HER MAJESTY 5

PHIL THE GEEK GETS DISTRACTED AGAIN!!!!!!! EVEN AT 90
PHIL THE GEEK
ARE THE FUTURE KING AND QUEEN CRYPTO JEWS
What's the chance of running into two Jews at Buckingham Palace and discovering that they are the King and Queen of England? Farfetched you say. Some curious emerging facts suggest that it could happen.

When the Royal Wedding uniting Kate Middleton and Prince William was announced, genealogy sleuths got to work. At first, the buzz indicated that Kate's mother, Carole Goldsmith (maiden name), had Jewish ancestry. If Carole Goldsmith were Jewish then, according to Jewish law, her daughter Kate Middleton would be considered Jewish -- and could become the first Jewish Queen (Consort) of England.

But alas, investigators still believing that there was a Jewish heritage in Kate's lineage found that the last five generations of her family were married in churches. Of course, that doesn't rule out that some may have been secret Jews, which was true for many Jews during the Inquisition. Other sources still suspect Jewish lineage for Kate. And according to an Orthodox Sephardic Rabbi in Israel, both parents of Kate's mother . So the question of Jew or not a Jew for Kate is still open. But wait, the plot thickens. Could Princess Diana, William's mother, have been Jewish? One source maintains that Princess Diana's mother, Frances Shand Kydd, was Jewish -- born Frances Ruth Burke Roche, a Rothschild.

If factual, that would be sufficient for Princess Diana to be certified Jewish, as well as her son, William, the future King of England. Another investigation of ancestry details a strong Davidic connection for Frances and her descendents Other intriguing bits of "evidence" and speculation have been cited in the London Daily Mail, which quotes sources that claim that Diana was conceived during her mother's affair with the Jewish banker tycoon Sir James Goldsmith (originally Goldschmidt and no apparent relationship to Carole Goldsmith). The report says that Frances was estranged from her husband, Earl Spencer (Viscount Althorp), and had an affair with Sir James Goldsmith just at the time that Diana was conceived. Strengthening the case, a report points to striking resemblances between Princess Diana and Sir James Goldsmith's other three children, Zak, Ben and Jemima Goldsmith.

If these tidings are true then Diana would be thoroughly Jewish with a Jewish mother (Frances Ruth Burke Roche aka Rothschild) and a Jewish father (Sir James Goldsmith). In turn William, the future King of England, would have deep Jewish roots.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • New royals in cash for access fears over California's £3m social event of the decade
  • Kate Middleton: Jewish or not?
  • Will the Future King of England Be Jewish?
  • Davidic Ancestry of Prince William and Prince Harry
  • Were Diana and Jemima sisters?
  • William & Kate: The Big Cover-up
  • William and Kate will smash glass at wedding
  • The "Jewish" Conspiracy is British Imperialism
  • England's Jewish Aristocracy
  • PRINCE WILLIAM SHOWING ALL THE DRESS SENSE OF A FUTURE DESPOT
    william despot

    HIS MOTHER WOULD BE TURNING IN HER GRAVE AS TO HOW HER SON HAS TAKEN ON THE ROLE OF THE NEXT ROYAL DESPOT WITH ALL THEIR FANCY ROBES AND REGALIA MASKING A SINISTER RULING ELITIST CONTROL NETWORK (MASONIC)

  • Antichrist 2012—Will Prince William of the British Royal Family Become the Prophesied Antichrist? (AUDIO)
  • HOW DID WE GET FROM HERE TO THIS BLOODY DEFERENTIAL TYRANNY?


    Are we freer NOW under despotic rule and the expected deference to their massive wealth and power or during the neanderthal era?
    BRITISH ROYALS DRESS CODE PERPETUATING VILE CLASS AND DEFERENCE
    ROYAL NEWLYWEDS CALLED PARASITES BY QUEBEC POLITICIAN
    satanic black nobility wedding Quebec politician Amir Khadir is not pleased the royal newlyweds will be visiting Montreal and Quebec City during their upcoming 9-day Canadian tour.

    Khadir, who is a member of Quebec's national assembly (MNA) and co-leader of Quebec Solidaire, referred to the royals as "parasites" in an interview with the Journal de Québec newspaper. "What a waste of public money. All this to welcome those parasites," Khadir is quoted as saying in the article. A portion of the trip's cost will be covered by Quebec taxpayers.

    Khadir also told the newspaper that he doesn't mind laying out the red carpet for visitors with extraordinary ideas who have done remarkable things, but he finds it insulting to do so for those with royal blood. Prince William and his wife Kate chose Canada for their first international tour as a married couple. The pair will kick off their Canadian visit in Ottawa, landing on June 30, before heading to Montreal and Quebec City on July 2 and 3. Protests are already being organized by sovereignty group Réseau de résistance du Québécois (RRQ) to greet the royals in Quebec City.

    "The Canadian people and the Quebecer people will pay for that [tour] and we strongly disagree with that," said RRQ spokesperson Julien Gaudreau. Another group, Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste, is also planning peaceful demonstrations. Khadir told the Journal de Québec he is not ruling out joining protesters on the streets. In April, Quebec's International Relations Minister Monique Gagnon-Tremblay announced Quebec would pay a portion of the costs of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's visit, although the amount was yet to be determined. When Prince Charles visited Montreal in 2009, it cost Quebec taxpayers $25,000.

    ADQ leader Gérald Deltell was quick to denounce Khadir's comments Tuesday, saying the remarks are "a great dishonour for us." Deltell said guests need to be treated with respect, regardless of any personal feelings about the role of the monarchy in Canada. "You have to respect the tradition when you receive someone who is coming to your country," Deltell said.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • THE ONLY TIME THE QUEEN CRIED IN PUBLIC
    royal yahct tears


    WHAT IS UTTERLY LAUGHABLE IS THAT SHE COULD BUY THE BIGGEST LUXURY LINER IN THE WORLD A MILLION TIMES OVER BUT DOESN'T BECAUSE SHE EXPECTS TO HAVE EVERYTHING SUBSIDIZED BY STATE HANDOUTS. CROCODILE TEARS ONLY FOR AN INANIMATE OBJECT SHOWS A COLD, RUTHLESS AND DESPOTIC ROYAL MAFIA.

