MASONIC COP MURDERS,VIOLENCE,INTIMIDATION AND PERSECUTION

COPS HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA
MASONIC COPS AGENDA

VULNERABLE MAN TORMENTED TO DEATH VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • DETAINED BY DUMMY COPS (PCSO)IN UK POLICE STATE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COP GETS 18 MONTHS FOR BEATING UP SUSPECT IN BACK OF SQUAD CAR VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • A former Milwaukee sheriff's deputy will spend 18 months behind bars for beating a man in the back of a squad car. The attack happened more than 4 months ago, after former deputy Scott Krause gave the handcuffed Ray Calderone a warning for kicking the window of the squad car. Calderone was asking to use the bathroom, and continued kicking the window. The tape then shows Krause yelling at Ca More..lderone and slapping and punching him in the head repeatedly. More than four months later, Calderone asked a judge to make an example out of his attacker.

    "I haven't been the same psychologically or physically," Calderone said in court on Friday. Prosecutors admit Calderone was unruly that night, but said that was no excuse for losing control. Krause's attorney says his client suffers from PTSD after four years in the army, and has zero history of violence.

    The former deputy tearfully apologized to his victim, his family, to the community and co-workers. "I'm also sorry to other law enforcement officers that may have gotten a bad name from what I did," Krause said. The judge recognized Krause's contrition and clean record, but sentenced him to a year and a half in prison, saying the shock from this abuse of power is too great to ignore. Calderone did not want to talk after court, but said through his attorney the sentence was fair.

    THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT TASERS

    A commuter in a diabetic coma, an 89-year-old man and children as young as 12 - just some of the targets of British police armed with skin-piercing 50,000-volt Taser guns. As the Home Office investigates bringing an even more powerful rifle version to Britain, Jason Benetto reports on the slow creep of arms onto our streets. The smartly dressed sales executive travelling on the number 96 bus across Leeds didn't notice his body descending into a state of severe hypoglycaemia. He didn't have time to ask his fellow passengers for help, or press the bell. Instead he slumped back in his seat in a diabetic coma, his head lolling from side to side. This was why he wore a special tag and chain around his neck: it advertised his diabetes. His mother and father, both retired GPs, had encouraged their son to wear it ever since he had started having to take insulin 20 years earlier.

    Nicholas Gaubert had been looking forward to a drink with friends in the suburb of Headingley after work. Instead he was critically ill, unconscious on the top deck of a bus continuing its route north through the early evening rush-hour traffic. Some 40 minutes later, it terminated at the Holt Park depot and the driver checked his vehicle. He was used to turfing drunks off the night bus at weekends, but it was Wednesday and the man apparently fast asleep on the top deck was far from dishevelled. On another evening, the driver may have reacted differently, but the timing tonight was bad for Gaubert: just six days after the July 7, 2005 London bombings and one week before the fatal shooting of the Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes by police firearms officers. Paranoia and suspicion, especially on public transport, were rife. And Gaubert had a rucksack. So the driver kept his distance and shouted at him to wake up and leave. When Gaubert failed to stir, the driver climbed off the bus and told his superiors, who cleared the depot and called the police.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • COP GETS INSTANT JUSTICE FOR SLAPPING YOUNG GIRL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COP CHIEF ARRESTED FOR TORCHING CAR TO COVER UP AFFAIR WITH BARRISTER'S WIFE

    jim trotman NO WONDER THE COPS ARE ALWAYS TO BUSY TO ASSIST THE LONG SUFFERING PUBLIC.

    A police chief who allegedly set fire to a car to destroy evidence of his affair with a barrister’s wife has been arrested. Chief Superintendent Jim Trotman had been using the police hire vehicle to visit his mistress and wanted to hide the fact he illegally clocked up mileage for personal use, sources said. After the car was destroyed by the flames, Mr Trotman claimed he was the victim of an arson attack and even named the barrister as a possible suspect, they added.

    The married father-of-two has also been suspended from Thames Valley Police while detectives investigate allegations of arson, insurance fraud and perverting the course of justice. A source said: ‘Officers who do a lot of travelling on behalf of the force are not allowed to use their private cars but have one hired for them by Thames Valley Police. ‘Mr Trotman used a hired car a lot and apparently found it useful because he could take his woman friend around with him without his own car being spotted and recognised by colleagues out on patrol. ‘Apparently he is in bother with the force because when you take out a hire car you have to sign a document saying you will not use it for any private mileage. 'But Mr Trotman was, by all accounts, using the car to go out with his lady friend.’

    Of the fire, the source added: ‘He named a man who was a barrister and who was apparently embroiled in the aftermath of a marriage split.’ However, detectives investigating his claim handed over the investigation to the force’s Professional Standards Department. It is understood that their inquiries centred on an insurance claim made by the police chief in relation to the hire car. Mr Trotman, an ex-Royal Marine, was arrested in front of colleagues last month while on duty at the force’s headquarters in Kidlington, Oxfordshire.

    He was taken to a Hampshire police station for DNA tests and interviewed under caution. He has been suspended from duty on full pay and bailed pending further enquiries until April 8. On Thursday night, neighbours said Mr Trotman had recently moved out of the £370,000 detached house he shared with his wife Charlotte and their two children, one of whom is severely autistic, in Wallingford, Oxfordshire. He has since moved into a £450,000 townhouse in the nearby town of Abingdon overlooking the marina.

    Mr Trotman, who is also an assistant Cub Scout leader, has been head of strategic development at Thames Valley Police since 2007. Before his promotion he was a police commander for Oxford for two years. During his tenure he was credited with helping reduce crime and overseeing the introduction of neighbourhood policing. The police chief joined the police force in 1992, and was made area commander for West Berkshire. He served in the Royal Marines in the First Gulf War in Iraq between 1990 and 1991 and also in Northern Ireland. He was not available for comment last night.

    A Thames Valley Police spokesman confirmed that ‘a senior police officer’ had been arrested, suspended from duty and bailed pending further inquiries. He said: ‘The arrest was made by officers from the force’s Professional Standards Department after an investigation.’

  • SOURCE
  • $95,000 LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AFTER DEPUTY TASERS HANDCUFFED SUSPECT IN CELL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • A 48-year-old North Naples man Tasered while handcuffed in a jail cell after an unlawful arrest in 2005 settled his federal lawsuit against Collier County Sheriff Kevin Rambosk and four deputies for $95,000.

    The settlement came a day after the agency’s attorney agreed to a $50,000 settlement in another Taser case involving a teen who died, which deputies blamed on a drug overdose. U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson signed an order Tuesday, dropping the lawsuit against Rambosk, corporals Dennis Sheridan and Scott Freiburger, Deputy Autumn Brown and Sgt. John Dennison, who was fired and sentenced to probation after he Tasered Robert Franklin Browne in 2005. Browne denied being combative, only being angry and cursing at Sheridan, Freiburger and Brown for coming into his home on Oct. 5, 2005, after he admitted he’d sideswiped a car and left the scene because he had no cell phone and couldn’t find the driver, who left. When deputies knocked at the door of Browne’s home on 97th Avenue North, he was upset, his lawsuit says, and deputies came inside, handcuffed him and pulled him outside.

    At the patrol car, the lawsuit says, Freiburger Tasered him between the shoulders, causing him to soil his pants, then placed him in the car despite Browne’s pleas to get clean clothing. After he was booked into the jail, the lawsuit says, Dennison entered the holding cell and Tasered him in the chest as Browne stood at the rear of the cell, his hands cuffed behind his back — clearly not attempting to resist. He collapsed to the floor, unconscious, as a video camera taped the entire incident.

    As a result of the excessive force, the lawsuit says, he suffered broken ribs and a cut to his face. When he shouted for medical attention, deputies came into the cell and strapped him to a restraining chair, causing additional pain and suffering. The next day, when he was scheduled for an appearance before a judge, deputies told him they’d lost his paperwork and he’d have to wait another day. Sheriff’s reports say Browne was Tasered after he resisted arrest and became combative.

    “They said I was out of control,” Browne said. “I wasn’t out of control. I was calling them everything in the books, but I wasn’t violent.” “I said it was unlawful search and seizure,” Browne said he told deputies who wanted to search his truck, prompting Freiburger to Taser him outside his house. “... After Dennison Tasered me, he kneed me in my back and stood on my back. You can see it on the video.” Browne had repeatedly refused to accept any plea deals, including a year in prison, contending the video would support his account. In court, criminal attorney David Agoston demanded the jail cell video, which the sheriff’s office had denied existed. Once Agoston obtained it, the State Attorney’s Office dropped the charges.

    The order dropping the lawsuit was signed after attorney Bruce Jolly of Fort Lauderdale, who represented the sheriff and deputies, and Browne’s attorney, Patrick Geraghty of Fort Myers, signed a stipulation to dismiss the case Tuesday after negotiating a settlement. “Internal affairs said ... what he did was wrong and fired him,” Geraghty said of Dennison. “We’re hoping that this case gets the department to look at its use of Taser policy.” Geraghty said the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and U.S. Department of Justice say there’s no need to Taser someone who is handcuffed. After suing the sheriff’s office, he said, he received 37,000 pages of use of force reports; several involving handcuffed inmates were being used in this case.

    Jolly couldn’t be reached for comment.

    Browne, a construction worker, said he lost time from work due to the injuries, hiring an attorney for his criminal case and a lawsuit, which charged the sheriff and deputies with using excessive force, violating his constitutional rights, unlawful imprisonment, and causing emotional distress. It also accused then Sheriff Donald Hunter of having a policy of excessive force involving Tasers and failing to train deputies in the use of force. In June 2008, a judge granted motions by Sheridan and Freiburger to dismiss counts accusing them of false imprisonment and causing emotional distress, and counts accusing Hunter of assault and battery and failing to properly train deputies in the use of force. Browne admitted he had a felony drug conviction from when he was in his 20s, but has never been violent and only cursed and yelled that day.

    “I lost $400,000 and had to refinance my house,” Browne said. “I had five broken ribs and a dislocated finger and a concussion. ... The video exonerated me.” He was out of work for 10 weeks at a time when he was making $56,000 a year and when he returned, Browne said, he suffered vertigo and fell off a ladder, cracking his ribs again. He accepted a settlement because his wife “couldn’t take it anymore” after nearly two years in court. Michelle Batten, a spokeswoman for Rambosk, said the lawsuit involved a former sergeant’s conduct, “which was clearly inappropriate and was inconsistent with CCSO policy.”

    “The agency’s policies and procedures are sound and comply with existing law,” Batten said, noting that the sheriff’s Professional Responsibility Bureau investigated and discharged Dennison. “Sheriff Rambosk takes the investigations of complaints against agency members seriously and has procedures in place to address situations where a member violates established policies and procedures,” she added. “In addition, CCSO has established a civil review panel made up of community members to review use of force complaints, which provides our community with another layer of oversight.”

    Dennison was fired on Aug. 9, 2006, after a nearly six-year career. On Feb. 5, 2007, Dennison, then 32, pleaded no contest to battery, a misdemeanor, and was sentenced to six months of supervised probation, with a condition he complete an anger management course.

    FORMER CHIEF CONSTABLE IAN BLAIR ATTACKED ON DE MENEZES MURDER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS DRAG ELDERLY MAN THROUGH UNOPENED DOOR VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • POLICE STATE UK STYLE(POOR SOUND QUALITY) VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • UK'S MASONIC COPS ARE INCOMPETENT LAZY OVERPAID THUGS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • PUSHING TERRORISM BUTTON A GREAT MONEY SPINNER FOR UK'S CORRUPT MASONIC COPS

    TERRORISM PART OF THE MASONIC RUSE

    ACPO comes under new fire as £1.6m is used on 'perks' for officers

    Britain’s most powerful police body, which is run as a private business, has spent millions of pounds meant for counter-terrorism work on luxury London flats for senior officers. The spending on an undisclosed number of apartments in the Westminster area is understood to be about £1.6million a year. The money is taken directly from taxpayers’ cash given to the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) by the Home Office to tackle the terrorist threat across Britain. The funding – £33million last year – is supposed to be used to beef up regional police forces’ anti-terrorism response and pay for crucial equipment and facilities. Instead, ACPO’s Terrorism & Allied Matters (TAM) committee, headed by Assistant Commissioner John Yates, has used millions of pounds from the budget to pay for flats. Last night ACPO refused to disclose how many apartments it was paying for, or who was receiving the perk, but all are said to be well-appointed homes close to Scotland Yard. ACPO insists they are ‘occupied’, but two well-placed sources told The Mail on Sunday that officers only occasionally stay in them.

    Local estate agents say the cheapest two-bedroom flats in the area cost £400,000 to buy or at least £300 a week to rent. But with the officers requiring a ‘secure location’ the flats are said to cost substantially more. ACPO is already under fire for its commercial activities. Last year The Mail on Sunday disclosed it was:

    * Selling information from the Police National Computer for up to £70 - even though it pays just 60p to access the details.
    * Marketing ‘police approval’ logos to firms selling anti-theft devices.
    * Operating a separate private firm offering training to speed-camera operators, which is run by a senior officer who was banned from driving.

    The news led to questions about ACPO’s central role in policing, writing rules on police operations, as well as campaigning on key issues such as the proposed 90-day detention for terror suspects and the DNA database. ACPO president Sir Hugh Orde has pledged to reform the organisation, admitting its role as a private firm paid millions a year by the taxpayer to effectively run the nation’s police forces was uncomfortable. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, the police watchdog, went further, saying its ‘status as a private limited company cannot continue’.

