• British newspaper publishers
  • Most Traffic Growth To UK News Sites Is Coming From U.S.
  • The Guardian the feminazi's friend blaming all domestic violence and online trolling on men alone (The Guardian controlled by ultra rich feminist Amelia Fawcett named one of Fortune magazine's "50 most powerful women")
  • Amelia Fawcett top feminasty controlling Guardian ouput
  • German Editor Confirms Mass Media is Controlled

    Udo Ulfkotte, a former editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (one of Germany's largest and most respected newspapers), has confirmed that he and fellow journalists are bribed and controlled by intelligence agencies. We know that intelligence agencies like the CIA, BND, MI-6 and Mossad are arms of the Masonic Jewish Illuminati banking cartel. Utflotte says he went public because the Illuminati is prepping for a war with Russia by using the media to incite hostility.

    by Udo Ulfkotte Interview transcribed with comment by Eric Zeusse Abridged by

    I've been a journalist for about 25 years, and I've been educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public. ... The German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia. This is a point of no return, and I am going to stand up and say ... it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over Europe. ...

    I am very fearful of a new war in Europe, and I don't like to have this situation again, because war is never coming from itself, there is always people who push for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. ... We have betrayed our readers, just to push for war. ... I don't want this anymore, I'm fed up with this propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where we have press freedom. ... The German media, especially, my colleagues ..., day by day, write against the Russians, [these journalists] who are in transatlantic organizations, and who are supported by the United States (CIA) to do so. ...

    I became 'honorary citizen of the state of Oklahoma,' ... Why? Because I write pro-American. I was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, the CIA. Why? Because I am pro-American. I am fed up with it; I don't want to do it anymore; and so I have just written a book, not to earn money, no, it will cause a lot of trouble for me. [I wrote it instead] to give the people in this country, Germany, in Europe, and all over the world, just a glimpse of ... what goes on behind the closed doors. ...

    Most of the journalists you see in foreign countries ... European or American journalists ..., like me in the past, are so-called non-official cover. ... Non-official cover means what? You do work for an intelligence agency, ... but ... when they [the public] find out that you are not only a journalist but a spy too, they [the CIA] will never say this was one of our guys. ... So, I have helped them in several situations, and I feel ashamed for that. ... I feel ashamed that I ... was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans, not to report exactly the truth. ... I was just imagining in my car while I was driving to this interview, I just try to work out in my brain what would have happened if I had written a pro-Russian article, in the Frankfurter Algemeine. Well, ... we were all educated to write pro-European, pro-American, but please not pro-Russian. ... But this is not what I understand for democracy, for press freedom, I am very sorry for that. ...

    Germany is still a kind of a colony of the United States, you'll see that in many points; like for example, the majority of Germany do not want to have nukes in our country, but we still have American nukes; so, we are still a kind of an American colony, and, being a colony, it is very easy to approach young journalists through (and what is very important here is) transatlantic organizations. All journalists from respected and big German newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV stations, they are all members or guests of those big transatlantic organizations, and in these transatlantic organizations you are approached to be pro-American, and ... they invite you for seeing the United States, they pay for that, they pay all your expenses and everything. So, you are bribed, you get more and more corrupt, because they make you good contacts. ... So, you make friends, you think they are your friends and cooperate with them. They ask you, 'will you do me this favor,' 'will you do me that favor,' so your brain is more and more brainwashed, through these guys. ...

    Is this only the case with German journalists? No, I think it is especially the case with British journalists, because they have a much closer relationship. It is especially the case with Israeli journalists. Of course with French journalists. ... It is the case for Australians, [with] journalists from New Zealand, from Taiwan, well, there is many countries, ... like Jordan for example. ...

    Sometimes the intelligence agencies, they come to your office, and want you to write an article. ... I just remember [for example] that the German foreign intelligence agency, the Bundesnachrichtendienst -- it is just a sister organization of the Central Intelligence Agency, see it was founded by the American intelligence agency -- ... came to my office, and they wanted me to write an article about Libya and about Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. ... They gave me all these secret informations, and they just wanted me to sign the article with my name. I did that. It was published in the Frankfurter Algemeine, ... it was about how he secretly tried to build a poison gas factory, ... it was a story that was printed worldwide days later, but I had no information on that [the CIA wrote it].

    A very good example [what happens] if you say no [to the CIA]: ... So [regarding the particular employee who said no], what happened is that he lost his job.

    Six times my house was searched, ... I have [had] three house attacks, [but] I have no children, so ... it's worse for the truth [for other journalists, whose family can be threatened, not only themselves].

    Eric Zeusse: Ulfkotte has become a turncoat. He had originally been a conservative Christian German, who opposed the increasing presence in Germany of Muslims. He then came to feel so guilty as a German having discovered as a journalist the role that a major German company played in helping Saddam Hussein to gas Kurds, [using German poison gas] but which his newspaper never published, so that Ulfkotte briefly converted to Islam. Perhaps he was dealing with the shame he felt about his not bucking his newspaper's top management by simply ignoring them and going public about what he had found, his letting it remain hidden.

    But then, he co-founded a Christian peace-movement against the Islamic extremism emerging in Germany. And now, he has come out with a book which argues that the U.S. is actually the biggest of all threats to peace. The book is available only in German, Gekaufte Journalisten, meaning "Purchased Journalists."

    Now that he has abandoned not just the anti-Islamic but the anti-Russian elements of traditional German culture, he no longer is welcomed among the conservative Germans who had helped him to build, and then, for decades, to advance, his successful long career as a 'journalist,' but which he now calls "propagandist."

    Moreover, a German poll in November 2013 showed increasing public distrust there of America's government. Since Germany is central to the Western Alliance -- and especially to the American aristocracy's control over the European Union, over the IMF, over the World Bank, and over NATO -- such a turn away from the American Government threatens the dominance of America's aristocrats (who control our Government). A breakup of America's 'Alliance' might be in the offing, if Germans continue to turn away from being just America's richest "banana republic."

  • Murdoch mafia empire: Phone hacking exposed VIDEO
    Trust In Mainstream Media News At An ALL TIME LOW! VIDEO
    Russell Brand on main stream media's 'Ignorance is a necessary ingredient for oppression' VIDEO
    The Art of Deception

    Psychopaths, psyops and COINTELPRO

    The man sitting across the table from you is known for trickery. He is a stage magician. You know he employs trickery, so he tells you he is going to do a card trick in which he can't possibly manipulate the cards. In this trick, you will do all of the card handling. He won't touch the cards at all. He instructs you to cut the deck into four piles. You do so. He then tells you that you are going to randomize the order of the cards by shuffling them around and moving cards from one pile to another. Pointing to a pile of cards, he instructs you to take the top three cards and place them at the bottom of that pile. Then, take the next three cards and place them, one each, on top of the three piles remaining on the table. You repeat the procedure with all four piles of cards. The cards should now be very well mixed.