    WHY THE ROYALS CAN NEVER FORGIVE BLAIR AND BROWN

    PRINCE Philip is not renowned as a man who keeps his own counsel but in the 14 years since the Royal Yacht Britannia was taken out of service he has stayed silent. Now, however, in a television interview to mark his 90th birthday he has criticised the decision to decommission the vessel in 1997, in a cost-cutting measure by the Labour government. Memorably it was the only time the Queen, who sailed the world on the yacht for 43 years, was seen to cry in public. Asked in the programme by Alan Titchmarsh if it was the right decision Prince Philip gives a bold “no”, saying it left him “saddened”. He adds: “She should have had her steam turbines taken out and diesel engines put in. She was as sound as a bell and she could have gone on for another 50 years.” The interview is due to be screened later this month. It is a remarkable comment by the Duke of Edinburgh, which shows how the loss of Britannia still rankles.

    The thought of hordes of tourists triptrapping over the teak decks of the Royal Yacht Britannia is said to be enough to bring a furrow to his brow. For more than 40 years since her launch in 1953 she was the flagship of the Royal Family, providing a refuge on the High Seas, and a symbol of the nation’s pride. The Queen and Prince Philip chose the interior fabrics. Many of the world’s most influential people, including several US Presidents, Boris Yeltsin, Winston Churchill and Nelson Mandela, were welcomed aboard. Today she is moored next to a large shopping mall at Leith, in Edinburgh, where she has become a major tourist draw, giving 300,000 visitors every year a glimpse into a privileged lifestyle. Prince Philip's controversial remark may help explain why neither Tony Blair nor Gordon Brown, his chancellor at the time Britannia was retired, received invitations to the recent wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. By contrast, both their Conservative predecessors, Sir John Major and Baroness Thatcher, were on the guest list. Revenge, as the saying goes, is a dish best served cold. By convention the Royal family does not interfere in politics and, even after such a long gap, the Duke of Edinburgh is straying into dangerous territory by openly criticising a decision taken by a previous government.

    Of course he has form for putting his foot in it but it is highly unlikely that he had no forewarning of Titchmarsh’s question about the Royal Yacht and may even have invited it. It’s also unthinkable that the Queen was not involved so Philip is, effectively, speaking for the entire family. Back in the Nineties the Conservative government had proposed replacing Britannia with a new yacht at a cost of £60million but Labour scrapped the plan to the fury of Prince Philip and Prince Charles. Refurbishing her, the option favoured by Prince Philip, would have cost £17million but that was also rejected. At the time, however, the royals had been rocked by several scandals, including the break-up of the marriages of Charles and Prince Andrew. Extravagant spending on apparent frivolities such as royal yachts and trains was coming under intense scrutiny. There had also been outrage over plans to use taxpayers’ money for repairs to Windsor Castle after it was ravaged by fire in 1992. Supporters of the yacht argued that she worked hard for Britain and was not simply a floating playground. The Queen once said of the yacht, which carried the Royal Family on 968 official voyages: “Britannia is the one place I can truly relax.”

    Royal author Phil Dampier says: “I am surprised that Prince Philip has spoken out but the fact he has done so after all these years shows just how much it still annoys him. He couldn’t say anything at the time because the standing of the Royal Family was so low but times change and it does now look like a very short-sighted decision. The cost of refurbishing Britannia would have been peanuts, really. “The yacht gave the nation tremendous prestige and much smaller royal families in countries such as Denmark still have a royal yacht. “Britannia was comfortable and intimate but by no means luxurious. Philip had his own driftwood collection on board, while the shelves in the dining room were lined with gifts they received from visitors. Every year they’d sail to the north of Scotland and it was a family tradition that they would moor at the port of Scrabster and be greeted by the Queen Mother, who had a residence at the nearby Castle of Mey in Caithness. “Many of the crew served on Britannia for years. Philip, who was a former naval officer, especially loved Britannia and it held so many happy memories for both him and the Queen.”

    In one of the vessel’s final roles after the handover of Hong Kong back to China in July 1997, the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh and the former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten and his family left the colony on board Britannia. She was the 83rd royal yacht since the restoration of King Charles II in 1660 and the second to be called Britannia. Britannia was decommissioned at a ceremony in Portsmouth before suffering the indignity, in Philip’s eyes, of becoming a floating museum. Now, anyone with sufficient funds can hire Britannia as a party venue. Prince Charles, who shares his father’s fondness for the yacht, once wrote about the impending loss of Britannia: “There was a kind of exasperated sadness experienced by all and sundry.” He also noted that American officials did not understand the decision to decommission the vessel, which he describes as “the dear yacht”. Proposals to fund a replacement with private money came to nothing. The Queen was said to be appalled at such a suggestion, fearing she would be forced to sail around with “something ghastly” painted on the funnel, such as a corporate logo.

    Former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond says: “On one occasion I was on board for a function and the Queen offered to show me round the engine room. She was immensely proud. “They were both very much involved in the fitting out of the yacht and it was a home from home, somewhere they could take refuge when they were abroad. I remember the decommissioning well. The Queen was in tears and there’s no doubt she was upset. “It was going to cost millions to refurbish but I always wonder if Britannia could have been saved for the Royal Family if the Queen had offered to put up, say, £5million. There might have been public support then, I think.” Ironically, Philip’s intervention comes as Britannia is due to have her first makeover since being taken away from the Royal Family, albeit costing £100,000 not £17million. Following the wedding of William and Kate, high regard for the royals is now well and truly restored. It’s been suggested that Prince Philip is cannily sowing the seed that there could be no better present to his wife from the nation for her Diamond Jubilee next year than a new royal yacht. Maybe Britannia will again, one day, rule the waves.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • ELIZABETH 2 GO RIPPLE EFFECT VIDEO
    BRITISH CROWN: THE EVIL POWER BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER VIDEO

    The Crown is the private City State of London. It has a council of 12 members who rule the corporation under a mayor called the Lord Mayor. The Lord Mayor and his 12-member council serve as proxies or representatives to sit in for 13 of the world’s wealthiest, most powerful banking families…” Headed and controlled by Queen ELizabeth and the rest of HER despotic family and why she personally owns more land across the globe than any other despot or any on the list of the world's richest.

    Why does the world's media en masse fail to identify the Queen as the richest by far of any ultra wealthy families? All lawyers who write ALL contracts across the globe answer to bar associations who ALL answer to the Inns of court in central London who in turn are controlled by the Duke of Kent on behalf of the Queen at the UGLE United Grand Lodge of Freemasonry. The biggest global mafia by far raping and plundering the world using dodgy legal chicanery.
    THE UNLAWFUL KILLING OF PRINCESS DIANA (SNEAK PREVIEW) VIDEO

    ROYAL GANGSTERS IN TIARA'S
    prince phillip Diana movie alleges Prince Phillip is a 'Fred West-style psychopath' and labels Royal Family 'gangsters in tiaras'

    The Royal Family masterminded the car crash that caused Princess Diana’s death as a ‘warning’ to make her toe the line, a controversial new film premiered at Cannes yesterday claims. The director, Keith Allen, said the House of Windsor had ‘got away with murder’ because no one had been held to account over the accident.

