main ban

greek debt

About us
Email contact
DV Lies
USA Courts
Legal Terms
Child Abduction
Fem Dens
Tax Avoidance
Com. Purpose
Mass Media
CIA & Mossad
Masonic cops
The Matrix
Demo Village
Hollie Greig
Charity scams
Being a Father
Gulf Oil Spill
e Books
Gun control
United Nations
Legal Aid
Stop All Wars
Rock and Roll
Swine Flu
Two Tribes
News Archive
Aug 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
Mar 2015
Feb 2015
Jan 2015
Dec 2014
Nov 2014
Oct 2014
Sept 2014
Aug 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
Mar 2014
Feb 2014
Jan 2014
Dec 2013
Nov 2013
Oct 2013
Sept 2013
Aug 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sept 2012
Aug 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Apr 2012
Mar 2012
Feb 2012
Jan 2012
Dec 2011
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sept 2011
Aug 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
Dec 2010
Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
Jul 2010
Jun 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
Jul 2009
Jun 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
Dec 2008


united grand lodge of england

dirty lawyer



Daily Mail Rat

boycott israel


Palestine Solidarity Campaign
nwo resistance
israel real terror

The Menawa Report
Daily Sheeple
Bent Lawyers
Smiley Culture Blogspot
The Spearhead
Islandonline news
Revolution Harry
New Scientist
Greek rights
The Pavement
Jews against Zionism
Jews for Justice for Palestinians
NWO Observer
Voice from Gaza
Real Zionist News
Palestine Telegraph
Freemasonry Watch
Do you really want to know?
El Blog Del Prof. Rahmanicus

about us join contact

men fighting back


              1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see HERE)
              2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see HERE)
              3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see HERE)
              4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see HERE)
              5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see HERE)
              6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see HERE)
              7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see HERE)
              9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see HERE)
              9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see HERE)
              10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see HERE)
              11. Allow social workers, lawyers and judges with a homosexual (HERE) or radical feminist (HERE) agenda to decide
              on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
              12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see HERE)

them and us



We all strive to better ourselves , in our lives and in our children's lives, but that should NOT be at the expense of others. The ruling mafia have created an underclass for a number of reasons and would include letting us all know that if we do not follow their rules we may end up on the streets. Also their mass media propaganda machine ensures the poor, disabled, vulnerable and sick can be used as a punch bag and blamed for ALL the ills of the world and have us believe it is the POOR that are stopping us from bettering ourselves.

This is maybe the most ruthless and devious lie created by the press barons who have ensured the sheeple's venom is vented towards those least able to defend themselves while distracting attention away from the ruling mafia who live opulent lifestyles and with riches so VAST no one can truly comprehend how vast that wealth is. Fortunately the internet is rewriting history and exposing the myths within a propaganda machine that must break this despicable cycle of deceit and were a psychological battle has been waged on our minds to ensure we remain compliant with the ruling elite's demands. We must all re-learn to respect those who need our sympathy and understanding, not venom, and we must also be aware that every man facing injustice will allow in the end all men to face that same injustice .

Without fighting for the weakest in our society, while complying with the ruling mafia's orders, we condone and perpetuate a well orchestrated master plan that will allow these evil bastards to hold onto power unless our humanity has a massive wake up call and remove that ruling elite from power in one way or another. It is only in the interests of the ultra wealthy that this system can carry on ad infinitum. Everyone else will continue to suffer, as they have done throughout history, while the ruling mafia carry on their deceitful and diabolical plans and all part of their new technological order.


The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.



  • The X Factor vision of society blames the poor for their predicament
  • Campers descend on central Paris to highlight plight of homeless
    Do you think the cops are there to protect you from criminals?
    Do you think judges are there to give you justice?
    Do you think lawyers are there to protect your freedoms?
    Do you think legal aid is paid to poor litigants?
    Do you think bailiff's act honestly when evicting homeowners?
    Do you think social workers are there to protect your children?
    Do you think politicians are there to ensure your welfare?
    Do you think local authority chiefs are there to provide you with services?
    Do you think psychiatrists are there to guard your mental health?
    Do you think the banks are there to make YOU prosperous?
    Do you think the media are there to enlighten us?
    Do you think teachers are there to educate ?
    Do you think the armed forces are there to protect your security?
    Do you think regulators are there to ensure all of the above stay in line?

