MASONIC COP MURDERS,VIOLENCE,INTIMIDATION AND PERSECUTION

COPS HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA
MASONIC COPS AGENDA

COPS EXPERIMENT WITH BLINDING DAZER LASER VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • G20 COP MURDERER HAD BEEN REHIRED BY MET DESPITE DISCIPLINE FEARS

    FOR FAR TO LONG THE MASONS CONTROLLING BRITAIN'S POLICE STATE HAVE BEEN COVERING EACH OTHERS ASS EVEN WHEN THEY MURDER INNOCENT VICTIMS OF THEIR BRUTALITY

    The Met was today under growing pressure to explain why the police officer who pushed over Ian Tomlinson was re-employed by the force despite questions over his disciplinary record.

    Pc Simon Harwood, 43, retired from the Met a decade ago on ill health grounds while facing a misconduct hearing for an alleged road rage incident. But despite his background, he was taken back by the Met in 2004 and later given a place in the force's controversial Territorial Support Group unit.

    The revelations prompted new criticism following anger over yesterday's announcement by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, that no charges would be brought over newspaper vendor Mr Tomlinson's death. They came as a series of other new disclosures raised further serious questions about the case. They included: The revelation that the Met reported concerns about the competence of Dr Freddy Patel, the first pathologist to examine Mr Tomlinson, to the Home Office in 2004, but that he was given only "words of advice".

    A claim by the second pathologist to examine Mr Tomlinson that there was enough evidence to bring a charge of causing actual bodily harm. The biggest questions today, however, were over the Met's decision to re-hire Pc Harwood, who has been suspended since coming forward to admit that he was the officer captured on video striking Mr Tomlinson with a baton and pushing him to the ground during the G20 protests on April 1 last year. The officer was working for the Met during the 1990s when he was accused of a road rage incident while off duty, but retired on health grounds. He then rejoined the force as a civilian computer worker, before moving to Surrey Police as a Pc after passing a medical and vetting process, during which it is understood that he made a full disclosure of his background. He moved back to the Met in November 2004.

    Green politician Jenny Jones, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, said today: "This officer clearly resigned so that he did not have to face a disciplinary charge it is also unacceptable that the Met took him back on." Dr Nat Cary, the second pathologist in the case, said today that Mr Tomlinson's injuries were severe enough to bring a charge of actual bodily harm. "He sustained quite a large area of bruising," he said. "Such injuries are consistent with a baton strike."

  • SOURCE
  • Masonic cops
  • G20 COP MURDERER FREE OF CHARGES THANKS TO MASONIC CROWN LACKEYS VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • G20: COP WHO STRUCK IAN TOMLINSON FACED TWO PREVIOUS AGGRESSION INQUIRIES

    Pc Simon Harwood, the police officer who struck Ian Tomlinson minutes before he died, was previously investigated twice over his alleged aggressive behaviour.

    Although it has been decided he will not face criminal charges for striking Tomlinson it has been disclosed that the police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission, backed a prosecution for manslaughter. Pc Harwood left the Metropolitan Police a decade ago amid controversy over an alleged off-duty road rage incident, then got a job with Surrey Police, where he was accused of using excessive force. He could now face disciplinary charges over the death of Mr Tomlinson, and could also be the subject of an internal investigation by the Met into how he was allowed to rejoin the force despite having an unresolved disciplinary matter on his record.

    The married 43 year-old had been due to face a misconduct hearing over the alleged road rage incident, understood to have happened in the late 1990s, but instead retired on medical grounds. A few years later, the father of two rejoined the Met as a civilian computer worker before applying to Surrey Police for a job as a police constable in May 2003. A spokesman for Surrey Police said: “He applied to become a Pc with us in 2003. Following our vetting procedure, liaising with the Met Police and passing a medical examination, he was accepted. “He was full and frank about his history.

    “Surrey Police had no concerns at the time and he followed the standard procedure for everybody.” Pc Harwood spent a year and half working in Surrey before applying to be transferred back to the Met in the autumn of 2004. However, during his time at Surrey he faced a complaint about his alleged behaviour while on duty. The force spokesman said: “There was a thorough internal investigation and the claim was subsequently found to be unsubstantiated and no further action was taken.” Pc Harwood returned to the Met in November 2004, but it is unclear whether the force was aware of the previous misconduct procedure, or whether there had been a failure in its vetting process.

    By the time of the G20 protests last year, Pc Harwood was working with the Met’s territorial support group (TSG), which provides an immediate response to spontaneous disorder anywhere in London. Dressed in a bright yellow reflective jacket, black uniform and helmet, Pc Harwood’s identity number was covered up and he had a scarf across the lower part of his face. The Crown Prosecution Service’s report said that at 7.15pm on April 1, a police dog handler put out his hand to move Mr Tomlinson away and a police dog bit him on his leg. Mr Tomlinson did not react to the bite, and it was then that Pc Harwood moved in and shoved him to the ground.

    Pc Harwood was questioned on suspicion of manslaughter two weeks after Mr Tomlinson’s death, and has been suspended ever since, spending his time at home in Carshalton, Surrey, where he lives with his wife Helen, a GP surgery manager, and their two young sons. A second pathologist, Nat Cary, has challenged the CPS decision to drop criminal charges saying Tomlinson suffered injuries that would support an acutal bodily harm (ABH) charge. Mr Cary said the injuries were "not relatively minor" and that they were "consistent with a baton strike". A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police declined to comment on the force’s decision to re-employ Pc Harwood in 2004.

  • SOURCE
  • Advice to charge cop over G20 Tomlinson death ignored
  • G20 COP ESCAPES CHARGES OVER DEATH OF IAN TOMLINSON
    AS WE'VE KNOWN FOR A VERY LONG TIME BRITAIN'S MASONIC COPS ARE GETTING AWAY WITH ABSOLUTE MURDER WITH ANOTHER OUTRAGEOUS DECISION BY THE CROWN LACKEYS PROTECTING A POLICE STATE.

    G20 policeman escapes charges over news vendor Ian Tomlinson's death during protests A policeman has escaped charges over the death of a news vendor caught up in the G20 protests, it was announced today. The Crown Prosecution Service ruled he would not be tried for manslaughter because of the results of the first post-mortem examination on Ian Tomlinson, conducted by Dr Freddy Patel.

    His findings were contrary to other medical evidence, which meant securing a conviction would be too difficult. Dr Patel, who has previously been disciplined by the General Medical Council and is now being investigated again, decided Mr Tomlinson died of a heart attack.

    However, two further post-mortems by different experts ruled the 47-year-old father-of-nine died because of internal bleeding. The CPS decided Dr Patel's conclusion would undermine any case brought against the officer and ruled he could not be prosecuted.

    MR TOMLINSON'S SON: 'It's outrageous. We feel like it was not a full investigation from the beginning. It's a big cover-up. They knew that if they dragged this out long enough, they would avoid charges. They knew just what they were doing. They've pulled us through a hedge backwards'

    Assault charges also had to be ruled out because of the first post-mortem and a lesser common assault charge was impossible because it has a six-month time limit. Misconduct in public office was considered but dismissed by prosecutors because of legal precedents, meaning the police officer will face no criminal action. Mr Tomlinson's family - who were at CPS headquarters for the ruling - accused police of a 'cover-up' and vowed to keep pressing for justice.

    His son Paul King said: 'Words can't describe how we feel, we feel very let down, very disappointed... You haven't heard the last of us yet.' Calling of the officer to be 'named and shamed', he added: 'It's outrageous. We feel like it was not a full investigation from the beginning. It's a big cover-up.' 'They knew that if they dragged this out long enough, they would avoid charges. They knew just what they were doing. They've pulled us through a hedge backwards - now we have to go on living our lives.'

    The Tomlinson family's solicitor Jules Carey also expressed disgust. 'Clearly it is a disgraceful decision,' he said. He added: 'The issue today is the failure of the CPS. It's unbelievable, there needs to be an inquiry.' Asked what she will do now, Mr Tomlinson's widow Julia said: 'What do you expect us to do? What can we do?'

    Mr Tomlinson, a heavy drinker, died on April 1 amid the G20 protests near the Bank of England. He was not a protester and lived nearby in a hostel for the homeless. He was bitten by a police dog shortly before his clash with the riot officer - who hit him with a baton and then pushed him to the ground. He managed to struggle upright with the help of onlookers but collapsed and died at 7.30pm that night.

    The attack, which was caught on camera, was at the centre of a storm of criticism about how the demonstrations were policed. Dr Patel later concluded he had died of a heart attack despite finding a 'substantial amount of blood' in his abdominal cavity. His 'provisional' conclusion was that Mr Tomlinson died of 'coronary artery disease' and he said he had heart and liver diseases.

    Concerned about the accuracy of the findings, both the family and the IPCC asked for a second post-mortem to be carried out by the widely-respected Dr Nat Cary. He found died of internal bleeding as a result of blunt force trauma, in combination with cirrhosis of the liver. A third examination, conducted on behalf of the officer, agreed with the findings of the second post-mortem.

    Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer said there was a 'sharp disagreement' between the medical experts which was 'irreconcilable'. This would make prosecution 'very difficult', he insisted.

    'The CPS would simply not be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that there was a causal link between Mr Tomlinson's death and the alleged assault upon him,' he announced this morning. 'That being the case, there is no realistic prospect of a conviction for unlawful act manslaughter.' Dr Patel has been under investigation by the GMC since 2005 over four bungled post-mortems.

    Some 26 charges against him of sub-standard practice are being looked at and he could be struck off if they are substantiated. He became a private pathologist on the Home Office register in the 1990s but was suspended from the list last summer. The officer, a member of the Metropolitan Police's Territorial Support Group, was suspended from duty throughout the investigation.

    He could still face disciplinary action once the IPCC report is passed to the Met. The case could also be revisited by prosecutors after an inquest. The official police version of events on April 1 initially claimed Mr Tomlinson's death had nothing to do with the policing of the protest. After his collapse, Scotland Yard issued a statement describing how officers trying to help him were pelted with bottles by protesters.

    On April 3, the City of London police said he had died of a heart attack. But on April 7 video footage taken by a New York fund manager emerged which showed him being hit on the legs with a baton and being shoved aggressively to the ground at 7.20pm. The police constable who pushed him whose shoulder identification number appears to be missing in the film - was suspended from duty on April 9. He was questioned on suspicion of manslaughter on April 17.

    The Independent Police Complaints Commission completed its criminal inquiry last August and handed over a file of evidence to the CPS for them to consider charges. More than 40 IPCC investigators visisted 190 premises in the search for CCTV of the incident and footage was recovered from more than 220 cameras. A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: 'Our thoughts remain with the family of Ian Tomlinson and those affected by his death. 'It is only right that the circumstances of Ian Tomlinson's death have been independently investigated.

    'We have co-operated fully with the IPCC's investigation so that the facts of what happened that day can be established. 'There will, of course, be an inquest where the facts will be heard publicly. This is important for the family of Ian Tomlinson as well as Met officers and Londoners. 'We now await the IPCC's investigation report before being able to carefully consider appropriate misconduct proceedings.' Green politician Jenny Jones, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, said today: 'I hope at the least the police are going to hold him to account. Misconduct alone is not really enough.'

    DOUBTS OVER THE DOCTOR BEHIND POST MORTEM

    Concerns have long been held by some police officers over the Home Office accredited pathologist who conducted Ian Tomlinson's initial post-mortem examination. Dr Freddy Patel, who first qualified as a doctor in Zambia, has previously been reprimanded by the General Medical Council. The pathologist was disciplined ten years ago for releasing medical details of a man who died in police custody outside an inquest hearing.

    He told reporters that the victim, Roger Sylvester, was a user of crack cocaine. That claim devastated Mr Sylvester's family who contested that he had used the drug. As a result, Dr Patel was formally reprimanded by the General Medical Council. In a second case, in 2002, police dropped a criminal investigation after he gave his opinion that a 38-year-old woman, Sally White, had died of natural causes. Her body had been found locked in the bedroom of a flat of Anthony Hardy

    He went on to kill two women and dump their body parts in bin bags in Camden, North London, during a murderous spree after Christmas 2002. Hardy later pleaded guilty to Miss White's murder. He is serving life in jail after he was convicted of three murders at the Old Bailey in 2003. The expert is now facing fresh claims that he bungled four post-mortems between 2002 and 2004. The GMC is examining 26 charges of sub-standard practice.

    He is accused of giving questionable verdicts on the causes of deaths, several of which later turned out to be suspicious and has been under investigation since 2005. He was suspended from the register last summer and barred from undertaking post-mortems in suspicious deaths.

  • SOURCE
  • Family fury as police escape charges over Ian Tomlinson's G20 death
  • COP BLASTS INNOCENT MAN IN GROIN WITH 50,000 VOLT TASER 'BY ACCIDENT'
    peter cox A man was shot in the groin with a 50,000 volt Taser gun by police who wrongly believed he had been driving without insurance.

    Peter Cox was given the electric shock after he climbed out of his BMW to talk to officers who had been following him. He had a brief conversation with them but suddenly collapsed to the ground in agony when one of the policemen discharged the weapon. Yesterday Mr Cox, 49, said he was considering legal action against the force after it said the gun had been fired accidentally. In addition, it later emerged Mr Cox's car was insured. Officers had been tailing the motorist as he drove through Bridgwater, Somerset.

    When he stopped at the home of his partner Donna Allen, 47, where he was going to do some gardening, he asked the police what they wanted. He said: 'I asked them to park on the other side of the road because we were working on the front garden. 'The officer didn't say anything, but he got out of the car and pulled out a Taser and pointed it at me.

    'I didn't know this at the time so I just went on with what I was doing and got a bag of stone for the garden out of the boot. Then he shot me.' Mr Cox denied acting aggressively. He said the Taser missed his genitals by three inches. He continued: 'I was really shocked and I didn't know what was going on. I got one in my groin and one in my ankle. 'It really hurt. It just stunned me completely and felt like someone was stabbing me with a fork all over my body.' He added: 'Police should not be armed with Tasers if they cannot use them properly. 'It was incredibly painful. It totally paralysed me.'

