BANKING SCAMS AND THE ULTRA WEALTHY WHO PULL THE STRINGS

  • TOP FIVE BILLIONAIRE HEDGE FUND MANAGERS ARE ALL JEWISH
  • NEVER trust a bank (List of failures since 2008)
  • Iceland Sentences 26 Corrupt Bankers To 74 Years In Prison
  • Banksters Gangsters Traitors
  • Are debt collectors chasing you? 3 ways to reply to a threatening letter
  • Empire - The Rise of the Oligarchs (VIDEO)
  • Bank of England governor blames city greed for vast inequality meanwhile warning that welfare state is unaffordable
  • For the duped goons who think there is NO money left in the kitty(Who exactly are buying these then?)
  • World’s Most Expensive Streets (and their press barons lie that there's no money)
  • A basic income for everyone? VIDEO
    The Only Game in Town
    (left, the "key" to understanding the world today bears repetition)

    The medium of exchange (money, currency, credit) has no intrinsic value. It is a coupon created in the form of a "debt" to a cartel of Masonic ( Cabalist, Satanist) Jewish bankers. This is something government could do itself interest and debt-free. Your "money" is really government IOU's to these central bankers. No matter which bank you use, you're dealing with them.

    History and current events are nothing but the attempt to protect this crooked monopoly by extending it to every aspect of human life by degrading and enslaving humanity through war, terrorism, migration and occult entertainment/social engineering. "We corrupt in order to control," said Giuseppe Mazzini. Jewish Messianism, Zionism, Socialism, Communism and Freemasonry are merely tools. Society has been thoroughly subverted and colonized by this occult power and doesn't even know it because mass media and education are controlled by them. Many Jews and Freemasons are collaborators but everyone who wishes to succeed in public life must become an accomplice. Modern society is built on quicksand. We are mind-controlled slaves, but thanks to the Internet, more people are waking up. Col. Dall personally confronted [FDR handler] Louis Howe (left) over Russian Communist agents he saw meeting Howe in the White House. -- "FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law" (1970)

    (from Jan 28, 2013)

    by Henry Makow Ph.D.

    In 1913, Congressman Charles August Lindbergh said: "When the President signs this bill; the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized...The greatest crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill...The day of reckoning is only a few years removed."

    Prophetic words.

    The establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913 set off a chain of baneful events that blighted the 20th century and darkens our prospects for the 21st. It began with World War One and the Great Depression, and continues with the WTC and the wars on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. In 1913, America's leaders were bribed and bamboozled by mostly foreign bankers and their US agents. Our "leaders" committed treason by giving these bankers the power to create money out of thin air backed only by the credit, i.e. taxes, of the American people. The U.S. government now borrows its own money from international bankers and pays them interest to the tune of $250 billion per annum for the privilege. If you hoodwinked the United States in this fashion, what would you do?

    You would either give the magical power back to its rightful owner, the US government. Or, you would use it to take over the world, to own everything and to control everyone. Guess which choice the bankers made?

    Modern history displays a long-term plan by dynastic banking families and their allies to create an Orwellian World dictatorship ("New World Order") in which wealth will be further concentrated, and human life will be further degraded. Wars and depressions, modern art and culture, new age religion, sexual "liberation" and feminism, are all part of this design. The role of historians and the mass media is to obscure this plan and to beguile the masses into thinking they are free and their leaders represent their interests.

    FDR EXPOSED BY SON-IN-LAW

    This conviction was reinforced by Col. Curtis Dall's book, "FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law" (1970). Dall, who was married to Franklin Roosevelt's daughter Anna, spent many nights at the White House and often guided FDR around in his wheelchair. He was also a partner at a Wall Street brokerage. Dall maintained a family loyalty but could not avoid several disheartening conclusions in his book. He portrays the legendary president not as a leader but as a "quarterback" with little actual power. The "coaching staff" consisted of a coterie of handlers ("advisers" like Louis Howe, Bernard Baruch and Harry Hopkins) who represented the international banking cartel. For Dall, FDR ultimately was a traitor manipulated by "World Money" and motivated by conceit and personal ambition.

    FDR's main perfidy was suppressing information about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, at the cost of almost 3,000 lives. He did this because the bankers needed US involvement in WWII, something 85% of Americans opposed. The Japanese had instructions to call off the attack if they lost the element of surprise. Dall relates a less known but more telling anecdote. In 1956, George Earle, a former governor of Pennsylvania, told him that in 1943 the Nazis tried to surrender. At the time, Earle was Naval Attaché in Istanbul when Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, approached him personally. Canaris told him that the German generals felt Hitler was leading Germany to destruction. They could not accept Roosevelt's policy of "unconditional surrender," but if FDR would offer "honourable surrender," the army was prepared to stage a coup d'etat.

