MASS MEDIA

  • FULL LIST OF MEDIA TOFFS HERE

    • ZIONIST MEDIA PROPS UP UK'S DICTATORSHIP

    UK dictatorship Britain's media are in full swing in the run up to an election.

    Like America the only political parties being promoted are the 'ABUSE OF MEN FOR PROFIT PARTIES' as the editors and owners of the major corporate newspapers are masons with ulterior motives to ensure the New World Order direction continues unabated with radical feminist and homosexual agenda's part of their plans to curtail working class heterosexual male power.

    The dictators of this world know it is the strength of heterosexual men that have brought down these evil bastards throughout history and why they take such efforts to use their media goons to demean and smear men at every opportunity to protect their own wealth and power created on the backs of their masonic satanic control network.

    The 'ABUSE OF MEN FOR PROFIT PARTIES' have a clear agenda that is reflected in how the whole media circus is geared to ignoring their crimes and the crimes of radical feminists and homosexuals with selective news reporting that fails time and again to expose criminality from many quarters but concentrates primarily on the criminal conduct of working class men, giving the illusion that crimes are ONLY ever committed by that group while the rest hide behind the facade of unbiased news reporting at least from their very warped perspective.

    There are many political parties operating across the UK but you will seldom if ever see them getting the platforms they need to access public opinion. The mass media have carefully crafted news and opinion polls that only promote 'ABUSE OF MEN FOR PROFIT PARTIES' at the utter expense of lesser parties and to the dire consequences of men who will continue to be berated by the same corporate media that distorts and lies its way through the promotion of the dictatorship that masquerades as democracy in the UK. The political goons that have held power throughout history have consistently protected the establishment rich at the utter expense of the poor and working classes and despite their attempts to suggest we have CHOICE the same 'ABUSE OF MEN FOR PROFIT PARTIES' consistently fail the majority of the population yet WE GET LITTLE OR NO CHOICE.

    The browbeaten and brainwashed British public need to know what lies behind this agenda. Without a strong heterosexual population the dictators will continue their tyranny and why men are being weakened financially , spiritually and psychologically in divorce courts were the real powers of the masonic judiciary kicks in. That is were the tyrants and royal thugs create the atmosphere for tyrants to flourish backed up by the 'ABUSE OF MEN FOR PROFIT PARTIES' . Those parties proven to be controlled and funded by the Rothschilds pulling their strings behind the scenes.

  • MORE POLITICAL SCAMS HERE
  • The U.S. Personal Income Tax: It Goes to The Family Rothschild

    		•
    NEW YORK TIMES CONFLICT OF INTEREST OVER ISRAEL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    THE CFR CONTROL AMERICAN NEWS MEDIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    DAN RATHER ON HOW CORPORATIONS OWN A COMPLICIT NEWS MEDIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    CHOREOGRAPHY OF NEWSPAPERS AND POLITICS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    GOVERNMENTS MAY BAIL OUT NEWSPAPERS

    THE CORPORATE MEDIA HAVE PROVIDED THE PROPAGANDA, SMOKESCREENS AND FEAR TO ALLOW WESTERN GOVERNMENTS TO GET AWAY WITH ABSOLUTE MURDER, IS IT ANY WONDER THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO SEE THEIR DECLINE?

    Sir Martin Sorrell, head of the advertising giant WPP, said governments may have to step in and support ailing newspapers if losses bring them to the brink of collapse.

    Sir Martin said: "Governments probably have to decide whether consolidation and media titles going out of business is the right thing from an editorial point of view." In an interview with Arabian Business, he compared the situation to the recent state support for the banks. "You could argue that newspapers provide a vital service," he said. "It's the same issue, whether the state should intervene in certain issues to help preserve a service. That is what every piece of welfare economics is based on."

    The media has suffered declining revenues since the onset of the economic downturn, which led to the worst advertising recession in living memory. Since then, many media groups have been looking to alternate sources of revenue, such as charging for online content, to make up for the decline in advertising. Sir Martin cited The Guardian as an example. "In the long-term it can't go on losing money," he said. "So let us say, hypothetically, that The Guardian could not continue to lose money after a certain period, then you would have to think about whether the Government should subsidise it, or whether you give tax advantages to people to subsidise it."

    He added that in thinking of models to bail out media organisations there were "plenty of ways to skin that particular cow". Sir Martin said that while the advertising losses are slowing there was still no sign yet of a recovery. In October he said that economic Armageddon had been averted, and market conditions were "less worse".

  • SOURCE

    		•
    HOW TO REPORT THE NEWS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    DE-HYPNOTISM

    masonic The question is not who among us has been hypnotized, the question is who has not.

    The un-hypnotized man or woman finds him or her self in a sea of people who cannot see past their blindness. This is the reason why the truth teller cannot break through to the “skeptic”. For this reason one must first place him or her self in a position to see and only when they do so can they ever hope to glimpse the truth. Under most circumstances the chances that a man or woman wakes up are very slim indeed and there are good reasons for this. Modern hypnotists are not turbaned magicians in dark robes holding a pocket watch. They wear business suits and swim suits and their disguises are virtually impenetrable by the target of their efforts. They are very effective and have charmed all but a fraction of a percent of all people in the world. Many wake up but again fall under the spell over and over. They get a glimpse but do not know what has happened. Slowly they succumb to the droning of the hypnotist´s tools of the trade.

    If one does not understand the nature of hypnotism and its awesome power to shape every aspect of our lives and perception then they cannot hope to break through to freedom. Why is modern hypnotism so effective in our “modern civilized age”? Trust is the key to hypnotism as one cannot be hypnotized if they do not trust the hypnotist. One might assume that one must trust a man or woman, to be hypnotized by, them but they seldom understand that ideas and concepts in which we place our trust are equally mesmerizing and are as effective as any human hypnotist. One who is skeptic of people may believe him or her self immune but they can easily be hypnotized voluntarily by introducing false information that clouds their perception such that they alter their perception around, most notably, a false view of reality. This conditioning starts very early with our parents demanding that we accept their authority and expect us to trust blindly what they say without verification. The worst thing a parent can do to their child when the child asks “why?” is to tell them “because I said so”. It is better so say “I do not know” or even better “figure it out for yourself”. This automatic conditioning creates an individual that moves from one trust relationship to another or from one hypnotist to another and creates an un-ending chain that takes diligence and persistence to break. The teacher hands you a book and because we trust our teacher, sometimes without condition, they introduce us to a carefully crafted false reality that leaves us a slave in fear of pain, suffering and death such that we are convinced that the powerful determine our lives for us.

    So refined and sophisticated has this art become that we rarely even discover that it is perpetrated against us through nearly every aspect of our daily lives. Trust the teacher, trust the government, trust your elders, trust the intellectual, trust the judge, trust the doctor and we can never hope to break the cycle. When you look at how modern college education merely swamps a young mind with information and demands complete regurgitation without being give time to judge the validity of the information, it sets up a drone that loses all sense of identity that is forever held in an invisible cage they cannot even perceive is there.

    The repetition and cross-confirmation between, what we are told, are diametrically opposed doctrines further convinces us to accept what we are told. We base our perception regarding science on assumptions of reality presented to us in religious doctrine. The false ideas of chance, probability, purposelessness, luck and individual powerlessness are not scientific in origin but are en grained in us by religion. That's right. We take the bad assumptions and perceptions that we are subject to the will of things out of our control from religion. Science then bases much of their theory and experimentation on these false assumptions. Can there be true objectivity if one cannot fathom critical false assumptions that are specifically designed to undermine our “objectivity”? No. What can science actual prove objectively when our reality is wholly subjective to each of us individually? They can really prove nothing. Our movies, literature, religion, science, history, philosophy, psychology, cosmology and worst of all the media all work together to form an impenetrable barrier to waking up as they all reinforce the same false reality. The challenge to the hypnotized is daunting in that most of the hypnotists do not even recognize they are themselves hypnotizing. Even worse we are hypnotized to forget we have been hypnotized. There are even safety valves incorporated into the system in the event one begins to wake up. Peer pressure is applied to return the waking people back under the spell. When one starts exposing the truth to another, that falls outside of the traditional hypnotic perception, in speaking with another, we are conditioned to automatically reject the speaker and the information. In fact, one of the clues is people simply use the tool of saying the word “conspiracy” and that effectively shuts down the flow of truth in a conversation and anything that is said prior is quickly thrown into the mental trash bin. One must try it for him or her self and objectively observe the results. As far as conspiracy, when one goes to the convince store for a pop they conspire with the clerk to secure a needful thing.

    The typical statement is: “If there was such a conspiracy, how can so many people keep something secret?” How indeed! When the whole population uses the same fallacious argument every single time without even questioning its validity is really quite amazing. The answer to the question is that the population itself cannot allow itself to view this conspiracy even though it is perpetrated right in front of them over-and-over constantly throughout their day. Even worse, how are those, who are part of the “conspiracy”, even to expose the “conspiracy” if they cannot recognize that they are one of the participants and to people that have been rendered largely unable to accept its existence in the first place? How does one wake up and stay awake? We must all first accept that we might be hypnotized. We must then take careful stock and prove that our most basic assumption about our reality is actually proven first-hand rather than something we are given to accept. This can be rather uncomfortable in that we start from a position where we doubt our own sanity and must overcome society's pressure to shoehorn ourselves into the model of reality someone else has deemed “normal”. We must start from the position that we know nothing that we have not proved conclusively to ourselves individually. In this way skepticism is valuable. That is difficult when our egos work against us to ensure that we remain “correct” so that we know what we believe and believe what we know. We have to fight our tendency to automatically submit ourselves to the authority of another. Again, that is not easy. Another weakness in this modern hypnotic mechanism is that it must be continually reinforced. After roughly 22 days of repetition we can be made to accept contrary information. It helps to remove one's self from the stimulus as much as possible. Turn off the TV, stop reading the newspapers, turn off the music and spend some time in nature. Nature in a remote area is free of this content, provided it is outside of a city where the sounds and electromagnetic waves help lull us to sleep. We must stop the tenancy of accepting the information we get as the truth and break the trust cycle. It is not wrong to believe new information provided it is first rigorously tested with personal experience and experiment.

    Do not fall into the "second opinion" trap, as one must assume that every man and women are equally confused. Just because a billion idiots believe something it does not mean that something is the truth. Test it for yourself through a logical and sound repeatable process. That which one believes now must be marked in their minds as “suspect pending further review” and one-by-one we must revisit these assumptions and test them. If they are found to be suspect then discard them. Take it from those who have endured this process: much of what we assume as truth is false. That is a healthy way to approach one's reality. Blind acceptance leads to general blindness with a persistent deluded sense of “apparent sight”. Many are thinking, “How bad can TV be? I don't watch the stuff on the networks just science and the history channel.” There is nothing of value on TV. It is a false reality creator. I watched a two-hour presentation on the curse of the Kennedys as they revisited the tragedy in their family. In two hours they never even approached the idea that there may be a reason for it. We are left to conclude it was a function of “bad luck”. Just bad luck and do not ever forget how it can happen to you. Does that conditioning worthless programming help anyone determine purpose and meaning? There is a reason for the tragedy in the Kennedy family. This reason, I am sure, they at least are fully aware of.