    Paramedics treated Mr Cox, who suffers from debilitating Guillain Barre syndrome - an autoimmune disorder which can cause paralysis - on the front lawn of the home. A spokesman for Avon and Somerset police confirmed officers had wanted to speak to Mr Cox as they suspected the BMW 3 Series he was driving was not insured. The force later issued a statement, saying: 'The Taser is a hand-held device which discharges an electrical current to temporarily incapacitate a person.

    'Its effects are short-lived but are designed to give officers control of the offender and the situation.' The statement continued: 'On Tuesday morning officers stopped a man in Bridgwater suspected to be driving a vehicle without insurance. 'The man appeared to become aggressive and the officer removed his Taser in accordance with protocol.

    'On lowering the Taser it was accidentally discharged. Police are now looking into this.' The incident is the latest episode to raise questions over the use of Tasers by police. It has been suggested that Raoul Moat shot himself in the head during negotiations with police because of an involuntary action caused by being shot with the weapon. Since being introduced in April 2004, Tasers have been used in more than 5,400 incidents in England and Wales.

  • SOURCE
  • BUNGLING UK ARMED COPS FIRE GUNS ACCIDENTLY? 110 TIMES IN THREE YEARS
    armed cops Police marksmen have fired their guns more times by mistake than when responding to threats in the last three years, an investigation has found.

    One policeman was accidentally shot dead and two others were left with chest and hand injuries following 110 weapon blunders. Officers have only used their guns 29 times in response to actual incidents - and six members of the public have been killed by armed police in the last three years.

    Armed officers in the Met Police's respected CO19 unit have accidentally blasted their weapons 56 times - more than every other force in the country added together. Control room worker Keith Tilbury who was accidentally shot in the chest during a Thames Valley Police firearms awareness session, was among the victims. Police Constable Ian Terry, a 32-year-old father-of-two, was shot dead by a colleague following a blunder while he played the role of a robber making a getaway during a training session.

    The investigation also revealed:

    * A police officer accidentally shot his own hand while cleaning the weapon at Wiltshire Police HQ in Devizes in July 2008.
    * A diplomatic protection officer shot himself in the leg getting into a car by mistake in September 2007.
    * A Northern Irish police officer accidentally blasted a hole in a hot water tank at a private address in County Down in April 2007.
    * A police constable and an acting sergeant blasted a cow eight times with a rifle and four times with a shotgun during a 'humane destruction' in Stockton-on-Tees in August last year.
    * A Bedfordshire Police officer fired off a Taser 26 times by mistake into a ballistic bag at an armoury in December last year.

    Thirty-one of the 'negligent discharges' happened in Northern Ireland where every police officer carries a weapon, figures released under the Freedom of Information Act revealed.

    Nationally there have been 110 accidental discharges since January 2007. Firearms have also been used 180 times in the destruction of dangerous or dying animals. Non-fatal baton rounds - which only bruise 'victims' - have also been used against offenders 49 times during the same period. The youngest firearms officer in the country is 21 - and the oldest is 61. Both work with the Civil Nuclear Constabulary.

    In the most dramatic blunder, Greater Manchester officer Pc Terry was 'unlawfully killed' during a police training exercise, an inquest ruled. An officer - identified only as Chris - shot Pc Terry from close range with a practice gas round usually used to shoot out tyres. Coroner Nigel Meadows was told that the officer was sat in the front seat of a Suzuki Vitara in a disused factory in north Manchester in June 2008 when he was killed.

    Chris had disobeyed 'golden rules' - and was supposed to keep his gun pointed down at all times and not release the safety catch until the muzzle was placed against the wheel he was shooting out. Six members of the public have also been shot dead - including barrister Mark Saunders. He had been taking pot-shots at police from his £2.2million home when officers killed him in Chelsea, London, in May 2008. David Sycamore was killed by marksmen on the steps of Guildford Cathedral - where horror film The Omen was filmed.

    He sat outside the Cathedral swigging beer holding a phoney firearm waiting for officers to shoot him. Fifty of the 52 police forces in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland provided a response to the FoI request. Some 6,868 officers were authorised to use firearms in England and Wales as of March 2009, official figures revealed.

    In a Police Federation survey of serving officers, 82 per cent said they did not want officers to be routinely armed on duty. A spokesman for ACPO said that armed police had 'top quality' training - despite the blunders. 'Firearms training for UK police officers is among the best in the world and includes common minimum standards for all forces in firearms training,' he said.

    'Whilst any unintentional discharge is a cause for concern, training and debriefing and a review of procedures take place to ensure such unfortunate incidents are kept to an absolute minimum. 'Every incident of accidental discharge is fully investigated by the force concerned and, where appropriate, the IPCC [Independent Police Complaints Commission] is notified in accordance with their set procedures. 'Where appropriate, or where negligence does occur, individuals are dealt with accordingly.' A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police defended the number of blunders.

    'We have nearly 3,000 authorised firearms officers and many deploy every day with firearms. ‘Most will carry two weapons are required to load and unload at the beginning and end of every shift. 'The majority of such discharges are during load and unload drills. They do not involve injury. They are not taken lightly. 'Each case is reviewed. Work is done to remind officers of the risks - to review the operating environments and procedures to make them as safe as possible.

    ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE LEAGUE TABLE:

    Metropolitan Police 56
    Northern Ireland 31
    Bedfordshire 3
    Devon and Cornwall 2
    Lincolnshire Police 2

    Cheshire Police have used their weapons 21 times in 'animal destructions' in three years - more than any other force

  • SOURCE
  • POLICE BRUTALITY IN AMERICA
    u.s. cop brutality Across America, daily incidents occur, one of many the cold-blooded January 1, 2009 murder of Oscar Grant - unarmed, offering no resistance, thrust face-down on the ground, shot in the back, and killed, videotaped on at least four cameras for irrefutable proof. USA Today said five bystanders taped it.

    His killer: Oakland, CA transit officer, Johannes Mehserle, tried for the killing, the jury told to consider four possible verdicts - innocent, second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter, jurors deciding the latter. The Legal Dictionary defines it as "The act of unlawfully killing another human being unintentionally," the absence of intent distinguishing it from voluntary manslaughter. Many states don't define it or do it vaguely. Wallin & Klarich Violent Crime Attorneys say in California it carries a two - four year sentence. However, since a gun was used, Judge Robert Perry can add three to 10 additional years.

    Because minority victims seldom get justice, especially against police, Mehserle may serve minimal time, then be paroled quietly when the current furor subsides. After the verdict, it erupted on Oakland streets, hundreds turning out to protest, Bay Area indymedia.org saying: "The actions of the Police in Oakland tonight (including dozens of arrests) show their disrespect for justice in General. Their heavy handed violence towards protestors just reinforces their total disconnect with the people of Oakland." It's as true everywhere across America, police acting like Gestapo, usually unaccountably. Grant's family will appeal the verdict and is suing the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) for $25 million, his mother Wanda Johnson saying "My son was murdered (and) the law has not held the officer accountable." It rarely does for Black, Latino, or other minorities, no matter the injustice, civil rights lawyer John Burris, representing Grant's family in the civil suit, saying:

    "The system is rarely fair when a police officer shoots an African-American male." Police brutality against them and other minorites is systemic, including beatings, torture, and cold-blooded murder, usually with impunity, justice nearly always denied. While far from certain, the Obama administration may charge Mehserle with civil rights or hate crime violations, DOJ spokesman Alejandro Miyar saying: "The Justice Department has been closely monitoring the state's investigation and prosecution. The Civil Rights Division, the US Attorney's Office, and the FBI have an open investigation into the fatal shooting and, at the conclusion of the state prosecution, will conduct an independent review of the facts and circumstances to determine whether the evidence warrants federal prosecution."

    Systemic Police Brutality

    An earlier Jones Report.com text and video account headlined, "Epidemic of Police Brutality Sweeps America," showing footage of police repeatedly tasering a student with 50,000 volts of electricity for questioning the 2004 election results at a campus meeting.

    Other videotaped incidents showed:

    -- a man victimized by police violence;

    -- a former sheriff's deputy acquitted of voluntary manslaughter for shooting an unarmed man;

    -- police repeatedly beating an old man on the head, "for the crime of intoxication;"

    -- officers violently using assault rifles, tear gas, dogs, and at least one helicopter in an alleged narcotics sweep;

    -- a woman tasered to death by police; and

    -- a man in shock, bleeding and burned over much of his body, ordered to lie on the pavement, then tasered and shot to death while he sat dazed, the Report highlighting systemic police violence "repeated almost every day in (America), the police (getting) away with murder," beatings, and other lawless acts - poor Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims for their faith and ethnicity their usual victims.

    Amnesty International (AI) on American Police Brutality

    On its web site, AI says "Police brutality and use of excessive force has been one of the central themes of (AI's) campaign on human rights violations in the USA," launched in October 1998. In its "United States of America: Rights for All Index," it documented systematic patterns of abuse across America, including "police beatings, unjustified shootings and the use of dangerous restraint techniques to subdue suspects." Yet little is done to monitor or constrain it, evidence showing that "racial and ethnic minorities were disproportionately" harmed by harassment, verbal and physical abuse, false arrests, and in the case of West African immigrant, Amadou Diallo, shot at 41 times by four New York policemen, struck 19 times and killed while he stood in the vestibule of his apartment building, unarmed and nonviolent, victimized by police brutality. Nationwide, driving while black has been criminalized, racial profiling used for traffic stops and searches for suspected drugs or other reasons, the practice especially common in California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Texas.

    AI cited numerous incidents, including beatings and "questionable" shootings, usually found to be unjustified, yet cops most often absolved. Although most US police departments stipulate that officers should only use deadly force when their lives, or others, are endangered, dozens of cases show they do it indiscriminately, at most being "mildly disciplined" even if guilty of serious misconduct. "Police shooting(s) resulting in death or injury are routinely reviewed (internally or) by local prosecutors....to see whether criminal laws (were) violated. However, few officers are criminally charged and little public information is given out if a case does not go to trial." As a result, systemic abuse stays hidden, police brutality allowed to persist with impunity. Despite Congress passing the 1994 Police Accountability Act, incorporated into the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act to require the Attorney General to compile national data on excessive police force, Congress has consistently failed to fund it. Further, the legislation doesn't require local police agencies to keep records or submit data to the Justice Department. Nor does it criminalize police violence and excessive force as human rights violations.

    ACLU Report on Racial and Ethnic Profiling

    In August 2009, the report titled, "The Persistence of Racial Profiling in the United States" quoted Rep. John Conyers (D. MI) saying "Since (9/11), our nation has engaged in a policy of institutionalized racial and ethnic profiling," although, as an African-American, he knows the problem goes back generations, most recently in the "war on terrorism" against Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims for their faith, ethnicity, activism, prominence, and at times charity, a topic this writer addresses often - arrests, some violently, bogus charges, prosecutions, and imprisonments often compounding the injustice. Post-9/11 under Bush and Obama, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies have engaged in virulent racial/ethnic profiling, what the ACLU calls "a widespread and pervasive problem throughout the United States, impacting the lives of millions of people in African American, Asian, Latino, South Asian, and Arab communities." Evidence shows that racial minorities are systematically victimized, without cause, in public, when driving, at work, at home, in places of worship, and traveling, often violently.

    A "major impediment to (prohibiting it) remains the continued unwillingness or inability of the US government to pass federal legislation (banning the practice) with binding effect on federal, state or local law enforcement." Nor do authorities comply with the provisions of the 1994 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) that obligates all levels of government. In addition, the Justice Department's 2003 Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies designed to ban federal officers from engaging in racial profiling is, in fact, flawed and does little to end it, because it doesn't cover "profiling based on religion, religious appearance, or national origin."

    Nor does it apply to state and local law enforcement where police brutality is systemic. In addition, it specifies no enforcement mechanisms or punishments for violators, and contains a "blanket exception for national security and border integrity cases," besides being advisory and not legally binding. As a result, it actually promotes profiling and abuse, including false arrests, beatings and killings. It's not surprising how minorities have been systematically mistreated by federal, state and local authorities, or that congressional legislation introduced to stop it never passed. On December 13, 2007, the House and Senate introduced their versions of the End Racial Profiling Act (HR 4611 and S. 2481). Both bills were referred to committee and never enacted - making it extremely hard to nearly impossible for victims to successfully challenge abuses against them. As a candidate, Obama promised a "Blueprint for Change" to ban racial profiling and related mistreatment, criminalizing them, but so far, no measures have been introduced or passed, showing another promise made, another broken, a systematic pattern under his leadership, across the board against the constituencies that elected him. Hopefully they'll remember next election and choose another way, a third way, both parties equally corrupted in deference to big money and systemic police brutality that serves it.

    National Police Misconduct Statistics

    The Injustice Everywhere.com (IE) web site compiles them, publishing them in regular reports, some for individual cities, including daily accounts. One on July 10 covers King County, WA deputy Paul Schene, captured on videotape assaulting a 15-year old girl in jail. He was tried twice, hung juries resulting each time. On July 9, the County Prosecutor's Office dropped the charges, and won't pursue a third trial. As a result, the sheriff's department may rehire Schene, though he still faces possible disciplinary action. It's currently in arbitration, IE saying decisions nearly always favor officers, in which case he'll likely be reinstated to abuse other detainees, off camera to avoid being charged. In early 2010, IE published an April - mid-December 2009 (8.5 months) Police Misconduct Report, from figures compiled in its National Police Misconduct Statistics Reporting Project (NPMSRP), begun earlier in March 2009, analyzing data:

    "by utilizing news media reports of police misconduct to generate statistical information (to) approximate how prevalent (it) may be in the United States." Police departments don't usually provide them, nor do courts, except for successful prosecutions, omitting confidential settlements and cases resulting in disciplinary action only, not trials. Media reports, though imperfect, are more complete because laws limit or filter information released. As a result, IE's data "should be considered as a low-end estimate of the current rate of police misconduct," as well as in individual cities covered. Statistics compiled follow the same DOJ/FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) methodology, recording only the most serious allegation (not conviction) when multiple ones are associated with a particular incident. The findings were as follows:

    -- 3,445 police misconduct reports;

    -- 4,012 officers charged;

    -- 261 law enforcement officials (police chiefs or sheriffs) cited;

    -- 4,778 alleged victims;

    -- 258 fatalities reported;

    -- an average of 15.05 daily incidents or one every 96 minutes;

    -- nearly $200 million in related civil litigation expense, excluding legal fees and court costs;

    -- 980.64 per 100,000 officers charged;

    -- one of every 266 officers accused of a violent crime;

    -- one of every 1,875 charged with homocide;

    -- one of every 947 accused of sexual assault;

    -- 33% of police officers charged were convicted, not necessarily justly for the offense committed;

    -- 64% of officers convicted were imprisoned, not necessarily as long as justified;

    -- those sentenced served an average 14 months, far less than citizens for the same crime;

    -- misconduct by category included 18.1% for non-firearm related excessive force; 11.9% for sexual misconduct; and 8.9% for fraud or theft;

    -- analyzing reports by last reported status showed 45.9% affected officers adversely, including 14% internally disciplined and 31.9% criminally charged; of the latter, 32.5% were convicted "for a 10.4% total criminal conviction rate for alleged misconduct incidents; and

    -- 27% resulted in civil lawsuits, 34.3% favoring victims.