    If you have been reading and watching the complicit media for most of your life you likely have been brainwashed into believing all of the above, when in fact many are criminals or forced to act in a criminal way for their masters. They only get away with murder to protect the self appointed elite pulling the strings of their satanically controlled duped goons who act ONLY in the interests of the psychopathic madmen and women running the world while living in VAST OPULENCE.

    You might also believe that the latest credit crunch is affecting everybody, but look closely at the facts and you will see there is a tier of privileged individuals who NEVER suffer during controlled recessions. In fact they PROSPER while millions struggle to survive the sudden changes of fortune brought about by the few at the top deciding to rein in the pittance they provide in sustenance to the masses primarily to stop any major dissent from their form of enslavement and tyranny . For centuries these few dynastic families have been getting away with absolute murder turning generation upon generation of our forefathers into slaves for the ultra wealthy. Unless we stop them now our children and grandchildren will suffer the same deviant world they claim is some kind of civilized society. They have required a massive propaganda network to get away with this for so long, but by the day that machine is grinding to a halt in the mass exposure of the monstrous evil they have been getting away with.

    Do not be fooled by the fancy clothes and ancient traditions, these mobsters have been using subtle and devious tricks of the trade , disguised as some sort of esoteric knowledge, or so they claim, while using thuggery, blackmail, bullying and abuse to persecute anyone who steps outside their masonic bubble. These maniacs and psychopaths have been raping and murdering in endless wars they create to keep us all in fear and in our lowly place.

  • Super Rich The Greed Game (VIDEO)
  • Credit crunch? 619,000 millionaires living in Britain rising 17 per cent over the last two years
  • A third of Britain STILL belongs to the aristocracy
  • Pay gap between highest and lowest earners growing faster in Britain than any of the world's richest countries
    wake up Your passionate way with words is a daily source of energy to me and, I would expect, lots of others subscribers---keep it up!!...john
    There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle. But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it): International Men’s Organisation.
    From a review by the NWO University Forum
    Brilliant website matey I read it often and it blows my mind how much information you have gathered over the years well done dude. Sullers
    RELIABLE TRUTH SITES partisan 17 June 2012
    These are some sites that I find informative and balanced and more so, those sites somehow inspire and move one towards the light of Truth. HERE
    I have been reading stuff on your website for some time and can relate to everything that is being exposed. Glad there is a website out there which is really showing up and exposing it all. Kind regards DR
    Hi! Great site! Telling it like it is. Keep it up! Best Regards, Dr.Les Dove
    Love the site, you have a done an awesome job Dan
    I am an avid reader of International Mens Organisation. JB
    We love!
    I really appreciate your collection of resources on the website. Thank you for your wonderful resources. VB
    I just checked your website and I am blown away!! Its so cool to be in contact with you!! Axel
    I have been reading your site for some time now and gaining a deep insight into the workings of this so called democratic western world we live in. I would like to show my appreciation and gratitude. Thank you very much. Just as a good mate of mine always says: Ignorance is the worst sin. Therefore the revealing of knowledge and understanding must be the greatest virtue. Thanks again Rory UK
    Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work. NN
    Dear Sirs , I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site. I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it. Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum. Name and email supplied
    I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching. Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple. Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge! Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden


    We try and ensure most of what is published is important and highly relevant to men globally and especially those men made homeless and penniless by the evil misuse of the law and courts that have a feminist / homopaedo / masonic /zionist / law society driven agenda.

    We reproduce important articles under 'fair use' and in the 'public interest' with due credit to our sources.




    We are not here to promote the ultra-rich but to counter their mass media buddies who are trying to convince us there is NO MONEY and that the political lackeys, who they fund, are making policies, NOT for the greater good of all the world's people, but to make the ultra-rich even richer. Less than 1% of the people of this world own more than 90% of the world's wealth and that we aim to correct the lies and deceit about just who are responsible for that massive imbalance.

