects are being researched on specific topics," said David Wall, the council's secretary. "We donated for work they were doing predominantly on congestion charging. When there was talk of it coming to Birmingham, we asked them to look into road charging to see what the likely effect would be on the haulage industry. We were asked for funding to the charity which means they can benefit from gift aid. I know that some industrialists made donations through the charitable arm." Asked about the impression that the alliance was in effect benefitting from a subsidy from taxpayers to carry out work funded by rich businessmen, Elliott declined to comment. "I will talk about the work of the Taxpayers' Alliance, I will talk about Christmas, but I don't want to talk about this," he said. "We are confident that our funding arrangements fall within the law and the guidance of the Charity Commission." The Charity Commission's guidelines on campaigning and political activity state that "an organisation will not be charitable if its purposes are political". It states that trustees must not allow the charity to be used as a vehicle for the expression of the political views of any individual trustee or staff member. A leading tax accountant said it was extraordinary that the alliance appeared to be benefitting from charitable tax relief. "Donors are typically saving tax on their contributions and so the government is chipping in between 20% and 40% to help the Taxpayers' Alliance with its work," said Mike Warburton, a tax specialist at Grant Thornton. "Your readers may be surprised that an organisation which argues for lower taxes and lower public spending is asking the government to do that for its research arm." The Charity Commission has opened several "assessment cases" prior to a possible investigation. SOURCE

MP's EXPENSES VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BERLUSCONI PUNCHED IN THE FACE VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

MANDELSON FACES PROBE OVER FAVOURS FOR OLIGARCH

Lord Mandelson is facing a fresh inquiry into accusations that he did 'improper' favours for his Russian billionaire friend, Oleg Deripaska. A German MEP has demanded that the European Commission investigate what she claims is the Business Secretary's 'conflict of interest' when he twice lowered aluminium tariffs during his time as Brussels Trade Commissioner. Those moves directly benefited Mr Deripaska, whose company Rusal is the world's largest aluminium concern. Allies of Lord Mandelson say he was already a close friend of the controversial oligarch and had dinner at least twice with Mr Deripaska in Moscow in the year before the tariff was lowered in December 2005. The two men later discussed trade issues at one of Moscow's most exclusive restaurants and shared a holiday last year when Lord Mandelson stayed on Mr Deripaska's luxury yacht off Corfu. Both were dinner guests of billionaire financier Lord Rothschild and his son Nat at their luxurious home on the island. The potential conflict of interest arose because Rusal wanted the European Commission to exempt it from tariffs that had been placed on Russian and Chinese aluminium producers in 2001 after allegations they had been dumping cheap aluminium foil in Europe. Channel 4's Dispatches programme, to be broadcast on Monday, has uncovered a document which shows that on December 20, 2005, Lord Mandelson himself signed off the decision to exempt Rusal from these anti-dumping tariffs. German Christian Democrat Dr Ingeborg Graessle is now planning to make Lord Mandelson's involvement with Mr Deripaska a centrepiece of a review she is conducting into the code of conduct for EU commissioners. While Lord Mandelson was a commissioner he had no legal requirement to declare potential conflicts of interest, but Dr Graessle wants that changed. She is demanding a probe of the trade deals overseen by Lord Mandelson so better rules can be drawn up. Shown the paper that proves Lord Mandelson signed off the decision himself, Dr Graessle said: 'This is a completely improper doing. When you have a close friend who profits from your decision, what else can you say but that it is a conflict of interest?' Dr Graessle said Lord Mandelson would have protected himself from claims of impropriety by declaring his friendship with Mr Deripaska. 'I think that he should have declared it and we don't see that these declarations,' she said. 'We cannot exclude that this personal relationship influences the decisions he has to take as a commissioner.' Lord Mandelson has always maintained that he played no role in the decision. His spokesman said yesterday that those who have argued that he could have withdrawn from the process 'do not understand how Brussels works'. He said: 'A German MEP saying this comes as no surprise. Germany fought tooth and nail against the lifting of aluminium tariffs which were hitting Italy and many other member states. 'This had nothing to do with Russia and in the end a compromise was struck, not by Peter, but by the member states themselves.' It is the second time in the space of a week that the deputy prime minister in all but name has faced embarrassing disclosures about his friendships with the wealthy. Lord Mandelson enraged relatives of the Lockerbie bombing victims when it emerged he was recently a guest with Colonel Gaddafi's son at a shooting weekend hosted by billionaire financier Lord Rothschild and his son Nat at their French-style chateau in Buckinghamshire. Saif Al Islam Gaddafi flew the Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi home to a hero's welcome. SOURCE

AWARENESS TRAINING FOR VICTIMS OF LEGAL AND GOVERNMENT ABUSE

More people are beginning to realize that in every respect we all live on what can best called a "Global Plantation," social systems in which those who control resources and wealth of the world are perpetrators of large scale legal and government abuse that serves to perpetuate rule by elites.. Finally, what many people do not realize is that aside from the war, pollution, epidemics, and poverty, the social systems imposed upon us by the elites produce emotional sickness. They produce psychological depression, anxiety, substance abuse, sexual problems, obesity, and many other forms of disturbance that plague millions of people across the globe. The mechanisms for this are quite simple. The stress of living in highly regulated societies, with a predatory legal system results in a population which reflects the mental conditions of wounded, exploited, and bullied people. Moreover, we are tracked and watched through computers, and increasingly the entire industrialized world is being videotaped and monitored constantly. This is the beginning of a dehummanization process to which will alienate us from our individual nature and reduce to cogs of production wheels in their factories, offices and other companies. The disturbances may come about from being a party in a long, protracted, and ugly lawsuit. This now afflicts millions of people in the United States. The disturbance may come about from a random IRS audit (or several of them!) The disturbance may come about through extortion by a bureaucrat, or false arrest, or "forfeiture of assets", because a stranger used your property for an allegedly criminal purpose. Marriages are torn apart by the stress of coping with the abuses of government and the legal system, relationships with friends, relatives, children, and the ability to enjoy life can be twisted inside out. Our potential to live happy, productive, and fulfilled lives is being robbed from us every day by a malignant and parasitic class of lawyers, judges, and government officials who are in their essence second tier masters on the Global Plantation. We are the victims. But too few people realize the victimization becomes a psychological problem, that is, a problem that affects your mind and your behavior. Once they rob us of our peace of mind and dignity, once they make us sick, we need a healing process. I believe, as do a number of mental health professionals, that the most effective therapy for emotional disturbance caused by government and legal abuse is radical and militant activism directed against its sources, wherever that may lead. What do I mean by "radical activism." I refer to picketing, demonstrations, sit-ins, organizing public communications, and in general the kind of conduct that transforms society, produces changes, and puts the wrongdoers on the defensive. When you suffer in silence, when you allow the wrongs to stand without seeking redress and accountability, when you avoid demanding justice, you have become part of the problem. You have told yourself that you will set aside reclaiming your dignity and demanding justice for whatever reason. But you have essentially betrayed yourself and accepted being a victim. That cannot possibly be an emotionally healthy decision. It is also likely to produce serious physiological symptoms over time Hours of traditional psychoanalysis will not ever be as therapeutic as organizing a picket line. Prescription anti-depressants may help, but they are only masking the source of the problem. Some people feel self-conscious about being in public. Others feel they ought to pray for those that hurt them. These thoughts are, in effect, self-destructive as they serve to perpetuate the victimization.. To where do we trace the origins of our problems? On a daily basis, the face of the Global Plantation deceives. While a policeman, lawyer, or government functionary may appear to be oppressive, and most certainly act accordingly, the Phaornic pyramidical structure of the " System " leads upwards. But the string pullers behind events are not always transparent. The identification and role of power elites in the United States as well as in all other countries has become a subject of both academic and popular focus. Because the power elites play such a significant and arguably destructive role, and have earned the legitimate wrath of billions of people, the activism we prescribe need be directed, at least in part , at them. They are the foundation heads, media moguls, and political powerbrokers. They are the controllers of multinational conglomerates, financiers of major political parties, and intelligence czars. They are the folks who own and govern the Global Plantation at the highest levels. They are formidable adversaries and they will break the law and perjure and murder and conspire and never be held accountable except by the people. They , for all practical purposes, own the courts. The policies of local judges are directed through large institutional think tanks in Virginia, Washington D.C., and Santa Barbara, California, not at the grassroots. Those who are here today know very well of whom I speak. To those who shy away from rebellion, I say you are going to miss the greatest of human endeavors, and your illness will remain. To those who want to be healed, get a sign, get a pen or go to your computer or fax machine, and start agitating. There is a process for launching this on a massive scale that the legal reform movement needs to consider, right now, today, to win back our Constitutional freedoms and rights. I believe large scale awareness training, such as the techniques used in the human potential movement, are of immense value. There is a branch of psychology known as radical therapy which must be utilized where people resolve the psychological wounds to them by becoming activists. I am beginning this process to deal with the retaliation brought to my household for exercising First Amendment rights. The world cannot wait for business as usual to solve these problems and we have a mission, a burden to use evangelical terms. To turn their System upside down. The tools are there, money will not be a problem and we will produce thousands of activists with a heightened consciousness to take on the Establishment. I want to do this project. As the son of a radical psychologist and as a lawyer activist for may years I believe I am qualified.Work with me, and make miracles happen fast. SOURCE

SELF-RIGHTEOUS HARMAN DOES A HIT AND RUN WHILE DRIVING USING A MOBILE

Harriet HATEMEN must be the most wicked and devious MP next to Margaret Thatcher. She endlessly pontificates about the law then totally ignores the law when it suits her own circumstances. Harriet Harman prosecuted for car offence One of Britain's most senior government ministers is to be prosecuted for motoring offences, including using a mobile phone while driving, prosecutors said on Thursday. Harriet Harman, Labour deputy leader and a top lawyer, is accused of driving without due care and attention and using a hand-held phone when she was involved in an incident in Peckham, southeast London, in July. "The Crown Prosecution Service has decided there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute ... Harriet Harman," it said in a statement. According to press reports, Harman a former Solicitor General, had collided with a parked car. She stopped briefly at the scene but then drove off without leaving details of her insurance company or her car's registration. If found guilty Harman faces fines of up to 6,000 pounds, could have penalty points imposed on her driving licence, and magistrates could ban her from driving. Publicity surrounding the prosecution itself is likely to be of concern for Harman, generating embarrassment as Labour prepares for national parliamentary elections due by June 2010. The opposition centre-right Conservatives are predicted to win the election, with polls putting them well ahead of Labour. The law banning motorists from using hand-held phones while driving was brought in by the Labour government in 2003. Prosecutors have even argued that those found guilty of the offence should be jailed. SOURCE

GUBMINT AND HOW GUBMINT WORKS

Once upon a time the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert. Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night." So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job. Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?" So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions, and one person to do time studies. Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing the tasks correctly?" So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One to do the studies and one to write the reports. Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?" So They created the following positions, a time keeper, and a payroll officer, Then hired two people. Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?" So they created an administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary. Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one Year and we are $18,000 over budget, we must cutback overall cost." So they laid off the night watchman. NOW slowly, let it sink in. Quietly, we go like sheep to slaughter. Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.... during the Carter Administration? Anybody? Anything? No? Didn't think so! Bottom line. We've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency...the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember! Ready?? It was very simple...and at the time, everybody thought it very appropriate. The Department of Energy was instituted on 8-04-1977. TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL. Hey, pretty efficient, huh??? AND NOW IT'S 2009 -- 32 YEARS LATER -- AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS "NECESSARY" DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR. THEY HAVE 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES; AND LOOK AT THE JOB THEY HAVE DONE! THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY, "WHAT WAS I THINKING?" Ah, yes -- good ole bureaucracy. AND, NOW, WE ARE GOING TO TURN THE BANKING SYSTEM, HEALTH CARE, AND THE AUTO INDUSTRY OVER TO THE SAME GOVERNMENT? HELLOOO! Anybody Home?

DEFINITION OF DESPOTISM VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

GOVERNMENT IS FORCE! VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

WELSH ASSEMBLY MEMBER EXPELLED FOR CALLING QUEEN ,MRS WINDSOR VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BNP DEBACLE ON BBC QUESTION TIME

For anyone not aware of our position yet on the BNP, we do NOT promote any major political party never mind the BNP. We have made this clear on many occasions when we have received BNP articles both within and outwith the group that we do not entertain any of their policies. However last nights debacle on Question Time that caused such an uproar has to be dissected and the BBC facade of self righteousness removed to expose the underlying hypocrisy of the three major political parties use of Nick Griffin to make themselves look better when in fact they are almost as devious and dangerous as the BNP leader himself. David Dimbleby as ever ensures he shuts down ANY issue that is not on the BBC agenda . Question Time has for a long time been a propaganda machine for the three major political parties that have all been involved in the massive fraud and corruption emanating from Westminster, not only throughout its history, but most recently in the expenses scandal. Others on the panel alongside the BNP's Nick Griffin were Lib Dem panelist Chris Huhne Labour's Justice secretary Jack Straw Tory peer Baroness Warzi American playwright Bonnie Greer The only panelist who came out squeaky clean was Bonnie Greer a Black American who had far less of a political agenda to attack Griffin for his form of ethnic cleansing policies. Anyone who has studied the propaganda from the BNP will know where they stand so rather than waste this opportunity to further attack a party that is already ridiculed for its extreme right wing views we will focus on how the BBC and the major political goons have used Griffin's presence to give themselves an air of respectability and how the BNP are being used by a complicit media to undermine potentially, other smaller parties , by focusing and promoting the three major political parties that have received so much attention in the British media for to long who are all funded and controlled by the British establishment . They also speak with the same establishment tongue and gives the public very little option on who to vote for come election time thanks to how they are allowed to hog what political time is available on a complicit media. The first issue to be addressed is the exposures this week that the BBC is being run by a bunch of cokeheads. We have known for a very long time cocaine use by BBC employees is rife but to have seen this in the public domain removes ANY air of moral righteousness the BBC and Dimbleby tries to constantly make the public believe, in that they are telling us the truth. Question Time has a rigid format that Dimbleby ensures does NOT digress into areas forbidden by their public school boy management who control the BBC output. Jack Straw maybe for the first time on national TV mentioned his Jewish background and no doubt can justify his support of an Iraqi invasion when Kuwait was being threatened but turns a blind eye to Israel attacking Gaza . Our group promote jewish writers who are highly critical of Zionist jews who head the banking systems of the world that have caused the latest credit crunch and who believe Jewish dynasties like the Rothschild use masonry to ensure Zionism and Israeli interests are centre stage when political decisions are being made, not only in the Middle East, but worldwide. Straw has proven Zionist leanings as was Lord Goldsmith the attorney general at the time of the Iraq war , who gave the legal position on the invasion. They both show clearly a Zionist view of that war and Straw looked hypocritical in his attacks on Griffin when much of the audience and most of the country continue to be duped about the underlying agenda's and propaganda that continually distracts attention away from the shadow government that is really behind many of the policies of the three main parties who are merely the goffers for those interests. Britain unlike America has been completely stripped of its peoples ability to protect itself from a tyrannical government . The growing police state has reduced the population to accepting NOT a democracy but a dictatorship of political goons who despite their apparent DIFFERENCES all eat out of the same gold encrusted trough and who swear allegiance first and foremost to a monarchy who with its vast array of masonic hierarchy dominate every area of our lives . Many of the activists on this group know the repercussions when they dare defend themselves against a ruthless judiciary and thug cops who head this system and some of those activists have been dragged into psychiatric gulags and been forcibly injected while those major parties have been in power and fully aware of how the UK bully boys deal with any dissent. The facade created once again by Question Time and the appearance of Griffin provides the necessary platform for those major parties, to continue to spout the rhetoric that UK citizens have rights and freedoms, when the fact remains that they will carry on with their class ridden policies to ensure the UK establishment and its myriad of hangers on continue to enslave the vast majority of the population who have yet to waken from the masonic slumber the British media propaganda has put them in. THIS GROUP AIMS TO CONTINUE TO RE-EDUCATE THOSE AS YET TO FACE THE TYRANNY OF THE COURTS THIS MOB HAVE CREATED. QUESTION TIME WITH NICK GRIFFIN Thursday 22nd October 2009(THE FULL VIDEO) Lord Goldsmith's advice on Iraq invasion 'flawed', says former top judge BNP leader Nick Griffin flounders in front of Question Time audience as protesters riot outside TV studios Of all the New Labour toadies, Jack Straw must be the worst The old fascist Lizzie joins MP's attacking BNP to make themselves look respectable

TONY BLAIR GETS HECKLED ON VISIT TO MOSQUE IN HEBRON VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

UK GOVERNMENT LOVES ORWELLIAN NEWSPEAK VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

INTERVIEW WITH IRAN'S MAHMOUD AHMEDINEJAD VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BROWN THE SICK MAN OF EUROPE

ESTABLISHMENT ‘COLLUDING IN PLIGHT OF SICK MAN BROWN’ The Prime Minister, Gordon Brown * WORSENING OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER * SEVERE DEPRESSION CONTROLLED BY DANGEROUS DRUGS * FAILING SIGHT IN ‘GOOD’ EYE “The Prime Minister of Great Britain is a man too ill to be holding the Office.” This was the conclusion last week of a senior civil servant liaising regularly with Gordon Brown. For reasons which will become clear, the person involved will not go public with the evidence for this conclusion. The same applies to a high-ranking Treasury official who told us “In both a physical and mental sense, the Prime Minister is a very sick man, seriously disabled.” Three years ago, an Opposition MP told nby “He is on extremely heavy doses of cutting-edge anti-depressants, but so far they have made little difference”. And during the last fortnight, another high-ranking government source claimed “He is now on pills which restrict the foods he can eat and what he can drink. He is losing the sight of his good eye quite rapidly. It’s a mess, and nobody knows what to do”. Rumours have circulated about Gordon Brown’s health for a number of years. As long ago as 2004, Simon Heffer wrote in the Spectator that he displayed many signs of Asperger’s syndrome: humourlessness, lack of irony and obsessional behaviour patterns. Nby itself ran a long piece in February 2007, predicting fairly accurately how Brown’s rigid responses to given situations would prove to be inappropriate, and his behaviour in the end dysfunctional. We noted at the time ‘If the Labour Party can organise seventy-three signatories to a document of intent named ‘Anyone but Gordon’, then there must be something about the man which might make him unfit to be Prime Minister’. In fact, we had already been advised by then that the PM had been on large doses of SSRI anti-depressants – the class of drugs derived from Prozac. The overall story is well known in lobbyist circles. A senior member of this group told us that “Brown is in a very dark place. Sarah [hiswife, Mrs Brown] has begged him on several occasions to seek help, but he resists most offers of advice.” Yet another popular journalist said “I’m afraid all the stories about him throwing things around and screaming at secretaries are entirely true. He behaves impeccably in public and can really turn on the charm when he needs to in private – but inside the bunker he behaves appallingly. He’s also binging on junk food late at night – you can see he’s gaining weight”. However, our investigation suggests that there is a more important reason for the PM’s weight gain: he is now on a different class of drugs, for which ballooning weight is one of the least dangerous side-effects. These drugs are called Mono Amine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs). Before the arrival of Prozac derivatives, they were the first line of attack when dealing with severely depressed patients. But a senior physician told us last month “A GP would have to be insane to prescribe MAOIs these days – SSRIs are safer, with far fewer side-effects. Apart from anything else, it’s almost impossible to get hold of them”. This is indeed correct. In 2003, SKB withdrew their MAOI brand-leader Parnate because of the dangers it represented, and also because SSRIs had none of the disadvantages. However, at the time several regional mental health units reported that for some patients, SSRIs were nowhere near as effective. Thus there is evidence that, having tried and seen no help from the newer generation of drugs, Gordon Brown has now been put onto MAOIs. If this is true, then he is indeed in a desperate state – as we shall explain. This evidence was handed to us inadvertantly. The senior source referred to at the start of this piece mentioned “the latest nonsense – a huge list of things he can’t eat or drink because of the drugs he’s on…most importantly, cheese and Chianti”. Every doctor in Britain would recognise these contraindications instantly: for they are the two great verbotens for people taking MAOI drugs. As long ago as 2001, prescribing psychiatrists described MAOIs as ‘the last resort now we have better drugs’. However, for all their downsides (several thousand people around the world have died as a result of ignoring the dietary advice re MAOIs) this older class of drugs has one huge advantage: for severe depression and obsessive compulsive disorder it remains very effective. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is relatively common. Most of us display some obsessive features in everyday life, but under stress a minority of people become borderline or actual OCD in their behaviour, and need medication to control both this and the depression which almost always presents soon afterwards. The most obvious symptom is a compulsive need to carry out functions such as hand-washing or counting almost incessantly. (The Asperger’s syndrome ‘Rain Man’ personality displays these too, but the two conditions are easily separable on other bases. Our view is that Brown has OCD, not Asperger’s syndrome.) Gordon Brown’s symptoms are obvious when viewed in this light: the constant repetition of phrases, and an almost embarrassing (for his Party) need to spray every Parliamentary answer with statistics. Lifting out of poverty, the Tories are the do-nothing Party, global problems require global solutions – these and myriad others have been repeated over and over ad nauseam. Equally, the six million lifted out of poverty, twelve million helped by mortgage benefits, two million new jobs created: when interrogated, these figures often prove to be illusory, but they – and the constant speech repetition – represent Brown’s unconscious means of controlling the severe anxiety that accompanies depression with OCD. We have no means (as yet) of proving his use of MAOIs, although the ‘long list of forbidden foods’ is the nearest one will get to a smoking gun – short of a written, signed diagnosis or prescription. We also cannot be certain how long the PM has been taking them, but the remark ‘the latest nonsense’ suggests that this is a relatively recent development. On average, a heavy dose of MAOI therapy would start to display some results within twenty days to six weeks. Gordon Brown has reportedly returned from ‘easily his longest break from Downing Street’ feeling ‘very much refreshed and up for it’. It is more than likely he took the uncharacteristically long break on medical advice. And it will be interesting to note whether his behaviour changes. One feature unlikely to change is the increasingly obvious difficulty he has finding his way to and from podiums, and lack of peripheral vision. This (according to a senior, medically-trained source) is the result of failing sight in the one eye he has left. We found so many confirmations of this story from so many sources, it seems to us impossible for it to be pure invention. It appears to be universally recognised in the Cabinet and upper echelons of the Civil Service. So: here we seem to have a man (unless huges cadres of non-colluding senior people are liars) on a rarely used, dangerous drug to control his mental state – and getting close to a stage of serious disablement in relation to his eyesight. As this would clearly make any such person wholly unfit to fulfil the Premiership – especially in the dangerous, broken world we now inhabit – why hasn’t the story broken more widely? Why hasn’t the Opposition leapt on it? In answering this question, we need to delve into the murkier waters of Gordon Brown’s psyche – and the cynical guessing-game that passes for public service in the House of Commons….on all sides. Brown rules by fear and smear. He always has done, and it is the main thing he is known (and hated) for in the Labour Party. A former Cabinet Minister told nby in early 2008 “Nobody ran against Gordon because nobody could face the slur, innuendo and blackmail that would go with it. When he gets going, Brown and his little coterie of spinners are animals”. Several similar observations appeared in national newspapers during late 2007. There has also remained the rumour that even Blair himself eventually fell foul of this, and left not of his own volition but as a result of threats from the Brown camp. That must remain as conjecture: but given his alleged track record of not entirely legal actions, Blair would have had a lot to be frightened about. The PM evokes a certain degree of loyalty from close confidantes, but the main reason why no Brown staffer has broken ranks is that this would mean the end of the meal-ticket: either Brown would fall, or he would deny…and bury the whistle-blower. Luncheon Vouchers are also behind the remaining silence in the Parliamentary Party as a whole. Two senior Lobby correspondents have confirmed to us in the last three weeks that “even the most anti-Brown camp think there’s no alternative to Brown”. Nearly all Labour backbenchers now expect a rout, but think that if Brown were ousted they would be wiped out. Comically, the exact opposite view pertains in the Tory Shadow Cabinet, where “they’re so terrified of Labour dumping Brown, they’d do anything to leave him precisely where he is”. This bears further examination on a number of levels. Three of our sources confirmed the general view that the parlous state of Brown’s health is well-known among Conservative bigwigs. That they collude in an allegedly dangerously ill man remaining in charge of Government (purely to ensure their own victory) is selfish cynicism of the worst kind – and a damning charge to which, if and when the truth of this matter comes to light, they will have no defence. It also reinforces the electorate’s feeling that senior Cameron Tories are woefully lacking in confidence – or convincing alternatives to what the Government is doing. As to whether Brown is a liability or an asset for voters, the latest poll (30.8.09) in the Guardian showed that Brown’s ratings have actually fallen as ’signs’ of economic green shoots have become apparent. In short, when it comes to the Machiavellian ‘keep him where he is’ strategy, New Labour have called it wrong. As ever, they are probably being too clever for their own good. Perhaps more disturbing is the passive political bias (and dereliction of Constitutional duty) represented by the obvious collusion in any cover-up about the Prime Minister’s health problems throughout the senior ranks of the Civil Service. One of the main sources of this story told us, “It’s a farce, and utterly disgraceful. There isn’t a mandarin in Whitehall who’s unaware of Brown’s condition – they tittle-tattle the tale wherever they go, dining out on their inside knowledge, and yet won’t lift a finger to bring it to the public’s attention. We are being let down at every turn by the spineless Establishment running this country”. One can appreciate how a similar situation developed from 1935 onwards in relation to the King’s relationship with Mrs Simpson. But it is hard to understand why the press – especially the right-wing press – haven’t had a harder go at nailing this story in 2009. The tabloids are too busy shouting threats into celeb letter-boxes, and the more liberally inclined papers may well share the New Labour view that loyalty is their duty at this stage of the game; but that seems unlikely – and what of Dacre at The Mail, or the Telegraph, still fresh from its huge success in blowing the lid off the expenses scandal? The answer usually comes back ‘there’s no physical evidence, and it’s an easy story to deny – to dismiss as just another anti-Brown smear campaign’. But perhaps the clues about MAOI usage by the Prime Minister make it much harder to deny….and much easier to get written confirmation. For if it’s true, Brown’s entourage must be sending out strict dietary requirements ahead of his regularly catered public engagements; one could even monitor what he eats on such occasions. Not Born Yesterday lacks both the sources and resources to do this job. The sole purpose of this piece is to get matters to a stage where the story is out in the public domain, such that the real people who count in Britain – the voters – can make their own minds up about it. And – who knows? – to create a situation in which the Opposition might at last do its duty, and question the PM’s fitness for office on these well-known (if not as yet well-documented) bases. SOURCE