    In the film, entitled Unlawful Killing, Prince Phillip is branded a 'Fred West-style psychopath' who 'orchestrated the murder' of Diana. The Queen is dismissed as a 'gangster in a tiara'.

    Allen, who is trying to sell the film around the world, was bankrolled by Mohamed Al-Fayed, whose son Dodi also died in the car crash, to make the movie. He invested £2.5 million to back the production after it was turned down by every broadcaster in the UK. It will not be shown in UK cinemas because of strict laws on libel and contempt, but Allen believes the movie will make money in America.

    Allen said: ‘I think Diana was in a position to rock a lot of boats. I think [the accident] was supposed to be a warning. ‘I believe there was a chance that she could have survived the accident. But I think the situation may have gone too far.' In the film, the inquest in to her death is presented as a cover-up in which different arms of the British establishment - including the police, the Courts, and the Royal Family - as well as the French coroner and government had a hand.

    queen drinking Unlawful Killing opens with a details of a letter penned by Diana to her Butler, in which she claims that Prince Charles is planning to have her murdered in a car accident. The production stated the 36-year-old could have been saved had she been taken to hospital quickly - and that the inquest failed to properly investigate why she wasn’t. The film shows the graphic black and white close-up of Diana taken moments after the Mercedes carrying the couple crashed in a Paris underpass, for a few seconds.

    The image, in which her blonde hair and features clearly visible, has never been publicly seen in this UK. Allen said: ‘The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock. It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.’

    The film features Al-Fayed accusing the Royal Family of being racist. Allen, who authors the documentary, suggests in it that the Establishment was unhappy with Diana’s relationship with Dodi, because he was a Muslim. It also claims that her role in the anti-landmine campaign put her at risk from those in the arms industry, and those in power who had links to it.

    Psychologist Oliver James is interviewed about his behaviour for the film - and despite having never treated the Duke of Edinburgh, he claims he displays classic ‘psychopath’ behaviour, likening him to a 'Fred West'. In another bizarre sequence the House of Windsor is compared to the mafia, and Allen describes one picture of the Queen, Princess Margaret and Princess Anne all dressed in black as ‘gangsters in tiaras’. The controversial premiere was met with ridicule from critics with many questioning how editorially independent the film could be when it was funded by Al-Fayed.

    Writer Martyn Gregory, who penned Diana: The Last Days the last days, branded the the film ‘ludicrous’ and claimed that Allen had simply made a vehicle for Al-Fayed’s rants. Critic Richard Friedman compared the ideas put forward in the film as like Mel Gibson in Conspiracy Theory. He said: ‘It is misleading not to let the audience know that Al-Fayed is funding this film.’

    Unlawful Killing features interviews with Piers Morgan, Lauren Booth, and Tony Benn. Allen enlisted the help of freelance journalist Richard Wiseman, who went undercover to monitor how the press covered the tribunal. However the only insight he gained was that the BBC’s Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell fell asleep during some of it.

    The comedian said that he made the film to highlight the failings in the way he believed the death of Diana was investigated. News of his documentary had been met with disgust with many close to Diana.

    Close friend Rosa Monckton said: ‘The fact people are trying to make money – which is all that they are doing now – out of her death is quite frankly ... words fail me.’ A spokesman for St James’s Palace declined to comment.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • THREE MASONS UNITE AT BLACK NOBILITY WEDDING
    royal masons
    ROYAL PROTECTION A MULTI-BILLION POUND RACKET FOR THEIR THUG COPS
    The British Royal parasites not only cost the UK billions but their security is overtime heaven for the many masonic cops who leech off this massive abuse of public moneys and trust . Despite the endless propaganda by their compliant media the sheeple need to waken up to the lies and deceit as to how the Royal mafia are surviving using their well paid henchmen to impose massive abuses on a deluded population.

    Beatrice and Eugenie are stripped of their 24-hour protection after row over £500k annual cost

    Prince Andrew’s daughters are to be stripped of their 24-hour police protection after a growing row over the £500,000 annual cost. Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are the biggest losers of a Scotland Yard review of security for the Royal Family. The princesses, fifth and sixth in line to the throne, will be given protection only when they attend official events on behalf of the Royal Family.

    Prince Andrew had fought ferociously for the protection officers to stay. He argued his daughters should be treated differently from other minor royals because they enjoy HRH status. But his argument failed because their cousin Zara Phillips, the daughter of Princess Anne, has no protection – even though she has a higher public profile. Andrew’s wish that his daughters follow him into public life has also been thwarted.

    The Queen has made it clear that she expects the princesses to pursue their own careers after university, rather than go on the Civil List as working members of the Royal Family. The decision will please Prince Charles who has been exasperated by the embarrassment caused by his younger brother’s controversial activities as UK trade ambassador. Charles has long believed that the Royal Family has to be leaner and more cost effective – even though his own spending (£16million last year) is lavish by comparison to the famously thrifty Queen.

    The controversy over the protection officers for Andrew’s daughters has been rumbling for years. The princesses have not helped their cause by being photographed falling out of expensive London nightclubs in the early hours, often the worse for wear, with protection officers in tow. The cost of guarding Eugenie, 21, in her first year at Newcastle University has been estimated at £250,000 a year. It includes salaries, accommodation and living and travel expenses of two full-time bodyguards.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • ROYAL MAFIA: A FRONT FOR ROTHSCHILD
    Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschilds ("Crown")

    By Alcuin Bramerton (for henrymakow.com) (from July 27,2010)

    It is accurate to posit that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are not independent, sovereign countries. However, these nations are not owned and run by the UK; they are owned and run by the House of Windsor Crown Temple syndicate within the City of London Corporation. The head signatory of the Crown Temple syndicate is Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England). It should not be forgotten that the most powerful financial syndicate in the Western World is that of the European Rothschilds.

