YOU DON'T NEED TO LOOK LIKE THE PERCEIVED VIEW OF WHAT A SLAVE LOOKS LIKE TO BE A SLAVE

To all intents and purposes, there are NO FREE MEN IN AUSTRALIA!

Try going to an Australian Court and saying "No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, either dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor pass over him, nor send over him, except by means of the lawful judgment of his own equals which is the law of the land" .. and see how far it gets you! Australia's "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" are, without doubt, "the sons of (those) snakes" of England's 16th and 17th century. Now, if you are a free man, then there's no lawful way you can be denied a Jury.

These cretins have now put in place their own regulations that, if you want some trusted friend to act on your behalf in Court, you can't have it. They tell you that you can only have a "legally qualified legal practitioner" to re-present you. They won't accept any "Power of Attorney" you may had had drawn up and witnessed by a Justice of the Peace. "Your consent is immaterial". Also, they have come down on the practice of having a McKenzie's Friend. If want a trusted friend to help argue your case, again what you want is "immaterial".

A SLAVE is "a person whose consent is immaterial."

And what of when you sing the Australia National Anthem* with the words, "For we are young and free". Australians are not free! .... Australians are all pathetic unintelligent slaves.

Being free means that you are not under the control or domination of someone else.Try to exercise any measure of freedom by showing any sort of resistance to orders by supposedly "Public Servants" (such as Police and Judges) and you will very smartly be dealt with by imprisonment, fines and your property and assets taken from you. Of course, they are acting unlawfully.... but they don't care.

You may have the right but they have the might... and gleefully they doth use it.

What, again, are the 4 Boxes in Defence of Liberty? 1. the SOAP box; 2. the BALLOT box; 3. the JURY box, and 4. the AMMO box.

1. the SOAP box is treated with distain by the criminal and traitors... "Let they have their marches and write their letters. We simply ignore that rubbish."

2. the BALLOT box, ie: voting to representatives in parliaments, is well taken care of by the criminals and traitors .. and parliaments do whatever the bankster tell them to do.

3. the JURY box has been rendered impotent by people's lack of education, by misinformation from the media, by judges lying to and bullying everyone attending court (especially jurors), and simply by Trial by Jury, itself, being flat-out denied.

4. the AMMO box is also well taken care of because the criminals and traitors have disarmed a lot of the people while training and excessively arming their own forces against the people.

The Banks and Judges think they have the whole game wrapped up... and they do...... and the time is rapidly approaching when all resistance will be futile. Our ONLY HOPE is with the 3rd Box in the Defence of Liberty.... the JURY Box ... and it is IN THE COURTS where we have got to FIGHT FOR FREEDOM by over and over and over and over DEMANDING our inalienable RIGHT to TRIAL BY JURY.

The RULE OF LAW is on our side.

Thomas Jefferson said,"If the people don't know how to govern themselves, then educate them." The people need to be educated about "the glory of English law"... about TRIAL BY JURY.

JAIL THE JUDGES:

YES >>>>> THE COURTS ARE OUR GOAL.

To TAKE BACK OUR COURTS, we have to DEFEAT THE ENEMY who have taken them from us and are now encamped there. "Australian Judges Are Frauds, Liars, Criminals, Traitors and Fools" is one of my leaflets and "Courts Are Government" is another.

NOTHING LESS than CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS will achieve our OBJECTIVE of restoring TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY. Using any "clever" ploy of weaselling out situations by rabbiting on about "legal fictions" or "syntax" or such legalistic manoeuvring, actually recognizes and endorses their criminality and treason. You are saying, "Okay. You can continue to be the Judges you claim to be, and you can continue to destroy our laws and our liberties. As long as you let me off, that's all right with me, Your Worship, Your Grace, three bags full, Your Honour." The Bill of Rights 1689 calls them, in black and white, "evil".

Firstly, we produce the PUBLIC NOTICE declaring Australia is a Common Law Jurisdiction (attached) and follow it up with a full-on CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT. THAT is how we THROW DOWN THE GAUNTLET. THAT is how we CLAIM WHAT IS OURS ......... and Australian Courts are OUR Courts.

John Wilson. Chairman, Australian Common Law Party

PS: * Re: the Australian National Anthem, it's really only a song because the word "anthem" means "hymn" and there's no mention of God in "Advance Australia Fair".

PPS: I will be answering questions on Saturday the 8th of October at the Sydney Forum.

MORE ON AUSTRALIAN COURT BATTLES HERE

REPORTING ON FRIDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2011:

Mark Flowers acquitted himself very well, this morning, when his Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court came up for a "Mention" in the District Court of New South Wales at Parramatta. (Attached is Mark's Challenge ... with an ACLP stamp added to the first page) Of course, Australian Judges are all Frauds, Liars, Criminals, Traitors and Fools.... and being as they are, they have no intention of allowing anyone to BRING THEM TO JUSTICE.

The Challenge to the Jurisdiction does just that.

Therefore, what happened to Mark, this morning, is exactly what these evil creatures do when confronted by someone trying to restore Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy, and wanting no more than a FAIR GO.

"His Honour" M L Sides QC LIED and THREATENED.

"His Honour" M L Sides QC denied Mark had any Right to Trial by Jury, and denied that Mark could Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court.

"His Honour" M L Sides QC threatened Mark that, if he persisted, Mark would be made a "Vexatious Litigant" - an illegal device these "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" have invented to strip anyone of their Civil, Political and Human Rights to be able to seek Justice in Australian Courts. This is, in fact, OUTLAWRY ..... making someone an OUTLAW and depriving them of Free Access to the Courts - an outrage abolished by the "Free Access to Courts Act 1400 2 Hen 4 c 1" and Internationally ILLEGAL.

This is how they silence any dissenter ... anyone who (as Mark Flowers did) looks at these creeps in the eye and says, "I am a Freeman and a Sovereign Human Being. I have the inalienable Right to Trial by Jury." Mark has gone away to think over his situation. He said he is "on a sharp learning curve" and wished he had known about Common Law years ago "because things would be different now".

Mark was well dressed in suit and tie with moderately-sized Christian Cross on a chain around his neck. Mark spoke intelligently and politely.

Had my day in court last wednesday - IRD V The LEGAL FICTION,The court was supposed to convene at 10am - at 10.35 the judge entered the courtroom - I refused to stand for the Judge - nothing happened except the clerk of the court yelled out - hey u in the back of the courtroom "STAND UP" by the time she had stopped speaking the judge had sat down as everyone else had - she started walking towards me - I thought good here goes but she just gave me a filthy look and walked past me, dam - no police to help me create a scene, how do I do this now.

Before going to courtroom - I filed a Notice of understanding and Intent with fees written in inclusive of my Denial of Consent with the court manager and also told him that he along with all his minions where perpetrating a massive fraud by trying to force the 'SLAVE STATUS' onto flesh and blood living beings, he asked how that worked - so I explained to him about the CAPITOL LETTERING of names and what it signified - his response was - "that's only a formatting issue with Government computers" sorry mate you are either naive or committing fraud I replied, he stamped my documents - wished me good luck after browsing thru the 12 pages- I asked him if by filing these documents, will the judge get to see them? he said probably not, but he would try to get them to the judges attention. He then offered me some advice on how to set out a affidavit correctly for legal purposes and gave me a sample copy - most helpful so maybe he didn't understand what they where doing with CAPITOL lettering of names? anyway back to courtroom.

When my name was called - I remained silent till it was called a second time, I yelled out from back of courtroom - "that sounds like my name" butterflies in my gut like you wouldn't believe- the judge calls out - "WELL IS IT YOUR NAME OR NOT" - It sounds like it could be but I want to see the paperwork that purports to have my name on it - do you want me to stand - the Judge - "YES STANDUP" my chance - I stated - I WILL STAND ON CONDITION I DO NOT WAIVE MY COMMON LAW RIGHTS NOR DO I CONSENT TO 'in persona jurisdiction' whereupon I stood up Just as the judge said OH STANDUP, He asked the lawyer representing the IRD if they had identified the PERSON they were calling - she pointed to me, WHEREUPON he turned to me and asked -"are you THE PERSON CALLED" I walked to the front of the public gallery - didn't enter their area of court room .

Again I asked to see the paperwork that had my purported name on it - the judge handed the summons to the clerk who with a dirty look on her face handed me the summons - I looked at it for about 20 seconds(a long time) The judge snapped "Well are you THAT PERSON (accentuating that person which I thought rather interesting how he was doing that) I replied NO YOUR HONOUR - THAT name is a legal fiction created by Government to enslave the people - it is a commercial entity - I held up high and offered forward my birth certificate and stated by name is on this birth certificate in upper and - AT WHICH POINT HE CUT ME OFF - Are you THAT PERSON ? Are you THAT PERSON or not? he was getting pissed off - Again I stated and accentuated the same as he had done - "NO, I AM NOT ' THAT PERSON' pause 'THAT PERSON is a legal fiction" whereupon he stated - "Let it be known THAT PERSON isn't present in court so issue a warrant for the arrest of THAT PERSON"

THE judge had acknowledged in court in front of a full courtroom and about 30 odd lawyers that the flesh and blood being standing in front of him with birth certificate as proof of Identification was Not the same as the entity named on the summons in capitol letters. During the 10mins or so this took place - It really sticks in my head how he kept accentuating "THAT PERSON" - are you THAT PERSON?

I can't help think that maybe he was over 1/2 an hr late convenning the court cos he was going thru the papers I had filed and had an inkling of where I was going with challenging his jurisdiction and the validity of what the IRD where up too. I was expecting to have been held in contempt of court but walked out feeling - somewhat relieved but also very very curious about how and what had just happened - still can't help thinking he knew what I had planned to do in court - the way he was accentuating those two words.

