GOOGLE SCUMBAGS, YOUTUBE CENSORSHIP,TWITTER AND FACEBOOK

FACEBOOK'S ZUCKERBERG: PART OF THE ILLUMINATI AGENDA VIDEO
NEW PRIVATE SEARCH ENGINE: DUCKDUCKGO

CLICK TO TRY
FACEBOOK IS PART OF THE CIA 'SPOOF' VIDEO
FACEBOOK IS A CIA DATABANK
by Sandeep Parwaga (henrymakow.com)

In my Feb. 16 article ''Facebook & Google are CIA Fronts,'' I argued that Facebook and Google data mine information about you. This is now public knowledge.

The Associated Press reported November 4 that the CIA has an entire center dedicated to monitoring Facebook and Twitter. They also monitor TV stations and print newspapers and . "The Open Source Center," established in 2005 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence , has been operating since the 9/11 Commission's call for foreign counterintelligence. Though the CIA claims it only monitors foreign activity, I am skeptical. Not only been the CIA been using proxies, but has devoted an entire center for that operation.

Facebook A Privacy-Eroding Network, Not Social Network

Remember when Mark Zuckerberg called his users ''dumb f****''? If that is not a clear sign of the disdain for the Facebook users, consider these new disturbing facts. Nik Cubrilovic, an entrepreneur, hacker and writer, revealed that Facebook tracked and stored the Internet browsing of its 750 million users even after they had left the site. This blog story gained mainstream attention and Facebook conceded it had happened, but denied it was intentional and used for tracking.

In my last article, I mentioned that you should avoid clicking on trivial buttons on Facebook, for example the ''Likes'', because I assumed there was something shady about it. I discovered recently that when you click on any Like button, you are opening yourself up to being tracked by Facebook. When Zuckerberg announced the ''Like system'' during a conference (called F8) in 2010 promoting it to make the web more ''social'' and ''smarter'', cnet.com reported '' What Zuckerberg didn't point out is that widespread use of the Like button allows Facebook to track people as they switch from CNN.com to Yelp.com to ESPN.com, all of which are sites that have said they will implement the feature.''

According to the article, ''Even if someone is not a Facebook user or is not logged in, Facebook's social plug-ins collect the address of the Web page being visited and the Internet address of the visitor as soon as the page is loaded--clicking on the Like button is not required. If enough sites participate, that permits Facebook to assemble a vast amount of data about Internet users' browsing habits.'' So for example, if you visit CNN.com, ''the Like system'' is able to track your move on that site simply because CNN.com is part of that system. If you then go to ESPN.com you are still being tracked by the Facebook plug-ins, so you don't really need to be a user of Facebook. Another interesting issue I have discovered was the so called ''cloud computing''. Cloud computing refers to '' the delivery of computing as a service rather than a product, whereby shared resources, software, and information are provided to computers and other devices as a utility (like the electricity grid) over a network (typically the Internet).''

In an article from the Wall Street Journal, Bruce Schneier reports that cloud computing ''Is one of the fastest growing IT market segments -- 69% of Americans now use some sort of cloud computing services - '' Facebook also uses this cloud computing system. Mr. Schneier links articles that outline the fact that the cloud computing system is anything but secure and private. According to Mr. Schneier, Google's Terms of Service ''explicitly disavow any warranty or any liability for harm that might result from Google's negligence, recklessness, malevolent intent, or even purposeful disregard of existing legal obligations to protect the privacy and security of user data.''

Facebook does exactly the same through its Statement of Principles and Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Apple has also launched the cloud computing system recently. If you thought that was enough, check this out. Facebook has started a system that can recognize faces so it makes it easier for ''friends'' to tag you. There is not much to say about this, except that it is a very creepy technology. This system has gained funding from the government to track so called ''terrorists''. Now Facebook does that for the government as well.

CONCLUSION

If we think about it, Facebook is nothing but a big Orwellian spy grid. All Facebook's offerings ultimately lead to being tracked. A few months ago I decided to ''delete'' my Facebook account for good. Besides all the Orwellian reasons I ''deleted'' my account, I also considered Mark Dice's Youtube clip ''Defriend Day''. Dice says that people's homes got robbed when they post a vacation status or kids got busted for underage drinking. The Open Source Center director admits that overseas individuals are being monitored which I suspect is only half the truth. Let's not forget the tremendous amount of lies that have come from the establishment in the past years regarding monitoring and privacy.