  • USA wealth inequality - top 0.1% worth as much as the bottom 90%
  • Rich 1% own half the world’s wealth (VIDEO)
  • Britain's richest 1% own as much as poorest 55% of population
  • Pseudo austerity has starved the peasants to feed the billionaires pulling ALL the strings
  • Just five super-wealthy families own more than the poorest 12 MILLION Britons put together
  • £13,000,000,000,000 trillion: The hoard hidden by global elite
  • How The Super Rich Avoid Paying Taxes
  • Feminist leaning Guardian think its great women make up 10% of super-rich billionaires list
  • No austerity for World's super-wealthy who spend their riches on luxury travel adventures
  • So much for austerity propaganda as Billionaires' club welcomes 210 new members
    global population

    Controlled temporarily by 5 million+ freemasons hand picked by the ruling mafia
    One mason for every 1427 people on the planet.
    Out of 196 countries in the world masons are embedded in 164 of them.

  • 5,000,000 Freemasons walk among us (VIDEO)
    Devoted Dad has spent £450,000 just to watch his beloved son grow up
    "The court system is so heavily-weighted towards the mum, I felt like I didn't get a look-in really.

    Stuart Whipps travels to Cyprus every fortnight to see son Charlie, now nine, after his ex-wife Chrys Faulla returned there with him

    A dad has spent £450,000 in the last seven years to watch his son grow up. Stuart Whipps travels to Cyprus every fortnight to see son Charlie, now nine, after his ex-wife Chrys Faulla returned there with him. On top of the £450,000 for flights, hotels and legal fees Stuart, who was forced to sell his IT firm, has paid £150,000 in maintenance. Stuart, 37, of Reading, Berks, who has remarried said: “All I want is to be a part of my son's life.

    "Since the day he was born, I have felt such a strong connection to him and I will pay whatever it takes to be the best father I can be. "I've been left in debt and worked so many hours I had a heart attack, but it was all worth it. "There is nothing I wouldn't do to make my son happy, even if it bankrupts me."

    The devoted dad now works part-time as an investment banker so he can work remotely from Cyprus. In all, he says he has made over 190 trips to Cyprus and thinks nothing of spending £2,000 each time he goes. He has also spent £60,000 on legal fees over the years.

    He added: "I've crippled myself financially, but I don't care - I want to be a part of my son's life growing up. "The court system is so heavily-weighted towards the mum, I felt like I didn't get a look-in really. Now married to Hayley, 44, a full-time mum, Stuart has one daughter with her Sophia, three, and a daughter from a previous relationship, Poppy, six.

    He has fought to keep their close-knit family in contact with Charlie - and has flown the entire family out to Cyprus so they can meet him. Stuart said: "My son spent every day with me until age of 18 months. "His mother decided to move to Cyprus to which I fought in court and lost. "To maintain my relationship, I've been put in this position, and there's nothing legally I can do."

    Chrys maintained she has Greek-Cypriot heritage, meaning when she was granted the right to take her child to Cyprus. Stuart said: "I'm pretty much skint now - I don't know what to do. "On one hand, I want to see my son grow up, but on the other hand, I can't relocate my family 2,000 miles away, to a foreign country, away from all their family and friends."

  • #BlackLivesMatter marches on Minnesota State Fair VIDEO
    Dark day for press freedom in Egypt VIDEO
    America's judicial mafia backs NSA phone data collection VIDEO
    Flying over Fukushima: Spooky drone footage of abandoned nuke station VIDEO
    Welfare reform: death and the benefit system
    What an irony for Iain Duncan Smith to get all stern about people being too casual about causality. The welfare secretary was rapped over the knuckles for bragging that his benefit cap had spurred claimants to move into jobs they’d likely have got anyway, but this week he became a model of rigor when he had to release figures about people who had died in and around the harsh process of claiming incapacity benefits. “Any causal effects,” his department warned, “cannot be assumed.”

    Strictly speaking, that is correct. The information released on Thursday does not join any dots between the anxiety of undergoing a “work capability assessment” (WCA) and the spiral of mental and physical decline which comes across in cases like that of Moira Drury, the sick woman whom we reported on Friday had died while battling a Department for Work and Pensions bent on cutting off her money, a connection which would – presumably – come across, too, in the internal reviews of 40 suspected suicide cases which the department hasn’t published.

    But if the DWP wanted to aid interpretation of the 40,680 individuals who had died within a year of their WCA, it could have included all sorts of contextual information with the figures. Instead, after fighting tooth and nail against the releasing the information at all, the numbers came in such sparse form that they were hard to make sense of. Whitehall always likes to leave awkward MPs and FoI requesters wishing they’d asked a slightly different question.