    The Rothschilds, because of their power base inside the City of London Corporation, have a controlling membership of the London Crown Temple syndicate, and they also have executive control of the Vatican and the Mafia though the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy. The financial affairs of the new UK coalition government in London are also Rothschild-controlled. The line management here is understood to be Jacob Rothschild > Nathaniel Rothschild (N.M.Rothschild & Sons Limited, New Court, St Swithin's Lane, London EC4P 4DU) > Oliver Letwin > George Osborne (British Chancellor of the Exchequer). Queen Elizabeth II fronts for the Rothschilds. She is the largest landowner on Earth. She is Head of State of the United Kingdom and of thirty one other states and territories, and is the legal owner of 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the Earth's land surface. A conservative estimate of the value of the Crown Temple syndicate's land holding, under the Queen's signature, is £17.6 trillion.

    The Queen's syndicate land holdings are based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in each of those countries. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on Earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on Earth with 1,900 million acres, Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres, and the UK with 60 million acres. Elizabeth Windsor and her covert syndicate in London are the world's largest landowners by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen's land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres.

    The 4th largest landowner on Earth is often said to be the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land area of the USA, 760 million acres. However, this Washington DC private corporation Federal Estate is actually owned and controlled by the London Crown Temple syndicate. Indeed, at the present time, the London syndicate in partnership with an old family Chinese syndicate, hold, and have activated, a $47 trillion World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve Board. The five largest "personal" landowners on Earth, at present, are Queen Elizabeth II of England (6,600 million acres), King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (553 million acres), King Bhumibol of Thailand (126 million acres), King Mohammed IV of Morocco (113 million acres) and Sultan Quaboos of Oman (76 million acres). In reality, however, these named individuals are just the head signatories of old bloodline syndicates which act corporately through hidden family trusts.

    More historical and current background about Elizabeth Windsor (Queen Elizabeth II of England) compiled in links below.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Royal Mafia 1
  • Royal Mafia 2
  • PRINCE WILLIAM AND THE RULING MAFIA'S BIGGEST FEARS VIDEO
    WHAT WAS YESTERDAYS SHOW OF STRENGTH BY THE ROYAL MAFIA ALL ABOUT?
    queen godmother London was in lock down yesterday to ensure NOTHING was going to upset the satanic black nobility wedding of the year. Thousands of activists and protesters knew the ring of steel mounted by their thug cop assassins was NO MATCH for an unarmed population that has to tolerate wall to wall coverage of the most devious propaganda that has ever been manufactured across the globe.

    The New World Order is showing major cracks and the freemasons behind this facade ensured only they and their duped goons were allowed access to present to the world the Queen and her extended family and patron of the worlds freemasons as the GREAT AND THE GOOD. No one should be fooled by this show of strength, as Gaddafi and the other deposed dictators across the globe are also expert at putting on the same displays to give the impression the non believers are in the minority. They have shipped freemasons and their extended families from across the globe who were both inside and outside Westminster Abbey to ensure the manufactured facade suggests to the world EVERYTHING is fine on planet Royal.

    The complicit masonic/zionist run global media was in full swing getting right in behind this facade. Along with the many duped sheeple going along for the fairytale ride, the same as the millions who bought tickets for the Michael Jackson spectacle were there was a NO SHOW. Just because large amounts of sheeple can be gathered in the same place does 'NOT' mean that automatically condones EVIL. The New World Order is far from the sugary sweet way it is portrayed in their controlled media. A media that still manages to dupe the thicko's and Royal stalkers who believe this nonsense.

    While despots are being removed across the world this was the one event the Royals could not afford to get wrong . So their state assassins were out in force with every type of artillery they could muster. The activists who have been stripped of any means to counter the massive military machine that protects the Royals power , wealth and privilege can only look on and wonder how long it is going to take before the sheeple truly waken up to this enormous facade. The devious manipulation of the low life's who think stage managed events like the wedding ensure the continued reign of the Royal despots will continue ad infinitum.

    Their media are battling against the alternative views on the internet and why they had to generate this massive deception disguised as a Royal wedding. This was the leaders of the New World Order trying to tell us everything is fine go back to bed nothing to see here, when in fact there are major cracks appearing in their master plans, that the enslaved are NO LONGER going to tolerate this world they have built to ensure the ruling mafia continue in their opulent lifestyles. They will NEVER be able to turn back the clock to serfdom no matter what fancy spectacles they put on. THAT WE WANT TO ENSURE DOES NOT HAPPEN.
    ROYAL SHEEPLE AND THE MASONIC PILGRIMAGE VIDEO
    A FAIRYTALE WEDDING? WHAT NONSENSE
    william and kate wedding picture A RARE OCCASION WHEN THE CORPORATE MEDIA TAKE A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE BIGGEST DESPOTS ON THE PLANET. FOR THE THOUSANDS SLEEPING ROUGH IN LONDON THIS MASSIVE EXTRAVAGANCE SHOWS JUST WERE THE CROWN'S PRIORITIES LIE PROPPING UP ELITIST WEALTH, POWER AND PRIVILEGE. A SHAMEFUL SHOW OF OPULENCE WHILE VAST AREAS OF BRITAIN SUFFER UNDER THE EXTREME AUSTERE MEASURES FORCED ON THE POPULATION BY ETON GROOMED TOE RAGS LIKE DAVID CAMERON.

    NEVER A SHORTAGE OF MONEY WHEN PROPPING UP THE BRITISH ROYALS AND THEIR MASONIC HENCHMEN. WHILE THE PEASANTS STRUGGLE THE RULING ESTABLISHMENT HAVE LAVISH EVENTS THAT PROVE THE WEALTH OF A NATION IS MASSIVELY UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED. EVERY LAST ONE OF THE DELUDED ROYALISTS ATTENDING AND CELEBRATING THIS EVENT SHOULD HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME AS THEY ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE ONGOING FASCIST UK STATE DOMINATED BY A WICKED AND EVIL CONTROL NETWORK. WHILE THE REST OF THE WORLD GET RID OF THEIR DESPOTS THE LUNATICS ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM IN BRITAIN.


    The wedding of William and Kate on Friday will be a joke, a hopelessly overhyped celebration of an absurdly undemocratic system, writes SPIEGEL. He pities the bride for her imminent loss of freedom, and wonders why this eccentric nation continues to worship the Windsors.

    The whole thing feels like an aberration of history.

    It's wrong if the head of state of a country can only come from one family. It's wrong to furnish this clan with palaces, land and all manner of grants to spare its members the indignity of having to earn their keep and enable them to live in luxury. It is wrong to address the Windsors and, from next Friday the delightful Kate Middleton as well, as Your Royal Highness or even Your Majesty. It is wrong to see them as anything other than people made of flesh and blood, like you and I. Millions of Britons know that. The Guardian newspaper wants to abolish the monarchy, as does the Independent and the Economist magazine. Many professors, film directors, writers, actors and politicians would like Britain to become a republic -- but they remain in the minority which for years has been constant at around 18 percent of the population.