PARANOID, SUSPICION, OBSESSIVE SURVEILLANCE AND LIBERTY DESTROYED BY STEALTH

Returning to Britain from a summer holiday abroad, you begin to notice things that perhaps escaped your attention before - the huge number of CCTV cameras that infest our public spaces and, much less obviously, the atmosphere of watchfulness and control that has now become a way of life. This is the regime that 12 years of New Labour have imposed on Britain, a place of unwavering suspicion, paranoia - and obsessive surveillance. We have become the sort of society that we would unhesitatingly have railed against a few years ago. But, because the change has been brought about with such stealth, we are the very last to see it. The latest figures, in a report by the Interception of Communications Commissioner, Sir Paul Kennedy, are truly terrifying. They reveal that a request is made every minute to snoop on someone's phone records or email accounts. Last year alone, there were 504,073 new cases of state-sanctioned surveillance, the equivalent of one adult in 78 being watched - and a rise of 44 per cent over two years. Whatever happened to our centuries- old traditions of freedom? Voltaire called England 'the land of liberty'. Until New Labour materialised, with its intrusive and 'character improving' agenda, that description rang true. The English preferred freedom and tolerance to ideological and religious fanaticism. The currency of our society was common sense. No longer. Common sense has been replaced by officially sanctioned mistrust, mistrust that allows anyone invested with the tiniest bit of authority - often in the form of a high-visibility jacket - to throw their weight around. Britain is now a place where terror laws have been used by councils to spy on people breaching smoking bans. Police routinely stop anyone who photographs a public building, in one instance deleting the pictures taken by a 69-year-old Austrian tourist who admired the architecture of Vauxhall bus station. And if the authorities are behaving like this today, what will they subject us to in the run-up to the 2012 London Olympics? Wardens in Brighton already habitually seize drink from people on the mere suspicion that they plan to consume it in a public place. And in Edinburgh, a swimming pool attendant stopped the 85-year-old mother of TV presenter Nicky Campbell from taking pictures of her grandchildren. These stories have become part of our national life - and there are thousands of them each year. I know this because my researcher trawls local and national newspapers for examples every morning. What they add up to is a depressing account of a nation infantilised by micro-management and fear. We are losing something essential to our national identity. Foreigners who know what is going on here cannot believe that the British show such little regard for their freedoms. Even Americans, the most jumpy people in the world, are unsettled by Britain's paranoia. Government policy is largely to blame. Labour has instilled an endemic culture of suspicion in Britain, which is manifest in the 3,500 new criminal offences brought in over its 12 years in office. Labour is also behind a flurry of new databases that either leech personal information from each one of us or require innocent members of the public to go through an endless rigmarole of proving themselves to the state. The scale of this project is vast. 'The state and its agencies are amassing increasing quantities of data about its citizens,' writes Jill Kirby, the director of the Centre for Policy Studies, in a recent pamphlet. She lists them as including the DNA database, centralised medical records and the children's database Contact-Point. This data, she says, has 'proliferated to levels previously unseen in peacetime Britain'. An institutionalised pessimism has taken over. The clear message of Government is that we are incapable of managing our lives and must be watched and regulated by ministers and civil servants from dawn to dusk. More sinister is the assumption that we are all in some way guilty of harbouring the worst intentions. Up to 11 million people who work with children - music tutors, babysitters, football coaches and even parents who have exchange students to stay - will now have to join a new database at the cost of £64 and undergo criminal checks. Writers such as Philip Pullman and Anthony Horowitz, who regularly visit schools, are among those who have roundly condemned the scheme. You can see why - the other day I heard of a retired canon who was told that he could only baptise his grandson in his local cathedral if the church authorities first saw proof of his criminal records check. But it is the Government's obsession with surveillance that poses the greatest threat to our liberty. Earlier this year, I calculated from published figures that Britain's expenditure on databases and surveillance systems would amount to a staggering £32 billion. Thanks to the economic crisis, some projects have been scaled back. But plans still include a £1 billion system that will give the Government access to data from all emails, text messages, phone calls and internet usage - a proposal that has even been savaged by companies expected to collect the information. Additionally, the e-Borders scheme, which will take 53 pieces of personal information from anyone travelling abroad - including phone and credit card numbers, details of an onward journey and history of cancelled journeys - will cost over £1.2 billion. But the absurd amounts spent on these schemes are not the only concern. The threat they pose to our privacy - and the incompetent way in which the Government handles our personal data - are even more worrying. We know, for example, that more than 30 million separate personal files have been lost by government agencies. Recently, a Freedom of Information request by Computer Weekly magazine revealed that nine local authority staff have been sacked for accessing the personal records of celebrities and acquaintances. This largely unpublicised breach should warn us that a government obsessed with hoarding our information and watching us cannot be trusted to keep our details safely. A similar security lapse in ContactPoint could be disastrous. But even this doesn't compare to the real possibility of the systems that watch our movements, monitor our behaviour and tap into the communications data linking up into one great apparatus of surveillance. This would allow the authorities more or less to monitor our every movement and transaction in real time. Nothing would remain private. If this happens, we can kiss goodbye to a functioning free society in the United Kingdom. We are not there yet - but we can see the seeds everywhere, from the spread of CCTV, and the flood of government regulations to the expropriation of our personal information. We have to consider the distinct possibility that the obituary for the 'land of liberty' is being composed at this very moment. SOURCE

POLITICAL ELECTIONS ARE A SCAM

As in every election we’re now being bombarded with propaganda about how “your vote makes a difference” and associated nonsense. According to the official version ordinary citizens control the state by voting for candidates in elections. The President and other politicians are supposedly servants of “the people” and the government an instrument of the general populace. This version is a myth. It does not matter who is elected because the way the system is set up all elected representatives must do what big business and the state bureaucracy want, not what “the people” want. Elected representatives are figureheads. Politicians’ rhetoric may change depending on who is elected, but they all have to implement the same policies given the same situation. Elections are a scam whose function is to create the illusion that “the people” control the government, not the elite, and to neutralize resistance movements. All voting does is strengthen the state & ruling class, it is not an effective means to change government policy. If a party wins the elections but implements policies that go against the interests of big business then profits will go down and businesses & investors will withdraw their investments. This capital flight will cause the economy to crash. If the ruling party does not change its policies to appease big business then they'll lose the next elections due to the bad economy. In practice most parties change their policies to appease the corporate elite in order to avoid losing power. This is not merely theoretical, it has happened repeatedly. It happened in India a few months ago. The left, lead by the Congress party, won the elections, leading to a coalition government with the Congress party and the Communist party. This caused the stock market to crash because investors feared a change in economic policy that would hurt their profits. Sonia Ghandi, who was originally going to be the next Prime Minister, chose not to take the position and the new government was forced to adopt policies virtually identical to the previous government. Their rhetoric is different, but policy is basically the same. Usually the mere threat of capital flight is enough to keep potentially recalcitrant politicians in line (although most politicians never even consider policies that conflict with the corporate elite/state bureaucracy). For example, Bill Clinton won election on a mildly liberal reformist platform. Once in office he was forced to abandon his campaign promises because if he continued them the bond market wouldn’t react well and the economy would go down the tubes. Clinton’s famous statement to his advisers upon realizing this was, "You mean to tell me that the success of my program and my reelection hinges on the Federal Reserve and a bunch of fucking bond traders?" He was thus forced to abandon his program before it even started, instead implementing one virtually identical to Republican proposals. He complained to his aides: I hope you're all aware we're all Eisenhower Republicans. We're Eisenhower Republicans here, and we are fighting the Reagan Republicans. We stand for lower deficits and free trade and the bond market. Isn't that great? In theory the government might be able to combat this by nationalizing industry but neither the Democrats nor Republicans (or most prominent third parties) are willing to do this. Even if they were, the Supreme Court would strike it down. If some way were found to get around this then the CIA and/or Pentagon would overthrow the government in a coup (or through less dramatic means). The CIA has overthrown many governments for nationalizing industry, or even just implementing policies not sufficiently favorable to US corporations, including Chile, Iran, Guatemala, Brazil, Greece, the Congo and many others. Doing the same on their home turf would be a piece of cake. Once elected representatives are isolated from the general public but surrounded by bureaucrats and other politicians. They therefore have a tendency to see things from the perspective of politicians and bureaucrats, rather than from the perspective of the general public from which they are isolated, and are much more susceptible to pressure from government bureaucracies. Elected representatives’ dependency on the state bureaucracy for information makes them very susceptible to manipulation by the bureaucracies they are officially in charge of. For example, in the late ‘50s the CIA secured approval to launch an uprising in Indonesia by feeding a series of increasingly alarmist reports to their superiors in the National Security Council, who otherwise might have shot the proposed uprising down. This shows how government agencies (especially secretive ones) can pressure politicians and influence policy in preferred directions. This is enhanced by the fact that individual politicians come and go but the bureaucrats are permanent, which makes it easier for bureaucrats to manipulate information and ensures that politicians have less experience with such manipulation. Because the state bureaucracy is permanent while politicians are transitory state bureaucracies tend to accrue more power than elected representatives. State bureaucracies can also manipulate the political process by leaking damaging information about politicians they don’t like or by harassing parties or movements they don’t like (such as COINTELPRO or the recent harassment of anti-war activists by the FBI). This gives an advantage to politicians favorable to the interests of the state bureaucracy. State bureaucracies, especially the military and intelligence services, have a considerable degree of autonomy from elected representatives and so aren’t truly controlled by those representatives. When New Zealand intelligence began secretly participating in Echelon, an international electronic spying system, New Zealand’s Prime Minister didn’t even know about it. Most of the CIA’s covert actions (including coups) were done without Congressional approval and some, like CIA participation in Ghana’s 1966 coup, didn’t even have Presidential approval. Entire wars have been fought in secret, including Russia 1918-1920, Laos 1965-1973 and Cambodia 1970-1975. When Congress cut off funding for the Contras (US-backed terrorists in Nicaragua) in the mid-80s the CIA (and other parts of the state bureaucracy) just kept doing it in secret, disregarding Congress’s wishes. The Pentagon can’t even produce auditable books and regularly “loses” billions of dollars every year. Auditors for the Office of Management and Budget found that “unsubstantiated balance adjustments” for financial year 2000 totaled 1.1 trillion dollars. In other words, elected politicians (and especially congress) have no real control over Pentagon spending. The whole process of Congressional hearings and budgetary oversight is just an elaborate charade - they appropriate money and the Pentagon spends it however it wants to. Plus there’s the “black budget” whose contents are kept secret, allowing the national security establishment to effectively do whatever they want with it. All of this puts many state bureaucracies (especially the military and intelligence services) beyond effective control of elected representatives, let alone the general public. Their secrecy, manipulation of budgets and complexity (there are too many bureaucrats for representatives to effectively keep track of them all) gives government bureaucracies a considerable degree of autonomy. They go off and do whatever they want, either keeping things secret from elected politicians or pressuring them into going along with it. FULL ARTICLE HERE

COINCIDENCE?

GAY MANDY ASKED IF HE WAS GORDON BROWNS WILLY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

MASONS BLAIR AND BROWN DESTROYED OLD LABOUR FOR A NWO VERSION

This gaping hole calls for a new party. Let's call it Labour The party I joined as a gullible student has been dismantled by Blair and Brown, and with it any voice for those on the left I know what this country needs. It needs a Labour party. The old one is not fit for purpose. What finally convinced me was Labour MPs voting on Monday for John Bercow as Speaker. It was a dollop of cynicism on what has surely been the worst parliament of modern times, a tawdry somnolence of sleaze and squandermania, authoritarian in its law-making, reckless in its warmongering and immoral in its self-regulation. Leaders and frontbenchers of both main parties have paid back money filched from taxpayers under a regime that would have prosecuted those taxpayers if they had done the same. This patent admission of guilt left them blandly claiming that they had "done nothing wrong". In that case, why pay it back? Had the house-flipping and tax-dodging been isolated, the culprits would have been drummed from office. Instead, wrongdoing cleansed itself by strength in numbers. Hardly a member of this parliament will depart next year untainted by fiddle or fraud. As a doubtless gullible student, I purchased a Labour party card, gulping at the notorious clause four on its reverse. Even when, disillusioned, I crossed the floor to a similar flirtation with Conservatism, I retained a respect for Labour as custodian of a fine genetic strain in British politics, an ambition for social liberalism, fairness in wealth distribution and ethical dealing in public life. That party was dismantled, ideologically and constitutionally, by Tony Blair and his circle, to prevent it impeding his freedom of action in office, as it had done so many of his predecessors. He wanted no trouble from that quarter. He was right. The exigencies of power led him in directions far removed from the wellsprings of his support. There were reasons for the U-turn on labour law and progressive taxation in the 1990s. There were reasons, albeit weak, for the wars of liberal interventionism. There were reasons, downright bad ones, for passing 14 repressive and illiberal curbs on personal freedom in the name of national security. There were even reasons for accelerating Tory privatisation and for increasing the disparity between rich and poor. There were reasons for responding to the credit crunch by re-enacting the last chapter of Animal Farm on the sofas of Downing Street, with ministers carousing with bankers, lords and ladies until you could not tell them apart. As the money men traipsed through Whitehall protecting their backs and their pockets, the high streets and the factories shut and the job queues lengthened. What has been astonishing is the silence with which the Labour party has received all this. So thoroughly had Blair destroyed Labour as a movement ­independent of its place in power that hardly a peep has been heard from what is supposedly a party of the left. Labour's national executive is a broken reed. There have been no savage motions of censure passed on the conference floor. There has been hardly a resignation from the government or from the party in parliament, whether from conscience or forced on MPs by constituency associations. It took a Tory, David Davis, to resign and fight a byelection over the government's ­detention without trial. In the long years of Tory ascendancy in the 1950s and 60s, Labour produced a welter of self-examination. The writings of Crossman and Crosland, the wars between left and centre-left, were argued out at conference and think-tank, weekend retreat and Trafalgar square rally. Today the interesting debates are within Conservatism, between the "Red Tories" and the neo-Thatcherites running riot through health and education policy. Labour's theoreticians are still twitching under the effects of Blair's anaesthetic, muttering about triangulation and the third way. The chief sign of life, outside such London coteries as Compass and Progress, has come from the old left, gloating over the supposed "demise of capitalism". Who could have predicted that the most coveted ­conference speaker in 2009 would be Eric Hobsbawm? The traditional virtue of British ­politics is its bipolarity, based on the Greek ideal of dialogue, of truth­ ­emerging as a synthesis of opposites. This is embodied in the historical ­separation of two parties and the ­adversarial layout of the houses of parliament and of every broadcasting debate. From Newsnight to Any Questions? there can be just two sides to any argument, left and right, with a Liberal Democrat to supply a chorus. Dialectical politics needs left and right to represent an identifiable coalition of interests and opinions. Those on the left who are against the current wars, the drug laws, an authoritarian Home Office and a centralised state have no voice. Nor do those who want to see bankers taxed and local council housing surge. Parties should in some sense be accountable for their mandate to the electorate. Yet today's party of the left is as rightwing as that of the right. Never in Labour history can the whips have enforced more blatantly anti-labour legislation at the bidding of the executive. I used to assume that one day the Liberal Democrats would find a leader and a cause to seize the political ground on the left opened up by Blair's neo-Thatcherism, as the SDP tried and failed to do on the right. After 2001 and again after 2005 that was clearly a strategic option for the Lib Dems. They emphatically rejected it in electing Nick Clegg as their leader. They were beguiled by the magnetism of the vacuous centre. The new politics fashioned in the mid-90s by Blair and Brown, with the aid of Philip Gould and Peter Mandelson, ­removed the framework by which the Labour party might renew itself from below. The withering of the party apparatus and of its base in the unions and local government left nothing to which future reformers might grasp. Those who now seek to rescue the party and its programme, before the next election or more plausibly after it, have nothing to rescue apart from power itself. Supposed luminaries such as Alan Milburn, Alan Johnson or James Purnell have nowhere to take their ­alternative to Gordon Brown, other than to an ever fickle media. Even the politics of charisma needs somewhere to ground its anchor. Democratic equilibrium needs an opposition, not just one set of careerists or one club pitted against another. It needs an argument and an opposing one. It needs a structure for its debate and a formal relationship between leaders and led. At present it needs a Labour party. Someone should found one. SOURCE