    On the same day, however, the DWP released a second, and more instructive, study of death rates more widely. The department was keen to highlight how, like everyone else, people on benefits have recently been living longer. But the report also revealed the grim reaper’s particular tendency to intrude upon incapacity benefit claimants. At one level, this is not surprising – these are all people with serious health problems. But excess mortality was not restricted to the very sickest; death rates were also more than double the average among that medically more marginal group, who are these days obliged to take certain steps to prepare for work. These are the people that Mr Duncan Smith had in his sights at the start of the week, when he gave a speech about requiring more people to work.

    Treading carefully in welfare reform really can be a matter of life and death. Sadly, careful treading isn’t the Duncan Smith way. Against expert advice, he rammed through the WCA – which he now suggests needs another overhaul – at breakneck speed. He lost control of a caseload that had previously been falling, and his universal credit is so far off-track that it will not be completed during this parliament.

    Amid such chaos, it’s tempting to improvise. But the bitter lesson of the last few years is that it’s better to pause, take stock and think things through. Instead of a silly season speech, there should be a green paper, then a white paper, and only then – if there’s a plan that makes sense – action. The alternative is pressing ahead, in a spirit of do and die.

  • And What Does Obama Think Of The Job He Has Done 7 Years Into His Presidency? VIDEO
    Tory gangsters and the trail of the dead

    Tory henchman Iain Duncan Smith

    David O'Mar was declared fit for work - and died two days later

    32 benefit claimants die a week

    Some 250,000 people signed a petition calling for the figures to be released

    MP Debbie Abrahams has pushed for the figures to be released

    There's been widespread fury as the Tories finally released the total today - only after 250,000 furious people signed a petition.


    More than 2,500 sick and disabled benefit claimants have died after being found 'fit for work' in just two years, shock figures reveal today.

    The Tories have finally released the total - burying it under immigration figures - after 250,000 furious people signed a petition calling on them to end the cover-up. Iain Duncan Smith's officials tried to stop the figures being released in full, mounting a legal challenge to publish only 'age-standardised' numbers instead. The stand-off saw him launch a blistering attack on Labour MPs including Debbie Abrahams, who've been demanding the figures for months. But he's now performed a U-turn and issued the devastating figures today.

    They show 2,650 benefit claimants died shortly after being found 'fit for work' between December 2011 and February 2014. The figures also appear to show more than half (1,360) had appealed the decision to throw them off sickness benefits before they died. Nearly all the deaths (2,380) were people on Employment and Support Allowance - which the Work and Pensions Secretary claims is meant to be a 'short-term' benefit. The rest (270) were on Incapacity Benefit (IB) or Severe Disablement Allowance (SDA).

    They were told to come off the benefit and transfer onto the lower-rate jobseekers' allowance - despite some being badly disabled. Tragic cases included diabetic dad David O’Mar, 58, who died just two weeks after being declared fit for work - a case Labour's Kate Green raised at the despatch box. The 'frightening and disgusting' figures have been slammed by Jeremy Corbyn, who said Iain Duncan Smith should resign.

    Labour leadership rival Andy Burnham added: "These are shocking figures that for the first time show the human cost of this Government's punishing benefits regime. "It raises serious questions about this Government's punitive approach to people on benefits." Shadow work and pensions minister Kate Green said: "These figures should be a wake-up call for the Government. Ministers need to focus on sorting out the assessment process so that everyone can have confidence in it, and providing support for disabled people who can work in order to help them do so." And Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who's campaigned on the issue, said: "The Government should be ashamed.

    "They should also apologise to claimants and families of those that have died for the distress they must have caused." Mencap spokesman Rob Holland, who leads the Disability Benefits Consortium, demanded an investigation and reform over the figures. "We know the fit for work test is failing disabled people with devastating consequences," he said.

    "Wrong decisions can mean people are left with little or no support at all, in some cases struggling to pay for their homes and basic essentials like food and heating." Tom Pollard of mental health charity Mind added: "Some of those we represent are so worried about losing their financial support that they contemplate taking, or attempt to take, their own lives." It's not been made clear how soon the claimants died after coming off sickness benefits. Officials have also refused to give a measure of how the deaths compare to the population at large.