I have put up a notice in the window of my front door in case the uniformed thugs come looking for the LEGAL FICTION informing them THAT PERSON doesn't reside here - have a happy day/month/eternity looking for him. Just have to wait and see what IRD decide to do next - ready for those bastards too - if they continue I WILL GO PUBLIC WITH EVERYTHING i KNOW ABOUT HOW THEY CAME INTO EXISTENCE - THE FRAUD - THEFT - DECEITFUL PRACTICE and how they are complicit in MANSLAUGHTER. thats all in PART TWO. fuck them all I SAY - You guys are really battling over there - my thoughts are with you all - over here the sheeple don't care what the government does - I've spoken to so many but they just aren't interested - I'm an idiot for putting myself at risk as far as they are concerned - as long as they have RUGBY RACING and BEER they are happy little slaves (FUCKWITS).

New Zealanders are a timid lot just like Kiwis - what fucken use is a bird with no wings that can't fly and is afraid of the light so hides in the dark aah thats why NZers call themselves KIWIS. I'm a New Zealander NOT A KIWI - third generation ITALIAN grandparents maybe thats where I get my passion from. GOOD LUCK and keep up the GOOD FIGHT

Kindest regards Joseph : Da Via

Here is an Australian Free Man CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF AUSTRALIAN COURTS.

He filed the CHALLENGE on 12 September 2011 and is listed for FRIDAY 23rd SEPTEMBER 2011 in the District Court at Parramatta

SEE THE ATTACHMENT!!!!!

The usual way in which the Australian Judiciary avoid being exposed to the Truth is to arrogantly and arbitrarily say, "I have Jurisdiction ... and that's an end of it.You do not have the Right to Trial by Jury."... which is a diabolical violation of the Rules of Natural Justice, their Judicial Oath, and every other conceivable notion to do with Thomas Denning's "The purpose of a court in a civilized society is the vindication of men's rights and the enforcement of just causes.". But, somehow, Mark's CHALLENGE has brought about a possibly different response. As you can see, Mark's CHALLENGE was "RECEIVED" on 12 September 2011 and the "NOTICE OF LISTING" for the "Application lodged by Applicant - Challenge to the jurisdiction of the court" was issued by the Registrar, is dated 13 September 2011, and was in Mark's letterbox, yesterday. It "is listed for Mention on 23/09/2011 at 09:30 AM, District Court - Crime, Parramatta" ... which is 8 George Street, Parramatta, NSW 2150.

It will start off in Courtroom 1.1 where there is usually a "Judge" named Sides (or is it Sidis?... anyway, a skinny bloke with a beard) who "directs traffic" and will pass it on to another "Judge" in one of the other Courtrooms for "disposal". BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THE CHALLENGE DEMANDS.

This CHALLENGE DEMANDS A SPECIAL JURY to deal with this THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE in the history of this country....... COMMON LAW and the SOVEREIGNTY of the PEOPLE. Thomas Jefferson said, "When the People fear the Government, there is Tyranny but, when the Government fear the People, there is Liberty.".

Thomas Jefferson also said, "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”. So, what's going to happen to Mark Flowers on Friday the 23rd of September 2011?

Will the Australian Judiciary acknowledge the Sovereignty of the Australian People, the Rule of Law and our Right to "the lawful judgment of our equals"? And will Friday the 23rd of September 2011 be a landmark day - heralding the return of Magna Carta to is rightful status as "a traditional mandate for trial by jury, justice for all, accountable government and no arbitrary imprisonment", as is inscribed on the Magna Carta Monument in the gardens of Parliament House, Canberra? Whoever can be there at Parramatta, please do so.

LEGAL PAPERS HERE

IF IT AIN'T BROKE - DON'T FIX IT!

BUT THE COURTS OF AUSTRALIA ARE BROKEN, DECAYED & WEAPONS OF THE MASSIVE DESTRUCTION OF TRUTH AND JUSTICE.

Lord Thomas Denning once said: "The purpose of a court in a civilized society is the vindication of men's rights and the enforcement of just causes." .... and what of Magna Carta's: "No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, either dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor pass over him, nor send over him, except by means of the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny of delay Right or Justice."?

A Free Man ought to expect his inalienable Right to Trial by Jury, when he goes to "a place where Justice is administered" (the definition of a "Court").... but not so, in Australia. Nowadays, he is regarded not as "a sovereign human being" but as "a person whose consent is immaterial" (the definition of a "Slave"). Therefore, Australian Courts are not "Courts of Justice" but "Courts of Slavery" ........ because, if a Man is not a Free Man, of Magna Carta standing, then he is a Slave. What, then, of the inscription at the Magna Carta Monument on Parliament Hill in Canberra that says "Magna carta is now seen as a traditional mandate for trial by jury, justice for all, accountable government and no arbitrary imprisonment."?

The intolerable Star Chamber Courts of 17th century England needed the Habeas Corpus Act of 1641 to abolish those places of iniquity. The Courts of Slavery of today's Australia are far more sinister than those pommie Star Chamber Courts. Here is just one example - (but the full horror of the countless numbers of victims from Australian Courts beggars the imagination): When an Australian farmer is arrested by Australian Police for trying to stop a mining corporation mining his Fee Simple property, and is taken to an Australian Court, that Australian farmers is denied his inalienable Right to the lawful judgment of a Jury of his Equals .... the end result is: the wrongs of the mining corporation are protected and the Rights of the Free Man are extinguished.

Sir William Blackstone said, "In all tyrannical governments the supreme magistracy, or the right both of making and of enforcing the laws, is vested in one and the same man, or one and the same body of men; and wherever these two powers are united together, there can be no public liberty." ..... he also said "And, lastly, to vindicate these rights, when actually violated and attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and parliament for redress of grievances; and, lastly, to the right of having and using arms for self preservation and defence."

LIBERTY and SLAVERY are antonyms/opposites .... one is either a FREE MAN or he is a SLAVE.

WITHOUT THE INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF A FREE MAN, A MAN IS NOT A FREE MAN ... HE IS A SLAVE. AUSTRALIAN COURTS ARE COURTS OF SLAVERY.

It's time to shake off the apathy ... time to see things as they are ....... time to RECLAIM OUR COURTS. ....... SO:-

COME ONE! COME ALL!

TO: the COMMON LAW GET-TOGETHER

AT: the MOOT COURT building of the School of Law,
University of Western Sydney,
Victoria Road, Parramatta, NSW 2150

TIME: 10:00 AM till 1:00 PM

DATE: Saturday, 10th September, 2011.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

MORE ON AUSTRALIA HERE

ONE BIT OF GOOD NEWS AS 'COVERT' IS WHAT THE KGB HAS LONG BEEN ACCUSED OF.

Facebook has proven to be one of the biggest dangers in keeping undercover police officers safe due to applications such as facial recognition and photo tagging, according to a adjunct professor at ANU and Charles Sturt University.

Mick Keelty, a former Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner, told the audience at Security 2011 in Sydney that because of the convergence of a number of technologies including biometrics, undercover policing may be "impossible" in the future.

He explained that were safety risks associated with undercover policing if people could be identified online. “You can’t just immerse an officer into a crime group; it takes up to seven years to get them into the right place [in the gang] where they can feed back the intelligence that you need," Keelty said. "Than there is the cost of doing that such as when the AFP targets motorcycle gangs or when governments across the world have entered into agreements to place critical witnesses in prosecution matters in different parts of the world to hide them.” Keelty is currently undertaking research into the policy implications of social networking for covert operations by police and security agencies. He shared findings from a social networking survey conducted with the NSW Police, the AFP and other security agencies from December 2010 to February 2011.

"We surveyed them to try and measure the extent of exposure they already had in having their photos uploaded to the internet," he said. "The results found that 90 per cent of female officers were using social media compared with 81 per cent of males." The most popular site was Facebook, followed by Twitter. Forty seven per cent of those surveyed used social networking sites daily while another 24 per cent used them weekly. All respondents aged 26 years or younger had uploaded photos of themselves onto the internet.

“The thinking we had with this result means that the 16-year-olds of today who might become officers in the future have already been exposed. "It’s too late [for them to take it down] because once it’s uploaded, it’s there forever.” Of the people surveyed, 85 per cent had their photos uploaded on to the internet by another person.

Keelty said that until recently this has been a real problem because Facebook refused to remove photographs, but because of competition from Google+ it had started to remove photos at people’s request. Alarmingly, 42 percent of respondents said it would be possible to identify their relationship with other people, including family and friends. "If you have someone in the service who is trying to remain anonymous for whatever reason, it is still possible through other relationships to find them," Keelty said.

The results of the survey would be used to inform future policy guidelines within both state and federal police agencies.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

We need to build the Membership numbers for the Australian Common Law Party ... a minimum of 600 for registration to go onto the ballot paper for the next Federal Election. This morning, I will post an Introduction Kit to the Members we already have to encourage them to spread the word. The included covering letter is attached to this email.... I hope you like the letterhead.

By the way, I made the effort to look in at the office of "GetUp" (the "independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group") at Level 5, 116 Kippax Street, Sydney, where I spoke to a female with numerous gold rings puncturing various parts of her face. I left her with a few leaflets regarding Trial by Jury and asked her to send me something as to their position on this Common Law Right. I will be most surprised if there is any response from them. The "GetUp" office was most impressive ... obviously this is an organization with very considerable financial backing and no shortage of up-to-date electronic whizz-bangery to conduct their "independent, not-for-profit community campaigning" promoting the Carbon Tax, gay marriages, etc., etc.

Boy! if I had a fraction of the resources "GetUp" has, the Australian Common Law Party would be all over Australia in a heart beat.

John Wilson.
Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY BEGINNINGS

Yes, my friend, in Australian Courts, you are a SLAVE in the eyes of Australian Judges, Magistrates and Registrars.

The question is: "Are you just going to surrender?"