    The man then begins his patter in earnest. He asks you to confirm the fact that he has not touched the cards. You agree. In no way could he have manipulated how you would cut the cards or handle them. Again, you agree. With a smile, he asks you to turn over the top card from each pile. You are amazed. The four aces sit at the top of each of the four piles of cards. For a moment, your mind might actually entertain the possibility that real magic has been performed, though you "know" you've been duped. The fact is, this trick can be taught in a couple of minutes to any child capable of understanding the instructions. It requires no fine motor skills for clever card handling since the performer does not even handle the deck. The only thing required is setting up the deck before the trick is performed and being able to do a little sales patter in which you get the audience to agree to a statement that is blatantly false.

    Take a moment and see if you can identify the lie that makes the trick believable. Everything the magician says is true with one exception. The trick is based completely on a facet of human psychology that most people--stage magicians, salesmen and politicians aside--don't understand. When a person is given a number of facts that are demonstrably true, they will tend to group all statements in that group together, agreeing to everything said, including an embedded lie.

    1. The magician asked you to agree that he did not touch the cards during the trick: True
    2. He asks you to agree that he did not influence you in any way in how the cards were cut: True
    3. He asks you to agree that in no way did he manipulate you in the handling of the cards: FALSE

    In fact, the only thing he did was manipulate you while creating the illusion in your mind that you were making free choices. If you don't see the manipulation yet, read through the description of the trick again. The magician did not allow you to choose how the cards would be shuffled once they were cut into four piles. Instead, he guided you through a pre-programmed series of moves--three cards to the bottom then three cards on top of the remaining piles--designed to move the four aces to the top of the four piles from their pre-placed position at the top of the deck! If you want to understand the mechanics of the trick, grab a deck of cards and try it. Just put the four aces at the top of the deck then simply follow the trick as outlined above. Once you understand how the trick is done, you'll realize it is a very cheap bit of manipulation. If you found your mind reeling at the description of the trick, you'll probably feel a bit of a fool at how easily you could be duped. The trick really is a child's game and a very old one, at that. Yet, people are still fooled by it.

    It works with more than just cards. The phrase, "stacking the deck" means using a variation of this kind of trick to predetermine the outcome of any situation by placing what is to be chosen in a particular position then guiding the chooser through a predefined set of movements that forces that particular choice while giving the illusion of free choice. Take a look at how it is done in real life.

    The most enduring form of the forced choice in the U.S. and western Europe is the electoral process. This is such an obvious forced choice that it can, rather paradoxically, remain undetected even after it is pointed out. The key is the emotional involvement of the electors, which just happens to be the key to stage magic, too. Once you've convinced someone they are making a free choice, they will provide the evidence of the freedom of their choice for you. If human beings didn't possess this peculiar bit of psychology, stage magic wouldn't work. It wouldn't matter what the magician said. The forced choice would be seen for precisely what it is: forced. Instead, a little salesmanship on the part of the performer convinces the audience of what is to come before the trick is performed. The audience then dutifully sees exactly what they were told to see and the magician is free to manipulate events to his favor.

    Here is another example of the techniques of stage magic at work. On the morning of September 11, 2001, you awoke to reports that the unthinkable had happened--a massive terrorist attack had occurred on U.S. soil. As the day unfolds, you learn the following facts. Four planes had been hijacked to be used as veritable flying bombs against high profile targets. Two of those planes, in front of thousands of witnesses and several video cameras, fly into the twin towers of the World Trade Center. Later that morning, those towers collapse, leaving not even a bit of the structures left standing. In the Pennsylvania countryside, another of the hijacked planes crashes following an apparent heroic effort by the passengers to regain control of the aircraft from its hijackers. Also, something crashes into the Pentagon, causing massive damage, a huge fire ball and loss of life.

    Eventually, it is announced that the damage at the Pentagon was caused by the fourth hijacked plane. This makes perfect sense to you. Four planes are hijacked, three are clearly accounted for, and something crashed into the Pentagon. The only logical choice is that the fourth plane crashed into the Pentagon. What doesn't occur to you is that you have been duped once again by another variation of the forced choice. Just like with the card trick, you don't think of the obvious, that the deck has been stacked and movements manipulated to force this particular choice.

    Subsequent revelations about the inconsistencies in the official story of the event only further the illusion. A magician might turn your mind away from thoughts of the cheap manipulation he has performed by giving you a false choice of explanations for what you have witnessed. He only needs to give you one of the possible explanations, letting you provide the other in the privacy of your own mind. He tells you it must have been "magic." While you know it isn't true, his suggestion has clouded your thinking by introducing noise into your thought process. After all, if you were sufficiently impressed by the trick, that very thought likely went through your head. The same thing is done in the official story of the events of the day of 911. A false choice is set up by suggesting that the alternative to the official story is something preposterous, like holograms of planes flying into the twin towers, or rogue elements of the U.S. government committing this atrocity.

    And here we see that a subtle variation of the trick, also used in stage magic, has been employed to divert your attention. You have been given two possible scenarios that contradict the official story. One of them is blatantly silly, one is not. Yet, as any stage magician, salesman or professional politician knows, your mind will group the statements together and dismiss the second with the first. In other words, the truth about the trick has been told openly, but in such a way that you will reject the truth, sending you down any number of dead-end blind alleys searching for the secret of how it was done.

    Take a moment again to review what you were told and what you actually saw with your own eyes. If you want to see how the trick is done, do not accept anything the magician tells you at face value. He is a liar. His job is to give you as much truth and openness as possible, for the purpose of proving to you that he is not manipulating events in any way, so that the critical lie that makes the trick work will go undetected by the average observer. In the case of 911, you were flooded with demonstrable facts that were horrifying, engaging your emotions to a high degree. Remember, the key to all trickery is the emotional involvement of the audience in supporting the lie. Each fact presented made the ensuing lies all the more believable.

    Two planes really did crash into the twin towers. A plane really did crash into the Pennsylvania countryside. Something really did crash into the Pentagon. All of this is a matter of record, so everything that comes after, your mind will tell you, is a matter of record, too. But it isn't.

    In fact, the evidence strongly suggests that a commercial aircraft could not have crashed into the Pentagon. There was, for example, no wreckage found at the scene that could have come from such a craft. For the craft to have hit the building as low as it did, its engines would have had to scrape the ground, yet the lawn in front of the Pentagon was left unmarked. The hole left in the Pentagon was barely as wide as the fuselage of such a craft. Assuming that the fuselage managed to fully penetrate the building and disintegrate, creating a hole that size, one is still left to account for the wings and engines. The official story would have them folding back and penetrating the building along with the fuselage. But there is simply no room for them to have made it through the hole.

    In the case of the twin towers, the claim has been made that they collapsed--as did the building 7, later--due to a loss of structural integrity caused by massive fire and a weakening of supports from the shock caused by the impact of the planes. This was accepted as a reasonable explanation, despite the fact that the buildings were designed to withstand such a shock and no steel reinforced building has ever collapsed due to fire, before or since. Also, as any publicly available video of the collapse of the towers will show you, the tops of the towers leaned to one side as they began to fall, yet still managed to right themselves and fall into the footprint of the building. This would be impossible without a controlled demolition of the buildings.