    Other figures today show another 6,700 ESA claimants died in two years after being put in the 'work-related activity group', meaning they could move towards a job. They were more than twice as likely to die as people in the general population - around 5 deaths per 1,000 people compared to 2.4. That's despite the Budget docking that same group's benefits by £30 a week, making them the same as people on jobseekers' allowance.

    Today's mammoth release covers 11 years of data from 2003 to 2014 and shows overall death rates among benefit claimants have fallen. Deaths among all benefits claimants have fallen from 8.2 per 1,000 people in 2003 to 7.2 per 1,000 people in 2013. The national rate is around 2.4 per 1,000 people.

    Tories claim it's 'irresponsible' to draw a link between someone dying and their benefits being stopped. The last figures were released by the DWP in 2012 after a Freedom of Information campaign by the Mirror's investigative team. They showed 1,300 ESA claimants died within six weeks of being placed in a 'work-related activity' group between January and November 2011.

    In April the Department for Work and Pensions was ordered to release fresh figures by the Information Commissioner watchdog. But instead of releasing them it appealed to a tribunal with a letter that says the real number of deaths is 'likely to be misinterpreted'. Officials added: "Incorrect conclusions were likely to be drawn as to causal links between assessment outcomes and mortality.

    "Such misinterpretations would be contrary to the public interest, particularly given the emotive and sensitive context of mortality statistics." The department now appears to have reversed that decision. A DWP spokesman said today: "The mortality rate for people who have died while claiming an out-of-work benefit has fallen over a 10-year period.

    "This is in line with the mortality rate for the general working-age population. "The Government continues to support millions of people on benefits with an £80bn working-age welfare safety net in place."

  • Scrap all benefit sanctions (before anymore die)
    A SCOTTISH MP yesterday demanded an immediate halt to all benefit sanctions.

    The SNP’s Dr Eilidh Whiteford issued the call in the wake of a Jobcentre whistleblower’s revelations in the Record that workers are under pressure from bosses to stop claimants’ money. Half of all Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance sanctions are overturned on review – but not before they plunge desperate people into further hardship. Whiteford’s demand in a letter to Minister for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith also follows the exposure of how the DWP shamelessly fabricated success stories for a leaflet.

    In the letter, Whiteford tells Smith a “root and branch” independent review of sanctions must be carried out immediately. She said yesterday: “There is clearly a culture of pressure within the DWP which forces staff to refer people for sanctions for fear of retribution against themselves. “Staff should instead be encouraged to make decisions which are well thought out in the first place.

    “We learned that half of all ESA and JSA sanctions were overturned when reviewed, which just goes to show that there is a crisis at the heart of this discredited system and the DWP. “I have asked for the publication of all sanctions decisions for every centre across the UK so that the full picture of the apparent shambles within the DWP can be revealed. “All sanctions need to be halted immediately until a fundamental root and branch independent review of the DWP’s sanctions and conditionality can be carried out.”

    The brutal sanctions regime used against the most vulnerable Scots by the DWP has been blamed for creating a “humanitarian crisis”. The Daily Record revealed the truth about Iain Duncan Smith’s sanctions policy when our whistleblower laid bare to us the culture within Jobcentre Plus. It includes:

    *Bosses under pressure to keep sanction numbers up
    *Staff living in fear that low sanction numbers could affect their assessment
    *Vulnerable people become easy targets because they are confused by the system.
    *Ambitious staff who want to get on are handing out more sanctions than others.

    Whistleblower Liz (not her real name) said: “It disgusts me how vulnerable people are treated.

    “The bosses don’t set any specific written targets but they are not pleased if you don’t have any sanctions in a week. “Some staff worry if they don’t have any. That’s what makes the vulnerable an easy target.” Tony Cox, of the Dundee-based Scottish Unemployed Workers Network, has collated details of sanctions since early last year.

    He said: “The Record has done a great job in getting a DWP employee to speak out in print because it is undoubtedly true that staff are under pressure to hit targets. “And it is also true that the most vulnerable people are those most likely to be hit by sanctions. “I think we’re actually on the edge of a humanitarian crisis in Dundee.