The words of "The Hon. Justice" Michael Frederick Adams of the Supreme Court of New South Wales reverberate in every Court in Australia. "The Hon. Justice" Michael Frederick Adams of the Supreme Court of New South Wales told John Peter Bauskis on 4 August 2006, "Your consent is immaterial." A Slave is a person whose consent is immaterial..... whereas a Free Man's consent is not only material but essential for the protection of his laws and liberties.

To a Free Man, Australia is a Common Law Jurisdiction and all the Courts of Australia are Common Law Courts where he can exercise his inalienable Right to Trial by Jury. However, in the eyes of the Australian Judiciary, Australians have no Common Law Rights and had better do what they are told or else they will set the Police and Sheriffs on them..... and, if you don't believe that, then step inside an Australian Court and see what happens to you is should dare to say, "Australia is a Common Law Jurisdiction and I demand my inalienable Common Law Right to Trial by Jury!" (or anything else your thought went with being Free Man and a Sovereign Human Being). The Australian Judiciary regard themselves as having absolute power over Australians who enter Australian Courts.

This is evidenced, yet again, by the repeated rejection of duly executed Powers of Attorney. When an Australia consents to grant the power to someone else to represent him in Court, THAT IS THEIR WILL. That consent can not be disregarded or rejected by any other means than by the lawful Judgment of a Jury. But Court Officers are constantly overruling this consent.

If it is the will and consent of a Free Man that he has someone represent himself in Court .... and his appointed representative is rejected ..... Common Law has ceased to exist in our Courts. Similarly, we have the situation with having a "Mackenzie's Friend", ie: to have someone else stand with him in Court to advise him and speak to the Court. This, again, is the will of a Free Man to have this happen..... but you have to ask permission from some Judge or Magistrate for someone to be able to help you....???????.

The very fact that a Free Man has to get "leave" from a Judge or a Magistrate... and even a Registrar .... to be able to Subpoena witnesses or documents, is proof positive (yet again) that, if you think you are a Free Man when you enter an Australian Court or even the Registry of an Australian Court, you cease to be one. "leave" is "liberty" (eg: a sailor gets leave from his ship to visit his dying grandmother). You have to ask for "leave" for everything under the sun from these persons who decide whether they will allow you to do something which you regard as being your Right to do so.

And what is the GREATEST insult of all?????

YOU HAVE TO ASK FOR PERMISSION TO HAVE TRIAL BY JURY

.... and these cretins, traitors, imbeciles, thugs, bullies get away with it - because PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THE LAW.....REAL LAW. AND it's going to continue that way UNTIL WE SMASH ADMIRALTY LAW. How do we do that?....... WE OVERRULE IT WITH COMMON LAW.

The situation is far worse than the STAR CHAMBER COURTS that were abolished in 1641. We have COURTS OF SHEER AND UTTER TREASON ..... with THIEVING BANKS destroying anyone who gets in their way. You talk about the Bill of Rights 1689 slamming those "evil counsellors, judges and ministers"(?) ........ those "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" were amateurs compared to the "snakes and sons of snakes" that pollute OUR COURTS, today.

ASK FOR "LEAVE" FROM THEM?????..... NO WAY! It's THEY WHO HAVE TO ASK FOR MERCY FROM US!!!

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

PS: Attached is your TRUMP CARD, ie: the PUBLIC NOTICE, that you must serve on these characters and read aloud IN COURT

'Collar bomb was a very, very elaborate hoax by intruder': Police say no explosives found

Election Now 2011 No Carbon Tax National Rally Canberra – 16 August 2011

Coalition of Industries Convoy of No Confidence – 17 to 22 August 2011

You will all be aware that 2 massive Rallies are planned for August 16 & 22 2011, at Parliament House Canberra. Although the focus is on the Carbon Tax, these rallies are now representing the fierce anger in the Australian community.

This is the start of the People’s revolution against

• Governments that no longer listen to US
• Government that discriminate against the free-born Australian men & women who built this country with their hardwork
• Government that worships atheism, pagan & green religions to our Christian common law heritage.
• Governments that play evil games with our money and our rights
• Government that are selling US out to corporations and international cartels
• Government that borrows money to give to another country and expects us to pay it back
• Government that allows men & women in this country to fear for their future, yet bends over backwards to create a better future for illegal immigrants
• Government that WE vote in who then believe they are superior to US
• Governments that are ruling outside of OUR constitutional contract
• Government that have created a republic without asking for OUR permission & against our referendum votes
• Governments that operate without OUR agreement and don’t care

The only power any government in Australia holds is through our agreement –

• when we decide we can’t be bothered to worry about what they are doing
• when we prefer not to lose a day’s pay by protesting
• when we state that we voted them in to look after us
• when we whinge that its too complicated to understand
• whatever, whatever, whatever

they win! Government use They enforce their rules with

• deception NOT truth * police
• lies NOT truth * courts
• manipulation NOT truth * bankruptcy
• fear NOT truth * multitude of legislation
• false advertising NOT truth * legal talk
• misdirection NOT truth * multiple tiers of bureaucracy all to “persuade” you and I to “agree” with them

Good people – these planned rallies are where we stop agreeing, stop asking and stop begging. We now say -

• LISTEN TO US * WE ARE YOUR BOSSES
• HEAR WHAT WE ARE SAYING * RESPECT US
• DO AS YOU ARE TOLD * DO IT NOW

Good, decent, hard-working Australian, living, breathing men and women from every state in this great country are rallying on those days at that time and in that place. Ecclesiastes 3:1 – “To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven…”

THIS IS OUR TIME.
WE, THE PEOPLE CREATED A GOVERNMENT IN 1901 THAT NO LONGER EXISTS.
That government worked FOR the men and women, both native and free-born.

WE WANT THAT GOVERNMENT BACK.

This Labor government answers only to a minority party that has the stated aim of destroying business in this country – if they succeed, how will you eat, how will you pay your bills, how will you survive? This Labor government swaps its leaders without any reference to the People – if they do that to each other, what makes you think they

have any loyalty to you? This Labor government bribes politicians to vote for it with massive hand-outs that benefit one community at the expense of all others – where is the equality in that? This Labor government has a person called the Prime Minister who tells the men and women of Australia that he or she has a plan that we must bow to – our vote was for them to administer OUR plan only. Get behind these rallies in Canberra – it will be difficult for many, many people but then so will the poverty government are wanting to inflict on us through their measures.

Make your voice heard – it will cost you time and money – but then all you will have is time if this country folds. Stand up as a free-born men or woman, capable of making adult choices – or remain as a child under the care of the government nanny, asking permission for element of your life.

And never forget – governments since 1973 knew exactly what they were doing when they created the awful mess we the men and women now find besetting us. Do not just give ANY of them your trust, make them earn it. Ecclesiastes 3:6 A time to gain, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to throw away.

THIS IS YOUR TIME…GATHER YOUR COURAGE AND RISE UP

Ecclesiastes 3:7 A time to keep silence, And a time to speak

IT IS TIME OUR VOICES WERE HEARD – WE ARE NOT WHISPERING – WE ARE ROARIN

G – AND WE WILL KEEP ROARING! Join all the magnificent men and women who are doing just that.

CATA – contact HERE for bus timetables and details – scheduled for 16 August 2011. – they suggest everyone wear black as a symbol. Convoy of No Confidence – ) contact Mick Patel and Cate Stuart HERE(God bless them) scheduled for 22 August 2011 – the convoys carry different coloured ribbons & balloons which towns on the routes will copy.

My suggestion – we are bleeding – the corporate governments are squeezing the heart out of our country. A country is just dirt without its heart – the living, breathing men and women. We build the economic structure with our labour. We build the lifestyle with our creativity. We build community with our mateship. We are the heart. Wear a red ribbon to show you will shed no more blood for this government. Keep wearing it until every politician learns to obey our commands.

Dear precious Father God – in the mighty name of your Son Jesus Christ – bless the people, fill them with courage and honour their righteousness.

MORE AUSTRALIAN NEWS HERE

ABSOLUTE , UTTER BLOODY LEGEND JOHN. If most Australians realized who John is and what he stands for there would be bronze statues of him? everywhere. Look at them blush - they know Australians are waking up! THIEVES - YOUR TIME IS COMING!!!!!! OzTrackDays 7 months ago

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

"JURY OUT ON JUDGE TRIALS" was the front page of yesterday's Australia's Daily Telegraph with "noble" protestations from the legal profession and the media..... but that's the way the game is played, ie: evil is done and there are token noises made to fool People that these "pillars of society" are going to do something about it ..... BUT, of course, NOTHING will happen and we are taken further down the path to that NEW WORLD ORDER of de-humanization, dispossession and subjugation which NONE DARE CALL IT SLAVERY.

Here is the link for the story: HERE ....... and attached are the words to the story.

So, how do we really DEFEND LIBERTY?

Where do we stand with Ed Howdershelt's 4 boxes?.... specifically: "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Yesterday afternoon and last night, I went to 2 rallies (both, 1st box stuff) - one at the Parramatta Leagues Club where the rally was to protest against imposing licences on People to gamble... and the other at the Leichhardt Town Hall against Coal Seal Gas.

It was dead obvious that this method has been taken over by our enemies (whether they know they are our enemies or not) who say "Trust Me. Follow Me. We will see that things change."... and pigs might fly!

Then we have the 2nd box of voting "representatives" into "Government" .... but, again , that's gone by the boards because that's where all the skulduggeried rotten laws come from.

And the 3rd box????... when we get there, "You don't have any right to trial by jury" and "Your consent is immaterial." is what our enemies shout in our faces.

The 4th box????.... NOT INTERESTED because of 2 reasons... "Thou shalt not kill" and, if we do foolishly resort to violence, our enemies would love the excuse to wipe us out, once and for all.