For example, it was well known that the FISA law (Foreign Intelligence Service Act) not only spied on foreigners, but on domestic citizens as well. If you have any concern for your privacy, I would recommend what I recommended before: 1) Try to keep a low profile. 2) Don't reveal anything personal or don't click on trivial buttons, for example the ''Likes'' 3) Use alternatives to make contact if you can, e.g. email or other messengers. 4) Get rid off it for good.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Facebook tracks which sites 800m users visit... even AFTER they sign off
  • GOOGLE ASKED TO REMOVE 135 YOUTUBE VIDEO'S FOR 'UK NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUES'
    US technology giant reports 71% rise in content removal requests from UK government or police

    Google revealed figures for YouTube content removal requests in its biannual transparency report

    British police authorities ordered the removal of 135 videos from YouTube in the first half of this year because of a perceived threat to national security, according to figures published by the video sharing website's owner Google. The US technology giant reported a 71% rise in content removal requests from the UK government or police, compared with the final half of 2010, with almost 200 YouTube videos requested to be taken down following complaints about privacy, security or hate speech.

    Google revealed the figures in its biannual transparency report, part of an effort to highlight online censorship across the world. The report shows that private information about 1,443 British users or accounts was demanded by law enforcement agencies between January and June this year. It is the first time Google has revealed how many users the data requests relate to.

    Google received 1,273 overall requests for user data in the period, compared with 1,162 requests for information in the second half of 2010. The UK government made 65 content removal requests from all of Google's products in the six months to June, up from 38 requests in the previous half year.

    Fears over national security saw take down requests for 135 videos from YouTube, with a further 62 for privacy, security or hate speech issues. Almost 30 items were requested to be removed from Google search after two court orders relating to privacy and security, the report shows, with 14 items because of defamation issues. Google said it fully or partially complied with 82% of requests from the UK government, police and courts.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Google accused of censorship after agreeing to remove blog posts (as well as pulling youtube video's)
  • How to find out who Google thinks you are from your web history (use startpage instead HERE )
  • Twitter sparks free speech fury by announcing it will censor messages country-by-country
  • Google no longer on the UP!!!!!
  • New private search engine: duckduckgo.com
  • WILL STEVE JOBS' FINAL VENDETTA HAUNT GOOGLE?
    Google can only hope that Steve Jobs' final vendetta doesn't haunt the Internet search leader from his grave.

    The depths of Jobs' antipathy toward Google leaps out of Walter Isaacson's authorized biography of Apple's co-founder. The book goes on sale Monday, less than three weeks after Jobs' long battle with pancreatic cancer culminated in his Oct. 5 death. The Associated Press obtained a copy Thursday. The biography drips with Jobs' vitriol as he discusses his belief that Google stole from Apple's iPhone to build many of the features in Google's Android software for rival phones. It's clear that the perceived theft represented an unforgiveable act of betrayal to Jobs, who had been a mentor to Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin and had welcomed Google's CEO at the time, Eric Schmidt, to be on Apple's board.

    Jobs retaliated with a profane manifesto during a 2010 conversation with his chosen biographer. Isaacson wrote that he never saw Jobs angrier in any of their conversations, which covered a wide variety of emotional topics during a two-year period. After equating Android to "grand theft" of the iPhone, Jobs lobbed a series of grenades that may blow a hole in Google's image as an innovative company on a crusade to make the world a better place. "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong," Jobs told Isaacson. "I'm going to destroy Android because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go to thermonuclear war on this. They are scared to death because they know they are guilty."

    Jobs then used a crude word for defecation to describe Android and other products outside of search. Android now represents one of the chief threats to the iPhone. Although iPhones had a head start and still draw huge lines when new models go on sale, Android devices sold twice as well in the second quarter. According to Gartner, Android's market share grew 2 1/2 times to 43 percent, compared with 17 percent a year earlier. The iPhone's grew as well, but by a smaller margin — to 18 percent, from 14 percent. Both Google and Apple declined comment to The Associated Press when asked about Jobs' remarks. Jobs' attack is troubling for Google on several levels.

    It suggests that Apple, which has pledged to be true to Jobs' vision, may try to derail Android in court, even if Google obtains more patent protection through its proposed $12.5 billion acquisition of phone maker Motorola Mobility Inc. The derision comes across as a bitter pill for Page and Brin, who have hailed Jobs as one of their idols. It also appears to contradict Schmidt's repeated assertions that he remained on friendly terms with Jobs even after he resigned from Apple's board in 2009. Most of all, Google should be worried whether the Android brand is damaged by the withering criticism of a revered figure whose public esteem seems to have risen as friends, colleagues and customers paid tribute over the past few weeks. "The words of cultural icons have a lot of power after death," veteran technology analyst Rob Enderle said. "This almost sounds like a spiritual leader declaring a jihad on Android as his dying wish."

    Apple fans tend to be fiercely loyal, making it more feasible to envision an anti-Android movement taking shape like some kind of political protest, Enderle said. It's also possible that Jobs' criticisms of Google may be seen as hypocritical. That's because some of Apple's computing breakthroughs were based on technology developed by others. The Mac's easy-to-use interface and its mouse controller, for instance, came out of Xerox Corp. The bitter divide between two of the most beloved and successful technology companies would have seemed inconceivable a few years ago.