    On the science channel we are presented with Standard Model Cosmology, exclusively, and we have convinced ourselves that the universe will expand to the point where it will go dark and everything is dead. We then are left to come to the conclusion that nothing matters anyway. We might as well rob, cheat and steal because there cannot be this thing we call God and it does not matter anyway. To make their theory work they have to invent this thing called dark energy and dark matter. We cannot see it or measure it, but it is there. We are left to take this drivel on faith never questioning the fact that what they propound is theory based on bad assumptions where they do not have the least amount of integrity to admit it. It is more religious then religion but we call it empirical science. Just overlook the fact that their explanations for things the cannot explain very nearly include fudge factors and reliance on ethereal unseen dimensions and forces. OOOOOO Weeeee OOOOO OOOOO! Standard Model Cosmology is only one of many theories out there that we never have an opportunity to entertain. Why? The reason is that the removal of hope brings us to a point where we must be dependent on those who think they rule to save us from ourselves. It is a reality based on powerlessness and enslavement and it is no wonder why it is promoted with such enthusiasm. Our reality, such as it is spun today is that we are not sovereign, not responsible and have no chance of ever regaining power over our environment and ourselves. Why bother? Just take your lumps like everyone else because that is all you will get. Trust us and be thankful for the pitiful morsel that falls from our plates. We will tell you what to do, what to think and we decide where you are and why. They do not enslave us. We choose to enslave ourselves by merely trusting them to define for us our reality because they decide if you think differently then you are “insane”. They decide what is insane or what is not. Who permits them to do so other then ourselves? Do not listen to me. I am insane. If you listen you might become happy and free and not able enjoy the pain, suffering and misery that the sane man enjoys today. Most of all: sleep well because it is far too scary to wake up and be master of your reality.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    CORPORATE MEDIA NEWS, FACT OR FICTION

    media How much of the corporate media news is actually true? They aren't stupid enough to lie all the time and they have the best psychiatrists and psychologists behind the scenes to ensure their slant on the news appeals to the public. If they report the weather is freezing then looking out the window would quickly confirm if they were lying or not however if they have supposedly reputable scientists saying there is a permanent trend in global warming that is another matter.

    The news may consist of anywhere between 50 to 80 % that may be close to the truth but the rest is very likely to be extreme distortions of political and legal reporting. The reason they deliberately cut films in two to present a news report is that the propaganda has to be consistent and incessant. The mass media has been getting away with absolute murder for a very long time and it is only the internet that has finally provided an alternative to what is the biggest lying and devious network across the globe. ALL of it is run and controlled by the establishment pulling the wool over the peasants eyes to ensure the extremes of capitalism are NOT divulged and how the system has been exploiting and enslaving the masses to provide the opulent lifestyles of the likes of the Rothschilds who have created a banking system that aids the ULTRA rich at the expense of everyone else.

    Never in the history of mankind has this enormous scam had the platform before to show the extreme exploitation of the masses on behalf of the billionaires who have abused us through the corruption of the political and legal systems across western society . The political dupes have never worked for the electors and are place men for the same scumbags sitting on their luxury yachts berthed in thousands of marinas or in their mansions doted across the globe . Any time the news reports credit crunches or housing crashes you can be sure these billionaires have been behind the manufacture of failing banks that ensures the masses continue to be fleeced and live in fear through manipulation of the news . If its not terrorism, banking crashes, wars , homelessness, job losses, global warming, virus's , aids, bombings, drug and alcohol addiction, gun and knife crime and a myriad of other issues that will only ever affect us lesser mortals while the self appointed elite can hide away on their exclusive islands and on their yachts that have been partitioned off from the rest of the peasants where they wine and dine the political goons that go back to their countries to brainwash the public with endless bullshit that the corporate media provide the necessary platforms to continue to keep their victims living in perpetual fear.

    This is like chinese torture with the constant drip of distressing news manipulated endlessly to keep us all worrying and in fear of our lives and makes enslaving us much easier. In the last 40 years there has been increasing intensity in how they are creating so much news that creates the necessary fear to keep us all in our lowly place. The media ultimately have been responsible for the massive injustice and inequality that lets the scumbag elite to pamper themselves with the never ending endless material wealth that few of us will ever taste. It is not that everyone requires billionaire status but without a massive transfer of wealth to rid the world of this massive equality , the media will continue to manipulate the perspective we have of our lives through the eyes of the scumbag billionaires who are only in that position through some of the most enormous scams this world has ever experienced.

  • MORE MASS MEDIA SCAMS

    		•
    CORPORATE MEDIA UP TO THEIR TRICKS AGAIN

    media We are hardly over the New Year and the corporate media have started to push the two main corrupt political parties in the run up to a British election. Since the constant exposures on the internet, it is becoming crystal clear how the media is behind the BIG SELL to convince us we have CHOICE.

    That choice, conveniently for the media mafia, is ONE of the two main parties that even they have been exposing as up to their necks in corruption and sleaze. For the last four years there have been endless exposures of blatant swindling at Westminster by the political windbags yet they are still promoted as the only alternative parties that get the platforms and we are given the distinct impression NO OTHER PARTY is worthy of our vote. The British public seem to be still partially living in the masonic slumber accepting what the corporate media are telling us that is despite mountainous evidence to show they are behind the UK's democratic facade. Instead that we have been living in a dictatorship were no matter what MAIN party you vote for they are all funded by masonic benefactors like the Rothschilds and who ALL swear an oath to the British monarchy before the long suffering British public.

    It is also very noticeable how blatant lies pass for impartial news reporting when time and again the masonic controlled media will only ever provide the platform for the masonic backed political mafia. They seldom if ever give us an alternative and like Kellogs cornflakes the amount of air time directly relates to the the type of cereal we eat . We are having our political breakfasts stuffed down our throats by ENDLESS rantings of a bunch of criminals that should be in jail NOT being paraded on every news station and newspaper that is backed with masonic money. You would think they would try some alternative strategy instead of using a well trodden path that has now been exposed endlessly on the internet.

    OR DO THEY THINK THEY CAN FOOL US ALL AD INFINITUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • MORE MEDIA LIES

    		•
    COMPLICIT MEDIA BEHIND THE PROMOTION OF THE UK'S NWO POLITICAL GOONS

    POLITUBBIES We have been exposing for a very long time that the UK's complicit media are behind the political stooges we are FORCED to vote for come election time. We are NO supporters of the SNP but the latest debacle shows clearly how the British press and television control who gets the platform's to promote their vile political agenda's, that are only marginally different from each other, and exclusively only those parties behind the New World Order agenda and funded by their masonic backers like the Rothschilds.

    The UK is a dictatorship that every four years changes the stooges who all support the same agenda, that primarily protects the rich and their banking buddies and has NOTHING to do with the long suffering electors getting different options. We are ruled by a political class educated at Eton (next door to the House of Windsor) or some other public schoolboy twatties who ensure the monarchy and its thousands of hangers on are kept in the luxurious lifestyles they think they deserve. The token vote we get pays lip service to a supposed democracy that only takes care of the NWO rich who have enslaved British citizens for FAR TO LONG.

    Read the following article that proves what the media are up to.

    Alex Salmond hits out at live TV debates for Brown, Cameron & Clegg

    ALEX SALMOND has hit out at the decision to televise three live, pre-election debates between the three main parties in Westminster - missing out the SNP. The First Minister said: "It is entirely unacceptable to Scotland as well as to the SNP for the broadcasters to exclude the party that forms the government of Scotland - and indeed is now leading in Westminster election polls.

    "If these debates are to be at all relevant to their audiences, they must reflect the democratic reality of Scotland and political diversity across the UK. "And that must include SNP involvement in debates broadcast in Scotland. "The broadcasters have got to meet their public service obligations to audiences across the UK. For them to propose debates which signally fail to do so shows a high-handed attitude."

    He pointedly reminded the broadcasters of the "debacle" of a 1995 BBC Panorama programme - an interview with then prime minister John Major - which it was prevented from broadcasting in Scotland because it breached the rules of impartiality during a Scottish local election. He said that the SNP would now be seeking "guarantees of inclusion" from the broadcasters.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    RUPERT MURDOCH AND THE RISE OF EVIL VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    COMPLICIT CORPORATE MEDIA GET WEALTH STATS WRONG AGAIN

    Once again the complicit corporate media get the statistics wrong about the uneven spread of WEALTH in the UK.

    LESS than 10% of the UK's population owns more than 90% of the wealth and no government throughout its history has made ANY attempt to reverse that trend. Instead all major parties we are expected to vote for are funded by the rich in a charade democracy that is becoming the laughing stock of the world. That percentage is getting much worse for the poor as the ultra rich are getting ever more greedy and devious in how they manipulate the worlds economy to ensure the poor remain ever more poor while the ultra wealthy get richer.

    London is the enslavement capital of the world both through the secret society network of freemasonry that OLD LIZZIE heads as well as the control of London city where most of the worlds SLAVES are bought and sold on the stock market and funded by money provided and printed by the Bank of England. The class system in the UK is the most EVIL network of power and has only survived by removing ALL form of weaponry as a means for the population to fight back. Also a legal system founded on masonic judges ensuring only the ultra rich have any hope of ensuring they keep their wealth while the rest of us are stripped using the most devious and dangerous legal mafia controlled by the Inns of court who also control every bar association across the globe.

    Fifth of households in UK own two thirds of the wealth

    The richest fifth in Britain own 62 per cent of all wealth while the poorest half hold just nine per cent. Household wealth reached £9trillion between 2006 and 2008 with £5.5trillion of that held by the richest 20 per cent, according to the Office of National Statistics.

    Cash in hand: The richest fifth in the UK own 62 per cent of the nation's wealth The average wealth of households was put at £204,500.

    The new wealth and assets survey also showed people are struggling to repay loans while one in ten is in negative net wealth – where their debts outweigh anything they own. Worryingly, just 50 per cent of people saved in the last year, although 37 per cent had put some money away in the last month, the survey showed. Only 40 per cent of men and 32 per cent of women are contributing to a private pension, the ONS found.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    DESPERATE MURDOCH TURNS TO GATES TO TRY AND KEEP NEWS EXCLUSIVE TO HIMSELF

    gates murdoch Murdoch turns to Gates for website help
    Microsoft and News Corp joins forces in bid to make internet news pay

    Microsoft chairman Bill Gates, has agreed to a payments system if Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation takes steps to remove all its content from Google Just as soon as the outline of a possible new model for newspapers to make a better return from content used by aggregator and search-engine sites such as Google emerged, new doubts surfaced that publishers can do anything to plug a dam that has already burst in trying to limit free access to their product.

    Google is at the centre of the debate once again after reports yesterday that Microsoft, which this year launched its rival search engine Bing, had entered talks with Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation to begin paying for top index content from his newspapers, including The Times and The Wall Street Journal, on its pages. According to a report in The Financial Times, Bing would agree to the payments system on condition that Mr Murdoch takes steps to remove all his content, or links to his content, from Google.

    Freezing out Google is something Mr Murdoch has already been talking about as he looks for ways to erect a pay-wall around the websites of all his publications, which also include The New York Post and The Sun. Bing entering the fray could encourage Mr Murdoch to go forward. And, at first sight, it may offer the newspaper industry a glimpse of a not-so-gloomy future, with Microsoft offering a significant new stream of revenue to pay for their continuing high costs. But Google yesterday responded with a verbal shrug. "Publishers put their content on the web because they want it to be found. Google is a tremendous source of promotion for news organisations, sending them about 100,000 clicks every minute. So very few choose not to include their material in Google's index. But the publisher is in control – if they ask us not to include their content, we won't," the company said.

    Implying that it had its own doubts about the viability of what Bing may be offering in terms of payments to newspapers, Google added: "We work closely with the newspaper industry to help find long-term and sustainable models for making money from news." It is widely assumed that Microsoft will be looking to strike a deal not only with Mr Murdoch, even though his stable of publications is extensive and his influence on the industry unquestionable, but with other large publishers as well. Its notion of Bing becoming the first stop for web users looking for news articles instead of Google would presumably work only if a critical mass of publishers were persuaded to turn their backs on Google all at once.