    Cherie Blair, the difficult wife of the former Prime Minister Tony, once refused to curtsey in front of the old Mrs. Elizabeth Windsor, but the majority of Britons enjoy doing that, and much more, for Queen and Country. The Windsors are Europe's most expensive royal family, but the people go on paying, without grumbling, at least as long as Queen Elizabeth remains alive.

    The Queen Owns all the Swans, Whales and Sturgeons

    But Great Britain is a strange country. It has no written constitution but a rigid class system. The lawyers wear wigs in court and there are no citizens, just subjects. By law, all swans, all whales and all sturgeons are the property of the Queen, but there's no British national football team. And if the Queen wishes to award an honor to one of her subjects, he can proudly call himself "Officer" or even "Commander of the Order of the British Empire." What on earth do these titles actually refer to? Much in this realm seems at least as antiquated as the London Underground. British soldiers are fighting for democracy in Afghanistan and Libya, and they fought for it in Iraq. But at home, they defend the absurdly undemocratic idea that nobody but a Windsor can be head of state. As soon as Elizabeth, 85, shuffles off her mortal coil, her son Charles, 62, already worn down by his long wait for the accession, will take the throne, even though opinion polls show the majority of Britons don't want the brooding, esoteric prince to become king.

    The pomp and ceremony surrounding the marriage of William and Kate is the latest expression of British eccentricity -- but a large part of the world appears to be succumbing to it as well. Yes, the carriages of gold and velvet look pretty, the bride's train will be a sight to behold and Westminster Abbey is quite a spectacular backdrop for the ceremony. But is it really worth all the fuss? More than 10,000 journalists are descending on London. The German networks ARD, ZDF, Sat.1, RTL, n-tv and N24 will hardly be broadcasting anything else on Friday. Everyone is pretending that this spectacle is the most important and beautiful event on earth -- but it is not. Oddly, the British public isn't as interested in the wedding as one might think. Most Britons say they don't really care about the event. Only about a third of them plan to watch the show on TV. And, compared to previous royal nuptials, relatively few of them plan to take part in the traditional street parties. In the center of London, hotels have plenty of spare rooms even though they have been offering discount deals for the weekend.

    Millions of British subjects already fled the island on budget airlines before Easter and are now populating the beaches of Turkey, Cyprus, Egypt or the Caribbean. The weather there is guaranteed to be better than in London, where heavy rain is forecast for Friday. Britain is still mired in its worst economic crisis since World War II. Everyone should be rolling up their sleeves to haul the nation out of the doldrums. But the government declared the wedding day a public holiday, and schools, banks, offices and factories will be closed -- just because the heir to the heir to the throne is getting married. The extra holiday may lead to increased turnover in the nation's pubs, but it will end up costing the economy billions.

    royal asses


    A Wedding Dictated by Palace Protocol

    In truth, the marriage of William and Kate is a sad spectacle. Two young people aren't getting wed in the way they would like but how the palace, protocol and granny demand it. William, 28, is accustomed to that because he was born into it. But for Kate, 29, Friday will mark the end of her freedom. For her parents, it will be a bit like the death of their daughter. She won't belong to them anymore -- she will be elevated to some form of distant, aristocratic human being, forever unavailable for that impromptu dinner with Mum and Dad.

    Fairytale wedding? No way.

    Some friends and relatives will be present in Westminster Abbey, but most of the guests will be strangers, and some of them will be repulsive ones at that. King Mswati, the despot of the impoverished African nation of Swaziland who has 13 wives, will be flying in with his entourage of 50 people. Arab potentates have also been invited, some of whom are currently having pro-democracy demonstrators shot at in their streets. Who would want to get married in such company? Half the British cabinet is coming, along with opposition Labour leader Ed Miliband, who bears the grand official title "Leader of her Majesty's Loyal Opposition." Former conservative Prime Minister John Major will be present. But the last two Labour prime ministers, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, have not been invited. Is that their punishment for having supported the ban on fox hunting? Why should the autocratic Sultan of Brunei get invited and not the two previous leaders of a democratically elected British government? The whole world is waiting to admire Kate's wedding dress. The designer will be inundated with work after this. But the wearer of the dress faces a future that shouldn't really be desirable for an intelligent woman in the 21st century. Kate will have only three tasks from now on: serving her husband, looking good and bearing children, preferably boys. Apart from that, all she has to do is shut up.

    It's like in the 1950s -- only much worse because she will have to continue curtseying to the Queen and other higher-ranking members of the family she has married in to. The whole thing feels even worse than just an aberration of history. It's a joke.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Utterly ridiculous how the monarchy dish out meaningless titles like confetti
  • Occult Wickerman Walpurgis Wedding

  • THE ROYALS SMILING ASSASSINS
    THE MONARCHY'S RUTHLESS MASONIC MUPPETS STIFLED ALL DISSENT AT WEDDING VIDEO


    THE BRITISH COPS ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN PROTECTING THE ROYALS AND THEIR HENCHMEN AND ENSURING THEIR STAGE MANAGED EVENTS DON'T GET DISRUPTED BY ACTIVISTS DISGUSTED AT THE ABUSE OF THEIR SINISTER NETWORK OF POWER. WHILE THE PEASANTS HAVE BEEN TOTALLY DISARMED, A MASSIVE ARSENAL WAS DISPLAYED BY THE ROYAL MAFIA'S SNIPERS TO SHOW HOW THEIR POWER, WEALTH AND PRIVILEGE CAN ONLY BE PROTECTED AT THE POINT OF A GUN.
    DISARMED PEASANTS CAN ONLY WATCH AS ARSENALS COME OUT FOR ROYAL MAFIA

    CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
    ROYAL HYPE: EVERY VILE DESPOT HAS THEIR SUPPORTERS VIDEO
    WHAT THE ROYAL'S COP THUGS ARE DOING TO STOP WEDDING PROTESTS VIDEO


    FOR ANYONE WHO WONDERS HOW THE ROYALS MANAGE TO AVOID PROTESTS AT THEIR EVENTS . THIS IS HOW THE UK IS NOW BEING RUN BY A BUNCH OF THUG COPS WHOSE PRIMARY ROLE IS TO PROTECT THE ROYALS, THEIR MASONIC HENCHMEN AND THEIR MANY BOUGHT HANGERS ON.