    The new revelations are expected to increase the pressure for the reform or abolition of the organisation. ACPO’s terrorism committee budget is supposed to be separate from the organisation’s other activities. But the revelation it is spending anti-terrorist money on perks for senior officers now puts this part of its work under the spotlight.

    Last night Mr Yates, who headed the cash-for-honours inquiry in 2006, attempted to justify the need for the flats and said they would be sold should they no longer be required. ‘A massive amount of work was instigated post-9/11 to ensure that the UK had a national structure in place to tackle terrorism. This work required a vast amount of resources to ensure that a national counter-terrorism strategy was put in place.

    As a result, staff seconded to ACPO TAM were entitled to accommodation while working in London. This structure is now in place and as a result a review has been conducted of ACPO TAM, including the requirements for staff accommodation. ‘All the properties for seconded staff are occupied and leases would be relinquished at the earliest opportunity if a property became vacant.’ But privately Yates is understood to be horrified anti-terrorist cash has been used in this way.

    He has ordered an internal review to examine how the counter-terrorism money is being spent to ensure that ‘resources are used more cost effectively’ in future. Sources say the accommodation issue is a high priority and future secondees to the body will have to make alternative housing arrangements when they are required in London. One senior police source said: ‘The flats are all over Westminster, like an address book for the well-heeled. They are empty most of the time because there is no need to use them.

    ‘No politician will ever say this but the terrorism budget is over-stuffed. Every year they have a huge under-spend which they lavish on things that are not needed. These flats were bought out of this under-spend.’ Patrick Mercer, a former Tory Homeland Security spokesman, said: ‘Every penny allocated to counter-terrorism is precious. It therefore disappoints me taxpayers’ money is being used in this way.’

  • SOURCE
  • KILLER COP GETS LIFE FOR SHOOTING RAMPAGE IN MOSCOW SUPERMARKET VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS PLANT DRUGS ON SUSPECT AND LET DOG ATTACK VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS IN FLAP AS HOMOSEXUAL FLAGS FLY AT POLICE STATIONS

    A FLAG showing police support for the gay community has sparked a row.

    Some city-based officers have said they are unhappy at the appearance of the rainbow flag above Swansea Central Police Station, along with the base in Townhill. They said a Welsh flag would be more representative of the people working for South Wales Police and that even a force flag would be more appropriate. But a spokeswoman for South Wales Police defended the decision to fly the flag at some of its buildings and said it had done so to support Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender History month.

    The Rainbow Flag will also be flown at the Bridgend headquarters site, along with Neath police station. But a Swansea police officer said that even homosexuals working in the force were against the decision to fly the flag. He said: "There is not even a Welsh flag up but all police stations are being told they have to put up the gay flag. "I have seen it at Townhill Police Station and also at Swansea Central Police Station.

    "I have nothing against homosexuals but a lot of people have kicked off about it. "I spoke to my gay colleague as to how he feels about the flag and even he's opposed to it." He added: "There's no Welsh flag or South Wales Police flag — it's all about political correctness. There are more Welsh people working for South Wales Police than gays — why do they feel the need to have the flag up?"

    But South Wales Police communities and partnerships Superintendent Liane Bartlett added: "The flags are a sign of our commitment to supporting the rights of every individual and our commitment to supporting our LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender) communities. "Our force's aim is for the people of South Wales to live in an environment that is open and welcoming, and free from discrimination. The flags symbolise our pledge to our communities that we will tackle all crime, including any homophobic hate crime, and would encourage residents to report issues to us. "South Wales Police has specialist staff in its Minorities Support Unit to deal with this type of crime and has dedicated Hate Crime Police Officers in Cardiff, Swansea, Rhondda Cynon Taff and Merthyr Tydfil, Bridgend, Vale of Glamorgan and Neath and Port Talbot divisions who provide ongoing support to victims."

    She said if officers had any concerns they were more than welcome to raise them. "Alongside the Assembly and other Welsh forces we have worked in partnership with charity Safer Wales to develop and launch a confidential hate crime self-reporting initiative online at www.saferwales.com, where members of the public can report hate crime confidentially and anonymously," she added. "The flag is a symbol of inclusiveness. If officers or staff do have any concerns we would provide an opportunity to air views in relation to the subject as part of the force's commitment to diversity and equal opportunities."

  • SOURCE
  • Grandmother who objected to homosexual march is accused of hate crime
  • TRANS-GENDER COP ROADSHOW SPREADING THE WORD AT GAY FESTIVAL
  • Freemasonry's Connection To The Homosexual Movement
  • Former cop jailed over boy abuse
  • IOWA COP THUGS JOHN SICKELS AND JAMES CHRISTENSEN RAPE TRIAL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • DISBELIEF OVER CALIFORNIA COP CHRIS BOWERSOX INDECENT IMAGES CHARGE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • OKLAHOMA COP ACCUSED OF RAPING GIRL HE WAS SUPPOSED TO PROTECT VIDEO

  • LOUIS ALVIE MORRIS FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MICHIGAN SHERIFF'S DEPUTY SCOTT FORD FACING SEX CHARGES VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • BOISE COPS TASER MAN ON BUTTOCKS AND THREATEN TO RAPE HIM WITH TASER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • EX-FLORIDA SHERIFF CLARENCE SHEPARD SENTENCED ON MOLESTATION CHARGES VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FORMER LOS ANGELES COP BILLY RAY WHITE SENTENCED FOR ALLEGED RAPE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • EX-FLORIDA COP BEGINS TRIAL OVER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • TUNNEL BEATING VICTIM SAYS SEATTLE COPS WOULDN'T HELP HER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • NEW YORK COP ADMITS SEXUAL ABUSE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • I TOOK ON BULLY COP... NOW I LIVE IN FEAR

    ali dizaei THEY ARE ALL LIKE THIS EXCEPT THIS ONE WAS BROUGHT DOWN BECAUSE HE WAS HEAD OF THE BLACK COP ASSOCIATION.

    Man that UK's most corrupt police chief Ali Dizaei tried to frame tells his story .
    THE brave informant who finally toppled Britain's most corrupt cop today tells his own incredible story of monster Ali Dizaei's chilling mafia-style regime. Humble website designer Waad Al Bagdhdadi, 24, refused to be bullied by the bent Scotland Yard commander. Now, with Dizaei jailed for four years, he reveals astonishing details of the shamed officer's life of luxury funded by his grip on a terrified community. "Ali Dizaei was like the Godfather of the Iranian Community," said Waad. "They used to call him The Boss.

    "He set up 'office' in the middle of a restaurant where he'd carry out business meetings with his dodgy friends. "He ate for free, he drank for free. In his world, he didn't pay for anything. But I wasn't going to let him get me for free." The two men fell out after Waad - who fled Iraq at 17 to escape the tyranny of Saddam Hussein - asked for payment for setting up Dizaei's personal website. Instead of coughing up the swaggering cop tried to frame Waad for attacking him. Innocent Waad was infuriated, pursued a complaint and finally brought the monster down. But, even with his enemy behind bars, Waad sees himself a marked man.

    "I did what I had to do but I too have lost my freedom," he said. "I'm always looking over my shoulder. When I left Iraq I had no idea I was going from one dictator to fall into the hands of another. "I'd heard about Dizaei before I met him. He was famous in the Middle Eastern community. They called him London's top officer. They said he was f***ing the English, the only one they couldn't take down, 'untouchable'. "He was acting like the movie gangster Tony Montana in Scarface.

    "The first time I saw him was in a restaurant. It was like a celebrity had walked in. People were pushing past each other, trying to speak to him and shake his hand. It was lunchtime and he was wearing his police uniform. "He was cheap, arrogant and brash - talking loudly on his phone so everyone could hear him. He wanted people to know he was important. "He always had the best table, right in the middle where he could meet and greet everyone. If a person had problems with immigration he'd help fill out passport applications. He'd have a lawyer there and they'd openly hold these dodgy meetings like gangsters." Waad watched as Dizaei was lavished with freebies, defying the laws he was paid to uphold. "He used to drink whisky," said Waad. "On several occasions I saw him drink then brazenly get in his car and drive off. He surrounded himself with important people and beautiful girls. He was just a crook in uniform.

    "And he loved the belly dancers. He never paid for his meals but he used to tuck £50 notes into the girls' underwear. He wanted everyone to see him flashing his money." Waad and Dizaei first got to know each other 2½ years ago when the cocky cop wanted a personal website to publicise himself. As he wolfed down a kebab he outlined his requirements to a stunned Waad, who recalled: "Dizaei showed me pictures he wanted to use. They were professionally taken of him posing in his uniform, looking at the camera over his shoulder. I asked him, 'Do you think you're a celebrity or what?' "I found it very odd. I said, 'Listen you're not David Beckham, you know.' I was sort of joking but trying to tell him these poses didn't look right for a police officer. He then showed me pictures of his wife Shy he wanted on the site. I couldn't believe it. She was in a sexy pose, dressed like a schoolgirl, her blouse open and cleavage on show, wearing a policeman's hat. It was totally inappropriate and I told him. He finally agreed on a more modest picture." Waad spent more than 100 hours building the site. But when he asked for his £600 fee in July, 2008, trouble started. Dizaei was used to making demands, not receiving them. After the failed attempt to frame Waad - including 23 hours in custody - the young whistleblower faced extraordinary intimidation in the run-up to Dizaei's trial for perverting justice and misconduct in public office.

    He told us: "About a month after I made the complaint I was asked by someone connected to Dizaei if money could 'change my mind'. "I got another visit from one leading member of the community who told me there were people who wanted me dead. He advised me to leave the country. Another offered me £250,000 to manage a restaurant. Then beautiful women started to visit my coffee shop. They'd come on to me and try to seduce me. They were gorgeous girls who simply wouldn't normally be interested in an ordinary guy like me. I suspected they were prostitutes. "They were offering me sex and telling me we could do cocaine. I thought they were trying to lure me into some seedy drugs den where they'd take pictures of me to bring me down. "It became obvious they were trying to set me up. I had to keep my control and resist these women. "I was also being followed. Cars with Middle Eastern men would trail me from work and wait outside my house." On one occasion, the home of Waad's girlfriend was ransacked but nothing taken.

    Waad suspects it was a warning, for daring to threaten destruction of Dizaei's rotten empire. An empire built on wielding three weapons - fear, the race card and a uniform. For years Dizaei's bosses were convinced he was corrupt but had failed to nail him, as he used the race issue to dodge exposure - although Waad insisted: "Dizaei was the racist. The way he spoke about white people was totally racist. He looked down on them." During Operation Helios, the ill-fated probe into Dizaei's life and integrity, surveillance officers tailed him to dozens of meetings. Police also gathered statements from people who claimed they had paid Dizaei money for advice on their claims to stay in Britain. And he was caught associating with a conman and four major criminals.

    But, despite the evidence, Dizaei not only survived he got an apology AND promotion. In the end it took the courage - and two-year ordeal - of Waad to bring him to book. Last night he said: "I was just the little man, not the big police officer, but I told the truth. I never lied and justice was done."

  • SOURCE
  • BIRMINGHAM AMERICA THUG COPS BEAT UP UNCONSCIOUS MAN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • CALIFORNIAN COP GETS SIX MONTHS FOR SEX CRIMES VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS ARREST 84 YR OLD PENSIONER AFTER CONTINUOUS HARASSMENT FROM YOBS

    graham powell

    AS EVER THE BRITISH MASONIC COP MAFIA ENSURE THEY CONVICT THE INNOCENT WHILE PROTECTING CRIMINALS.

    THE former leader of Gwent county council said yesterday he had been arrested after allegedly striking a teenage boy with his walking-stick. Graham Powell, 84, who was involved in local politics for 58 years, said he was arrested on December 22 by police after the alleged incident at his home in Sandy Lane, Caldicot. He has since been released on police bail until February 17 while officers make further inquiries, but Mr Powell, who was leader of Gwent county council between 1981 and 1991, told the Argus yesterday he had not done anything wrong.

    Gwent Police said yesterday they could not confirm if Mr Powell had been arrested. Mr Powell, who also led Monmouthshire council between 1991 and 1994, says he was arrested following an incident on December 21 when it is alleged the veteran politician struck a teenage boy on the arm with his walking-stick after trying to intervene in an incident between his wife Sybil, 74, and the teenager. The boy is later thought to have been taken to hospital to be treated for injuries to his arm. Mr Powell said he was arrested and questioned by police the following day.

    He has not yet been charged with any offence, but said he would deny any charges which may be brought. The Argus reported in November last year that the couple were considering leaving the ground-floor flat where they have lived for the last 31 years because of what they said was a catalogue of anti-social behaviour. Mr Powell claims that over the last four months a group of around six youths between the ages of 11 and 15 have subjected him and his wife to weekly verbal abuse, smashing the rear headlights of his car, smearing the vehicle with tomato ketchup and flour, and throwing eggs at their back door.

    In one of the incidents, he claims youths locked his wife inside their garage as she put away her car. The garage door could not be opened from the inside, and Mr Powell says he had to free his wife after he heard her shouts.

    Two days later, youths also shut Mrs Powell inside an outdoor bin shed, he claims. Mr Powell, who retired from local politics in 2004, said: “I have lived here for 31 years and I have never had any treatment like this. We try to treat other people in a proper manner. My wife and I are both anxious that it has got to stop.”