    But most industry observers saw flaws here. As well as wondering if Microsoft would have sufficient funds to offer payments to all the publishers it would need on board, they also questioned the wisdom of Mr Murdoch in attacking Google in a way that essentially attempts to close one of the biggest windows into internet content. "The key thing is that none of this does anything to help users," argued Mike Masnick of the influential website Techdirt. "And these days, that's a strategic error. If your business is focused on making life more difficult for a competitor, rather than adding more value to users, you're doing the wrong thing." A significant bucket of ice water was also thrown on Mr Murdoch's putative strategy during a London conference last week by Biz Stone, co-founder of Twitter. He accused the media magnate of attempting to "put the genie back in the bottle" when it comes to open access on the internet to editorial content.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    LONDON'S MASONIC JUDICIARY SILENCING THE WORLD'S MEDIA

    How libel laws silence our democracy

    Never mind the fatwas, I say, and don't get hyper-agitated by the PC platoon, we who do not find rape jokes hilarious and who rebuff the fond nicknames "Paki" and "retard" and believe careless language can sanction cruelty and injustice. Though accused daily of impeding freedom of speech, we do not have the muscle or money to destabilise that fundamental entitlement. The real pressures that turn to actual curtailments of free expression lie in confidentiality contracts, unspoken loyalties between power and those it seduces or buys up, thought-control in the name of anti-terrorism and the monstrous English libel laws, more draconian than in any other Western nation.

    Feel shame and consternation that London, famed for its energy, creativity and colour is now the libel capital of the world and libel tourism has joined other suspect activities that draw the global wealthy to our shores and shake up the foundations of our democracy. Russian oligarchs, Arab sheikhs, multinationals, media moguls, and South African millionaires love our courts and laws that keep their dodgy affairs away from the prying eyes of the public. Others freely use the system, too. International stars fed up with intrusive and false reports routinely turn to our high-court judges to protect their reputations. Actress Cameron Diaz sued an American newspaper, the Miami-based National Enquirer, in the English courts and won substantial damages. These victories, though in some ways justified, do set off unintended consequences. A select committee hearing took evidence from the New York Times and other US publications. These trials mean some papers – including the Wall Street Journal – may withdraw from the UK and block internet access.

    Authors are being intimidated as well. There was the case taken by a super-rich Saudi businessman, Khalid Mahfouz against the academic Rachel Ehrenfeld, who had written a book on the funders of terrorism alleging Mahfouz was involved. Only 23 copies of the book were sold in the UK but the case went to a British court. Ehrenfeld refused to attend. Some American states, the Senate and House of Representatives are taking action to overturn the decisions of English libel judges. Gagging is now commonplace in science and medicine. Experts in these fields have had to withdraw serious published concerns. Andrew Lewis, who runs a website where some medical claims are discredited, has been forced to pull unsubstantiated and criticised claims made by an osteopath which were already in the public domain. He would have faced libel action for reporting a fact. Dr Peter Wilmhurst, a British cardiologist, is being sued by an American manufacturer of new heart implants because he expressed doubts at a conference about their effectiveness. A scientist, Simon Singh, is still going through the gruelling and potentially crippling libel appeal process after being successfully sued by the British Chiropractic Association for describing as "bogus" some of the get-well promises made by practitioners.

    Publishers, newspapers and broadcasters are now pre-empting libel actions by taking out material that might arouse or upset claimants. YouTube and citizen filming means you can be filmed saying something at a conference or seminar which then gets broadcast, making you vulnerable to the libel jackals. Honest views and opinions are not exempt. Alistair Brett, legal manager of the Times newspapers, believes these laws "have gone bonkers". They are disproportionate, immoral silencing instruments, widely and cynically used. A comparative study of media law by the Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies found that the cost of libel actions in England and Wales is 140 times higher than the European average. After the death of Robert Maxwell, the hope was that libel threats would no longer be allowed to stop legitimate investigations of the loaded and mighty. Incredibly, we went the other way. With a few exceptions, like the redoubtable journalist Tom Bower, who meticulously scrutinises the lives of big men like Conrad Black and Richard Desmond in his well-researched books, beating back the legal brutes who tear into him, most other journalists have had to accept severe limits on what we can broadcast or write about litigious men and women, organisations, institutions and businesses. I cannot even tell you the subjects and people I am not allowed to write about in our baleful new world. Censorship? Surely not? That happens in repressive China and Iran, not here? Yes, in our own backyard.

    The slide into a hushed state is alarming the UN Human Rights Committee, which issued this statement last year: "The practical application of the law of libel has served to discourage critical reporting on matters of serious public interest, adversely affecting the ability of scholars and journalists to publish their work". A new campaign was launched this week by Index on Censorship and English PEN to halt this domination by thought and word controllers. Nobody with a concern for justice and fairness would want a society where anything could be said and anybody maligned without restraint. But the balance in our libel laws has tipped away from good sense into repression. Geoffrey Robertson spoke at the launch. Without using notes, the lawyer spoke with passion that shook the ground beneath his feet: "We have not free speech but expensive speech." Ken McDonald QC reminded us of the iniquity of the law itself which assumes a defendant is guilty until proved innocent. The money involved is prohibitive even for the provably innocent. This must have been the feeling and energy at gatherings of wigged, zealous, conscientious reformists in earlier centuries.

    So heady was the atmosphere that a representative of Carter-Ruck, the infamous libel firm that goes like a hound after complainants, succumbed and agreed we needed to bring down costs. We may have reached a point where even those who gain from our libel laws can see they suck. The campaign must be supported. We have nothing to lose but our chains and gags. Freedom of speech matters most when it is taken away by key players in the establishment. Like now.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    AMERICA'S CORPORATE MEDIA LIKE CNN'S LOU DOBBS VILIFIES MEXICAN MIGRANTS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    RUPERT MURDOCH, FOX CEO A RACIST? VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    LOCAL PAPERS DEFEND THE POWERFUL BECAUSE THE POWERFUL OWN AND FUND THEM

    newspaper boy The idea of democratic flag-bearers died decades ago. I can count on one hand those brave enough to speak truth to power

    They are the pillars of the community, champions of the underdog, the scourge of corruption, defenders of free speech. Their demise could deal a mortal blow to democracy. Any guesses yet? How many of you thought of local newspapers? But this is the universal view of the national media: local papers – half of which, on current trends, are in danger of going down in the next five years – are all that stand between us and creeping dictatorship.

    Like my colleagues, I mourn their death; unlike them I believe it happened decades ago. For many years the local press has been one of Britain's most potent threats to democracy, championing the overdog, misrepresenting democratic choices, defending business, the police and local elites from those who seek to challenge them. Media commentators lament the death of what might have been. It bears no relationship to what is. Most local papers exist to amplify the voices of their proprietors and advertisers and other powerful people with whom they wish to stay on good terms. In this respect they scarcely differ from most of the national media. But they also contribute to what in Mexico is called caciquismo: the entrenched power of local elites. This is the real threat to local democracy, not the crumpling of the media empires of arrogant millionaires.

    Since May, Roy Greenslade, professor of journalism at City University, has been running a series on the Guardian's website called "Why local papers count". It's a brave effort, but it demonstrates the opposite of what he sets out to show. In six months he has managed to provide just one instance of real journalism: a report by the Kentish Express on the inflated costs of upgrading a local road. Otherwise he appears to have found no example of local papers holding power to account. There's one respect in which the local press is confronting power: by campaigning against the free papers published by local authorities. These, the papers say, are propaganda sheets, which provide a biased view of council business. Does that sound familiar? In his book Flat Earth News, Nick Davies cites a survey of press releases issued across two months by Northumberland county council. Ninety-six percent of them were turned into stories by local papers. In many cases the papers copied the releases verbatim; in no case did they add any information. They might as well have been published by the council.

    The failures of the local press are often blamed on consolidation by the big media corporations, which have squeezed as much money out of their collapsing possessions as they can, leaving no funds for real journalism. Davies, for example, asked a reporter on a regional paper to keep a diary for a week. In just five days the reporter published 48 stories. He came across one original story in that period, but he didn't have time to pursue it, so he let it drop. Otherwise he just recycled old copy, lifted stories from other papers or simply concocted them. But this is not the whole reason for the failure of the local press. The Cambrian News, for instance, is owned by the man who is universally hailed as the only success story in local publishing: Sir Ray Tindle. His company, which runs 230 papers, is independent, free from debt and booming, but it suffers from many of the diseases that afflict the rest of the press. When the Iraq war began, Tindle ordered his editors "to ensure that nothing appears in your newspapers which attacks the decision to conduct the war". His letter was reproduced in the Totnes Times, with the following comments. "In a brave move, which could easily be seen by some as censoring the news, Sir Ray ordered that once war in Iraq was declared his newspapers would not carry any more anti-war stories … As editorial manager of eight of Sir Ray's titles, I am proud to say I totally agree with his decision."

    It's true that the vacuity and cowardice of the local papers has been exacerbated by consolidation, profit-seeking, the collapse of advertising revenues and a decline in readership. But even if they weren't subject to these pressures, they would still do more harm than good. Local papers defend the powerful because the powerful own and fund them. I can think of only two local newspapers that consistently hold power to account: the West Highland Free Press and the Salford Star. Are any others worth saving? If so, please let me know. Yes, we need a press that speaks truth to power, that gives voice to the powerless and fights for local democracy. But this ain't it.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    KIETH OLBERMANN'S WORST PERSON AWARD IS RUPERT MURDOCH VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    ZIONIST CONTROLLED CORPORATE MASS MEDIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    NTV

    NTV

    WHITE HOUSE v FOX NEWS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    HOW TO BRAINWASH A NATION VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    CROWN CONTROL OF PRESS CREATES MAN HATING PROPAGANDA

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    • The recent revelations that Vanessa George is a female paedophile who abused tiny children while in her care at a nursery is NOT a one off despite the publicity. The British media have a hidden agenda and highlights the failure to address the extreme danger to children when women abusers are NOT exposed and British judges take a softly softly approach compared to the way men are treated.

    There is method in this utter madness, as the crown are the biggest plunderers of mens assets and without the malicious allegations generated by ex-wives and ex-partners they would struggle to find the excuses to steal mens homes, business's and properties which end up in the MASONIC coffers or the masons who get access at knock down prices to the stolen goods once a masonic judge signs away a mans right to all his worldly possessions. There is a hard core radical feminist group operating within lawyers groups who feed off these lies and deceit. Harriet Harman is a perfect example of the leeches who suggest they help vulnerable women when in fact they are helping themselves to the family assets as many women find out after they have driven the father from the family home and his assets, they then move on to the mother.

    Many mothers are duped into thinking if they go along with this charade they will gain substantially from fleecing the ex-husband. Here lies the reason why the complicit media and judges require to treat MEN as the abusers, while women are the victims. They cannot play this malicious game if to many women, as is now being reported thanks to the internet , of being the abusers and the cover up has gone on for so long thanks to a number of groups actively pressuring the media to suppress this information to ensure the gravy train of heterosexual men being fleeced can carry on unabated.

    This is a complex web of deceit that has allowed judges to manipulate the system to increase dramatically their powers through stealth. Experts estimate that there could be up to 64,000 female sex offenders in Britain yet little or no publicity has been shone on this worrying threat to children due to a conspiracy of GREED that ensures even if the mother has all the traits of Myra Hyndley she is guaranteed sympathy and support from the rogue masonic judges who aid and abet the malicious lies required to remove men from all their assets but most importantly their children. The many children abused by either a separated mother or her NEW boyfriend is the prime reason for that abuse and the failure of the system to ensure the biological father remains the protection against abuse that the vast majority of fathers are desperate to continue and the cause of extreme psychological trauma and suicide among the millions of fathers tortured by these utter scum of the earth . Thanks to the internet those fathers finally have a voice as to the diabolical agenda that has been inflicted on them for far to long. Yes there are a minority of mothers who suffer a similar fate but only if their former husband is part of the creepy satanic network that now consumes the legal systems across the globe.