HOWEVER, that doesn't mean we give up on any of the 3 BOXES.........no, no, no,no....... we get right back in there with, most definitely, the most important one being the 3RD BOX. Below is a PLAN OF ACTION to be taken in the Courts. Please, have a read and, I sincerely hope , do you copying-and-pasting to make up your own documents based upon what you see.

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

CLAIMING COMMON LAW PROCESS IN AUSTRALIA

Jury out on judge trials in Australia (masonic tyranny at work)

Derryn ( hinch@hinch.net ) Hinch's famous catch-phrase, "Shame. Shame. Shame.", has been silenced by the Australian Judiciary.

However, we ought to be saying, "Shame. Shame. Shame." to the Australian Judiciary because it is they who are guilty of the greater wrong. Here is the story that appeared in the Daily Telegraph, last week, that accompanied a photo of Derryn with the caption, "Ordeal: An exhausted Derryn Hinch slumps into his car after receiving his sentence yesterday":

Suffering in silence for Hinch’s sins – Evonne Barry.

DERRYN Hinch will not be able to visit his wife's apartment — just 10 floors from his own — under the strict conditions of his home detention. Hinch, who underwent a liver transplant two weeks ago, was sentenced yesterday after earlier pleading guilty to four charges of deliberately breaching suppression orders prohibiting the identification of sex offenders. Magistrate Charlie Rozencwajg sentenced Hinch to five months home detention, imposing strict conditions on what he can say and who he can talk to. Talkback host Hinch and Chanel, his wife of five years, live separately in the same Melbourne apartment block.

"Chanel will be free to come and go but Derryn will not be able to visit Chanel in her apartment," Hinch’s lawyer Nicholas Pullen said, adding that a clearly defined perimeter and electronic security anklet were part of the detention. Derryn's ends at the lifts on his floor, just past his front door. That's when the anklet goes off." Hinch, 67, was also ordered to not engage in gainful employment, not communicate via the internet, email or any social networking service such as Facebook or Twitter, not publish in any manner in any media, not grant interviews and not cause others to act in a manner that would contravene these conditions. Mr Pullen said twice-weekly hospital visits were already cleared with authorities, and there would be no barriers to seeking extra medical attention when needed.

What is the greater wrong committed by the Australian Judiciary? Their wrong is that of disregarding the Will of the Australian People. In 1988 a Referendum to alter the Australian Constitution to exclude the offence of Contempt of Court from Trial by Jury was resoundingly defeated by the Australian voters - and yet, the Australian Judiciary continue to arbitrarily charge, try and punish "contemnors".

Of course, the wrongs of the Australian Judiciary does not end there ....... but one email could not possibly do justice to that situation. As for the once-outspoken crusading multi-media journalist ......... has he finally succumbed to the "evil counsellors, judges and ministers"? But there is a far greater question facing the People of Australia ........ when will they wake up to the fact that they getting the "Mushroom Treatment" and, as a result, the Banks and the Judges continue to get away with their thieving ways?

And so, my friends, the unlawful punishment of Derryn Hinch is important ....... along with all the other and innumerable injustices heaped upon us, individually and as a nation, at the hands of the Banks and Judges. We have the laws. We have the sovereignty. We now have the Australian Common Law Party (Membership form is attached to this email).

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

ARTICLE HERE

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Attached is a fax of a letter John Bauskis has just received from the NSW Supreme Court and from Stephen Jupp who has signed the letter as the "Manager, Court Services and Prothonotary"... but, if you look on the NSW Supreme Court website and go to "Judicial Officer Contact Details", you will see his title is "Prothonotary & Manager, Court Services & Admiralty Marshall". The Admiralty Marshal says, " I have now had an opportunity to review your "white folder" which includes your draft notice.The documents in your white folder confirm what I had thought, namely that your proposed appeal is without merit and will be futile. The merits of an appeal are a relevant consideration in exercising the discretion to postpone the filing fee. I confirm the decision of Registrar Riznyczok refusing to waive or postpone the fee.You may of course file your documents, but the relevant fee must be paid. I return your white folder with this letter."

The fee for filing the Notice of Intention to Appeal was $256-00 and that was postponed for John when he filed that document. Now, because John has completed the 6 copies of the "White Folder" with all the work that went into them, the "filing fee in proceedings in which a notice of intention to appeal has been filed", ie: $2751-00, is being demanded by Stephen Jupp. "Prothonotary" is "the title given to an officer who officiates as principal clerk of some courts. In the ecclesiastical law, the name of prothonotary is given to an officer of the court of Rome, he is so called because he is the first notary". "Admiralty" is "the name of a jurisdiction which takes cognizance of suits or actions which arise in consequence of acts done upon or relating to the sea; or, in other words, of all transactions and proceedings relative to commerce and navigation, and to damages or injuries upon the sea."

A "Marshal" is "(In England) an officer, usually a junior barrister, who accompanies a judge on circuit and performs miscellaneous secretarial duties. (In the U.S.) a Federal court officer assigned to a judicial district whose functions are similar to those of a sheriff." It is also the title of "Manager" which deserves close analysis. I have had discussions with Registry personnel who have said they refer prospective filings to their "Team Manager" who has directed them not to accept the documents .... and even had letters from the Australian Federal Police saying much the same thing, ie: that their "Team Manager" has reviewed my complaint and has decided not to investigate a situation. So, here we have the Principal Clerk in an Australian Court making a Judgment, as if he is the Captain of a ship with a Free Man nothing more than a member of his crew.

In Australia, we are a Common Law Jurisdiction where Free Men have the inalienable Right to the lawful Judgment of a Jury of their equals... and also where "To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice" (Magna Carta, of course). It is an irrefutable fact that Australian Judges act without Jurisdiction ........ and now we have Clerks and Book-keepers doling out Judgments .... not to mention Police Officers in Police Stations acting as Courts to order arrests and to grant or refuse Bail..... and not forgetting how other Statutory Entities (such as the State Debt Recovery Office) impose Judgments, etc., etc., etc. How has all this been allowed to develop?..... because ordinary People are deliberately kept ignorant as to their Rights and Laws.

There must be a LAWFUL REBELLION in the most rational and civilized way.......EDUCATE! EDUCATE! EDUCATE! Lord Thomas Denning said, "The purpose of a court in a civilized society is the vindication of men's rights and the enforcement of just causes.".... and that's all we want..... we simply want to be able to go to an Australian Court with our grievances and receive nothing more than that "vindication" and "enforcement". John Bauskis still wants to pursue his Appeal........ but $2751-00???...... the Team Manager on the 5th Floor of the Law Courts Building, Queen's Square, Sydney, has made his ruling.

We continually hold out hope that there will be a break-through and, somewhere along the line, a Judge will "do right to all manner of people without fear or favour, affection or ill-will".

Yours sincerely,John Wilson Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

How is that for the definition of a slave?

It pretty-well nails it, doesn't it?!

A FREE MAN has Rights as to his Life, Liberty, Property and Pursuit of Happiness. Where this becomes crucial is when any of these concerns are brought into Court. When a country is under COMMON LAW JURISDICTION then a FREE MAN has the inalienable Right to TRIAL BY JURY and his CONSENT is required for the action to be determined by any other means.

But, in Australia (supposedly a COMMON LAW country) your CONSENT to be without a JURY is IMMATERIAL and, therefore, anyone who sees himself as a FREE MAN under a system of COMMON LAW is, in fact, a SLAVE under ADMIRALTY LAW, ie: the Law of the Sea - as opposed to the Law of the Land (ie: "legem terrae" of Magna Carta).

If anyone doubts this situation, then I refer to the NSW Supreme Court Transcript for Friday 4 August 2006, "IN THE MATTER OF A CHARGE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT AGAINST PETER RUTHERFORD AND JOHN BAUSKIS" when a NSW Supreme Court Judge, Michael Frederick Adams, was judging the charge he had brought against these two Freedom Fighters because they wore T-shirts, into "his" Court, saying "TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY" a week earlier. In the verbal exchanges between Peter Rutherford, John Bauskis and Michael Adams, Peter said, "We are challenging the jurisdiction of the court." - "HIS HONOUR" said, "Upon what basis?" - Peter said, "We have not given our consent." - "HIS HONOUR" said, "Consent is immaterial. The matter does not depend upon the consent of the contemners. Are there any other applications, or can we proceed?" - John then said, "You cannot proceed. we have not given our consent to be without a jury.", - and then "HIS HONOUR" said, "I have said your consent is immaterial. The matter is ruled upon. That is the end of it."

"That is the end of it"??????...... NO, I DON'T THINK SO!!!! But that is how the BANKS and the JUDGES want AUSTRALIA to be RULED...... BY THEM + WITH US AS SLAVES.

"No free man shall be taken..... (etc)...." ....... whereas a slave is a person whose consent is immaterial. So, there you have it.......... FREE MAN OR SLAVE??????

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

ENSURING GOVERNMENT IS:

1. OF THE PEOPLE,

2. BY THE PEOPLE, &

3. FOR THE PEOPLE.

BECAUSE:

LIBERTY STILL MATTERS

***
WHAT IS COMMON LAW?

COMMON LAW IS THE LAW OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE.

***

WHO MAKES COMMON LAW?

COMMON LAW IS MADE BY THE UNANIMOUS JUDGMENTS OF JURIES OF 12 FREE MEN AND WOMEN WHO JUDGE THE FACTS AND THE LAWS PRESENTED TO THEM IN ORDER THAT THEY CAN ADMINISTER JUSTICE.

***

The

AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY

says:-

WE THE PEOPLE ARE FREE MEN.

***

WE NEVER, NEVER, NEVER WILL BE SLAVES.

***

SOVEREIGNTY IS OURS.

***

AUSTRALIA IS A COMMON LAW JURISDICTION.

***

NO MORE ADMIRALTY LAW IN OUR COURTS.

AUSTRALIAN COURTS ARE OUR COURTS.

***

AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTS ARE OUR PARLIAMENTS.

JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS.

***

THIS LAND IS OUR LAND.

THESE LIVES ARE OUR LIVES.

***

COMMON LAW RULES.

***

“YOU’VE GOT TO BE IN IT - TO WIN IT.”

***

AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY

“If the people do not know how to govern themselves, then educate them.” – Thomas Jefferson.

To educate a nation takes a lot of resources. We need to make DVDs and publish literature from primers to theses. We need to place advertisements in newspapers, magazines and on the television and radio. We need to convene seminars and talk to community groups. We need to travel the countryside in a mobile information center and visit areas where people feel left out. We need to organize rallies when occasions call for public awareness to pressing issues. We need to put our money where our mouth is.We need contributions from any and every direction - from people who love life in Australian and want to see everyone given a “fair go”.

SUPPORT & FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS:

Firstly, there’s no better way to pitch in than to join the Party.

Secondly, spread the word that the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY is now upon the scene.

Thirdly, send donations to the BENDIGO BANK, 198 Macquarie Street, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia, where our account is:

Account name: AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY.

BSB: 633-000 and Account number:143521896.

For overseas deposits SWIFT No./Code: BENDAU 3B

***

Yours sincerely,

John Wilson.

Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

FREE MAN OR SLAVE

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

John Bauskis ( siksua@gmail.com ) has the AUSTRALIAN JUDICIARY RUNNING SCARED.

Today he tried to file properly prepared White Folders into the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales against a judgment in the Supreme Court made by a single judge throwing out John's Indictment against another Supreme Court judge who declared John to be a "Vexatious Litigant". Of course, John demanded his Common Law Right to Trial by Jury ... and that, typically, was disregarded.

What makes this case additionally significant is the fact that John's Summary of Argument totally destroys the practice of declaring anyone a "Vexatious Litigant" ... and this applies to many, many People who have had their Human, Civil & Political Rights taken from them by this abomination. The Australian Judiciary are running scared because all these disenfranchised People are entitled, not only to full restoration of their Rights, but huge compensation .... plus, the so-called judges who did the deed will be prosecuted and punished.

The uniqueness of John's position is that John's name was removed from the List of Vexatious Litigant, a little while back, to try to cloud, cover up and make out that John has no grounds for his action..... BUT we downloaded and printed the List of Vexatious Litigants before they changed the List ... and so, we have the evidence well-and-truly in the court documents.

The Australian Judiciary are notoriously corrupt and treasonous ... and this ploy of closing down our Common Law Courts and substituting diabolical Admiralty Law, at the same time as violating all International and Australian Laws and Covenants by outlawing dissidents who stand up against them, is exposed by John's Summary of Argument.

In that Summary of Argument, he cites (amongst the traditional citings of Magna Carta 1215, Habeas Corpus 1641, Petition of Right 1627 and Bill of Rights 1689 - which have long-protected our Rights) two particularly pertinent Australian Laws, which are as follows: A. In Section 11 of the Tasmanian Criminal Code Act 1924, it says: “Outlawry, attaint, and forfeiture abolished. (1) After the passing of this Act no proceedings in outlawry shall be taken, and no judgment of outlawry shall be pronounced, against any person. (2) No confession, verdict, inquest, conviction, or judgment of any treason, felony, or other crime, shall hereafter cause any attainder or corruption of blood or any forfeiture or escheat other than any fine or penalty imposed by the sentence of the Court”; and B. The Free Access to Courts Act 1400 2 Hen 4 c 1 (Australian Capital Territory) that says: “4. Every person shall be in peace. All his liege people and subjects may freely and peacefully, in his sure and quiet protection, go and come to his courts, to pursue the laws, or defend the same, without disturbance or impediment of any. 5. Full justice shall be done. Full justice and right be done, as well to the poor as to the rich, in his courts aforesaid,” .

So, you see, this blows the "Vexatious Litigant" rubbish out of the water (to use a naval expression) and all the People upon whom these evil and stupid so-called judges have done the dirty ought to rally behind John Bauskis. As John's email tells, they are trying desperately to stop him. The evil cretins have shot themselves in the foot because they can't even use the tactic of refusing John permission to file his Appeal as they do to me... because they are making out that John's name is not on the list of

"Vexatious Litigants"... which, incidentally for NSW, has the following names:"Individuals considered vexatious under s84 of the Supreme Court Act 1970:

Bar-Mordecai,
Michael Jacob; Betts,
Craig Andrew; Bhattacharya,
Pranay Kumar; Caldar,
Russell (also known as Russell Graham Gittoes); Gittoes,
Russell Graham (also known as Russell Caldar);Jambrecina,
Drago; Kanak,
Dominic Wy; Spautz,
Michael Edward; Tsekouras,
Con; West,
Raymond Stanley; Witt,
Frank Raleigh”….

and “Individuals involved in vexatious proceedings under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008:
Croker, Clayton Robert; Fleet,
Robert; Fokas,
Maria; Gargan,
Peter Alexander; Klewer,
Lucy Patricia;
Wilson, John."

They are trying to stop John by demanding that he pay the $2,751-00 fee up front. He is a pensioner and gets a waiver/postponement of fees for anything else.... but they want $2,751-00 before they will accept his White Folders. They think they have John stumped by this financial rip-off .... BUT.... what about those other People on that list above????????????.......surely one of them will come up with the money for him?????????........they will get their money back and be helping themselves infinitely MORE.

Let's consider what this "Vexatious Litigant" ruse is all about... and I see that Peter Gargan has now been declared an Outlaw ...... why Peter?.... Peter has been trying to fight for Justice in the Courts using Chapter III of the Australian Constitution as his main theme - and, legally, has is 100% correct ... and obviously too correct for the fraudulent, lying, corrupt and traitorous judges ... so, now Peter has joined the likes of Brian Shaw and myself as "persona non gratis" according to the "ratbag profession" (Brett Dawson wrote a book called, "The Evil Deeds of the Ratbag Profession"). So, they are using this farcical "Act of Parliament" (which shows how rotten the Parliaments are) to try to shut us down.

But that's NOT going to happen ... especially as the new AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY has entered the arena. So, come on, give John Bauskis the folding stuff and we won't just embarrass the hell out of this scum .... we're going to annihilate them!

Please read John's email below.

Yours sincerely,John Wilson.
Chairman, Australian Common Law Party

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/pdf/Free%20Man%20or%20Slave001.pdf

***

Dear John,

Just to let you know the latest issues with the Supreme Court, I went to the Supreme Court to file my six copies of the white folders re: my appeal to the appeals court against George Alfred Palmer, a supreme court judge, (Who made me a Vexatious Litigant,) So I took a Summons out on him, the registrars refused to let me file the summons, so with the help of a duty judge (Judge Schmidt J ) I had to get he permission, which I eventually did get. Then the fun began, I sued Palmer for depriving me my right to liberty and justice, and the State of New South Wales as they are vicariously liable, and a jury to award me one million Australian Dollars.

I served the summonses ( one for Palmer and one for the Crown Solicitor ) on the Crown Solicitor, at the first mention the Crown solicitor complained about my serving him with 2 Summonses, he made me serve Palmer personally, which I did, next mention the registrar said I dad to apply for a Jury, which I did, at the hearing before judge James B M, he dismissed the hole thing, than got in front of judge Hislop J who got very upset with me because I wouldn't appeal against James' decision and kept telling him he has no Jurisdiction to do anything, and as I had filed the Summons in the supreme court Common Law division under criminal jurisdiction and Hislop was moving it into civil, thus claiming judge immunity, with the help of the Crown Solicitor, than in May Hislop got upset again as I wrote him a letter (through the Courts ) outlining my case and how the judge was diverting the whole case away from the original charge, and I seek a remedy,

1. My name to be removed from the "Vexatious Litigant" registrar. 2. Compensation for the damage done to me, of $500,000.00 . I also asked to see him in his chambers, ex parte, which he refused. so we went to court again and he over ruled every thing and dismissed the case with costs against me, I straight away filed a Notice of intention to appeal, so this is were we are now. Today on filling these folder I filled out the waiver of fees form, as I have done all along, but this time they refused me, (they know that if this case goes forward the judge is in trouble) so I went up to see a duty Judge, it turned out it was Judge Schmidt J. but this time she was not helpful at all, and didn't want to do anything, she said I have 2 options 1. pay the fees 2. or write a letter to the chief Registrar to overturn this registrars decision (fat chance of that happening) so I went back downstairs to apply for a transcript, filled out waiver of fees and ordered the transcript, no problem, while at the desk with the transcript I asked the girl what are the filling fees for the white folders, she told me $2751.00 Well as I am a pensioner I can't pay that amount, so John can you put out an appeal for help in this matter. My phone no is 0411038417 and bank details are: Name of a/c John P Bauskis Bank of Queensland BSB 122746 a/c no. 20624790 my email address is: siksua@gmail.com

Regards John P Bauskis

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

Firstly, the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY formally came upon the scene on Monday night at the Blacktown Workers' Club....."born on the 4th of July", one might say. It was a good-hearted gathering of hard-core troops ... only some 15 bods, but quality through-and-through. There was lively discussion with Mick Gallagher, in good form, calling the play.

After almost 3 hours, the necessaries were performed and I am was elected "Chairman of the Party", with Mick as "Secretary" and my son, Anthony, as "Treasurer" .... with the rest of the crew as "Members of the Committee". We agreed that a bank account should be entered into at the Bendigo Bank and, when Mick comes up with the required "Minutes of the Meeting", that will happen. The majority of discussion was about the "Aims and Objectives of the Party" (which I had drafted beforehand) and wordings added, to the satisfaction of all present. The "Aims and Objectives" now reads as follows:

"3.1 To ensure that the Commonwealth of Australia is and continues to remain a Common Law Jurisdiction with Sovereignty belonging to the Australian People who will always be able to exercise their inalienable Right to Trial by Jury in Australian Courts for the administration of Justice, the advancement of Truth, the effective implementation of Democracy and the preservation of Liberty.