  • SOURCE
  • AUSTRALIAN GOLD COAST COP CORRUPTION VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • JUDGE SEALS VIDEO EVIDENCE OF COP MURDER BY TASER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • CORRUPT UK AND HOW MASON COPS PROTECT THEIR CRIMINAL BROTHERS

    Her Majesties judicial mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties legal mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Chief Constable mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties bailiff mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties tax mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties political mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties council mafia's are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties DWP mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties social services mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties court mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties prison mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Crown Office mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Government mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Inspectorate are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Customs and Excise are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Knights are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Treasury are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Justices of the Peace are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Lords are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Privy Council are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties High Commission are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Royal Authority are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Secret Service are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Mint are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Opposition are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Special Services are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Commissioners are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Inspectorate of Constabularies are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties Inspectorate of Education are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties TV producer mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Her Majesties newspaper mafia are getting away with MURDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Because every arm of the system that keeps them in power is as corrupt as the whole. Masons have been deliberately infiltrated into the police to such a degree that it is now the MAIN arm of the masons who are dominating wealth and power in the UK with the blessing of the British Royal family as patrons and who head this evil system of control . They remain only in that privileged position because all key positions of power are held by masonic lackeys.

    For anyone who has yet to experience Crown persecution they will, in time, be dragged into the most corrupt part of this system, the civil courts across the UK, that are thieving victims livelihoods in the biggest transfer of wealth Britain has ever seen. The UK's masonic cops have been party to the VAST theft of properties aiding and abetting bailiffs who with dodgy warrants signed by corrupt masonic judges steal land and property on a GRAND SCALE. A small self appointed legal mafia responsible for more crimes than ALL other crimes put together. Any small time criminal may be able to steal your TV or video but only the crooks that work for the crown can remove you from your home in the most evil system of law and order across the globe and makes Mugabe's land theft pale by comparison.

    They then share the spoils of that theft from the top down starting with the British royal family who hand pick the judicial mobsters that do their bidding and ensure the Crown and its myriad of masonic hangers on live off the spoils of their victims hard earned assets like vultures stripping the last piece of meat from a carcass. When you read the British newspapers and watch British TV the facade they create ensures this vast transfer of wealth into the masonic/ royalist coffers goes on unreported but for their victims who now, thanks to the internet, have a platform to inform the unsuspecting public of their own demise should they find themselves in the same hallowed walls of the civil courts where Hitlers spirit is alive and well . At least when the Gestapo were carrying out their reign of terror across the globe we got reports about it , but the complicit media have been assisting the censorship of this sinister and creepy network of masonic theft by its lackeys and remains undetected due to the smokescreen of respectability they have built up using their corporate media buddies who are all part of the same satanic network of control.

    Victims who stand up to this mob of gangsters face endless persecution from the masonic mafia who will do anything to ensure they remove every last piece of value from you, once you become a target, and that can happen by simply breaking up with your spouse or partner and then the whole system kicks in big time to ensure you will be left homeless , penniless and childless thanks to the utter greed of thugs who have been getting away with murder for far to long.

    A GROWING BODY OF VICTIMS WILL ENSURE THAT SYSTEMS DEMISE THAT WE HAVE NEVER HAD ANY DOUBTS ABOUT.

  • More than 10,000 Britons declared bankrupt every month
  • MORE CROWN SCAMS HERE
  • MORE JUDICIAL SCAMS HERE
  • MORE POLITICAL SCAMS HERE
  • MORE LAWYER SCAMS HERE
  • MORE MASONIC SCAMS HERE
  • COP FIRED FOR BRUTALITY IS RE-HIRED BY ANOTHER POLICE FORCE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • CAUGHT ON TAPE WINNIPEG COPS BEAT UP SUSPECT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • TRAFALGAR SQUARE PROTEST AGAINST COP INTIMIDATION OF PHOTOGRAPHERS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS SOLD GUNS HANDED IN BY THE PUBLIC

    durham cops Two policemen have admitted their involvement in the selling of guns handed in to police by the public to be destroyed.

    PC Maurice Allen, 47, and PC Damien Cobain, 42, pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office, during a brief hearing at Newcastle Crown Court. Both are firearms licensing officers with Durham Police and were arrested during an investigation launched in February last year. It followed information which came to light during inquiries into a burglary at a farmhouse in north Durham.

    One of the items stolen in the raid was a rifle, which the owner said he had bought from the police. The seven month investigation, supervised by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, examined claims that weapons handed in by the public for safe disposal were then sold on.

    PC Allen, from Houghton-le-Spring, Wearside, who has nearly 29 years’ service, also faces 16 charges of theft relating to various firearms and no pleas were entered. He and PC Cobain, who has eight years’ service, were granted unconditional bail to appear at the same court on Feb 26. Police have said that all the firerarms had been accounted for and there was nothing to suggest that any of the weapons had been used in criminal activity.

  • SOURCE
  • DAZER LASER SWAT TEAM DEMO VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • The Dazer Laser comes in two handheld models, the Defender and the Guardian, which can be mounted on a rifle or a shotgun, the company said. The Defender emits an eye-safe green beam with a diameter of 0.2 m to 2.5 m (about 1 to 8 ft) into what the company calls the Dazer Zone, the range of which can adjust from as close as 1 m to the target to up to 2400 m away, or nearly a mile and a half.

    The beam, when shined in the face of a perceived aggressor, temporarily blinds him, impairs his balance and induces motion sickness that lasts for several hours, making it difficult to move, according to company publications. It can control people even when their eyes are closed. The Guardian operates with a smaller-diameter beam and a shorter range of up to 100 m, or about 328 ft. Potential applications for the lasers include homeland security, prison security and crowd control in riots, the company said. Both models can operate also in nondaze mode as searchlights.

    ON THE JOB ON THE SQUARE

    mason cop In the courtroom of honor, the judge pounded his gavel To show that all's equal and that the courts are on the level - Bob Dylan

    It seems to me much of the speculation concerning the Stockwell atrocity still plays a version of Blame the Victim: What did Jean Charles de Menezes know that made him a target? Who did he know? If he wasn't a terrorist, what else was he that would provoke plainclothed Special Forces to restrain him and pump seven bullets in the back of his head? Sometimes - often - it's in that direction the truth lies. (Poor Nick Berg, for instance, didn't simply get unlucky.) But I don't think so this time. This wasn't a hit to take out a Brazilian contract engineer. If it were, I imagine it would have been done either much more quietly, or with the foresight to plant damning evidence in his flat. The very bloody and public murder seems a demonstration, but of what, and to whom? If there were a motive - if it wasn't just a bizarre sequence of tragic events (and anyone who's lived long enough should concede that such things happen, too) - then it has nothing to do with the unfortunate de Menezes. It must reside elsewhere, in a place that may seem to us like madness.

    This is a British story, and Britain is a land that hasn't forgotten how weird it is. Drive a modern highway in southern England for any distance and you'll pass standing stones, ancient mounds, chalk figures and crop circles. More so than in the so-called "New World," secularism seems like a thin and flaking coat of paint slopped on some very old and strange things. This extends to crime stories, as elements of the occult often arise on British police blotters, but they just as often fade away, without resolution. I think of The Guardian headline from last June, Children trafficked into Britain for sacrifice rituals; a BBC story from January, 2005: Dead sheep found in "occult star" ("the sheep were found on Sampford Spiney on Dartmoor with their necks broken and their bodies in a pattern sometimes associated with the occult"); and from last July: Occult link to drowned councillor. ("Detectives investigating the death of a Cornish parish councillor have confirmed they are looking at possible links with the occult. They believe 56-year-old Peter Solheim, from Carnkie, was interested in black magic.") In 1996, a young environmentalist named Nicholas Gargari plunged screaming to his death from a cliff in the East Sussex town of Lewes. The walls of his home were found papered with torn Bible pages, and scrawled upon them was the message "God help me I have been cursed." (Though reputedly not in Gargari's hand.) Detectives learned from his friends that, shortly before his death, he had received a "cow's heart pierced with nails and a fetish entwined with a lock of human hair." Suspicion fell upon Gargari's unlikely friendship with a Satanic fascist named Alex Smith, who "attended the inquest and sat grinning at the bereaved sister and mother, displaying his inverted cross tattoos,and protected by a burly looking body guard." Under cross examination regarding his Far Right ties, Smith became verbally abusive, and needed to be physically ejected from the courtroom. Gargari's death could not be ruled either a murder or a suicide, and the Coroner recorded an open verdict.

    In the same town of Lewes, six years earlier, a local scandal of sorts broke when it was revealed that a Satanist named Rosemary Barratt worked as a secretary inside Lewes Police Intelligence Unit. Barratt "had long fostered a deep interest in severe sado-masochistic sex, having relations with literally dozens of magical masters," seeking painful degradation while possessed by a spirit named "Absolon." Local Wiccan sources alleged that two police officers were members of a dangerous Satanic group conducting rituals atop limestone cliffs. The Chief Constable for Sussex, Paul Whitehouse, "refused to state whether he personally knew of Satanists inside his force, though he "did point out that it was not an offence to be a member of this type of organisation." But before we go too far down that road, we should take a step back and examine another legal occult organization, because it's hard to talk seriously about the British police force without talking about Freemasonry. Unfortunately, for many people, it's hard to talk seriously about Freemasonry at all. In his Inside the Brotherhood, Martin Short details the story of Chief Inspector Brian Woollard, whose distinguished career included 14-years with Special Branch attached to the Bomb Squad, royal protection, and armed personal detective to Home Secretary Roy Jenkins. Woollard's career effectively ended when he was posted to London's Fraud Squad. As Short writes, "it was there that he first sensed the power which Freemasonry seems to have over law enforcement in London."

    Assigned to commercial fraud, Woollard was assigned a sensitive inquiry which involved tape recorded conversations describing police officers do favours for fellow Freemasons. Handing Woollard the case, his supervisor, whom Short calls "Grimm," said "I don't know which lodge you're in." When Woollard replied he belonged to no lodge, Grimm appeared surprised, and told him to complete the task in a week. The recordings showed evidence of blackmail, and Woollard sent the tapes off for forensic testing. Grimm was apoplectic that the names of "innocent policeman" might be produced in court, and subjected Woollard to the tightest scrutiny of his career. Soon there was so much distrust the two officers could no longer work together, and Woollard moved to another section of the Fraud Branch. (Months later, he heard the case he left in Grimm's hands was closed with a decision of "no further action.") He was handed a case of public sector corruption involving inflated payments to building contractors, and soon found his work obstructed by police officers in his own department who belonged to the same lodge as subjects of his investigation in the building works department. Woollard persisted until he was moved right out of the Fraud Branch, and was replaced on the corruption case by a Freemason. He was ordered by a Masonic supervisor to have a psychiatric evaluation regarding his delusion at seeing Masons everywhere. He was demoted to uniform, even though he hadn't had one for 20 years, and assigned to a station where all five officers above him in the chain of command were Freemasons. When some newspapers picked up the story of his humiliation by the Masonic fraternity, Woollard found his case files disappearing from a locked administrative room overnight. One long-serving, sympathetic constable reported that "everyone knew the theft was part of a Masonic plot to discredit Woollard."

    Masonic plot. There are two words to get you laughed right out of the respectable Left, Right or Middle. But as it often goes with things many people find hilarious, when you peel away the ridiculous crust, there's not a great deal to laugh about. In The Arcana of Freemasonry, Albert Churchward writes that "Freemasonry in all its degrees, from the first to the thirty-third, is the old Eschatology of the Egyptians - or the doctrine of final things": The casual brother does not trouble his head about these things; the majority look upon Freemasonry merely as a sort of Brotherhood for social intercourse and charity. Up to a certain point these views are correct.... But there is a higher view. Freemasonry means much more than this. In Freemasonry we have many mysteries, handed down to us from remote ages.... This knowledge can be obtained only in one way, and that is by mastering the old writings of the Egyptians and the glyphs of the Stellar Mythos people...because by that, and that alone, can the origin and meaning of all that is attached to the term "Brotherhood of Freemasonry" be found.

    The corruption and compromises Brian Woollard discovered could be said to be those of the "casual brothers." Petty crimes, unconcerned with Set and Horus and the doctrine of final things. But speculative Freemasonry is the core of the Craft, and its infusion of all layers of British authority presents opportunities for a different order of criminal behaviour. In its investigation of David Myatt and the occult-fascist axis, the magazine Searchlight quotes a bulletin from Combat 18 which attempts to disavoy the encroachment of Satanists upon British neo-Nazism. "The Fuhrer would turn over in his grave," it reads. "Satanists are dirty scum who use this bullshit as a front for child molestation." The bulletin also called for the boycott of another Satanic fascist and Myatt associate, Stephen Cox, "alleging that he peddles illegal child porn movies."

    Searchlight continues:

    Cox, a close political ally of Myatt, runs the fraternity of Balder, another Satanist group, formed in 1990. Like the Order of Nine Angles, the Fraternity of Balder is dedicated to Aryan living and offers physical and mental training alongside an extensive political and Satanist library. During the 1980s Myatt lived alongside Myatt in Church Sutton and worked as a teacher. Balder, which emphasizes male-bonding rituals, is the public face of Cox's Satanism. A more secret and sinister organisation is the Fraternitas Loki.... According to its own propaganda: the new order succeeding Ragnarok will not arrive without intervention of the Dark Twin: the ambivalent, bisexual, resourceful, daring and handsome Loki." Its literature reveals the underground nature of its activities. "Unlike other matters in Balder the Fraternitas Loki is quite covert as was the case with the original Black Order of the closing years of WW2 and the esoteric war of post 1945 - a subterranean reality and unknown to all but a few.