BENEFIT FRAUD A NEW GOVERNMENT DIRECTIVE VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

NEW LABOUR FAILS BRITAIN AGAIN

CORRUPTION RUNS FAR DEEPER THAN FIDDLING MPS' EXPENSES

“Mucking out” British politics Stuart Littlewood argues that the expenses scandal engulfing British Members of Parliament is nothing compared to the fact that supporters of Israel are embedded at all levels in the fabric of British political life and at the heart of the government, including at the core of the security establishment. UK politicians are currently reeling from a public lashing for fiddling their expenses big-time. Such is their arrogance that many, when confronted with their crimes, don't see that they have done anything wrong. The guilty ones who step down will be further enriched with a lavish resettlement allowance and a big pension pot. To appease voters’ anger Parliament and government are now promising anti-sleaze reforms. They are calling on the impressive-sounding Committee on Standards in Public Life to investigate and make recommendations. Conservative leader David Cameron, who has expectations of becoming the next British prime minister, talks of purging his party of its cheats and racketeers. But swindling the taxpayer over MPs' expenses is nothing compared to other corruption that's rife in Westminster. It is said that becoming a Friend of Israel is a necessary stepping-stone to high office. As a result, supporters of that foreign power are embedded at all levels in the fabric of British political life and at the heart of the government. Eighteen months ago a group of concerned academics wrote to the Standards Committee complaining about Israel’s “deep penetration” of our political system and how it prevented Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East affairs, including the Iraq war and the never-ending violations of Palestinian human rights. They asked the committee to consider the activities of the Friends of Israel as a matter for urgent investigation. The chairman, Sir Christopher Kelly, refused. Why? He wouldn't say. But some members of his committee were found to have close links with Friends of Israel. Even this inner sanctum of British correctness and fair play is compromised. Integrity is lacking One of the Seven Principles of Public Life, and perhaps the most important, is integrity – "Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organizations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.” That’s plain enough for even a schoolboy to understand. Yet the authorities turn a blind eye to the various Israel Lobby organizations, which go to great lengths to influence not only those in power, but those wishing to achieve power in the future. Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) claim that, with over 2,000 members and registered supporters, alongside 80 per cent of the Conservative MPs, it has become the largest affiliated group in the party. Its website states that the CFI, in the run-up to the last general election, supported candidates up and down the country. As candidates are now being continuously selected for target seats, CFI has developed a special programme of weekly briefings, events with speakers and a chance to participate in delegations to Israel. CFI encourages all members to help campaign for parliamentary candidates and also for local council, London and European elections. It also “fast-tracks” candidates fighting target marginal seats. Senior Conservatives try to justify the turning of would-be MPs into Zionist stooges by insisting that Israel is “a force for good in the world” and that in the battle for democratic liberal values against repression “Israel's enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together...” A top Conservative Friend of Israel confidently predicted there would be no investigation by the Standards Committee, his cocksure attitude adding to the view that his like are a protected species within the Westminster village. Security and defence are undermined But there are deadly serious consequences. The Israel lobby is even more heavily represented at the centre of Britain's security establishment since the appointment of Kim Howells, formerly minister in charge of Middle East affairs and a one-time chairman of Labour Friends of Israel, to the chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee. This committee has oversight of the Security Service (MI5), the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and the work of the Joint Intelligence Committee and the Intelligence and Security Secretariat, which includes the Assessment Staff in the Cabinet Office. The committee also takes evidence from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS), part of the Ministry of Defence. These people have access to highly classified material. How can we trust them? Another member of the committee is Sir Alan Beith, president of the Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel, whose aims and objectives are stated thus: To maximize support for the State of Israel not only within the Liberal Democrats but within Parliament itself. To influence the party’s Middle East policy. To liaise with Israeli politicians and government. To provide parliamentarians with briefing material for parliamentary debates, questions to ministers and public appearances. To rebut attacks on Israel in the media, Parliament and the party. To arrange and accompany Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel delegations to Israel. To keep in regular contact with the Embassy of Israel. Other pro-Israel groups have similar objectives. British citizens would horrified to know that Zionist tentacles have spread everywhere in Westminster and that our most important security bodies – the Intelligence and Security Committee, Foreign Affairs Committee and Defence Committee – are all chaired by Israel flag-wavers. They inhibit a proper British response on issues such as the cruel and unlawful blockade of Gaza, and more recently the 22 days of lethal terror unleashed by Israel in an attempt to crush the trapped and half-starved men, women and children of the Gaza Strip. Cameron has painted himself into a corner by declaring he’s a Zionist, leaving one to wonder if he actually knows the meaning of the word and all the nastiness it implies. His ideas about the situation in the Middle East seem confused. Take this gem: The West has to understand that there isn’t an equivalence between a democratically elected government of Israel, a state of Israel that is a democracy, that’s a member of the United Nations, that has a totally legitimate right to exist and defend itself – there is no equivalence between that and a group like Hamas... Hamas was democratically elected in 2006. Why not acknowledge and respect that? Israel, of course, is no Western-style democracy but a racist ethnocracy. It flouts dozens of UN resolutions and defies international law. Its every act is designed to make the illegal occupation permanent and realize the Zionist dream of a “Greater Israel” at the expense of world peace. The Israeli cabinet has just approved a draft law to ban Palestinians from marking the Naqba – the "catastrophe" of 1948 widely regarded as the Palestinians’ holocaust, when the state of Israel was declared and some 700,000 were subjected to an Israeli campaign of terror and ethnic cleansing, and subsequently lost their homes and lands, including the land on which the much-mentioned town of Sderot was later built. To this day, they and their descendants, an estimated 4.5 million, have been denied the right to return to their homes. And the Israeli gestapo this week closed down the Palestine Festival of Literature, sponsored by the British Council. Does any of this sound like the work of a democratic government, Mr Cameron? Do you seriously think your party is fit to govern if it aligns with an apartheid regime that has no regard for the rights of others or for the sanctity of human life, and uses depleted uranium and white phosphorus bombs against civilians in densely populated areas? Did you and your colleagues learn nothing from Gaza 2009? And how does it look, standing shoulder to shoulder with religious fanatics who horribly persecute the Christian communities in the Holy Land? Why do you condemn Palestinian resistance when Israelis are killing Palestinians at the rate of nearly 12 to 1? Why insist that they “recognize” Israel while Israel’s boot is on their necks? Prime Minister Gordon Brown's conduct is equally odd. Brown, like Blair before him, also seems indifferent to the 90 years of British betrayal and the Palestinians’ present plight. He was "delighted" when invited to become a patron of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in the UK. Set up to help establish a Jews-only state in Arab Palestine, the JNF is a principal tool for Israel's programme of land theft. The JNF’s constitution requires it to benefit Jews exclusively; therefore, it promotes and implements policies that discriminate against the Arab population of Israel. The JNF stands accused of ethnic cleansing, the destruction of hundreds of Palestinian villages and the expropriation of Palestinian land on a massive scale – war crimes in anyone’s language. And yet – can you believe it – Cameron too has become a patron. It is not enough for party leaders to sack a few scoundrels, reduce a few perks and claim to have cleaned up the system. There’s a mountain of mucking out to do before the British parliamentary system can call itself “fit for purpose”. Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit http://www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk SOURCE Obama ‘Czars’ - A Zionist Shadow Government

END OF NATIONS - E.U. TAKEOVER AND THE LISBON TREATY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

NAKED PICNIC AT CORRUPT TORY TOFFS VAST PUBLICLY FUNDED GARDENS VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE Anthony Steen 'to step down' as MP over fraudulent expenses claims

MORONATOMIC GOVERNMENTIUM VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

EVIL PURNELL AXEMAN TO THE POOR GETS AXED AND KNIFES BROWN

James Purnell knifes Gordon Brown Gordon Brown was dealt a potentially fatal blow on Thursday night as James Purnell dramatically quit the Cabinet and called on the Prime Minister to resign to save Labour from an inevitable general election defeat. In a devastating resignation letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary told Mr Brown to stand aside to give Labour “a fighting chance”. His departure followed those of fellow Cabinet ministers Jacqui Smith and Hazel Blears this week and left Mr Brown’s premiership hanging by the thinnest of threads. It opened the floodgates to other MPs openly demanding the Prime Minister’s resignation. With Labour braced for its worst performance at the polls in a generation in the local and European elections, the Prime Minister's position could soon be untenable. Mr Purnell, 39, told The Daily Telegraph his move was not “a plot” and that he had not told other Cabinet ministers of his intention. The Telegraph understands that Mr Purnell was canvassed for the job of Schools Secretary in the coming reshuffle and indicated he would be interested, to maintain his cover. It is the strongest hint yet that Mr Brown plans to replace Alistair Darling at the Treasury with Ed Balls. FULL ARTICLE HERE James Purnell - the 'sideburned schmoozer' who milked his expenses PURNELLS RESIGNATION LETTER

EVIL HATCHET FACE JACKBOOT SMITH FINALLY GETS THE BOOT

Evil crook hatchet face Jackboot Smith disastrous home secretary finally gets the boot Jacqui Smith is expected to stand down as home secretary in a reshuffle, Whitehall sources have told the BBC. Prime Minister Gordon Brown is expected to reshuffle his cabinet after Thursday's elections. Ms Smith has been criticised for listing her sister's London house as her main home for expenses - and her husband's claim for an adult movie. It is understood she does not intend to quit as an MP and plans to defend her Redditch seat at the general election. Mr Brown confirmed to the BBC he is planning a reshuffle but refused to be drawn on individual ministers' roles. It has been reported that Ms Smith, 46, told him two months ago that she wanted to step down as home secretary. Her expenses claims were revealed weeks before the Daily Telegraph began its series of stories about MPs' claims based on leaked receipts. She agreed to pay back allowances claimed for pay-per-view television services, which included two adult films apparently watched by her husband. She had also been under pressure over other issues including the decision to ask police to investigate Home Office leaks - which resulted in the arrest of Tory frontbencher Damian Green. SOURCE

SOLITARY PROTESTOR OVER MP'S EXPENSES AT WESTMONSTER TODAY 1 JUNE 09
The depth of corruption at Westmonster(No spelling error) Condescending and crooked Darling on last legs Brown fights back on TV over his ministers criminality If this charter for corruption is the answer, MPs are asking themselves the wrong question Is Brown taking us for fools? MPs' expenses: The taxman doesn't like collusion – what will he make of MPs' identical explanations?

THE DEPTH OF CORRUPTION AT WESTMONSTER(NO SPELLING ERROR)

Tales of tax evasion and phantom mortgages conceal a more profound venality in our political monoculture The theft of public money by members of parliament, including government ministers, has given Britons a rare glimpse inside the tent of power and privilege. It is rare because not one political reporter or commentator, those who fill tombstones of column inches and dominate broadcast journalism, revealed a shred of this scandal. It was left to a public relations man to sell the “leak”. Why? The answer lies in a deeper corruption, which tales of tax evasion and phantom mortgages touch upon but also conceal. Since Margaret Thatcher, British parliamentary democracy has been progressively destroyed as the two main parties have converged into a single-ideology business state, each with almost identical social, economic and foreign policies. This “project” was completed by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, inspired by the political monoculture of the United States. That so many Labour and Tory politicians are now revealed as personally crooked is no more than a metaphor for the anti-democratic system they have forged together. Their accomplices have been those Westminster journalists and their editors, who have “played the game” wilfully, and have deluded the public (and sometimes themselves) that vital, democratic differences exist between the parties. Media-designed opinion polls based on absurdly small samplings, along with a tsunami of comment on personalities and their specious crises, have reduced the “national conversation” to a series of media events, in which the withdrawal of popular consent – as the historically low electoral turnouts under Blair demonstrated – has been abused as apathy. FULL ARTICLE HERE

MP'S EXPENSES SCAM MOST POPULAR EXCUSES VIDEO

TORY TOFF CAMERON AND HOW TO HOLD AN OPEN MEETING IN PRIVATE

What follows is an expanded version of an account I wrote (for the Mail on Sunday of 24th May) of David Cameron's supposed open meeting with the voters on the subject of the Commons scandal. I don't live in Mr Cameron's constituency, but I do live close enough to it to have bicycled to his Friday meeting in Witney, which is being portrayed, in my view misleadingly, as David Cameron braving the people on the subject of MPs' expenses. Here's the article: ‘You might think that David Cameron had subjected himself to the wrath of the voters on Friday and come away unscathed. Reports and pictures have appeared of Mr Cameron facing an allegedly open meeting in the Witney Corn Exchange. The Leader of the Opposition - unlike Andrew MacKay - escaped without any angry heckling. This is despite the fact that Mr Cameron is far from being in the clear. He admits to having wrongly claimed £680 to clear wisteria from the chimney of his spacious country home. And he got us taxpayers to pay the interest (£1,700 a month for most of the last eight years) on his £350,000 mortgage, a mortgage he may not actually need. But why spend your own money when the public will pay for you to have an interest-free loan? Well, I was there and I can tell you how Mr Cameron managed to get such a smooth ride. First of all, the meeting was at noon on a Friday, a time when most people with jobs haven't time to go to meetings. Second, the local Tories did what they could to hold a supposedly public occasion in private. I only knew of it because of a brief mention of it in my local paper, the 'Oxford Mail'. The website of Witney Conservatives seems to be frozen in time, and doesn't deal with any of Mr Cameron's engagements since 24th April. When I turned up on the doorstep, it was guarded by various apparatchiks sitting at desks with lists, and making it look as if it was in some way a members-only function. An inexperienced person, new to politics, might easily have been put off. The aides gulped visibly when they saw me, but had more sense than to try to keep me out. A freelance TV truck was parked outside, but nothing from Sky or the BBC. When, I wonder, were the big broadcasters informed of the event? And who decided which clips of the occasion they saw? Mr Cameron had a mike clipped to his tie, so anything he said could be recorded, but questioners were not offered a microphone and any heckling or hostility - had it happened - would have been indistinct on videotape. Once the meeting started, it was clear that the local loyalists had been summoned to fill most of the 200 seats. The average age was well over 50. Mr Cameron recognised almost every questioner by name, and most of them addressed him familiarly as ‘David’. Every trick in the Tony Blair Fake Sincerity Handbook was used. There was no lectern, so Mr Cameron looked defenceless and vulnerable. He took off his jacket as soon as questions began, and he deployed his (absent) wife as a human shield when awkward questions - about how rich they are - came up. Do we have a £30 million fortune? Chuckle. Samantha must have spent it all, ha ha. No specific answer, though. Apart from me, the only seriously troublesome questioner was a lone Liberal Democrat. And after Mr Cameron eventually allowed me to ask my question (which he didn't answer), the final say was given to a fervent Cameron fan, who decried any suggestions that Mr Cameron had done anything wrong. The Tory leader knew he was safe. He was so sure he was among friends that he used a rude word beginning with 'a', and offered, rashly to work for half the pay. If Mr Cameron really wants to find out what the people of West Oxfordshire think about him, his mortgage and his chimney, I suggest he hires a bigger hall, advertises the event both to local people and the national media, and holds it when normal men and women won't be at work.’ And here are some extracts from what he said, with my thoughts on them. I can't provide a complete transcript and don't claim this is one. But I have selected some parts which I think were specially interesting. He insisted he needed two homes, even though he admitted it was possible to commute the distance (many in his constituency do, and it is about 75 miles each way). He said that his children were educated in London (which is true) and that Parliament still sits late on Monday or Tuesday night. Well, yes, but I would say that a constituency home is a convenience rather than an absolute necessity. If his children are at school in London, then he will in any case be in London on Monday or Tuesday, the only days when the Commons usually sits late. He only really needs to be in his constituency all day on Fridays and perhaps Saturdays - a need that could be met, in my view, by a comfortable bed and breakfast or at most a small house or flat. I am still unconvinced by the idea that MPs with seats outside London need two homes as a matter of course. Members with remote constituencies obviously need a toehold in London, an expensive place to live. MPs with seats in or very close to London obviously don't need two homes at all. I do wonder, if Mr Cameron sat for a less picturesque part of the country (and west Oxfordshire is delightful), around the same distance from Notting Hill, whether he would be so keen to have a weekend home there, and take his family there so often. I've put in the occasional 'er' or 'erm' where I think it adds to the account, ie in showing hesitation, but not all of them. And I've also mentioned audience laughter, to illustrate the general sympathy of the curiously assembled audience with Mr Cameron, which I believe is explained above. I've also inserted some commentary of my own. Mr Cameron explained his rules: ‘What I claim for, I always tried to ask myself 'What is it reasonable to claim for ... not what the rules say, but what is reasonable?’ He then set out what he regarded as reasonable. ’From 2001 to 2007 the only thing I really claimed for in respect of my second home was the interest on a mortgage, not the repayments but the interest. It was a very large mortgage, it was £350,000 worth of mortgage, it was about £1,700 a month that I was claiming. That was quite close to the maximum you could claim at the time but I did not at that stage claim for anything else...’ My comment: To me, £350,000 seems to be a colossal mortgage, especially for someone on a Parliamentary salary, as he was when he first took it on, or even the Leader of the Opposition's salary, which he is now drawing. We do not know whether this sum paid in full for the Camerons' country home. I would suspect that it probably didn't, since large properties in pleasant Oxfordshire villages generally went, even eight years ago, for rather more than that. Several questions arise. Could he have paid for the property out of his own resources? Did he need such a large house? Did he, before the current scandal, assume that he was bound to benefit in the long term from the likely increase in the price of the house during what promised to be a long political career? Now, of course, this is ruled out, but was it then? And £1,700 a month, tax free, is a lot of money, more than the total that comes into quite a few households. How urgent would the need be to justify this? Mr Cameron continued: ’....In 2007 I was able to pay down the mortgage a little bit, so it was a £250,000 mortgage, paying about £1,000 in mortgage interest every month, and so I also claimed for what I would call some pretty straightforward household bills, council tax, oil, gas, erm, and other utility type bills and insurance on the property. And that has been the case from the beginning of 2007 right through to now. I now claim less than the maximum allowed, I don't claim all of those utility bills, I claim a percentage of them, because I think that's right and fair.’ My comment: He 'paid down' the mortgage' a 'little bit'. That 'little bit' turns out to be £100,000, once again a very large sum by most people's standards. And also, if you choose to run a second home, shouldn't you accept that it's up to you to insure it, pay the fuel bills and council tax on it? And wouldn't it be prudent to choose such a home on the basis that you would want to keep such bills low, rather than expect others to defray them? ‘But I have claimed one bill that I thought was questionable, and so I decided to pay it back. This is the infamous wisteria bill (laughter) as it will now always be known. It was actually a maintenance bill. It was a bill for £680 and it was a bill I claimed at the time because I judged it was about maintenance not about decoration or improvement. It was to mend a leaky roof, it was to put some outside lights on the property for security and mend some ones that were broken and it was to remove this infamous wisteria which was nothing to do with pruning a plant. It was because I have a chimney with a fan on it to get the smoke out so I can light a fire. It had stopped working and the wisteria needed to be removed from it. I claimed for that bill because I thought it was maintenance not decoration but I think MPs have got to show a lead and have got to show some responsibility and have got to take any bill that is frankly questionable or borderline and pay it back. So that is what I am going to do. I am not aware of any other bill for my second home that is inappropriate or should be paid back but were one to emerge in this great process I will happily do that.‘ My comment: It is not clear from this whether Mr Cameron really thinks he ought to have paid back the wisteria money. It sounds to me as if he thinks he was justified in claiming it but announced he would pay it back for the sake of appearances. Otherwise, why the long, long justification? Why should we worry about whether he can light a fire or not? He gave a long explanation in defence of MPs' office expenses, and promised to look through his office expenses in case there were any questionable payments, which he promised to pay back. He made it clear that he had done no 'flipping', switching the designation of his 'second home' so as to maximise claims. And he added: ‘I always try to ask what is reasonable to claim, not what can you claim. I have never claimed for cleaners, gardeners, furniture, food, decorations, duck houses (laughter), moats (laughter), swimming pools or anything like that. I am not putting up my hand and saying I am whiter than white - that didn't get Tony Blair anywhere (laughter) or saying I am better than anybody else but it's just a judgement I took that there were sensible things to claim - that I did claim even though I am relatively well off because the claim was there if you needed to maintain a second home - and I think to do my job properly I need to maintain a second home.’ My comment: How do these rules apply? If this is right for him, what about other MPs, especially Tory frontbenchers, who have claimed for some or all of the things above? Should they go, without exception? If not, what does it mean that Mr Cameron thinks it is wrong to claim these things? Also, his statement that he is ‘relatively well off’ raises the question of how well off he is. He has brushed aside the suggestion, made by the wealth expert Philip Beresford, that Mr and Mrs Cameron together are worth £30 million, and said it was untrue on the Andrew Marr programme. Very well then. I think he's entitled to reasonable privacy on this, and doesn't have to reveal the exact contents of his bank accounts. But can someone please put to him the question in a public place: ’Could you have afforded to pay for your Oxfordshire home yourself?’ Listening to my tape of the Question and Answer session I notice that almost all the questions are general, addressed to Mr Cameron as Opposition Leader or political pundit, not as an individual MP who might himself have gone too far in living on the public payroll. That's not surprising, if my analysis above is right. I've also begun to notice that Mr Cameron now makes much of the fact that Parliament has lost much of its power to ‘Europe’ and the Judges. He speaks as if he plans to correct this. But he knows perfectly well that unless Britain leaves the EU, most of our legislation will be imposed on us by the European Commission. So this seems to me to be just talk. A small digression here. Vikki Boynton posted last week that the Tory position on Lisbon is: ’If the Lisbon Treaty is not yet in force at the time of the next general election, and a Conservative Government is elected, we would put the Treaty to a referendum of the British people, recommending a 'no' vote. If the British people rejected the Treaty, we would withdraw Britain's ratification of it.’ Seems clear.‘ Yes, it does *seem* clear. It is meant to seem clear. But it is not. A British withdrawal of ratification would be followed by immense pressure from the EU to change that position. There is a great appetite in Brussels to get on with ratification. How would a Cameron government respond to that pressure? I believe it would 'negotiate' a 'compromise' that would end with Lisbon coming into force more or less as it is. That is the key question, and one you won't get an answer to. Only a government which clearly wished to leave the EU could possibly escape from this bind. One other small point about Mr Cameron's performance. At one stage he spoke repeatedly about how many peers (or rather how few) he had 'created'. So far as I know, it is the Queen who creates political peers, on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Leader of the Opposition, by convention, may usually suggest names, but (as happened to William Hague over one controversial nomination) the Prime Minister may decline to take his advice. It passed me by at the time, numbed as I was by the general sycophancy, but the person sitting next to me (a distinguished commentator who shall remain nameless) pointed it out and I thought I would share it with you. SOURCE