    “Some of the most vulnerable people in this city are basically not being protected. “In actual fact, I would say they are being preyed upon by the so-called welfare system. “They are sanctioning at the drop of a hat if you’re 10 minutes late for an appointment. “This is not hyperbole. We are seeing hundreds of people in Dundee alone hit by sanctions. “They are being put into crisis and then kept in crisis.

    “We believe people are being targeted as an easy hit because of their demographic profile. “We found people with low level mental health issues, learning difficulties, the socially vulnerable, and older men with no families are most likely to suffer sanctions. “We also found people being released from prison and then sanctioned by the DWP for simple errors when confronted with this system.

    “Staff are given assessments and if they are not sanctioning … it can lead to poor assessments, which can then lead to disciplinary action. “Since we began campaigning early last year against these sanctions we have seen the sanctioning rate in Dundee fall by almost 40 per cent. “It shows what can be done and again reinforces our view sanctions were being handed out as a target-hitting exercise.”

    Unemployment expert Professor David Webster, of Glasgow University, said: “It’s become part of their normal staff appraisal system. Their work is reviewed periodically by their manager.

    “If they haven’t been imposing enough sanctions they’ve been told they have to improve their performance otherwise they will be put on a ‘personal improvement plan’ – a prelude to potential disciplinary action and dismissal.” A DWP spokeswoman said: “We’ve been very clear Jobcentre Plus has no targets for sanctions – written or otherwise. “The vast majority of those on benefits do the right thing by looking for work, and the number of sanctions are going down. Taxpayers would expect the small minority who refuse to do so would risk a reduction in benefits. Everyone has the right to appeal a sanction decision.” A committee of MPs have twice called for an inquiry into how sanctions work.

    A study by the New Policy Institute found claimants in Dundee were almost twice as likely to be handed sanctions than claimants in Glasgow. Figures elsewhere vary significantly. The NPI’s Peter Kenway said: “Given the number of people, that can’t in any way be put down to random fluctuation day to day. Everybody has a reasonable expectation the thing should be run the same way from one place to another.”

    Petition calls for end to Israeli blockade of Gaza VIDEO
    Usain Bolt gets taken out by idiot cameraman VIDEO
    Police: Shooter Vester Flanagan dead VIDEO
    Virginia Shooting Caught on Live TV VIDEO
    Two shot during WDJB interview woman is in stable condition VIDEO
    Vulnerable are easy targets as a DWP whistleblower reveals the scandal of benefits sanctions
    THOSE who are 'under-educated' or mentally ill are the easy victims of Iain Duncan Smith's welfare changes, and some ambitious Job Centre workers are hitting their sanctions targets at any cost.

    JOBCENTRE Plus bosses pressurise their staff every day to stop the benefits of poor and vulnerable Scots and leave them penniless. The drive to impose sanctions is such a huge part of the culture in Iain Duncan Smith’s DWP empire that workers suffer stress and anxiety if they don’t hand out enough. The most vulnerable people, including those who may have learning difficulties, are the easiest targets. Workers who impose too few sanctions run the risk of bad job reviews and losing their bonuses.

    Decent staff do all they can to protect vulnerable people. But ambitious workers who don’t care how they get ahead will hand out sanctions “for nothing” to keep the bosses happy. This is the scandalous reality in Scotland’s Jobcentres – revealed by a whistleblower with personal experience of how the Tory Department for Work and Pensions operates. Liz (not her real name) told the Daily Record: “It disgusts me how vulnerable people are treated.

    “The bosses don’t set specific written targets, but they are not pleased if you don’t have any sanctions in a week. “Some staff worry if they don’t have any. That’s what makes the vulnerable an easy target. “There are some people that want to climb the ladder and they would sanction people for nothing. “You should be taught to look at a person and think, ‘That person is vulnerable. They can’t read or write, they’ve got learning difficulties, maybe they’ve got a mental illness. “They might have three, four, five children and you are purposely taking their money from them.

    “It affects their housing benefit, it affects their council tax, and quite a lot of them don’t deserve it. But you are under pressure to hit these unwritten targets. “The pressure comes from your line managers, but ultimately it comes from the Government. “There were a lot of staff disgusted when Duncan Smith went on the TV and said, ‘Oh no, we don’t have targets.’ Because we had been told, ‘You’ve got to sanction.’