    In addition, data were compiled for states, cities and counties, excluding unavailable federal statistics as well as local omissions, especially in some states. Various offenses included:

    -- accountability: evidence of coverups, lax discipline, and other failures to adhere to official policies or processes;

    -- animal cruelty, harming them by unnecessary shooting, inappropriate KP unit training, or other mistreatment;

    -- assault: "unwarranted violence" off-duty, excluding murder;

    -- auto incidents involving recklessness, negligence, and other violations of official policies;

    -- brutality, involving excessive physical force on-duty, excluding firearms or tasers;

    -- civil rights, including unconstitutional civil liberties violations such as lawless peaceful protest disruptions;

    -- sexual misconduct, including rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, wrongfully eliciting sex, harassment, coercion, prostitution, sex on duty, incest, and molestation;

    -- theft or fraud, including robbery, shoplifting, extortion or bribery;

    -- shooting: gun-related incidents both on and off-duty, including self-harm;

    -- taser: excessive force, including usage not according to guidelines, resulting in excessive injury or death; also, improper taser use may be recorded as "brutality;"

    -- color of law, including incidents involving misuse of authority such as bribery, soliciting favors, extortion by threat of arrest, or using badges to avoid arrest;

    -- perjury, including false testimony, dishonesty during investigations, and falsifying charging papers or warrants; and

    -- raids, including misconduct during warranted or warrantless operations or searches, wrong address raids, mistaken ones, use of no-knock ones when warrants require notification, or mistreatment during executions.

    Misconduct status stages go from allegations to investigations, lawsuits, charges, trials, judgments, disciplinary measures, terminations, convictions, and sentences.

    IE compiles data regularly, prepares daily and quarterly reports, and henceforth an annual one each January the following year. It explains that its statistics: "should only be used (as) a very basic and general view of the extent of police misconduct. It is by no means an accurate gauge that truly represents the exact extent (of its extensiveness) since it relies on the information voluntarily gathered and/or released to the media, not (first-hand) by independent monitors who investigate complaints.....because no such agency exists for any law enforcement agency...." Detailed quarterly and annual reports are produced, not monthly ones considered a less accurate "depiction of the overall extent of police misconduct...." Daily reports cover a sampling of individual incidents. Overall, IE provides a valuable reading of systemic police misconduct, though capturing only a snapshot of the full problem - widespread, abusive, violent, often with impunity, and when officers are held accountable, imposed discipline is usually mild, prison sentences rare and short-term, victims cheated by a criminally unjust system, favoring power over people, no matter the offense.

    Final Comments

    In December 2007, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination published a report titled, "In the Shadows of the War on Terror: Persistent Police Brutality and Abuse of People of Color in the United States," saying: "Since this Committee's 2001 review of the US, during which it expressed concern regarding incidents of police brutality and deaths in custody at the hands of US law enforcement officers, there have been dramatic increases in law enforcement powers in the name of waging the "war on terror (resulting in) the use of excessive force against people of color....(It's not only continued post-9/11), but has worsened in both practice and severity" - a NAACP representative saying it's "the worst I've seen in 50 years." On April 4, 2007, Ryan Gallagher, writing for Medill Reports, produced by Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, headlined, "Study: Police abuse goes unpunished," saying:

    From 2002 - 2004, over "10,000 complaints of police abuse were filed with Chicago police....but only 19 resulted in meaningful disciplinary action, a new study asserts." According to Gerald Frazier, president of Citizens Alert, it reflects "not only the appearance of influence and cover-up," but clear evidence that city residents are being abused, not protected, despite the department's official motto being "We Serve and Protect." Most disturbing is that the Chicago pattern reflects what's happening across America, people of color like Oscar Grant systematically abused, in his case murdered in cold blood, what no criminal or civil actions can undo.

  • SOURCE
  • FACEBOOK REFUSES TO TAKE DOWN RAOUL MOAT'S TRIBUTE PAGE VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • New Facebook tribute to gun killer Raoul Moat attracts 12,000
  • POWERFUL TASERS USED BY COPS TO SHOOT RAOUL MOAT WERE STILL BEING TESTED
    taser xrep CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE TASER XREP

    Police officers who shot at Raoul Moat used high-powered Tasers that were still being tested and had not been approved by the Home Office.

    The marksmen fired at the fugitive gunman to try to incapacitate him at about the same time he shot himself, an inquest heard today. Newcastle coroner's court heard the officers, from West Yorkshire police, discharged their Tasers at Moat, but that an investigation would have to determine whether the shots landed before the bouncer shot himself with a sawn-off shotgun. Independent Police Complaints Authority senior investigator Steve Reynolds said: "Mr Moat's shotgun discharged, resulting in him receiving fatal injuries. "At some point around the time of the fatal shot two West Yorkshire firearms officers armed with Tasers discharged their weapons at Mr Moat. This was understood to have been in an effort to prevent Mr Moat taking his own life. "At this stage the precise sequence of events regarding the discharge of Taser has not been established and is under investigation."

    During the stand-off police were armed with the Taser XREP, which is still being tested. It is up to four times as powerful as a normal Taser. The Home Office confirmed today it was not approved for use by forces in England and Wales. A spokesman said: "It is currently subject to testing by the Home Office Scientific Development Branch. "However, legally, police forces have discretion to use any equipment they see fit as long as the use of force is lawful, reasonable and proportionate.

    "The process for approval of less lethal weapons is set out in a Home Office code of practice document on police use of firearms which Chief Constables must 'have regard to'." Moat shot and killed Chris Brown and wounded his former girlfriend Samantha Stobbart before shooting Pc David Rathband and going on the run. Newcastle coroner David Mitford said the cause of his death was a gunshot wound to the head. A further three men were today arrested for allegedly helping Moat to evade capture. They were held during raids in Newcastle and Gateshead.

    A Northumbria Police spokesman said: "At this stage the investigation is still ongoing and further arrests can't be ruled out." The latest arrests bring the total number in connection with the inquiry to 10. Four men and a woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender have been bailed. Two other men have been charged with conspiracy to commit murder and possessing a firearm with intent. Karl Ness, 26, from Dudley in North Tyneside, and Qhuram Awan, 23, from Blyth, Northumberland, appeared before Newcastle magistrates on July 8, and were remanded in custody until July 22. Today, Northumbria police said searches of the storm drain under Rothbury had not shown that Moat had hidden there. "The drain was searched and an examination showed no evidence or signs of disturbance that would indicate anybody had been in the drain," a force spokesman said.

  • SOURCE
  • Cop chief condemns 'extraordinary' public outpouring of sympathy for Raoul Moat
  • New Shotgun Tasers are being tested by UK Police VIDEO
  • IAN TOMLINSON PATHOLOGIST ACCUSED OF INCOMPETENCE OVER AUTOPSIES
    IAN TOMLINSON MURDERED BY G20 THUG COPS

    Freddy Patel to appear before disciplinary panel of GMC, which has power to strike him off register

    The pathologist whose initial examination suggested that Ian Tomlinson died of a heart attack during the G20 protests in London is facing accusations that he conducted four other autopsies incompetently. Dr Mohmed Saeed Sulema Patel ,known as Freddy Patel, will appear this week before a disciplinary panel of the General Medical Council, which has the power to strike him off the professional register. The identities of the deceased in the postmortem examinations have not been disclosed in advance of the hearing, but they do not include Tomlinson because his case is under active consideration by the Crown Prosecution Service. It is possible that the four autopsies relate to fewer than four deaths, because more than one examination is sometimes performed on a body.

    Patel has performed autopsies in contentious cases in London for two decades, some involving deaths in police custody. Tomlinson, 47, a newspaper seller, was allegedly assaulted by police during the G20 protests in the City of London in April 2009. He had been walking home from work when he was confronted by officers. The incident was captured on video and broadcast on the Guardian's website. No officer has been charged in relation to Tomlinson's death. The CPS has been considering a file sent to it by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) since last August.

    Patel concluded Tomlinson had had a heart attack, implying his death was unrelated to any injuries sustained when he fell on to the pavement. A second autopsy, commissioned by the IPCC, found the cause of death was more likely to be abdominal bleeding – an injury consistent with a fall or assault. Tomlinson's death triggered complaints about excessive police force and highlighted concern over the independence of coroners' investigations. Patel's professional record and findings were the subject of severe criticism at the time. Another of the high-profile deaths for which Patel carried out an autopsy was that of Sally White, 38, whose body was discovered locked in a bedroom in the Camden flat of Anthony Hardy, a 52-year-old alcoholic with psychiatric problems. The case was treated as suspicious until Patel detailed the cause of death as a heart attack. Hardy went on to kill Elizabeth Valad, 29, and Brigette MacClennan, 34.

    Patel's medical work is already restricted. He has been suspended from the Home Office register of accredited forensic pathologists and barred from carrying out postmortem examinations in "suspicious death" cases. Patel, who qualified as a doctor initially at the University of Zambia in 1974, was registered to practise in Britain in 1988. In 1999 he was disciplined by the GMC after discussing, outside an inquest hearing, the medical history of Roger Sylvester, who died in police custody. He told reporters: "I am aware from the medical records held at Whittington hospital that Mr Sylvester was a user of crack cocaine."

    Sylvester's family were devastated by the claim and denied that he been a user. The advance GMC notice of this hearing says that its fitness to practise panel will "inquire into allegations that, whilst working as a consultant forensic pathologist, Dr Mohmed Patel's conduct in carrying our four postmortems was irresponsible …" It adds that itwas "not of the standard expected of a competent Home Office registered forensic pathologist and that in one case his conduct was liable to bring the profession into disrepute". Deborah Coles, of the charity Inquest, said: "This [GMC] case raises two important questions: how robust is the decision-making process adopted by coroners when instructing pathologists, and what checks and balances exist to deal with concerns about an individual pathologist's conduct in contentious cases." Patel has previously defended his work. "As far as I know, my findings [in the White case] stand as they were, and I wasn't criticised," he said last year. He declined to comment about the hearing. "I can't say anything," he said.

  • SOURCE
  • NONE TO COSY A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MURDOCH'S RAGS AND BRITISH COPS
    raoul moat For anyone who hasn't yet noticed all the latest video's and images taken by the cops of Raoul Moat's final minutes have been given exclusively to the News of the World. Murdoch is as right wing as it gets, a Zionist mobster, who uses his thug journalists to smear anyone considered an enemy of the state and why the cops want to ensure anything they are involved in paints them in a good light. They can be assured, the warmongering police protectors the News of the World, will guarantee the necessary spin and propaganda that will be good PR for the masonic cops now running the British police state.

    Raoul Moat was clearly disturbed and mentally ill and for whatever reason, we have yet to be informed, took a gun and shot a number of people before finally ending his own life. Only a disturbed individual could do so but the cops and their press allies paint a very different picture which has become a regular feature of how a complicit media closely allies with Britain's ruthless cops to ensure men are tarred and feathered immediately they turn on the state that by the day is destroying men's lives on a grand scale.

    Moat may have taken extreme measures to counter the threat the British state imposes on men's lives and freedoms but there are men facing the same extreme prejudices and injustices everyday thanks to judgements by judicial thugs cutting men off from their children, homes and assets that psychologically damage them. We only hear of the extreme's like Moat when deaths occur but men across the UK are being psychologically tortured by state sanctioned thugs working together via family courts to create the same scenario's over and over again that unless stopped will unleash many more like Moat who's life was extinguished while clearly disturbed. We only know what was going on, on the surface but the media will ensure we will never fully understand what went on in the weeks and months before the tragic incidents that occurred over the last week.

    Here are just two of the News of the World articles that clearly make the point.

  • NOTW: Sensational police account and video of crazed killer's last moments
  • NOTW: Battle to keep beast breathing
  • DAILY STAR'S VERSION: QUESTIONS OVER RAOUL MOAT'S DEATH
  • Gascoigne reckons cop snipers tipped gunman Raoul Moat over the edge
  • Fugitive gunman's death 'like a public execution', says brother
  • MOAT COPS TOP THE TASER USING LIST
    cop weird Northumbria Police, which is facing questions about its use of Taser stun guns during a stand-off with gunman Raoul Moat, topped a recent league for the number of incidents in which a Taser was aimed or used.

    The force reported even more incidents involving stun guns than the Metropolitan Police which covers a population more than five times larger. Figures released last summer showed Northumbria Constabulary, which covers a population of around 1.4 million people, had recorded 704 incidents in which a Taser was used in some way, even if it was only aimed, between April 2004 and August 2009 when the statistics were released. The Metropolitan Police, which covers a population of more than 7.4 million, recorded 700 Taser incidents.

    The use of Tasers has always been controversial in Britain and human rights group Amnesty International has repeatedly said they should only be used where lives are at risk. The stun guns fire two electric barbs up to 35 feet and deliver a disabling 50,000-volt shock, which can penetrate clothing up to two inches thick. It leaves targets incapacitated and easier to arrest. Moat was said by witnesses to be holding a gun to his head during the stand-off but Northumbria Police has refused to answer questions about when exactly the stun guns were used or to explain the reason for their use at that exact moment. Arizona-based Taser International, which manufactures the weapons, says they are designed to temporarily stun a suspect, forcing him or her to collapse into a foetal ball, so the person can be arrested.

    It insists the device causes no long-term injuries and only short-term skin irritation but accepts there is a danger of eye injury if it is fired at someone's face. Human rights groups claim Tasers can be lethal and in 2008 Amnesty International said 334 people had died in the US since 2001 after being shot by the weapons. The weapon was first used on a human by British police on August 3, 2003, when officers in London encountered a man armed with two handguns. It had been deployed once previously, by North Wales Police in June 2003, against a dangerous dog which was running amok in Wrexham.