    The power of the masons is found within the closed and secretive family courts that are dominated not BY JURIES but by self appointed crown mobsters that have high jacked our legal system for their own financial gain.

  • Nursery Paedophile Police Interview Tapes(VIDEO)
  • VANESSA GEORGE REVEALS THE HIDDEN FACE OF FEMALE DEPRAVITY
  • Up to 64,000 women in UK 'are child-sex offenders'
  • Second woman charged over nursery 'child porn' probe
  • Woman teacher exposed as predatory paedophile who abused 100 young children
  • Council nursery closed down after two arrested over porn allegations
  • Nursery sex abuse victims may never be identified
  • When women are MORE evil than men
  • Abuse woman's husband 'suicide bid'

    		•
    THE FUTURE OF JOURNALISM VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    NEWS CAN NO LONGER BE OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY A CENTRAL POWER

    media What is the core problem of today’s newspaper industry? What is the central challenge of the Internet to the old certainties of the news business?

    According to Clay Shirky, the New York University professor of new media and the author of the 2008 international hit book Here Comes Everybody, the central problem is that there isn’t a central problem. It’s the disappearance of the centre, Shirky argued when he and I spoke at Ryerson University in Toronto last weekend, which is most undermining the old industrial newspaper industry with its top down hierarchies and tangible centres of power.

    Perhaps Shirky will entitle his next book Everything Changes. According to him, the Internet does indeed change everything, absolutely everything, about the news industry. The digital revolution collapses audience and author, making what he called “the shock of inclusion” the democratising cultural force of our new interactive age. The Internet undermines traditional news bundling, forever unstitching the necessity of combining disparate content in a single product. Internet technology does away with the oligarchy of newspaper publishers, enabling anyone to publish anything they like in real-time at minimal cost on an always-on global network.

    Shirky is, of course, absolutely correct. The core reality of the Internet is its absence of a centre. The distributed Internet, all edge and no heart, has done away with the centralised structures of power of the old industrial world. And without a core, the news can’t be controlled by a central power. It can no longer be owned. The Internet is like a blob, a centreless yet all powerful monster, impossible to destroy and yet able to devour everything in its path.

    In a wonderfully scary 1958 movie, Hollywood imagined the Blob as a fictional horror story. Today, however, the blob has become a not-so-wonderfully-scary monster for the old media powers-that-be like News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch and the American Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unfortunately, neither Murdoch nor the FTC were in the Ryerson University audience last weekend. They therefore still have faith in the old industrial organisation model. They still want to own the news. They imagine they can become the new centre of the internet. They think they can kill the blob.

    Murdoch, in particular, could do with a dose of Shirkyian wisdom. Old media’s most battle-scarred warrior seems to think he can take on the Internet and survive. His latest warlike manoeuvre is to build a big wall around all News Corp content on the Internet and then charge subscribers to access the news. The storied Australian pugilist, the man who used to own the news in old industrial economy, is trying to rope off the blob from the millions of Internet users who aren’t paying for their content. According to Murdoch’s The Man Who Owns The News biographer, Michael Wolff, the 79 year-old News Corp chairman is ready for a final, winner-take-all battle with the internet. “Rupert To the Internet: It’s War!” screams the title of Wolff’s latest dose of Murdochia in this month’s Vanity Fair magazine: “He relishes conflict and doesn’t back down—one reason why he’s won so many of his fights and so profoundly changed the nature of his industry…. Now he’s going to war with the internet.”

    The only problem, of course, is that Wolff has his metaphors mixed up. Going to war with the Internet is like fighting the ubiquitous Taliban in Afghanistan. It’s a never-ending, always-on battle without a core. It’s like wrestling with the blob. And so Murdoch’s “war with the Internet” in which he tries to rope off his digital properties from the digital masses is likely to be his last stand. For all his glorious victories in the past, the old News Corp general will probably be remembered as Custer and the war against free Internet content threatens to be Murdoch’s admittedly noble yet militarily catastrophic Battle of the Little Big Horn. Like Rupert Murdoch, the American Federal Trade Commission has a bit of a Custer complex. Once the sheriff of the industrial media ecosystem, the FTC – as the self-styled protector of American consumers – is now trying to lay down centralised rules for determining the veracity of online information. Like Murdoch, the FTC has declared war on the internet. And like the News Corp war against free content, the FTC war against dishonest content is unwinnable.

    The FTC has turned its punitive gaze to online news and information and it doesn’t like the increasingly murky distinction between advertisers and content producers. What this centralised Federal body wants to reestablish is the clear church-state division between content and advertising that used to exist in the old industrial economy. Going after bloggers and tweeters who take payola from sponsors, the FTC intends to fine online content creators $11,000 per violation. But for all the nobility of its purpose, this FTC initiative is patently absurd. Should you really be fined $11,000 for authoring a 140 character tweet favouring a product? Will the FTC also fine dishonest reviewers on Amazon, Yelp and the thousands of other user-generated consumer review sites? And what about anonymous commentators on blogs – should they also be fined $11,000 for failing to reveal their commercial ties with the manufacturers of products that they are critiquing? No, rather than Custer, the FTC resembles King Canute, fighting a heroic rearguard action against the tide.

    As Clay Shirky argued last weekend at Ryerson University, the Internet has so confused and collapsed the distinction between audience and author that the ethical rules of the old economy no longer work. The old dichotomies of content and advertising, once governed from above by all-powerful, centralised organisations like the FTC and News Corp, have been made increasingly redundant by the internet. Here Comes Everybody, Shirky warned in 2008. He was right. Unfortunately, however, neither the American Federal Trade Commission nor Rupert Murdoch seem to have noticed the arrival of everybody on a stage that they once monopolised. They better wake up soon to this new reality, however, before they get consumed by the insatiable blob.

  • SOURCE
  • THE FUTURE OF JOURNALISM(VIDEO)

    		•
    CORPORATE MEDIA COMPLICITY AND CONSPIRACY

    media2 While the UK's corporate media continually analyze what has gone wrong with the economy once again and as ever looking for scapegoats it is in fact the same corporate media that are at the heart of why the UK has an utterly flawed democracy and the MAIN cause of why we are once again in the mess we're in.

    The British media have a HIDDEN agenda that masks a devious and dangerous network of power that ultimately controls our whole democratic process , a process that protects the British establishment while condemning the slaves to that regime. In the run up to the next general election the only parties they will be promoting have LONG histories of fraud and corruption , but we wont hear any alternatives as the two(or three) major party system, that we have been forced to vote in for so long, is protected by giving constant media attention to the leaders at the expense of most of all the other alternatives. ONLY major parties that are corruptly funded by high ranking masonic benefactors like the Rothschilds have any hope in hell of getting air time, and it is the British media that controls who gets the platforms to ensure the long suffering browbeaten and brainwashed public ONLY get to know the ring leaders agendas of the massive political scam that has fooled us all until the birth of the internet and any alternative perspective .

    The corporate media is wholly controlled by ultra rich establishment families pulling the strings behind the scenes of their duped masonic goons who have blatantly disregarded truth and justice while spinning the massive propaganda required to let us believe they have our best interests at heart. Nothing could be further from the truth as they hold up the real aristocratic spongers in the UK as some sort of godly creatures while continually attacking the poorest sections of society who are least able to defend themselves against an ULTRA rich monarchy and its multi-tier hierarchy of hangers on, who all eat out of the gold encrusted trough.

    The charade is slowly disintegrating, as they know the tide is turning onto the internet alternative view of politics and NOT as a means to ensure the class system is reinforced, but removing it brick by brick to ensure truth and justice is what drives the UK not the evil lies and deceit that masquerades as corporate NEWS.

    Some of the corporate media strategy to program us can be listed by the following , that gets endlessly recycled to reinforce the propaganda.

    1. There are ONLY two, or at the most, three parties worthy of our vote.

    2. Homosexuality is the promoted agenda for the UK while they undermine heterosexual family life.

    3. The British monarchy and their clique are promoted to GOD LIKE status while the poor are condemned as the cause of ALL of Britain's ills.

    4. That heterosexual men, not part of their creepy masonic satanic agenda, are vilified in the most grotesque way . A requirement that ensures masonic CROWN judges have good excuses to freely remove all their worldly possessions , homes and children to line the coffers of the masonic trough. Something they are ALL working to reinforce with women previously married to masons facing the same fate.

    5. That the former British Empire was good for the world and still operates behind the scenes across the globe were countries that sought independence remain controlled by the masonic, legal and banking networks headed by the United Grand Lodge of England , Inns of court, and Bank of England in London, and ensures the English crown remains the dominant force across the globe .

  • How UK's corporate media undermines democracy promoting only a two party state
  • CORPORATE JOURNALISTS COME FROM WEALTH AND ELITIST HENCE THE DISTORTIONS

    		•
    DISTRICT 9 TRAILER AND HOW HOLLYWOOD CONDITIONS US FOR THE NWO MAFIA VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • District 9 - A Science Fiction Film With Sophisticated New World Order Propaganda

    		•
    CATCHING THE MEDIA USING NEURO-LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING PART 1 VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    • PART 2 PART 3 PART 4

    AMERICAN MEDIA ATTACKED AS OBAMA'S NAZI BROWNSHIRTS VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    WELCOME TO DIGGERLAND

    digger George Binning hunts down the controversial James Cruickshank, editor of Glasgow’s infamous Digger magazine

    Imagine a publication with such relentless and detailed crime reportage that even the most scandalous tabloid journalists turn their backs in disgust. Imagine this magazine’s editor retreating underground and working from a secret office to evade the death threats he receives from the infuriated criminals and gangsters that fill its pages. Welcome to Digger land, please check your sense of all that is good and true in at reception.

    I met with James Cruickshank, the Digger himself, to discuss why his publication both thrilled and appalled me. I also spoke to David Graham Scott, creator of the documentary: “The Dirty Digger”, who worked as a Digger photographer and filmed his experiences at the paper. Cruickshank has had quite a turbulent career; In 2003 he was ejected from the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) for an allegedly libellous article in a union newsletter about Paul Holleran, National Organiser for the NUJ, “It was absolutely ridiculous,” he told me, “It just reinforced allegations that the NUJ is a communist organisation. It’s out to protect its own members and wants to bring the industry to its knees.”

    The Digger started in August 2004, selling for 30 pence with a first print run of 500. Now it is 85 pence and its print run is round about 11,000. The history of the magazine has often made its own headlines. Cruickshank has faced a series of lawsuits as a result of his no-holes-barred brand of often libellous or unfounded investigative journalism. “We’re banned from the city council, Glasgow city council, we can’t phone up their press office, because again it’s an agency which is an enemy of free speech. “The state at one point withdrew our court privileges on unfounded allegations, and I eventually had to pay £6000 to right a wrong.”

    This is Cruickshank’s version of a time when his journalistic privileges were withdrawn after The Digger named and pictured the eight-year-old daughter of a Glasgow crime boss wearing a bulletproof vest in her garden. Scott’s documentary is quite critical of the Digger and its ruthless naming and shaming of local petty crooks, so I was quite surprised by his insistent defence of a man he did not seem to have much affinity with. “I did notice there was quite a lot of hearsay printed.” He eventually admitted, “The problem is you’ve got some wee guy talking about some junkie and Cruickshank’s printing something which might be a heap of lies. The issue is going to be that that person is probably not going to be in a position where they can take out a legal action against the Digger.”

    This is the kind of dilemma that the magazine regularly throws up; the practice printing the addresses of suspected paedophiles or naming police informers can get those involved badly hurt. Cruickshank does not seem to consider the implications of sharing such sensitive information as his problem. “If you own a shop that sells kitchen knives and someone buys and knife and stabs someone is the shop that is at fault?” he argues, “I don’t think so.” It occurs to me that it’s more like selling a knife to a lunatic who offers to pay in severed fingers. Scott describes the reputation the Digger has picked up amongst the criminal fraternity: “The prospect of being in the Digger frightens folk because it does get people incensed. With those small time characters the Digger can probably get away with quite a lot of naming and shaming. But not when fighting the Glasgow Housing Association (GHA) though, they’re a very powerful organisation.”