    Cox's portal to his more respectable front, the Arktion Federation, can be found here. The home page contains the "Important Notice" that, "although our work is concerned solely with European spirituality and heritage," Arktion is neither political nor racist. "If you read or hear of anything by an individual or group contradicting these facts please do not worry: it is merely an infantile and malicious lie by sad and sick minds. We pray they may recover from their illness and see the light of truth and human fellowship." A link to the Fraternity of Balder - called the "Jarls of Baelder" - and information pertainting to the Fraternitas Loki is on the top menu. Most interesting is Cox's lengthy biography. Along with "teacher," "author" and "philosopher," is listed "Freemason." And quite an accomplished Freemason he is:

    On the Summer Solstice of 1991 he was initiated into British Freemasonry in his Mother Lodge within the Masonic Province of Berkshire in the United Grand Lodge of England. Since then he has worked his way through the various officerships of the lodge to rise to have the honour to become the Worshipful Master of his Lodge in 1999-2000 (which is always a one year appointment in any lodge). In year 2000-2001 he served his Lodge as the Immediate Past Master. And then in 2001-2002, and again in 2002-2003 and for the 3rd., year 2003-2004 was appointed its Assistant Director of Ceremomies (a monthly duty), and its Preceptor of the Class of Instruction (a twice monthly duty). He has written and delivered to the Class a number of unique lecture papers on the symbolism, mysteries, history and spiritual philosophy of different aspects of the three degrees of Craft Masonry with regards to the Emulation Ritual. He has also written a book of guidance for Stewards and newly raised Master Masons. He offers private tuition and meetings for officers of the Lodge to assist them in their progress and for newly made Masons and Stewards. Free tours of the Berskhire Masonic Centre and its lodge rooms and temple, with an introduction to Freemasonry, its history and symbolism are given by him to his students and friends from around Europe. In October 2003 he was elected by the Lodge members to be Master Elect to serve as Worshipful Master of his lodge for a 2nd. time (for the year 2004-2005).

    This suggests the hypothetical situation of a Masonic policeman being asked to investigate his own lodge's Satanic "Worshipful Master." The Order of Nine Angles' A Gift for the Prince states that "human sacrifice is powerful magick": The ritual death of an individual does two things: it releases energy (which can be directed, or stored - for example in a crystal) and it draws down dark forces or "entities." Such forces may then be used, by directing them toward a specific goal, or they may be allowed to disperse over the Earth in a natural way, such dispersal altering what is sometimes known as the "astral shell" around the Earth. This alteration, by the nature of sacrifice, is disruptive - that it, it tends toward Chaos. This is simply another way of saying that human sacrifice furthers the work of Satan.

    There are three methods of conducting an involuntary sacrifice: 1. by magickal means (e.g. the Death Ritual); 2. by some person or persons directly killing the sacrifice(s); 3. by assassination. I haven't forgotten Jean Charles de Menezes. Nor that a motive to his killing, if there is one, most probably resides in a place that would seem to us like madness. What we see in British Freemasonry is an occult organization with a political inclination towards the Right and even Far Right, with deep roots in both the Satanic and the law and order fraternities. One has the motive, the other has the means.

    Perhaps sometimes, the occult elite's horrification of their dumb, useless eaters doesn't require the elegance of programmed assassins and useful idiots. Perhaps sometimes, it's as simple as walking up to a man and shooting him seven times in the head. Because random acts of violence are now public policy. And what energies are released by that? Which dark entities are drawn down? Sometimes, all it takes is a handshake.

  • SOURCE
  • Freemasonry the Truth ebook preview(BRILLIANT)
  • MET COPS WERE (AND STILL ARE) DYSFUNCTIONAL

    met The chief of the Metropolitan Police has said parts of the force were "dysfunctional" before he took over a year ago. Sir Paul Stephenson blamed infighting between senior officers.

    He also said there had been a lack of progress in tackling organised crime across police borders since he took charge at Scotland Yard. Sir Paul's comments came on BBC Radio 4's Today programme in his first major radio interview since his appointment. But he said the Met was a "happier" force than it was before.

    Lower profile

    There was a level of dysfunctionality over a period at the senior level - and I'm not making accusations against individuals - that's in our past
    Sir Paul Stephenson

    BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw says when Sir Paul took up his post he said he did not want to be a "celebrity". The remark was widely interpreted to be a reference to his predecessor Sir Ian Blair, who was seldom out of the headlines. The low point of Sir Ian's tenure came when his most senior Asian officer, Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, publicly alleged Sir Ian had discriminated against him - a claim he later withdrew.

    Sir Paul told the Today programme: "There was a level of dysfunctionality over a period at the senior level - and I'm not making accusations against individuals - that's in our past." Our correspondent says the new commissioner has kept a lower profile than Sir Ian and steered clear of giving views on policing policy. But Sir Paul re-stated his belief that unless some police forces merged they would continue to lack the "capability" to tackle serious organised crime.

    Photo dispute

    Sir Paul also told the programme he did not want tourists and other members of the public stopped and questioned for taking photographs of London landmarks. There is a growing dispute about the way anti-terrorism powers are used to question people photographing high-profile sites. Police have released video footage taken by a man they believe was scouting for a terrorist attack, and who has since been found guilty of a criminal offence and deported. But Sir Paul admitted the powers had to be used with care.

    "We need to recognise that London is an iconic city and people come here to photograph this city and they should be allowed to do it without interference unless there is very, very good reason to suspect somebody doing something wrong," he said. "Occasionally, some police officers might get it wrong, PCSOs [Police Community Support Officers] might get it wrong, it's my job to ensure we get that right balance."

  • SOURCE
  • RUSSIAN COPS BEAT UP DRUNK WOMEN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • OFF DUTY COPS GUN USED BY 3 YEAR OLD TO KILL COUSIN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COP TASERS UNCONSCIOUS DIABETIC 11 TIMES

    Cop Went Wild With Taser, Diabetic Says

    (CN) - A suburban Chicago police officer Tasered a man 11 times while he was having a diabetic seizure, and the 56 seconds of needlessly inflicted electric shock, "inflicted ... while he was lying unresponsive on the floor of his bedroom, permanently scarred [him] and caused him neurological damage that has not abated," the man claims in Chicago Federal Court. Prospero Lassi says he suffered a diabetes-induced seizure at home on April 9. His roommate called 911, and police from LaGrange Park and Brookfield responded, with EMTs from LaGrange Park. Lassi says his roommate explained to police that he was having a diabetic seizure. Lassi "was not alert and could not move his body."

    When the EMTs asked the cops to help them move Lassi from where he was lying on the floor, Lassi says, one of his "arms flailed during his diabetes-induced seizure, striking one of the LaGrange and Brookfield defendants. At no time did Mr. Lassi intentionally strike or offensively touch any of the LaGrange or Brookfield defendants." Lassi says LaGrange Park Officer Darren Pedota responded by Tasering him 11 times, for nearly a minute, as he lay helpless. He was hospitalized for 5 days, and was unable to work for 3 months because of the attack, "and his quality of life has suffered substantially," Lassi says. "At no time did Mr. Lassi do anything to warrant the use of force against him. Mr. Lassi was never cited, arrested, or charged with any crime," according to the complaint. He seeks punitive damages for battery, excessive force, and failure to intervene.

  • SOURCE
  • £107 MILLION TO PAY FOR LONDON'S MASONIC COPS TO TRAVEL FREE

    met cops £107M BILL FOR POLICE RAIL TRAVEL

    Taxpayers have paid £107 million to give London's police officers free rail travel for the next five years. More than 34,000 Metropolitan Police and City of London officers enjoy free travel on trains up to 70 miles from the capital.

    Officers show their warrant card to ticket inspectors to obtain free travel, even when off duty. The two forces have negotiated a new deal with train companies after facing pressure from Government to review its rising cost. It came after they were forced to pay a premium price of £24 million for a one-year extension to the perk in the last financial year. The cost first spiralled in 2006 when HM Revenue and Customs reversed an earlier decision and said free travel was taxable.

    Officials faced an £8 million annual tax bill but reduced this by paying a higher sum to the Association of Train Operating Companies (Atoc). Free travel for officers was introduced on the Tube and buses in London in the early 1970s and it was extended to overground trains in 2002. Senior officers believe it helps to recruit and retain officers who live outside London while cutting crime on the railways. The Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) declined to discuss the cost of the contract because officials said it is commercially sensitive.

    In response to a Freedom of Information inquiry, an official said disclosing the £107 million cost could affect future negotiations and police "strategic plans". A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "The Atoc agreement, negotiated in partnership with the MPA, allows Met officers to travel standard class on trains within a 70 mile radius of central London. We recently renewed the agreement, for a cost-effective five year contract. Making our communities safer is our priority, the latest research suggests that passengers feel reassured and there are regular interventions by our officers on the trains, both on and off duty."

  • SOURCE
  • LONDON'S MASONIC COPS
  • COPS BEAT DRUNK MAN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COSTA DEL COPS SLAMMED FOR BUYING SPANISH VILLA

    Costa Del cops slammed for buying Spanish villa

    WEST Midlands Police Federation is under fire for using its funds to buy a villa on the Costa Del Sol. The union, which represents rank and file officers, has been attacked by one of its members who claims the money should have been put to better use – on the National Police Memorial or Help for Heroes. And there are concerns about the federation’s decision to buy a property in an area of Spain renowned for being a favoured destination for crooks on the run.

    The concerned cop, who does not wish to be named said: “I cannot believe the federation, nationally, is on its knees, and on the quiet, West Midlands is buying a villa. “How dare it vote on such a thing. It should poll the whole force.

    “I am certain the cops would rather the money went to the National Police Memorial or Help for Heroes.” The Costa del Sol has been dubbed the Costa del Crime and has become a haven for fugitives suspected of murder, armed robbery, drug smuggling and other offences over the last 30 years. It was famously depicted in the multi-award winning thriller Sexy Beast starring Ray Winstone as ex-con and expert safe-cracker Gary “Gal” Dove. and Ben Kingsley.

    The federation’s joint branch board voted to buy the property, for an undisclosed price, in October but has yet to decide whether it will be made available to officers in the force to use. Federation chairman Andy Gilbert stressed the money used for the purchase did not come from members’ subscriptions. Last night he angrily rejected claims that the move was inappropriate, and strongly defended the federation’s decision to buy the villa.

    He said: “The money used to buy the villa did not come from members’ subscriptions, it came from the business side of the federation, which makes its money through group insurance schemes and things like that. “This is not a secret decision, it is all laid out in our minutes which were sent to federation representatives. “This is a sound capital investment. As for who will use it, that has not been decided.

    “Unfortunately we cannot just stuff our money into a wardrobe and hope for the best. We need to invest it. “We have only had one single complaint on this issue and it is absolute nonsense. “We probably would have been criticised if we had not made the investment. “This is just someone being mischievous, the type of person who is always complaining that the reps are always off on jollies or stuffing their face at free buffets.”

  • SOURCE
  • COPS v PHOTOGRAPHER IN LONDON'S SQUARE MILE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • INDIAN COPS BEAT UP 5 YEAR OLD GIRL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • THE NIGHTMARE OF LIVING NEXT DOOR TO A MASON AND COP IN ANY DISPUTE

    simon folkes A senior cop who fell out with his one armed neighbour in a dispute over parking arranged for him to be pulled over and arrested - so he would lose his driving licence, it emerged today.

    Sergeant Ray Jones, 45, became locked in a bitter feud with disabled father-of-two Simon Folkes, 53, over parking access outside their homes. Sgt Jones, of Devon and Cornwall police, had previously allowed next door neighbour Simon to leave his car on his driveway. But when the officer told him he was no longer allowed to park there they began a three-year feud with a series of arguments about access.

    Jones then tried to ensure his neighbour would be left without a car by instructing officers to pull him over and quiz him about his licence and insurance. He informed his colleagues where and when Simon would likely be driving and told police to flag him down, a report found. The officers accused him of not being properly insured and Simon was even ordered to take an assessment to prove his driving ability - which he passed.

    But a month later officers then arrived at Simon's home to arrest him for allegedly vandalising Sgt Jones' front gate - but the charges were dropped. Simon knew the details could only have come from his neighbour and he made an official compliant to the police body the Professional Standards Department (PSD). They found Sgt Jones had 'meddled in the private lives of his neighbours' and 'brought Devon and Cornwall Constabulary into disrepute'.

    He has now been disciplined by the force and builder Simon, who lost his arm in a motorcycle accident in 1974, says he 'abused his power'. Simon said: 'Ray owns the driveway but we had a gentleman's agreement that I could park there on one side. 'Then one day he came home and just went mad. He stood nose to nose with me and was just screaming at me - really nasty stuff.

    'It has been a nightmare ever since. He is like any other nuisance neighbour just with the added problem that he is a police sergeant. 'I was pulled over completely unnecessarily and I have even been arrested for something that had nothing to do with me. 'I just wanted to be left in peace. My car was my freedom and he tried to take it away from me.

    'He didn't want me to park outside his house so tried to get my licence taken away to solve that problem for him.' The pair fell out over the driveway in 2006 and Simon, of St Austell, Cornwall, was pulled over in May 2007 as he made his way to a Smart car convention. Officers asked him if he had the correct licence and insurance for his disability and then informed the DVLA that they suspected he was driving illegally.