HOW POLITICS DRIVES AN AGENDA

When it comes to tricking the people, British (two party) democracy is one clever system; which is precisely what we would expect when we consider how long it has been around for. Do you know what is so clever about it? It pretends to pit one side against the other when really it exists solely to ensure the perpetuation of both for as long as the agenda needs them. The only way ‘democracy’ can survive in its British format is to have two apparently opposing sides; the remainder of the parties just ‘making up the numbers’. Here is a little known fact: It matters not which side is actually in power; the party in ‘opposition’ dictates government decision-making, and vice versa. But the decisions made always serve the agenda, the ultimate goal of which is world government (which has nothing to do with Britain per se). So we can conclude that the Conservatives and Labour are on the same side. If we look at the current situation, we see Labour is nearing the end of its governmental reign. This being so, whatever the Tories say happens to have more credence in the political arena. As we are about to find out, the Tories can even criticise Labour policy (based on a lie) and make it look as if it only goes halfway towards dealing with the ‘problem’ (a lie in the first place). When it comes to tricking the people, British democracy is one clever system. From the BBC website UK ‘at risk of sea-borne attack’ Britain is vulnerable to terrorist attack from the sea because no single body is responsible for protecting the UK’s coast, MPs have warned. The only terrorist attacks are those planned by the people who already know what measures they will then impose on the people under the guise of dealing with the ‘terrorists’. Just nine Royal Navy ships along with a “motley collection” of police and coastguard boats guard a shoreline more than 7,000 miles long. And? What evidence is there of an impending terrorist attack? There is none! ‘Terrorism’ has become a term as generic as it is meaningless. Of course, there is nothing meaningless about Terrorism as far as pushing the agenda on is concerned. And the agenda is always very concerned! Very serious! (You are not supposed to laugh at the agenda - that makes it very angry). The Commons defence committee suggests developing a “deterrent capability” to ward off sea-borne attacks. What evidence is there of the remotest possibility of a sea-borne attack? The Ministry of Defence has insisted clear procedures are in place. Ah! Here’s the necessary counterweight to the argument put forward by the Commons defence committee. The argument needs ‘opposition’ to give it the right to exist, just as the Tories and Labour need each other to prevent their otherwise inevitable collapse. Concerns over the UK’s preparations for dealing with a maritime terrorist threat were raised by the committee. A ‘maritime terrorist threat’. Readers, are you worried? Are you laughing? Reactive forces Its statement said: “We are concerned at the level of action being taken to address threats to aspects of national infrastructure such as ports. What are you basing your concerns on? “What assets are available for maritime security tend to be reactive forces.” What are you basing your concerns on? The statement continued: “There is a strong case for developing a deterrent capability in relation to threats to civilian maritime targets. There is no ’strong case’, so what are you basing your concerns on? “We are not satisfied that an intelligence-led approach is sufficient.” What are you basing your concerns on? At present the Royal Navy has six warships, two patrol vessels and a support tanker protecting UK waters. They are backed up by 120 police boats, five coastguard patrol boats and five UK Border Agency vessels. But the Conservatives have called for a full review of the defensive capability. The Conservatives! Here, this party - soon to take the reigns of government - is making it clear the British people are only going to get more-of-the-same government they already despise. More of the same means a continuation and extension of the agenda’s illusory grip of control. It’s a downward spiral, based on a FEAR FACTOR to stop people from expressing themselves. Fear makes people contract inwards, becoming ever more dependent, rather than expanding with creative thought. Indeed, fear can shut down the independent thought process altogether. That the Tories are able to get away with suggesting a full review of Britain’s ‘defensive capability’ (they are saying more control is necessary) shows how the system of politics, although it is gradually being manipulated into breaking itself apart, remains almost as effective as ever with regards to achieving its aims. They say the November 2008 Mumbai attacks - during which gunmen arriving by boat killed more than 170 people - could be replicated in the UK. Ah, now we know what they are basing their concerns on! Those attacks were an inside job and they will never be replicated in the UK. The point is not to replicate them but to use them as the Problem which creates the Reaction (from the public) which leads to the Solution put forward by politicians. It takes time to plan these attacks, and each time the risks of exposure are greater, so the elite want to keep terrorist incidents to a minimum - as long as they achieve their purpose: to push on the agenda. Whoever or whatever manipulates our reality totally lacks any sort of empathy. Lack of clarity Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said: “It is clear from this report the government has not given sufficient attention to the role of the armed forces in its domestic security policy. Liam Fox will soon be stepping into the limelight alongside his boss David Cameron. Public relations man Cameron will be crowned Prime Minister and Fox will become Defence (War on the People) Secretary. “The lack of clarity about the role of the MoD in terms of maritime security needs to be addressed. Politicians are oh-so-good at addressing. They are absolutely useless at encouraging happiness in their citizens. “This is why we need a Strategic Defence Review to identify the roles the armed forces will be needed for.” So to the nitty gritty. The Strategic Defence Review he is talking about has a hidden purpose behind it. It is the excuse which will be used to tighten the grip of the military over its own people. The committee also called for the role of the Army during natural emergencies such as floods to be clarified and the Territorial Army to be used more regularly. This is nothing new. We already have the templates of Communism and Nazism to show us the effects of military rule. But an MoD spokesman said: “There are clear procedures in place for the armed forces to provide military assistance to other government departments both in times of national crises. Although it stops short of saying it is helping to maneuver absolute military rule into existence, this is the bit where the current regime tells us what a fine job it is already doing on that front. “How dare the opposition suggest we are not doing well enough!” On and on goes the charade. Orwellian Translation Unit says: “in times of national crises” = national crises are coming. “Work is under way to provide other government departments with guidelines on how to request military assistance in areas such as counter terrorism. Of course it is! “We regularly take part in counter terrorism exercises.” Of course you do! JP, I aim to expose the truth. Please wake up! SOURCE

REVOLUTION IN THE AIR

The anger in the air is palpable. The ordinary people hold the political class in contempt. The government is failing, as war and economic catastrophe are dealt with in increasingly unconvincing fashion by second-rate public servants. There is, for the first time in a generation, a sense of revolution brewing. This is not today's Britain. It is England in 1381, the year that witnessed one of the greatest popular risings in our history: the Peasants' Revolt. Lessons of the Peasants' revolt Between May and November that year, England was seized by spasms of popular rebellion, provoked by poll taxes and a disastrous war, and underpinned by the common belief that the government was a pack of scoundrels. Towns and villages from Somerset to Scarborough rose against their rulers, beating and sometimes killing MPs, lawyers, landowners and politicians, tearing down their homes and vandalising their land. Bloody revenge At the heart of the rising was a march on London on Corpus Christi weekend (Thursday 13 to Saturday 15 June). Traditionally this was a time of mystery plays and festive processions. In 1381, the main procession consisted of villagers from the Thames estuary marching along the pilgrim road between Canterbury and London, burning houses and taking political prisoners as they protested against their venal, incompetent masters. The peasant's revolt ransacked London before it was put down When the protestors, led by their general Wat Tyler and the maverick preacher John Ball, reached London, they found they had significant common cause with the townsmen. The London populace bore long-held grudges towards their own ruling elites - which included the oligarchic, super-rich merchant traders in the City as well as the hapless courtiers who governed in the name of 14-year old King Richard. Common fury with the state of lordship bound rural and urban rebels in a compact to clean up government. So the town mice opened their gates to the country mice, and together they all set about the cats. At first there were organised protests, attacks on specific, symbolic landmarks: the Savoy Palace, home of the powerful and unpopular duke of Lancaster, was burned to the ground; the Temple, home of the legal profession, was sacked. Prisons were broken open and the Tower of London, where the government had holed up, was besieged. Demonstrations became riots. A chopping block was set up at Cheapside, where the street ran sticky with the blood of the condemned. Kind Richard II was only 14 years old when faced with the rebellion The Archbishop of Canterbury had his head hacked off on Tower Hill. The Treasurer was murdered, as - in Suffolk - was a Chief Justice. Some 140 Flemish merchants and their families were butchered on the banks of the Thames, in a shocking xenophobic massacre. But for the luck of the young king, Richard II, and the fortitude of a few good men around him led by Mayor of London, William Walworth, the City would have been burned to the ground. Tyler and his mob were eventually defeated at Smithfield, but it took nearly six months to calm the rest of the country. Political revolt The summer of discontent left a profound mark on the English political consciousness. A few lines written, prior to the rebellion, by the Kentish poet John Gower, were suddenly recognised as an important tenet of government. "There are three things of such a sort that they produce merciless destruction when they get the upper hand," he wrote. "One is a flood of water, another is a raging fire and the third is the lesser people, the common multitude; for they will not be stopped by either reason or by discipline." I have thought many times during the past months that our politicians would benefit from revisiting the events of the Peasants' Revolt. In many ways it is a tale of mutual misunderstanding: the ordinary folk thought the worst of their politicians, and politicians saw their people as an economic resource, to be taxed and tormented as the necessities of government demanded. The Black Death was a major factor in fermenting anti-government feeling This government, like the government in 1381, has been caught out by a global crisis of unprecedented severity. In the fourteenth century it was the Black Death, which killed 40% of Europe's population. The government's reaction - to impose labour laws that stifled economic recovery but preserved the social hierarchy, was vastly unpopular, for it prevented ordinary people from improving their lives. Now, it is the collapse in global credit which has brought a different sort of misery to millions. No doubt there are many differences between 1381 and 2009. They were medieval, we are modern. And history never repeats itself as exactly as historians sometimes wish. But if I were an MP today, I would make it my business to learn the course and the lessons of 1381 by heart. Then I would give thanks that there are no longer any chopping blocks at Cheapside. Dan Jones is the author of Summer of Blood. SOURCE

MAKE GOVERNMENT POVERTY HISTORY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MASON COPS INVESTIGATE MASON MP'S DODGY CLAIMS

Here once again we have Britains masonic coppers who for years have been investigating dodgy MP's and let them away with MURDER. We should not hold our breath when MASON cops investigate MASON MP's and then say they "MAY" charge them. Anytime MP's know they have committed something criminal they will use two legal quotes, it was done in "GOOD FAITH " or it was an "HONEST MISTAKE". We can't see the local neds getting away with their crimes using GOOD FAITH or HONEST MISTAKE or even giving back goods they have stolen when they go before British judges. CPS may charge MPs with fraud A probe by Scotland Yard and the Crown Prosecution Service into Commons expenses is expected to centre on the two Labour MPs who claimed money for mortgages they had already paid off. Former Environment Minister Elliot Morley and David Chaytor have both been suspended by the party and face being de-selected by their constituency parties. A panel formed by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer will meet on Monday to decide whether MPs should face criminal charges. It could lead to Mr Morley and Mr Chaytor being prosecuted under the 2006 Fraud Act or the 1968 Theft Act. Although the CPS and the Metropolitan Police are independent bodies, they are expected to come under pressure from Downing Street, which has described the 'phantom' mortgage claims as 'a very serious matter'. A statement by the Met and the CPS said Sir Paul Stephenson had instigated meetings with the CPS before the exposure of MPs' expenses in the media 'in relation to a number of allegations made to police'. It added: 'Due to the increase in subsequent allegations, the Commissioner and Director of Public Prosecutions have decided to convene a panel to assess allegations in order to advise on whether criminal investigations should be started.' SOURCE

UK'S BIGGEST SCROUNGER TELLS BROWN SHE IS DEEPLY TROUBLED OVER MP'S EXPENSES

You have to laugh when the biggest scrounger in the UK with her massive wealth and despite what the corporate media say, the wealthiest despot by far across the globe. Then discusses MP's dodgy expenses that PALE next to the multi-billion pound empire she personally owns. While scrounging vast amounts of money from the public purse for the upkeep of her properties, her travel and her security. Also the massive amount of money spent on her entourage and extended families that also place an enormous burden on the public purse. The Queen has told Gordon Brown she is worried that the scandalous revelations about MPs' expenses could damage Parliament. She discussed the explosion of public outrage over the scandal in what is understood to have been a candid exchange of views when she met the Prime Minister for their weekly audience at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday. Details of their conversation - which covered the vital need to restore trust in Parliament - came to light as: The identities of the shadowy figures who leaked the MPs' expenses were revealed. Speaker Michael Martin told friends he is ready to quit. A shock new poll put the anti-EU UKIP on course to overtake Labour in next month's European elections. Public demands for criminal charges against at least five expenses-cheat MPs grew. Labour's overall poll rating fell to yet another all-time historic low - just 20 per cent. A Labour MP was discovered to have claimed £125,000 expenses for a run-down garage via his 'office' expenses. Another Labour MP was suspended for claiming £13,000 for a mortgage that had been paid off. Writing in the News of the World today Gordon Brown said he was 'appalled and angered' by last week's expenses revelations. He also apologised, on behalf of all parties, to those ‘striving hard in these difficult times’ that the political system had let them and the public down. The Prime Minister said he was brought up to believe ‘you did the right thing – and that trust, integrity and honesty are the most precious assets of all.’ He also said: ‘I want to assure every citizen of my commitment to a complete clean-up of the system. Wherever and whenever immediate disciplinary action is required I will take it. ‘The bottom line is that any MP who is found to have defied the rules will not be serving in my government.’ Gordon Brown said Westminster could not operate like a ‘gentleman’s club’ where MPs or parties alone decide whether tax payers money should be paid back. Neither Buckingham Palace nor Downing Street would comment on the conversation between Mr Brown and the Queen, insisting that it remain confidential. However, well-placed sources say the Queen is 'deeply troubled' by the scandal and had made it clear that she feared it could inflict 'long-lasting damage' to the Commons. 'She won't discuss individual MPs but she feels this scandal has done a lot of long-lasting damage,' said the source. 'She is aware the public feel repulsed by this sort of thing. She is conscious there is a recession on.' An entirely separate source told The Mail on Sunday that the Queen had expressed her 'disappointment' at the expenses disclosures. Both insiders stressed that Her Majesty's comments were neither politically partisan nor aimed at any particular MPs, but came out of concern for the standing of Parliament. Gordon Brown called for ‘transparency to the public’ in his News of the World column today sighting it as the ‘foundation of properly policing this system.’ Looking to the future the Prime minster wrote there was a need for ‘even more fundamental change.’ He said: ‘I have asked Parliament to ensure – and MPs have agreed – that outer London MPs cannot claim a second home allowance.’ He also admitted that the revelations of the past week would have a ‘lasting impact on our politics.’ Some observers have compared the backlash against MPs with the anger directed at the Queen in the aftermath of Princess Diana's death. The future of the Monarchy as an institution appeared briefly in jeopardy after the Royal Family's initial low-key response prompted unprecedented hostility towards the Queen. On that occasion, Mr Brown's predecessor Tony Blair played a key role in advising the Queen on how to react to public opinion. This week, amid a similar volatile and rebellious public mood, it appears to have been the Queen's turn to counsel the Government, advising Mr Brown on his own efforts to guide Parliament through the expenses crisis that threatens its entire future. The Prime Minister's spokesman refused to comment on their meeting, saying: 'Their discussions are private and we have no comment.' A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman stuck to the same strict official line, saying: 'We never comment on what is said between the Queen and the Prime Minister during their private audiences. The Queen and the Prime Minister were alone. No one ever discusses what they discussed.' Tory MP Nicholas Soames, a friend of Prince Charles, said: 'This business has done grave damage to the standing of Parliament and it will take a long time for it to recover trust and confidence. You can smell the stench of death about this Government. 'Parliament is paralysed, the whole place has effectively closed down when there are dangerous issues that this country must deal with, whether it is Afghanistan, Al Qaeda or the Middle East peace process. 'The expenses system must be reformed but we must not become obsessed with it, Parliament has important work to do.' A BPIX poll for The Mail on Sunday emphasises the strength of public anger over MPs who abuse their expenses. If voters had their way, five politicians - ex-Minister Elliot Morley, Tory MP Andrew Mackay, Employment Minister Tony McNulty, Transport Minister Geoff Hoon and Communities Secretary Hazel Blears - would face criminal charges. The Queen has had good relations with all 11 occupants of Downing Street since she came to the throne in 1952. Most came to value her vast experience of State affairs. Apart from death of Diana, the closest to a constitutional clash between Buckingham Palace and No10 came during the Thatcher years, when it was reported that the Queen expressed sympathy for striking miners and fears that Mrs Thatcher's policies were fuelling social unrest. Although the Queen's role in Parliament is now largely ceremonial, it is the Monarch who dissolves Parliament, and it is only convention that dictates that she should do so only on the advice of the Prime Minister. She also retains a key role in the passage of legislation. The Crown is expected to act with 'the advice and consent' of the Commons and Lords, but again, it is only convention which states that she will give Royal assent to Bills passed by the two Houses. SOURCE Queens own family have their hands deeper in the taxpayers' pockets than any MP

MP'S EXPENSES AND THE CONTINUED THREAT TO UK DEMOCRACY

If you view the recent events of how suddenly the corporate media have been exposing MP's dodgy expenses claims as a type of Problem, Reaction, Solution you can see the scenario at how at the next election voters can be swayed and may refuse to vote for the UK's political mafia. The corporate media at election time ONLY support the major political parties that are ALL controlled and funded by masons. They know Thatcher did so much damage to the Tories that voters wouldn't dare try and return them . The British people do not have ANY viable political parties who aren't up to their neck in corruption to vote for. Despite all of this, the corporate media still give platforms to them time and again providing the facade that they are the only parties WORTHY of our vote. So the question is how do they get the Tory's back into power? Simply use the expenses scams to undermine the lot of them, even though they are the only visible political parties that continue to get the media platforms that ensure any other minority party has no chance when the vast bulk of political comment remains with the major parties and their sleaze. Who will that ultimately assist? Well logically if less people vote, for the obvious reasons explained above, the TORIES will be the only party that will have an increased percentage of votes as those who vote tory are all part of the same toffs club and up to their necks in sleaze themselves FLEECING their way into their mansions and vast wealth. Tories voters are NOT put off by tory sleaze as it is that very sleaze that mirrors their own rise to wealth in a nation that creates a system were the more EVIL you act the more financially better off you become thanks to being part of the MASONIC clubs of the UK. Most of the toff millionaire and billionaires assets are protected by masonic judges in courts that ensure the ordinary public get fleeced while the establishment are protected using masonic judges ,hence the vast inequality between rich and poor. The corporate media are doing the tory voters a big favour by ensuring more voters wont vote in protest at these fraudulent claims which will ensure another TORY government and is just the same type of manipulation the toff and masonic owned and controlled corporate media have been doing for centuries. They continually report the UK is a democracy while they control who gets the advertising platforms for the voters to decide on. NO OTHER political party has a hope in hell of breaking this corrupt cycle while the corporate media concentrate all their attention on the hooks and crooks that masquerade in Westminster as some sort of greater good instead of the shower of evil fraudsters that have deceived UK citizens for far to long. There is METHOD IN THEIR MADNESS from a corporate media who ensure DEMOCRACY is a facade that the editors and owners manipulate to get into power who they want, not who the voters want , which is an overhaul of the political mafia that has a massive grip over all our lives to the detriment of us all, apart from those rich toffs that this system protects. Why SUDDENLY do the corporate media start attacking all sides at Westminister? Is it to distract attention away from the massive criminality of the judges who are being controlled by Lizzie and HER corrupt and crooked crown? Lives are being destroyed on a grand scale and judicial corruption makes the MP expenses claims pale by comparison. We reckon a multi-billion pound scam is being created everyday in British courts thanks to a complicit crown, its masonic lackey judges , lawyers all part of the bar associations and chief constables conspiring with bailiffs to throw victims of injustice onto the streets of Britain in a scam unparalleled in British history. MORE ON THE POLITICAL MAFIA MORE ON THE LEGAL MAFIA

NOSE IN TROUGH LORD FOULKES CHALLENGES BBC PRESENTER ON SALARY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE FOULKES TOTAL PAYMENT FROM PUBLIC PURSE House of Lords: claimed £54,441 in allowances for 94 days attendance (£579/day) Earns £36,000 as a Parliamentary Consultant to Eversheds LLP for 36 days work (£1000/day) Claimed £3061.17 in allowances from the Scottish Parliament between April 2008 and March 2009 Salary for a Member of the Scottish Parliament £56,671.