    Nevertheless Cruickshank does take on the GHA as well as the police, the council, the masons, and any other stories the mainstream press won’t touch. “That’s when stories can start to not be fully substantiated,” Cruickshank says, “The police are a secretive organisation and it’s very difficult to prove allegations of corruption within the police because, who’s going to corroborate it? Violent crime only survives if its being aided and abetted by so called law-abiding citizens. “The police must be made properly accountable, the government could investigate the police but they don’t — the only way that is going to happen is if the mainstream media start investigating the police but they won’t do it either.”

    He admits that it’s almost impossible to substantiate some stories to the standard of the mainstream press, but Cruickshank is agitated by my suggestion of a vigilante like edge to his editorial policy. “It’s not vigilantism, it’s genuine investigative journalism that the Scottish press have stopped doing.” Whether you agree or not, if none of the mainstream papers want, or are legally able, to pursue such scandals within the authorities, is there no justification to continue under the radar? With Cruickshank’s casual gossip of communists, corruption and conspiracy, I feel like I’m beginning to understand his worldview: his Digger-ish outlook. As my sense of the good and the true seems to have gained the upper hand Scott throws a curveball, showing the situation in a different light.

    “The Digger works from a grassroots level which the newspapers don’t speak from. It taps into a popular myth or misconception that there is this huge conspiracy going on. The readership wonder how these big time crime lords are getting away with it and Cruickshank says because they’re in cahoots with the police. They wonder how the GHA are running ruffshod over the tennants and he will explain it’s because it’s run by gangsters. They wonder: “Why are we so fucking poor? Why do we not get public services? Because there’s this big conspiracy keeping us in poverty,” and that can placate them to a certain extent. “I thought at first the Digger was going to be very right wing but it isn’t. It covers stories of racial abuse sexual abuse, minority issues, issues to do with the corruption that he sees in the council, the police and the HHA especially. It’s a big deal, the GHA, because a lot of the readership are in that environment.” I wonder how my attitude to the Digger has been affected as a distanced, broadsheet reading, wannabe journalist who just wants to see codes of practice upheld and standards met in the media; whether it prevents me from seeing the real value the Digger has to its target readership.

    “The Digger is a thorn in the side of the establishment,” Cruickshank sums up cheerily. By all accounts, this allegation is well founded.

  • SOURCE

    		•
    CORPORATE JOURNALISTS COME FROM WEALTH AND ELITIST HENCE THE DISTORTIONS

    media2 Journalists of future 'to come from richest 25pc'

    A new report on social mobility has confirmed that the traditional career ladder of regional press journalists moving onto the nationals has all but ceased to exist. The "Unleashing Aspiration" report on access to the professions published today predicts that unless action is taken, the journalists of the future will be drawn from the richest 25pc of families in the UK. Among the reports's findings were that while journalists and broadcasters born in 1958 typically grew up in families with income around 5.5pc above the national average, those born in 1970 grew up in families with incomes 42.4pc above the average.

    "Typical journalists of the future will today be growing up in a family that is better off than three in four of all families in the UK," it said. The report, by a panel of experts chaired by the former Cabinet minister Alan Milburn, also provided the first official confirmation that the old career route from local to national papers has broken down. "During the UK's first wave of social mobility, journalists might have worked their way up through local newspapers...such opportunities have diminished in recent decades," it said.

    Interviewed on the BBC Today Programme, Mr Milburn said that "in the old days, it was possible to start out as a messenger boy on a local paper and become a Fleet Street journalist." Nowadays, he said, it was almost impossible to enter the profession without a university degree. The National Union of Journalists has welcomed the report's call for national standards for internships as a means of tackling what it called "bogus work experience placements."

    The report showed how the cost of such internships, as well as the debt acquired when undertaking journalism courses, present a barrier for those from less well-off backgrounds to enter journalism. The NUJ has been campaigning for a number of years for the government to tackle the use of placements by media companies to get work done for free. General secretary Jeremy Dear said: "This report shows how the use of unpaid internships has undermined the diversity of our profession. It is good to see the government recognising the problem and we are now looking for swift action to ensure the financial barriers to entering journalism are lowered."

  • SOURCE

    		•
    HOW HOLLYWOOD SPREADS DISINFORMATION ABOUT SECRET SOCIETIES

    national treasure

    During the last years, a new trend appeared in Hollywood: secret societies being at the center of movie intrigues. Some might find this surprising since secret societies are supposed to be…well…secret. Many people in the movie industry are part of those Brotherhoods so what is the reasoning behind this? We’ll look at the myth Hollywood is trying to create by examining “National Treasure” and “Angels and Demons”.

    A decade ago, movies about Freemasonry or the Illuminati were rare and far apart (see here a nice list of Masonic references in movies). There has however been a major switch during the last decade. The world wide public has witnessed major blockbuster movies featuring those Brotherhoods at the center of the story. Their exoteric symbols are abundantly displayed and some of their history is even explained. Why are those societies exposing themselves to the average movie goers, who, for the most part aren’t even aware of their existence? Isn’t secrecy an important requisite for the survival of those orders?

    I believe an important change is taking place in the communication strategies of these elite societies. The advent of the digital age, where any individual can create and publish content has rendered the secrecy of such organizations impossible. Self-published websites, books, documentaries, DVDs and other medias have exposed many secrets of Masonry and other orders. Information which could only be found in rare and exclusive books is now a Google search away. I have encountered some Masons who were astonished by the level of knowledge possessed by the ”profane”. Those types of Masonic scholars, who aren’t actually initiated into the Brotherhood, were very rare not too long ago.

    Since the digital switch is irreversible (and completed), occult orders have adapted their strategy to this new context (they’ve probably saw this coming years ago). The strategy is : “If they have to know about us, we’ll tell them what to know“. Through Hollywood and best-selling books, secret societies are being introduced to the average Joe but with one BIG condition: the public is given a distorted, caricatured and romantic portrayal of secret societies. We are introducing in pop culture a mythical lore around secret societies, associating them with fascinating symbols, treasures hunts and exotic adventures. The viewers believe they are actually learning facts about Freemasonry or the Illuminati and they leave the movies with a sense of wonder, fascination and admiration. Those feelings are however based on totally erroneous facts, dubious explanations and fairy tale story telling. After viewing those movies, the viewer has a positive predisposition concerning those orders and will be less inclined to believe and research conspiracies related to them.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Masonic references in cinema

    		•
    PHONE TAPPING NEWS OF THE WORLD v TOMMY SHERIDAN

    tommy sheridan The British media have been expert at undermining democracy by failing to promote ANY OTHER political party that is not part of the big three. Recently their activities have included phone tapping that was being carried out by the News of the World. Apparently a common practice by the media mafia who are ultimately responsible for ONLY promoting political parties sanctioned, controlled and funded by masons .

    However it is more than coincidence that a case against the News of the World by Tommy Sheridan, the former leader of the Scottish Socialist party, ended in Tommy winning his case . A rare occasion when a Scottish citizen had a CIVIL jury, but like so many victims of Scottish justice, despite initially having a lawyer had to finish the case on his own. A ground breaking win against the massive odds stacked up against the ordinary citizen in a tyrannical court structure operating primarily for the few self appointed elite mafia that run Scotland for the British establishment and the corrupt British crown. However the case against Tommy backfired and he has since been accused and charged with perjury.

    This week saw him and his wife facing a CROWN attack, that despite winning damages against the News of the World, the Scottish judiciary issued orders for the masonic run cops to charge Tommy with perjury and the case this week was heard in court where both Tommy and his wife pleaded NOT guilty. We have to ask, have the News of the World been getting prepared for this groundbreaking court action by holding up its hands that, YES on occasions they do "in the public interest" tap phones and that will allow them to use evidence gathered from Tommy's phone to be used to prove he had been committing perjury?

    Knowing, the to close a connection between Britain's judiciary and a corporate media that bend over backwards to promote their despicable conduct and hide the many victims who have been destroyed by a UK judiciary, we just wonder if this has ALL been done to pre-empt the ongoing court action?

  • Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan and wife Gail deny perjury charges
  • News of the World phone hacking: CPS to undertake urgent review of evidence
  • Newspaper spying and their Surveillance Methods
  • Private detectives and the media
  • Media mafia and political mafia now in open conflict
  • There's trouble when the spin doctor becomes part of the story
  • Phone 'blagging' methods exposed

    		•
    FLEET STREET OVERSEEN BY THE LEGAL MAFIA

    fleetst.jpg Is it any wonder the UK public are becoming ever more sceptical about the corporate media as they are so far removed from the alternative news and bloggers on the internet? If you look at the location of Fleet Street in London were most of the lying devious scumbag press are controlled from, you can see directly below is the Temple Church .

    Fleet street also runs onto the Strand and the Royal Courts of Justice. The only reason the legal mafia in the UK have been getting away with utter murder is that their media lawyers that operate within and around Fleet Street have been massively suppressing journalism in the UK and worldwide by the use of arcane laws that are NOT providing freedom of speech, only curtailing speech unless it is uttered from the mouths of the pompous ,ruthless and criminally corrupt legal fraternity.

    The power in the British Crown is in the use of masonic controlled judges and lawyers to deviously steal the assets of the unsuspecting public while totally controlling the corporate media who only report from the perspective of a crooked judge, lawyer or Chief Constable. Seldom if ever do they report either criminal or civil cases from the perspective of the victims of their crimes.

    Think of the worst crooks that operate in the UK and then compare what they steal with the vast plundering of a corrupt crown and its lackeys who have been expert at suppressing what the true objective of the British press is. That is to provide the propaganda that ignores the complete lack of trial by jury in civil cases where most of the plundering takes place.

    We have seen the recent exposures of the crooked bankers , then the crooked political mafia but these have all MASKED the real criminals that control the UK, the legal mafia who while controlling most of the written published word have been aided and abetted by a complicit media who have turned a blind eye to the daily destruction of the men and women who have been fleeced and destroyed in these utter dens of iniquity. The only way they have been able to do so has been the massive suppression of ALL news reporting until the birth of the internet. The widening gap between the real TRUTH and the corporate media shows they remain complicit and under the control of the thugs who masquerade in their robes and regalia while propping up the richest dynasty across the globe. Seldom if ever do they leave a paper trail of the vast estates and business's that have fallen under the control of these mobsters who make all other criminals pale, by the degree to which billions can be transferred into their hands at the stroke of a masonic judges pen.

    This is how the British establishment have been able to continue the class system thanks to the fraud and corruption the British crown heads and the many victims who were incarcerated in psychiatric wards when they dared to fight back . Also the lives lost when the vast legal bills have pushed vulnerable individuals over the edge in the ruthless way these global money merchants operate. The victims are uniting and now have platforms to truly tell the truth of what has been going on that has been hidden for far to long.

  • More on the legal mafia here
  • How Britain's libel laws are threatening free speech
  • Blanket secrecy that surrounds family courts is invitation to bad practice.
  • UK government’s extraordinary judicial harassment of journalist Sally Murrer
  • Prince and future king Billy made a barrister at Middle Temple the ancient Inns of Court
  • The Inner Temple heads the New World Order's legal mafia
  • Inner Temple's Pegasus Trust forges links between lawyers around the world

    		•
    CORPORATE MEDIA SPYING AND SMEARING

    media spies We have been exposing the sinister connection between the British media based in Fleet Street and lawyers operating from the Inns of courts at Temple church and also with Freemasons hall and MI5 and MI6. The latest revelations that they ALSO use private investigators to criminally search mobile phone messages and no doubt many other dodgy surveillance techniques that ex masonic cops who move into the private dick industry would have EXPERT knowledge of.