3.2 To seek the teaching of the fundamental principles of Common Law throughout the schools and universities of Australia that Common Law is indeed the Law of the People, by the People and for the People.

3.3 To ensure that Grand Juries operate for the investigation of serious offences and of the maladministration of government and the finding of true Bills of Indictment to go to Petit Juries who will judge the facts and the laws presented to them in those particular actions and that Grand and Petiti Juries be unimpeded in their inquisitorial role and the full execution of their authority to question and call for witnesses and to determine the admissibility of evidence.

3.4 To endorse and support candidates for election to all levels of government in Australia to achieve the above Aims and Objectives and ensure that the Parliaments make laws for the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth."

So, we're up and running........ keep those Membership forms coming in!

Secondly, the more one reflects on the abysmal state of our country, the more we need to assert our Sovereignty ... which means COMMON LAW. Just think of all the insanities we are subjected to because of farcical and downright bad Acts of Parliaments, plus all the intentionally mischievous and destructive-to-our-way-of-life mismanagement debacles that are impacting on our families and the security of our nation and economy! Professor Julius Sumner-Miller used to tell us to ask, "Why is it so?" Well, it's pretty damned obvious "Why".

It's because we're stupid..... and lazy... and made to be that way by thems "who owns the gold". "Who owns the gold" owns the media ......and the propaganda they churn out gets carried into our schools by cretins and idiots who big-note themselves to cover-up their own inadequacies........lawyers being at the top of that list. Jesus said, "Woe to you lawyers".... and He was dead right.

The "Aims & Objectives" of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY are directed at one thing and one thing, only.

E-D-U-C-A-T-I-O-N.

Thomas Jefferson said, "If the People don't know how to govern themselves, then E-D-U-C-A-T-E them." We're going to have to have lots and lots of money to do that .... so, we're going to have to hit the PHILANTHROPISTS the same way Larry Dodge did when he got the FULLY INFORMED JURY ASSOCIATION going in America. Does anyone know any PATRIOTIC PHILANTHROPISTS in Australia?????

Finally, "If you don't fight, you lose"......... so, let's shape up!

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY MEMBERSHIP FORM

HOW MASONS ACROSS THE GLOBE ARE THIEVING MENS ASSETS AND HOMES USING DODGY LEGAL MOVES BY THEIR JUDICIAL BROTHERS IN EQUALLY DODGY COURT PROCESS'S. BANKRUPTCY'S ARE HOW THEY CAN ALSO TAKE OVER ANY COMPETITORS BUSINESS'S NOT PART OF THEIR CREEPY NETWORK OF SATANIC POWER.WE HAVE INVESTIGATED THE TRAIL OF BANKRUPTCY'S BACK TO MASONIC THUGS RUNNING THE SHOW BEHIND THE SCENES.

Cry to bank: Don't fence me out

THE repossessed home of a former Sydney businessman has been barricaded by a 2m security fence in an effort by creditors to keep the man off the property. John Babet, who last month staged a seven-hour protest against a Supreme Court order to repossess his Kewarra Beach home over unpaid mortgage debts, says he has the bank scared. The 64-year-old chained himself to his roof as removalists took beds and books from his home.

Mr Babet said he deliberately froze repayments so he could expose the "criminal code" of banks while they took his home. The bank, St George, has also hired a full-time security guard to remain on site in case Mr Babet attempts to enter the property. "St George-Westpac are controlled by the global banking cartel that has deliberately crashed the financial system in a bid to take political control," he said. Mr Babet said he lodged complaints with Cairns Regional Council and the Australian Federal Police. He also said he was preparing legal action against the bank. A St George spokesman said erecting a security fence and hiring a full-time security guard was normal under "these circumstances". "As we have taken possession of the property, it has been fenced within property lines, as is our usual process in circumstances such as these," he said.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

[Not]ice Monday, 4 July, 2011 Directors Westpac Banking Corporation ...

Following the Unlawful auction sale of 72-72A Kewarra St. Kewarra Beach Qld on 30 June 2011 ... Forthwith return all "Chattels"... below listed ... which you Unlawfully stole-hid from me while was chained to the roof during the 7 hour police siege 25 June 2010 ...

INVENTORY- 72 Kewarra St Kewarra Beach Qld

Front Entry Statue - Urns 2 Egyptian - Chinese 2 Wall hangings – footmat
Front Patio Table Timber – 4 timber chairs – umbrella – Stone candle holder

Lounge

Lounge three piece - cushions 5 - acrylic magazine stand- miniature fountain
coffee table glass - side table glass - shells on glass tray - games - cane tray
Kimono Japanese purple silk wall hanging - painted panels 2-
Japanese silk Obe
Utah Gold Alabaster "Eclipse" Radcliffe sculpture on pedestal

Dining

Dining table glass + Chairs cane 6 - Indian cloisonne glass Vase
Table side, glass – Decorative timber platter- glass blown bowl-silk tassel ball
Table timber- TV-DVD-CD digital - timber Chinese urns 2 – Zappers 2
Table timber - Vase Chinese cloisonné- artificial red flowers-Thai porcelain 2
Wall hanging, Indian red Silk Sari - orange silk wall hanging
Turkish silk rug - Chinese rug - Japanese silk Obe wall hanging
Crystal Flame, natures sculpture mounted -

Kitchen - Alcove

Indoor plant-Timber Thai Urn - Timber bowl - glass balls 5 - glass vase -Coffee brewer, Kettle, Toaster, Micro wave, F&P Fridge - Baumatic Cooktop-Oven - Bosch Dishwasher Sandwichmaker, Blender, Crockery/ Cutlery/Glasses /Pots/Pans for 6 people
Timber Table - Balinese timber figurine
Kimono Japanese Red silk wall hanging
Oil painting "Spiritus" by P Fair

Laundry

Bosch Washer – Bosch Dryer - Iron & clothes stands - dolphin print –
happy plant - beach towels for 6 people

Pool
Daybed Throwover - cushions 6- Egyptian Urns 2 -sparkling light strands 2- books
Dining table glass-cane - 4 cane chairs - cushions 4 - side table glass/cane

Bedroom 3 -
ensuite bathroom contents
Single beds 2 large - Canvas chair - Centre table timber - lamp - cane tray
Thai porcelain 2 candle hand, toilet brush- Linen/Towels/ floor mat, soap for two people Wall Hanging Japanese silk Obe - Julienne Oil Paintings 3

Bedroom 2 -
ensuite bathroom contents
Queen bed (unzip to make 2 singles)- Cane bedhead - Japanese Wall hanging - Burmese puppet hanging - Balinese Timber mirror hanging
“-Side tables timber 2 - cane trays 2- lamps 2- canvas chairs 2 - Indian wool rug-ensuite - Thai porcelain 3 - Linen/Towels/ floor mat/soap for two people “Cosmos" paintings by jb 2

Bedroom 1 -
ensuite bathroom contents
King size bed - Charcoal Throw -Bed head timber - Wall hanging Japanese
Side Tables Timber Chinese 2 - lamps 2 "-Linen/Towels/ mat/soap for 2 people Chairs cane 2- cushions 4 - Indian wool rugs 2 Cane table -
Buddha reclining -
Farris Bronze sculpture "Lisa" on pedestal
marble sculpture "Duality” by jb

Beach side - pool side
Lounges Timber, Pool 2 - Buddha statue - Urns 5 Pool area
Cabana - day bed - cushions 2 - CD player - Pool Filter & equipment

INVENTORY - 72A Kewarra St Kewarra Beach Q

Entrance
Sculpture "Atlantis" Radcliffe Bronze
Sculpture Acrylic - Hart "Fidelia"
Oil Painting Huang "Woman in Garden"
Nain Blue Persian Rug 9'x5'


Bedroom 1 -
ensuite bathroom contents
King Bed - cane bed head- Japanese wall hanging
Cane side tables 2 - lamps 2 - 2 cane trays - prints 2 - pedestal fan
Cane table - Thai porcelain/cane tray & bowl canvas chair- vacuum
Ensuite- painted panel -porcelain female figurine & bowl - crystal chess set- - timber bowl - cane tray - timber hand mirror & bowl- Japanese wall hanging- Nain Blue-cream Persian Rug 9'x5' -
Marble sculpture "third eye" by jb
Painted panel "excitement" by jb

Corridor
1.Office - files - prints-maps- certificates - stationery - large photo of "Beloved" 2-3.Cold Weather clothes 4. Travel bags - Amplifiers - misc

Bedroom 2 -

ensuite bathroom contents
Queen bed - Chinese silk bedspread-cane bed head - Japanese wall hanging
Cane side tables 2 - crystal balls 2- glass trays 2 - glass bowls 2 - bali wall hanging - -warm weather clothes -Glass table - crystal collection - - glass vase - Georg Jensen crystal /silver scent bottle - Georg Jensen silver envelope opener – Oils Chinese "4 Seasons" , Chinese script "Love" - glass "shuttle" sculpture Nain Blue-cream Persian Rug 6'x4'-
Paul Helleu Etching "portrait of a lady"
Hart Acrylic sculpture "Fire Bird" on pedestal

Bedroom 3 -

ensuite bathroom contents
Queen bed- cane bed head - Japanese wall hanging - happy plant
Cane side tables 2 - lamps 2 -
Paintings "Inspiration' by jb, 2 panels
Bronze McLain "Illusion" sculpture on pedestal -
Bronze "Angel" sculpture
Paul Helleu Etching "femme au reverie"