    In 2006, Google and Apple were on such friendly terms that Jobs welcomed Schmidt to Apple's board of directors with these words: "Like Apple, Google is very focused on innovation and we think Eric's insights and experience will be very valuable in helping to guide Apple in the years ahead," Jobs said. But in 2008, a year after the iPhone came out, Google unveiled plans to release Android as a free software system that phone makers can use to make devices that compete with the iPhone. Jobs was so infuriated that he went to Google's Mountain View headquarters — about nine miles from Apple's Cupertino office— to try to stop the project, according to the biography. Jobs' persuasive powers failed to sway Google's leaders.

    Now, more than 550,000 devices running on Android are being activated each day. Apple, meanwhile, sold about 3 million fewer iPhones than anticipated in the July-September quarter, contributing to a sharp drop in the company's stock. The newest Android challenger to the iPhone, the Galaxy Nexus from Samsung, is scheduled to go on sale next month. Although there's no indication in the book that he ever forgave Google, Jobs set aside his disdain for the company long enough to counsel Page nine months ago, according to the biography. After Google's Jan. 20 announcement that Page would replace Schmidt as CEO in April, Page called Jobs for some pointers. Jobs told Isaacson that his first instinct was to reject Page with a curt expletive, but he reconsidered as he recalled his times as a young entrepreneur listening to the advice of elder Silicon Valley statesmen including Bill Hewlett, co-founder of Hewlett-Packard Co.

    Jobs didn't mince words when Page arrived at Jobs' Palo Alto home. He told Page to build a good team of lieutenants. In his first week as Google's CEO, Page reshuffled his management team to eliminate bureaucracy. Jobs also warned Page not to let Google get lazy or flabby. "The main thing I stressed was to focus," Jobs told Isaacson about his conversation with Page. "Figure out what Google wants to be when it grows up. It's now all over the map. What are the five products you want to focus on? Get rid of the rest because they're dragging you down. They're turning you into Microsoft. They're causing you to turn out adequate products that are adequate but not great."

    Page has shut more than 20 Google products and services in his first six months as Google's CEO as part of an effort to "put more wood behind fewer arrows." It was the type of discipline Jobs instilled on Apple when he returned in 1997 after a dozen years of exile. Jobs killed such products as the Newton handheld device and the PC clones that were allowed to run on Apple's operating system. It still remains to be seen whether Jobs' words of wisdom or his grievances will leave a bigger imprint on Google.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • FACEBOOK: A CIA PROJECT VIDEO

  • Behind Facebook—A New World Order Agenda?
  • GOOGLE AND THE DISAPPEARING WEBSITES
    GOOGLE MAKE WEBSITES DISAPPEAR FROM SEARCHES. CONTENT IS BEING CENSORED AND ONLY AN OUTRIGHT BOYCOTT OF GOOGLE WILL STOP THEM INTERFERING WITH GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS THAT ARE NOW A BLOODY JOKE. IXQUICK IS AN OBVIOUS ALTERNATIVE. GOOGLE ARE NOW THE BIGGEST THREAT TO TRUTH AND JUSTICE ALONGSIDE YOUTUBE.OUR OWN WEBSITE STATS DROPPED WHEN GOOGLE STARTED THIS NONSENSE BUT HAS PICKED UP WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM GOOGLE ALGORITHM'S DIVERTING USERS AWAY FROM ALL THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA.THERE WILL COME A DAY WHEN GOOGLE IS A SPENT FORCE AND THAT CAN'T HAPPEN SOON ENOUGH.

    Transport tycoon Sir Brian Souter has accused Google of stopping links to his website appearing when people search for it.

    On 13 August the site "mysteriously disappeared" from results returned for a search on "Brian Souter". Sir Brian has vowed to launch a campaign to end what he dubbed "search engine censorship". Google declined to comment on the case but said site rankings were calculated from many different measures. "It's not Google's place to decide which sites we can see and those we can't," said Sir Brian in a statement.

    The site in question, www.briansouter.com, details Sir Brian's life, includes a picture gallery and gives news updates about the Stagecoach founder. A spokesperson for the businessman said his site was not commercial and is not used for political purposes. Sir Brian's views have sometimes proved controversial, not least his campaign against the repeal in Scotland of Clause 2A which banned schools from "promoting homosexuality". He said that Google had been asked on 22 August why the site had disappeared from searches.

    The California company "mumbled" a response about changes made to its search algorithm, according to Sir Brian. In a statement Google said it could not comment on individual cases. "Our search algorithm relies on more than 200 signals to help people find the answers they're looking for, and and last year alone we made more than 500 improvements to our algorithm, while experimenting with thousands more," it said in a statement. Advice about how to improve the ranking is also believed to have been passed to Sir Brian's office.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Traffic plunges for Google+ as 60% of users log off
  • Google Censorship - How It Works
  • Google in danger of influencing society through page rank manipulation
  • Search on ixquick
  • About ixquick
  • Katherine Albrecht : U.S. Media Relations for search engine ixquick.com
  • GOOGLE FINALLY GETS UNITED GRAND LODGE ON THE MAP
    google ugle For years Google have blocked street views around the MASONS United Grand Lodge of England on Wild Street . Any time street view was used to enter Great Queen street there was always a road block which meant a major part of that area could not be viewed on street view.