    The British corporate media is owned and run by high level masons who use that media to SMEAR and destroy anyone who dares challenge the thugs that rule the UK by force. They use subtle and devious psychological techniques that British judges and lawyers are expert at manufacturing to put untold pressure on men caught up in sinister court actions. It is them through their media lawyers that create the disinformation and distortions that HIDE this massive injustice that the British crown ultimately is responsible for. The British establishment protected for so long by their media friends are struggling to hide the complicity of a system of news reporting that looks totally out of sync with the alternative news on the internet and what bloggers are saying.

  • News of the World phone hacking: CPS to undertake urgent review of evidence
  • Newspaper spying and their Surveillance Methods
  • Private detectives and the media
  • Media mafia and political mafia now in open conflict
  • There's trouble when the spin doctor becomes part of the story
  • Phone 'blagging' methods exposed

    		•
    MASONIC COPS AND JUDGES COVER UP MURDOCH NEWSPAPER PHONE TAPPING VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    SIMON HUGHES MP ON MURDOCH NEWSPAPERS PHONE HACKING VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    MURDOCH GROUP IN HACKING AND SPYING PROBE

    murdoch Rupert Murdoch's News Group paid £1m in court costs after its journalists were accused of involvement in phone tapping to get stories, it has been claimed.

    The Guardian says three cases were settled out of court after journalists allegedly hired private investigators who obtained the information illegally. The paper claims the News Group paid £700,000 in damages and costs to Gordon Taylor, Professional Footballers chief.

    News International told the paper the case "means nothing to anyone here". A spokesman said: "This particular case means nothing to anyone here, and I've talked to all the people who would be involved." The BBC has yet to receive a response from News International.

    Mobile phone messages

    Other high-profile figures allegedly targeted include model Elle Macpherson, former deputy prime minister John Prescott and the publicist Max Clifford. The News of the World editor at the time, Andy Coulson, said: "I have made it clear to the Guardian that I knew nothing about the Taylor settlement." Mr Coulson, now the Conservative Party communications director, declined to comment further.

    The Guardian says evidence alleging journalists used investigators to hack into the mobile phone messages of numerous public figures was presented in High Court proceedings. It claims the investigators went in search of information such as bank statements and tax records. Mr Prescott told Channel Four News he had not been told his phone may have been tapped.

    He said: "I find it staggering that there can be a list known to the police of people who have had their phone tapped; I'm named as one of them. For such an act not to be reported to him reflected very badly on the police "and I want to know their answer," he went on. The Metropolitan Police declined to respond to Mr Prescott's comment.

    Two years ago, the News of the World's royal reporter Clive Goodman was jailed after pleading guilty to hacking into the phone messages of royal staff. A private investigator was also jailed and Mr Coulson resigned. The Guardian now says it has evidence of repeated involvement by the group's journalists in illegal activity, which could open the way for police inquiries and legal action by the victims.

  • SOURCE
  • Murdoch papers paid £1m to gag phone-hacking victims

    		•
    WHAT'S MTV UP TO RUNNING ADS LIKE THIS? VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    DAILY AND SUNDAY EXPRESS PROMOTES KNIGHTS TEMPLAR NEWS

    express

    The Daily and Sunday Express's main offices are on Fleet Street . Notice their banner at the top of their papers is a Knights Templar as the Express is the mouthpiece and controlled by lawyers based around the corner at Temple bar , Inner temple and the surrounding area. An area that crawls with the legal leeches who ensure the corporate media all say the same thing at the same time to protect the mass fleecing of the unsuspecting public in courts across the UK and worldwide.

    Bar association lawyers worldwide all answer to Inner Temple power and how media lawyers are used to control much of the printed word and media across the globe.

  • DAILY EXPRESS MAIN PAGE

    		•
    WHY ARE THE CORPORATE MEDIA ATTACKING MP'S SO VENOMOUSLY?

    media mafia All of the British media without a doubt are owned and controlled by rich toffs. There isn't one tabloid, TV or radio station that behind the scenes some establishment type isn't pulling the strings. So WHY are the corporate media ON MASS attacking British MP's? Is it because of their dodgy expenses claims that they have known about yet were complicit in hiding from the public for so long ? NO

    There is method in the madness once again. The latest plans to open up the tax havens abroad suddenly put those who control the vast majority of the usual complicit media under the spotlight. The Murdochs and the Barclay Brothers and the list below contain most of the media mafia bosses who, under normal circumstances, would be falling over themselves to support the masonic run political and legal mafia that utterly control the UK with menace.

    However now that their OWN foreign tax havens, are for the very first time potentially coming under the spotlight, they are taking an alternative stance for once and by exposing dodgy MP expenses they may be deflecting the spotlight from those potentially damaging exposures.Exposures that may even topple the very government that has finally gotten round to find where they lucratively hide their money.Money gained from the UK sheeple who blindly read these newspapers in the hope of hearing some truths, instead of news outlets seen through masonic tinted glasses.

    The following list of names only one arm of the wealthy media magnets who have been duping the UK public for far to long.

    Sir Max Aitken, 2nd Baronet
    John Jacob Astor, 1st Baron Astor of Hever
    Max Aitken, 1st Baron Beaverbrook
    David and Frederick Barclay
    Conrad Black
    Gervase Beckett
    Hugh Lawson, 6th Baron Burnham
    Seymour Berry, 2nd Viscount Camrose
    William Berry, 1st Viscount Camrose
    Henry Dalziel, 1st Baron Dalziel of Kirkcaldy
    Richard Desmond
    Alfred Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Northcliffe
    Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere
    Michael Berry, Baron Hartwell
    Gomer Berry, 1st Viscount Kemsley
    Sir John Leigh, 1st Baronet
    Robert Maxwell(deceased)
    David Montgomery (newspaper executive)
    Claud Morris
    Sir Arthur Pearson, 1st Baronet
    Sir Neville Arthur Pearson, 2nd Baronet
    Leslie Plummer
    George Riddell, 1st Baron Riddell
    Harold Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Rothermere
    Esmond Harmsworth, 2nd Viscount Rothermere
    Vere Harmsworth, 3rd Viscount Rothermere
    Eddy Shah
    David Sullivan
    Charles Walter Starmer
    Brian Harold Thomson
    David Coupar Thomson
    Ray Tindle

  • MORE MASS MEDIA SCAMS

    		•
    GREEDY LAWYERS,AUTHORITIAN MINISTERS AND COPS THREATEN PRESS FREEDOM

    HYDRA THE MASS MEDIA RUNNING SCARED BLAMING EVERYONE BUT THEMSELVES IN THEIR COMPLICITY IN COVERING UP A MASONIC AGENDA AND THE CRIMINALITY OF THE UK'S MASONIC LAWYERS,JUDGES, POLITICIANS AND COPS.

    The many-headed serpent that threatens freedom of the press. Greedy lawyers, 'authoritarian' ministers and hostile police officers are strangling a free press. The British news media has never been so restricted, beset by the laws of an "authoritarian" government, greedy lawyers and dwindling editorial budgets, according to one of the industry's most important representative bodies.

    The Society of Editors has submitted a dossier of evidence to Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, claiming that "meritorious" articles by local newspapers are increasingly being suppressed because of the danger that legal action would bring ruinous costs. The dossier also contains examples of published stories exposing the behaviour of MPs, local authority leaders, owners of professional football and rugby clubs, business leaders and television personalities, which have been settled out of court for financial and not legal reasons, in order to avoid the danger of being bankrupted by the fees of the claimant's solicitors.

    Speaking to The Independent on the Society's tenth anniversary, Robin Esser, executive managing editor of the Daily Mail, calls for a concerted effort to ensure that the concept of freedom of expression comes to be regarded as a constitutional right in Britain, as it is in America. He says the current threats to a free press are comparable to a many-headed serpent. "It's a bit like the hydra, every time you cut off one head two more appear ... we've got enormous issues at the moment."

    Esser, a former editor of The Sunday Express who is chairman of the society's parliamentary and legal committee, criticises the police for abusing the Protection against Harassment Act 1997 (originally introduced to deter stalkers) and anti-terrorist legislation, in order to hamper the work of journalists. "Situations occur on a fairly regular basis of photographers being prevented from taking pictures in public places, being arrested and having their film taken away or inspected." He complains of "the increasing authoritarianism of the present government which sometimes without realising it, and sometimes realising it, introduces measures which impinge further on the media's rights and duty to ensure open democracy and open justice".

    Last week the prominent barrister Ken Macdonald, QC, suggested that the recent growth of privacy legislation was strangling the freedom of the press. "We would pay a very high price indeed for underscoring the marketability of film stars and footballers," he said.

    According to Esser, who has worked in Fleet Street for more than 40 years and reported on the first landings on the moon, "I think we are more restricted now than we've ever been before". The Society of Editors, which represents both newspapers and broadcasters, is concerned that the media, already weakened by the impact on editorial resources of falling advertising revenues, is being further cowed by the danger of incurring huge costs from libel actions brought by solicitors under "no win, no fee" conditional fee agreements (CFAs), which allow successful lawyers to double their charges. The issue is being investigated under a Litigation Costs Review being conducted for Mr Straw by Lord Justice Jackson.

    The society has submitted to both the judge and Mr Straw a dossier which indicates that the local and regional media, in particular, has become terrified of the prospect of finding itself in court. Cases cited include a light-hearted piece on a local MP's views on expenses, which he complained about, leading to an out-of-court payment of £10,000 plus a bill for £26,000 in costs. Another local paper piece containing comments from a contestant on the BBC show Dragons' Den, who complained he had not been given the financial support promised by the dragons on screen, led to a settlement of £13,000 plus a further £7,000 paid in costs, despite the editor being advised that the piece was probably protected by the libel defence of "fair comment". A daily paper in the North of England paid out £10,000 (plus £7,000 costs) and made a full apology to a professional rugby league player for the local team who it had criticised after he was suspended for foul play by the league disciplinary committee. The settlement was in spite of legal advice that a defence of fair comment had "a high prospect of success".

    A Welsh paper which featured a report by a conservation trust criticising plans to develop a building and land once occupied by the poet Dylan Thomas, provoked a writ from the property developer. On being advised of the potential costs under a CFA – where London solicitors can charge £390 an hour and then double the sum with a 100 per cent uplift or "success fee" if they win – the paper caved in, paying £10,000 in damages to the property developer and still incurring £16,000 in costs. The threat of a case brought under a CFA is often enough to ensure a story is withheld altogether. The dossier cites an investigation by a regional Sunday newspaper into a money-making cult, which was not published after the editor was warned that an action would be brought using CFA.

    "In the light of this threat, the editor felt obliged to give the undertaking demanded, not because of any concerns about the quality of the journalism, the accuracy of the story, or the public interest, but purely because he feared that an adverse costs order may cause the newspaper to cease publishing," said the dossier. The report also cites the suppression of a story about an offshore company bidding to take control of the local football club. The paper had sought to expose the fact that the company had a subsidiary which had been criticised by business regulators in several EU countries but the article was dropped following a threat of an injunction and libel action.

    Tony Jaffa, of Exeter-based solicitors Foot Anstey, who compiled the dossier, says large London law firms have become adept at exploiting the use of CFAs, which were originally introduced to increase public access to justice. He confirms: "The issue of CFAs has become an important tactical weapon in the litigation process." Esser is adamant there has been a "chilling effect" on local papers and their willingness to investigate. "They will settle or they won't print a story which exposes hypocrisy or double dealing or disgraceful behaviour on the part of public servants, and that is a terrible loss." The society continues to lobby ministers and their shadow counterparts to remove what it sees as unnecessary shackles on the media. It was exasperated by a backlash against new plans to allow journalists into Family Courts, with judges and officials seeking to maintain a ban on reporting. "It's madness," says Esser. "What newspaper has got people to send along to sit in court and not be able to write a story?"