    You have also been asked to believe that each and every safeguard against such an event put in place by the U.S. military failed simultaneously on that fateful day, despite the fact that those safeguards had been called to action over 60 times in the preceding 12 months and worked perfectly each and every time. In the words of our stage magician, "it was magic!"

    Of course, in the case of stage magic, the lies are told for our amusement. No harm done, maybe even a lesson learned. In the case of a deception like 911, the stakes are a bit higher. The art of deception is as old as mankind. Strike that. It is far older. It is as old as the universe itself. Deception is a key survival strategy for nearly everything that has ever been alive. How curious, then, that we - the one species we believe capable of rational thought on the planet - remain almost completely ignorant of the various means of deception. What's even more curious is the fact that many remain steadfast in their belief that such deception is rare when the evidence contradicting that belief can be seen in even the most cursory investigation of nature.

    Chameleons change color to blend into their surroundings. Some species of moths and butterflies have markings that are so close to the bark of the trees on which they perch that you can look right at them and not notice they are there. Carnivorous plants will mimic the smell of rotting flesh in order to attract the flies they like to eat. The list goes on and on, from one link in the food chain to the next. Why do we insist that this behavior ends with mankind? The key, once again, is emotional involvement in a lie we have been told. Since the time we were children, it has been drummed into our heads. Everyone is the same inside. It's a lovely democratic sentiment, but it is a sentiment that is contradicted by evidence. Just like in stage magic, we are directed away from seeing the truth through clever means of misdirection. The belief of what we are to see is planted in our heads before we ever see it. If we begin to suspect the truth, noise is injected into our thought process and true statements are mixed with false to use our psychology against us.

    The simple fact is, all who look human are not human in the way we normally understand humanity. A small but very destructive minority of those who look human lack some of the most basic of human characteristics - empathy and conscience. These creatures use deception and misdirection to prey on human beings. If humans begin to suspect that all is not right with them, they will put a preprogrammed set of movements into play that are designed to steer you away from the truth. And, just like in the trick, everything they do is mechanical. Yet, as long as people remain unaware of their methods, their actions continue to befuddle and even amaze.

    Another real world example of how this kind of trickery is performed. As you read this, the chances are pretty good that a soldier for the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) is either using a Palestinian mother as a human shield while he terrorizes innocent people in their homes, ostensibly to search for terrorists, or is shooting a small Palestinian child in the back for the egregious crime of throwing rocks at an Israeli checkpoint in anger.

    If this were any other country, you would be outraged. But this is not any country. This country was set up with immunity from criticism before it even existed. Do you see the correlation to stage magic again? The audience is told what they will see BEFORE they see it, preparing them to look for clues that validate what they were told and ignore what doesn't fit. In the case of Israel, the audience was told that they are God's chosen people who have suffered endlessly and now deserve to have this little plot of land to call home and live in peace.

    What the audience misses is the fact that a large portion of the Jews who have made Israel their home are the descendents of converts to Judaism rather than descendents of the founders of that religion, and that they appear to be lead by some of the aforementioned almost-human predators, a.k.a., psychopaths. Even the slightest hint of criticism of Israel is met with cries of anti-Semitism, another bit of manipulation in which the only choice given is to wholeheartedly support everything Israel does or side with the Nazis. It's another bit of forced choice that is as cheap as any described here...and it is remarkably effective.

    The fact is, most Jews are caring, compassionate people who really do want to live their lives in peace. Because nearly everyone has had at least a Jewish friend or two and has observed this for themselves, charges of anti-Semitism can carry weight in their minds. Jews are not monsters, so how could these people claim they are doing anything but defending themselves against a relentless Palestinian terrorist mob that threatens their very existence? Let's look at the statements in the same way we looked at the card trick.

    1. Most Jews are caring and compassionate: True
    2. Jews deserve a home in which they can live in peace like everyone else: True
    3. Therefore, Israel is only defending itself when it imposes curfews, limits travel and even shoots small Palestinian children: FALSE

    No one deserves a home at the expense of others. The Palestinians were living peacefully in the region for thousands of years before the U.N. created the state of Israel. Even after that event, Palestinians were gracious to their new neighbors. It was not until the leaders of Israel saw fit to demolish Palestinian homes and drive a people from a land that had been theirs for thousands of years that things turned ugly. Put yourself in their position for a moment and tell me you wouldn't be just a little pissed off.

    You may think I've given three examples of trickery in the real world - voting, 911 and the assumed irreproachability of Israel. In fact, I've only given one. The best tricks have multiple levels. One deception follows another until the audience is completely lost in the trickery with no hope of unraveling the secrets. The same is true, here. There are more levels to this particular trick, far more than we could talk about now. The rabbit hole is deep with a lot of branching tunnels that lead nowhere.

    It is possible to unravel this trick, however. The key, as always, is to avoid taking any of what the magician says at face value. To see how the trick is done requires a little study and a willingness to accept that you have been tricked at all. Maintain your emotional attachment to supporting the lie and you will only fall further under the spell of the magician. Learn to open your eyes and you will suddenly see what has been going on right under you nose, undetected. One day, the trick will seem cheap and obvious and you will wonder how you didn't see it all along.

    If that day comes for you, the day your study has paid off and you can see the trickery of the magician, you will have a future.

  • Commemoration of World War One or another excuse to promote the royal parasites and their political puppets as if they CARE?
  • BBC, Britain's royal parasites and political mafia promote centenary of World War One as if they give a fuck about the peasants that died to protect their power and wealth
  • Zionist controlled American media blame game v Russia’s counter-evidence VIDEO
    What is ethical journalism ? The east or west's version VIDEO

    From our OWN experience of the BBC despite Aidan White (ethical journalism) spending a great deal of time praising the BBC when it comes to the sensitive issues of heterosexual males SELDOM do the BBC allow men to comment on the extreme feminist perspective the BBC endlessly spout that ALL men are bastards and ALL woman are saints. Except for the freemason mafia who are exempt from any form of law enforcement and getting away with murder and behind the extreme bias pumped out by the BBC and their vile royalist perspective of what is and isn't morally correct. Meanwhile they have been harbouring paedo's like Jimmy Savile within their ranks and who they protected for over 40 years.

  • The Ethical Journalism Network
  • Murdoch's News of the World 'undermined axe murder inquiry'exposing corrupt cops
    Crooked freemason cops and Murdoch spies behind murder of Daniel Morgan

    A retired detective has accused News of the World journalists of attempting "to undermine" the police investigation into an axe murder.

    Daniel Morgan, a private investigator, was killed in 1987. He was allegedly about to expose police corruption. Det Ch Supt David Cook believes links between the newspaper and ex-detectives he was investigating led to him being turned on by the tabloid. News UK, the owner of the now defunct Sunday red top, is yet to comment.

    Mr Morgan, who was originally from Llanfrechfa in Wales, was found with an axe in his head in a pub car park in south-east London. His killers have never been brought to justice. However, by 2002 when Mr Cook was tasked with heading a new investigation into the murder, two suspects were running a private investigations agency and that company worked closely with the News of the World, feeding the newspaper stories and confidential information.