    Protesters planning to behead effigies of Prince William, the Queen, Charles and Camilla were arrested last night and held in a south London police station during the wedding. Police seized a working guillotine as they arrested Chris Knight, 68, head of anti-royal anarchist group The Government of the Dead; his partner Camilla Power, also 68, and Patrick Macroidan, 45, dressed as an executioner, at Knight's home in Brockley.

    They were held for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and breach of the peace. They claimed they were intending to stage a street theatre event. Sources said they were expected to be released on bail at about 3pm today. In a separate development, activist Charlie Veitch was held in Cambridgeshire on behalf of the Met, on suspicion of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance and breach of the peace. The privately educated former finance worker was among activists who occupied Fortnum & Mason during last month's TUC march.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Royal thug cops arrest 55 to stop ALL protests and dissent
  • Britain's biggest security operation in a generation(to block any dissent)
  • Corporate media congratulate met thug cops for stifling dissent at wedding
  • Public nuisance offence
  • WHO'S PAYING FOR THE DODGY YOUTUBE ROYAL WEDDING PROPAGANDA ?
    youtube royal wedding

    NEVER MIND THE FACT THEY CONTROL THE TV, RADIO AND CORPORATE PRESS THEY NOW ARE BLITZING THE INTERNET AND ESPECIALLY YOUTUBE WITH THEIR DISGUSTING ROYAL PROPAGANDA ON A GRAND SCALE.
    ANCIENT TRADITION OR ANCIENT DESPOTISM?
    For anyone who still does not see a conspiracy of the media en masse should at least see how the press barons unite come a Royal mafia event. Their whole reason to live is to provide the endless propaganda that ensures the 'sheeple' are continually drip fed with trivia and drivel that in 99.9999999999999999% of the time paints the royals as some sort of godly creatures that require our deference .

    It has been difficult for those who have already seen the light, many victims of these crown despots, to watch the endless media circus's duplicitous fraud presenting some of the most evil barstewards on the planet as the GOOD guys. That is so far from the truth, the degree they will manipulate news to present the richest despots across the globe as wonderful human beings. You don't get yourself to such a status without creating a fascist like state that monitors and spies on the peasants to ensure they comply with the orders and rules set up by the royal mafia and enforced by their masonic henchmen embedded, especially in the legal and political systems , and in every major position of power across the UK. The only thing you can admire about this network is how so many 'sheeple' actually believe the outrageous lies told to them incessantly and unendingly to ensure they are kept groomed and loyal to these thugs that compromise all of our safety and security.

    Especially for those who sleep rough on our streets, thanks to the vast inequality their system creates that ensures they and their scumbag lackeys always have the biggest slice of the pie, while the peasants are thrown the scraps. The homeless seldom if ever get anything once the peasants are finished with what little is left . It is not only extremely nauseating but disgusting how their henchmen embedded in the media dare to criticise anyone who questions the morals and ethics of how a small self appointed elite group should be celebrated for having so much power, wealth and privilege. It is the outright stupidity of their loyal followers who like star struck kids trail after these blood sucking leeches as though they are deserving of their worship, while the vile crown facade continues to masquerade as some sort of force for good .

    Only a massive wake up call by their bought and paid for loyalist allies will see the enormous change required to restore sanity to a sick and depraved country were large sections of the population are denied even the most basic tools to survive. Many of their victims lives irreparably changed forever when confronted by the judicial mafia who are right at the cutting edge of how the Crown holds onto that power and wealth.
    POLITICAL CAREERS WOULD END FOR DARING TO CRITICISE THE ROYAL MAFIA
    royal oyster The queen , via her hired masonic thugs, hand pick the political, legal and media goons that will ensure this absurd dynasty continues ad infinitum. Careers END for daring to challenge their wealth, power and privilege, but especially their EVIL control network.

    Next week the frenzy over the royal wedding will be unstoppable, a force that is as intimidating as a juggernaut on an empty motorway. The anachronistic absurdity of Britain's royal family, with its vast inherited wealth and theoretical power cannot be touched. No public figure who governs or hopes to govern can go near the issue, whatever their personal views.

    Instead they must pay homage, bow or curtsy when the time comes, and never question why it is that inherited peerages are abolished but the Queen opens Parliament every year and appoints a prime minister after an election on the basis of the hereditary principle, or why inherited wealth is viewed with a degree of wariness, at least in relation to most other people but not to those born into this particular family. Next week's wedding will mark the latest episode of enforced ostentatious political orthodoxy. Messrs Cameron, Clegg and Miliband will be there with their wives, or wives-to-be, smartened up and in some cases struggling to convey a stately joyfulness. I would guess that neither Miliband nor Clegg are entirely comfortable with this weird national celebration. Clegg comes from a European tradition where royal families have lower profiles and are not subjected to compulsory adulation.

    Miliband's political ideas and background are unlikely to have embraced enthusiasm for royalty. But they will be there, and if they are asked they will say how thrilled they are to attend and how delighted they are for the young couple. They will not be allowed to state any reservations. It would be the end of their careers. Soon after the 1997 election, a minister suggested to me that the Cabinet contained more republicans, or critics of an overblown monarchy, than any previous administration. One of Gordon Brown's aides told me once that privately he was a republican. I have no idea whether or not this was the case. Brown gave no public hint of disquiet and referred occasionally to "her Majesty" in reverential terms as he desperately sought to assure Middle England that he was one of them. But given his wider politics and fascination with the US, I would not be surprised if his adviser was correct.

    Harriet Harman famously left the country for the royal wedding of Charles and Diana. I doubt if her instincts have changed, and yet, as acting leader of the Labour Party, she expressed delight at the prospect of next week's over-the-top madness. Before the 1997 election, two senior Labour figures, Jack Straw and Mo Mowlam, put different cases for a modernised monarchy, closer to some of those in Europe. They were quickly silenced, although what they were suggesting was sensible and modest. Even at the top of the Conservative Party there may be the occasional sceptical beat in an otherwise monarchical heart. Apparently Steve Hilton, David Cameron's most senior adviser, does not share the Prime Minister's excitement about the royal wedding. Again I have never discussed the issue with Hilton so have no idea whether this is the case, but you can bet every penny of the deficit that this is one policy area where Hilton will hold no sway if he is a critic of the fuss and flam and all that it implies.