    Simon said: 'I just noticed the police car parked up and as I passed it started following me and pulled me over. 'I was very suspicious because they seemed to have a lot of information about me and my disability.' Simon then passed a DVLA course and was then arrested for allegedly damaging Sgt Jones' gate but the charges were dropped. The report by the Professional Standards Department found Jones had 'inappropriately interfered' in his pursuit of his neighbour.

    The document, signed by Det Insp Selley, said: 'The officer has meddled in the private lives of his neighbours. 'I am satisfied he has inappropriately interfered in the lives of his neighbours.' A police spokesman said: 'The seriousness of Mr Folkes' allegations, and the need to avoid any repetition of the same, has been fully impressed upon Sgt Jones.

    'All the matters reported to the police have been investigated fully and an appropriate conclusion to the matters has been achieved. 'We are trying to work with both parties to achieve a long-term solution to what is a complicated situation and to comment further would not further any potential for both parties to live happily as neighbours.' Simon and wife Carole have two sons, Jeremy, 23, and Jason, 20.

    The Professional Standards Department is responsible for the investigation of all public complaints made about police officers, police staff or special constables.

  • SOURCE
  • COPS BEAT MY HUSBAND TO DEATH VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • TURKISH COP BRUTALITY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MASONIC COP U-TURN ON PHOTOGRAPHERS AND ANTI-TERROR LAWS

    cop stop Police U-turn on photographers and anti-terror laws.
    Don’t use anti-terror laws to prevent pictures being taken, officers told.

    Police forces across the country have been warned to stop using anti-terror laws to question and search innocent photographers after The Independent forced senior officers to admit that the controversial legislation is being widely misused. The strongly worded warning was circulated by the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) last night. In an email sent to the chief constables of England and Wales's 43 police forces, officers were advised that Section 44 powers should not be used unnecessarily against photographers. The message says: "Officers and community support officers are reminded that we should not be stopping and searching people for taking photos. Unnecessarily restricting photography, whether from the casual tourist or professional, is unacceptable." Chief Constable Andy Trotter, chairman of Acpo's media advisory group, took the decision to send the warning after growing criticism of the police's treatment of photographers.

    Writing in today's Independent, he says: "Everyone... has a right to take photographs and film in public places. Taking photographs... is not normally cause for suspicion and there are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place." He added: "We need to make sure that our officers and Police Community Support Officers [PCSOs] are not unnecessarily targeting photographers just because they are going about their business. The last thing in the world we want to do is give photographers a hard time or alienate the public. We need the public to help us. "Photographers should be left alone to get on with what they are doing. If an officer is suspicious of them for some reason they can just go up to them and have a chat with them – use old-fashioned policing skills to be frank – rather than using these powers, which we don't want to over-use at all."

    Section 44 of the Terrorism Act allows the police to stop and search anyone they want, without need for suspicion, in a designated area. The exact locations of many of these areas are kept secret from the public, but are thought to include every railway station in and well-known tourist landmarks thought to be at risk of terrorist attacks. Many photographers have complained that officers are stopping them in the mistaken belief that the legislation prohibits photographs in those areas. Forces who use Section 44, most commonly London's Metropolitan Police, have repeatedly briefed and guided frontline officers on how to use the powers without offending the public. But privately senior officers are "exasperated, depressed and embarrassed" by the actions of junior officers and, particularly, PCSOs who routinely misuse the legislation. One source said that an "internal urban myth" had built up around police officers who believe that photography in Section 44 areas is not allowed.

    The aberrations have resulted in nearly 100 complaints to the police watchdog. Since April 2008 every complaint made by a member of the public about the use of Section 44 powers, unlike other complaints, must be forwarded to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. In the past 18 months there have been 94 complaints. Eight of these specifically mentioned the fact that the issue arose around photography. Acpo's communiqué has been welcomed by rank-and-file police officers and photographers alike. Simon Reed, the chairman of the Police Federation, which represents England and Wales's 140,000 rank-and-file officers, said: "I think some new guidance will be welcome."

    New orders: The message to officers

    This is the message circulated by Andy Trotter, of the Association of Chief Police Officers, to police forces in England and Wales.

    "Officers and PCSOs are reminded that we should not be stopping and searching people for taking photos. "There are very clear rules around how stop-and-search powers can be used. However, there are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place. Therefore members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so. "We need to co-operate with the media and amateur photographers. They play a vital role as their images help us identify criminals.

    "We must acknowledge that citizen journalism is a feature of modern life and police officers are now photographed and filmed more than ever. "However, unnecessarily restricting photography, whether from the casual tourist or professional is unacceptable and worse still, it undermines public confidence in the police service."

    A personal viewpoint: 'I was reminded why I left the police'

    I spent 27 years as a PC in the Met, but it was during a trip to my old police station with a friend late last year that I was starkly reminded why I eventually decided to leave. Since 2003 I have been living in France, where I coach a children's rugby team not far from Toulouse. But last December my sister needed to see a specialist in Harley Street so I went with her and a rugby friend of mine back to London for the week. While my sister went to the doctors I suggested to my friend, Will, that we should go and take a look at Albany Street police station near Regent's Park, which was where I spent my first eight years as a copper.

    It's the kind of station that looks like something out of Dixon of Dock Green, it has a lovely little blue police light outside the entrance and I asked Will whether he'd take a picture of me standing underneath it. Within seconds we found ourselves approached by two PCSOs who told us that we were not allowed to take photographs of police stations. I didn't want to be a sad old git by telling stories of my past and the nostalgia I felt for the place. So instead I said: "We're tourists. We want a picture of that Blue lamp, it's iconic and it represents London bobbies." But they didn't want any of it and ordered us to stop taking photographs. The second PCSO started asking Will for his details which he began to give before I informed him that he was under no obligation to do so.

    I'd clearly failed what the police call "the attitude test" because they radioed for back-up from inside the police station and we were soon joined by a police constable. Often during my time as a policeman I would hear this policy. If someone was bolshy, argumentative or challenging in any manner, refusing to play by the police rules and not willing to show deference, then they had failed the "attitude test". I guess I hoped the PC would show more common sense but he repeated the same line, that the police station was in a "sensitive zone" and that we had to stop taking photographs. Eventually we gave up and walked away.

  • SOURCE
  • DOCTOR KELLY WAS MURDERED AND SIX DOCTORS DEMAND NEW INQUEST

    david kelly Mystery: Government weapons expert David Kelly

    Six doctors who believe government scientist David Kelly was murdered have launched a ground-breaking legal action to demand the inquest into his death is reopened. They are to publish a hard-hitting report which they claim proves the weapons expert did not commit suicide as the Hutton Report decided. They have also engaged lawyers to write to Attorney General Baroness Scotland and the coroner Nicholas Gardiner calling for a full re-examination of the circumstances of his death.

    The doctors are asking for permission to go to the High Court to reopen the inquest on the grounds that it was improperly suspended. If Baroness Scotland rejects that demand, or the court turns them down, their lawyers say they will have grounds to seek judicial review of the decision. Dr Kelly was found dead at a beauty spot near his Oxfordshire home in 2003, days after he was exposed as the source of a story that Tony Blair's government 'sexed-up' its dossier on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction to justify invading Iraq. In one final phone conversation, he told a caller he wouldn't be surprised 'if my body was found in the woods'.

    The inquest into Dr Kelly's death was suspended before it could begin by order of the then Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer. He used the Coroners Act to designate the Hutton Inquiry as 'fulfilling the function of an inquest'. Lord Falconer, a former flatmate of Tony Blair, was also responsible for picking Lord Hutton to run the inquiry. But the doctors claim that the original inquest was never formally closed and should now be allowed to hold a proper inquiry.

    The six are Michael Powers, a QC and former coroner; trauma surgeon David Halpin; Andrew Rouse, an epidemiologist who established that deaths from cutting the ulnar artery – as claimed in Dr Kelly's case – are extremely rare; Martin Birnstingl, another surgeon; plus Stephen Frost and Chris Burns-Cox. Lord Hutton concluded that Dr Kelly killed himself by severing an ulnar artery in his left wrist after taking an overdose of prescription painkillers but he skated over the controversies about the causes of death. The bulk of his report was dedicated to the political row between Downing Street and the BBC, which revealed the sexing-up of the dossier.

    Dr Kelly's death certificate states that he died of a haemorrhage, but the results of a post mortem examination have never been made public. Crucially, the doctors say that Lord Hutton had no witnesses on oath and did not have to make a finding, as the coroner does, beyond a reasonable doubt. The doctors tried to persuade the coroner to reopen his inquest in 2004 but were rejected because they were not judged to be 'properly interested persons' with the authority to demand an inquiry.

    Now they have hired human rights lawyers Leigh Day & Co to challenge the use of the Coroners Act to close the inquest. A source close to the doctors said: 'Lord Falconer is on record saying this is a "useful little law" but it was set up to avoid multiple inquests in cases where there were multiple deaths. It has been used for victims of train crashes and the Harold Shipman case but Dr Kelly's was not a multiple death.

    'We argue that that's an abuse of due process. The lawyers have sent the letters this week. We have concentrated on the finding on the death certificate that the primary cause of death was a haemorrage. We are spelling out why he could not have died from a cut to the small ulnar artery.' One of the doctors, who preferred not to be named, added: 'When the Romans committed suicide they would slit all four arteries in a warm bath, which keeps the blood flowing. The arteries would close up in the open air and you would not lose that much blood.'

    A book on the unanswered questions surrounding the case by Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker concluded that Dr Kelly may have been murdered by Iraqi exiles – but the finger has also been pointed at MI5 and the CIA. Dr Kelly's family have never commented publicly on his death.

  • SOURCE
  • Dr David Kelly: doctors start legal action for new inquest
  • COPS ABUSE THEIR OWN CHILDREN

    Police Officers sexually assault their own children

    Yes, I said it:

    "The Police have lost their way. They fight each other; they abuse their partners; and they sexually assault their own children". If any of you believe that the comment in my email subject makes me prejudiced towards cops, go to hell. You are not even a reasonable person for thinking such, so don't you dare try to report me to any authorities because it won't do any good. No one will listen to you.

    Now, replace the word "Police" with "Jews", or "Blacks", or "Natives", or "Italians", or "English", or "Serbs", or "Europeans", or "Orientals" and especially gays, lesbians, homosexuals, lawyers and judges. Even more importantly how about newspaper barons, tv executives ,news presenters or journalists.

    If you fall into one of those groups and are included in that statement, would my accusation upset you a little? Piss you off, even? Infuriate you? Would you insist that I apologize, at the very, very, very least? What if I was your boss and I could fire you on a moment's notice if you complained? Would you feel the need to walk on eggshells a little? What if I publicly admitted that I felt that way towards your race and I was a cop? And what if I didn't care that you think the accusation is unfair? And what if you and your race have known for years - and have proof - that I, as that cop, had repeatedly taken you out back of buildings and into desolate fields and, with no one looking, kicked the shit out of all of you whenever I knew that I could get away with it?

    Well...

    London Police Chief Murray Faulkner admitted to making that very comment publicly, although he used the word "men" instead.

    And yesterday, I - and, in fact, ALL men and ALL women who are offended by his comments - were told by the London Police Services Board, politely of course, to go f*ck ourselves. It doesn't matter that we provided the London Police Services Board (and the London Police, previously) with proof that we have suffered almost as bad a fate at the hands of Murray Faulkner as the Blacks did in the US at the hands of prejudiced, murdering bigots in the 60's and prior. They don't care. To quote London Mayor Anne Marie DeCicco-Best, London City Councillor Gord Hume and the other two members of the London Police Services Board, in response to my allegation that Faulkner's comment was demonstrative of his ACTUAL biased practices against men:

    "We do not think that a reasonable person hearing those remarks would believe that the Chief is prejudiced or harbors a disposition against men."

    Do you agree with them? How could anyone, given the fact that such a comment was as discriminatory to men as it would be to Blacks or Jews or Native Indians, had he decided to direct his prejudice to a race instead of a gender? I suggest that if you do not agree with the LPSB, that you should agree to sign a petition that I am putting together and that you should also agree to share the petition with everybody possible, so that everyone signing that petition is speciically admitting that they consider themselves to be a reasonable person and they feel that Faulkner's comment does indeed show a bias against men.

    Remember, please, that what is even more important than Faulkner's prejudiced comments is that he has gotten away - for years - with subjecting men and their children to very real abuse, due to his ability to ensure that arrests - and non-arrests - occur solely at HIS OWN command. This, I respectfully suggest, is the beginning of the end for Murray Faulkner's reign of terror on Londoners.

    More to follow.

    Brad C

    P.S. Please feel free to share this - and the related information that will follow - liberally.

    COPS HAVE ZERO RESPECT FOR THE LAW VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • UK MASONIC COPS DESPERATE TO ENSURE ONLY THEY HAVE GUNS

    Ex-soldier faces jail for handing in gun

    A former soldier who handed a discarded shotgun in to police faces at least five years imprisonment for "doing his duty". Paul Clarke, 27, was found guilty of possessing a firearm at Guildford Crown Court on Tuesday – after finding the gun and handing it personally to police officers on March 20 this year.

    The jury took 20 minutes to make its conviction, and Mr Clarke now faces a minimum of five year's imprisonment for handing in the weapon. In a statement read out in court, Mr Clarke said: "I didn't think for one moment I would be arrested. "I thought it was my duty to hand it in and get it off the streets." The court heard how Mr Clarke was on the balcony of his home in Nailsworth Crescent, Merstham, when he spotted a black bin liner at the bottom of his garden. In his statement, he said: "I took it indoors and inside found a shorn-off shotgun and two cartridges.