    They have finally gotten round to publishing that area around the UGLE building which was suspicious that they never seemed to complete what they started out to do that was to map London. Are the freemasons also controlling the agenda of Google via their goons operating inside Google? How many of their staff are card carrying members of the biggest secret society on the planet?
    YOUTUBE UNPRECEDENTED NUMBER OF MISSING VIDEO'S AFTER EGYPTIAN UNREST
    As a group who have collated information over many years we have been SHOCKED at how many Egyptian video's of the uprisings have been pulled from Youtube for all sorts of spurious reasons. Some of them suggest the uploaders themselves have removed the video. So why would they take the time and effort to do so if they were only leaving them on Youtube for a very short space of time?

    We have had to remove at least 10 articles regarding Egypt as the video's that were used in conjunction with these articles have been pulled. This is a disturbing trend going on within the Youtube hierarchy , part of the Google empire who we are well aware have been censoring video's en masse . However the depths of how deep that censorship goes is only now coming to light when not only have a massive amount of Egyptian video's been pulled but video's from other countries across the region that have seen uprisings against their dictatorial leaders.

    We are beginning to see why Google wanted Youtube and now have control over large swathes of video's trying to get out the truth but something Google and Youtube seem determined to undermine.
    YOUTUBE IN MASS CENSORSHIP OF POLITICAL ACTIVIST'S VIDEO'S VIDEO
    GOOGLE HANDING OVER FOREIGN USERS DATA TO AMERICAN (ZIONIST) SPY AGENCIES
    Google Admits Handing over European User Data to US Intelligence Agencies

    Google has admitted complying with requests from US intelligence agencies for data stored in its European data centers, most likely in violation of European Union data protection laws. Gordon Frazer, Microsoft UK's managing director, made news headlines some weeks ago when he admitted that Microsoft can be compelled to share data with the US government regardless of where it is hosted in the world. At the center of this problem is the USA PATRIOT ACT, which states that companies incorporated in the United States must hand over data administered by their foreign subsidiaries if requested.

    Not only that, but they can be forced to keep quiet about it in order to avoid exposing active investigations and alert those targeted by the probes. This situation poses a serious problem for companies like Microsoft, Google or Amazon, which offer cloud services around the world, because their subsidiaries must also respect local laws. For example, European Union legislation requires companies to protect the personal information of EU citizens and this is clearly not something that Microsoft, Google, Amazon, or any of their EU customers can do.

    This is not only a theoretical problem. According to German-language magazine WirtschaftsWoche [Google translate], a Google spokesperson confirmed that the company has complied with requests from US intelligence agencies for data stored in its European data centers. The situation is likely to spark an official inquiry from the European Commission, with some members of the European Parliament already reacting to the stories. It's hard to foresee what kind of solution can be found at this point, but one thing's clear - US-based cloud providers operating in EU can be forced to break the law. European companies and government agencies that are using their services are also in a tough position.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • GOOGLE IS NOW A GLOBAL THREAT TO THE INTERNET
    From a good idea that initially started to transform the ease with which searches could be made on the internet to a global censor, corporate pal of the rich press barons , dodgy data gatherer directing users away from the 'TRUTH' and a Zionist sympathiser. The days when GOOGLE did any good are long past their sell by date.

    When you see the power Google wields it is reminiscent of the power the Murdoch empire so heavily abused and to what degree is the data Google has been collecting on us all, at some point in the future if not already, being misused and abused? How much of the collated info of Google is getting to the Israeli zionists and their Mossad spying thugs who already control the global media and now are trying to take over the internet? Google has been trying to justify massive changes to their search algorithms but in effect they are selectively directing users away from the REAL TRUTH of what they and their many global conglomerate friends are all about.

    Ask any alternative site just how few search hits from Google pass their way since their changes? Using Google to search for the BEST source of information is like trying to find an honest cop , an almost impossible task.

  • Google denies Panda hit on rival
  • A BRILLIANT ALTERNATIVE TO THE GOOGLE SCUMBAGS

    WE HAVE BEEN TESTING IXQUICK AND CAN SAY WITH CERTAINTY A MASSIVE ALTERNATIVE TO GOOGLE. WE ALONG WITH MANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE SITES HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF SEARCH RESULTS THANKS TO GOOGLE FAVOURING THE GLOBAL CORPORATE MEDIA. IXQUICK HAS MANY MANY ADVANTAGES TO GOOGLE INCLUDING NO RECORDING OF IP ADDRESS, USING THEIR PROXY TO VISIT A SITE, THEY HAVE IMAGE, VIDEO AND TELEPHONE NUMBER SEARCHES. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO BIG BROTHER GOOGLE. WE NO LONGER USE GOOGLE IN LIGHT OF THE SERIOUS ISSUES OVER DATA ABUSE AND MANIPULATING THEIR SEARCH CRITERIA.