    The incidents came during a 12-month trial by the Northamptonshire, Metropolitan, North Wales, Thames Valley and Lincolnshire forces. During the trial Tasers were deployed in 60 incidents and aimed 40 times but actually fired only 13 times. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) said the weapon had been shown to have a significant deterrent effect.

    Firearms officers became authorised to carry Taser guns in 2004, the same year that a survey of 1,164 people found 90% thought firearms officers and specially-trained officers should be allowed to use them. The Home Office authorised officers to use Tasers in a wider range of circumstances from July 2007. Officers had been able to use the high-voltage weapons only in circumstances when they could have used a conventional firearm but the new rules allowed Tasers to be used in less serious incidents but when they still faced violence or threats of violence. Non-firearms officers were authorised to use the weapons - provided they were given additional training - in September 2007 under a pilot scheme involving 10 forces. The following year the Home Office expanded the scheme to all 43 forces in England and Wales and use of the stun guns increased by nearly a third.

    In November 2008 Home Secretary Jacqui Smith announced 10,000 Tasers would be issued to specially trained officers. Ms Smith said she was proud Britain had one of the few police services around the world that did not regularly carry firearms but added: "I want to give the police the tools they tell me they need to confront dangerous people." Extra funding for a further 6,000 new Tasers was announced in March last year.

    In June last year the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) brought in new rules which meant police forces had to pass all complaints about Taser guns to the police watchdog. British Transport Police officers armed with electric stun guns were deployed on the rail network for the first time in December last year in pilot schemes in London, Cardiff and Manchester. Police officers, including the late Manchester chief constable Michael Todd, have volunteered to be stunned by a Taser to show its effects.

    Detective Constable Joe Holness, from Kent Police, volunteered at the Police Federation's 2005 conference, and 95% of delegates later voted in favour of all operational police officers being issued with Tasers. In 2007 North Wales chief constable Richard Brunstrom was seen screaming "bloody hell" in a video as he was stung by a Taser. Mr Brunstrom was hit with the Taser gun for 1.5 seconds before telling his officers: "That was long enough, thanks."

  • SOURCE
  • BRITISH COPS HARASSED AND PERSECUTED GUNMAN FOR YEARS
    raoul moat WE HAVE TONS OF EVIDENCE, INCLUDING OUR OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCES TO SHOW THAT MASONIC COPS PERSECUTE SEPARATED FATHERS AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY TORTURE THEM TO ULTIMATELY STEAL A MAN'S ASSETS , HOME , BUSINESS BUT ESPECIALLY CHILDREN.

    The best pal of Raoul Moat who tried to end the six-hour armed stand-off spoke yesterday of the gunmans last tearful minutes before he shot himself dead.

    Bodybuilder Tony Laidler was led through the police cordon in the early hours yesterday in the hope his presence would persuade former bouncer Moat, 37, to give himself up. But Tony, 35, says cops refused to let him speak to his desperate friend. They suddenly switched off arc lights surrounding Moat and are said to have jumped on him as they fired a Taser stun gun but he blasted himself in the head with his sawn-off shotgun. Tony said: I wont experience another night like this in my life. Raoul knew I was there and called out my name. He was in tears as he spoke to the police. I thought I could help save his life. I was there when the shot went off. That was it bang. I cannot tell you what it felt like. Of course I feel sorry for other people hurt and killed by all of this but Ive lost a friend for life. Now all I want to do is sleep so I can forget everything that has happened.

    Tony was allowed through the cordon in a bid to resolve the siege on a riverbank in Rothbury, Northumberland. But he said: The police didnt let me speak to him. I felt I could have helped Raoul. When I went through the cordon I asked to speak to him. I was there for a few hours. Raoul knew I was there.

    I really dont know why they wouldnt let me speak to my mate. They wouldnt give me a reason. I know he saw me even though it was getting dark. I blame the police for not letting me speak to him. They have been a pain from the day this all started. They didnt know what they were doing from the start everyone knows that. I want to sort out something for his kids they are blameless in all this. Earlier Tony said Moat blamed his ex- girlfriends sex taunts for tipping him over the edge and turning him into a killer.

    The gunman said Samantha Stobbart had taunted him about her new man and bragged that he was a younger, hotter lover. In a bitter rant to Tony before he was finally cornered, Moat claimed that Sam, 22, talked in graphic detail about the sex life she enjoyed with karate expert Chris Brown, 29. But Tony admits Moat who murdered Chris and badly wounded Sam and traffic cop David Rathband, 42 was so deranged by jealousy and paranoia his claims may have lies. But he claims the ex-con kept replaying his final phone conversation with Sam, the mother of his one-year-old daughter Chanel, saying she goaded him.

    Tony who was talking when news broke that Moat had been cornered says his old schoolfriend poured out his grievances after his release from Durham jail 10 days ago. He said: When Sam claimed her new boyfriend was a copper that was bad enough but she went on about him until Raoul hung up the phone at that point. He told me she taunted him, describing what she got up to with her new boyfriend.

    That was it. He'd had trouble with the police, and then when he heard that from Sam it tipped him over the edge. He came out of prison with nothing. No kids, no job or house and then finally the love of his life left him for another man. He couldnt take it any more. I knew it might end this way. He wasn't going to go quietly, but I thought he had no ammunition left in his gun. He must have got more. Tony told how Moat fell for Sam from the moment they met in a Newcastle bar. He said: They clicked instantly. He became besotted by her and gradually I would see him less and less.

    He would never look at another woman while he was with her. He never touched one single lass. He used to joke and call me Mr Hands on a night out because I would be with other women. He used to be the same but when he got with Sam that all stopped straight away. It was love at first sight for him. Tony told how another big blow was when his three children were taken away by social services when he went into prison for a short sentence for assault. Tony visited him just days before he was due to be locked up.

    He said: He was really nervous about going inside, but worst of all he was losing his children. It was terrible for him. I was even trying to get two of his kids myself so I could look after them for him. But that never happened.

    Hassle

    He was really depressed when he went inside. His business was failing because the police kept taking vans off him. They would hassle him by checking the tyres, and if he had some scrap in the boot they would examine it and ask why it was there. He's a big guy. Six foot three and nineteen stone makes you a target in jail, and he got into a few fights. When he came out of jail he had nothing.

    No kids, no house, no job. And then he found out she dumped him for another man. It was too much for him to take. Losing Sam was the final straw. Fellow bouncer Tony, who has worked on the doors of pubs and clubs in Newcastle alongside Moat, grew up with the killer after they met when they were toddlers. And Tony said they always vowed to do anything for one another through their schooldays. Tony, who bears a striking resemblance to Moat, said: We'd always stand by each other, even when we were kids. I would never have given him up to the police. I wanted him to keep hiding and somehow get away. If he turned up at my house asking for my passport I would probably have given him it.

    Tony also said that for years he watched Moat as he had run-in after run-in with the police. Tony said: He wasn't a bad lad. He set up a business as a tree surgeon but he couldn't get it going properly because the police confiscated his vans for stupid things like having illegal scrap metal in his boot when it was just a bit of harmless rubbish. They would pull him up on really minor things. He even installed a camera on his house so he could film them watching him. He was paranoid they had him under surveillance all the time.

    Last week police went to Tony's house to seize his mobile phone. He said: The officer said to me, You've got Raoul's number on your mobile. And I said back to him, Of course I have, hes my best mate. And Tony claimed Moats mind had NOT been scrambled by taking bodybuilding steroids. He said Moat stopped taking the drugs around six years ago the same time he first met Samantha and his weight plummeted from 19 stone to 16 stone.

  • SOURCE
  • ON THE RUN GUNMAN RAOUL MOAT SHOOTS HIMSELF DEAD(OR SO SAY COPS) VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • LATEST IMAGES OF COPS TRYING TO CATCH 'ON THE RUN' GUNMAN
    cop weird We can all sleep at night knowing the British cops like the one pictured will be taking care of our safety and security. If there is ONE image that sums up why Britain is in the state it is in , rife with corruption and white collar establishment crimes it is this one.

    We have known for a very long time the British cops are a bunch of masonic morons and this picture captures them at their very best. A solitary gunman has shown how dire they are when it has taken almost half the countries police forces over the last week on MOUNTAINS of overtime to pin down a single gunman.

  • Raoul Moat: Police negotiate with man resembling gunman
  • LATEST: Moat kills himself in stand-off
  • ACPO AND THEIR MASONIC PERKS
    Walk half a mile? But we're in ACPO: Britain's senior police chiefs get executive coach for half-mile trip

    After years pounding the beat when they first started out in the force, ­Britain’s most senior police chiefs might have been expected to manage a walk from one reception to another of just over half a mile. Instead, they were ushered on to an executive coach and escorted by two ­officers on horseback and others – in a marked patrol car – carrying guns. Once they reached their destination, the chief constables and their spouses enjoyed champagne and a feast of chocolate-dipped strawberries, Aberdeen steak and salt marsh lamb.

    The bizarre journey took place in Manchester last week at the annual conference of the Association of Chief Police Officers. The country’s most powerful policing organisation, which trades as the private company ACPO Limited, is funded with £10 million from the taxpayer. The Mail on Sunday revealed last week that £500,000 of public money was being spent on the three-day junket. ACPO went ahead with the lavish event despite predictions in an internal document that 28,000 frontline police officers could be replaced by cheaper civilian staff as part of a savage cost-cutting ­programme. In his speech to delegates, president Sir Hugh Orde referred to our report last week. He said: ‘It is important that the private sector and the public sector work seamlessly to deliver the best service we can to the public. I’m also delighted that the quality of champagne is absolutely up to The Mail on Sunday standard.’ At another event later in the week, delegates were protected by a private security company.

    Controlled Event Solutions were hired by the Lowry Hotel for the officers’ £98-a-head black-tie dinner. ACPO has been under fire since The Mail on Sunday revealed that it sells information from the Police National Computer for up to £70 a time – even though it pays just 60p to access details. It also markets ‘police approval’ logos to firms selling anti-theft devices and operates a separate firm offering training to speed-camera operators.

    The conference was funded from ACPO’s ­coffers and by the 44 police forces which sent ­representatives. It cost £771 per person – a bill of more than £269,000 to the taxpayer. The association booked hundreds of hotel rooms at £150 a night, adding an estimated £157,000. ACPO said no special security arrangements had been laid on for the coach trip. A spokesman said: ‘These officers were already in the area, were not part of any extra security and did not cost any money. The conference provides a vital and rare opportunity for chief officers, Government and police authority members to debate how best to keep people safe.’

  • SOURCE
  • AS 28,000 COPS FACE AXE , CHIEFS BLOW £500K ON CHAMPAGNE GALA
    acpo gala

    BRITAIN IS RIFE WITH WHITE COLLAR FRAUD AND CORRUPTION THANKS TO MASONIC CHIEF CONSTABLES TURNING A BLIND EYE TO THE TYRANNY OF CROOKED JUDGES, LAWYERS , COUNCIL CHIEFS AND A MYRIAD OF STATE FUNDED THUGS WHO UTTERLY ABUSE THEIR POWERS BY BULLYING THE LONG SUFFERING PUBLIC OF THE UK.

    Britain’s top police officers will spend half-a-million pounds of taxpayers’ cash on luxury hotels and a champagne gala this week just days after the Government ordered savage police budget cuts.

    The huge outlay is for the annual conference of the UK’s most powerful policing body, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Chief Constables and senior officers will be treated to champagne and strawberries dipped in chocolate at the three-day affair. The policing organisation, which trades as the private company ACPO Limited, is funded with £10million from the taxpayer.

    The conference comes as The Mail on Sunday has obtained a confidential ACPO document suggesting 28,000 frontline police officers could be axed and replaced by cheaper civilian staff. As police forces across the country face the threat of budget cuts and job losses, ‘not-for-profit’ ACPO stands to make about £200,000 from the event at Manchester Central Hall – adding to the £395,000 ‘surplus’ it made from similar events in 2008 and 2009. The revelation will increase pressure on the organisation which is in charge of everything from anti-terrorism policy to speed cameras, and is already facing major questions over how it is run.

    ACPO is under fire after The Mail on Sunday revealed it is:

    * Selling information from the Police National Computer for up to £70 a time – even though it pays just 60p to access details.

    * Marketing ‘police approval’ logos to firms selling anti-theft devices.

    * Operating a separate private firm offering training to speed-camera operators.

    It has also spent millions of pounds meant for counter-terrorism work on luxury London flats for senior officers. Its new boss, Sir Hugh Orde, the former Northern Ireland Chief Constable who became ACPO President last year, is also facing questions over his future after he threatened to quit if the Tories came to power. He is paid £183,000-a-year on top of a police and civil service pension to run the self-styled ‘global brand name’.

    But despite Sir Hugh’s pledge to reform the organisation, last year it had an income of more than £10 million – almost all of it from the taxpayer – and an incredible £15 million cash ‘at hand’ in its bank account. Sir Hugh put himself on a collision course with the Tories last year when he attacked their proposal to introduce directly elected police commissioners. Now he must address his police colleagues on the subject, before introducing the new Home Secretary Theresa May, who is determined to push the policy through. One senior officer who is due to attend the conference said: ‘Sir Hugh has lost face over this and has quietly signalled a U-turn. 'Powerful people are referring to him as a lame duck.’

    Mrs May is also determined to apply the 25 per cent cuts outlined in last week’s Budget. It is already feared large numbers of officers will be axed and police stations shut to make the savings. An internal ACPO ‘Insight’ report suggests ‘modernisation’ could replace 28,000 beat officers with civilians.

    The Manchester event will be funded from ACPO’s coffers and by the 44 police forces sending representatives. The individual cost of attending the conference is £771 including VAT – a total cost of more than £269,000 to the taxpayer. In addition, ACPO has booked hundreds of premier city centre hotel rooms at £150 a night, adding an estimated £157,000 to the bill.

    Officers can also attend a champagne reception and black-tie gala dinner at the city’s luxury five-star Lowry Hotel costing £98 a head. Individual police forces will cover hundreds of pounds in expenses for their officers’ travel and other costs. Last year, the Metropolitan Police’s Assistant Commissioner John Yates, who is also head of ACPO’s national counter terrorism command structure, claimed £551 for his travel and hotel room at the conference.