    Illicit dossier

    Mr Cook made a fresh appeal on the BBC Crimewatch television programme, but within days of his appeal the officer was himself being watched. It has now emerged Greg Miskiw, then news editor at The News of the World, tasked Glen Mulcaire - another private investigator used widely by the paper - to compile an illicit personal dossier on Mr Cook. A News of the World photographer claimed it was pursuing a 'kiss-and-tell' story that David Cook was having an affair with the Crimewatch presenter Jacqui Hames. In reality, however, Ms Hames was Mr Cook's wife.

    Some of those connected with the surveillance operation have stated they were just following a tip-off which turned out to be misguided, but Mr Cook believes that the surveillance of him was for a different purpose. "They were trying to undermine me," said Mr Cook, who has now left the force. "They were trying to undermine the investigation into the murder of Daniel Morgan, it's as simple as that."

    'Sort you out'

    The former Met officer said: "I was told the News of the World were offering assistance to those suspected of the murder of Daniel Morgan. "The phrase that was told to me was that they were looking to 'sort you out'." The BBC has spoken to sources who corroborate Mr Cook's claims.

    Recalling the surveillance, he told the BBC: "Parked discreetly opposite my house was a van, so I called the Met and said, 'This is the registration number'. "Within a short time it came back: 'This van is leased to News International'.

    "I put the kids in the car and I drove out. Within seconds of pulling out a car parked down the lane pulled out and started to follow me." The Met soon received several intelligence reports that Mr Cook had been placed under surveillance by the tabloid newspaper. Furious that News of the World staff were working hand-in-hand with his murder suspects, Mr Cook demanded a meeting with the company and eventually sat down with then editor Rebekah Brooks.

    Mr Cook said: "I brought this to the attention of Rebekah Brooks. "I had the meeting, that is a fact. She chose to do nothing about it." The BBC has asked Ms Brooks what action she took when presented with evidence of the corrupt links between the News of the World and those being investigated for murdering Daniel Morgan. She has not responded.

    However Mrs Brooks told a Parliamentary Committee in 2011 her recollection was that the meeting was on a different topic. Alastair Morgan, Daniel Morgan's brother, said: "It's outrageous. The more I find out about it this case the worse it gets. "I am beyond surprised now with what's emerged. "There's a lot of questions that need to be answered." Greg Miskiw has recently been jailed for phone-hacking and could not be contacted for a comment.

  • Freemasonry the evil that binds corrupt murdering British cops
  • Trust in police 'severely shaken' by corruption
  • Masonic Met betrayed my brother: cop corruption link Stephen Lawrence and Daniel Morgan murders
  • Judge(freemason?) to probe axe murder of private detective: Notorious corruption case dates back 26 years
  • Jonathan Rees: Freemason private investigator who ran empire of tabloid corruption
  • Le Tour Yorkshire - Grand Départ 2014 just 20 secs of overhyped media lunacy VIDEO
    Inconvenient Truth: MSM mute on 'revenge attack' after covering Israeli teen tragedy VIDEO
    Murdoch mafia henchman and Cameron lackey found guilty of hacking phones VIDEO
    Gutter press MSNBC at the feminist man hating again VIDEO
    BBC admit press barons control election outcome VIDEO

    Deranged psychopaths who present a cosy front for the murdering gangsters running Britain. Barclay brothers (Daily Telegraph), Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Richard Desmond (Daily Express ), Rupert Murdoch (Ex-News of the World, The Sun and Times) and BBC's Danny Cohen
    Gutter media supports zionist Cowell pushing the femi-homo agenda VIDEO
    A united gutter press that hides a murdering perverted regime

    Deranged psychopaths who present a cosy front for the murdering gangsters running Britain. Barclay brothers (Daily Telegraph), Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Richard Desmond (Daily Express ), Rupert Murdoch (Ex-News of the World, The Sun and Times) and BBC's Danny Cohen

    Its getting to the stage where Britain's gutter press have reached such an outlandish position and the illusion of the present state of affairs in the UK that they are complicit in protecting a murderous crown regime and its army of perverts and psychopaths .

    Read any one of Britain's national newspapers, or worse watch a report by the tv licence funded BBC, and in their deranged minds they portray a country, that for many is on its knees, but you would never think that from the most malicious of headlines. They are all claiming some sort of successful transition to prosperity but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see past a very warped view of how mass murderers within the legal and political systems are either killing our people en masse or allowing their perverted and knighted lackeys to abuse our children with impunity.

    How can newspapers gloss over some of the most wicked crimes of the century and report that the economy is in some sort of healthy state when Britain's landscape has been decimated with the deaths of thousands of our people? That is to satisfy the greed of the Crown and its many offshoots who have been getting away with psychologically torturing the weakest and most vulnerable to the point of death and with millions more living from day to day in vast squalor hanging on to the meagre pittance of handouts that can be terminated at a moments notice on the behest of a murderous regime hell bent on finishing off anyone not prepared to go along with their evil fascist agenda.

    It is incomprehensible that 99.999999% of Britain's media are behind the cover up of murder and mayhem and to suggest that somehow Britain is now looking shipshape as they gaze across the landscape with their masonic tinted glasses while ignoring the rotting corpses of all those victims who have died to prop up a royalist regime and their army of murdering lackeys

    Anyone left who actually believes this nonsense and the spin generated by the media barons in their controlled gutter press that incessantly tell us everything is looking rosy are failing even the sheeple who believe their bile. Meanwhile ignoring crimes so wicked and disturbing that no one in their right mind could be convinced the UK is NOT morally bankrupt while murdering mobsters control the purse strings and the lives that continue to ebb away under this disturbing regime.

  • Extensive articles on Britain's mass murderers
  • Mass media or gutter press masonic controlled v Internet news uncontrolled
  • The TV mafia that gave twisted Max Clifford a platform to smear his victims
    Every single TV station that allowed Clifford a platform to smear his victims shows how his zionist / freemason connections gave him huge media attention allowing him to slander them and plead his innocence.

    A woman abused by Max Clifford as a 15-year-old last night demanded an apology from his celebrity backers.

    As the sex predator was jailed for eight years, she said her trauma had been worsened by the ‘many famous people’ who lined up to defend him. And she questioned why the publicist had been invited to tour TV stations after his arrest, trashing his accusers as ‘fantasists and liars’. The woman, who has given an interview to the Daily Mail under the pseudonym Cathy Johnson, spoke out after Clifford, 71, was handed a lengthy jail term that surprised even police.

    Saying Clifford’s fame and power had made him feel above the law, the judge revealed he had increased the sentence because of his arrogant behaviour during the trial – laughing and joking in front of the cameras and in court. His victims wept and hugged each other as the publicist was jailed.

    The woman he groomed and abused as a 15-year-old in 1977 told the Daily Mail they were owed an apology by ‘all those who influenced public opinion by subscribing to his “witch hunt” theory.’ She said: ‘Many famous people defended him, adding to his victims’ trauma. You know who you are and you should have the good grace to apologise.’ The woman, whose full interview appears on page six of today’s Daily Mail, added: ‘Justice has been done, I have nothing but contempt and disgust for him.’