  • Search on ixquick
  • About ixquick
  • Katherine Albrecht : U.S. Media Relations for search engine ixquick.com
  • IXQUICK: THE WORLD'S MOST PRIVATE SEARCH ENGINE
    ixquick Google is proving NOT to be trusted anymore with their dodgy search algorithms and data gathering. Trying to find an alternative FAST before they absolutely dominate and control to the point were truth and justice is lost in their Zionist New World Odour data manipulations isn't easy. IXQUICK has come to our attention and claims to be the most private search engine on the planet that claims "Ixquick does NOT record your IP address! ".

    We dont think ANY search engine should have the absolute monopoly on searching across the internet but this may be a decent alternative to Google who are totally abusing their position creating the same diabolical system as the press barons created suppressing news that undermines our rights and freedoms. THAT WE CANNOT ALLOW TO HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Search on ixquick
  • About ixquick
  • Katherine Albrecht : U.S. Media Relations for search engine ixquick.com
  • GOOGLE / YOUTUBE CONSPIRING WITH GOVERNMENTS TO REMOVE VIDEO'S VIDEO


    We ourselves have had Youtube remove our video's for malicious reasons including exposures of Common Purpose muppets who complained some of their logo's were used during the making of the video. Youtube agreed that was a breach of their copyright which is outrageous. Despite having almost 400 video's on that channel Youtube threatened removal of ALL of those video's and we embed many video's from other groups that are disappearing by the day. Youtube are removing video's that upset the ruling mafia at an enormous rate. We cannot keep up with the speed at which those video's are being removed for the most paltry of reasons and without any means to challenge Google/Youtube's draconian censorship of very important video's

  • Ixquick Web Search:the world's most private search engine
  • GOOGLE'S MASTER PLAN VIDEO

  • Facebook & Google are CIA Fronts
  • Facebook fatigue sets in for 100,000 Brits: Users bored with site deactivate accounts amid privacy fears
  • Delete Facebook
  • TARGETED BY GOOGLE
    We, like many alternative news sites, have been a target of Google . Previously searches would have taken you to news in a balanced way until Google at the behest of the powers that be dramatically changed their algorithms to ensure alternative news sites either came very low or did NOT appear at all on their search criteria.

    We had a temporary blip when Google instigated this malicious code change to create a search system that only provided the complicit media with priority. We can safely say that this has only had a temporary effect as Google will NEVER dominate the internet to the point were they can aid and abet the suppressing of the disclosure and exposure of the plans of the ruling elite. Google are acting exactly the same as the corporate giants that have been enslaving the world thanks to the hold they have had over news output. Google cannot win this war for the rights of internet users to have news reported far more accurately and truthfully from sources that do not have a corporate masonic agenda.

    So this is a message to the Google scumbags who think tinkering with users searches will create an internet were they control a Zionist agenda. Now they have been exposed for what they are doing internet users are changing their methods for accessing information that hopefully will see the demise of search engine giants that would dare to control the information highway away from the truth spilling out from alternative sites across the globe.

    IN ITS INFANCY GOOGLE WAS A GREAT ADVANTAGE FOR INTERNET USERS BUT AS IT HAS BECOME MORE POWERFUL IT HAS TURNED INTO A MAJOR HINDRANCE IN FINDING THE TRUTH AND MUST BE STOPPED BY USERS REFUSING TO ACCEPT MANIPULATION OF SEARCH CRITERIA.

  • Who's afraid of Google?
  • Ixquick Web Search: the world's most private search engine
  • Google denies Panda hit on rival
  • HARASSMENT BY YOUTUBE (GOOGLE OWNED) OPEN MESSAGE TO SERGEY BRIN VIDEO
    GOOGLE MANIPULATING SEARCHES AWAY FROM RIVALS AND CRITICS
    We have been warning about how Google and Youtube have been manipulating searches and removing videos away from anything that does not follow their Zionist agenda. This is a perfect example that proves Google has become far to powerful and demonstrates how they ARE rigging searches to suit their agenda. Google create little information only use and abuse the information provided by others including our own particular reports on human rights abuses and injustice. For anyone concerned about manipulation by the mass media they should equally be concerned about how Google is deviously undermining search results away from rivals and critics.