    Cambridgeshire’s Chief Constable Julie Spence has claimed almost £1,000 to attend ACPO conferences and the force’s Assistant Chief Constable Mark Hopkins another £553. Delegates will arrive on Tuesday night for a drinks reception. Two more parties follow. The highlight is the Gala Dinner at the Lowry where delegates have been invited to the magnificent River bar for a reception with Perrier-Jouet champagne and strawberries dipped in chocolate.

    This will be followed by an extensive menu including Cornish lobster, Aberdeen fillet steak and pan-fried wild sea bass with asparagus. An ACPO spokeswoman refused to discuss the profit the organisation stands to make from the event, or suggestions that officers’ partners are invited to some of the social events. She said: ‘The conference, held in association with the Home Office, is funded through sponsorship, delegate fees and the international policing exhibition which runs alongside the event. 'Sir Hugh Orde has made clear his wish to reform the Association’s status. We are talking to the Government and we hope they will address the issue.’

  • SOURCE
  • MORE ON MASONIC COPS HERE
  • COPS TASER 86 YR OLD DISABLED WOMAN IN BED
    taser Officer 's rationale: Bed-ridden grandmother 'took more aggressive stance' in her bed

    When Lonnie Tinsley of El Reno, Oklahoma, called 911 to ask for medical assistance for his disabled, bed-ridden grandmother, he couldn't have dreamed it would end with police tasering the 86-year-old woman twice, stepping on her oxygen hose until she couldn't breathe, and sending her to a psychiatric hospital for six days. Yet that's what a lawsuit (PDF) filed in a federal court in Oklahoma this week alleges.

    According to the lawsuit, in December, 2009, Tinsley came by his grandmother's apartment to see if she was doing alright in the midst of a winter storm. When she wasn't able to tell him if she had taken her medication, Tinsley called 911 and asked responders to send medical technicians over to evaluate her. But instead of an ambulance, the lawsuit alleges, "as many as 10 El Reno police" arrived and "pushed their way through the door." At that point, 86-year-old Lona Varner told police to "get out of her apartment." That's when officer Thomas Duran, described in the lawsuit as the "leader" of the police unit, allegedly told another officer to "taser her." When Tinsley responded "Don't tase my granny!" the officers threatened to taser him instead, the lawsuit states. In his police report, officer Durgan asserted that Varner "took a more aggressive posture in her bed," evidently causing him to fear for his and his officers' lives.

    Police then handcuffed Tinsley and took him to a waiting squad car. They released him without charge some time later. Meanwhile, the lawsuit alleges, officers "stepped on [Varner's] oxygen hose until she began to suffer oxygen deprivation." Officers then fired a taser at her, hitting her twice, causing her to pass out, the lawsuit states.

    At the direction of El Reno police, Varner was sent to the psychiatric ward of St. Anthony's Hospital in Oklahoma City, where she was held for six days. The lawsuit, which names the city of El Reno and 13 police officers as defendants, alleges that Varner's rights were violated under the Fourth and 14th Amendments to the US Constitution, and that "the defendants caused the plaintiffs to be wrongfully seized, assaulted, battered, physically harmed, humiliated [and] emotionally harmed."

  • SOURCE
  • CAUGHT ON TAPE: NYC COP BEATS IRAQI WAR VET SENSELESS VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • CORRUPT WOMAN COP WHO HELPED GANGSTERS STEAL CARS GETS JAILED FOR TWO YEARS
    hayley cloud A policewoman who helped a group of criminals steal expensive cars has been jailed for two years.

    Pc Hayley Cloud, 27, used her access to confidential police databases to alter the entries for stolen sports cars so that they could not be traced. On one occasion she sent a fax to a police vehicle pound authorising a criminal associate to drive off with a £60,000 Lamborghini Gallardo. The mother of one also passed stolen police radios to the gangsters so that they could listen to conversations between officers and avoid capture.

    Cloud was paid thousands of pounds to check police databases on the direct instructions of a major criminal who was serving time in jail for serious criminal offences. She had first made contact with the underworld boss — who cannot be named for legal reasons — through her boyfriend Ian Cooper, 33, a guard at Wandsworth Prison. The court heard there were more that 80 phone calls and hundreds of text messages between Cloud and the jailed gangster. She also kept in touch with him through Cooper, and “corrupted” a civilian police worker into carrying out further checks on the system. Cloud also carried out checks on criminal associates of the gang boss. A printout of one of the checks was recovered when police raided a house connected to the gang. The court heard police became suspicious of Cloud and Cooper and planted a listening device in their house. The couple were heard discussing the conspiracy, and what they would tell police if they were caught.

    Cloud was jailed yesterday for two years at Southwark crown court. Judge Geoffrey Rivlin, QC, said her sentence would have been twice as long were it not for her young son, and the fact that she pleaded guilty at the first opportunity. Cloud, from Orpington, admitted conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office, theft and handling stolen goods. Cooper will be sentenced at a later date. He has admitted conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office and handling stolen goods.

  • SOURCE
  • COP AND FORMER MR. GAY UK WINNER FACES SEX CHARGES
    mark carter cop and mr. gay UK THE RISE OF HOMOSEXUAL COPS AND THEIR AGENDA'S BEING IMPOSED ON HETEROSEXUAL COMMUNITIES

    A police officer and former Mr Gay UK winner has been charged with a number of sex offences. Pc Mark Carter, 27, was charged following an incident at the Etap hotel in Leeds on 19 December 2009. The serving officer, who was suspended from duty in December, will appear at Leeds Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.

    Pc Carter was crowned Mr Gay UK in 2006 at the Flamingo Club in Blackpool, beating 25 other contestants to win £5,000 worth of prizes. A spokesman for West Yorkshire Police said: "A 27-year-old man has been charged with a number of sexual offences. "He was arrested following a police investigation at the Etap hotel in Leeds on 19 December 2009. "He has been bailed to appear at Leeds Magistrates' Court on 22 June."

  • SOURCE
  • Cop and former Mr Gay UK charged with male rape
  • Cop strips off uniform to become Mr Gay UK
  • MAN WRONGLY JAILED AFTER COPS 'MISTAKES?'
    warren blackwell MASONIC COPS STITCH ANOTHER MAN UP FOR RAPE DESTROYING HIS LIFE

    Mistakes by a police force contributed to an innocent man being jailed for indecent assault, a watchdog has ruled. Warren Blackwell, of Woodford Halse, was jailed having been found guilty of sexually assaulting a woman with a history of false claims against men.

    A report by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) criticised Northamptonshire Police's handling of the case. Mr Blackwell, 40, spent more than three years in jail before being cleared. The IPCC report said a detective was told the woman was "unreliable" and "unstable" but did not pass the information on.

    Delay in apology

    Mr Blackwell was accused of a violent sexual assault by a woman who had suffered mental health problems and had a history of making false allegations. The IPCC report criticised police for failing to challenge discrepancies in the woman's account and for not interviewing witnesses whose evidence would have undermined her claims. The report said one officer, which the IPCC felt should have faced a misconduct hearing, had retired from the force. Two detectives have been given management advice about their conduct.

    "Warren Blackwell was subject to a terrible miscarriage of justice" said Commissioner Amerdeep Somal IPCC

    Mr Blackwell had his conviction overturned by the Court of Appeal in September 2006. Northamptonshire Police only apologised to Mr Blackwell four years after he had been cleared. The IPCC said it was "dismayed" it had taken so long to issue an apology. Mr Blackwell was jailed after a woman claimed he indecently assaulted her outside a social club in the early hours of 1 January, 1999 after a New Year's Eve party.

    Mr Blackwell was convicted in October 1999 at Northampton Crown Court, despite maintaining his innocence. He was jailed for three years - later increased to five. But the conviction was overturned after the case was referred by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). Commissioner Amerdeep Somal, of the IPCC, said: "As the Court of Appeal has ruled, Warren Blackwell was subject to a terrible miscarriage of justice. "Nothing can bring back the three years four months he wrongly spent in prison.

    She said a request that the Chief Constable withdraw a commendation given to the detective constable by the former Chief Constable for the original investigation had not been accepted. She also expressed her "deep dissatisfaction" for the "unacceptable" length of time the force had taken to resolve disciplinary matters. "Such unnecessary delay is neither in the public interest, nor in the interest of all those involved, including the police officers," she said. In October 2006, Mr Blackwell's accuser was named in the House of Lords by Labour peer Lord Campbell-Savours during exchanges about the rape laws.

  • SOURCE
  • RUTHLESS SEATTLE COPS TREATMENT OF BLACK WOMEN'S MINOR OFFENCES VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • Seattle police officials said Tuesday that their officers are trained to throw a punch in certain situations, but said they have a "number of concerns" regarding the tactics an officer used in dealing with a 17-year-old girl he punched in the face while trying to cite a group of women for jaywalking.

    "The issue we have to investigate is whether the force he used is reasonable given the combative resistance he was facing... and we're not going to pass judgment on that until the matter has been thoroughly investigated," said Assistant Seattle Police Chief Nick Metz. Seattle police have directed a review of Seattle police tactics and training to ensure the training and implementation of those tactics are appropriate and consistent, Metz said. The review comes in the wake of an altercation captured on video that shows Officer Ian Walsh punching the teenage girl in the face while struggling to get her and another teen under control in South Seattle.

    The incident began when Walsh spotted four young women jaywalking the 3100 block of Martin Luther King, Jr. Way S. Walsh asked the group to step over to his patrol car, but the women were being "verbally antagonistic toward the officer," according to officials. Police said the 19-year-old woman, identified in documents as Marilyn Levias, was resisting when Walsh tried to place handcuffs on her. Officials said the 17-year-old girl intervened and placed her hands on Walsh's arm, "causing the officer to believe she was attempting to physically affect the first subject's escape," police said.

    Walsh pushed back the second girl, but the girl came back at him. Walsh then punched her, police said. Metz said Walsh will be transferred to a training section and the department will conduct an internal review. "The officer is going to be transferred to the training section for a few days to review the tactics that he's been taught," Metz said. "The issue we have to investigate is whether the force he used is reasonable given the combative resistance he was facing. We're not going to pass judgment on that until the matter has been thoroughly investigated." Veteran police trainer: Officer was 'well within scope' of appropriate response.

    A 30 year veteran of law enforcement training told KOMO News Tuesday Walsh was "well within the scope of appropriate responses to the situation." Robert Bragg, the program manager for Fitness and Force Training, said a blow to the face is also within the scope of their training and would be considered a "reasonable response". It was a potentially threatening situation for the officer, Bragg said, not only with respect to the physical actions of the two women involved but also the group of on-lookers surrounding them and the comments they were making. Bragg said one area where the officer might have done better was in getting control of the first woman faster. He says Walsh should probably have taken her to the ground quickly instead of trying to cuff her standing up.

    Metz: Situation could have been easily defused

    Metz said his department has been proactive in reaching out to the African-American community over this recent incident, but added the two women bear some responsibility for their actions because "even if you believe an arrest is unlawful, it does not give you the right to resist." He added the situation could have been defused if the women had just cooperated. "It certainly would have not escalated to what it did and the these women have to bear much of the responsibility in the altercation that occurred," Metz said. But at a press conference later Tuesday, leaders of the Urban League and NAACP said the officer's reaction didn't fit the action, and that the punching was extreme, even if it was a taught tactic.

    "That appears to be an overreaction to what appears to be a nonviolent jaywalking situation," said James Kelly, President and CEO of the Urban League of Seattle. "Unfortunately this seems to become too far and too often of the typical police response. The provocation of the 17-year-old may have presented a confrontation situation but the violence in the form of a full-blown fist to the face was wrong. "This is another case where we stand here and say to the police, 'Shame on you.' " Kelly added that while he wasn't making excuses for the way the 17-year-old acted, two wrongs don't make a right. "The overreaction of non violent situation should be the last resort, not standard police practice," Kelly said.

    He called upon Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn and the two candidates for Seattle police chief to determine how to "put an end to this kind of overreaction." "If not, the video will keep playing and the world will keep wondering how we've lost our niceness to Seattle." Both teens were cited for jaywalking. Levias was booked into the King County Jail for investigation of obstructing an officer and released on her own recognizance. Her next court appearance is scheduled for Thursday. The 17-year-old girl was booked into the Youth Service Center for investigation of assault of an officer. Nobody was injured during the incident, police said.
    SEATTLE COP BRUTALITY AT PROTEST OVER BLACK GIRL PUNCHED BY COP VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MET COPS INVESTIGATED OVER DRUG DEALING AND CORRUPTION
    Neighbourhood police probed over drug dealing, corruption and misconduct

    Met's Safer Neighbourhood officers are under investigation for offences including alleged corruption, dealing in Class A drugs and failing to undertake their duties. Two police community support officers and a woman police constable have been arrested. Three others, a PCSO and two police officers, including a sergeant, have been warned they are being investigated for misconduct. All are members of the Mottingham and Chislehurst North Safer Neighbourhood unit in Bromley. Based in Chislehurst High Street, it is responsible for street patrols and investigates anti-social behaviour and burglary.

    The inquiry follows the arrest of a PCSO on suspicion of supplying Class A drugs last Tuesday. The PCSO, who has since been suspended, was also arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office and harbouring an offender. A woman police constable, a second PCSO and a member of the public were arrested yesterday by members of the Directorate of Professional Standards. They were held on suspicion of misconduct in a public office and attempting to pervert the course of justice. The second male PCSO was questioned over claims he undertook police checks on people on behalf of his colleague arrested on drugs allegations.

    The woman Pc was arrested on suspicion of falsifying information about speeding points on behalf of her partner. This is not linked to the drug-dealing inquiry. Three others, a male sergeant, a male Pc and a male PCSO, all in their thirties. have been formally notified they are subject to a misconduct investigation. This centres on claims they failed to undertake their duties properly, including allegations they did not spend enough time on patrol. The PCSO has been suspended and the sergeant and constable have been placed on restricted duties. This is not a criminal inquiry. Three further suspects, none of whom are Met employees, were also arrested last week on suspicion of conspiracy to supply class A drugs. The men, in their twenties, have been released on police bail. Bromley Borough Commander Charles Griggs said other safer neighbourhood teams will undertake the Chislehurst High Street unit's duties while the inquiry takes place.