    They believed that Russia represented a threat to Western Civilization and they were ready to present a non-Nazi German bulwark against Communist designs in Eastern Europe. To make a long story short, FDR repeatedly ignored this proposal which could have ended the war in 1943 and saved millions of lives. Canaris and hundreds of other decent German officers were tortured and killed by the Gestapo. The bankers' policy, as exhibited by the fire bombing of German cities, was clearly to 1) prolong the war and inflict maximum damage on Germany, 2) ensure that Soviet Russia occupy Eastern Europe and become a major world power.

    COMMUNISM AS MODEL OF MANKIND'S FUTURE

    This is consistent with Dall's other observations. The banking cartel acted as if Communist Russia was their personal creation, which it was. One of FDR's first acts in office was to recognize the Soviet regime. FDR advisers Henry Morgenthau and Harry Dexter White arranged for U.S. treasury printing plates to be sent to Russia so the Communists could print their own US money. They arranged $8 billion in lend lease aid to Russia after the war was over. Col. Dall personally confronted Louis Howe over Russian agents he saw meeting Howe in the White House. According to Antony Sutton ("Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution"), the Bolshevik Revolution was funded by international bankers. In 1917, Trotsky and 200 revolutionaries were literally transferred from New York's Lower East Side to St. Petersburg to foment the revolution. What are we to make of all this?

    We have to recognize that monopoly capital has an affinity with Communism. Both are enemies of competition and freedom. A Communist government can give the cartels control of raw materials and markets. It can provide huge contracts and take on huge debts. A Communist government can ensure social control in order to protect the concentration of wealth. Each sector of the US economy is now controlled by a handful of cartels. Could we be facing Communism with private instead of public monopoly? Is it a coincidence that the Communist Party term "politically correct" has entered the American lexicon?

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Tommy Tiernan Every country in the world owes money, but to who?? VIDEO
    Elizabeth Warren Describes BIG Banks As Financial Terrorists! VIDEO
    British banking & biggest legal heist VIDEO


  • Bank of England helped the Nazis to sell stolen gold
  • The Big Short: The ultimate in fraud and thievery VIDEO
    Rich expecting to live forever VIDEO
    A Monstrous IMF Secret VIDEO
    British bank closes account of pro-Palestinian VIDEO
    World Bank: Money Laundering Criminals VIDEO
    Britons spending £40 billion more than they earn VIDEO
    John Perkins - Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption VIDEO
    The Economic Hitmen VIDEO


  • Complete List of BANKS Owned or Controlled by the Rothschild Family
  • The vulnerability of the credit card system VIDEO
    Privatization scams VIDEO
    Ex federal reserve chairman Ben Bernanke on American war profiteering VIDEO
    Gerald Celente about Rule 48 VIDEO
    Amazon's cut-throat corporate jungle VIDEO

  • Amazon fires back after scathing workplace critique(VIDEO)
  • A day in the life of a warehouse wage slave
  • Pay inequality has now reached "stratospheric levels"
    Chief executives earn '183 times more than workers'

    FTSE 100 chief executives (CEO) earn on average 183 times more than a full-time worker, research suggests. A report by the High Pay Centre, a think tank which monitors income distribution, showed that top bosses earned on average £4.964m in 2014.

    That compares to £27,195 median pay for a full-time employee in 2014, according to official figures. The High Pay Centre said the executive pay packages went "far beyond what is sensible...to inspire top executives."

    The pay gap did not increase dramatically between 2014 and 2013, when chief executives earned 182 times the average workers pay, but the High Pay Centre points out that it is much bigger than in 2010, when CEOs earned 160 times more. "Pay packages of this size go far beyond what is sensible or necessary to reward and inspire top executives," said Deborah Hargreaves, director of the High Pay Centre. "It's more likely that corporate governance structures in the UK are riddled with glaring weaknesses and conflicts of interest."

    Since 2013 UK-listed companies have had to publish a single figure detailing their top executive's salary, as well as being required to give shareholders a binding vote on directors' pay. Ms Hargreaves added that while the reforms had helped to get a better understanding of executive pay, they didn't go far enough.

    'Make or break'

    The think tank would like companies to publish their own figures on the difference in pay between executives and their workers. It would also like a structure in which employees are represented in pay negotiations. In response to the study, the TUC said that inequality had now reached "stratospheric levels" while the Unite union called for institutional investors to "use their clout to draw a line in the sand over CEO pay". The business lobby group, the CBI said that high pay was only ever justified by "exceptional performance" and there must always be a clear link between the two.