    IF GOOGLE THINK THEY CAN BLOCK INFORMATION GOING OUT FROM THIS WEBSITE AND OTHERS WITH SIMILAR EXPOSURES THEY OBVIOUSLY THINK THEY CAN NOW CONTROL THE WHOLE INTERNET. THAT CAN ONLY LEAD TO THEIR OWN DEMISE. TRUTH WILL ALWAYS GET OUT NO MATTER WHO TRIES AND BLOCKS IT. THE COMPLICIT MEDIA HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR CENTURIES AND NOW GOOGLE ARE ACTING IN THE SAME WAY.


    Google denies Panda hit on rival

    Google has defended recent changes to its search system that reduced the prominence of some popular websites. One of the worst hit by the "Panda" update was Ciao.co.uk, a Microsoft-owned company that had been leading an EU competition case against Google. Its web visibility fell by 94% according to analysis by Searchmetrics. Google's head of search evaluation, Scott Huffman, said it was "almost absurd" to suggest that the results were rigged. The company regularly changes the algorithms that determine what users see when they search.

    Rankings

    Such updates are often done to weed out "content farms" - websites that copy material from other sites in order to get hits. Where a keyword search may previously have returned their site on Google's first page, afterwards it may be relegated to further down the rankings. When the update, known as Panda, was rolled out globally on 11 April, Google published a blog post explaining that it was designed to "reduce rankings for low-quality sites".

    Shopping and price comparison sites such as Ciao.co.uk sometimes suffer when Google algorithms change because they carry comments and reviews replicated elsewhere on the internet. However, experts said that it was unusual to see a legitimate website hit as badly as Ciao. "A 94% drop is astronomical," said Sanjay Shelat, a search engine optimisation (SEO) specialist at Edit Optimisation. "It is very unusual to take such a hit in an update. That is enough to put a company under."

    Competition case

    Ciao.co.uk was involved in initiating an EU investigation into Google in November 2010. Parent company, Microsoft, claims that Google has used its dominant position to limit rivals' products. The BBC asked Microsoft if it thought the downgrading of Ciao results was related to the legal action, but Microsoft said it would not be commenting on the situation "at this time".

    When questioned by news agency AFP, Google's Scott Huffman said: "If you think of the scale of what we are talking about, it is almost absurd to say we could rig results." Mr Huffman pointed out that the update had received a very positive response from Google users.

    Search visibility

    Searchmetrics analysed Google results in response to a range of keywords, both before and after the Panda update. Alongside Ciao's 94% reduction in visibility, it found that hubpages.com fell by 85% and eHow.co.uk dropped 53%. A similar analysis by Sistrix found a 81% drop in visibility for Ciao.co.uk, 72% reduction for hubpages.com and an 84% fall for eHow.co.uk.

    While a sharp drop in visibility may constitute a crisis for some websites and their search engine optimisation (SEO) engineers, it does not necessarily spell disaster. Technology news website Electricpig.co.uk was downgraded by 94% by the Panda update, according to Searchmetrics. Site editor James Holland told BBC News: "We haven't seen an immediate impact.

    "Comparing our traffic from Google for that week, we're actually only down 0.5% versus the week before Panda took effect. "That suggests most of the keywords Searchmetrics are measuring us against weren't being clicked anyway, and our best-performing stuff is still doing the business."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Who's afraid of Google?
  • Why Has Google Been Collecting Kids' Social Security Numbers Under the Guise of an Art Contest?
  • Google Seeks to Weaken Search Engine Ranking of "Content Farming" Websites
  • Websites to Google: 'You're killing our business!'
  • DOODLE 4 GOOGLE Parent Consent form requiring part of child's social security number
  • Is Google getting too big for its boots?
  • GOOGLE IS GETTING JUST TOOO BIG FOR ITS BOOTS
  • Jewish hand behind Internet
  • GOOGLE AND YOUTUBE : COPYRIGHT OR CENSORSHIP? VIDEO
    GOOGLE AND SEARCH ENGINE BIAS
    DUE TO THE RECENT MAJOR CHANGES TO 'GOOGLE' ALGORITHMS THAT ARE NOW GREATLY DISTORTING GOOGLE SEARCHES AWAY FROM ALTERNATIVE NEWS OUTLETS WHILE GREATLY FAVOURING THE 'MURDOCHS' OF THE PUBLISHING WORLD, THIS ARTICLE SHOWS THE GROWING POWER OF 'SEARCHES' ON THE INTERNET AND HOW COMPANIES LIKE 'GOOGLE' ARE ACTING MORE LIKE THE VERY CORPORATIONS THEY CLAIM NOT TO BEHAVE LIKE. NOW DOING A SEARCH ON GOOGLE IS MORE LIKELY TO PROVIDE A RESULT THAT PUTS YOU RIGHT BACK WHERE THE PRESS BARONS CONTROLLED THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY.