  • SOURCE
  • COP OFFERED SEX IN PLACE OF MOTORING OFFENCES
    jamie slater A traffic police officer has been jailed for having sex with female drivers in exchange for excusing their motoring offences.

    Jamie Slater, 33, of Port Talbot, was sentenced to three and a half years at Cardiff Crown Court for misconduct while in public office. He contacted the women after stopping them and offered to let them off if they had sex with him. Slater was dismissed from South Wales Police in December.

    The court heard how the South Wales Police officer used the police national computer to access personal data on his victims. The married father-of-two stopped six women for minor motoring offences and requested their mobile phone numbers. He later sent the women drivers text messages asking them to meet him for sex. The court heard Slater harassed women who refused to meet him.

    Peter Davies, prosecuting, said all Slater's victims had felt powerless to complain because he was a police officer in uniform. He told the court how one woman was driving with only a provisional licence when Slater asked her to stop. He said: "He told her he would have to retain and impound the motor car she was driving. "This caused her to be upset and she began crying." She agreed to give Slater her number so her car was not impounded. The court heard they began an affair and once met for sex while Slater was on duty and he received an emergency call on the police radio. He then took part in a pursuit while the woman was hiding in his patrol car, the court was told. Mr Davies added that when the woman's husband found out about the affair, Slater looked him up on the police database and sent him taunting texts.

    Another victim was pulled over for jumping a red light and was also asked to give Slater her phone number. He later used the number to send her graphic text messages. Mr Davies said: "She was left scared and upset and said she will never get into a police vehicle again, having lost faith in the police force."

    'Rotten apple'

    Sentencing Slater, Mr Justice Lloyd Jones said he acted in "a particularly predatory manner." He added: "These offences were deeply stressful to the victims. "They felt powerless because you were a police officer. "Your activities have caused immense damage to the public confidence to South Wales Police." Tom Crowther, defending, said Slater was full of remorse for his actions. He said: "It was his long-standing ambition to be a police officer and the fulfilment of a dream." Slater earlier admitted eight charges of misconduct in public office relating to eight different women.

    Tom Davies, Independent Police Complaints Commissioner for Wales, reassured the public this was a rare case. He said: "Slater was a disgrace to all who work for the police service and abused the position of trust a serving police officer is given." He added: "Slater was a rotten apple and acted alone."

  • SOURCE
  • COP JAILED FOR GROOMING 13 YEAR OLD GIRL ON THE INTERNET
    russell west THESE ARE THE SAME THUG COPS INVOLVED IN FAMILY COURT DISPUTES WERE CHILDREN ARE BEING REMOVED FROM THE PROTECTION OF THEIR BIOLOGICAL FATHERS BY COPS, MANY WHO HAVE ULTERIOR MOTIVES. THE STATE PREFERING COPS LIKE THIS WHO HAVE WORKED ON CHILD PROTECTION DUTIES THAN THE PROTECTION OF A CHILD'S OWN FATHER. WE HAVE DOCUMENTED PROOF OF TWO MALE POLICE OFFICERS REMOVING A FEMALE CHILD FROM THE FATHER WITHOUT ANY FEMALE COP PRESENT.THE EXCUSE BEING THEY DIDN'T HAVE SUFFICIENT FEMALES COPS ON DUTY.

    A former police officer has been jailed for 30 months after taking part in indecent chats on the internet with a 13-year-old girl.

    Russell West, 26, admitted last month that he had sent sexual messages to the Clackmannanshire schoolgirl. West, an officer for Essex Police at the time, was traced after she went missing and her computer was checked by specialist detectives. He has been placed on the sex offenders register for life.

    Temporary judge Michael O'Grady QC said: "You pled guilty to indecent behaviour over a fairly lengthy period towards a young and self-evidently vulnerable girl." The judge said he had concerns about the lengths to which the former police officer had gone to cover his tracks. The court heard in May that West had used a false name to register with an online chat service and used a pay-as-you-go dongle to connect to the internet. Judge O'Grady said he accepted that West had made no attempt to meet up with the schoolgirl.

    Computer search

    But he added it was clear that the first offender, who resigned from Essex Police as soon as the crime was detected, still posed a risk. The court heard that West would have been jailed for three years, but for his guilty plea. West will be supervised for three years following his release and was warned he could be returned to custody during that period if he failed to comply with release conditions.

    Advocate depute Derek Ogg QC said the offence came to light after a search of the missing girl's computer revealed a large number of internet contacts - some of a serious nature. He said: "There is no suggestion that West's conversation was anything other than fantasy chat. There were no practical attempts to seek a meeting."

    Attack threat

    West targeted the girl after meeting her on an internet chatroom where he used the name "Fit Essex Guy". In messages the girl said she was 13 and at school. The investigation into West was part of a major inquiry, codenamed Operation Defender, into internet sex offences against children. Defence counsel Tom Ross said: "Apart from the commission of this offence he has led a wholly law-abiding existence and contributed to the community through his service in the police force."

    West has been held in prison on remand since October last year and Mr Ross said it had been "a very uncomfortable time for him" because he was an inmate charged with a sexual offence against a child and a police officer. He added: "There has been the daily possibility of attack."

  • SOURCE
  • ANGER OVER £2,000,000 PAID TO SUSPENDED COPS
    northern cops

    Freemasonry dominates the control of cops in Northern Scotland and the main reason they are getting away with MURDER

    £783,233 BILL FOR TAYSIDE FORCE’S OFFICERS ON ‘GARDENING LEAVE’

    The north and north-east’s police forces have spent more than £2million paying officers to stay at home and do nothing. The huge bill includes the salaries for 21 members of staff suspended from Northern Constabulary, Grampian Police and Tayside Police for more than year. A total of 77 officers have been suspended from the three forces over the last 10 years for offences including assault, corruption, or for “conduct likely to bring discredit” to their employers.

    Each of them was placed on fully-paid “gardening leave” while complaints against them were investigated. They include Ewan McHardy, a former Grampian officer who was convicted of trying to pervert the course of justice by watering down a urine sample after being accused of drink-driving in Elgin. It is understood he was suspended on full pay for five years and 17 days before he quit the force after his trial at Inverness last year. The statistics have been provided in response to freedom of information requests submitted by the P&J and last night they sparked criticism from the Taxpayers Alliance.

    A spokesman said: “Leaving officers sitting around at home on full pay doesn’t help anybody. If they have been suspended because of a serious offence then that should be dealt with and they should be sacked swiftly. “If they’re innocent they certainly should not be left in limbo for months or even years. Taxpayers can’t afford for police budgets to be paid to people in return for literally no work.” The Association for Chief Police Officers in Scotland (Acpos) said it was working with the Scottish Police Federation and the Scottish Government to try to “improve our existing processes”.

    North-east MSP Richard Baker, Labour’s shadow justice secretary, said he had written to the Scottish Government about the issue but had not been told if there had been any progress. Thirty-seven police officers have been suspended from Tayside Police over the last 10 years, including four for more than a year and four for more than two years. The force’s wage bill for suspended officers stands at £783,233. Among the reasons for the suspensions were assault, “conduct likely to bring discredit”, being found guilty of a criminal offence and “corrupt practices”. The force said 27 of the officers later resigned or were dismissed. Northern Constabulary said that, since 2004, it had stopped 15 officers from working, including one who began a suspension lasting two years and 236 days in 2006. That officer is one of five suspended for more than a year since 2005. Nine have either resigned or been sacked in that time and the wage bill for the suspended staff has now reached £425,463.

    Dismissed

    Grampian has spent £798,000 on the wages of 22 suspended officers since December 2003, including eight who have been off work for more than a year. Twelve officers have since resigned and three were dismissed. While Ewan McHardy was not allowed back in the uniform for more than five years, another Grampian officer was suspended from duty for three years and 99 days.

    Caroline Scott, general secretary of Acpos, said: “The financial cost of such suspensions and the length of time it can take to conclude proceedings is recognised by the police service as not being in the interests of the service or the individual concerned. “Work is actively being progressed in conjunction with the Scottish Police Federation, the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents and the Scottish Government to consider the changes necessary to improve our existing processes, with a view to reducing the time it can take to conclude misconduct proceedings.”

  • SOURCE
  • BRITISH COPS TO COMPENSATE STOP AND SEARCH CLIMATE CAMP TWINS AGED 13
    Police have agreed to compensate three people - including 13-year-old twins - who were unlawfully stopped and searched at a climate camp protest, lawyers said.

    Thousands of other people, who were wrongly apprehended under controversial counter-terrorism legislation, could also be in line for payouts. An urgent review was launched after officials discovered 14 forces had failed to get the correct authorisation for operations that allow them to stop members of the public without reason. They found 40 operations dating back to 2001 where police who were granted powers to use section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 had no legal basis after they applied for an invalid timescale or were not countersigned quickly enough.

    Meanwhile, it has emerged that the Chief Constable of Kent Police has apologised about a stop-and-search operation in August 2008. Twins, then aged 11, were stopped while attending a demonstration against the proposed and highly-controversial Kingsnorth coal-fired power station in Kent. The children and a third person, long-standing environmental campaigner David Morris, from north London, brought the legal action against the police. All three were searched under section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, which requires officers to have "reasonable suspicion" that an individual is carrying prohibited weapons or articles that could be used for criminal damage. The twins and Mr Morris were among 10,000 protesters who were processed through airport-style "checkpoints" and their lawyers told the High Court in January that some 3,550 were subjected to unlawful searches as part of a £5.3 million police operation. Their solicitor, John Halford, of Bindmans LLP, said: "Kent Police has been forced to make a remarkable admission, thanks to this test case.

    "It is that the outcome of one of the most expensive policing operations ever in the UK was a massive violation of the human right to protest." As part of the settlement, campaigners said damages would be paid to the trio. Kent Police assistant chief constable Andy Adams said "a number" of searches should not have happened at Kingsnorth.

    "We attempted to engage with the organisers of Climate Camp and, despite their refusal to co-operate, we did allow a peaceful protest to take place," he said. "The publicly declared aim of some protesters was to break into Kingsnorth Power Station, an action which could have had the consequence of disrupting power supplies to a great number of people in Kent and could also have caused death or serious injury to anyone trespassing on the site." He added: "We have accepted that many people were searched as a result of officer briefings which took place at the time of Climate Camp. "A number of these searches should not have happened."

    Earlier this year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that indiscriminate section 44 searches were illegal but they remained in place while the Government sought permission to appeal. The coalition Government has already ordered a wide-ranging review of counter-terrorism legislation and pledged to introduce safeguards to prevent misuse of invasive powers. Campaigners, who have already highlighted how the powers are often used against demonstrators and photographers, said the "dangerous and undemocratic law" must be dumped immediately.

    The discovery came after the Metropolitan Police, which is responsible for about nine out of 10 section 44 searches, began to investigate a request under the Freedom of Information Act. Officials found former Home Secretary David Blunkett had not signed an authorisation form for an April 2004 operation in which 840 people were stopped within the 48 hour deadline. This sparked an internal Home Office review which uncovered a further 36 cases of dodgy authorisations, including 35 occasions when forces asked for a search window in excess of the maximum 28 days.

  • SOURCE
  • UK THUG MASONIC COPS AND THEIR ILLEGAL USE OF TERRORISM LAWS EXPOSED VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • Police to compensate stop-and-search climate camp twins, 13

  • BRITAIN'S POLICE STATE WERE MASONIC COPS ARE GETTING AWAY WITH UTTER MURDER
    HOMOSEXUAL COP USED FORCES COMPUTER TO GET DETAILS OF MEN HE HAD SEX WITH
    haydn evans The dangers of the rise of the gay mafia within the masonic run British police forces.

    A MARRIED police officer is facing the sack for using the force computer to get details on men he had illicit sex sessions with, a court has heard.

    PC Haydn Evans, 55, an officer with South Wales Police, admitted illegally using the police national computer to check on six men after having sexual encounters with them. Swansea-based PC Evans, a respected officer married for 31 years with two adult sons, led a double life unknown to his family and police colleagues. He met men in a series of gay haunts then used the police database to check on their health records, criminal convictions and addresses.

    The court heard he also made unauthorised checks to see if colleagues had spotted his car in “areas known for homosexual activity”. Father-of-two PC Evans hoped to keep the affairs from his family – but admitted his secret gay sex life just hours before appearing in court yesterday. PC Evans, who has been a policeman for 28 years with the South Wales force, admitted 12 charges of causing a computer to perform a function to obtain withheld data.

    Prosecutor Rob Simkin said: “He made searches on seven people – six of whom belong to the homosexual community. “They were interviewed and said they met him during his social life. “He was arrested and said he accessed the computer system to obtain information about men he’d had sexual encounters with. “He provided different explanations, saying he wanted to check their health status and that he was checking contact details after losing them from his telephone. “PC Evans also accepted undertaking general searches on the computer for ‘homosexuals’ and ‘gay guy’. “He admitted these were to provide his own personal interest and gratification.”

    Magistrates in Newport heard Evans had served most of his career with the Swansea division of South Wales Police and worked as a community and local intelligence officer. The court heard he was suspended from South Wales Police pending investigation and faces an internal disciplinary hearing which could see him lose his job. Andrew Nutman, defending, said: “He accepts it was unlawful access and he regrets that. “He is a married man of 31 years but regrettably his wife and two adult sons were unaware of these matters. “This morning he had to telephone family members and discuss deeply personal matters.

    “Whatever the sentence, the real sanction will take place beyond these doors.” PC Evans, who gave his address as the South Wales Police Federation, was handed a conditional discharge and ordered to pay £85 costs. Magistrates chairman Paul Lovin said: “The greatest punishment to you is you’re still subject to police disciplinary action and the effect this will have on your family.” Following the hearing, a spokesman for South Wales Police said: “We will always undertake swift and robust action when investigating allegations of staff misconduct. “Any police officer or staff member that abuses the trust instilled in them by South Wales Police can expect to be thoroughly investigated by our Professional Standards Department. As this case demonstrates, those who fail to meet the high standards that the police service and the public demand will face appearing before a criminal court or an internal misconduct hearing.”