Living

Day bed, throw, 6 cushions - floor cushions 2 - side table cane -ceiling drapes
Timber dining table - "Gem" tablecloths 2 -chairs timber 6 - cushions 6 - weather station - TVDVDCD 2 -CD-DVD- Lap top computer - Sony movie camera- Zapper- Printers HP 3 in One, Canon portable- flutes 2- model boat
Burmese bells-dongs-fruit bowl - Baskets 5 - glass vases 2- indoor planter - Boat print - Sydney Harbour Bridge print - Burma print -Thai bowl - dice set glass sea shell - wood scent bottles 2 - spin top, kaleidoscope - Italian glass, Arabian inlaid marble-Turkish harp - Chinese musical balls 2 - glass oil lamp -
Book - CD - DVD Collection including 2 Rare books on "Helleu"
Silver Norwegian belt knives
Painting "Homeward" by jb
Painting "Ectasy" by jb
Crystal chess set
Crystals collection - crystal candle holders 2 -
Japanese porcelain head rest -
German Ammonite Fossil 135 million years

Kitchen

LG Fridge - F&P dishwasher - Omega cook top/oven- Saeco coffee machine -blender -tray- cane bowl - timber wine rack-boat print- 20L filtered water bowl-
high Stool - Pisces fish - Crockery/ Cutlery/Glasses /Pots/Pans for 6 people

Laundry

Washer Electrolux- Dryer Westinghouse- Alps 20L water filter
beach towels for 6 people

Pool

Buddha wood head on bark tree pedestal
Terracotta urns 6
Lounge chairs timber 2
Pool Filter & equipment

Garden

Buddha fountain

Tool Room-

Electric Bench saw-cross cut saw-chain saw- portable saw- wood sculpting saw -drills 2 -jack hammer- planer- router-sander- angle grinder-water blaster

General Ladder- outdoor Blower/vacuum-shovel-sledge hammer-rake-picks 2-pruner 2 -brooms 2

Storage Room

Kayak - Bike - Lawn Mower - Grass edger

On Monday, the 4th of July 2011 at the Blacktown Workers' Club, the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY will be inaugurated for the express purpose of RESTORING TRUE DEMOCRACY.

"If People do not know how to govern themselves, then educate them" - Thomas Jefferson. "People are destroyed for the lack of knowledge" - Hosea 4: 6.

In a TRUE DEMOCRACY, SOVEREIGNTY LIES WITH THE PEOPLE ... and Sovereignty is "the ultimate authority to make and impose laws". That Sovereignty of the People is exercised by way of the unanimous lawful judgments of JURIES, who make COMMON LAW. COURTS ARE GOVERNMENT.... PARLIAMENTS ARE NOT GOVERNMENT ...... and Political Parties, who have control over Members of Parliament, are NOT GOVERNMENT.

The Australian People must be educated to the fact that AUSTRALIA IS A COMMON LAW COUNTRY.... and that they have the POWER to NEGATE any legislation which is UNJUST or INJURIOUS to themselves or to their country. The AIMS & OBJECTIVES of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY are nothing more and nothing less than:

1 To ensure that the Commonwealth of Australia remains a Common Law Jurisdiction with Sovereignty belonging to the Australian People who will always be able to exercise their inalienable Right to Trial by Jury in Australian Courts for the administration of Justice, the advancement of Truth, the effective implementation of Democracy and the preservation of Liberty.

2 To seek the teaching of the fundamental principles of Common Law throughout the schools and universities of Australia that Common Law is indeed the Law of the People, by the People and for the People.

3 To ensure that Grand Juries operate for the investigation of serious offences and of the maladministration of government and the finding of true Bills of Indictment to go to Petit Juries who will judge the facts and the laws presented to them in those particular actions and that Grand and Petiti Juries be unimpeded in their inquisitorial role and the full execution of their authority to question and call for witnesses and to determine the admissibility of evidence. 4 To endorse and support candidates for election to all levels of government in Australia in order to achieve the above Aims and Objectives.

The AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY fervently adheres to the Principles that:

1. Truth is the mother of Justice;

2. Justice is the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs;

3. Freedom is everyone's God-given birthright; and 4. Democracy is the Sovereignty of the People.

NOT the LABOR PARTY, nor the LIBERAL PARTY, nor the GREENS, nor INDEPENDENTS will or can force their will upon the People of Australia, once the People of Australia learn the TRUTH that is DEMOCRACY. The AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY will RETURN AUSTRALIA to the AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE.

- Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

YES ....IT'S A REMINDER:

Remember. Remember the 4th of July... it's the launch of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY.

Did anyone see that scene from "Network"? (a movie with Peter Finch playing the part of a television political journalist) when he called on People to shout out of their windows, "We've had enough and we're not going to take it any more!" Well, as regards the Banks and the Judges stealing, killing and destroying our inalienable COMMON LAW RIGHTS, we've gone beyond complaining and asking our servants to do their duty.

They've proven themselves to be as thick as bricks - and that's giving them an enormous the benefit of the doubt. We the People, ourselves, must take up the Sword of Justice which H.M. Queen Elizabeth the Second was told, when she was crowned in 1953: "that she may not bear the Sword in vain;but may use it as the minister of God for the terror and punishment of evildoers,and for the protection and encouragement of those that do well, through Jesus Christ our Lord" and "With this sword do justice, stop the growth of iniquity, protect the holy Church of God, help and defend widows and orphans, restore the things that are gone to decay, maintain the things that are restored, punish and reform what is amiss, and confirm what is in good order: that doing these things you may be glorious in all virtue; and so faithfully serve our Lord Jesus Christ in this life, that you may reign for ever with him in the life which is to come.Amen.".... but, of course, she has no intention of doing that in her own county - let alone in ours.

Besides, if we can't stand up for ourselves and our families, we're not worth two bob, anyway. And in reality, we don't need any swords or bombs or any evil weapons that would make us no better than the thieves and traitors we're fighting. All we have to do is EXERCISE OUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS.

But, first, we've got to take a leaf out of Thomas Jefferson's Book of Wisdom (where he said, "If the People do not know how to govern themselves, then EDUCATE them.") before we can get to do that. So, we're launching the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY with the Aims and Objectives spelt out in the Party's Constitution (attached from the previous and below email).

On next Monday night, the 4th of July (yes, it's the same day our Americans brothers celebrate the restoration of their COMMON LAW RIGHTS and call it "INDEPENDENCE DAY") at the Blacktown Workers' Club, the meeting will be called to order and I will propose that the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY be formed ... and, if there is a vote in the affirmative, the tedium of installing the nuts and bolts shouldn't take too long, at all. But we need (what I believe is called) a "quorum" of a minimal number of ladies and gentlemen to do the job.

So, if you feel as passionate about this JUST CAUSE as I do, then please roll up on the night.

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

This afternoon, I booked the venue for the Inaugural Meeting of the AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY, when I will ask the good People who make the effort to go, to endorse the most simple of constitutions (attached)...... the "PARTY AIMS & OBJECTIVES" is what the A.C.L.P. is 100% and exclusively about ... so, don't expect a mish mash of "Policies" because we're not going to side-tracked from "the name says it all" focus. The AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY is to re-establish COMMON LAW in AUSTRALIA .. and that means DEMOCRACY.

So, anyone who wants to rabbit on about their pet campaign can just put all that aside for this one night, because all those grievances can ONLY be remedied ONCE COMMON LAW is back as our System of Government... which is to say, OUR COURTS are how WE GOVERN ourselves and our country. The place is the BLACKTOWN WORKERS' CLUB in Blacktown, a western suburb of Sydney.

Blacktown Workers Club Group
55 Campbell Street, Blacktown NSW 2148
T: 02 9830 0673 I F: 02 9830 0654

The date is MONDAY, the 4th of JULY, 2011.

The time is to be 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM.

The room is the Jack Robinson Room.

The Blacktown Workers' Club is a fantastic club and the Buffet is beautiful and cheap ... best to eat there, before the Meeting. The Club is a short walk from Blacktown Railway Station... and there is a huge multi-storied car park with a bridge from the 3rd floor into the Club.

It will be a night that will mark the a re-birth of Freedom from the seeds sown by good Men.

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

MORE ON COMMON LAW PARTY HERE

To: Alan Jones,
c/- Radio 2GB,
Level 1, Building C,
33 - 35 Saunders Street,
Pyrmont, NSW 2001.
Fax: (02) 8570 0219.

Dear Alan,

Regarding your comment, this morning, on the Labor Party's $12 million advertising campaign to promote the "Carbon Tax" to the Australian People: Your remark that, "I'm sorry to tell you that the country is run by liars and fools" has prompted me to send you the leaflets on "Courts are Government" and "Australian Judges are Frauds, Liars, Criminal, Traitors and Fools" plus a copy of a letter I received concerning what happened in the Jury Room In the Parramatta District Court, last year. The last item, re: the Jury Room carryings-on, also relates to a comment by your London fellow radio-journalist, Adam Gilchrist, who spoke of "40% of Jurors in high-profile cases independently sourcing evidence from the Internet in defiance of their instructions from the judge that they aren't allowed to do that.. and then he said, "How can there be a fair trial when Jurors do that?"

Well, Adam Gilchrist, Jurors are not "bound" by what anyone says ... let alone a Judge or Judges who think they can lord it over the People in the Jury. You see: Sovereignty lies with the People.. and Judges and Magistrates are Public Servants who are to do what the Jurors tell them to do... and not the other way round. It is Trial BY Jury... and the Jury is the LAW, ie: they make and impose Common Law after having judged the facts and the laws presented to them or they demand the Judge provides for them for them to consider.

There is a Legal Maxim which says, "Trials ought always to be had where the jury have the best knowledge."........ but these "evil counsellors, judges and ministers endeavouring to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People" (ala Bill of Rights 1689) don't like it when their bubble is burst by the Truth. It is our Common Law Right to have the lawful judgments from our equals whenever we go to Court... and that means ANY Court, eg: Local or District or Supreme or High or Family etc., etc. Unless the Court obtains the clear and unequivocal consent from both parties, eg: Prosecutor and Defendant, the Court has NO jurisdiction to proceed summarily and any awards, doings and proceedings are not to be drawn into consequence or example (Petition of Right 1627), holden for nought (Confirmation of Charters 1297) .... illegal and void.