    "I didn't know what to do, so the next morning I rang the Chief Superintendent, Adrian Harper, and asked if I could pop in and see him. "At the police station, I took the gun out of the bag and placed it on the table so it was pointing towards the wall."

    Mr Clarke was then arrested immediately for possession of a firearm at Reigate police station, and taken to the cells. Defending, Lionel Blackman told the jury Mr Clarke's garden backs onto a public green field, and his garden wall is significantly lower than his neighbours.

    He also showed jurors a leaflet printed by Surrey Police explaining to citizens what they can do at a police station, which included "reporting found firearms". Quizzing officer Garnett, who arrested Mr Clarke, he asked: "Are you aware of any notice issued by Surrey Police, or any publicity given to, telling citizens that if they find a firearm the only thing they should do is not touch it, report it by telephone, and not take it into a police station?" To which, Mr Garnett replied: "No, I don't believe so."

    Prosecuting, Brian Stalk, explained to the jury that possession of a firearm was a "strict liability" charge – therefore Mr Clarke's allegedly honest intent was irrelevant. Just by having the gun in his possession he was guilty of the charge, and has no defence in law against it, he added. But despite this, Mr Blackman urged members of the jury to consider how they would respond if they found a gun.

    He said: "This is a very small case with a very big principle. "You could be walking to a railway station on the way to work and find a firearm in a bin in the park. "Is it unreasonable to take it to the police station?"

    Paul Clarke will be sentenced on December 11. Judge Christopher Critchlow said: "This is an unusual case, but in law there is no dispute that Mr Clarke has no defence to this charge. "The intention of anybody possessing a firearm is irrelevant."

  • SOURCE
  • COP BEATS HANDCUFFED MAN IN CELL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MARICOPA COUNTRY SHERIFF'S SNEAKS DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENCE ATTORNEY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MINNEAPOLIS COP TASERS MAN WITH HANDS ON CAR VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • LONDON RACIST COP BRUTALITY AGAINST BLACK POSTMAN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • UK'S THUG COPS BEAT INNOCENT PEOPLE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • UK'S MASONIC COPS CATEGORIZE POLITICAL ACTIVISTS AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS

    big brother BRITISH COPS HAVE NEVER PROTECTED THE PUBLIC BUT ARE THERE PRIMARILY TO PROTECT A CORRUPT BRITISH STATE, ITS MONARCHY AND THE EVIL MASONIC HIERARCHY AND THEIR ENSLAVEMENT NETWORK OF THUGS AND BULLY BOYS.

    British police inspectors have been building a massive, secret database containing personal information on thousands of otherwise innocent political activists, an investigative report revealed Sunday.

    "The hidden apparatus has been constructed to monitor 'domestic extremists', the Guardian can reveal in the first of a three-day series into the policing of protests. Detailed information about the political activities of campaigners is being stored on a number of overlapping IT systems, even if they have not committed a crime." The UK paper added that the term "domestic extremist" has no legal basis, but is instead intended to tar those who may have participated in something so benign as civil disobedience.

    Even merely attending a protest and standing on the outskirts of the crowd can be enough to land one on the National Public Order Intelligence Unit's list of "domestic extremists."

    The database, which is operated by some 100 employees, gets £9 million in public funding, the paper reported. In addition to giving officers the ability to search for an "extremist" by name, vehicles associated with individuals tied in to the database are automatically tracked across the country by a system of license plate recognition cameras. In one instance, the paper revealed that a man who attended one protest was stopped by police 25 times in just three years because his vehicle was tagged with a "protest" flag. "Police surveillance units, known as Forward Intelligence Teams (FIT) and Evidence Gatherers, record footage and take photographs of campaigners as they enter and leave openly advertised public meetings," the Guardian added. The paper further noted that the database was first establish to curb legal infractions being committed by animal rights activists, but has grown outward ever since, even though the groups initially targeted are not nearly as active. Activists are divided up into four groups: Extreme right, extreme left, animal rights and anti-war. Groups roped in to the database even include those that have never been associated with any illegal activity.

    "The term 'domestic extremism' is now common currency within the police," a Guardian editorial published Sunday explains. "It is a phrase which shapes how forces seek to control demonstrations. It has led to the personal details and photographs of a substantial number of protesters being stored on secret police databases around the country. There is no official or legal definition of the term. Instead, the police have made a vague stab at what they think it means. Senior officers describe domestic extremists as individuals or groups 'that carry out criminal acts of direct action in furtherance of a campaign. These people and activities usually seek to prevent something from happening or to change legislation or domestic policy, but attempt to do so outside of the normal democratic process.' They say they are mostly associated with single issues and suggest the majority of protesters are never considered extremists." Authorities told the Guardian that the public should not be alarmed at the revelation; that the database is for their own safety. They insisted that spying, compiling data on and tracking the movements of political activists is merely meant to protect businesses from financial harm amid political unrest, and to guard against terrorist attacks.

  • SOURCE
  • MORE UK MASONIC COP THUGGERY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FORMER COP FORCES GIRL TO PERFORM SEX ACT AT GUNPOINT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • ACTIVISTS TARGETED BY UK'S MASONIC THUG COPS

    cop demo The roads were empty when Linda Catt and her father drove their white Citroën Berlingo into London on a quiet Sunday morning. They could not have known they were being followed.

    But at 7.23am on 31 July 2005, the van had passed beneath an automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) camera in east London, triggering an alert: "Of interest to Public Order Unit, Sussex police". Within seconds Catt, 50, and her 84-year-old father, John, were apprehended by police and searched under the Terrorism Act. After filing a complaint, the pair, neither of whom have criminal records, discovered that four months earlier, a Sussex police officer had noticed their van "at three protest demonstrations" and decided, apparently on that basis, it should be tracked.

    The two anti-war campaigners were not the only law-abiding protesters being monitored on the roads. Officers have been told they can place "markers" against the vehicles of anyone who attends demonstrations using the national ANPR data centre in Hendon, north London, which stores information on car journeys for up to five years. Senior officers have been instructed to "fully and strategically exploit" the database, which allows police to mark vehicles with potentially useful inform-ation such as drink-driving convictions.

    The use of the ANPR database to flag-up vehicles belonging to protesters has resulted in peaceful campaigners being repeatedly stopped and searched. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act reveal Kent and Essex police deployed mobile ANPR "interceptor teams" on roads surrounding the protest against the Kingsnorth power station, in Kent, last year.

    The files reveal the pressure police placed on the local Medway council to assist with the installation of cameras on lamp-posts. Sergeant Keith Waymont, Kent police's ANPR manager, wrote to the council three months before the demonstration to complain its officials were not co-operating. He wrote: "When I put this to my bosses, they were less than impressed, given the importance of this operation as the new power station build is likely to create a considerable number of jobs for Medway." But council officials had reasons to object. Internal emails reveal they were concerned temporary cameras could "alienate the community". One wrote: "I agree – under what powers are they looking to do that? Everyone has a right to drive down a road unless we are returning to the miners dispute tactics of the 1980s." Police eventually succeeded in mobilising the Kent ANPR system, which appears to have been used to monitor protesters since four years ago.

    The marker was placed on Catt's van on 10 March 2005 by a PC Sayer, of Sussex police, who had noticed it at anti-war protests. Sussex police told Catt the marker was placed because her van was "associated" with protests which had given rise to "crime, disorder and the deployment of significant resources". After she submitted a complaint, senior officers found their officer's actions had been "proportionate and appropriate", a finding upheld on appeal to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which concluded that while her case highlighted the concerns over "the civil liberties or protesters", police had been acting in accordance with "national policy". Catt has since discovered from Greater Manchester police that footage of her protesting at last year's Labour party conference, which she drove to in her van, is being stored on the National Public Order Intelligence Unit database. Another protester, an IT manager who only wants to be known as John for fear of police retribution, said he was stopped more than 25 times in two and half years after a "protester" marker was placed against his Mercedes SUV. He said police were giving him inconsistent explanations for the stops.

    "I heard every excuse under the sun: 'We've heard reports of suspicious vehicles in the area' or 'We're keeping an eye on high value vehicles moving through the area,'" he said. "One or two officers would be a bit more honest and say: 'Your number plate has flagged up on our system, we don't know why.' This was happening all over the country." He finally decided to complain after a police armed response unit stopped him onduring an evening out with his wife in March 2008.

    Documents revealed a marker "requiring stop checks" had been placed on his car by Lancashire police in 2006 after he attended a protest, described by the local paper as "peaceful", against duck and pheasant shoot near Preston. Lancashire police said the marker had been placed "for a policing purpose" and due to "concerns about the nature of your involvement" in the protest".

  • SOURCE
  • ARMED COPS NOW ON STREETS OF UK VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • SAN BERNARDINO COPS BRUTALLY BEAT DRIVER WITH BATON VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • HOW KIDS LEARN THE MEANING OF RESPECT FROM THUG COPS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • STUDENTS REVOLT OVER BRUTAL COP ARREST AT WESTERN ONTARIO UNI VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • Officials at the University of Western Ontario in London are defending the violent arrest of a student that was captured on video and posted on YouTube. The video, shot on Wednesday at the university's social sciences building, shows what appears to be five campus and police officers surrounding the man and pinning him to the ground. The officers knee and punch the student several times before they are able to restrain him.

    They appear to be trying to put handcuffs on the man while repeatedly shouting, "Stop resisting!" Elgin Austen, the head of campus police, told a news conference Thursday that by the time he arrived during the arrest, he didn't see "anything out of order" with the level of force being applied. "It was being conducted consistent with the Ontario Police College and the training that officers have there."

    The student council said it has heard concerns about the incident from "thousands of students," and is working with the university to find out more about what happened. Austen said people seeing just the video alone "may not understand what the officers were actually doing. "What the officers were doing was trying to apprehend a strong individual ... and not injure that person and keep other people around safe."

    'Disoriented and threatening'

    Campus police first knew something was awry at the social sciences building when they received a call at 5 p.m. from a student who reported being followed by a man. Campus police later received calls that a "disoriented and threatening individual" was trying to enter offices on two different floors in the building, the university said in a statement. He eventually barricaded himself inside a seventh floor office, said the university.

    When two London police officers came to investigate, the man came out of the room and "charged" the officers, the university said. A third officer arrived and tried to apprehend the man, but he broke free and headed for the main floor. When he got there, a campus officer stopped him as he tried to flee. More London police officers arrived, and they managed to tackle him to the ground. After the man was apprehended, he was sent to hospital and released into police custody at 3 a.m. on Thursday.

    London native Irnes Zeljkovic, 22, has been charged with mischief under $5,000, assaulting a peace officer, resisting arrest and escaping lawful custody. The fourth-year social sciences student is described as being about 6 feet and 2 inches tall and weighing more than 200 pounds.

    DOLTON COP BADLY BEATS UP SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • Dolton cop caught on camera in student's beating is in jail on rape charge
  • UK'S MASONIC POLICE STATE DESPERATE TO KEEP THE SHEEPLE UNARMED

    Homemade Expedient Firearms Update on Homemade Firearm author

    A while back I expounded on a citizen's right and duty to be ready for defending themselves against criminals and tyrants, with a link to the website of Philip Luty, tinker-extraordinaire, who authored Homemade Expedient Firearms, in which he shows plans for a working submachine gun made from common household materials. Working because he actually made it, in spite of the UK's laws against the peasants having guns of pretty much any type, and for his troubles the government there locked him up for 5 years; it would've been only 4, but they buggered up his parole because he was fairly unrepentant about the whole thing.

    Being incarcerated only served to piss him off, so he decided to branch out, from a book of his plans to the whole freakin' Internet, documenting his developing hobby of amateur gunsmith, tho without the ability of testing his creations anymore, because of constant government scrutiny. They even resorted to arresting his father and brother on the trumped up charges of "conspiracy" in '05, despite the evidence of Luty's own tesimony of planning and working alone. I had noted, with some concern, that his website had become "forced dormant" in recent months, and today I find that it is because Mr Luty has been jailed once again, for "aiding and abetting" some alleged "terrorists" who were found in possession of his book. The UK government refuses to disclose where he is being held, they barely admit that they do have him in custody, and they further refuse to describe in any detail what the charges are and who the other suspects and the details of their case. In an attempt to win some favor in his case, his family has taken down the body of the website, thus the "you are here" post on it, but without any other explanation.

    You know, this makes me glad the US told them what to do with themselves 230-something' years ago, and with the current trends, I hope that Texas will do the same to the US soon! Then maybe we can offer him political asylum if he wants to leave there (once he's released from prison again), since as a convicted felon he's otherwise having tremendous difficulty in getting a Visa, and he is suffering from cancer, which means he probably isn't going to get preferential treatment under their oh-so-wonderful national socialized health care, and can't leave the country to seek treatment elsewhere.

  • SOURCE
  • A Threat to Freedom of Speech in England by Philip Luty
  • EXPEDIENT HOMEMADE FIREARMS at Palladin Press
  • LEGAL ACTIVIST DAVID EMSLIE CHARGED FOR HAVING A PICTURE TAKEN WITH A REPLICA GUN
  • LEGAL ACTIVIST MAURICE KIRK CHARGED FOR TRYING TO SELL A DEACTIVATED MACHINE GUN FROM HIS OLD MILITARY PLANE
  • G20 MARTIAL LAW IN PITTSBURGH VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • G20 PROTEST COPS TRAP STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • G20 PITTSBURGH PROTEST COPS USE TEAR GAS AGAINST STUDENTS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • JUDGE DISMISSES ANIMAL CRUELTY CHARGES AGAINST COP WHO HAD SEX WITH COWS

    robert melia Cops and their extra curricula activities.