  • SOURCE
  • 'Family man' cop faces sack for illegally using police computer to check up on gay lovers
  • OFF-DUTY COP KILLS UNARMED FORMER MARINE AFTER DISPUTE AT CLUB VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • Tyrone Brown, a 32-year-old former Marine from East Baltimore, was out with his sister and her friend enjoying the Mount Vernon club scene early Saturday when he may have taken one of his trademark jokes too far. Glancing at a woman in an alley off East Eager Street, he put his hands on her behind.

    Police said the woman's companion, an off-duty Baltimore police officer, got into an argument an More..d physical confrontation with Brown after they left the club Eden's Lounge. His sister said there was no fight, and that her brother apologized and tried to walk away. What happened next is not in dispute — the officer pulled out his department-issued Glock handgun and fired at the unarmed Brown 13 times from just a few feet away. Brown, struck at 1:30 a.m. by six bullets in the chest and groin, fell to the pavement and died 45 minutes later at Maryland Shock Trauma Center. The shooting by Gahiji A. Tshamba, a 15-year veteran of the city police force, has left his commanders publicly questioning whether the Eastern District patrol officer legitimately thought his life was in danger before firing. Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi, using unusually harsh language, said witnesses confirmed that Brown "groped the woman," but he also stressed that homicide detectives have "not been able to find a concrete motive" as to why Tshamba fired his weapon. Police commanders said privately that they were troubled by Saturday's shooting, which took place near a rear door of Club Hippo. It raised numerous questions, they said, including whether the officer had been drinking and was impaired when he fired his gun, and why he did not call for help from the many on-duty officers stationed nearby.

    Brown's father — one of many relatives and friends who gathered Saturday at an East Baltimore rowhouse the victim shared with his mother — said the shooting was unjustifiable. "He was in a situation where an apology should have been accepted," Reginald Dargan said. "It's a young kid — gone for nothing. It don't make no sense." A department spokesman said Tshamba has been involved in at least one prior police-involved shooting. In 1998, he shot a man in the back during a foot chase, according to The Baltimore Sun's archives. Baltimore police officers are generally required to carry their service weapons while on and off duty when they're within the city limits. There are no rules prohibiting officers from carrying guns into bars, but it is against department regulations to be intoxicated or inebriated while armed. Police officials said if an officer plans on drinking while off duty, common sense dictates leaving the gun secured and at home.

    Guglielmi said the police commissioner was apprised of developments throughout the night and the commissioner ordered "his most trusted people" to ensure a thorough investigation. The spokesman said the officer refused to make a statement and declined to submit to a breath test to determine whether he had been drinking alcohol or how much he had consumed. Tshamba, who lives in Essex, could not be reached for comment. He is being represented by an attorney for the city's Fraternal Order of Police, whose president on Saturday urged the public to "not rush to any judgment."

    Robert Cherry, the union head and a former homicide detective, said Tshamba plans to give a statement to investigators after consulting with his attorney. He is not required to say anything to investigators, as is the right of any person subjected to a criminal investigation. "The officer has not yet had an opportunity to give his version of events," Cherry said. "There may be videos to review. There may be many more witnesses to interview. … The refusal by him to give a statement is not something that should raise people's concerns that he is trying to hide something." A night out on the town brought Tshamba and Brown together early Saturday. Relatives and police said both men wound up at Eden's Lounge, though the owner denied that the officer had been in his club. Baltimore Police Maj. Terrence McLarney, head of the homicide unit, said there is no indication the two men met inside the establishment or knew each other.

    It's unclear when each group left, but police said they were out by 1:30 a.m. and in a crowd of boisterous patrons spilling out of bars and nightclubs in the neighborhood known for late-night revelry. They found themselves in an alley off East Eager Street, near the back of Club Hippo. Brown's sister, Chantay Kangalee, 30, of Baltimore County, said her brother put his hands on the behind of one of the women with the officer. "He was just joking," Kangalee said. "That was just my brother's sense of humor. I said, 'Stop that.' " The woman he had grabbed also spoke up, Kangalee said: "She said, 'Don't do that. That's disrespectful.' He said, 'My bad.' And then we were about to turn and go to the car and she walked up and swung at him." Then the officer stepped up, she said.

    "The guy pulled out his gun and he said, 'Do it again. Do it again,' " she said. " 'Now get on the ground.' " Kangalee said Brown put his hands in the air and started backing up, saying, " 'Wait a minute. Hold up.' " And then the officer started shooting, Kangalee said. McLarney said Tshamba identified himself as a police officer and gave "verbal commands" to Brown to stop fighting. Guglielmi said "the incident escalated into a verbal argument which turned physical" before the officer fired his gun.

    A patrol officer standing in an alley off East Eager Street, used by officers to park their vehicles, heard the gunfire and quickly responded. "The guy was in no harm, no danger," Kangalee said, disputing that he identified himself as an officer. "He could see he had no weapon, nothing." If the investigation determines that the shooting was not justified, Tshamba could face criminal charges. Tshamba has been investigated multiple times by the department, including for a July 1998 incident in which he shot a man in the back. Police at the time said he responded to a shooting and an armed robbery of a man in East Baltimore. One officer chased a man up one street and Tshamba chased a second man along another street. The first officer fired his weapon when the suspect pulled a gun from his pants, but missed his target. Police said at the time that Tshamba heard the shot, thought the man he was chasing had fired and shot him.

    The wounded man, who survived, had been armed with a silver-colored, semiautomatic handgun, but had not pointed it at Tshamba, according to a police spokeswoman at the time. The outcome of the internal investigation could not be learned on Saturday. In March 1999, Tshamba was among 42 officers and civilians honored at an awards ceremony for acts of heroism, leadership and civic-mindedness. He was one of 20 officers given a bronze star for meritorious performance. Brown grew up in East Baltimore and graduated in 1994 from what was then Southern High School, where he played lacrosse and football. He went on to serve eight years in the Marines, half of them in Iraq. He was there from 2001 to 2005, said his mother, Vivian Scott.

    "His company was one of the first that went into Fallujah," she said, adding that her son was reluctant to talk about his experiences. "It took a while for him to, you know, start opening up. … I kept pounding and pounding him, 'Open up.' He just broke and cried. He said, 'It was so much we went through. I can't tell you.' " The aftereffects of the war took a toll on his marriage, his mother said, and he separated from his wife and moved back home with his mother. She eventually convinced him to seek counseling through Veterans Affairs and he was trying to reconcile with his wife, Scott said. Brown, his wife and their 8-year-old daughter, Jade, were scheduled to fly to San Diego Thursday to attend the 8th-grade graduation of his 14-year-old son from a previous relationship. Brown had most recently worked as a maintenance man at the city jail and had nearly completed his coursework at a technical school to become an electrician, relatives said. He had no criminal record but for a 5-year-old charge, eventually dropped, for possessing an open container of alcohol in public. Relatives who gathered at the North Broadway home remembered a die-hard Orioles fan and grilling enthusiast known as much for his excessive use of charcoal lighter fluid than for any food he produced. "He was supposed to be walking me down the aisle next month when I get married," said a sister, La-Belle Scott.
    COPS KILL SUSPECT WITH TASER AT THE EDGE OF CLIFF TOP VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • UNARMED TEEN TASERED BY ARMED COPS AT FUNERAL OF STAB VICTIM
    Unarmed teen Tasered by armed police at West Norwood wake of Croydon's Wesley Sterling

    An unarmed teenage mourner at the wake of a 16-year-old stab victim was Tazered by armed police who suspected he was carrying a gun. The 17-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was Tazered in front of dozens of funeral-goers outside the wake of Croydon teenager Wesley Sterling at Nettlefold Hall in West Norwood last Thursday. Shocked guests and family members told a public meeting on Tuesday how they watched on as police grabbed the unarmed youth, using the 50,000 volt stun device on him up to six times.

    The youth’s family is reported to be considering making an official complaint to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) about the officers’ conduct. Police said they were called to Norwood Road at 8pm after reports of a group of young men carrying a firearm. The Tazered youth was arrested and charged with the public order offence of provocation of violence and obstructing police. No further arrests were made. The teen will appear this morning at Camberwell Green Magistrates Court for a bail hearing. Hundreds of guests were at the party by West Norwood library after attending Wesley Sterling's funeral in Croydon earlier in the day.

    Wesley, a promising footballer, was stabbed to death outside a party at the Croydon Sports Arena on April 18. Carleto Salmons, 27, of Heath Road, Thornton Heath, has been charged with his murder.

  • SOURCE
  • COP WHO HEADED CHILD ABUSE UNIT ACCUSED OF SEX OFFENCES AGAINST YOUNG GIRLS
    glen boulton A police officer who headed a child abuse investigation unit is facing a string of child sex offence charges, it has emerged.

    Detective Inspector Glen Boulton of West Midlands Police is accused of six sex offences involving two girls aged under 16. The 44-year-old from Solihull appeared at Wolverhampton Magistrates' Court on May 11 charged with four counts of indecent assault and two counts of indecency with a child. He is due to reappear at the same court next month.

    The alleged offences date back to between 1977 and 1982. DI Boulton was manager of a child abuse investigation unit in Solihull between November 2008 and February 2009. A police spokesman said: 'Given that criminal proceedings are now live we will not comment further at this stage.'

  • SOURCE
  • Cop charged with six alleged sex offences
  • CRIME PAYS BUT ONLY FOR THOSE THAT POLICE IT
    evil masons There are a few key positions in society that are interested in the proliferation of crime, as that has great advantages for their financial interests and job security. Cops, lawyers , judges , social services and prisons guards all have an interest in protecting their jobs and pension rights, something that would disappear if crime was greatly reduced.We have a growing body of evidence that proves the very people charged with the protection of the public, at ENORMOUS cost to the public purse, are in fact the biggest and most dangerous criminals of all.

    The masonic satanic order has massively corrupted police forces and the main cause of the ever increasing crime wave within those forces were they cover each others ass , when questions get asked about their conduct. With tier upon tier of regulators all controlled from the masonic centres of power were corruption and fraud are rife that leaves the long suffering public with out of control cops who have a very warped agenda of what their real roles are supposed to be.

    The state and its political system has also been dominated by hand picked masonic goons who bend to all arms of a legal mafia that ensure their financial priorities come above all else. The British crown that dominates legal systems across the globe maybe the most dangerous force on the planet using their masonic plants in every area of law and order to thieve our land, business and property. The Bar associations worldwide that are all controlled from temple bar in London, the knights templar centre for the evil tentacles of masonic power , circle the globe in an ever expanding behemoth devouring everything in its path . A monopoly that controls all land , property and business transactions globally, as without their dodgy contracts none of those transactions could take place. Only a global withdrawal from this massive worldwide scam can see its collapse and victims would stop losing their lifes work thanks to the evil scumbags dominating the crime wave that makes all other crime pale by comparison.

    Every man should know that placing their trust and money in the hands of the mobsters who run the courts can only guarantee their demise due to the ruthless repossession (theft) of everything they deal in. They sell you land , business and property under the guise you own it when the equally corrupt dodgy mortgages the banks create with lawyers help, ensure at some point they will retake possession of anything you are sold, or are given the impression you are sold. Only those who have sold their souls to this global satanic network have any hope in hell of holding on to their assets , but at an enormous cost to their spirit and likely most of what they have accumulated has come from the redistribution of the wealth stolen from their victims.

    Crime really does pay for those who have taken crime prevention to a new level, when they themselves are the ultimate criminals. No one could truly believe the utter depths and enormity of this global conspiracy.
    COPS CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH FINES
    Police cannot be trusted to hand out summary justice and will act as “judge and jury” if given powers to issue more on-the-spot fines, magistrates have warned.

    In an extraordinary attack, the Magistrates’ Association said it is a “certainty” that officers will misuse powers because they cannot be “relied on” to handle them appropriately. The comments have been made as part of the Magistrates’ Association response to the Government’s plans to allow police to issue £60 fixed penalties for careless driving. Police have been accused of increasingly dealing with offences using on-the-spot fines as an easy way to hit the government’s crime targets.

    Magistrates are worried that the number of offences now dealt with in this way is keeping some serious offenders out of the courts. However, police leaders insisted that the use of the fines, which has risen sharply under Labour, helped to reduce paperwork and free up officers’ time. It leaves two of the key bodies responsible for tackling crime and administering justice at loggerheads. MPs expressed surprise that magistrates would have accused police of being untrustworthy.

    Alun Michael, a Labour member of the Commons justice committee and former policing minister, said such “grandstanding” was not helpful and both parties needed to address the issue. Paul Holmes, a Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: “It is a sorry state of affairs when the Government’s push for instant justice is driving a wedge between different parts of our criminal justice system. “The police have been given wide-ranging powers without adequate debate. It is deeply concerning that even judges think they will abuse them.” Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, added: “This is the reality of a criminal justice system after a decade of government interference in policing.”

    The Government’s proposals would make careless driving a fixed penalty offence, meaning those guilty being handed an on-the-spot fine and given three points on their licence. Currently, those suspected of careless driving are prosecuted in the courts where they can face a fine of up to £5,000 and up to nine points on their licence. Chris Hunt Cooke, chairman of the Magistrates’ Association road traffic committee warned against this. In his response, he said: “Regrettably, recent experience with out-of-court disposals shows that the police cannot be relied on to use them appropriately or as intended. “Once they have been given these powers, the police will misuse them, that is a certainty, and careless driving will be generally treated as a minor offence, unless serious injury is involved. “This is a proposal that places the convenience of the police above what is right in principle, may coerce innocent drivers into accepting a fixed penalty, and is certain generally to downgrade careless driving in terms of offence seriousness.”

    Mr Hunt Cooke, a magistrate for 13 years, said the offence is a subjective matter, unlike speeding or driving with no insurance, and any judgement of how serious that is should be made in a courtroom. He said police officers will be “prosecutor, judge and jury, deciding on guilt and then sentencing the offence” . “Faced with the choice between the heavy burden of taking the matter to court and the simplicity of issuing a fixed penalty, it is certain that many police officers will opt for a fixed penalty, however bad the driving may be.”

    The Association of Chief Police Officers refused to address the accusations that officers could not be trusted to administer fines appropriately. However, Mick Giannasi, Gwent Chief Constable who is in charge of roads policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said: “By dealing with offences in this way, it can result in a reduction in the amount of time that police officers spend completing paperwork and attending court, while also reducing the burden on the courts and the taxpayer.” Hundreds of thousands of fixed penalties are handed out by police every year, including almost 1.5 million for speeding offences alone. Police have been given increasing powers to hand out fines since Labour took power in 1997, mainly through the introduction of the penalty notice for disorder in 2004.