WESTMINSTER AN ORGANISED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

The (inter)net is tightening round their crimes and necks. Westminster an organised criminal conspiracy, sack the spivs who let them get away with it - and put thieving MP's on trial Defensive: Harriet Harman tried to justify the expenses claims by saying they were 'within the rules' Ever since Parliament first met beside the Thames more than 700 years ago it has been inspired by one very powerful and wonderful idea: disinterested public service. This meant that people would seek to become MPs or government ministers not out of self-interest and personal greed, but because they wanted to serve the nation. The key reward was never financial. Rather, it was measured in terms of honour. This admirable motive drove all the greatest parliamentarians in our history: Oliver Cromwell, William Pitt the Elder, Gladstone and Winston Churchill. These men were respected for their self-sacrifice and exceptionally high standards of ethics. This noble idea, which has driven our public life for so many centuries and, in many ways, has held Britain together as a country, died yesterday. Nobody can say any longer that our politicians are motivated by honesty, duty or patriotism. Almost to a man and woman they have been exposed as cheats and crooks whose primary motivation is lining their own pockets rather than serving Britain. As a result, Parliament itself no longer looks like our greatest national institution. Instead, it has been exposed as an organised criminal conspiracy whose primary purpose is to defraud the taxpayer and serve the vested interest of a venal political class. This corruption does not just involve a few bad apples, as Parliament's defenders so often like to assert. The shocking truth is that, with a handful of gleaming exceptions, almost all ministers and MPs are caught up in it including the Prime Minister, the Chancellor, the Home Secretary and the Speaker of the House of Commons. Gone are those values of decency and integrity, to be replaced by a squalid system of institutionalised corruption and private self-enrichment. It is no exaggeration to say that this is a national disaster of the first order. Nor does this moral and financial corruption merely infect the Government. Voting out Gordon Brown's stinking New Labour administration would not make the faintest difference. The stench of greed, cheating and dishonesty spreads into the opposition parties. David Cameron said yesterday that all MPs would have to explain to voters why they have claimed what they have. Any Conservative found to have breached the rules, he claimed, risked being 'dispatched in very short order'. But significantly, neither Mr Cameron nor a single member of his front bench had a word of criticism for any of the Labour ministers caught up in scandal yesterday. The truth is that the Tories are shaking with fear over possible further revelations that they have been stealing taxpayers' money with the same free abandon. Some might call this mutual omerta honour among thieves. In fact, it is something far worse - a cross-party conspiracy to defraud at the heart of our public life. Labour, Tory and Liberal Democrat have conspired together to feather their nests and steal money from the public. This means that the fundamental division in British politics is now no longer between Tory and Labour. Instead, it is between a greedy, venal and corrupt political class - and the great mass of ordinary, decent people. MPs and ministers have known about this rotten state of affairs for years, which is why they fought to the bitter end to keep their expenses claims secret. But after yesterday's jaw-dropping revelations, everybody knows that a number of very senior politicians have been engaged in what most right-thinking people would see as criminal activity. The Leader of the House, Harriet Harman, argued that all her colleagues' deceitful and very often poorly-documented expenses claims were 'within the rules'. She could not be more wrong. When the Additional Costs Allowance, which is at the heart of much of this scandal, was introduced in 1971 it was intended to meet the costs incurred by MPs whose constituencies were outside London and who needed to stay in the capital to attend Parliament. It was never intended to finance the development of a property portfolio. That is why the Commons rules don't allow the use of public money for house improvements, only repairs. Yet there are hundreds of examples of such rule-breaking. They all taint the whole concept of parliamentary democracy. This brings us to the disgraceful role played by the man in charge of dealing with MPs' expenses. Instead of acting as a rigorous guardian of taxpayers' interests, is Andrew Walker, the director general of resources, to blame? It was his office which cheerfully waved through the Home Secretary's expenses claim for her husband to watch pornographic films. Not that the MPs, beneficiaries of such largesse, would object. And the systemic corruption doesn't end here. Walker is ultimately accountable to the Commons Speaker, Michael Martin, and therefore is open to the charge that he could wave through any questionable claims because he feels that is what Martin, reflecting the will of the Commons, wants. Forced out: A whispering campaign led to the loss of commissioner for standards Elizabeth Filkin How things have changed since ten years ago, when there was an official at Westminster who genuinely set about rooting out corruption. Her name was Elizabeth Filkin, the parliamentary commissioner for standards. However, she fell foul of MPs when she rigorously set about investigating alleged corruption. She was utterly fearless in her examination of cases involving Labour Cabinet ministers such as John Reid, the late Mo Mowlam and Peter Mandelson. But her honourable approach appalled the Commons establishment. She was personally threatened and soon became the victim of an ugly smear campaign, with disgusting and false rumours spread about her personal life. In due course, with the backing of Speaker Martin and all the main political parties, she was effectively sacked. Her replacement, John Lyon, is an abject figure - as can be seen from the fact that he embarked only with the utmost reluctance on an investigation into the abuse of public money by Jacqui Smith. Had Mrs Filkin remained in post, the Commons would not be in the shameful position it is today. It is time that Speaker Martin stood up and apologised to her on behalf of all MPs. Politicians are now held in public contempt, and rightly so because so many of them have been exposed as liars and thieves. Trust in British democracy stands at its lowest point since the First Reform Act of 1832. Even so, I would argue that it is still possible to clean up British public life. But this means embarking on wholesale reform. First, MPs and ministers who have exploited the public trust must pay back all the money they have received through bogus expenses. For example, Hazel Blears and Geoff Hoon's property portfolios have been amassed partly at taxpayers' expense and therefore they should pay back all the profits to the Treasury to help pay off the mountainous national debt. Second, MPs should no longer be exempt from the usual criminal penalties which apply to cheats in other sections of society. We should be ready to prosecute those who have made fraudulent statements to maximise their benefits. Also, changes of key personnel are vital. Speaker Martin has long been at the apex of the Commons culture of corruption. No House of Commons reform carries an ounce of credibility while he remains in his post. The same applies to the wretched Andrew Walker. It also goes without saying that we need a new set of rules, diligently and honestly enforced. Finally, those MPs and ministers who have abused the great trust placed in them by the British public must not be allowed to remain in the Commons a moment longer than necessary. Those who have stolen from the taxpayer must be forced to step down. This means a series of summer by-elections which, it is fervently to be hoped, will usher in a new breed of politician: men and women who are honest, decent, principled and public-spirited and capable of restoring the oncesplendid reputation of the British Parliament. SOURCE

GORDON BROWNS BROTHER ANDREW WITH MASONIC TIE

Andrew, 53, is the youngest of three brothers. Like Gordon, and his elder brother John, a former head of PR at Glasgow council, he took an early interest in journalism at Edinburgh university. After a spell at BBC Scotland, Andrew went to London to work for his brother as a researcher. In 1987, he became an assistant producer for Newsnight before joining Channel Four News two years later. He became a programme editor in 1994, and worked on scripts for the presenter Jon Snow. In 1996, he took over as the editor of ITN’s political programme Powerhouse. When Powerhouse was replaced by a longer ITN news bulletin in 2003, Andrew Brown left to become the director of media strategy at Weber Shandwick, an international PR company. Colleagues described him as a “very calming, very thoughtful, very mature person with a gentle sense of humour”. David Brain, the joint chief executive of Weber Shandwick, said he was hired “not for his links to his brother but because he is a top-quality broadcaster. I am sure that, if there were any conflicts of interest, we would find a way to resolve them.” Andrew moved again in 2004 to become the head of media relations at EDF, the French utility company. He is now the director of corporate communications. When he took the job, Andrew admitted that “the energy industry is not something I knew much about before”. Nevertheless, he has been at the forefront of EDF’s expansion in Britain after it bought London Electricity, Sweb and Seeboard. He lives with his wife, Clare, 49, in Victoria, central London, less than half a mile from Gordon’s flat. SOURCE Video reaction to MPs' expenses scandal(VIDEO) Brown and how New Labour are screwing the UK in expenses revelations MPs' expenses: Telegraph investigation exposes allowances Stolen disk of MPs' expenses data(And they claim they can protect OUR personal data ) Geoff Hoon's property empire built on taxpayers' money: MPs' expenses Harman forced to defend MPs' expenses FRAUDS saying "claims were made in good faith" Crooked MP's property portfolio's built on dodgy expenses claims

DWP PURNELL CLAIMED EXPENSES ON FLAT HE SHARED WITH GIRLFRIEND

Purnell is another evil New Labour scumbag who Brown selected to bully,abuse ,threaten and harass the poor while lining his pockets with dodgy expenses claims. Purnell 'claimed expenses on flat partly paid for by his girlfriend' James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary, has been accused of "playing the system" after he claimed expenses on a flat to which his girlfriend allegedly contributed. The Cabinet minister and his former fiancée, Lucy Walker, reportedly paid half each of the £1,820-a-month rent for the apartment they shared in Covent Garden, central London until their break-up in late 2006. But a Sunday newspaper alleged that Mr Purnell submitted claims under his taxpayer-funded Parliamentary allowances running to an average of £1,506 a month. Last week, the Cabinet high-flyer was embarrassed after it emerged that the flat was left in a filthy state on his departure, forfeiting his £2,500 deposit as a result. Mr Purnell claimed that he had paid for it to be professionally cleaned. A spokesman said that Mr Purnell's claims were based on a complicated arrangement whereby he refunded his then-girlfriend for part of the rent while she was away travelling for her work as a documentary filmmaker. He added that under House of Commons rules, the minister had been entitled to claim the full cost of running the apartment, but in fact asked Miss Walker to contribute around a third of the rent to mark the amount of time she spent there. The spokesman added: "Despite being entitled to claim in full for the whole rental cost incurred by him and his partner, James claimed less than the amount he himself spent. "The rules of the House of Commons make it clear that an MP is entitled to be reimbursed for the rent or mortgage paid by the MP and their partner. Nevertheless, James went out of his way to ensure overall he claimed less for accommodation than he himself paid." The arrangement was approved by the Parliamentary fees office, but will add to the pressure on MPs to reform the controversial system of second home allowances, which have come to public attention following a series of scandals. Martin Bell, the former MP and anti-corruption campaigner, said: "This is yet another example of an MP playing the system to the limit - within the rules that the MPs themselves have set." SOURCE

TAMIL PROTEST WESTMINSTER 13 APRIL 2009 VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE Tamil net Liberation Tigers of Tamileelam (LTTE) Political Division

WESTMINSTER DESPERATE TO SHOW ELECTORATE THEY ARE AT WAR

What is most intriguing about the latest New Labour debacle and the leaking of an email supposedly to try and smear the tories is the increasing assumption that there is a DIFFERENCE between the two top political donkeys. Westminster is a massive facade run and controlled by masons to give the impression to electors that by voting in the United Kingdom that it can make a difference. Like our legal system, Britains political system is a closed shop were only leaders of major political parties get the promotion via their corporate media to ensure only those parties and leaders get elected into power. The complete control of our political and legal mafia is a masonic ruse of enormous proportions. No new political party , lawyer or judge will make one iota of difference as long as we TOLERATE a system of power and control that despicably rules over our lives and what little wealth we manage to gouge out of a corporate business model that ensures any competition fails. Most major business's are assured the finance from the masonic bankers, anyone who dares to try and compete will be destroyed through their control of the various mechanisms that TAKE OUT anyone trying to infiltrate their complete hold over BIG business. We presently have one of our group who has a large domain presence on the internet and who has been targeted to try and take away his assets they require to continue that control . He has broken the back of the hold the masonic run companies have across this sector of the industry. They dont like this and have made his life as difficult as possible, even considering using bankruptcy as a means to jail him for failing to fill in the necessary paperwork that will expose his holdings for a take over by the masons waiting in the wings to pounce on his assets as soon as they become open to repossess. They are doing this across the United Kingdom with ALL our homes and business's through judicial thugs who work for the masonic coffers and ultimately answer to the British crown who are behind this secret society network of power and control . Common purpose one arm of how they only need the heads of councils, police, judiciary and political parties to exert complete control of their hidden agenda . Many many victims are becoming increasingly organised to EXPOSE their scams. We warn anyone not to trust any major political party and the MP's who wont act in your best interests. We dont know any lawyer or judge in the United Kingdom who can be trusted with our estates as they are ALL controlled by the Law Societies of the UK who's heads are all heavily imbedded in the satanic masonic system of control. Also bankers head this network with the dodgy mortgage scams and loans that leave anyone vulnerable to attack and homeless. Many activists get extra special treatment and struggle to keep a roof over their head as estates are the BIGGEST masonic scam that sees courts fleecing billions from victims of their NON JURY decisions. The British crown and its judiciary destroy more lives in the UK than any other arm of their control network. How long before the United Kingdom citizens start rioting like they are doing in Thailand? We have tolerated this evil system for far to long and the recent murders of Charles De Menezes and Ian Tomlinson, innocent victims of Britains masonic thug coppers shows we have tolerated this bully boy network way to long . Many victims have died behind the closed doors of psychiatric wards were they get rid of the brave activists who have stood up to their tyranny. The media have been expert at covering these up but we hear through the grapevine and have personally witnessed friends and associates facing the masonic thugs that dominate the extremes that continue to threaten our families and instigate the FEAR created by a corporate media who are part and parcel of this evil network of power. MORE POLITICAL SCAMS Brown should revamp No 10 after McBride smear e-mails, Health Secretary says Brown is at the heart of this scandal, says Tory MP accused of one-night stand in spin doctor's sex smear emails

THAI ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENT PROTEST 12 APRIL 2009 VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

DWP MINISTER PURNELL CHARGES TAXPAYERS £400 A MONTH FOR HIS FOOD BILL

CABINET Minister James Purnell charges taxpayers up to £400 a month – for his household groceries. The Work and Pensions Secretary, in charge of the Government’s crackdown on benefit cheats, submits the claims for food under the controversial MPs’ second homes allowance. He is not even required to provide any receipts to support his claims, which have cost taxpayers £9,094 over the last five years. At one point the 39-year-old bachelor, who earns £142,000 a year, tried to increase his tax-free monthly claim to £475 but was told this was too much, even under the lax rules surrounding MPs’ expenses. A spokesman for Mr Purnell – tipped as a future Labour leader – said: “We have no intention of commenting on leaked documents but are confident all claims made by James are within Commons guidelines and have been approved by the Parliamentary authorities. “James fully supports urgent reform of the House’s allowances system.” Documents show the Labour MP for Stalybridge and Hyde, near Manchester, also claims in full for his utility and council tax bills. SOURCE Is James Purnell the worst social security minister ever? James Purnell's £20,000 tax trick while he attacks the poor Purnells(public school TWAT)unfettered altruism towards the poor and vulnerable Is Purnell Covertly Privatising the DWP Labour’s benefits plans hark back to workhouses The curse of James Purnell Hard-headed realism from James Purnell in cloud cuckoo land

JACKBOOT SMITH GROVELLING APOLOGY OVER EXPENSES VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

YOU ARE A SLAVE TO THE GOVERNMENT VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

SMITH AND MP'S DODGY EXPENSES IGNORED BY MASONIC COPS AND REGULATORS VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

JACKBOOT SMITH AND HER DODGY BLUE MOVIE EXPENSES VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BROWN AND HIS NEW WORLD ORDER GLOBAL SOCIETY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

TORY MEP WADES INTO BROWNS APPALLING TRACK RECORD VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

GOVERNMENT MASONIC SPEAK

Former home secretary Blunkett and Reid and present home secretary Jackboot Smith When Jackboot Smith or Brown sends out press releases on behalf of the British Government they are not in the business of protecting the British public only the British establishment controlled from their headquarters at the United Grand Lodge of England. These despicable patsies and morons like Smith and the never ending parade of numpties that masquerade as home secretaries under NEW Labour and before under the Tories, are all hand picked spokesmen and women for the masonic lodges of the UK who behind the scenes are controlling EVERYTHING. The bankers, judges,lawyers,coppers and council officials operate first and foremost to promote and protect the British establishment and the utterly corrupt British Crown and NOT the long suffering electorate who assume they have a VOTE, Yes a vote on which masonic donkey will be first past the post. We have a corporate media that ONLY promotes political parties that are headed by masons. We have a mass media that ensures NO alternative political party will take over the running of the UK because the vast bulk of the media is controlled and owned by high level masons. This is an evil network of power that wants to monitor and control us all, so if we step out of line with the masonic New World Order agenda, we will swiftly be dealt with . UK psychiatric wards are full of victims who dared put their head above the parapet. Our group know of many instances when activists have been murdered or chemically lobotomized by so called professors and doctors all part of the masonic run General Medical Council who know the quickest way to get rid of the bad apples that the British establishment and their masonic goons need to shut down for fear of their secrets getting out. Despite attempts by the odd presenter on British TV to hint at these issues NONE OF THEM DARE mention the word MASONS on their shows as they will quickly find their careers will be over commanded by the bosses who run these TV networks and who take their orders from the Grand Lodge . Any journalist or supposed investigative journalist will find their bank accounts ,private correspondence and any other personal details will be used to undermine them , defame them and finally lose their jobs,homes and livelihoods destroying their ability to warn the British public as to what drives these evil bastards in their satanic powermongering. The ONLY terrorists we have to worry about in the UK come from the hallowed walls of the satanic lodges were they train their dupes to instigate persecution campaigns against ANYONE who threatens their all powering wealth creating scams . The ringleaders of those scams are Britains judicial mafia who refuse us JURIES while sitting in judgement on the billions of pounds they fleece every day in family/civil courts across the UK. Also the massive theft of children for their networks of abuse. Jersey childrens home only one example of how they operate and control their membership. This is a sinister and evil network of power that blocks the real exposures of how they control us all. Fear their court system, as it is there more than anywhere else, they consume the vast quantities of wealth for their masonic coffers using their judicial mafia. MORE MASONIC SCAMS HERE

NEW LABOURS TOP CRIMINALS

McNulty, Jackboot Smith and devious Purnell These NEW Labour mobsters steal from the poor while lining their corrupt pockets. They should all be jailed. Is there no end to the outrageous ruses MPs dream up to fleece the taxpayer? In any other job, they'd be jailed. Shamelessness in Parliament appears to be a truly bottomless well. At the weekend, another Government minister had to put his hands up to yet another expenses fiddle. Employment Minister Tony McNulty admitted he had claimed some £60,000 as a second-home allowance for a property which is actually his parents' home. Despite the fact that he and his wife, Chief Inspector of Schools Christine Gilbert, live in a house that she owns just three miles from Westminster, the minister has been claiming up to £14,000 a year in Parliamentary expenses to help pay for the second house in Harrow where his parents live, 11 miles from the Commons. Caught out: Tony McNulty has been 'directing his sanctimony at everyone but himself' When confronted with this charge, Mr McNulty initially claimed that he was doing nothing wrong as it was 'within the rules'. But then he appeared to change his mind and suddenly announced he had stopped claiming the second-home allowance - while denying that this was because, ahem, he had been caught out. More remarkably still, Mr McNulty, who is also Minister for London and a possible Mayoral candidate, went on to say that MPs who live as he does within 60 miles of Westminster should be banned from receiving the £24,000-a-year handout. Exploit Even by the standards of this Government it takes some brass neck, after being caught out in a scam, to turn on a sixpence like this and attack others for doing exactly the same thing. It's as if we're expected to think there's the Tony McNulty who has been pulling a fast one, but who is somehow quite different from the Tony McNulty who says the practice should be banned! Maybe the minister should seek treatment for a split personality. (Perhaps he could claim that on expenses, too.) Mr McNulty certainly sees no contradiction in directing his sanctimony at everyone but himself. He was quick enough to condemn failed bankers for their enormous pay- offs; yet when asked to return the taxpayers' money he has trousered through his second-home scam, he was strangely reluctant to agree. Minister's £60,000 expenses for parents' home: 'Rumbled' Tony McNulty drops claim... then calls for it to be curtailed What grotesque hypocrisy. But Mr McNaughty is merely the latest in a dismal procession of ministers who use ever more ingenious ruses to exploit the expenses rules. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith claims expenses of £20,000 per year by arguing - imaginatively - that her sister's house where Ms Smith lodges during the week is her main home, rather than the substantial house in her Midlands constituency where she lives with her husband and young children. In 2005, it was revealed that Children's Secretary Ed Balls and his wife, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Yvette Cooper, had switched their 'second-home' designation from their house in West Yorkshire to their £655,000 London home - even though their children go to school from this house - to help pay a £438,000 mortgage. Last year, the Work and Pensions Secretary James Purnell was accused of pocketing thousands of pounds in expenses and avoiding tax by designating one of his properties as both his main residence and a second home. He said his London flat was his second home so he could claim Commons expenses. But when he sold the property in 2004, he also said it was his main home - thereby avoiding Capital Gains Tax. In all these cases, the excuse is always the same: such arrangements are 'within the rules'. To which the obvious reply is: so change the rules. If they are so loosely formulated that the word 'home' means whatever an MP chooses it to mean, however ridiculous, then there's something very wrong with the rules. But in any event, the MPs' parroted response is wholly inadequate. The 'Nuremberg defence' by former Nazis was that they were 'only obeying orders'. The Westminster defence by MPs creatively interpreting their expenses is that they are 'only doing what the rules allow'. Morality But what about the question of whether or not this is right? By any normal standards, it is outrageous for an MP to justify using taxpayers' money to fund his parents' house as if it is his own second home. A home is where you live. The sole point of the second-home allowance is to help MPs with constituencies far from Westminster to live within easy travelling distance of the Commons. But Mr McNulty's main house is in Hammersmith, merely nine London Underground stops from Westminster. Clearly, he doesn't need a housing allowance at all. It is equally outrageous for Jacqui Smith to claim that her house in Redditch, Worcestershire, is not her main home when her children go to school from there. Similarly, the reverse claim by Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls that their Castleford constituency house is their main home - even though their children go to school from their house in London. It is plain that MPs are manipulating these allowances to help with the cost of their most expensive residence, wherever that might be. If that's within the rules, then to paraphrase Charles Dickens, the rules are an ass. But by the rules that really count - those of honesty and morality - such behaviour is simply a fraud on the public. It's not even as if these people are struggling to make ends meet. Mr McNulty and his wife have a combined annual income of a third-of-a-million pounds; Jacqui Smith is on a salary of £141,000 per year; and Mr Balls and Ms Cooper rack up between them an annual income of £282,000. Yet such MPs seem to regard a seat in Parliament as a ticket to a gravy train as of right. Instead of abiding by the spirit of the rules, they use them as a green light to get away with whatever they can - confident so many other MPs are up to the same thing that they will never be brought to book. Ignore Even after the rules were revised following the uproar over the 'John Lewis list' - the informal guidelines on how much of their second-home allowance MPs could spend on home furnishings - MPs can still charge for white goods, sofas, chairs, tables, beds, cutlery and crockery, security fittings, cleaners and decoration to kit out their second homes. There seems to be no end to the ruses they dream up to fleece the taxpayer. Some husband-and-wife MPs claim two sets of allowances to run the same house; other MPs claim mortgage allowances on properties they own outright; still others have put their spouses or relatives on their taxpayer-funded payroll. In any other trade or profession, such behaviour would land people in jail. Yet as the public's watchdog, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards John Lyon has proved absolutely toothless. He cleared Yvette Cooper and Ed Balls of wrongdoing and twice rejected a complaint against Jacqui Smith, only finally investigating her after the evidence became too embarrassing to ignore. MPs even voted to exempt their expenses claims from scrutiny under Freedom of Information legislation. In their determination to avoid transparency or accountability for their behaviour, MPs seem to be going out of their way to express contempt for the electorate. Quite simply, they have clearly lost all sense of what public service actually means. And correspondingly, the public have now unsurprisingly lost all faith in the Parliamentary process from which they are now dangerously alienated. Especially at a time of growing economic hardship, these expenses scams are intolerable. While MPs fiddle, democracy slowly but inexorably burns. SOURCE

WE'RE THE GOVERNMENT AND YOU'RE NOT VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

MANDELSON GUNGED VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BROWN AND HIS PLANS FOR NEW WORLD ORDER BANKING SYSTEM VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

POLITICAL CLASS GETTING RICH ON UK CITIZENS HARD-WON CASH

THE police are predicting a “summer of rage” as taxpayers seek to get even with those who have been ripping them off. No wonder. And it will not merely be the spiv bankers in the line of fire. For even as the state of the economy worsens before our eyes, the excesses of Britain’s political and social elite seem to become more extreme. While the rest of us have been tightening our belts, a distasteful culture of entitlement to our money has taken root in the corridors of power. It is difficult to say which of the many abuses uncovered recently is worst. The revelation that it is easily possible for a British MEP to rake in £1million in allowances in a single term on the Brussels gravy train is enough to raise the blood pressure, while the ongoing refusal of Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to acknowledge any problem with her £116,000 “second home” expenses suggests she inhabits a different moral universe. But what about the £170,000 of our money spent on modern art to decorate the walls of Jack Straw’s new Department for Justice? Then there is Prince “Air Miles” Andrew’s £4,000 helicopter ride to reopen a bridge (he could have gone by rail for £90). What view should we take of Tory grandee Michael Ancram, whose personal fortune is thought to run to tens of millions, claiming £50,000 towards upkeep of his country house, including the removal of moss from its grounds? When the economy was doing well, such examples of profligacy were maddening enough but taxpayers at least had the compensation of knowing general living standards were rising. Now that hundreds of thousands of people are out of work and the national finances are in an almighty mess, it is simply unforgivable that ridiculous calls should be made on the public purse. That the authorities fail to appreciate how obscene the excesses are and fail to act against them suggests that a whole cadre of politicians, civil servants and assorted hangers-on is completely insulated from the cares which afflict the general population. FULL ARTICLE HERE