    There has never been a moment when senior politicians who wanted to win elections could come out. Roy Hattersley did so after his aspirations to lead had long gone. Tony Benn is a publicly declared republican but his views are only accepted because he will never rule as an elected politician. There is a myth that in the late summer of 1997 the royal family was under pressure when people gathered in London after the death of Diana while the Queen was absent in Balmoral. The demonstration was spurred by the precise opposite of republicanism. The people were demanding that their Queen came to be with them. When she returned they were content. That is why the political leaders who are intelligent enough to see through the nonsense and the dangerous political message the family inadvertently carries about the legitimacy of inherited wealth and talentless fame have no choice but to keep quiet. Voters would turn on them, along with most newspapers. What political leader would challenge the frenzy? Imagine the headlines that Red Ed would generate if he expressed what he probably thinks. Clegg would be bashed around in some quarters in ways that make the onslaught against the tripling of student fees seem like a tea party. Everyone has to play the game. The BBC used to hold special days over a weekend when it rehearsed what it would do when the Queen Mother died. Later I found out that one of the editors of these ridiculous days of pretend broadcasts was something of a republican himself.

    Probably some of the royals have their doubts. Prince William conveyed a sad yearning for normality in photos published during his time as a student. He is not allowed to express such a desire if it exists. His mother spoke with mesmeric force in her famous Panorama interview. She was not a republican but she would have been up for modernisation and might have been an instrument to bring it about. The brouhaha over next week's wedding is silly, at best. Some politicians know this to be the case. They will not say so and I do not blame them. It is political correctness gone mad.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Fuck the Queen - I'm not an ant I'm not a bee (VIDEO)
  • All the queens men (lackeys) gather at Westminster pre-wedding
  • Why The Zionist British Royal Family Should Hang
  • UK CRUSADER CHALLENGES ELITE TYRANNY
    john anthony hill THE Battle for TRUE Freedom

    Are you looking for a way out of the System? Do you want justice for the false-flag terror attacks in the U.S., U.K. and elsewhere? Do you want to end the endless wars in the Middle East that are bankrupting both the U.S. and the U.K.? The only solution is a change of government. Many people recoil in horror at the thought of a revolution, and for good reason: human history has shown that revolutions cause ruin and death, while often resulting in few improvements for the common man. It doesn't have to be that way.

    A unique opportunity has presented itself to create a new government in a peaceful and logical manner. It doesn't require us to take up arms nor does it require us to go to war. All that is required is our solidarity and support for someone who is doing the hard work for us all. That man is John Anthony Hill.

    He is striking at the very heart of the evil NWO system. He needs your support right now, not only for his benefit but for OURS. And all we have to do is get up off of our backsides, join forces against this evil and spread the word to everyone we can. We are at THE crossroads.

    We have a choice to either unite against this evil and crush it once and for all or we can continue to do nothing and whine about how bad things are getting, right up until the moment all of this evil crushes us. Don't think it's possible? THINK AGAIN. The NWO is planning to exterminate 90+% of the world's population through wars and poisoning the population in various ways. They are so brazen they have written this plan in stone. If you doubt this please look it up for yourselves. It's guideline #1 on their Georgia Guidestones.

    Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

    So what is this unique opportunity to avoid being exterminated?

    The essence of this unique and unprecedented opportunity rests in an unusual court case involving John Hill, Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect" which can be googled and downloaded for free. Please see http://jforjustice.co.uk/77/ For those who may not be familiar with the 7/7/2005 London bombings, they were a false-flag terror attack orchestrated by the British government against the British people, much like 9/11. The film exposes this in less than an hour using nothing but mainstream media reports which is why the British government has been punishing John Hill for more than two years. THEY don't want you to watch the film because it leaves no reasonable doubt in the rational mind of the guilt of the British government and their complicit mainstream media, who all work for the same person…

    pharoahqueen Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, also known as Elizabeth II, who has been fraudulently pretending to be the queen now for 58 years. To better understand just how evil this really is and why this is important not only to the people of the U.K., but to everyone in the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and ALL of the British Commonwealth nations, it must be understood that she is the richest woman on the planet. She is the single largest landholder, reportedly owning over 6600 million acres, which is 1/6 of the present land-mass of this planet. She is the head of the United Kingdom and all of the Commonwealth countries. She is the head of the Church of England. She is the head of the Committee of 300. She is at the top of the NWO power structure.

    For Americans who may be wondering why this is important to them, please consider the fact that she controls the U.S. as well, through the banks and the legal system and the American people are still paying tribute to her. The same group of people who own the Bank of England own the Federal Reserve. The B.A.R. association, that all practicing lawyers are a member of, ALL serve her. B.A.R. stands for "British Accreditation Registry". Please remember that most congressmen and judges are lawyers as well which should help provide a better understanding of the magnitude of the control this woman has on the U.S. And if you doubt Americans are paying the "queen" tribute/tax, please study the Treaty of 1783. Americans have been paying tribute to the British monarchy ever since supposedly having won the Revolutionary war. Maybe the financial arrangement with the British monarchy is what made it so revolutionary. So now with a slightly better understanding of just how rich, powerful and evil Elizabeth II really is, what is this court case with John Hill all about?

    It's about proving that Elizabeth II is a fake. A fraud. A criminal impersonating the monarchy. And John Hill has rock-solid proof that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg/Mountbatten knowingly, and with malice-aforethought, was UNLAWFULLY crowned upon a fake Coronation Stone. John Hill also has documented proof that she has violated her Coronation oath at least 3401 times to date, even if she had been lawfully crowned in the first place, which she most definitely was not. Which would explain why THEY have imprisoned him for 150 days, officially for sending DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to a U.K. court as an Amicus Curiae (Friend of the court) brief. He sent the DVDs to prevent a miscarriage of justice after both the judge and the QC barrister lied to the jurors about the guilt of the 4 alleged 7/7 suicide bombers. They rewarded him for doing the right thing by arresting him and threatening him with life in prison.

    But one of the most interesting facets of this case is that this gross injustice has actually afforded John Hill the opportunity to challenge the authority and the jurisdiction of the so-called "queen" and expose her to the world for the fraud that she really is. Please bear in mind that all of the courts are "her majesty's" courts and ALL of the judges have sworn an oath to, and draw their authority from, the queen. But if she is a fraud (and she is a fraud), then NONE of the courts are operating lawfully since they gain their authority from her. It is this contradiction in the legal system that John Hill will be exposing in painstaking detail at the trial. Please see the article at the following link for more details about the case: http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=17925 John Hill is now out on bail and awaiting this trial on May 9th, 2011 in the Southwark Crown court in London, England. Please see http://mtrial.org for the latest details in the case.