    The fines can be handed out for so-called “low-level” offending such as littering, criminal damage, being drunk and disorderly and shoplifting. The number of such fines has increased more than three-fold from 63,639 in 2004 to 207,544 in 2007, the most recent figures available. The Magistrates’ Association has already said fines are being used for “inappropriate offences”, including a warning that too many shoplifters are avoiding court by being handed them. Earlier this month, the Commons Justice Committee described the growth in out-of-court penalties as a “fundamental change” to criminal justice.

    Mr Michael said it would be “nonsense” to roll back time but both the magistrates and police “need to understand why there is an issue here”. He added: “It is not helpful to have this sort of grandstanding, whether it is from the Magistrates’ Association or from Acpo. “It is an issue but it is not a cataclysmic case for a major division between the magistrates and the police.” The Department for Transport is due to report back on its proposals to make careless driving a fixed penalty offence later this year.

    It has already been criticised by taxpayer groups and motoring campaigners who warned police will take the easy option of handing out fines. They also warned minor accidents and many trivial motoring offences, such as eating, drinking or smoking at the wheel, could lead to fines. Careless driving covers a wide range of behaviour from minor inattention to driving that is only just below the level of dangerous. The Magistrates Association fears drivers who believe they are innocent will not risk challenging the fines in court while those guilty of serious offences just short of dangerous driving will escape harsher punishment.

    A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: “Bad driving puts other drivers, cyclists and pedestrians at risk. “Making careless driving a fixed penalty offence would help the police to enforce against bad drivers who admit fault with a minimum of bureaucracy, freeing up police resources. “But all drivers would always have the option to contest their case in court and we would work with the police and the courts to develop guidance to ensure that cases are handled correctly.”

  • SOURCE
  • COPS KEEP SECRET FILES ON 1,900 PROTESTERS
    The police are keeping secret intelligence files and photographs of nearly 1,900 so-called domestic extremists, it can be revealed.

    Details of the intelligence and pictures gathered at marches and other demonstrations comes as the new Government questions whether civil liberties and the right to peaceful protest have been eroded by New Labour’s extension of police and anti-terrorist legislation. The information has been built up by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), Britain’s most powerful national policing body, whose future is in doubt after it was revealed that it was being run as a private company.

    After taking over MI5’s covert role watching groups such as the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, trade union activists and Left-wing journalists six years ago, ACPO’s National Coordinator for Domestic Extremism (NCDE) has now given a detailed description of its work for the first time. It says it is targeting domestic extremism ‘most commonly associated with “single-issue” protests, such as animal rights, environmentalism, anti-globalisation or anti-GM crops’. It is also combating ‘crime and public disorder linked to extreme Left or Right-wing political campaigns’. The details of the NCDE’s role have been posted on ACPO’s website. It states: ‘Clearly, the majority of people involved in animal rights, environmentalism and other campaigns are peaceful protesters and never considered “extremist’’. The term only applies to individuals or groups whose activities go outside the normal democratic process and engage in crime and disorder in order to further their campaign.’

    It says those targeted are behind public disorder offences, malicious letters and emails, blackmail, product contamination, damage to property and the use of improvised explosive devices. The £9million-a-year unit, which has a staff of 100 including around 70 police, holds photos and other background details on 1,822 individuals.

    It says: ‘Considering this is a national database...this is a very small number of people.’ Most files and photographs are ‘only retained for a short period’, although some are held for ‘several years’. The information comes from police forces and is collated from other sources, including the media, to build up a picture of ‘extremist’ activity. The unit, headed by Assistant Chief Constable Anton Setchell, denies allegations that it is stifling lawful protest. It says: ‘Thousands of people take part in protests across the country each year and NCDE fully supports people’s rights to democratically express their views on issues they feel strongly about.’

  • SOURCE
  • CHILDREN'S COMMISSIONER ASKS COPS TO STOP USING TASERS
    Scotland’s children’s champion has called for the country’s largest police force to scrap a pilot scheme which arms beat police officers with Taser guns.

    Tam Baillie, Scotland’s Commissioner for Children and Young People, said there were no restrictions or safeguards to protect under-18s from being subjected to the 50,000 volts that a Taser gun delivers. His call to suspend the pilot immediately follows warnings last month from Amnesty in Scotland, which said it was unlawful. “Beat officers are being equipped with these potentially lethal weapons with no safeguards in place to protect children and no firm evidence of the physical and mental impacts of their use on under-18s,” said Mr Baillie. “Tasers are potentially lethal – they have been linked to hundreds of adult deaths – and the UN has made it clear that their use on children is unacceptable.

    “Arming beat officers with Tasers brings them into our communities, making them part of everyday life, and risks them being used in situations when lesser force would suffice. Police and Scottish ministers cannot wait until there is a Taser tragedy involving a child to take action on this.” A spokeswoman for Strathclyde Police confirmed the pilot had started on 20 April in two areas, Glasgow city centre and Cambuslang. “There are 30 officers trained in using Tasers, so at any one time there might be four [with Tasers] on duty,” she said. “The pilot project will last until October and will be independently evaluated.”

  • SOURCE
  • TASER COPS BREAKING LAW
    HUMAN rights groups and politicians have demanded that the Scottish Government should halt a police force's pilot Taser stun-gun scheme.

    Human rights organisation Amnesty International has written to justice secretary Kenny MacAskill urging him to stop the trial immediately on the grounds that it was "clearly unlawful" under European law, and hold a public consultation on the role of Strathclyde Police's six-month scheme, which started last month, has issued 30 ordinary police officers with the electroshock weapons, which work at 50,000 volts. Amnesty's legal review of police use of the weapon, carried out by Aidan O'Neill, QC, said a European Court ruling implied that governments had a duty to define the circumstances in which police could use force and guns, and, under firearms legislation, Tasers were classed as weapons.

    He also said that Scottish ministers were required to give written authorisation before any new schemes to arm police officers could take place, and that such authorisation had been obtained for the Strathclyde pilot. So far, Mr MacAskill has insisted that the use of Tasers is an "operational matter" for police. Yesterday, however, both Labour and the Lib Dems called on Mr MacAskill to answer Amnesty's call. Labour's community safety spokesman, James Kelly, MSP, said: "Kenny MacAskill cannot simply duck his ministerial responsibilities. He must take charge of the situation and explain in no uncertain terms the legality of the pilot."

    Liberal Democrat Justice spokesman Robert Brown, MSP, added that Mr MacAskill must take the "policy responsibility" for Tasers. He said: "In England it is the Home Secretary who signs off use of Tasers among police forces, and we want to see this happen in Scotland. "In the light of the doubts about the legal position, the Taser pilot should be halted forthwith until the legal position is sorted out." Green MSP Patrick Harvie, MSP, called the Taser pilot "inappropriate and potentially illegal". Tam Baillie, Scotland's Commissioner for Children & Young People, said clear guidelines about the use of Tasers would benefit both children and police officers: "Police and Scottish ministers cannot wait until there is a Taser tragedy involving a child to take action on this."

    Diego Quiroz, policy officer at the Scottish Human Rights Commission, said that they did not believe that a "human rights framework" setting out the responsibilities of public authorities, such as ministers and the police, had been put in place. They also demanded that the justice minister "should assure himself of any evidence that a further Taser roll-out will comply with human rights obligations". But the Scottish Police Federation, which represents officers under the rank of superintendent, claimed Amnesty was "scaremongering" about police use of Tasers. Chairman Les Gray said: "We believe Tasers will make a significant contribution to protecting the public. It will also help reduce the number of assaults on police officers." In a statement, Strathclyde Police said: "Only 30 officers have been trained to use Tasers and there will only be four officers in the Strathclyde Force area carrying Tasers at any one time. The pilot will be fully and independently evaluated."

  • SOURCE
  • Children’s commissioner asks police force to stop using Tasers
  • WHITE COP CONFESSES HE SHOT HIMSELF, INVENTED BLACK ASSAILANT
    Robert Ralston A white police officer in Philadelphia was fired this week after confessing that he shot himself in the shoulder last month and blamed the shooting on a black assailant.

    According to Sgt. Robert Ralston's original story, he stopped two men on the railroad tracks late on the night of April 5. When one of them pulled a gun and put it to his head, he knocked it away, but it went off and grazed him in the shoulder. The attacker, whom Ralston described as having cornrows and a tattoo under his left eye, then ran off. The police immediately launched a massive manhunt, blanketing the predominantly African-American neighborhood with SWAT teams and K-9 units. "I think it's despicable," one resident complained.

    "The cops were stopping every man with dreadlocks. Every black man was harassed." "To us in Boston," noted the Boston Globe's James Alan Fox, "the incident is reminiscent of the Charles Stuart debacle when the police compromised the civil rights of the entire Mission Hill community in searching for the black assailant whom Stuart, a white suburbanite, claimed had shot him and his pregnant wife as they drove home from birthing class at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The aggressive and highly questionable manner in which the cops rousted countless numbers of residents of the area set race relations in the city back years upon years."

    Although no motivation has been established for the 21-year veteran's deception, Fox suggests that "Ralston was angry over having been transferred from a white community in South Philadelphia to the black neighborhood in West Philly." "I can't believe he'd really do something like that," Ralston's next door neighbor Brawly Joseph, who is black, told CNN. "That's really uncalled for. Ever since I've been living here, he's really been like anti-social around this area." According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Ralston's story quickly fell apart because "the facts of the case didn't add up. There was powder residue on his shirt that matched his own service weapon, indicating he was shot at close range. His reaction to the shooting also drew suspicion, and police said he seemed eager to cast himself in the role of a hero."

    "It's troubling in a lot of ways," Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey stated in announcing Ralston's confession. "It inflames racial tensions in our community, and that's certainly something we don't need." The Inquirer reports that Ralston "will face no criminal charges in the case, because he was offered immunity in exchange for his confession." He may also be able to collect his police pension. His badge number will be retired permanently, however, and he will "have to pay the cost of the massive manhunt that was sparked by his tale on April 5. ... [when] police spent hours combing the West Philadelphia neighborhood for possible suspects,"

  • SOURCE
  • COP BATONED AND PEPPER SPRAYED DISABLED MAN SAYS FELLOW COP
    alan heap A POLICE officer slapped a drunk disabled man, hit him with his baton and then fired CS spray in his face, a court heard yesterday. PC Alan Heap's alleged victim, Ewan MacWilliam, 26, was so intoxicated he could not stand, according to the officer's colleague, Constable Susan Walker. She described how Heap, 41, "lost his temper" and attacked Mr MacWilliam, who was handcuffed, because he refused to get into a police van.

    PC Walker told Inverness Sheriff Court: "I was not happy about what had happened. I was upset. I did not think he (MacWilliam] should have been batoned, sprayed and slapped." Heap, 41, faces a charge of assaulting Mr MacWilliam at Keppoch Road in Culloden, Inverness, on 28 February last year. The constable, who denies the charge, faces losing his job if convicted. PC Walker, 30, said she and colleague Blair Lawrie spotted MacWilliam slumped at a bus stop at around 9pm on the Saturday evening.

    The court heard Mr MacWilliam, who suffers severe learning difficulties, had been watching a Rangers football match earlier in the day and had been drinking heavily. PC Walker said they were concerned for his welfare and called on Heap to collect Mr MacWilliam and take him to a drying-out centre. She and PC Heap tried carrying him to the police van, but Ms Walker said: "He was intoxicated. "He was unstable on his feet and I lost my grip. He fell to the ground, face down. After a slight struggle he was handcuffed."

    The PC said Mr MacWilliam refused to get into the van, although he eventually sat on the edge of the vehicle. She added: "He was sitting on the edge, still not going in. That is when Heap pushed MacWilliam and slapped him to his face. "It was not a gentle slap. Tempers were getting flared. PC Heap was losing his temper. There was a lot of shouting at MacWilliam to get in his van. "MacWilliam swore. I think he said, 'don't f****** slap me'. He slapped him again. MacWilliam was starting to get quite upset."

    The PC described how they again attempted to get Mr MacWilliam further into the van, without success. She added: "He kicked out. That is when Heap took his baton out and struck MacWilliam to his legs. It was two or three times. Heap then took out his CS spray and sprayed MacWilliam's face." Eventually, they managed to get him into he van and Heap drove off.

    PC Walker made a statement the following morning and later spoke to Northern Constabulary's Professional Standard Unit. Mr MacWilliam later gave evidence and said he remembered drinking earlier in the day, watching a Rangers match, but could not recall the encounter with police. The trial continues.

  • SOURCE
  • Assault charge cop must wait for verdict
  • THE COST OF MASONIC THUG COPS IN A BRITISH POLICE STATE VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COST OF POLICE OVERTIME 'DOUBLES'
  • Masonic cops
  • FUNERAL OF MAN 'TORMENTED TO DEATH' BY YOBS
    david askew Britain's masonic cops no longer protect ordinary members of the public.

    The funeral of a 64-year-old man who neighbours say was "tormented to death" by yobs is to take place. David Askew, who had learning difficulties, collapsed and died in the garden of his home in Hattersley, Greater Manchester, on the evening of March 10. Police officers were called to his Melandra Crescent address after reports that youngsters were causing a disturbance outside.

    An initial post-mortem examination proved inconclusive but it is thought Mr Askew was not physically attacked during the incident. It emerged the authorities were previously warned he was targeted by gangs where he lived with his wheelchair-bound mother Rose and his brother Brian. One neighbour said Mr Askew was harassed for a decade and was "tormented to death", comparing his treatment to "bear-baiting".

    His mother's tribute said her son "wouldn't hurt a fly and he never saw bad in anyone. He always put others first". Greater Manchester Police referred the matter of previous contact with the family to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. The funeral takes place at St Barnabas' Church in Hattersley, followed by committal at Dukinfield Crematorium. An 18-year-old man has appeared in court charged with the harassment of Mr Askew between January 25 and March 10 this year, while another 18-year-old man arrested on suspicion of manslaughter remains on bail pending further inquiries.

  • SOURCE
  • FBI INVESTIGATE SEATTLE COP BEATING VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS 5
  • COPS 4
  • COPS 3
  • COPS 2
  • COPS 1