GORDON BROWN - FREEMASON ELECTIVE DICTATOR OF GB VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

UK GOVERNMENT USING TERRORISM FEARS TO UNDERMINE CIVIL LIBERTIES

Ministers 'using fear of terror' Stella Rimington has often been critical of the government A former head of MI5 has accused the government of exploiting the fear of terrorism to restrict civil liberties. Dame Stella Rimington, 73, said people in Britain felt as if they were living "under a police state". In an interview in a Spanish newspaper, published in the Daily Telegraph, she also accuses the US of "tortures". The Home Office said it was vital to strike the right balance between privacy, protection and sharing of personal data. It said any policies which impact on privacy must be "necessary and proportionate". Dame Stella, who stood down as the director general of the security service in 1996, has previously been critical of the government's policies, including its attempts to extend pre-charge detention for terror suspects to 42 days and the controversial plan to introduce ID cards. "It is time to take stock and to repeal abusive laws and policies enacted in recent years" says Mary Robinson International Commission of Jurists "It would be better that the government recognised that there are risks, rather than frightening people in order to be able to pass laws which restrict civil liberties, precisely one of the objects of terrorism - that we live in fear and under a police state," she told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia. She said the British security services were "no angels," but they did not kill people. "The US has gone too far with Guantanamo and the tortures," she said. "MI5 does not do that. Furthermore it has achieved the opposite effect - there are more and more suicide terrorists finding a greater justification." 'Take stock' Dame Stella's comments come as a study is published by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) that accuses the US and the UK of undermining the framework of international law. Former Irish president Mary Robinson, the president of the ICJ said: "Seven years after 9/11 it is time to take stock and to repeal abusive laws and policies enacted in recent years. "Human rights and international humanitarian law provide a strong and flexible framework to address terrorist threats." The Conservatives said the government's push to extend the detention time limit for terror suspects was the kind of measure condemned by the report. Shadow security minister Baroness Neville-Jones said: "The Conservative Party is committed to ensuring that security measures are proportionate and adhere to the rule of law." Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Ed Davey said: "This is damning testament to just how much liberty has been ineffectually sacrificed in the 'war on terror'." "We have very broad police powers which sweep the innocent up with the guilty" says Isabella Sankey, Liberty Isabella Sankey, director of policy at human rights campaign group Liberty, said she was "enormously heartened" by what Dame Stella had said. "Over the last seven years, we've seen a number of measures passed, some of which affect very few of us in a horrible and terrible way, whether that's house arrest under control orders or rendition and torture in foreign states," she said. "We've also seen many, many measures that affect all of us just a little bit and, most of all, which seriously impact our rights to privacy. "We have very broad police powers which sweep the innocent up with the guilty." 'Effective safeguards' A Home Office spokesman said: "The government has been clear that where surveillance or data collection will impact on privacy they should only be used where it is necessary and proportionate." "This provides law enforcement agencies with the tools to protect the public as well as ensuring government has the ability to provide effective public services while ensuring there are effective safeguards and a solid legal framework that protects civil liberties." Dame Stella became the first female head of MI5 in 1992. SOURCE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS

V FOR VENDETTA - GOVERNMENT PHILOSOPHY VIDEO
FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

VIDEO CLIP THE E.U. DID NOT WANT YOU TO SEE VIDEO

On the day before the EU constitution was signed in Lisbon the resistance in Strasbourg demands a referendum across Europe. The European Union is a Masonic monster and a stepping stone to the Illuminati's plans for a New World Order. Their plan failed using Hitler now they are forcing us into bigger and bigger superstates with little or NO accountability. The E.U. will show its true colours when it gets the power it is fighting the people for. British political goons like Brown have gone along with these fascist plans as he himself admits to being part of that New World Order. FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

UK GOVERNMENT AND THEIR SINISTER ADVERTS VIDEO

The UK Government have for years been threatening and intimidating car drivers in the UK. From the most frivolous car parking offences that costs at least £120 to the latest ad for road tax offences. Whether you are ILL or on holiday if you dare forget to IMMEDIATELY road tax your car a whole platoon of Government goons patrol UK streets forcibly removing cars and crushing them NO MATTER the reason. A vicious and ruthless Government campaign against the long suffering public. The price many car drivers pay for living in the UK under a fascist police state . FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

UK MINISTERS TRY TO DEFEND £1.3bn ATTACK ON THE WELFARE STATE

The government last night defended radical reforms of the benefits system, which will require unemployed people to prove they are taking steps to get back to work or face cuts to their benefits, as a "fair deal". The £1.3bn "tough love" package, unveiled by UK Work and Pensions Secretary James Purnell in a White Paper yesterday, includes plans to make the vast majority of people on incapacity benefit attend job interviews, while those out of work for a year will be required to do four weeks' full-time activity. Those still not in paid employment after two years may have to work full-time for their benefit. FULL ARTICLE HERE This is another masonic ruse. Purnell will be redirecting money paid into National Insurance by employees prior to them suffering ill health and expecting that to be returned in benefits. Instead Purnell's lodge buddies would be getting the contracts via the usual backdoor and the large cash handouts who then simply remove anyone they like from the benefits list. They are using the worst case scenario's to feed this to the sheeple. Instead of showing how heart and cancer patients struggle to get the pittance of benefits jumping through hoops regularly in staged assessments that when appealed come before tribunals made of up lackeys of the state. The evil that hides behind the DWP(Dept of Work or Prison) can be properly scrutinized at http://www.dwpcorruption.co.uk/ were many cases are highlighted showing the disgraceful way those genuinely entitled to claims are treated. All the mass media do is provide the distortions and propaganda that feeds this fodder to those who then think its a good idea until they fall ill themselves by then it is FAR TO LATE.

ONE LAW FOR THE RICH.....

A look at the "hidden economy" - but first,some words from George Bernard Shaw. The law is equal before all of us; but we are not all equal before the law. Virtually there is one law for the rich and another for the poor, one law for the cunning and another for the simple, one law for the forceful and another for the feeble, one law for the ignorant and another for the learned, one law for the brave and another for the timid, and within family limits one law for the parent and no law at all for the child. I found this exchange in today's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report on the "hidden economy". A panel of MPs was trying to find out whether the taxman is doing enough to deal with an estimated two million people defrauding an estimated £2bn a year from the revenue. MP: If one of my constituents was caught, say, stealing £5 from a post office, they would undoubtedly be prosecuted and there would be consequences of publicity. Yet if a barrister steals several hundred by avoiding his tax, then there is no publicity and he is allowed to carry on regardless. It does seem a trifle unfair, does it not? Taxman: I can understand where you are coming from but we cannot prosecute everybody. There are reasons, and I will come on to those - but when it comes to natural justice, it does seem that GBS was right when one measures the vigour with which the authorities prosecute the rich tax evader compared to, say, the relatively poor TV licence evader. Q: How many people were prosecuted for TV licence evasion in 2005-6? A: 157,452. (The Television Licensing Authority claims a 99.9% conviction rate.) Q: How many people were prosecuted for tax evasion last year? A: 69. The amount lost through tax evasion is more times ten times that lost from people not paying their television licence. And the likelihood of a benefit fraudster being prosecuted is thirty times greater than a tax fraudster. MP: Our friends in the Department for Work and Pensions are prosecuting 60 cases per thousand benefit fraud cases. You are only prosecuting two cases per thousand hidden economy cases. I am not suggesting that you should rise to the level of 60 per thousand but two per thousand is very low, is it not? This is a tiny chance of being prosecuted if you are in the hidden economy. These are people deliberately evading paying tax. Taxman: It is a low number and we do have plans to increase it when we can apply the skilled resource to it. The difference between tax evasion and TV licence evasion or benefit fraud is that it is hugely expensive to prove that somebody has defrauded the revenue. In fact, the revenue makes a loss on most cases: the cost of prosecution is around £30,000 and the average amount of missing tax detected is just £11,260. Unless the tax involved exceeds £10,000 and the case has other features, such as involving a tax advisor or barrister, criminal prosecution will not be considered. The consequence, according to the PAC report, is that "there remains very little chance of someone in the hidden economy being prosecuted". But just how assiduous is the revenue in prosecuting high-profile fraudsters like barristers? MP: What... schemes are you going to use in the future to try and tackle the hidden economy, particularly at the upper end of the scale? Taxman: We have got several things going on. We have got more than 20 projects. We are trying to do the same with builders and decorators and the like by matching publicly available information, maybe advertisements in the Yellow Pages or elsewhere, with our databases. That tends to be at the lower end. At the upper end of the scheme we have a project looking at barristers, for example 57 barristers who were in the hidden economy at some time in recent years. MP: What, barristers doing legal work in this country perfectly normally are not paying any tax at all? Taxman: Not paying any tax. Builders and decorators are targeted then - and barristers too. How many of the 57 dodgy lawyers were prosecuted? Taxman: The project that identified 57 barristers as failing to notify has not, at this time, led to any prosecutions. SOURCE What credit crunch? As Super-Rich Upgrade the Old Jumbo Jet What credit crunch? Latest Fashion Trend for the Super-Rich

THE HENCHMEN BEHIND LABOURS ATTACK ON THE POOR

Here exposed are three of the henchmen behind the New Labour attack on the poor across the UK. Professor Paul GREGG quoted by DWP(Dim Witted Pr*ck)James Purnell justifying the ruthless attack on the poor . The Centre for Economic Performance is another think tank of the UK masonic crooks who use a myriad of self appointed professionals to STEAL money from the poor.These EVIL bastards are all part of the SCUM Purnell and the other headcases that operate in Browns cabinet doing irreparable harm to the poor creating ever more homelessness and destitution. They all operate from a NWO masonic agenda and determined at any cost to punish the poor for their failed policies.Further investigations into unelected quangos dictating the direction of the UK is TOTALLY unacceptable and in time these mobsters will be outed for their attacks on the poor. Gregg and his draconian workfare policies Gregg Gregg and his Professor of Economics page VAN REENEN MACHIN

BRITAIN'S TOP MASONIC MOBSTER DWP(DIM WITTED PR*CK) JAMES PURNELL

This evil bastard has been brought in to destroy the UK's poorest citizens. He is planning to use lie detectors on Britains poor, but NOT on the corrupt legal and political mob running the UK. Promoted by NWO Brown as head of the DWP (DEPT OF WORK OR PRISON) he has done nothing but attack those least able to defend themselves against this bully boy who is nothing but a little SHIT who will, like all previous DWP heads fall on his ass, when civil war breaks out from his draconian backed changes to welfare reform. If the prisons in the UK aren't already bulging, the measures proposed will see a massive increase in crime when more and more are pushed into extreme deprivation by this ruthless bastards plans. While in recession he is planning to remove the minimum asssistance to the poorest sections of UK society in changes to the welfare system that wouldn't look out of place in medieval Britain or in a discussion at a Gestapo meeting. Here is a record of some of his notorious past history . In 1996 Purnell was one of three Islington councillors who were sued for libel by fellow Labour councillor Liz Davies. Davies had previously been selected as the Labour Party prospective parliamentary candidate for Leeds North East, but the selection had been vetoed by the party's National Executive Committee. Part of the evidence to the NEC had centred around Davies' willingness to abide by the Labour Whip in Parliament, with reference to her time as a member of the Labour group in Islington. Liz Davies claimed that, in their evidence before the NEC, the three councillors had claimed she incited violence during a committee meeting. This led to an out-of-court settlement, under which the three apologised for the allegations they had made and made contributions to the general election campaign of the local MP, Jeremy Corbyn. Paul Diggett, one of James Purnell's political researchers was convicted in January 2004 of downloading child pornography from Purnell's PC, without the MP's knowledge. Diggett was Labour's candidate for Cheadle in 1997, and was suspended from the party following his arrest. In May 2006, Purnell auctioned off a signed copy of the Hutton Report signed by Alastair Campbell. Stewart Jackson, a Conservative MP complained over the insensitive nature of how the report was auctioned to raise funds for the Labour Party. In January 2007, it was reported by the Daily Mail that James Purnell was given an 'easy ride' in an interview with Jeremy Paxman on BBC's Newsnight because he was having a relationship with one of the producers, Thea Rogers. The BBC found no wrongdoing, while Purnell has also denied inappropriately using his government car. In September 2007, a photograph of James Purnell was faked and released by the press office at Tameside General hospital as part of a press release for the Tameside Hospital Private Finance Initiative (PFI) rebuilding deal. The Tameside Trust claimed that Purnell agreed to the amalgamation of the two photographs, as he was late for the original photo call, but Purnell denied this. Another Labour MP, Tom Levitt, present for the photoshoot stated that he and other Labour MPs deliberately left a gap for Purnell when the original photograph was taken, knowing that Purnell's image would be superimposed onto their photograph. Critics described the photograph as being "misleading"; it was especially damaging as it came at a time when Purnell has criticised the media for misleading the public over telephone phone-in scams and over news stories that were not true. Prior to becoming a cabinet minister, Purnell has repeatedly been one of the most expensive MPs in the United Kingdom and being confirmed as the most expensive in Greater Manchester, with expenses in 2004 of more than £120,000. SOURCE

UK GOVERNMENT POLICY TURN WOMEN TO PROSTITUTION SO DONT BLAME MEN

Home secretary Jacqui Smith is once again pontificating about another area of life were she reckons toughening up prostitution laws will STOP it going on. Here is a government that has been pushing ever more women and children into abject poverty who as a last resort sometimes are forced to sell their body. There are high class hookers in major cities who make a fortune out of selling themselves with many getting paid more an hour than the Prime Minister and Jacqui Smith. Maybe she hates prostitution so much because those women are making more than they do f*cking men. Jacqui Smith is a typical man hating radical feminist, that if there is a problem in society it must be men to blame. Her and the glut of radical feminist political windbags voted to push more women and their children into poverty while their disastrous policies have been destroying family units encouraging women to divorce if their husband dares even to raise his voice. Suggesting that men who do are domestic abusers. The failed Child Support system that suggested women who do get out of marriage, the government would look after them with lucrative payments from the CSA was another con. Sure they hounded the fathers into early graves but the money seldom reached the women or children as the system cost so much to maintain with plenty of lucrative salaries for the masons at the heart of another government scam to keep them in the executive lifestyles they think they deserve. One of the main factors in ruthless secretive family court outcomes. Smith is an evil power monger distracting attention away from years of appalling New Labour policies and onto men once again as always the reason why the poor downtrodden women suffer so much. SHE should look at the attacks on the family her own party have instigated that will see far more mothers and children in abject poverty thanks to her and ministers like the head of Dept of Work or Prison James Purnell who would not look out of place at a Gestapo meeting. Ruthless evil control freaks pushing forward the global NWO agenda that the masons/zionist/illuminati have been planning for a very long time using FEAR,POVERTY and the ever increasing dependence on the state.ORDER OUT OF CHAOS. New Labour dominated by radical feminist men haters like Jacqui Smith,Harriet Harman,Hazel Blears , Margaret Beckett, Patricia Scotland, Beverley Hughes and Tessa Jowell. Penalising the punters Prostitutes clients to be charged with rape says Jacqui Smith Jacqui Smith attacks oldest profession Tough new plans to get jobless into work 'may cause poverty', warns top government adviser 130 families a day have homes seized Welfare plan may cause VAST poverty UK Benefits plan could cause even more poverty Atlantis :The rich party in Dubai while the rest of us are forced into poverty Grow up Jacqui Smith , it's your law that belongs in the gutter

JAMES PURNELL DEPT OF WORK OR PRISON
Click on pics for full screen versions Evil Purnell Minister for the Dept of Work or Prison

THE MEN BEHIND OBAMA 2 PART VIDEO
FULL SCREEN PART1 HERE       FULL SCREEN PART2 HERE

OBAMA AND HIS GAY AGENDA VIDEO

Quote from Obama victory speech at 2.57 minutes "Black,white,Hispanic,Asian,native american,GAY,straight" Obama and his wife have been courting the GAY vote for a very long time. When a minority GAY agenda is quoted ahead of STRAIGHT America that should cause ALARM bells to ring loud and clear. That Obama places GAYS before heterosexuals and why so many MEN and their families are being destroyed in the very courts Obama,his wife and fellow lawyers and judges operate in their anti-heterosexual rulings. GAY funding has allowed a twisted political agenda to undermine heterosexual families giving priority to a small gay hard line lobbying group that has dominated US policy for far to long in corrupt family courts. Obama has shown time and again and in his speech just were his priorities lie. FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE California voters put a stop to gay marriage

AMERICA HAS A CHOICE?

Another round of American election farces is underway but do the American people truly believe they have REAL choice? Do they NOT realise the satanists bankrolling the Democrats and Republicans head the US tyranny and there wont be ANY CHANGE as they are proclaiming, only more of the same dire policies that will continue to bully the world and the ordinary American citizen. It is a WIN WIN for the Zionist/illuminati/masonic controllers of the American New World Order. Satanists taking over the world The greatest political farce on earth

ATHAN GIBBS DYING FOR FREE ELECTIONS VIDEO

The problem of unreliable, unaudited electronic voting machines could be solved very easily. But somehow the concept has escaped every since state in the Union - and the man who championed the solution died in a car crash just before he was to speak before Congress. The news media is not interested in a solution, Congress is not interested, the Democratic Party is not interested and, of course, the Republican Party is not interested either. FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE SOURCE

HOW THE UK ESTABLISHMENT HAS PLOTTED AGAINST DEMOCRACY

News Alliance nails another outrageous New Labour lie and questions the overt pressure mounted by MI5 not to release the damning report into the Wilson Plots In the immediate aftermath of Harold Wilson's resignation in 1976, his successor Jim Callaghan ordered Lord Hunt to investigate the plots by MI5 and the Ministry of Defence to bring down the Wilson-led Labour governments. It is widely known that Lord Hunt conducted a thorough investigation through his extensive links in Whitehall and produced a superlative report into the machinations of the Secret State to destroy Harold Wilson that later became known as the Wilson Plots. And since 1977, the report has sat in a Whitehall safe, secreted from public view and the truth has been buried since then. The Hunt Report names the names of the MI5, MI6 and MoD officers involved in the plots to smear and destroy Harold Wilson and by so doing crush democracy. The objective of which was a military junta led by senior MI5 and Army officers. The machinations that came to be known as the Wilson Plots are of such a serious nature that to make them and their authors public would render them untenable at any time in the future. That was the point behind our campaign to compel the release of the Hunt Report, to defend democracy against shadow 'government' and the campaign will continue despite the Home Secretary's latest lie. Three months ago we wrote to the Prime Minister Gordon Brown urging him to release the Hunt Report in the public interest. The PM replied to the effect that the matter would be delegated to his Home Secretary, the hapless Jacqui Smith whose great obsession is the National Identity Register and mass surveillance of British citizens. After three months and several letters to the Home Secretary chasing up our original line of enquiry, we heard nothing as the Home Office ignored us. But after our investigation into whistleblower John Francis Smith led us to a safehouse in Holly Mount, Hampstead on 25 October 2008 shadowed by the Metropolitan Police, the Home Secretary was compelled to act.... Just 72 hours later, and after being ignored for three months, a letter was penned to the editor of News Alliance to the effect that the Home Office does not have the Hunt Report for which the Home Secretary is responsible. We are being asked to believe that a devastating report commissioned by a former Prime Minister with the direct involvement of the Home Office is not held by New Labour regime. This is another outrageous lie so typical of the last 11 years of New Labour spin, corruption, sleaze and outright lies. We know only too well that the Director General of MI5 has pressured the Home Secretary not to release the Hunt Report and the 'best' tale that Jacqui Smith can come up with is to say the report does not exist. Does this mean then that the Hunt Report never existed and that Jim Callaghan ordered a phantom inquiry into the Wilson Plots? It certainly does not, it simply means that the New Labour regime will not release the report for fear of serious repercussions to its beloved MI5 and the collapse of the Police State they have together engineered under the guise of the laughable 'war on terror'. It further illustrates that New Labour is determined to keep the truth buried about the Wilson Plots to bring down two Labour governments under Harold Wilson. And cements forever the fact that New Labour has no loyalty to Old Labour and the tens-of-thousands of traditional Labour Party members and supporters targeted by the Wilson Plots. Have no doubt at all that this schism will lead to the death of New Labour as a political entity because News Alliance will now go on the offensive, covertly and overtly, to spread the news of New Labour's great betrayal of its traditional supporters. And the Home Office letter itself is a 'perfect' New Labour creation, signed by no other than 'Will Smith'. That signature gave us a huge lift and caused hours of mirth and mocking humour for which we thank the Home Secretary. We doubt very much that a 'Will Smith' actually works for the Home Secretary and that this is simply another juvenile New Labour prank at a reference to Will Smith the actor of Enemy of State fame. And the Home Secretary should have no doubt at all that News Alliance and its supporters are indeed enemies of the State for publishing the truth time and again. But this idiotic prank demonstrates that New Labour is completely unfit to hold any form of government and should be thrown out at the next General Election in the name of democracy. It is also perfectly clear now that MI5 and the Secret State combined run Britain and that New Labour is nothing more than a figurehead, token 'government' to give shadow government the appearance of being democratic. What distinguishes modern Britain from the old Soviet Union? The spooks run Britain and New Labour or 'Conservative' elected governments are mere false flag operations to creat the false impression that Britain is a democracy instead of a Police State. Above else what Britain needs is a government to put the spooks in their place and remind them daily that they are public servants and not public masters. Today, 2nd of November 2008, is history in the making and Harold Wilson must be turning in the grave. But more so the historic aspect comes in the form of New Labour's great betrayal of Old Labour. Everyone who supported traditional Labour Party policies and tried to fight for a better country has today been betrayed. We urge all of you never to forget this betrayal and to vote the wretched New Labour regime out of office at the next General Election. Some traditional Labour voters (white working class) may ask why this affects them? The answer is quite simple: By refusing to release the Hunt Report, the New Labour regime consents dirty tricks, smears and criminality of the Wilson Plots to destroy British democracy and so doing takes the side of MI5 against the people. It is at last damning evidence of the fact that the State is at war against the people of Britain and that they will not stop until the British people summon the collect will to put these crooks out of business permanently! SOURCE