    After his arrest in 2012, Clifford was invited on to ITV’s Daybreak, where he claimed he was the victim of a ‘witch hunt’. Then during his trial, stars including comedian Des O’Connor, actress Pauline Quirke and Sky TV sports presenter Clare Tomlinson came forward to give evidence supporting Clifford. The victim added: ‘After he was arrested, he was repeatedly allowed to go on TV and protest his innocence which made me and the other women feel incredibly intimidated.

    ‘He called us liars and “anonymous women”, when he knew who we were. I nearly backed out of the trial.’ Clifford will now swap his £3million Surrey mansion for a prison cell.

    Judge Anthony Leonard QC said he had shown ‘quite extraordinary’ contempt for the girls he sexually abused. He told Clifford the only reason his crimes had not come to light sooner was ‘your own dominant character and your position in the world of entertainment’. The judge said this ‘meant that your victims thought that you were untouchable, something that I think you too believed’. Clifford condemned for lack of remorse after mocking reporter

    As Clifford was driven off to prison, it emerged police are considering further sex assault charges against him. Twenty-three women originally came forward – with prosecutors selecting the seven strongest cases to take to trial – and several others are understood to have come forward since. Scotland Yard sources described the new allegations as ‘significant’ and said they would be taken ‘very seriously’ by police and prosecutors.

    One said: ‘The evidence which emerged during the trial gave a number of women the confidence to come forward and make new allegations against him. Now that he has gone to jail, yet more victims may contact police. ‘Clifford was clearly a prolific offender and the idea he stopped attacking girls decades ago is difficult to believe. ‘If anything, his arrogance – and the fact he kept getting away with it – are likely to have resulted in him committing more offences.’

    At Southwark Crown Court yesterday, Clifford repeatedly shook his head in the dock as he was sentenced for the eight sex attacks on four victims between 1977 and 1984. The judge said that if the offences had taken place today – since sentencing guidelines were toughened in 2003 – Clifford would have been regarded as a multiple rapist for which he would have been locked up for life. The maximum sentence for indecent assault at the time was two years.

    For Clifford’s eight offences, the judge gave him a series of sentences of 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, six months, 21 months and 15 months, some to run concurrently and some consecutively, to arrive at a total of eight years. His lawyer said he might appeal. Some of Clifford’s victims stared intently at him from public seating just a few feet from the dock as the judge addressed him in withering tones before proclaiming: ‘You may go down.’ Afterwards, one of the victims – who sparked the PR agent’s downfall by being the first to go to police – told the Daily Mail: ‘We didn’t say anything to each other – we didn’t have to. ‘We had never met before but we all share a common bond.’

    Arrogant to the end, Clifford offered no apology as his barrister, Richard Horwell QC, gave the court reasons why his sentence should be as low as possible. His ‘compassionate’ client had raised ‘millions’ of pounds for charity, he said, and elderly Clifford was no longer any threat to the public.But the judge said the ‘hypocrite’ publicist had been leading a double life for decades. He said: ‘These offences may have taken place a long time ago when inappropriate and trivial sexual misbehaviour was more likely to be tolerated or overlooked. ‘But your offending is not trivial but of a very serious nature.’ One of the victims was driven to the brink of suicide, he added.

    The judge also said he believed the accounts of six women whom Clifford was not charged over but who were prosecution supporting witnesses at his trial. Their ‘compelling evidence’ included how Clifford sexually abused a 12-year-old girl in a Jacuzzi during a family holiday in Spain in 1983. This woman and her elderly father were in court, and later hugged each other in tears.

    Clifford will begin his sentence at HMP Wandsworth, south-west London, a Category B prison built in 1851 where previous inmates have included gangland boss Ronnie Kray, train robber Ronnie Biggs and Oscar Wilde. He is likely to be moved to a more comfortable open prison relatively soon, as he is not considered a violent threat. Millionaire Clifford was also ordered to pay £55,000 towards prosecution costs within 28 days. As he arrived in the morning for his sentencing, he refused 15 times to say sorry to the victims, smirking as he declared: ‘I stand by everything I’ve said. Everything.' Silence of celebrities who were so quick to defend him

    They had happily entered the witness box to speak up for Max Clifford during his trial. But last night the disgraced publicist’s celebrity backers were not so keen on discussing him. Comedian Des O’Connor told jurors that Clifford was a man of ‘honesty and integrity’ who was ‘caring and charming’. Last night, his agent Patricia Lake-Smith said that the veteran entertainer did not want to comment.

    Former model and actress Jilly Johnson, pictured leaving Southwark Crown Court after giving evidence at the trial when she had described Clifford as ‘a very honourable man... very much a gentleman,’ also stayed silent. Her agent Sue Sammon said: ‘She doesn’t want to make any comment.’ When told that one of Clifford’s victims had spoken of her anger that so many high- profile celebrities had backed him, Miss Sammon added: ‘Jilly just said she doesn’t want to comment on this.’

    Sky Sports presenter Clare Tomlinson, who once worked as Clifford’s assistant and told the court she did not believe he was ‘capable’ of sexual bullying and ‘wasn’t the sort who would pat people on the bum,’ was equally reticent. Her spokesman Julian Sheldon said: ‘She doesn’t want to talk about this. ‘She doesn’t want to say anything on the record. This is a personal matter. It is not related to her work and she won’t be saying anything about it.’ Clifford’s high-profile clients have also deserted him.

    He previously acted as a spokesman for Simon Cowell, although the pair have not worked closely for around five years. Cowell has attended several charity functions and fundraising events organised by Clifford in recent years. However, since Clifford’s conviction, Cowell now has no further plans to work with the publicist, either personally or professionally. A friend said last night: ‘Simon has been left horrified by what’s emerged.’

    Dragons’ Den star Theo Paphitis, whose lingerie brand Boux Avenue was one of Clifford’s top luxury clients, has also severed ties with his company, Max Clifford Associates. ‘Boux Avenue gave notice of termination of their celebrity contract to MCA in late 2013,’ it said.


    Clifford's arrogance and ‘contemptuous’ behaviour during the trial against him was punished by a longer sentence. The judge referred to a bizarre piece of television footage in which Clifford wandered outside court, mid-way through the case, and stood behind Sky News reporter Tom Parmenter who was busy recording a piece to camera. Clifford mimicked the reporter’s hand gestures, in a clip that has attracted a huge audience on the internet.

    Parmenter turned around and said: ‘All right Max? We’ll carry on, shall we?’ Clifford replied: ‘Yeah, you carry on’, but did not move away. Yesterday the judge told him: ‘I have discovered that you appeared behind a reporter outside this court whilst he was making his report of your evidence and during which you mimicked his actions in a way that was designed to trivialise these events. ‘I find your behaviour to be quite extraordinary and a further indication that you show no remorse.’

    Judge Anthony Leonard QC said the ‘additional trauma’ to victims caused by Clifford’s ‘contemptuous’ attitude was something he had taken into account when deciding his sentence. Describing the ordeal of a victim who was abused from the age of 15, the judge added: ‘She has been extremely upset by your public denials before trial and the reports of your attitude during trial – laughing and shaking your head in the dock at the accusations made against you.’ Clifford also tried to make jokes while giving evidence – mostly greeted with stony looks from the jury.