That includes the Verdict (ie: the Jury's decision that the accused has or has not done wrong and the Sentencing.... because "judgment" means "pronouncing sentence". Therefore, when a Judge dismisses the Jury after they have delivered their Verdict and without their delivering their Judgment, no Sentencing can be performed because the Judge has no jurisdiction to so any such thing .... but they go ahead, any way, which is totally wrong .. in fact, there is another Legal Maxim which says: "A Judge without jurisdiction is to be disobeyed with impunity".... and the ignorant Sheriffs bow and scrape to these bewigged frauds/liars/criminals/traitors/fools.....????? Finally, I'm enclosing the two-page leaflet I've started using to recruit Members for the Australian Common Law Party.... if you want to become a Member, just fill out the Application Form and post it to me.

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

Below is another absolutely ridiculous situation concocted by the idiots in Parliament who are destroying our country. So, whether it's a "Carbon Tax" or a "Speed Camera Rip Off" or "Mandatory Sentencing" or "Fluoridation" or "IMF Contributions" or "On-the-spot Fines" or "Summary Foreclosures" etc., etc., etc..... these buffoons think they can do anything they like and that we're just going to 'cop it'.

Well, wake up, Australia!

Unless we learn and exercise our COMMON LAW RIGHTS, they're going to keep on treating us a IGNORANT SLAVES. The new AUSTRALIAN COMMON LAW PARTY is well on the way to straightening out the whole dodgy mess. I know there are other Parties being put together because they believe certain things ought to be done certain ways...... but that's no better than sticking with the status quo of Labor/Liberal/Greens squabbling for the sake of squabbling with the result of steadily going down the gurgler.

One COMMON LAWMAN in the Senate is all that is required to "keep the bastards honest" (as the late Don Chipp used to say he would do but didn't). One COMMON LAWMAN on his feet in the Senate only has to say, "You can pass all the Acts of Parliament you like. The PEOPLE will judge them and, if they don't like them, they'll exercise their RIGHTFUL SOVEREIGNTY and reject them.". Attached is a draft for a CONSTITUTION for the new party with the AIMS AND OBJECTIVES clearly stated and simplicity, itself ... which are to restore the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY across the nation and in every action in every Court ... and, by that alone, we will triumph over the skulduggery and downright evil the Banks and the Judges have been getting away with.

Also attached is a better MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION form ... there are NO FEES, of course.... so, please print off the form, fill it in and/or get others to do so, and post it back to me at 19 Elm Place, North Rocks, NSW 2151. "If the People don't know how to govern themselves, then educate them" (Thomas Jefferson) is the overriding POLICY... and it can't come soon enough. The Swiss say, "We don't care who is in Parliament, as long as we have Citizens' Initiated Referenda" .... well, what Australians should say is "We don't care who is in Parliament, as long as we have a COMMON LAWMAN in there to keep them in their place."

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

=================================

Locking up Australian fisheries is a crime against humanity

The Australian government is again proving its commitment to green genocide by its move to lock away even more Australian fisheries in “marine parks”, which is intended to reduce our fisheries output, ramp up the price of seafood, and deny the people of Australia and the world an important source of food. “This policy is a calculated crime against humanity,” charged Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood today. “The Commonwealth Government’s plan to establish a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA) by 2012 along with similar State Government schemes, are based on scientific quackery,” he said. “Australia has the lowest fishing harvest rate in the world—about one-thirtieth of the global average—so any claims of overfishing are absurd lies.”

Mr Isherwood pointed out that Thailand, Australia’s largest supplier of seafood imports, harvests 11 times the quantity of Australian fisheries in wild catch and their aquaculture industry is 30 times larger than our own, yet in area Thailand’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is only four per cent that of Australia’s, and its continental shelf area, which provides most of the catch, is 10 times smaller! Even though greenies scream that Thailand’s large harvest rate is overfishing, it has remained near its present level for the past 20 years. The same greenies and successive Australian governments have deliberately sabotaged Australia’s potential to have one of the world’s largest fishing industries. Two-thirds of Australia’s seafood consumption is imported, which costs $1.7 billion per year, yet satellites measuring chlorophyll concentration, which is associated with plankton—fish food—indicate Australian waters show similar potential fishing productivity to other nations.

Australia’s Marine Protected Areas (MPA) already cover 2.2 million square kilometers, which is 38 per cent of the total global protected area. Plans to expand MPAs into the Coral Sea, the Great Australian Bight and other areas will mean Australia alone accounts for one-half of the global total! In addition, fishery quotas, access fees and license fees cost fishing businesses hundreds of thousands of dollars and are crippling the industry—especially (as usual) the small players. On top of this, the same governments which don’t regulate banks and financial speculators, deliberately smother the fishing industry in regulations—size limits, bag limits, boat limits, closed seasons and no-take species—which also serve to cut our food supply. Many Australian fishermen have been driven out of the industry, and too many have been driven to suicide; as the industry shrinks, more are now giving up the struggle to remain viable.

Mr Isherwood continued, “Marine scientist Dr Walter Starck recently stated, ‘In current economic conditions adding more and more ill-conceived restrictions onto our food producers is tantamount to treason in a time of war.’ “And actually, we are in a time of war now—we’re at war with the British Empire, the Queen and her consort Prince Philip and their eco-fascist Green movement. “These Marine Protected Areas have been forced on Australians by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and its Convention on Biological Diversity, which we signed at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. This is the IUCN formed in 1948 by Sir Julian Huxley, a Life Fellow of the British Eugenics Society from 1925 and its President from 1959-62, long after Nazi eugenics was known to be the evil racist pseudoscience that it is. The IUCN’s constitution was written by the British Foreign Office with the intent to further British imperialism under the cover of conservation.

“At the opening of the Rio Earth Summit, the Secretary-General, Maurice Strong posed the question: ‘Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilisations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?’ “Fishing is a hallmark of civilization. As much as anything, it was the development of fishing as a reliable food source that led to civilizations developing along rivers and beside oceans, and allowed the first leap upwards in population growth. This British policy will send us back to the Stone Age. “When considering the large-scale clinical and epidemiological studies showing significant health benefits from increased seafood consumption, it is genocidal to restrict this important food source.”

He concluded, “Australia has the world’s third largest Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) area and as an island continent we have a responsibility to foster a thriving fishing and aquaculture industry that can feed the world. Join us and make that a reality.”

CLC CONSTITUTION HERE

CLC MEMBERSHIP FORM HERE

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

Gavin McPherson, (gavs_email@yahoo.com.au ), has suggested we form a new political party and call it the Australian Common Law Party. I agree.

Attached is a draft for a constitution for our political party. It is basically a copy-and-paste of what appears to be the standard form for that sort of document .. and I have set out the Party Aims and Objectives. We require 500 members to sign the Application to Register a Political Party for House of Representatives and Senate Elections HERE and also attached to this email. So, I would appreciate it if you kind ladies and gentlemen could print off that Application to Register form and ask other good People, who are on the Electoral Roll, to volunteer their Details and Signature and post them back to me at 19 Elm Place, North Rocks, NSW 2151 .... thank you.

The Australian Common Law Party will be just that ... a political movement/force to drive home our Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The way things stand, the Australian Judiciary are well encamped in our Courts exercising tyrannical control in a way that makes the Star Chamber Courts of old look like a pack of amateurs. Their role in the Banksters' "Drive for World Control" (as Jeremy Lee once said it, those years ago) is a Conspiracy of diabolical proportions. Therefore, we have to augment our Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Courts by going, again, for that Second Box in the Defence of Liberty ... i.e.: the Ballot Box.

The Australian Common Law Party ... by its very name ... will make it clear to all and sundry that we will not surrender our Free Man status in any way, shape or form. We will honour the sacrifices of our forefathers and protect the future of our children. Slavery is not for us.

Yours sincerely, John Wilson, Mobile: 0401 413 650

A.C.L.P. Constitution

A.C.L.P. Registration

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Public Smith's Office Email,
Email: Office@smith.minister.nsw.gov.au

Dear Servants of the Public,

EVERY DAY that Justice is denied, more and more and more Australian Families are destroyed by Thieves and Traitors. The Thieves, of course, are the Banks ... and the Traitors are the Judges. "Thieves only come to steal and kill and destroy" (John 10: 10 ).

The Banks are stealing by way of Contract Fraud, ie: "variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty", ie: variable interest rate mortgages are fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing.

The Judges are committing Treason by denying Australians their Right to Trial by Jury, to defend themselves by exposing the fraud and receiving the lawful Judgment of their Equals, ie: "No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, either dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor pass over him, nor send over him, except by means of the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land." (Magna Carta, which is entrenched Constitutional and Common Law in Australia). The Judges are Conspirators with the Banks in destroying Democracy, ie: "Trial by Jury is Democracy", by their venality, ie: Thomas Jefferson said in 1821: "A germ of the destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.".

Greg Smith SC, has taken over from John Hatzistergos as the NSW Attorney General and Minister for Justice ... and he has proven himself, by his concealing of these atrocities, to be as treacherous a Traitor as Hatzistergos was. The Banks have all these Traitors well in hand .... but they are fools, ie: "What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?" (Mark 8: 36) And don't forget: those who know of the Corruption and Treason, and aid these Crimes against the People by their Silence, are as Guilty as the Thieves and Traitors, themselves.

You now know what these "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" (Bill of Rights 1689) are doing as they "endeavour to subvert and extirpate (our) laws and liberties" (still, Bill of Rights 1689). So, what are you, individually and personally, going to do about it?

Yours sincerely, John Wilson.

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au