    A New Jersey judge has dismissed animal cruelty charges against a cop accused of committing a sex act with young cows, saying a grand jury had no way of knowing whether the animals were "tormented." Moorestown police officer Robert Melia, who is currently suspended, allegedly engaged in oral sex acts with five calves in Southampton in 2006. Since New Jersey currently has no law explicitly banning such an act, prosecutors in Burlington county brought animal cruelty charges against Melia, the Philadelphia Daily News reports.

    Judge Morely said it was questionable that Melia's acts, though "disgusting," constituted animal cruelty. "I'm not saying it's OK," Morely said. "This is a legal question for me. It's not a questions of morals. It's not a question of hygiene. It's not a question of how people should conduct themselves." The dismissal reportedly irked the prosecution.

    "I think any reasonable juror could infer that a man's penis in the mouth of a calf is torment," a Burlington County assistant prosecutor, Kevin Morgan, said. "It's a crime against nature." The judge's dismissal does not mark the end of Melia's legal woes. He, along with girlfriend Heather Lewis, was arrested in April 2008 for sexually assaulting three girls over a five-year-period. Authorities investigating those charges reportedly uncovered videos on his computer of a girl being "subjected to sexual activity" in addition to taped encounters between Melia and the calves.

  • SOURCE
  • G20 ARREST IN PITTSBURGH BY CAMOUFLAGED SNATCH SQUAD SEPT 09 VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • G20 STORMTROOPER ARREST HITLER WOULD HAVE BEEN PROUD OF VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MASONIC MET COPS ARE A BUNCH OF RAPISTS

    masonic met These are the thugs charged with dealing with complaints about domestic abuse, yet they are the ones carrying out the attacks.

    Met officer accused of raping victim who dialled 999

    A Met police officer has been arrested for allegedly raping a woman who had dialled 999 for help after an assault. The police constable was with several officers who went to the woman's flat in Bromley after she was allegedly assaulted by her boyfriend in a drunken argument. The officer, who is in his 30s, was left alone with the woman after his colleagues arrested her boyfriend for assault. The policeman then stayed with her and gave her half a bottle of whisky to drink before he allegedly forced her to perform a sex act. The woman, who is in her twenties, later dialled 999 again and police returned to her home.

    She was said to be “distraught” after the experience and was taken to a rape counselling suite for examination. The officer who is based at a south London police station was subsequently arrested and is now on bail while the incident is investigated. A Met Police spokesman said: “A police constable was arrested on Saturday 19 September on suspicion of raping a woman whilst on duty.

    "He was taken to a south London police station and has been bailed to return in November pending further inquiries by officers from the Metropolitan Police's Directorate of Professional Standards.” The incident comes as the Independent Police Complaints Commission reports a 30 per cent rise in the number of complaints of sex assaults by police in the UK. There were 114 complaints of sex attacks last year, 32 of them in the Met.

    Senior IPCC sources say there is concern at the numbers of officers who appear to be taking advantage of women in vulnerable positions. They believe the figures show that more women are prepared to make complaints rather than reflecting an increase in the numbers. One source said: “It shows there was always a problem but the extent is now only becoming clear. The numbers are comparatively low but this is police officers abusing their position of trust with people who are vulnerable.”

  • SOURCE
  • UK'S MASONIC THUG COPS HITLER WOULD BE PROUD OF VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • PROSTITUTE COP ACCESSED POLICE FILES ON RIVAL AGENCIES

    victoria thorne WPC jailed for working as £100-an-hour call girl while claiming she could not survive on police wages

    A policewoman who lived a double life as a £100-an-hour call girl was jailed for 15 months yesterday. Victoria Thorne, 29, entertained up to 20 clients a week as part of the Notorious Girls escort agency. She went on to access highly sensitive police intelligence files to obtain information on rivals for the couple who ran the agency.

    Thorne, who used the working name Kelly, posed provocatively in her underwear on the agency's website and proclaimed herself 'very eager to please'. But she refused to wear a uniform or serve clients from the Sunderland area where she served as an officer, Newcastle Crown Court heard. Having worked for another escort agency, Christony Companions, between September 2006 and early 2007, Thorne approached Notorious Girls boss Neil Lock about working for him in February 2007. She even offered to use her own flat as a brothel, the court was told. Sentencing her, Judge John Evans said: 'It is plain that those who thought they knew you, and knew you well, are at a loss as to how you came to be involved in such a seedy world.' Thorne joined Northumbria Police as a constable in June 2002.

    Caroline Goodwin, prosecuting, said: 'She should have had a bright and promising future but she chose to breach the trust that had been placed in her as a police constable. She was effectively leading a double life.' She added: 'She was a willing participant in this. Her phone was examined and she clearly had a good relationship with Neil Lock because that relationship led to her being tasked by him to obtain information. She was corrupted and allowed herself to be corrupted.'

    Thorne was among 70 other women on the website which boasted: 'Rest assured that high quality is for certain and your satisfaction is guaranteed.' She entertained clients at hotels throughout the north east. But she was kept under police surveillance and was seen meeting representatives of Lock. For months she accessed the police computer to identify Lock's rivals as he sought to expand his business 'greatly' across the North.

    John Elvidge, defending, told the court: 'She has by her gross misjudgment lost her career, home and her immediate prospects. 'By her great folly she has lost everything, including her reputation.' Thorne, of Washington, Tyne and Wear, was among eight women and six men arrested after a year-long investigation into organised prostitution and corrupt public officials across Northumbria, County Durham, Greater Manchester, Cleveland and the Scottish Borders. The operation was led by her own Northumbria Police force.

    Thorne admitted misconduct in a public office. Lock, of Galashiels in the Scottish Borders, and his wife Natalie made at least £2,000 a week from their escort agency. He admitted a series of charges including running brothels, aiding and abetting Thorne's misconduct and possessing an unlicensed shotgun and liquid Ecstasy. He was jailed for four years.

    His wife was given a suspended sentence after admitting managing prostitutes and brothels and perverting the course of justice. His 60-year-old father Nigel, from Manchester, was fined after admitting keeping a brothel for the agency in Bury. The three storey building was split into rooms each fitted with a jacuzzi and shower, the court heard.

  • SOURCE
  • NOW COPS TOLD THEY CAN USE TASERS ON CHILDREN

    taser The relaxing of restrictions on the use of the weapons comes despite warnings that they could trigger a heart attack in youngsters. Until now, Tasers - which emit a 50,000-volt electric shock - have been used only by specialist officers as a "non lethal" alternative to firearms. However, they can now be used against all potentially violent offenders even if they are unarmed.

    It is the decision not to ban their use against minors that is likely to raise serious concerns. Home Office Police Minister Tony McNulty said medical assessments had confirmed the risk of death or serious injury from Tasers was "low". But he failed to mention Government advisers had also warned of a potential risk to children.

    The Defence Scientific Advisory Council medical committee told the Home Office that not enough was known about the health risks of using the weapons against children. Tasers work by firing metal barbs into the skin which then discharge an electrical charge which is designed to disable someone long enough to allow police to detain them safely. The committee, which is made up of independent scientists and doctors, said that limited research suggested there was a risk children could suffer "a serious cardiac event".

    It recommended that officers should be "particularly vigilant" for any Taser-induced adverse response and said guidance should be amended to "identify children and adults of small stature" as being at potentially greater risk from the cardiac effects of Tasers. The Government scientists were also asked to test whether the weapons could cause a miscarriage if used on a pregnant woman. While not saying whether police would be allowed to Taser an expectant mother, the Home Office said the DSAC committee had "specifically asked" for computer simulations to be carried out to analyse the effect on "a pregnant female".

    Amnesty International claims Tasers have been responsible for 220 deaths in America since 2001. Many cities and police forces there have banned their use against minors. Two years ago in Chicago a 14-year-old boy went into cardiac arrest after being shot with one. Medics had to use a defibrillator four times to resuscitate him.

    Taser International, the American firm that makes the device, said tests on pigs suggested the weapons were safe. The Association of Chief Police Officers, which issues guidance to forces on the use of weapons, said Tasers would be made "readily available" for "conflict management" at incidents of "violence and threats of violence of such severity that they will need force". Non-firearms officers in ten forces will be trained to use the weapons. Every incident they are involved in will be assessed over a 12-month trial period.

  • SOURCE
  • MIAMI COPS PULL GUN ON TERRIFIED INNOCENT STUDENT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • $495,000 SETTLEMENT FOR MINNEAPOLIS COP'S BEATING OF INNOCENT BYSTANDER

    eldridge chatman Eldridge Chatman stumbled into a police raid, and an officer's reaction was costly on many levels.

    One punch by a Minneapolis police officer to a man walking to his mailbox cost the city almost $500,000.

    After a closed-door City Council meeting with Mayor R.T. Rybak and Police Chief Tim Dolan, the council publicly voted 12-0 Friday to pay Eldridge Chatman $495,000 in a settlement over a punch from officer Craig Taylor. Chatman required two brain surgeries because of bleeding in his head caused by a subdural hematoma. Chatman, now 53, was living in public housing and on assistance when he stepped out of his apartment shortly before noon on April 11, 2008. As he walked down the hall, he encountered seven Minneapolis police officers in helmets and goggles crouched and preparing to execute a high-risk search warrant, possibly involving narcotics, in an apartment near Chatman's, according to a federal lawsuit he filed.

    There's no dispute that Taylor was the lead officer and that both he and the man behind him carried submachine guns. Although Taylor tried to signal to Chatman to get out of the way, Chatman remained in front of the doorway the officers sought to enter. Taylor then struck Chatman once in the head. Chatman's lawyer, Bob Bennett, said Friday there was no reason to use force on Chatman because he posed no threat to the officers and did nothing wrong. Bennett noted that blows to the head specifically should be used rarely and only when an officer is threatened. Chatman likely didn't see the hand signals from Taylor, Bennett said. "You're looking at the business end of two submachine guns held by people who obviously would fire them if you did the least thing wrong," he said.

    Several other six-figure settlements have been paid out in the past decade in incidents involving Minneapolis police. They include $612,000 awarded a family in December after a mistaken police raid on their house in 2007. A family member, fearing intruders, fired a shotgun and police shot back. There were no injuries.

  • SOURCE
  • VICIOUS DOG ATTACKS COP THEN UNBELIEVABLY GIVEN BACK TO OWNER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • THE LARGEST STREET GANG IN AMERICA ARE BRUTAL COPS VIDEO

    DID MASONIC COPS COVER UP A RESCUE OF KIDNAPPED JAYCEE DUGARD IN NOV 2006? VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • AEROSOL SNIFFING HOMELESS MAN CATCHES FIRE WHEN TASERED BY COPS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • OZARK COPS TASER CHILD 19 TIMES LEAVING HIM IN A COMA VIDEO

    CHINESE COPS SHOOT ROBBER 6 TIMES AT CLOSE RANGE MISSING EVERY TIME VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • NEW ZEALAND'S FIRST TRANSVESTITE COP

    lurajud On September 9, 2005, Christchurch Police Constable Stephen Lurajud became Constable Sarah Lurajud. The date is etched in her mind. For 45 years she had lived as a male. For 20 of those years she was married.

    But even before she went to kindergarten, she knew she was a female trapped inside a male body. Her story, as the only police officer in New Zealand history to undergo a sex change, is told in her own words for the first time in a report published by the Human Rights Commission today.
  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • OHIO COP TASERS DOG VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • IDAHO COP ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ASSAULT DURING ARREST VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FORMER UTAH PROFESSOR SUES OVER COURTROOM TASER INCIDENT VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • BRUTAL COP WHO BEAT WOMAN IN CUSTODY REINSTATED VIDEO

  • Board reinstates Willis, says city violated his rights
  • AFTERMATH OF 7 MINNEAPOLIS COPS BEATING OF DRIVER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FBI TO INVESTIGATE 7 COPS BRUTAL BEATING OF SPEEDING DRIVER VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • Police dash cam:This video from a police car of the arrest of 42-year-old Derryl Jenkins contains strong language. The audio is from police radio and from a cell phone message left by Jenkins on a friend's phone.
    Minneapolis Police Chief Tim Dolan said today he will ask the FBI to investigate an incident in which a squad car video captured police punc More..hing and kicking a man as they tried to arrest him in February after a stop for speeding. AUDIO STARTS AT 1.30

    UK MASONIC COPS CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH FINES(OR ANYTHING ELSE FOR THAT MATTER)

    policeraid British cops cannot be trusted with fines(or anything for that matter), magistrates warn

    In an extraordinary attack, the Magistrates’ Association said it is a “certainty” that officers will misuse powers because they cannot be “relied on” to handle them appropriately. The comments have been made as part of the Magistrates’ Association response to the Government’s plans to allow police to issue £60 fixed penalties for careless driving. Police have been accused of increasingly dealing with offences using on-the-spot fines as an easy way to hit the government’s crime targets.

    Magistrates are worried that the number of offences now dealt with in this way is keeping some serious offenders out of the courts. However, police leaders insisted that the use of the fines, which has risen sharply under Labour, helped to reduce paperwork and free up officers’ time.

    It leaves two of the key bodies responsible for tackling crime and administering justice at loggerheads. MPs expressed surprise that magistrates would have accused police of being untrustworthy.