    Asked about claims he boasted there was a photo of singer Diana Ross in his office because he had ‘screwed’ her, he responded: ‘There’s a picture of Frank Sinatra – are you suggesting I had sex with him as well?’ Clifford’s brand of humour extended beyond the courtroom.

    After a gruelling morning in the witness box being grilled about molesting a succession of ‘naïve’ teenage girls, he popped his head into a room full of reporters and said to two women sitting in a corner: ‘Are any of you girls free tonight?’ When nobody said anything, he left. His ribald gag about a woman’s pair of tights prompted laughter from the jury box and public gallery, leading the prosecutor to accuse him of ‘playing to the gallery’.

  • Tormented teenager who finally had her revenge on Max Clifford when she exposed predatory PR man 35 years after he abused her aged 15
  • A rare occasion when a wife divorcing will finish the job off (she will take the evil bastard Max Clifford for everything he's got)
  • Now we know why Max Clifford answered the questions as he did way back in 2012 (VIDEO)
  • MAX CLIFFORD'S LAST PHOTOCALL: Serial sex attacker PR finally behind bars as he is jailed for EIGHT YEARS
  • Bizarre footage shows Max Clifford creeping up behind TV news reporter during court (VIDEO)
  • Freemason run Britain made perverts like Max Clifford untouchable (The dark forces are losing their grip)(VIDEO)
  • Max Clifford for once the evil bastard keeps his big mouth shut (Shocked into silence by the verdict of his guilt)(VIDEO)
  • Max Clifford admits to covering up abuse(VIDEO)
  • Max Clifford paedo procurer for the rich and famous(VIDEO)
  • Max Clifford was paedo ‘ringmaster’ behind ‘legendary sex parties’
  • Max Clifford brags about all his jewish connections to young UJIA (United Jewish Israel Appeal) group in 2003
  • Max Clifford: From assistant on the Eagle comic to Britain's best-known PR mogul(2013 sunk due to unhealthy appetite for perverted acts against youngsters)
  • Zionist Cowell drops zionist Clifford after after he was found guilty of a string of indecent assaults
  • Now we know why Max Clifford answered the questions as he did way back in 2012 VIDEO

  • Freemason run Britain made perverts like Max Clifford untouchable
    (The dark forces are losing their grip)(VIDEO)
  • Bizarre footage shows Max Clifford creeping up behind TV news reporter during court VIDEO
    Freemason run Britain made perverts like Max Clifford untouchable VIDEO

    Max Clifford for once the evil bastard keeps his big mouth shut VIDEO

    Shocked into silence by the verdict of his guilt
    Max Clifford admits to covering up abuse VIDEO
    Max Clifford paedo procurer for the rich and famous VIDEO
    Max Clifford brags about all his jewish connections (2003)
    Max Clifford exclusive boosts young UJIA (United Jewish Israel Appeal) group in 2003

    Publicist Max Clifford took a night off from leaking headline-making stories to confess to a young UJIA committee that the secrets of his success were “confidence and the ability to lie with conviction.” The PR guru began his career as a journalist, before moving into public relations in the 1960s, promoting bands including the Beatles.

    “John Lennon was the heart and soul of the Beatles,” he recounted. “Paul McCartney was a very talented musician, but he was very precious. “Back then, my business was all about promotion,” he added, “but now it’s all about protection.”

    Saying he told clients that “I need to know more about you than your wife, mistress and gay lover,” he observed: “Stars aren’t logical,” citing the example of when Hugh Grant “went off with a hooker.” “I’ve created false identities for two major American stars I’ve represented for years because they are gay.” Asked whether his job was ever unsatisfactory, he said: “It can sometimes be incredibly frustrating, when you get so close to showing people up, and then you can’t. I knew about John Major and Edwina Currie many, many years ago.”

    Discussing some of his revelations — such as lifting the lid on David Mellor’s relationship with Antonia de Sancha, and scoops on Jeffrey Archer — he said: “When it comes to major political scandals, virtually every one of the tip-offs comes from the person in question’s best friend.” Mr Clifford has worked with many Jewish stars, among them Bob Dylan — “he took himself far too seriously” — and Paul Simon. He spoke at length about his time with American magician David Copperfield, remarking: “The man has a wonderful show, but he is a total egomaniac. “If David wanted it to be Monday, his people would make it Monday… When we got Claudia Schiffer involved and they fell madly in love, it was perfect. David was totally in love with David, and Claudia was totally in love with Claudia.”

    Although he relishes the power he wields over celebrities — “it’s amazing I can get Bill Clinton to do things for me” — he likes to use it for positive purposes. For example, he has got stars from Muhammad Ali to Westlife to make hospital visits. “I’ve been part of some magical moments. They are amazingly satisfying.” Mr Clifford told the JC afterwards: “I think in a healthy democracy we should see people in power for what they really are. I don’t mean we should expect them to be perfect, because none of us are.

    “But when so many of them pretend to be something that they are not remotely, I say: ‘Let’s see them for what they really are.’ “That’s what’s wonderful about having a free press.”

  • Max Clifford paedo procurer for the rich and famous(VIDEO)
  • 'Max Clifford's abuse sent me on a 30 year spiral of drink, drugs and depression' (Another nasty pervert protected by Britain's freemason cops)
  • Clifford like Savile believed he was 'untouchable' (thanks to his zionist / freemason connections)
  • Hypocritical UK gutter media attack North Korean propaganda that's just like their own royalist bullshit VIDEO

    It's just like the bullshit they pump out to the sheeple about the British Royal parasites
    Al Jazeera showing its extreme feminist agenda VIDEO

    We have been aware for some time of the man hating rhetoric
    coming from many female presenters on this supposed unbiased news outlet
    "House of Cards": Media Mask Masonic Control
    In western society, personal success depends on your complicity in a diabolical conspiracy and your willingness to betray your fellow citizens. But the mass media doesn't want you to know this.

    "We have already contrived to possess the minds of the goy communities...[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses." (Protocols of Zion, 12)
    by Henry Makow Ph.D.

    I devoured the second season of House of Cards like a box of chocolates. I was surprised to learn that the main character, Francis Underwood, played by Kevin Spacey, is a Freemason. What? You didn't see that?

    Neither did I. That's my point. Most congress critters belong to this satanic secret society, but you can watch a series pretending to unveil Washington politics, and not hear the word "Freemason" mentioned once. (The second season also avoids any mention of Jews and Zionist influence.) Actually there is one Masonic reference, the upside down flag in the series logo is a Masonic sign of distress, perhaps a wink to people in the know. Search "How Many congressmen are Freemasons?" on Google and you'll find practically no information. Just a story about the Congressional stenographer who broke down last October blurted about Freemasons and the devil controlling Congress There's no reminder of the 2004 Bush-Kerry election where both men confessed to being members of the Masonic Skull and Bones, but couldn't talk about it because "it's a secret."