    He is hopeful, though, that progress is finally being made in introducing television cameras into courtrooms. "We feel that will help open justice and bring instant pictures to the public, just as the people in the public gallery can see what goes on. The judges fear some sort of OJ Simpson effect but that really isn't going to happen." Though proud of the society's achievements over the difficult past decade, Esser knows that the hydra that threatens freedom of the press is far from slain. "There will be two more heads tomorrow," he says. "We have to remain vigilant."

  • SOURCE

    		•
    HOW THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT USE THE MEDIA FOR MASS PSYCH WARFARE

    they live How The British Use The Media for Mass Psychological Warfare
    by L. Wolfe
    Printed in The American Almanac, May 5, 1997.

    ``I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television.... You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images....'' --Hal Becker, media ``expert'' and management consultant, the Futures Group, in an interview in 1981 [1]

    In the 15 years since Becker's comment, Americans have become even more ``wired'' into a mass media network that now includes computer and video games, as well as the Internet--an all-surrounding network whose power is so pervasive that it is almost taken for granted. As the standup comic said, ``We are really a media conscious people. I know a guy who was run over by a car in the street. He didn't want to go to the hospital. Instead, he dragged himself over to the nearest bar, to check out whether he made it onto the evening news. When it wasn't on, he said, `What does a guy have to do, get killed, to get on television?'|''

    In the highest circles of the British monarchy and its Club of Isles, this great power is not taken for granted. Rather, it is carefully manipulated and directed, as Becker describes from a limited standpoint, to create and mold popular opinion. In a 1991 report published by the Malthusian Club of Rome, entitled ``The First Global Revolution,'' Sir Alexander King, top adviser on science and education policy to the royal family and Prince Philip, wrote that new advances in communications technology will greatly expand the power of the media, both in the advanced and developing sectors. The media, he proclaimed, is the most powerful weapon and ``agent of change'' in the fight to establish a ``one-worldist,'' neo-Malthusian order that will transcend and obliterate the concept of the nation-state.

    ``It is certainly necessary to engage in a broad debate with the journalists and the top media executives involved to study the conditions for them to be able to define this new role,'' King wrote.

    In his project, King's Club of Rome can count on cooperation from the media cartel, which is a British asset, as documented in our report. It can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyze the impact on targetted populations. Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in turn, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live.

  • SOURCE AND MORE

    		•
    SCOTTISH TV'S NEW LOGO ILLUMINATI PYRAMID

    stv We have PLENTY of evidence to prove that Scottish TV has an EVIL masonic agenda that promotes the New World Order through its news and current affairs programs.

    Many victims of Scotlands evil legal scum who's lives have been destroyed have tried desperately to get STV to expose their crimes to no avail. STV is like ITV a law unto themselves suggesting they have investigative journalists but in fact are highly selective in what is and is NOT promoted.

    BRITISH MEDIA A FREE SELF PROMOTION TOOL FOR UK'S DESPOTIC MONARCHY VIDEO

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
    • Guaranteed only MASONIC run companies get that rubber stamp. How about all the freebies that get sent their way from companies endorsed by them?

    LAWYERS CONTROL BRITAINS CORPORATE MEDIA

    international bar association IS IT ANY WONDER BRITAINS MEDIA PUMP OUT SO MUCH LIES WHILE HIDING THE TRUTH THAT LAWYERS AND JUDGES HEAD THE ASSET STRIPPING IN BRITISH COURTS.

    PCC chairman Sir Christopher Meyer criticises media law firms

    Sir Christopher Meyer yesterday criticised a number of London media law firms, claiming they see the Press Complaints Commission as their "sworn enemy". Meyer singled out leading law firm Carter-Ruck, accusing it of using a Commons select committee hearing to lead an attack on the press industry watchdog. Meyer, the outgoing chairman of the PCC, suggested to MPs on the Commons culture, media and sport committee that Carter-Ruck had used a hearing before them earlier this month to attack his organisation.

    Gerry McCann, father of the missing child Madeleine and a Carter-Ruck client, also criticised the PCC at the same hearing. McCann gave evidence flanked by Adam Tudor, a partner at Carter-Ruck. The Formula One boss Max Mosley appeared before the committee on the same day and heavily criticised the PCC.

    "It was a classic Carter-Ruck operation," Meyer told MPs, adding that the session in which McCann give evidence to the committee had seen "a tendentious onslaught on the PCC". "There are lots of law firms in London specialising in media matters that see us as their sworn enemy, probably because we can do the job for free and can provide a degree of discretion," he added.

    Cameron Doley, managing partner with Carter-Ruck, denied that his firm had any involvement with Mosley, who he said was not a client. Doley also denied that Carter-Ruck had orchestrated an attack on the PCC through McCann, saying his views about the PCC predated the relationship with Carter-Ruck. "It is quite insulting to suggest that he's an innocent dupe, it's nonsense," Doley said.

  • SOURCE
    • The International Bar Association maybe the most dangerous legal group on the planet and controlled by the International law society's for their own greedy ends.
  • Media Law and Freedom of Expression

    		•
    WHY DID THE MEDIA NOT REPORT THE U.S. SENDING MASONS TO THE MOON?

    Have the worlds media conspired to hide the masonic influence over NASA moon missions? The extraordinary position were masons are boasting about Aldrin as the first mason on the moon should be significant enough for the world's media to inform the public about one aspect of NASA's selection process.

    Was Aldrin picked for his intellect or for selling his soul to the SATANIC network he was initiated into?
  • SOURCE

    • SCUMBAG BRITISH JOURNALIST CAMERON MILLAR ATTACKING THE POOR

    star We hope this scumbag of a journalist Cameron Millar of the DAILY STAR never has to endure life threatening illness like cancer.Neither his wife,children,mother or any other member of his extended family.

    He will soon find out the SCROUNGERS and SKIVERS he so viciously attacks in the article below are ,while trying to survive life threatening diseases, trying to live on the pittance that is supposed to compensate for the years of paying National Insurance to a bully boy British state.Millar is typical of the appalling British journo's hand picked to psychologically agitate the population to vent their anger on the poor and least fortunate.

    He also supports scumbag DWP minister Purnell who will likely try and use MASONIC backed private companies to do the dirty on many cancer patients, the mentally ill and disabled, BULLY BOY tactics at the extreme.

    This is typical of the vicious attacks from the MASONIC media controlled by establishment masons who while living in opulence love attacking the poor in the UK. Millar while backing scumbag Purnell forgets to mention that in 2004 he had the HIGHEST expenses claim of any MP in Manchester of over £120,000.

    We suggest Millar goes onto a NATIONAL REGISTER of the masonic scumbag press who ,while busy name calling the poor as scroungers , does bugger all to expose his masonic buddies that control Britains media and are part of the SATANIC network of abuse.

    We suggest that MILLAR will in time get his day for writing the atrocious muck he thinks is journalism . Also for the STAR to publish this disgraceful piece of drivel. While Britain has an ever increasing millionaire and billionaire population, thanks to their SATANIC affiliations, this BUM journo MILLAR attacks and bullies those least able to protect themselves.

    MILLAR YOU ARE THE UTTER SCUM OF THE EARTH WHO WILL GET YOUR DAY AS GOD HAS A FUNNY WAY OF WORKING. You go onto our top ten list of the worst journalists in the UK.

    THE OFFENDING ARTICLE BELOW

  • TIME'S UP FOR THE SCOUNGERS - FIRMS WILL FORCE 1.5M BACK TO WORK
  • Rich list blow for Gates £29.2bn

    		•
    TELEGRAPH FEARMONGERS FOR TERROR ATTACKS 5 PART VIDEO

  • PART1 FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • TELEGRAPH FEARMONGERS PART2
  • TELEGRAPH FEARMONGERS PART3
  • TELEGRAPH FEARMONGERS PART4
  • TELEGRAPH FEARMONGERS PART5

    		•
    AMERICA'S MEDIA ARE INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES

    US MEDIA 'There is no such thing , at this date of the world's history, in America as an independant press. You know it and I know it.! There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions , and if you did , you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who woud be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

    The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth: to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and the folly of this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the string and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men.

    WE ARE INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES'
    - John Swinton, Former Chief of Staff, New York Times, 1953

    BRITISH MEDIA AGENDA OF ATTACKING THE POOR

    poverty

    The above image is a selection of houses people live in around the UK.

    Which occupiers of those houses do the British fascist press continually ridicule as being greedy, feckless, self serving, arrogant, ruthless, scum , scroungers , leeches and innumerable appalling nouns that would fill a book? Also that they have been attacking them in an ever increasing frenzy?

    Not surprisingly the SCUMBAG British journalists ,editors and owners scandalously ridicule and bully those living in the derelict and impoverished dwellings.While the one living in the luxurious mansion and the myriad of properties she owns throughout the UK and overseas is treated like a goddess.

    Who actually owns and controls that media? Well , between the masonic mafia and the dodgy licences they get issued, that ensures the mass media must continually promote the richest dynasty in the world while condemning the victims of their massive corruption and fraud. That keeps her and her hangers on in the lifestyles she think she deserves while the rest of the population are forced to live in the shi_tholes of council schemes that masquerade as homes.

    Many of those who had dragged themselves out of these cesspits and into homes they BOUGHT with dodgy mortgage scams only later to find, as soon as they had been forced into the British Crown courts for ANY reason, that her judicial lackeys, would steal back those homes using ruthless masonic based legal systems that ensure SHE remains in those huge mansions while the rest of the population are returned to the ghetto's they had dragged themselves out of, by the most heinous crimes against British citizens .

    Judicial tyranny, that assures the British establishment perpetuate the vast fraud that saw their ancestors steal our land and property and continues to this day in family/civil courts across the UK. A mass media that assures this evil system carries on the destruction of thousands of NON mason families who have been fleeced of ALL their worldly possessions to ensure this appalling class system carries on its dirty tricks against the vast majority of the population.

    Also the media who conspire with the political and legal mafia in the UK use another devious ploy to justify bringing in ever more draconian laws. They pick the worst case scenario like the perverts or terrorists to bring in ever expanding laws that remove more and more of our rights and freedoms.

    WHILE THE BRITISH MEDIA AND POLITICIANS CONTINUE THE ONSLAUGHT AGAINST OUR POOREST CITIZENS.

    SHANNON MATTHEWS : BRITISH MEDIA PROMOTE MASONIC JUDICIAL CROOKS VIDEO

    Everyone should take another look at this video to see how the British media promote judges and their comments when sentencing .
    ALL OF THE BRITISH MEDIA PROMOTE THIS NONSENSE a bit like how Germany's media ALL promoted Hitler and his mob.

    QUOTE Judge McCombe
    "What they had done to Shannon was truly despicable. It must have been highly disturbing to a nine year old to be removed suddenly from her normal environment ,her school,her siblings and her friends,without knowing when if at all she will be returned."

    For any separated father or couple who have seen British judges and social workers STEAL thousands of children for their own agenda this is utterly laughable. The very actions this judge accuses Karen Matthews of carrying out is the same actions his fellow masonic judges carry out everyday in courts up and down the length and breadth of the UK. While fleecing the families assets and home. What is so utterly ridiculous is that these same EVIL judges (NOT JURIES) have undermined British justice by REFUSING to allow TRIAL BY JURY in all cases were the defendant requires , especially when it concerns children . They want secrecy in those courts to hide the wickedness and injustice of the process.

    Also a mass media that fails time and again to expose what this masonic judicial mafia are doing while PROMOTING their speeches that condemn others for the evil actions they take themselves.