    He needs our support, and more importantly WE need him to win. This is our opportunity to make a REAL difference in this world. Will YOU finally take action against this sea of hatred or will you fade into the shadows? There are a number of ways to support this effort. First of all, please spread the word. Contact any and all media outlets. Tell your friends. Spread the word any way you can. You cannot afford to sit idly by on this one. And for any of you that have the means, be there at the Southwark Crown court in London on the 9th of May. Overfill the courtroom. Show the system that we will not go down without a fight. As you know, the NWO puppet governments don't want to surrender their power peacefully, so they will try to cheat somehow. The more people that are watching this trial, and in attendance that day, the harder it will be for the system to cheat.

    If the idea of a peaceful revolution interests you, then please spread this information to everyone that you know that cares about freedom and justice. Do it right now and make sure it gets done. You know you've never seen anything like this before. Opportunity knocks only once and this is a fight or die situation for all of us. This is not only an unprecedented opportunity, it's a blueprint. Once this idea is proven in England, peaceful and lawful revolutions can take place in the USA, Canada Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, etc. Or we can wait around to be exterminated just as the NWO has told us they are going to do to most of us. Simple choice really.

    This is our most desperate hour. Our actions now can change this world forever for the better. Our inaction will result in the suffering and deaths of billions. Do the right thing, and you will be giving yourselves and your loved ones a fighting chance to survive by breaking this legislative stranglehold and delivering this crucial blow to the NWO. Godspeed to you Anthony John Hill and thank-you from the bottom of our hearts for all you are doing.

    http://www.henrymakow.com/ukcrusader.html

  • SOURCE
  • BRITISH ROYALS COURTING PUBLICITY FOR THEIR OWN ENDS


    A RARE OCCASION WHEN THE BRITISH MEDIA SHOW ANY DISSENT AGAINST THE ROYAL MAFIA

    The Royals are philistines, the Queen doesn’t listen and Charles has a laugh like a pig’s snore: Martin Amis attacks the monarchy

    One of Britain’s most famous novelists has launched a scathing attack on the Royal Family, calling them philistines. Martin Amis portrays the Queen as a woman who never listens and says Prince Charles has ‘a pig’s snore’. The author of bestsellers like The Rachel Papers and Money, speaking to French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, also rounds on the Royal Wedding.

    He suggested it is a cynical attempt to maintain the status quo and that the Royals are courting publicity for their own ends. ‘There’s indeed something which doesn’t work in this story, says Amis, referring to the upcoming nuptials on April 29th. ‘One can’t, in the era of media supremacy, make one's children go through everything which a wedding like this entails: not only the loss of one’s private life; but also the sacrifice of oneself pure and simple.

    ‘The royal family is so spied upon, so scrutinized by the media that the life of these children becomes quite unbearable.’ Amis claimed both William and Harry could have both avoid the international circus surrounding their royal status if they remained single. ‘Harry and William rebelled some eight or nine years ago and they effectively let people know that they weren’t going to sacrifice their lives anymore for the crown.

    ‘They were probably told that it’s the oldest institution in Europe and that they had to preserve it by all means possible. The princes finally gave in. ‘But how can we, today, ask for so much from a human being?’ Asked if other people will support the wedding with sincerity, Amis replies: ‘Without doubt. The atmosphere is going to be irrational, very British in a sense. ‘Usually, when the crowd descends on the street it’s to find windows to break. Now, the crowd will be standing outside passively. It’s difficult not to be moved by this enthusiasm. It’s difficult not to think about it in a positive way.

    ‘Without counting that, in the crowd, there will be Pakistani immigrants, Africans - the most enthusiastic perhaps. It’ certainly a good thing as far as the plan for social integration is concerned.’ The latest edition of Le Nouvel Observateur is devoted to Britain, and the Royal Wedding, with a colour picture of William and Kate on the front. But Amis says: ‘I’ve met the Queen, indeed, along with other writers on I don’t know which occasions anymore.

    Asked directly what he thinks of the Royals in general, Amis replies: ‘They are philistines.’ He added: ‘As for the British aristocracy, its pathetic. All that snobbery is ridiculous today.’

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • JEWISH TAKEOVER OF THE UK
    jewish take over


    One leads the Labour party, one leads the Tory party as Prime Minister and the other will be the future Queen. All of them have jewish roots and no doubt lackeys for the Zionist agenda that filters out from Israel. You could not make this up how one of the smallest races / religions on the planet happens to have all the key positions of power, not only in the UK, but around the globe.

    Freemasonry behind the selection of new blood for key roles that enable Zionist Israel to pull the strings of all western governments.

  • Kate Middleton's jewish roots
  • THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN: BEGINNERS GUIDE TO THE JEWISH QUESTION (VIDEO)
  • POMP AND CEREMONY BEHIND THE BLACK NOBILITY WEDDING VIDEO


  • Royals courting publicity for their own ends using wedding
  • COUNCIL BANS ANTI-ROYAL STREET PARTY
    AS ALL COUNCILS IN THE UK ARE RUN BY MASONS WHO ARE ROYALISTS THEY WONT ALLOW ANYTHING THAT CHALLENGES THE ROYAL DESPOTS AND THEIR CREEPY SATANIC WEDDINGS.

    Right royal farce as Labour council bans 'alternative' street party

    Whatever happened to free speech and tolerance of other views? Camden council has banned an anti-monarchy group from holding an "alternative" royal wedding street party. Republic had applied - and received approval - to hold a fun "Not the Royal Wedding" event for up to 300 people in Covent Garden on April 29, starting just after Kate Middleton arrives at Westminster Abbey. But it was subsequently told the party could not take place after the Labour-run council refused to approve a road closure in Earlham Street, apparently after complaints from local businesses including West End landlord Shaftesbury plc.

    Republic, which frequently questions the amount of public money that is spent on the royal family (around £30 million a year excluding security) and backs "people power rather than inherited privilege", appears a far cry from the violent activists who ran amok during recent TUC and student marches. It believes it is the victim of political prejudice and is consulting lawyers to sound out the possibility of court action. Republic's press release is here. It has also been busy tweeting to deny the various inaccurate claims made in a statement released this morning by Camden council, and vows the event will go ahead - even if another location has to be found.

    I've asked Camden to provide details of the businesses that have objected, and to explain what it termed the "potential for disorder". Needless to say, the press officer who issued the statement had little knowledge or appreciation of its contents. I'm also awaiting a response from Shaftesbury. The party is the only one of almost 600 across London that is daring to challenge what Republic calls an "avalanche of royal wedding hype".

  • NOT THE ROYAL WEDDING PARTY PERMIT
  • FULL ARTICLE HERE