    How gullible can people get? Both Presidential candidates belong to a secret society. Nothing happening here. Move along folks. The watchdogs of freedom, the mass media, didn't even pull on their leash. (Another deception in House of Cards is the idea that the msm actually pursues the truth.) The pioneer on the subject of Masonic control is James Wardner in a 1996 book entitled Unholy Alliances. Here are 10 facts about their control of Congress and the Judiciary in the recent past. You can be sure that things have only gotten worse.

    1. Wardner lists names of 75 congressmen who were Freemasons in the 1980's but there were probably many more. These included both liberals and rednecks: Bob Dole, Jesse Helms, Mark Hatfield, Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Byrd and Arlen Specter. Presidents who were Freemasons: George Washington. James Monroe. Andrew Jackson, James Polk. James Buchanan. Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley. Theodore Roosevelt, Howard Taft, Warren Harding, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, LBJ, Gerald Ford, G.H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

    2. In 1987, Freemason and Senator Alan Simpson (left) bragged that "Forty one members of the Federal Judiciary are presently Masons." (67)

    3. Masonic authority Henry Clausen boasted in the early 90's that Masons include "14 Presidents and 18 Vice-Presidents of the United States, a majority of the justices of the United States Supreme Court, of the Governors of the States, of the members of the Senate, and a large percentage of Congressmen. Five Chief Justices of the United States were Masons and two were Grand Masters." (67) Wardner adds that these two Grand Masters were John Marshall and Earl Warren who effectively ended prayer in schools.

    4. This is nothing new since Thaddeus Stevens, Pennsylvania's delegate to the 1830 Anti Masonic Convention noted that "though but one hundred thousand of these people of the United States are Freemasons, yet almost all the office of high profit and high honor are filled with gentlemen of that institution."

    5. Freemasons in Dwight Eisenhower's Cabinet included the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Commerce and Ike's Chief of Staff, Sherman Adams.

    6. Apart from President Truman himself,left, Masons include the Secretary of State, Commerce, Defense, Attorney General and his four Supreme Court appointments. Truman said, "Although I hold the highest civil honor in the world, I have always regarded my rank and title as a past grand Master (of the Grand Lodge of Missouri) as the highest honor that has ever comes to me." (61-63)

    7. FDR was an ardent Scottish Rite Mason. Masons in his Cabinet included the Vice President, the Secretary of the Treasury, War, Commerce, Attorney General and six of his eight Supreme Court appointments. No surprise that Empire State Mason boasted in Feb 1953 that if "World Masonry ever comes into being, historians will give much credit to when FDR was President."

    8. President Warren Harding (1921-1923) was a Mason and by 1923, 300 of the 435 members of the US House of Representatives (69%) and 30 of the 48 Senators (63%) were Freemasons. In 1929, 67% of Congress were Masons. (p. 56)

    9. Leon de Poncins wrote that the First World War was contrived to create a Masonic Super State in the form of the League of Nations. The Treaty of Versailles deliberately led to revolutionary unrest in Germany, the Civil War in Spain and finally to the Second World War. "It is a frightening thought that an occult organization ...can direct the course of European politics, without anyone being aware of the fact." (p.55)

    10. In 1834, a report to the Massachusetts Legislature concluded that Freemasonry was "a distinct independent government within our own government, and beyond the control of the laws of the land by means of its secrecy and the oaths and regulations which its subjects are bound to obey." (p.54)

    Wardner concludes that the tentacles of the Masonic lodge pervade society. There are at least 160 different organizations that require its members to be Masons, including higher ranks of the US military.(p.70) In 1950, Masons estimated that nearly 10 million adults were directly linked to Freemasonry through the nation's three million Master Masons.


    Clearly, Freemasonry (Cabalism, Satanism) is the secret religion of the West. This is the real party and we're not invited. We have to make do with an ersatz version of democracy, freedom and culture. No wonder vapid white men with pinched pussy faces run the country; no wonder people are so artificial and false and we have constant scandal, corruption and war. Clearly, the whole Gentile establishment is complicit in the subversion of humanity. Anti-Semitism is a diversion. How many of the Internet anti-Semites every mention Freemasonry? Of course the Jewish leadership is also guilty. Almost all leadership is. How much easier for Freemasons to slough off the blame on ordinary Jews who are just as clueless as ordinary Gentiles.

    Clueless because they watch House of Cards and think it actually depicts political reality.

  • Proof the gutter press and TV concentrate all their efforts on a limited number of political parties

    Only those endorsed by the establishment that keeps every other party out of the race

    Nigel Farage won a significant victory on Monday with media watchdog Ofcom's decision to rank Ukip as a major party deserving of equal broadcast status with the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats before the European elections.

    The move affords Farage's party more coverage in that campaign and boosts his argument that he deserves to be included in television debates with the three main party leaders in the runup to the 2015 general election. David Cameron is anxious to avoid this outcome, which would give extra exposure and credibility to Farage, but Ukip called on the broadcasters to reflect on the "new patterns of support" for political parties when devising their coverage in general. Although the ruling relates only to May's European contest, Ofcom also said it would keep Ukip's status "under review" with regard to the 2015 general election and reconsider the matter this autumn if there were reason to do so. The regulator made the decision after taking account of growing public support for Ukip in England and Wales, where it is now polling about 20% or more in opinion surveys about the European elections. The decision does not apply to Scotland, where Ukip does not have much support.

    The decision means all commercial channels will have to give a fair share of editorial coverage to Farage's party in news and current affairs programmes before the European vote, while ITV and Channel 5 will have to show at least two election broadcasts. The BBC follows its own guidelines but Ofcom's backing still hands Ukip a rare taste of official recognition. In past elections, it has been given one broadcast in recognition of the number of candidates it has fielded, so the ruling will increase its exposure. However, the real political significance will be in the knock-on impact on the general election, giving Farage a platform to argue that he should be included in television debates and given equal coverage in May next year. ITV and Sky News have said Ofcom's advice is likely to be a factor when they decide whether Farage should be included in any leaders' general election debates.

    Farage has already taken up a challenge from he Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, to debate the issue of Britain's membership of the EU in the runup to May. Clegg has said he is "not fussed" if Farage joins him, Ed Miliband and Cameron for televised debates, which took place for the first time before the last election. However, Cameron is anxious to avoid giving a platform to Farage's eurosceptic party, which is considered a major threat to the Conservatives' chances.

    Ukip's director of communications, Patrick O'Flynn, said the decision was a "fairly obvious one given the success of Ukip over the past few years". "We hope that all broadcast outlets will reflect on the fact that patterns of support in British politics are changing very quickly and that more and more people are supporting and voting for Ukip," he said. "It makes no sense for patterns of coverage to be based on patterns of electoral support that pertained four years ago. Ukip is a major player in British politics now."

  • Gutter press used photo of 'murder by cop' Mark Duggan at daughter’s funeral cropped to paint him a gangster

    The Mark Duggan photograph used by most of the GUTTER press – which supposedly shows him as a hard-faced gangster – was actually cropped from a photograph taken of him mourning his dead daughter. The following photograph was used regularly by tabloids like the Daily Express and the Daily Mail to accompany their articles painting Mark Duggan as a tough gangster.