  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE
  • FULL ARTICLE

    		•
    MASS MEDIA HATE THE INTERNET

    FOX NEWS While watching the film MR. BEAN'S HOLIDAY promoted by most of Britain's media there was a scene of a man being called by Rowan Atkinson who when he didn't get the answer to his question threw himself to his death from a bridge.This was one of the many FUNNY incidents in the film.

    Then we have the media blaming a YouTube clip of someone showing how to tie a hang mans knot on all the suicides at Bridgend.While Britain's mass media don't blame Atkinson's film on anyone who throws themselves off high bridges committing suicide.They however blame the YouTube clip on the suicides at Bridgend in Wales.

    The ridiculous double standards of the UK media who are being exposed as SATANIC protectors and who are threatened ,not by the risks to human life of the internet,but that they cannot stand the fact that the internet is exposing their part in the evil masonic satan worshippers,a cult controlling British citizens ,bullying and abusing everyone that crosses their path.The owners and controllers of British media head that bully boy network destroying ,through media assassination ,anyone that dares suggest what they have been up to for far to long.The internet will remain a threat to these scumbags and the agenda they protect above all else.

    How could the richest dynasty in the world survive a revolution? Thanks to the masons embedded in every area of power and none more so than the heavily controlled mass media who have failed the UK population in their complicity to cover up evil threats to the country as a whole.

    MEDIA IMPARTIALITY A MYTH
    By Uli Schmetzer

    Amid ever more aggressive criticism of our ‘democratic’ mass media the question we should ask is whether our media’s much vaunted impartiality has become blatantly partial over the last years or whether the mass media has always been the serf of particular interests, interests camouflaged as the struggle to preserve the freedom of ‘our’ democratic world.

    The answer is partly contained in the communications revolution which, for the first time in human history, has given the public, or at least those interested in a more profound analysis of events, not one but many alternative sources of information - almost instantly. This capability has raised the hue and cry that what our mainstream media report is mostly one-sided often contrived and serves almost exclusively the interests and policies of those in power and their corporate allies. The justified charge then is that the mainstream media has been turned into a propaganda machine, so blatant, so efficient that some critics complain it now resembles that of the defunct Soviet Union.

    These critics should accept the media has basically been the same for decades. The concept of an independent impartial media is an abstraction as illusionary as the concept of real democracy. But the public became increasingly conscious of the flaws once the sources of information became pluralistic.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE

    		•
    REPORTERS BLOW WHISTLE ON FOX NEWS VIDEO

    FOX News told reporter: "We'll tell you what the news is. The news is what we say it is."
    Reporters Steve Wilson and Jane Akre were first asked by FOX News and later bribed, to downplay a story they had on a cancer-causing growth hormone called Posilac. The reporters decided to blow the whistle on FOX News and filed a law suit.

    After the ordeal was over, it was discovered in the appeals court that it's actually not against the law to falsify the "News."
  • MEDIA WHORES
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    ENTIRE MASS MEDIA FUNCTIONS AS A PROPAGANDA TOOL FOR THE ELITE

    media At a time of growing public disenchantment with the major media, millions now rely on alternate sources. Many online and print ones are credible. One of the world's most relied on is not - the BBC. It's an imperial tool, as corrupted as its dominant counterparts, been around longer than all of them, now in it for profit, and it's vital that people know who BBC represents and what it delivers.

    It was close but not quite the world's first broadcaster. Other European nations claim the distinction along with KDKA Pittsburgh as the oldest US one. BBC's web site states: "The British Broadcasting Company Ltd (its original name) was formed in October 1922....and began broadcasting on November 14....By 1925 the BBC could be heard throughout most of the UK. (Its) biggest influence....was its general manager, John Reith (who) envisioned an independent British broadcaster able to educate, inform and entertain the whole nation, free from political interference and commercial pressure."

    That's what BBC says. Here's a different view from Media Lens. It's an independent "UK-based media-watch project....offer(ing) authoritative criticism" reflecting "reality" that's free from the corrupting influence of media corporations and the governments they support.

    Its creators and editors (Davids Cromwell and Edwards) ask: "Can the BBC tell the truth....when its senior managers are appointed by the government" and will be fired if they step out of line and become too critical. It notes that nothing "fundamentally changed since BBC founder Lord Reith wrote the establishment: 'They know they can trust us not to be really impartial.' " He didn't disappoint, nor have his successors like current Director-General and Chairman of the Executive Board Mark Thompson along with Michael Lyons, Chairman, BBC Trust that replaced the Board of Governors on January 1, 2007 and oversees BBC operations.

    On January 1, 1927, BBC was granted a Royal Charter, made a state-owned and funded corporation, still pretends to be quasi-autonomous, and changed its name to its present one - The British Broadcasting Corporation. Its first Charter ran for 10 years, succeeding ones were renewed for equal fixed length periods, BBC is in its ninth Charter period, and is perhaps more dominant, pervasive and corrupted than ever in an age of marketplace everything and space-age technology with which to operate.

    It's now the world's largest broadcaster, has about 28,000 UK employees and a vast number of worldwide correspondents and support staff nearly everywhere or close enough to get there for breaking news. It's government-funded from revenues UK residents pay monthly to operate their television receivers - currently around 22 US dollars, and it also has other growing income sources from its worldwide commercial operations supplementing its noncommercial ones at home.

    Most important is how BBC functions, who it serves, and Media Lens' editors explain it best and keep at it with regular updates. They argue that the entire mass media, including BBC, function as a "propaganda system for elite interests." It's especially true for topics mattering most - war and peace, "vast corporate criminality," US-UK duplicity, and "threats to the very existence of human life." They're systematically "distorted, suppressed, marginalized or ignored" in a decades-long public trust betrayal by an organization claiming "honesty, integrity (is) what the BBC stands for (and it's) free from political influence and commercial pressure."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE

    		•
    UK MEDIA PAY COPS FOR INFO ON IMPENDING ARRESTS AND INVESTIGATIONS

    police raid Chris Bryant MP comments
    "It is clear that several national newspapers pay police officers for information about impending arrests and ongoing investigations. That is clearly bribery and corruption, and it occurs regularly throughout the United Kingdom.

    I have asked several Home Secretaries about that practice—they always say that they will put a stop to it by clarifying the law on suborning a police officer, but so far none of them has done so. Is my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary who will?"
  • SOURCE

    		•
    OUTFOXED : RUPERT MURDOCH'S WAR ON JOURNALISM VIDEO

    Outfoxed examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news.

    Behind the scenes at Fox News
    This is not the film itself. Instead, it's a reel of interviews from the film. Lots to learn here.
    "The revolutionary thing that Fox has done is that it's eliminated journalism from the TV news. There is no journalism at the Fox News Channel." - Bob McChensey
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

    		•
    KIDNAP MOTHER AND REPORTING BY THE BRITISH MEDIA

    matthews It is interesting to watch the reporting of the British media on the Shannon Matthews case were her mother has been found guilty of kidnapping her. Normally the radical feminist man hating press BURY stories of any description that show a mother abusing or failing to protect their child. This group knows this goes on ALL the time but seldom sees the light of day from a British media that has a masonic agenda.

    British masonic judges rely on a steady stream of articles from a complicit mass media to justify the multi billion pound asset stripping in Britains secret family courts. These articles must ensure the attack on NON masonic men goes on continually to ensure JUDGES have the excuse to relieve men of a life time of assets and their homes, but most importantly their children.

    Usually if a woman is attacked or abused the BBC and the other tv stations follow suit trundling on women's aid and a myriad of other radical feminist groups to comment on those BAD MEN. However they are ALL noticeably quiet and also noticeable that MASS MEDIA never allow comment from credible mens groups when the role of abuser is reversed. This would not suit the masonic judges who need to ensure women are always seen in the best light while men have to be continually castigated for their masonic agenda to work successfully.

    How successful these masonic plans are can be put in this way. That more money has been stolen from good men across the UK by corrupt judges and lawyers than all the plundering by the Gestapo during the last war . The multi billion pound asset stripping by Britains masonic judges with a complicit media ensures this massive gravy train continues with ever more men destroyed by this EVIL system. One good reason why MEN should avoid British mass media news and ensure they read the alternative news media on the internet who have been exposing their part in these horrific crimes for a very long time.

    Also noticeable is the sudden GLUT of stories in that complicit mass media showing mothers failing their children . Is that anything to do with a NEW government agenda to punish women who have children and are to be forced to find work even if the child is only one year old?

  • Mother guilty over Shannon kidnap
  • Pure evil: Shannon's mum found guilty of kidnap
  • Mother said Shannon was missing ‘then headed off to buy beer’
  • Evil mother guilty over Shannon kidnap
  • Social workers 'warned of Matthews'
  • Karen Matthews conned live-in lover Meehan into thinking he'd fathered one of her 7 children
  • Shannon Matthews: A wee survivor given the chance of a new life
  • Police hunt and MEGA overtime so why did it take 24 days to find Shannon Matthews?
  • Video: Karen Matthews continues her lies during police questioning
  • Shannon 'friends' pestered McCanns for money but couple were warned off by police
  • Mother of seven portrayed as sink estate slob
  • Council orders social services probe into Matthews' family in years before kidnap
  • Seven children, six fathers : Lazy, sex-mad Karen Matthews symbolises broken Britain
  • Donovan: The oddball accomplice who had snatched a child before
  • Shannon Matthews: Mother 'unable to place children's needs above her own'
  • Scribbled notes shed light on Shannon's disturbing world
  • No explanation can excuse what happened to Shannon Matthews
  • I have seen close up how UK social workers can be seized by paralysis
  • The fantasist and the domestic drifter
  • They drugged her, hid her, then waited to claim £50,000 reward
  • Public grief and private greed of kidnap mother

    		•
    PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION AT WORK IN THE UK'S MASS MEDIA

    council house
  • Revealed: the £2.6m council house family

    • How can this EVIL government with its patsy media like "This is London" still able to endlessly attack the poor?

    First use someone as a scapegoat,like the above, for the venom that will be created when this story is published by ALL the obliging media ,especially if its a foreign national . Give the illusion that everyone gets large fancy houses in the UK police state, instead of the shitholes on council schemes.

    That creates the PROBLEM.

    Make sure the British media feed this utter GUFF to the sheeple as if it is the norm ,instead of a nasty devious plan by Purnell to instigate that PROBLEM, which will get the REACTION from the sheeple. Finally create the SOLUTION to utterly abuse everyone else who lives on the paltry sums that masquerade as some sort of benefit after maybe years of paying into a never ending money pit of tax and National Insurance.

    There are lies,damn lies and the British mass media.

    FAKE NEWS AND PROPAGANDA

    The mainstream media is dominated by a handful of mega corporations who control what many of us hear, read, and believe. The propaganda masters are censoring and suppressing the truth from the American people. There are many reporters who know the truth but dare not talk or write about it, and what some report they don't even believe themselves. Those who are courageous enough to stand up to the establishment are often ridiculed, intimidated, and blocked by editors and producers who are acting as gatekeepers to the truth.

    There have been calls for the arrests and even death of those who criticize the government. You know you have slipped into a fascist dictatorship when those who dissent are treated like traitors, terrorists, and enemies of the state. We are being brainwashed with all the propaganda that we are subjected to in our everyday lives in an effort to control our minds and shift us into massive groupthink. We are being told that we are spreading democracy around the world while our own freedoms are being systematically taken away.

    A CRISIS OF PUBLIC TRUST IN TELEVISION

    TV A series of scandals over rigged phone-in contests and manipulated documentary footage has sparked a crisis of public trust in television, two high-profile BBC figures have warned. Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman will warn of a "catastrophic loss of nerve" in the industry in tonight's flagship MacTaggart lecture.
    Paxman is expected to demand a statement of "greater purpose, or moral drive" from television executives. A source close to Paxman said: "Jeremy feels there has been a fairly catastrophic loss of nerve in trying to define any sense of purpose or ambition in TV."

    MORE HERE