BUSH TRYING TO PARDON HIMSELF FOR WAR CRIMES VIDEO

Bush before his departure from public office is now trying to use legislation that will HE THINKS avoid him being charged with war crimes. However he may think he can use American legislation to avoid prosecution but war crimes is an INTERNATIONAL violation and as such it is the REST of the world not the USA that decides these things. His desperate attempt along with his neocon political criminals shows the real truth of what he has been getting away with for far to long. FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

PALIN'S MASONIC LEANINGS

"Prince Hall Masonic Week", Alaska Government Archives, April 19, 2008 Since this official announcement was signed by Governor Palin just a few months ago, it is important to recognize the extremely positive view the Governor has toward Freemasonry! Since we have just posted an article showing the Masonic poses which Governor Palin and her husband, Todd, have publicly flashed, it is extremely relevant to realize that Governor Palin holds the Masonic Lodge in very high regard! "WHEREAS, the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Alaska Inc., Free and Accepted Masons of the Alaska Jurisdiction has been in existence since September 1969. "WHEREAS, the members of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge, F. & A.M. and the Prince Hall Grand Chapter Order of Eastern Stars have rendered valuable service in all levels of government and in their communities. The Prince Hall Masonic Family has become a valuable resource in Alaska, through its civic contributions. "WHEREAS, special recognition is extended to the Prince Hall Masonic family for its commitment to civic contributions, demonstrated through the awarding of educational scholarships and its substantial financial and volunteer participation in the commemoration of the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. celebration. "WHEREAS, the Prince Hall Grand Lodge will convene its 39th Annual Communication and the 36th Annual Communication of the Prince Hall Grand Chapter, Order of Eastern Stars, beginning April 19, 2008, in Anchorage, Alaska. "NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the state of Alaska, do hereby proclaim April 19-22, 2008, as: "Prince Hall Masonic Week in Alaska, and encourage all citizens to observe these days." SOURCE

NEW WORLD ORDER MADMAN BROWN

NEW LABOUR RATS JUMPING THE SINKING SHIP

Margaret Hodge has told Gordon Brown she wants to leave, say friends Despite her frequent gaffes, Margaret Hodge has managed to remain a minister since the year after Tony Blair’s landslide 1997 election victory. However, Mandrake hears that Blair’s close friend and former Islington neighbour may remain only a few days longer in Gordon Brown’s increasingly shambolic government. Allies of the 64-year-old culture minister say she has informed the Prime Minister that she wants to leave his administration. “Like Ruth Kelly, Margaret wants to spend more time with her family,” says one of her chums in the arts world. “In Margaret’s case, there is no question that it is genuinely the case. She regards her husband, Henry, as very much the priority these days.” After my disclosure, it remains to be seen whether Brown allows her departure to be announced as part of his reshuffle, expected next week. At 3am on Wednesday morning, his henchmen called an impromptu press conference in a hotel bar in Manchester after it was reported that Ruth Kelly, the Transport Secretary, would step down in the reshuffle. The wife of Sir Henry Hodge, the High Court judge, Margaret co-nominated the candidature of Blair to be the new Labour leader after the death of John Smith in 1994 and has held four different government posts, including the first Minister for Children. SOURCE

WHICH ORGANISATION IS THIS?

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 600 employees and has the following employee statistics . 29 have been accused of spouse abuse 7 have been arrested for fraud 9 have been accused of writing bad cheques 17 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses 3 have done time for assault 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit 14 have been arrested on drug-related charges 8 have been arrested for shoplifting 21 are currently defendants in lawsuits 84 have been arrested for drink driving in the last year Which organisation is this ? It's the 635 members of the House of Commons, the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us inline. What a bunch of bastards we have running our country - it says it all. And just to top all that they probably have the best 'corporate' pension scheme in the country!! If you agree that this is an appalling state of affairs, please pass it on to everyone you know. It's time to stand up to this lot Regards -- Justice Must Be Seen, To Be Done.

WHY HETEROSEXUAL MEN SHOULD NOT VOTE TORY

Senior Tory GOVE defends gays and single mothers in keynote speech 'supporting families' MAYBE THE MOST MONSTROUS QUOTE IN THE TEXT 'It's not gay men who are abusing women and abandoning children - it's straight men. " The continued attack on heterosexual men is identical to South African apartheid in that only blacks committed crimes against whites and NEVER the other way around. This is dangerous ground this EVIL bastard is now on. It will be the straight men who will ultimately have to fight the tyranny that we are heading down to protect the women fooled by this utter nonsense as the government fear the heterosexual men that have had enough of their bullying judges attempting to destroy a mans rights, his home ,his family and children from the political and legal mobsters who will in time GET THEIR DAY. FULL ARTICLE HERE

OBAMA PRINCE HALL MASON VISITS FELLOW MASONS BROWN AND BLAIR

Masons Blair and Brown meet Prince Hall mason Obama who is a member of the Martinist order and also a Mason of another irregular lodge. He's completely bought and in the pockets of the Illuminati. He could not meet the two of them together as they HATE each other. The New World Order facade goes on with a complicit mass media determined to ONLY promote potential Prime Ministers and Presidents who are all part of a satanic cult. Like the Clintons the Obama's are both lawyers.Blair a MASON and a lawyer. SOURCE

MICHELLE OBAMA'S SPEECH AT THE GAY AND LESBIAN'S LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

The Obama's are both lawyers and the UK like the USA is being destroyed by lawyer politicians. The Clintons are also both lawyers and shows the control lawyers have over American politics. Lawyers should be banned from political office as they cannot make laws they gain financially from. She talks about GENDER VIOLENCE for gays just like they use Domestic violence in secret star chamber family/civil courts and being used worldwide by corrupt lawyers and judges to steal our homes, assets and children. They have ulterior motives and act for the law societies and bar associations that allow them to fleece victims caught up in their dens of iniquity EVIL civil/family courts. No due process, No juries and NO representation. SOURCE

PROOF REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS ARE COLLABORATING TOGETHER VIDEO
REPUBLICAN VIDEO                      DEMOCRAT VIDEO               The American public have been fooled into thinking they have a democracy. When you are offered TWO parties with the same controllers that's not a democracy that's a dictatorship. FULL SCREEN VERSION REPUBLICAN VIDEO HERE FULL SCREEN VERSION DEMOCRAT VIDEO HERE

THE DECLINE AND FALL OF AMERICA VIDEO

The shocking new full length film that will change the way you look at our once great country and what America has become today. Produced by: B.A. Brooks of The United American Freedom Foundation The war on terror is really a war of terror by a small elite faction within America's political system that have taken over its policies for its own enrichment at the utter expense of ALL Americans and the rest of the world that has tolerated dictator after dictator installed by the U.S. to massacre millions to ensure the money train continues unabated. FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

WARNING OF THINGS TO COME IN SECRET TREASONOUS CONGRESSIONAL MEETINGS

The United American Freedom Foundation On March 13th 2008 there was a secret closed door meeting of The United States House Of Representatives in Washington. In the history of The United States this is only the fourth time a secret meeting was held by the house. Even though Representatives are sworn to secrecy by House Rules XVII, some of the members were so shocked, horrified, furious, and concerned about the future of America by what was revealed to them inside the secret meeting, that they have started to leak this secret information to independent news agencies around the world. The mass media said almost nothing about the secret meeting of the House, mentioning only one of the items being discussed. (The new surveillance techniques that are going to be used by the U.S. Government to watch all American citizens). The story was first released in a newspaper out of Brisbane, Australia revealing the contents of the secret U.S. Government meeting and plans for America including all of it's citizens. Shortly there after, David J. Meyer from Last Trumpet Ministries found it and made it more available for the world to see. Here is what was revealed: The imminent collapse of the U.S. Economy to occur sometime in late 2008 The imminent collapse of the U.S. Government finances sometime in mid 2009 The possibility of Civil War inside the United States as a result of the collapse The advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. Citizens" likely to move against the government The detention of those rounded up at The REX 84 Camps constructed throughout the United States The possibility of public retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses The location of safe facilities for members of Congress and their families to reside during massive civil unrest The necessary and unavoidable merger of The U.S. with Canada and Mexico establishing The North American Union The issuance of a new currency called the AMERO for all three nations as an economic solution. Except for a few hundred thousand U.S. Patriots, most Americans have no clue what has really been going on within The United States over the past 100 years, and the sad thing is that most do not want to know the truth. The further you look into the rabbit hole, the deeper it gets. Go to any currency conversion site and convert U.S. dollars to Euros so you can see for yourself the massive decline of the dollar. Look at how much money is and has been spent on the Iraq War to date, ($12 billion per month). Look at our currency and when it stopped being backed by gold. The Federal Reserve is not federal but a private bank who does not have Americans best interests at heart. We no longer have any manufacturing really based out of America and there is no way that our economy can survive this incredible strain very much longer. The IRS strong arms every American yearly with income taxes, yet there are no laws saying an income tax is to be paid. The CIA is involved in everything from global drug trafficking and covert military missions, to assassinations around the world and including U.S. Soil. Look at JFK for instance. It did not take long after JFK announced that he was going disband the CIA that he was shot in Texas. America's new StasiThe Department Of Homeland Security is and has been slowly eradicating our rights for a few years now. based organization called House Bill H.R. 1955/S-1959 was read by the senate and then sent to DHS for some reason, but is now back and sure to pass. Once passed, this bill introduced by Jane Harman (D/CA), will be the proverbial last nail hammered into every American patriots coffin. H.R. 4279 or the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 which was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, will give the government draconian powers to do just this. This legislation gives the government the power to seize property that facilitates the violation of intellectual property laws. The legislation also mandates the formation of a formal Intellectual Property Enforcement Division within the office of the Deputy Attorney General to enforce this insanity… It has been revealed that F.E.M.A. has been building internment camps all over America granting Halliburton a massive $385 million dollar construction contract to make this happen. Most of these sites only need refurbished because they are mostly closed prisons, old WW2 internment camps still intact and other facilities taken over by the government. Some people have referred to them as F.E.M.A. Death Camps where the infamous Red list/Blue Lists will be used to decide who goes where. Whether you believe that The NWO/Illuminati/Globalization is real or not, there is a lot of proof that exposes definite plans or plots by the rich, political and religious elite to bring on an era of the end times. It is almost like some individuals are trying to make bible prophecy come true in their own sick and twisted ways. Not to mention that the world only has about 10 to 15 years of drinking water left before the wars fought for oil today will be fought for water in the near future. It has been said that these powers want to depopulate the planet of over 30% of it's human inhabitants in the coming years. Examine all of the executive orders that have been signed into place allowing the president to basically become dictator in control of all government from tribal to federal in the event of any national emergency. If you did not know, In late 2006, Congress revised the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act to make it far easier for a president to declare martial law. Those changes were repealed at the end of this January as part of Public Law 110-181 (HR 4986), the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (signed into law by President Bush on January 28, 2008). Unfortunately it is not the great victory in which one might think because of the total militarization of all local and State police forces all across America. Will there be martial law? Is martial law coming soon to America? When you see law enforcement being armed with automatic weapons, bullet proof vests and riot gear in small towns that have not had a murder or crime in years, then you have to ask yourself why. The United States has more people locked up in prisons today than Russia and China combined. It comes out to one in every hundred Americans is behind bars. Our once great country that our ancestors fought and died for has become exactly the tyrants they were fighting. Fascists! When has America ever used words like Homeland? Never! If you spend a few weeks reading all the info, watching the videos and following the links at The U.A.F.F., you will then have a better understanding of what has led to The Decline And Fall Of America. Remember that Knowledge is power! Learn, look, listen, read, share, prepare, train, stock up on food and water supply for one year. Fill your pantry with non perishable foods, medicines, cooking oils, tinned meats and veggies. Flour, oats dried corn peas, beans and lentils.. Teach your self how to preserve food for storage. Check out your local potable/ drinking water supplies, non perfumed chlorine bleach is a good sterilizer for water, about 2 teaspoons full per 2 gallon bucket, stirred well and allowed to stand for at least 24 hours with a lid on it or until it no longer smells of bleach. Boiling water helps but it is not always enough to kill off the bacteria which can resist high temperatures. Americans have been warned for years of the things to come, but have blindly looked away from the truth, which has been available for all to see. There are no more excuses not to prepare for the possible future. The time to act is now before it is too late. Check The United American Free What was discussed at a closed session of the U.S. House of Representatives?

SEVEN REASONS TO INDICT NEW LABOUR

(Count One)Conspiracy to enslave UK citizens by making them unnecessarily dependent on the state (Count Two)Conspiracy to force UK nationals to claim benefits to pay higher taxes (Count Three)Incitement of poor people to pay more tax than rich people (Count Four)Solicitation of multiple tax revenues by stealth (Count Five) Attempt to obstruct, interfere, impair, impede and defeat the right of UK nationals to independence (Count Six)Conspiracy to provide material support and resources to mesmerise and anaesthetise UK citizens (Count Seven)Attempt to conceal and/or falsely represent their true status as an enemy of the people Full story here

DAVID ICKE - BIG BROTHER ,THE BIG PICTURE (HULL JULY 2008) VIDEO

Following the resignation of Tory David Davis over Britain's Big Brother state David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election and the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. The mass media who have been mocking Icke for many many years face the reality that they have now shown to be complicite with the satanic cult that is behind the global network of power and the UK's Big Brother network.The MASONIC media have at last been exposed on the internet for their part in this evil New World Order agenda . FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

ICKE BY-ELECTION NEWS CONFERENCE 2 JULY 2008 VIDEO

Due to David Davis resigning over the Big Brother stance of the UK , David Icke has put his name forward as one of the candidates for Haltomprice by-election. A press conference was held at the the Willerby Manor Hotel on Wednesday July 2nd 2008. David Ickes campaign will hold a public meeting at 1.30pm until 4pm on Sunday 6th July 2008 at the Willerby Manor Hotel Well Lane, Willerby East, Yorkshire HU10 6ER. Check http://www.davidicke.com for details FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

BROWNS FIRST YEAR AS PRIME MINISTER

Brown was an extraordinarily powerful Chancellor. Ed Balls was his long-serving adviser, he dominated the Treasury. Mr Balls was the policy gatekeeper. Civil servants knew that he was the key to influencing Mr Brown’s often slow process of decision-making. It left many officials feeling excluded, and sucked energy out of the department. So when the two departed in June last year, the head had been removed, while all the other ministers and advisers were also replaced, and much of the Brown team went to No 10. FULL STORY HERE

GOVERNMENTIUM

A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest element known to science. Its existence was proved during the hurricane, gasoline and other issues of the last year or two. The new element has been named *Governmentium*. Governmentium (Gv) Has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons, and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called mo-rons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pe-ons. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A minute amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second to take over four days to complete. Governmentium has a normal half-life of 4 years. It does not decay, however, but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places. In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganization will cause more mo-rons to become neutrons, forming iso dopes. This characteristic of mo-ron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever mo-rons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical morass. When catalyzed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium -- an element which radiates just as much energy as Governmentium since though it has only half as many peons it has twice as many mo-rons.

WANTED! THE PRIME MINISTER'S FINGERPRINTS

Privacy International and the UK's NO2ID have launched a campaign to show the dangers of the collection of fingerprints into central government databases. We are offering a reward for the first person to collect and submit the UK Prime Minister's and Home Secretary's fingerprints. Around the world, politicians are now calling for the mass fingerprinting of foreigners. The UK is relatively unique in that the Government is calling for the collection of all ten fingerprints of all citizens and residents and placing them into a single centralised database for wide access by police, and other government agencies. The Government is clear that it wants to treat all citizens as though they are criminals, having promised the police that they can trawl through the fingerprint database for forensic purposes. Following recent data breach scandals, including the loss of 25 million records on British families, we are not confident in the ability of the Government to secure this information. In fact, even the Government's advisors, including the recent report for HM Treasury by Sir James Crosby argues against the collection of unique biometrics; but the Home Office insists that it will continue along this hazardous path. As fingerprinting systems expand to enable people to secure their computers, possessions and even homes, the centralisation of biometrics will increase the risks of breaches. Building on the great work from the Chaos Computer Club in collecting the fingerprints of the German Interior Minister (see Der Spiegel and the Register articles (both links off-site)), we are campaigning to raise politicians' awareness of the dangers of collecting this type of biometric data. SOURCE

DARLING AND BROWN THE NEW WORLD ORDER PUPPETS

Hated Alistair Darling like Gordon Brown is a New World Order puppet determined to destroy the lives of everyone he touches with an evil agenda. There is a desperate acceleration of the policies required to bring about a one world government. Brown and ALL his cabinet are part of that plan.Dangerous and destructive to families living through the nightmare they are creating with fear and terror in Britain's police state as the means to force victims to conform. They can NEVER steal the spirit from the lives they have irreparably damaged. Whether it is FEAR of EVIL secretive family/civil court orders run for and on behalf of masons, hidden terrorist threats, global warming or the latest manufactured banking collapse ORDER OUT OF CHAOS is their agenda. While they create using their mass media friends to psychologically agitate the population into a fearful stance these MOBSTERS know exactly what they are doing to protect the billionaires and multi millionaires they work for. There will be no recession or depression for the mega rich who once again are creating an arena for a global world war, that is only if the people sit back and let them . Alistair Darling banned from every boozer in Britain Brown's New World Order Speech

BUSH IS ISRAEL'S NEWLY PROMOTED DEVIL PUPPET

An historic event occurred in Jerusalem this January, an event chronicled widely in Israel's newspapers but omitted entirely by America's Zionist controlled and owned press. President George W. Bush, visiting the nation of Israel, was presented with a rabbinical decree, the Scroll of Bush. The Scroll declared that he, Bush, is none other than the prophesied Gog, of the land of Magog; that is, Chief Prince of Meshech and Tubal. Even as America's economic crisis grew deeper, with hundreds of thousands losing their homes due to mortgage foreclosures, the U.S. stock market sliding south, the U.S. dollar sinking like a rock against foreign currencies, and labor statistics showing unemployment rising as more and more American workers are laid off and manufacturing sent overseas, our President George W. Bush embarked on Air Force One on an eight day trip to Israel. Yes, like bloody Roman Emperor Nero, who reportedly fiddled while Rome burned, a callous and indifferent George Bush left a desperate country and people gasping for breath to go to the Middle East and consult with his superiors—Zionist rabbinical overlords. Arriving on 666, a Prophetically Appropriate Date He arrived in Jerusalem 1/09/08, numerically translated in occult numerology as 666. On 1/11 (the 11th of January), he and Israeli Prime Minister Olmert, along with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, were taken down into the earth, inside Zedekiah's Cave, for a clandestine ritual and black mass conducted by the Grand Master of Israel's Freemasons. The same day, Bush visited Yad Vashem, Israel's version of the Holocaust Museum, where he stayed exactly 90 minutes, a number again translating into 666. While in Jerusalem, President Bush and Prime Minister Olmert met with the press and referred to several key dates approaching. March 20th would signal the Jewish holy day of Purim, commemorating the mass murder and genocide by the Jews of more than 75,000 Gentile "enemies" of Persia (Iran) in the days of the Jews' Queen Esther. On May 8, Israel celebrates its 60th anniversary. Finally, President Bush predicted that by the end of his term in 2009 (2x9=18, translating again, into that number 666), there will be a peace treaty between the Palestinians and the Israelis. The treaty will insure that the Palestinians will forever be squeezed into their pitiful, apartheid, poverty-stricken ghettos, while the victorious Jews enjoy the fruits of their crimes, luxuriously living in an enlarged, Greater Israel. But those things were not the most significant that happened during Bush's historic visit. No, that occurred on the third day when, at a banquet, President Bush was presented with the Scroll of Bush, a document made out on ancient parchment and signed by the three most spiritually prominent Jews on planet earth: Rabbi Adan Steinzaltz, High Priest of the Sanhedrin Rabbi Chaim Reichman, Chief Rabbi of the Holy Temple Dr. Gadi Schel, Chief Representative of The New Jewish Congress FULL ARTICLE HERE

TAX PAYERS ALLIANCE

You will see lots of comments from Britain's media on groups like the Tax Payers Alliance. Further investigations reveal an extreme right wing conservative strategy masquerading as a group, quoted regularly in the mass media, and another platform for the aristocracy to promote the massive inequalities our British media guard so dearly. Whenever the BBC or any other national media quote groups ,you soon find out they are all part of the same MOB.Usually self appointed upper class twits who fill Westminister with inbreeds who would not look out of place at a Gestapo conference.British media are forever hiding their right wing influences behind groups that disguise the true nature of their allegiances. Britain's extreme right wing press are fully responsible for promoting the massive inequality that leads to horrendous attacks on the poorest sections of British society.That while propping up the richest dynasty in the world and all their spokespersons indoctrinated into the many groups our media feed off and suggest they speak for the majority as a whole.That is so far from the truth. We are being bamboozled daily in Britain's national media by a multi-tier system of propaganda. All of it caters primarily for the self appointed aristocracy and their hand picked controllers who infest our political,legal and policing world via masonic indoctrinated goffers.Gordon Brown only one example of the hand picked lackeys that are doing so much harm to the ordinary citizen of the UK while promoting Browns New World Order. We are at a dangerous crossroads in the history of the UK.The media via the internet has been shown to be complicit in the most horrendous cover up of the masonic powers that persecute activists fighting for the massive changes required to turn Britain into a place of civility and a free society that does not use surveillance to control its population.We are in for turbulent times ahead as that media continues to provide the lies and deceit necessary for the long term plans to further enslave the UK. That we will not allow to happen.We are a growing body of victims of despicable acts of terror against our people ,covered up by that mass media and continues every day in the most subtle and devious ways. Starting in our evil civil court system and all other arms of the law that remain as feudal as in the middle ages, with hand picked lackeys of the state destroying victims lives on a daily basis.THAT mass media can no longer continue the lies indefinitely as even their reporters are now realising their BOSSES and OWNERS have ulterior motives for bullying them into complying with the propaganda they pump out to paint an illusion that is so far removed from what is really going on in the UK. A SINISTER AND EVIL bully boy network that abuses our citizens daily in the utter greed it operates under. All of it protected by a complicit media who in time will get their day for the enormous harm they have turned a blind eye to.Those investigative reporters they trundle on every now and again to utter their bile are the NWO spies who gather information ,not to expose the sinister hidden hand that does so much harm but to provide distractions to the real TRUTH of why British people are being utterly shafted by a few self appointed THUGS disguised in their masonic robes and regalia.Who are ALL members of a SATANIC CULT that former 90th degree mason Bill Schnoebelen has exposed on the internet and all its EVIL tentacles of power. Tax Payers Alliance Taxpayers Alliance are an arm of the tory toffs

POLITICAL JOKERS
CLICK ON PICS TO ENLARGE

TOP TEN SIGNS YOUR GOVERNMENT MAY BE GOING FASCIST VIDEO

A humorous video addressing the issues of extreme right wing governments in the UK and USA taking over control of the world using weapons of mass destruction. Pointing the finger away from the very fascists who are exerting enormous power through initiating wars on an unseen enemy the "TERRORISTS". All dictators use hidden ENEMIES to exert power and control over their population and only outright resistance can stop their enforced laws leading to tyranny.Britain and America have been going down this New World Order totalitarian state for a LONG time thanks to the high level masons embedded in EVERY area of life.