    The new 'electronic monks' will not be guardians of the scarce information; but they will be guiding users to the relevant information. The old monks may have been defending the information storehouse; the new electronic monks will provide the compass to guide users through the ocean of information. But in each case, it is the monk who stands at the gateway to the information that will lead to knowledge and understanding. (Melody, 2003, p. 11)

    The thesis begins from a general interest in the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in creating what some have called the Information Society, a new type of social and economic organization akin to the agricultural or industrial society, but based upon wide availability of information and a new dominance of the role of information in everyday life (Webster, 2002).

    The internet, it has been argued, has a key role to play in this transformation. According to one prominent theorist writing about the Information Age, Manuel Castells:

    “The internet is the fabric of our lives. If information technology is the present-day equivalent of electricity in the industrial era, in our age the internet could be likened both to the electrical grid and the electric engine because of its ability to distribute the power of information throughout the entire realm of human activity” (Castells, 2001, p. 1)

    Nevertheless, despite the increasing importance of information in understanding modern society, critical scholars Herman and McChesney make the claim that the public interest in the internet is being left behind, giving citizens “no rights in cyberspace beyond those it [They] can exercise as capitalists or consumers” (Herman & McChesney, 1997, p. 133). It seems to me that the very centrality of the internet to the information society demands scholarly inquiry into how the network is being used outside its commercial context. Therefore, this research focuses on an area of the internet where the public interest may be being undermined by commercial activities; an area which has no direct analogue in the non-internet world and yet is recognisable as a media market: the internet search engine. Search engines, also sometimes called portals, are particularly interesting because of their centrality as both starting points and guides in the emerging content structure of the World Wide Web. As the quote from William Melody that introduces this section indicates, those who stand at the gateway to information exercise a particular power over that information even when their power derives from an ability to guide the search engine user.

    This thesis is not a study of internet infrastructure in the traditional sense of fibre-optic cables or computer hardware. Rather, it is a study of some of the structuring principles of online content. To take a television analogy, it focuses neither on particular shows nor on audience reception, but rather on practices akin to scheduling. To take a newspaper analogy, it focuses not on the text of particular stories but rather on layout and distribution.

  • FULL EXTENSIVE ARTICLE HERE
  • Who's afraid of Google?
  • GOOGLE MAIL LOGO'S REMARKABLE RESEMBLANCE TO A MASONIC APRON
    google mail
  • via Henry Makow
  • GOOGLE IS GETTING FAR TO BIG FOR ITS BOOTS
    royal google LEFT: GOOGLE'S ROYAL CONNECTIONS

    Alternative news sites have suffered a major blow after GOOGLE manipulated its search engine algorithms to reduce the chance of alternative sites being found on their results. Instead the mainstream media that has been controlled for far to long get priority on GOOGLE searches and undermining the free flow of information across the internet.

    Google is acting just like the corporate multi-nationals that used to dominate information and reducing alternative sites to second class citizens. The stats to alternative sites have rapidly reduced after GOOGLE set this biased search system in motion. We have been getting all sorts of disturbing news about corporate GOOGLE including a recent exposure that GOOGLE have been collecting childrens social security numbers under the guise of an art competition.

    GOOGLE UK OFFICE Google has become far to big for its boots and acting just like the corporate media it claims NOT to be biased in favour of. By manipulating google searches to give massive advantage to the press barons and Murdoch's of this world it is becoming another arm of the BIG BROTHER network that can no longer be trusted to provide accurate search criteria greatly affecting how people get information.

    We recommend Yahoo search as an alternative to GOOGLE's repressive search engine criteria.

    GOOGLE also owns Youtube and there have been disturbing exposures about Google's bully boy threats used to remove video's and video channels under the guise of copyright but usually only when those video's do not agree with GOOGLE's HIDDEN zionist agenda. We have personally received similar threats for the most ridiculous excuses and threats to remove large amounts of video that sits on Googles Youtube servers.

    As can be seen from the above map how close do you need to be to the queen than just down the road from Buckingham Palace? There is a none to cosy a relationship building up between this search engine and the biggest despot on the planet . Any criticism of that regime can easily be buried using the manipulation of search results that Google have already proven they will use to bury anything that is critical of the world's ruling elite starting with the British royal mafia.

  • Why Has Google Been Collecting Kids' Social Security Numbers Under the Guise of an Art Contest?
  • Google Seeks to Weaken Search Engine Ranking of "Content Farming" Websites
  • Websites to Google: 'You're killing our business!'
  • DOODLE 4 GOOGLE Parent Consent form requiring part of child's social security number
  • Is Google getting too big for its boots?
  • GOOGLE IS GETTING JUST TOOO BIG FOR ITS BOOTS
  • Google fined £90k by French privacy watchdog for gathering and storing data through Street View cameras
  • Jewish hand behind Internet
  • WEBSITES TO GOOGLE: 'YOU'RE KILLING OUR BUSINESS!'
    google spy Google made one of the biggest changes ever to its search results this week, which immediately had a noticeable effect on many Web properties that rely on the world's biggest search engine to drive traffic to their sites.