    But what the tabloids didn’t tell you is that Mark’s grim expression in the photograph is because at the time it was taken he was at his daughter’s funeral. Here’s the uncropped version:

    That’s not a ‘tough-guy’ expression on his face. It’s grief.

  • UK journalists call for free press in Egypt (As if the UK media isn't already controlled) VIDEO
    Gutter press barons malicious and deliberate demonization of the poorest peasants VIDEO
    ONLY People That Get Killed By Marijuana Are Because Of COPS! CUT HIS MIC! CUT IT!" VIDEO
    The Guardian' Editors Destroying Computers Containing Snowden NSA Files VIDEO
    D-notice system to be reviewed in wake of Edward Snowden revelations
    Inquiry into future of system that warns media not to publish stories leads to fears that compliance may become compulsory

    Officials are planning to review the historic D-notice system, which warns the media not to publish intelligence that might damage security, in the wake of the Guardian's stories about mass surveillance by the security services based on leaks from the US whistleblower Edward Snowden. Sources said Jon Thompson, the permanent secretary of the Ministry of Defence, was setting up an inquiry into the future of the committee, raising fears that the voluntary censorship system also known as the DA-notice could be made compulsory.

    The committee is supposed to be consulted when news organisations are considering publishing material relating to secret intelligence or the military. It is staffed by senior civil servants and media representatives, who give advice on the publication of sensitive stories. The MoD declined to say why the future of the committee was being considered, but minutes of its latest meeting say: "The events of the last few months had undoubtedly raised questions in some minds about the system's future usefulness."

    In his latest report, its secretary, Air Vice-Marshal Andrew Vallance, raised concerns about the parallel publication of Snowden's revelations by newspapers around the world, noting that at the outset the Guardian had "avoided engaging with the DA-notice system before publishing the first tranche of information". However, giving evidence to MPs in December, Alan Rusbridger, the editor of the Guardian, said the D-notice committee had found nothing published by the paper that put British lives at risk. He said the Guardian had consulted government officials and intelligence agencies – including the FBI, GCHQ, the White House and the Cabinet Office – on more than 100 occasions before the publication of stories. On only one occasion was there no consultation with the UK government before publication, when the editor feared an injunction could be sought, he said.

    Compliance with D-notices is not compulsory, but there are fears the system could become more draconian after a review. Simon Bucks, associate editor at Sky News and the D-notice committee's media vice-chairman, told the Sunday Times: "Any suggestion that the current system be abolished would potentially be a precursor of a coercive system, which I believe the entire British media would oppose." A spokesman for the MoD said the department was "considering a review of the system", but no decisions had been made. There are currently five standing D-notices relating to military operations, nuclear weapons, ciphers and secure communications, sensitive installations and the security services.

  • Mass Media or Gutter Press masonic controlled v Internet news uncontrolled
    gutter press WHY oh WHY is there a MASSIVE disparity between what the scumbag press barons spout and what you can read right across the internet? The mass media has been controlled from the beginning, right from the start of publishing books to the present day printing presses churning out the enormous pile of SHIT that masquerades as some sort of NEWS.

    Its hard to believe that a few media lawyers / freemason lackeys have been able to control the printing presses for so long, as anyone NOT abiding by their NWO agenda would have been quickly shut down using a myriad of tools such as bankruptcy, libel or tax evasion charges. They have been able to censor every other media outlet in this way for so long they had forgotten that technological advances have come on much faster than their ability to manufacture dodgy laws that can block resistance to the murdering mafia that has been and remains getting away with murder for far to long.

    The gutter press are determined to push their MASTERS NWO agenda by more extreme reporting that continues to smear heterosexual men not part of their satanic cult while pushing a feminist / homosexual agenda in direct contradiction to the eternal laws of nature by trying to remove men as the head of their homes. Younger men unaware of this agenda to weaken ALL men not part of this sinister plot need to learn the ropes so that they can protect their future estates from decimation by forces that can ONLY grow stronger through the asset stripping taking place in divorce courts right across the world whose main intention is to weaken the men that can put a stop to this diabolical agenda with all its inherent repercussions for future generations.

  • The poison of inequality was behind last summer's riots
  • A list of the press scums top ten
    Ever Notice How Television "Journalists" Have A BLOODLUST VIDEO
    Daniel Ellsberg Explains Why Edward Snowden asked To Join Freedom Of The Press Foundation VIDEO
    Britain's press barons failures in response to NSA spying VIDEO
    Mainstream Media's Vilification Of Edward Snowden And Glenn Greenwald VIDEO
    Most UK media concertedly ignore Snowden revelations, under govt pressure' VIDEO
    The Big Cover Up VIDEO
    CNN think they are spokespersons for the American people when it comes to spying VIDEO
    The Daily Rat owner Harmsworth's New York socialite calendar from 2005
    'the royal arse kissing' HARMSWORTH

    rothermere shops

    Buying priceless art using his vast inherited wealth

    rothermere con

  • Full nauseating article here


    Rotheremere and Hitler
    Old Rothermere's hero Hitler

    rothermere black shirts

    The Rothermere's also supported the Fascist Black shirts
    and Oswald Mosely's British Union of Fascists
    What percentage of articles do the media rats have to dedicate to royalist stories?

    Barclay brothers (Daily Telegraph), Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Richard Desmond (Daily Express and Star ), Rupert Murdoch (Ex-News of the World, The Sun and Times) and BBC's Danny Cohen

    All the gutter press in Britain are licenced but very few fully understand what licencing really creates, a lapdog media with no teeth.

    A licence is given only if the press mafia abide by the rules laid down by the ruling elite and ensure that little or NO dissent is shown towards the royal parasites and their freemason henchmen or that licence will be withdrawn. They also use their legal henchmen to raise outrageous legal actions against any rag that dares to criticise the ruling mafia and why so much lies and propaganda are generated by the gutter press to ensure they fully abide by the licencing for fear of being shut down.

    They ALL bow to the royal mafia with trivia being produced en masse to fulfill their commitment to turn these vile parasites into some sort of superstars when their only claim to fame is being descendants of murdering thieving despots. At the last count old Lizzie 'owned' one sixth of the world's land mass or at least controls that land after her forefathers raped and pillaged to steal it from the natives who previously had access to all areas before maps and legal scams were instigated using their twisted laws and courts to help themselves. They are still doing the same thing today as many who have been kicked onto the street know after they thought they had BOUGHT a home. Their compliant media have been expert at protecting that form of theft the biggest terrorist threat to men right across the planet.

    So the few press barons in the UK spend all their time manufacturing shite to create some sort of godly persona for the brats of murdering despots and to conceal their real intent . Even today dissenting victims are disappearing silently into psychiatric gulags never to be heard of again and how they silently murder anyone that gives these evil bastards a hard time and for daring to stand up to a tyranny so vast , so evil and so all consuming via freemasonry no one truly knows the extent these evil bastards are having on all our lives. But we know there are victims every day finding out the true cost of this system when they are are left homeless and destitute thanks to HER judicial mafia and the vast plundering of estates hiding behind manufactured terrorists threats that suggest they themselves are protecting us all from the BAD guys when it is the royalist state rendering machine that is the much bigger concern.