WHERE DOES HILLARY GET HER FLAGS FROM?

Comparing the original stars and stripes with the one Hillary Clinton is using in her presidential campaign shows a quite distinct difference.We have already asked why the European Union flag has the same stars as the US flag.But this latest one is even more disturbing .Clinton's flag quite clearly shows the stars upside down and a very different type of image than the original. The five pointed star in that configuration is based on satanism and NOT the first time the CLINTON's have proudly professed their satanic leanings .Including their regular hand signs and Bill's all seeing eye dinner jacket.With so many bodies in the Clinton closet we are amazed she has the audacity to even stand for President and some American's think she is a possible candidate.

ICKE EXPOSES BUSH SNR ON BBC SHOW

Icke exposes Bush Snr on BBC show Brand was horrified at claims made by Icke COMIC Russell Brand fears he has made an enemy of President Bush after outrageous comments on his radio show. Russell, 32, was horrified when oddball David Icke, 55, claimed the US President’s father was a “notorious paedo”. Brand was so worried by the live comments, he tried to ridicule them, saying they were “bonkers” and “not the view of the BBC”. But when Icke offered to send him proof of the allegations against George Bush Snr, 83, Brand hastily added: “Don’t send it on my computer.” A source at Brand’s late Saturday night Radio 2 show said: “Russell was absolutely horrified when Icke came out with the stuff about Bush live on air. He said afterwards he had enough problems without making enemies of the most powerful family on the planet. “Russell was really worried there would be a US backlash.” Icke, who claims to be the son of God, insists he has researched the Bush family, including current US leader George W Bush, 61, and has proof the former President abuses children. Icke said: “He’s a notorious paedo, father George Bush.” A spokesman for the BBC said: “We have had no complaints.” SOURCE

EVIL PURNELL NEW RUTHLESS DWP MINISTER

Now we have got rid of CROOKED Hain we have another evil fascist PURNELL who is immediately attacking the poorest sections of British society. That despite having ONE of the biggest expenses claims in Parliament of more than £120,000 in 2004,yet he thinks the poorest in the UK require even more fascist changes to the already crooked regime that masquerades at the Department of Works and Pensions. Brown and his new cabinet are even more right wing than when Blair was in power and it is becoming clear Britain is moving to a extreme right wing dictatorship with only an illusion of democracy hiding the fascists that have taken over the running of the UK. Most ,if not all of them ,members of the satanic club that hand picked them to do the dirty on the most vulnerable members of British Society. FASCIST PURNELL'S BIOG Purnell to force cancer patients and the disabled into work after they pay years of National Insurance to cover their illness's Independent Watchdog for the Department for Work and Pensions

THAT GOVERNMENT SHOULD BUTT OUT

These things I believe: That government should butt out. That freedom is our most precious commodity and if we are not eternally vigilant, government will take it all away. That individual freedom demands individual responsibility. That government is not a necessary good but an unavoidable evil. That the executive branch has grown too strong, the judicial branch too arrogant and the legislative branch too stupid. That political parties have become close to meaningless. That government should work to insure the rights of the individual,not plot to take them away. That government should provide for the national defense and work to insure domestic tranquillity. That foreign trade should be fair rather than free. That America should be wary of foreign entanglements. That the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. That guns do more than protect us from criminals; more importantly, they protect us from the ongoing threat of government. That states are the bulwark of our freedom. That states should have the right to secede from the Union. That once a year we should hang someone in government as an example to his fellows." - - Lyn Nofziger

PROGRAMMER EXPOSES 2000 USA ELECTION RIGGED VIDEO

FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE Clinton E. Curtis, ex-programmer tells all during a Congressional hearing on voting fraud. In October 2000, Curtis was asked by Tom Feeney (R), then Speaker of the House in Florida, to write a computer program that would render electronic voting fraud undetectable. Curtis did just that. He informs the hearing how he was asked to create secret code to rig America's 2000 election. Bush is in the WHITE HOUSE from the fraudulent misuse of rigged voting machines.

DEMOCRACY

Democracy is NOT about being forced to vote every four years or so for masonic placemen heavily promoted by masonic press barons. Democracy is that EVERY new change in legislation can be tested in our courts by a jury of our peers. Not MASONIC judges distorting and ignoring laws that instead of being set in STONE ,at least for the judicial mobsters ,are written in sand that can be easily blown away when the circumstances suit the fleecing of any victim that dares enter their masonic based court structure. Democracy in the UK has been usurped by lawyers who take up political roles that a true democracy would never allow.Due to the separation of powers of a government those who enforce legislation should NEVER make them. That is as ridiculous as employing an arsonist to do the job of a fireman. Scotland in the 90's obtained devolved government.Few Scots realise the godfather of devolution Labour MP Donald Dewar, now deceased,was a lawyer who almost single handedly wrote the devolution settlement .Those laws allowed almost free rein to MSP's. He created legislation that allowed lawyers to enter parliament as MSP's and then carry on working in their legal DAY job fleecing thousands of victims in Scotlands corrupt civil courts,only to sign back in just before 5pm to collect their large MSP salaries and expenses. It would be a struggle for a Tesco employee to take up employment with Sainsbury's and sign in for a days work then head out the door to Sainsbury to do a days shift there appearing just before stopping time to sign out . This is precisely what lawyers, who should NEVER be making laws ,are doing at the Scottish Parliament with little or no scrutiny of what TIME they are spending with their constituents .One Labour MSP/Lawyer Gordon Jackson was named CRACKERJACK as he regularly appeared at 5pm ,the time that show used to be screened on the BBC,to ensure he collected another days pay for his NON appearance in the Scottish Parliament . What we have seen over the last decade or more is lawyers like BLAIR and his wife,DARLING and HARMAN sitting in Westminster as MP's and creating more and more power for the Law Society's and courts they have been part of for so long.They show complete allegiance as political pawns to the legal goons who are in fact destroying the very fabric of British Society for their own financial gain.Never have so many paper shufflers created so much wealth for themselves from OTHER PEOPLES hard work.A single lawyer before a solitary judge has more fire power than a 1,000 gunmen as at the stroke of a masonic judges pen your life can be taken from you without any form of redress. The police may attempt to respond to gunmen stealing assets however they would NEVER investigate the criminal collusion that leads to billions of pounds of land,business and property being stolen by the crooks running our secretive star chamber civil courts for their own financial gain. The lords and ladies and their legal minions are all creating massive land and property portfolio's through third party purchases of illegally repossessed land,property and business's .The lawyer MP's and MSP's are creating new laws that make those repossessions quicker and simpler to steal through the utter distortions and corruption that is possible due to self serving legal parasites that dominate our legal and political process. THAT WE MUST CONTINUE TO FIGHT AND EXPOSE THE CROOKS BEHIND THESE SCAMS

ZIONIST MONEY PROPPING UP NEW LABOUR

David Martin Abrahams (born Newcastle upon Tyne, 13 November 1944, although he reports himself as being 10 years younger) is a British property developer, notable as a donor to the British Labour Party. He donated anonymously through third parties in breach of British law on party political donations, which gave rise to a political scandal in the UK in November 2007 . He lives in a £900,000 converted family home in Gosforth, Newcastle Born into a wealthy Jewish family, Abrahams' father Bennie Abrahams was a Labour councillor for the Monkchester ward of Newcastle City Council, and in 1981/2 Lord Mayor of Newcastle. He had been a member of Labour Friends of Israel although was thrown out for unacceptable behaviour by its chairman Jonathan Mendelsohn in 2003 SOURCE David Abrahams hints at frequent meetings with PM

MAN HATING HARMAN'S SLOW DEATH

The Stalinist's Apprentice, an experimental drama starring Gordon Brown as the Stalinist and Harriet Harman as his apprentice, continues to play to packed houses at Westminster. In this haunting contemporary version, instead of a flood of water we have a flood of dodgy political donations which poor Miss Harman has no idea how to stop. She cannot think of the magic formula (between you and me it is "no thanks") which is needed to prevent David Abrahams from sending her a cheque for £5,000 in the name of Janet Kidd. The Tories think Miss Harman is useless. And in a savage, modern twist Mr Brown thinks she is useless too, and refuses to help her when she gets into difficulty. The trouble is that Mr Brown never wanted Miss Harman to be his apprentice in the first place: to his anger and surprise, she won the election to be his deputy by the narrowest margin. SOURCE Harman stands firm as police are called in to investigate ‘secret donor’ allegations Zionist money propping up NEW Labour

HAIN THE WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING

Peter Hain smooth looker and talker hides another one of Brown's dangerous henchmen.He is the Minister of Works and Pensions and has been attacking the poorest part of society since taking up his post .That is despite new revelations that he is now caught up in the criminally inept donations scandal that is bringing the whole of Brown's cabinet into disrepute. The Government faced fresh embarrassment last night after Work and Pensions Secretary Peter Hain admitted that he failed to register a £5,000 donation to his deputy leadership campaign by Labour's new chief fund raiser. Mr Hain blamed an "administrative error" for the failure to inform the Electoral Commission of the donation by Jon Mendelsohn. "In the light of recent events, it has come to my attention that a donation from Jon Mendelsohn to my deputy leadership campaign was mistakenly not registered with the Electoral Commission," Mr Hain said in a statement. SOURCE Hain becomes embroiled in donor allegations Zionist money propping up NEW Labour

BUSH'S MASONIC AMERICAN DREAM IS A NIGHTMARE

Salt Lake City Mayor: Draw Your Line In the Sand Address by Mayor Ross C. “Rocky” Anderson Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah’s entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: “You have failed us miserably and we won’t take it any more.” “While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss.” “You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law.” “You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation’s history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder.” “We are here to tell you: We won’t take it any more!” “You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation’s treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law.” “Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false ‘patriotism,’ our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before. It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense – when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling – and disgraceful. What part of “Thou shalt not kill” do you not understand? What part of the “Golden rule” do you not understand? What part of “be honest,” “be responsible,” and “be accountable” don’t you understand? What part of “Blessed are the peacekeepers” do you not understand? Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, ‘We won’t take it any more!’ ” “As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation’s values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places – for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world.” MORE HERE

LUNATIC BROWN AND HIS MAD SCHEMES TO FURTHER ERODE OUR FREEDOMS

We all thought Blair was a nutter but Brown, the latest New World Order goon, is even madder. The latest headlines across the UK are Brown's fortress Britain.He is showing all the signs of a lunatic fascist who thinks he can DICTATE whatever he wants to remove our rights and freedoms,but most importantly completely undermining our private and personal affairs.Brown and his mad hatter ministers are showing signs of deranged war mongers working for their masonic backers to control us using ever increasing draconian measures. The threat of terrorism is a constant excuse for oppressing us and building a surveillance society that is monitoring our every move and action from cradle to grave, but ONLY if we let them.They are aware of the massive resistance growing across the internet ,noticable by emails taking longer and longer to arrive.Electronic communications are being diverted via the UK governments listening stations before forwarding or disappearing.What should be an instant means of communicating is now becoming even less reliable than surface mail. BROWN and his masonic NWO agenda cannot and will NOT get away with these plans.All he is doing is massively increasing the resistance to a prime minister showing serious signs of megalomania and Brown has always had a DARK side to his personality now clearly visible since his self promotion ,well at least for the short term, to Prime minister.He will be as dispensable as his former partner in crime Blair. But his short time in office ,along with his nutty ministers ,are being used to further the masonic hold in Britain and will be short lived , replaced by another NWO goon like Cameron to continue the ROT of an ever increasing fascist state the masons are funding and behind in their New World Order plans. Random bag searches for rail passengers in Brown's Fortress Britain LUNATIC BROWN AND HIS MAD SCHEMES TO FURTHER ERODE OUR FREEDOMS Fortress Britain as passengers forced to answer 53 questions in airport inquisition

BRITAIN'S FLAWED DEMOCRACY

Today is the state opening of Parliament.The mass media continue to promote this illusion.An illusion that suggests British citizens NOT SUBJECTS are electing MP's to act in their best interests. Most ,if not all of this pomp and ceremony ,with all their robes and regalia is a front for the masons disguised as right honorable gentlemen and who are place men for the royalist establishment agenda that has dominated Britain for centuries . There is NOTHING GREAT about Britain it has always been a cesspit of corruption with hand picked lackeys of the establishment given power ,not through democracy ,but through patronage and swearing of devil worshipping oaths that ensures their loyalty to the richest dynasty in the world.A clever distortion of the truth to suggest the British public have a vote on who runs this country.That would only be the case if those we are forced time and again to vote for were in fact independent of a masonic machine that ensures the establishment continue to pull the strings behind the scenes. Britain's mass media have aided and abetted the appalling illusion of the freedoms we are supposed to have .When Britain is the most heavily monitored race on earth and ensures anyone who attempts to overthrow the ruling despots are quickly removed to psychiatric wards and never seen again.Our gun controls ensure ONLY the rich establishment have the weapons that protects their wealth obtained through the rape and pillage of the world via the old British Empire,that empire still alive and well under other guises like the COMMONWEALTH. Interesting name ,as to exactly what wealth is COMMON ? and who exactly gains from that wealth? No matter what our media describe this farce as, it extends the despotic control of Britain that will forever be locked into until the sheeples are re-educated on the lies that have been repeated endlessly to brainwash the public into submitting to this dictatorial monster.

BRITAIN'S MEDIA ELECTION FARCE

Most of the British public must be getting wise to the UK media election farce. Without a definite date we are being bombarded already with the same two horse(donkey) race.Brown's Labour and Camerons Tories,you wouldn't even guess there are other parties as we are bombarded endlessly with the same two party lies and deceit the media have been brainwashing the UK population with for eons. Brown is a New World Order clone and his speeches time and again have referred to that very agenda.Cameron is a relatively young old etonian who has been indoctrinated into the same establishment mind set found in most of the fee paying schools across Britain.Eton is the closest to the House of Windsor and creates a much more rigid royalist agenda and produces many of Britain's legal and political goons who are there primarily as SAFE hands,or at least safe for the illuminati who fund their rise to power and NOTHING AT ALL to do with democracy. Britain has been living under a masonic fascist illusion ONLY because our media promote and support the two horse race that masquerades as some form of democracy.British people forced into voting for the same pair of donkeys have had to tolerate a massive bully boy network that Cameron and Brown both support.We have tyranny in our courts with masonic judges,tyranny in our councils run by masons,tyranny in government with most of the civil service masons,tyranny in our police with most, if not all , chief constables part of the satanic cult that completely engulfs the UK in an evil empire of wealth,power and privilege.But only for the few who own 90% or more of Britain's wealth ,land and properties due to a MASONIC power structure promoted by a sinister media network brainwashing the public into believing we have a democracy .

GORDON BROWN ILLUMINATI PUPPET

Blairs sidekick Gordon Brown now Prime Minister caught at the CBI conference uttering the same illuminati chant that Bush junior and senior have been spouting for years The New World Order. It may be part of Browns rite of passage that he is required to use that phrase before an exclusive audience of masonic businessmen before he is giving the nod and wink to go onto to the highest office in the land. He also ,despite his record for years as chancellor of the exchequer ,seems to want to distance himself from the appalling mess of the British economy and the massive rise in debts caused primarily by forcing salaries down and allowing a debt mountain to compensate for the failures to ensure British workers are properly recompensed.

BROWN'S REAL BULLY BOY TACTICS OVER PENSIONS

Brown like Blair has surrounded himself with BULLY BOYS.The usual get tough speeches show they are determined to keep the MASSIVE divide between the haves and have not's Blair created to fund his ego. Brown as chancellor has been wholly responsible for the inequality gap widening with rich city boys paying little or no taxes due to Browns efforts to help the rich at the enormous expense of the poor and average joe. Darling,Alexander and Miliband are the next Blunkett,Clarke and Reid they are the same mind set that turned Labour into a party who make even Conservative policies seem left wing.Darling wouldn't look out of place heading the Gestapo, he is a ruthless cold calculated lawyer who has been behind much of Blair's surveillance society. It should be the people monitoring Darling not the other way around,give this lot time to settle in and we will see more of the crazy plans they have to drive us further into a fascist state. Brown betrays the 'people' he should help Ruthless UK government sent 10,000 kids to abuse in Australia

BLAIR AND BROWN'S LEGACY IS A NATION ENGULFED IN DEBT

Brown is now paying the cost of an artificially created economy founded on debt not prosperity. Only judges ,banks and lawyers are making a killing from debt recovery and repossessions.We have seen an utter decline in living standards year on year during the whole of Blair and Browns incompetent era. They have played right into the banks hands who are creating money out of thin air.No longer producing coins of value ,then printing money that is valueless ,now they create invisible money from plastic. The value of that money isn't worth the price of the plastic .Property is a most devious way, those who set you up to steal your assets ,ensure you are encouraged to pump enormous sums into bricks and mortar as when they come to steal your assets you cannot,like with diamonds and gold, stuff them in a bag and bugger off .You are left with what assets you have tied up in an unmovable and artificially created bank that in time ALL of us will face the bailiffs at the door to make us homeless and penniless.There are a growing army of victims who may not have material wealth but the spiritual strength to ensure the crooks cannot and will not get away with their crimes indefinitely. We hope this group has some of the KEY players that will play a part in its downfall .That we have never had any doubt will in time fall. Devious individuals that have been used as place men for the masonic dynasty that controls our country have been getting away with murder for far to long.They are now under the enormous spotlight of the internet were ALL OF THE WORLD can finally see the true picture of what our mass media has hidden from us for so long. They are the accomplices in the crime wave of the masonic controllers.The 10% of British traitors who have acquired 90% of Britain's wealth through masonic skullduggery using fraud and corruption in our legal and political systems and against all our citizens. It is time to recover what they have stolen from us all FULL ARTICLE HERE

WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED SAYS BROWN

So much for all New Labours high tech CCTV systems used as an excuse to stop threats when in fact it does nothing of the kind. It gives NWO clone Gordon Brown and his henchmen the excuse to crank up the marshall law that is by the day taking our rights and freedoms away. One look at Iraq shows that despite armies out on the streets and curfews and marshall law even that cant stop retaliation against the US/UK illegal war .It is a nonsense that the long suffering public have had to tolerate ever increasing tightening of our ability to go about our business without CCTV following us everywhere.Time and again it has been proven ,as in these recent cases, that monitoring will not deter anyone determined to carry out an attack. When are the companies supplying these ever expanding systems going to reach saturation and what is their next level of monitoring ? We will all end up like being in the Big Brother house surrounded by government spy cameras. Also the UK have very short memories .During the last war when Hitler was trying to take over Europe Britain had SAS inside Germany trying to thwart his attempts by sabotaging Germany and its people. Nobody would disagree that was essential to protect Britain. Britain and the USA committed the same by attacking a country that had not threatened both countries but had large reserves of mineral wealth Bush was desperate to get hold off.When The Middle east see the devastation they have caused it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that they will do the same as any country that has been invaded illegally and try and do what our SAS did in germany to retaliate. We may not like the means they are using to carry that out but a few cars with the most antiquated method of causing damage PALES alongside the American shock and awe tactics used against innocent Iraqi civilians when cruise missiles were winding their way down Baghdad streets. You cannot attack someone without expecting repercussions.The media time and again resort to using the same propaganda to distort how the UK and USA have made enemies of those who had been going about their lives and seeing those lives destroyed using the most advanced military might in the world.What they are doing is throwing back at us what little they have to inflict some of the same damage that the USA and UK have done to Iraq. No amount of media, suggesting it is a one sided terrorist act, when Bush and Blair have been committing the same atrocities for years supposedly to remove Saddam .The ordinary people of Iraq have paid a heavy price to remove that ONE MAN. FULL ARTICLE HERE

WORKHOUSE BRITAIN

HARRIET HATEMEN WINS LABOUR DEPUTY LEADERSHIP

QUOTE "Labour is and must remain the party of the family. I have always tried to be a champion for women and as deputy leader that is what I will do," she said. Harmans view of FAMILY is one parent preferably female.She is one of the most evil purveyors of destroying families and hates all things connected with men.An extreme radical feminist and lawyer who's legal buddies are raking it in with family law. FULL ARTICLE HERE

ALISTAIR DARLING DANGERMAN AND HIGH RANKING MASON
Alistair Darling is maybe the most dangerous MP this country has ever seen. He is a lawyer and has his nose in every big brother scheme NEW labour has drummed up.An EVIL EVIL BASTARD.He heads the attempts to remove MP's from Freedom of Information requests to protect his own devious ass. FULL ARTICLE HERE Darling a grey but DANGEROUS man DANGEROUS Darling tipped for the Treasury