    The major tweak aims to move better quality content to the top of Google's search rankings. The changes will affect 12% Google's results, the company said in a blog post late Thursday. "Our goal is simple: to give users the most relevant answers to their queries as quickly as possible," said Gabriel Stricker, Google spokesman. "This requires constant tuning of our algorithms, as new content -- both good and bad -- comes online all the time. Recently we've heard from our users that they want to see fewer low quality sites in our results." Typically, Google's algorithm changes are so subtle that few people notice them. But these most recent changes could be seen immediately.

    How to test the change: The IP address 64.233.179.104 displays Google search results as they would have appeared before the recent algorithm change, according to several webmasters posting to the WebmasterWorld.com forum. Google would not confirm that IP address uses the older algorithm, but comparing searches of trending topics on google.com with searches using the special Google IP address reveals how the search engine now seems to be favoring certain content. The changes appear to be affecting so-called "content farms" the most, which are websites that amass content based on the most-searched terms of the day. Demand Media, AOL, Mahalo and the Huffington Post have all been accused of such tactics, including a notable "story" from HuffPo about the Super Bowl that Slate.com media critic Jack Shafer called "the greatest example of SEO whoring of all time." Tests using trending topics show Google's tweaks in action.

    The current top Google result for a search of Charlie Sheen rant target "Haim Levine" is a New York Daily News page, followed by a story from gossipcop.com. The old algorithm would have featured two Huffington Post stories at the top, with the New York Daily News story not appearing appear until the second results page.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • TWITTER LIBEL CASE VIDEO
    THE TRUTH ABOUT FACEBOOK VIDEO


  • Facebook fatigue sets in for 100,000 Brits: Users bored with site deactivate accounts amid privacy fears
  • Facebook loses 6,000,000 American users in May
  • Behind Facebook—A New World Order Agenda?
  • TWITTER'S HIDDEN AGENDA
    twitter Like every new communications tool on the internet we do tests to see the effectiveness of how they operate. Any internet tool promoted by the corporate media always gives cause for concern especially if the BBC think it is a good idea. The BBC have been pushing radical feminist and homosexual agenda's for so long it makes most of their news coverage laughable the degree to which they ignore crimes of those they want to protect in that agenda. Heterosexual men have been bashed endlessly, by not only the BBC but GMTV , while homosexuality is promoted as the moral compass that is the direction the UK should be going. Some critics might question why the corporate media are so biased in their reporting?

    The British government fear heterosexual men more than any other group in society. It has been heterosexual men throughout history that have overthrown tyranny from both ruthless monarchy's and governments and it is always in their interest to ensure those men are kept in their place. None more so than in the family courts were the crown's masonic judges fleece men of their assets and homes physically and mentally reducing them to such a position were they have little strength or energy to fight the deepening UK police state. Many women now realise this as they face the same horrors of British courts and the theft of their children when the father is removed from their childrens lives.

    Going back to twitter it seems from our own tests of twitter, like the corporate media who heavily promote this relatively new communications gizmo, that they have ways to ensure the usual broadcasters featured on the corporate media get far more exposure than the rest of us lesser mortals. Who ultimately wont benefit from Twitter, as the same corporate message will always get maximum exposure due to how twitters operating system can flush out anything that does not endlessly repeat the mantra of corporate media dupes and goons who get maximum exposure for drawing the crowds. The sheeple are still drawn to the personalities the Zionist controlled media promote and who wont rock the establishment boat. Twitter is another area were they are subtly dominating us with celebrity messages while masking the real agenda of what Twitter has evolved into. Another tool for the same mob that controls the corporate media to pull the wool over our eyes. Look at where their venture capitalist money is coming from to know where their agenda's lie?

    WE AIM TO BE NOTHING LIKE TWITTER WITH 'QUALITY' NOT QUANTITY AND WHERE BILLIONS OF PIECES OF USELESS INFORMATION ARE GENERATED THAT ARE OF LITTLE OR NO INTEREST TO MEN. WHEN THE BBC CONTINUALLY PROMOTE 'TWITTER' AND 'FACEBOOK' TO SUCH A DEGREE WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE AGENDA BEHIND THE MASS COLLECTION OF DATA ON US ALL. TWITTER 'THE INFORMATION OVERLOAD SPECIALISTS' MASSIVELY DILUTE THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES AFFECTING MEN AND THEIR FAMILIES.READ MORE ABOUT TWITTER'S HIDDEN AGENDA HERE

  • The Jewish hand behind Internet
  • Twitter users only find 36% of tweets they receive interesting (a TON of useless info)
  • The Truth about Facebook! (VIDEO)
  • Time to give Twitter a break
  • Twitter's security flaws and teenager who sent it into Japanese porn meltdown
  • FACEBOOK AND MOSSAD
  • The Facebook crimewave hits 100,000 in the last five years
  • Workers, Be Careful: Facebook Snoops Looking Over Your Shoulder