    "In FTSE 100 firms and beyond, it's important that boards and shareholders hold the highest earners to account," the CBI said in a statement. "Shareholders now have a vote on companies' pay policies and it is important that this is used effectively." But the free-market think tank, the Adam Smith Institute, was more forthright, saying that the right chief executive could make or break a company.

    "CEO pay rewards extraordinary talent and skills in a highly competitive, globalised market," said its deputy director Sam Bowman. "Good decision-making from the top might not be invaluable, but CEO pay reflects that it is as close to invaluable as one can get."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Amazon's slave labour
  • Property Bubble VIDEO
    Britain’s housing crisis deepens VIDEO
    Multi-millionaire pubs tycoon JD Wetherspoon boss branded a 'hypocrite' over paying staff a living wage


    These are the bastards that use the tory scum to keep the peasants in their place

    A multi-millionaire pubs tycoon was last night branded a ‘hypocrite’ for moaning about paying his workers the living wage.

    Government plans in the Budget will force employers to pay at least £7.20 an hour from April next year, rising to over £9 by the end of the decade. But JD Wetherspoon chairman and founder Tim Martin (pictured) complained that paying staff more would hit the company’s profits. He said that the new laws add ‘considerable uncertainty to future financial projections’ for the company. The pub chain’s lowest-paid workers earn £6.35 an hour if they are over 21, states its own website.

    This means an employee working an average 35-hour week would take home £11,557 annually before taxes – more than 30 times less than the £353,000 collected by Martin last year. In fact, Martin’s allowance for car and train travel is £29,000 – almost three times the total sum taken home by his company’s most junior employees. Martin founded the company in 1979 by taking over a pub in North London’s swish Muswell Hill neighbourhood. It has since expanded to become a national giant with more than 800 outlets and annual profits of almost £80million.

    The company’s success has helped Martin amass a small fortune. His shares in the firm are worth £237million, and he was 366th in the Sunday Times Rich List. But he yesterday used its trading update to take a swipe at the National Living Wage policy, which Chancellor George Osborne said would give a pay rise to 6m workers. A statement from Martin, who in an unusual move refused to talk to the media directly, said: ‘Increased labour costs affect pubs with far greater force than supermarkets. ‘The average price of a pint in a supermarket is less than £1 and we estimate staff costs to be around 10 per cent or 10p. In contrast, a pint in a pub costs around £3 and staff costs are about 25 per cent or 75p.’ Martin says the difference between supermarket prices and pub prices is killing his industry.

    He often highlights the tax burden borne by landlords, which includes beer duties and VAT on hot food as well as staff taxes Almost 100 pubs close every week, according to industry estimates. The enforced wage rises come on top of promises already made by JD Wetherspoon to increase pay for staff next month, as well as an extra 5 per cent minimum starting pay increase that was brought in last autumn.

    The firm also says it pays around a third of profits to staff in bonuses and free shares, with 80pc of this paid to staff who work in its pubs. But Luke Hildyard, deputy director of the High Pay Centre, said Martin’s comments were ill-judged and branded him a ‘hypocrite’. He added: ‘There’s something pretty ugly about the multi-millionaire owner of a massive business bleating about having to pay his staff enough money to live on.

    ‘Everyone wants businesses to flourish, because this benefits the whole of society by creating jobs and growth. ‘But if those jobs don’t even enable workers to put food on their table and a roof over their heads, then the benefits to society are lost and support for business-friendly policies is undermined.’ Martin’s attack on the Conservative plan, which was announced in last week’s Budget, came as the company reported that it had enjoyed bumper trading figures. Sales rose 6.5 per cent as 26 new pubs were opened during the year.

    The company also plans to increase the number of pubs it owns, with 20 or 30 expected to be opened in the next year. Shares in JD Wetherspoon fell 65p or 8.4 per cent to 706p, valuing the company at close to £860m.

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Tom Crawford Arrested during eviction debacle VIDEO


    Freemason cops to busy helping steal property to do any police work
    The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind VIDEO
    The Coming Financial Collapse Of Great Britain VIDEO
    The Wall Street Shut Down VIDEO
    Austerity? Not when your living in a £12million apartment with Harrods on speed-dial VIDEO


    The vile inequality that emanates in London and encircles Britain
    Pick a pocket or two VIDEO
    Beware Bankers Bearing Debt Crack! VIDEO

  • BANKS 15
  • BANKS 14
  • BANKS 13
  • BANKS 12
  • BANKS 11
  • BANKS 10
  • BANKS 9
  • BANKS 8
  • BANKS 7
  • BANKS 6
  • BANKS 5
  • BANKS 4
  • BANKS 3
  • BANKS 2
  • BANKS 1