    Alun Michael, a Labour member of the Commons justice committee and former policing minister, said such “grandstanding” was not helpful and both parties needed to address the issue. Paul Holmes, a Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: “It is a sorry state of affairs when the Government’s push for instant justice is driving a wedge between different parts of our criminal justice system. “The police have been given wide-ranging powers without adequate debate. It is deeply concerning that even judges think they will abuse them.”

    Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, added: “This is the reality of a criminal justice system after a decade of government interference in policing.” The Government’s proposals would make careless driving a fixed penalty offence, meaning those guilty being handed an on-the-spot fine and given three points on their licence. Currently, those suspected of careless driving are prosecuted in the courts where they can face a fine of up to £5,000 and up to nine points on their licence. Chris Hunt Cooke, chairman of the Magistrates’ Association road traffic committee warned against this. In his response, he said: “Regrettably, recent experience with out-of-court disposals shows that the police cannot be relied on to use them appropriately or as intended.

    “Once they have been given these powers, the police will misuse them, that is a certainty, and careless driving will be generally treated as a minor offence, unless serious injury is involved. “This is a proposal that places the convenience of the police above what is right in principle, may coerce innocent drivers into accepting a fixed penalty, and is certain generally to downgrade careless driving in terms of offence seriousness.” Mr Hunt Cooke, a magistrate for 13 years, said the offence is a subjective matter, unlike speeding or driving with no insurance, and any judgement of how serious that is should be made in a courtroom.

    He said police officers will be “prosecutor, judge and jury, deciding on guilt and then sentencing the offence” . “Faced with the choice between the heavy burden of taking the matter to court and the simplicity of issuing a fixed penalty, it is certain that many police officers will opt for a fixed penalty, however bad the driving may be.” The Association of Chief Police Officers refused to address the accusations that officers could not be trusted to administer fines appropriately.

    However, Mick Giannasi, Gwent Chief Constable who is in charge of roads policing for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said: “By dealing with offences in this way, it can result in a reduction in the amount of time that police officers spend completing paperwork and attending court, while also reducing the burden on the courts and the taxpayer.” Hundreds of thousands of fixed penalties are handed out by police every year, including almost 1.5 million for speeding offences alone.

    Police have been given increasing powers to hand out fines since Labour took power in 1997, mainly through the introduction of the penalty notice for disorder in 2004. The fines can be handed out for so-called “low-level” offending such as littering, criminal damage, being drunk and disorderly and shoplifting.

    The number of such fines has increased more than three-fold from 63,639 in 2004 to 207,544 in 2007, the most recent figures available. The Magistrates’ Association has already said fines are being used for “inappropriate offences”, including a warning that too many shoplifters are avoiding court by being handed them.

    Earlier this month, the Commons Justice Committee described the growth in out-of-court penalties as a “fundamental change” to criminal justice. Mr Michael said it would be “nonsense” to roll back time but both the magistrates and police “need to understand why there is an issue here”.

    He added: “It is not helpful to have this sort of grandstanding, whether it is from the Magistrates’ Association or from Acpo. “It is an issue but it is not a cataclysmic case for a major division between the magistrates and the police.”

    The Department for Transport is due to report back on its proposals to make careless driving a fixed penalty offence later this year. It has already been criticised by taxpayer groups and motoring campaigners who warned police will take the easy option of handing out fines. They also warned minor accidents and many trivial motoring offences, such as eating, drinking or smoking at the wheel, could lead to fines.

    Careless driving covers a wide range of behaviour from minor inattention to driving that is only just below the level of dangerous. The Magistrates Association fears drivers who believe they are innocent will not risk challenging the fines in court while those guilty of serious offences just short of dangerous driving will escape harsher punishment. A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: “Bad driving puts other drivers, cyclists and pedestrians at risk.

    “Making careless driving a fixed penalty offence would help the police to enforce against bad drivers who admit fault with a minimum of bureaucracy, freeing up police resources. “But all drivers would always have the option to contest their case in court and we would work with the police and the courts to develop guidance to ensure that cases are handled correctly.”

  • SOURCE
  • DANISH POLICE BRUTALITY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • WOMAN TASERED BY NEW YORK COP DURING TRAFFIC STOP VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • SOUTH OZZIE COPS DONT REMOVE WOMENS CLOTHES AS A MATTER OF COURSE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MAN SITTING ON PORCH TASERED IN FOLSOM CALIFORNIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • WASHINGTON COPS PULL FAMILY OUT OF FUNERAL PROCESSION VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • HOW INDEPENDENT IS THE INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS COMMISSION?

    demenezes Public confidence in the police took a knock after the death of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 protests in April. As videos of police violence spread like wildfire on YouTube, their actions were roundly condemned by politicians and the media. Things have died down for the moment. With the MPs’ expenses scandal and Westminster going into meltdown police chiefs must have been quietly relieved when the public’s attention shifted elsewhere.

    Investigations into police misconduct continue at the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). But what exactly does the IPCC do? Is it effective? And who does it serve?

    Formed in 2004 following the Police Reform Act of 2002, the IPCC replaced the widely discredited Police Complaints Authority (PCA). Like its predecessor, it oversees complaints made against the police. It can also carry out its own investigations into the most serious cases. But most of the time police forces (sorry, police ‘services’) still investigate themselves. Since April 2006 its supervisory role has expanded to include HM Revenue and Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency, and as of April 2008 the UK Borders Agency too. Officially independent from the police, political parties and interest groups, its eighteen commissioners cannot be former police officers. Decisions are also supposed to be free from government interference. But the commissioners are appointed by the Home Secretary and funding comes from the Home Office. And if you were Home Secretary, would you appoint people who might seriously undermine confidence in law and order? Policing is very political after all. Moreover, most of the investigators are former or current police officers. How does it remain impartial, when its investigators have spent so much time on one side of the ‘thin blue line’?

    There was early criticism before the IPCC was even set up. Inquest and the United Friends and Family Campaign (UFFC) were two groups who suggested the need to actively recruit from ethnic communities and from outside the police profession. They were ignored by the government. UFFC, a coalition of families fighting for justice for those who have died in police custody, believed the changes to the old PCA were “largely cosmetic”, rather than the “sweeping reforms” needed. The IPCC seemed little more than another piece of government spin, failing to do much more than add the word ‘independent’ onto its headed notepaper. Five years down the line and these fears appear to have been founded. A year ago a High Court judge described IPCC thinking as “fatally flawed”. In one of the most recent stirs, an officer, who admitted changing his notes about the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, was found not guilty of “deliberate deception”. The shooting of the innocent de Menezes at Stockwell tube station has been the most high profile of the IPCC cases, which the Justice4Jean campaign has been constantly frustrated with. “This weak and woefully poor excuse of a watchdog must now be overhauled and replaced” was their reaction to this latest twist in the inquest.

    The IPCC’s response to the death of Ian Tomlinson seemed to be similarly hopeless. First it unquestioningly reproduced inaccurate London Metropolitan Police statements, claiming that Tomlinson had died of natural causes, and only got into gear when a member of the public posted a clip on the internet of a riot policeman knocking him down. Misleading IPCC press statements have unfortunately been pretty common over the years. Add to this the fact that no police officer has ever been convicted of murder or manslaughter, despite over 400 deaths in police custody in the last ten years alone, and the credibility of IPCC ‘independence’ looks fairly shaky. In February 2008 over 100 specialist lawyers quit the IPCC’s advisory board, due to the organisation’s “pitifully poor” response to concerns about favouritism to the police, incompetence, delays, and indifference and rudeness to those complaining. Even the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee admits the IPCC fails to adequately engage with complainants and local communities.

    Many accept that the police have a ‘hard job’. Surveys have shown that the majority of people do trust the IPCC. But this isn’t the whole story. Many don’t complain. Reasons include people’s lack of confidence in themselves and the system, and lack of access to support and assistance. This is particularly true for black and Asian communities, where faith in the police is fragile at best thanks to experiences of widespread misconduct. Those who do complain often find the process frustrating and IPCC staff unhelpful and rude. Complainants have no right to legal advice or representation, while police officers are given the full backing of their forces. No wonder so few challenges make headway. Increasingly people are resorting to suing the police in the courts instead. They see the IPCC as a toothless regulator which only serves to whitewash police wrongdoing. Complaints processes can drag on for years. Cases like de Menezes and Tomlinson are really the tip of the iceberg. Roger Sylvester, for instance, died in 1999 after being restrained by six police officers under the Mental Health Act. It was 2007 by the time the IPCC announced there would be no disciplinary actions against them, despite a High Court verdict of unlawful killing in 2003. His cousin described how the police had been allowed to “avoid scrutiny and accountability by the IPCC washing its hands of the case”.

    Time and again the IPCC has proven ill-equipped to deal with allegations of police racism, brutality, unlawful arrests and even deaths in custody. In the rare cases when police misconduct is properly investigated (if they’re even reported), they tend to be covered up as ‘isolated incidents’ to be dealt with internally. Scenes from the G20 show how many officers consider themselves above the law, while others don’t even seem to understand it properly. As recently as June, London Met officers were accused of torturing suspects in drug raids at the end of 2008. Meanwhile, videos posted online showed police in Nottingham tasering a man, already subdued, while another repeatedly punches him as he lies on the floor. At least ordinary people are getting on with it, filming the police at every turn. Unless the IPCC steps up its game, it may not be long before it goes the way of the old PCA. Good riddance? Many with experience of the IPCC would say yes. With anti-terror laws, eroding civil liberties and increasing police powers real accountability in policing could hardly be more urgent.

  • SOURCE
  • OAKLAND: DRUNK FAN GETS TASERED DURING BASEBALL GAME VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • VIRGINIA COPS TASER PREGNANT MOTHER AT BAPTISM PARTY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • COPS TASER DEAF MAN VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • TORONTO POLICE HEADQUARTERS MASONIC SYMBOLS (NO SOUND) VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • THE FTAC BEHIND THE UK'S NEW FASCIST PSYCHIATRIC GULAGS

    beaker The UK government has established a secretive new police unit a la George Orwell with the powers to detain anyone for any length of time without any due process. The shadowy unit called the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was covertly established in 2006. The unit includes the services of police psychiatrists. Why? For one very good reason, and one reason only: psychiatrists operate above the law. They can detain ANYONE AT ANY TIME AND FOR NO MORE REASON THAN THEIR STATED OPINION THAT THE PERSON MAY BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR TO OTHERS.

    Once forcibly detained by a psychiatrist a person can be legally locked away forever and subjected to despicable treatments such as psychotropic drug regimes, lobotomies and electric shocking of the brain. They are not entitled to a trial of any sort, they need face no criminal charges. A person incarcerated by a psychiatrist has no rights whatsoever. Even Stalin had to produce his prisoners in court eventually. The miserable occupants of Guantanamo retain the certainty that one day they will face justice, or at least that they will have their day in court; the occupants of psychiatric prisons have no such comfort. It is a thin line that separates a rule of law democracy from a totalitarian dictatorship. The FTAC crosses that line. For many years our individual freedoms have been incrementally cut away. The FTAC rips the flesh off freedom and lays bare the bones of repression for all decent and honest people to see. The FTAC represents nothing less that the repeal of Habeas Corpus with its right of trial and its protection from arbitrary state detention.

    A Writ of Habeas Corpus orders that a prisoner is to be brought before a court so that the court can then determine whether that person is serving a lawful sentence or should be released from custody. The prisoner, or someone acting on behalf of the prisoner if he/she is being held incommunicado can petition the court or an individual judge for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The justification for the extreme powers of FRAC is of course terrorism. Experience shows that the powers of the FTAC will be quickly exercised in a far wider sphere than even the most skeptical imagine. Once a law is enacted the very fact of its existence gives it respectability and thus acceptability. For years society casually turned a blind eye to the total lack of Human Rights for anyone labeled ?mentally ill?, never dreaming that the definition might one day be widened sufficiently to cover not only themselves, but everyone who may for any reason be deemed a threat by those in authority.

    In the twenty-first century mental illness is presumed to be the normal circumstance and sanity deemed to exist only after ?treatment? by a psychiatrist. We live in a nightmare world that is starting to exceed the imaginings of even George Orwell. Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) tasked to intimidate critics of Jacqui Smith?

    The UKColumn was shocked to learn that a member of the public, who wrote letters and emails calling the Home Secretary a communist and criticising her for creating a police state, has been summoned for an interview with his GP. The individual, who wishes to remain anonymous, informed the Column that he was recently surprised to receive a call from his GP asking him to attend the surgery. Once in front of his doctor, Mr X was stunned to be told that the GP had received a letter from the highly secretive Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) following instructions from the Home Secretary herself. Although embarrassed, the GP understood from the communication that he was required to interview Mr X to establish his ?state of mind?.

    The implications of this incident are extremely serious, as they suggest that anyone who dares to criticise the Home Secretary, or perhaps even the government itself, will be regarded as mentally ill. Clearly for Mr X, Smith's actions were intended to be a warning and the first step in attempting to brand him mentally ill.

  • SOURCE
  • ONE OF OUR OWN GROUPS EXTREME EXPERIENCE INSIDE A MASONIC RUN PSYCHIATRIC GULAG
  • JAILERS CLEARED OF ABUSE DESPITE SHOCKING VIDEO RELEASE VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • JEFFERSON COUNTY MAN SHOT WITH TASER DURING COURTROOM OUTBURST VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • MORE COP ABUSES, PERSECUTIONS AND HARASSMENT