    “It’s very hard to sit in that position and know you’re stopping someone’s money unfairly. “There’s no leeway. If someone’s late because they’re not used to signing on, or they forgot to write down what they’ve been doing to find work, they can get sanctioned. “And if you don’t give out sanctions, you’re not doing your job properly. It goes towards your end-of-year report and whether you get your bonus.

    “At one of our weekly meetings, I spoke out. I said, ‘There’s no way I’m going to do that.’ “I was told in no uncertain terms, ‘That is your job and you will do it.’ “All the forms for sanctions are sent up to the ‘decision maker’. And nine times out of 10, people are sanctioned. If people miss appointments because they have a funeral or a wedding, or if they’re sick and they don’t tell us, they’ll be sanctioned.” Liz is no bleeding heart liberal. She said: “I have no problem sanctioning people who aren’t trying to get a job.” But she added: “I will complain when people don’t deserve it.

    “You have people who have mental health issues or learning difficulties and people unable to read or write or maybe just that wee bit under-educated. “During the election campaign, when I heard there were more cuts coming, I just thought, ‘Oh, those poor people’. Especially poor families. “There’s one wee woman I know, she’s got five kids, a lovely wee soul. I let her off by keeping her case under the radar.

    “One week, she couldn’t provide proof she’d applied for jobs because her log book to show what she’d been doing to find work was in the washing machine. Her husband had left her. “She wasn’t a scrounger, just not very good with records, computers or literacy. “She had to go to the food bank to feed her kids, even on her benefits. I just couldn’t stop her money. I would have been sanctioning the kids.”

    Liz said the same woman had been dealt with by others in the Jobcentre for the same sorts of problems – and had been sanctioned. “Quite a lot of colleagues sanction a lot,” she said. “Some just seem to have sanction after sanction. “They speak to the customer quite sharply, not giving them time to explain.”

    Liz said she and her colleagues were always aware that if they sanctioned parents, children would suffer. But she added: “People are scared to speak out in case they lose their jobs.” She fears the plight of poor families is being made even worse by the launch of Duncan Smith’s pet project, Universal Credit. It is paid out monthly – in arrears – to “replicate the world of work” and places far greater demands on vulnerable people to pay their ?own rent and manage their finances.

    She said Jobcentre staff hadn’t been properly trained to help people find their way through the new rules. People sanctioned at the Jobcentre can lose jobseekers allowance or employment and support allowance for a few days or up to three years. Official figures reveal that 918,000 claimants were sanctioned between April 2013 and March 2014.

    Citizens Advice say the number of sanctions more than doubled between 2010 – when David Cameron became Prime Minister – and last year. The charity said in 2014 that sanctions “force many people into poverty and ill health”. They said many claimants had to turn to food banks when their benefits were stopped, and many ?were sanctioned without a proper explanation of what they had done wrong or how to appeal.

    SNP Westminster welfare spokeswoman Eilidh Whiteford said stories like Liz’s were “extremely worrying”. She added: “They give an insight into the inner workings of the chaotic and damaging system being inflicted on the unemployed and disabled people by the UK Government. “The Tories’ inability to run this government department is having brutal and savage effects on the most vulnerable in society.

    “All sanctions need to be halted immediately until a fundamental, root-and-branch, independent review can be carried out. There is a crisis at the heart of this discredited system and the DWP.” Labour Shadow Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said Liz’s experiences chimed with cases he had dealt with as a constituency MP. He said: “I had one guy on a mandatory computer course from noon until 1pm, and he had to sign on at 1pm on the other side of the city. “He was 15 minutes late and he was sanctioned.

    “These individual cases in themselves are dreadful, but the overall narrative is of hard-working DWP staff being put under intolerable pressure by an ideologically driven government who are fundamentally attacking the poorest and the most vulnerable. “We suspect there are unwritten targets within the DWP, and Iain Duncan Smith has to very quickly produce a report on what targets are being set. “If the most vulnerable people who don’t understand the system are being targeted, any reasonable person would find that intolerable.”

    Ewan Gurr, who runs the Trussell Trust’s network of food banks in Scotland, said sanctions had led to “a significant increase in demand for emergency food”. He said it was a concern, “especially when these sanctions appear to have been imposed in an unfair or excessive manner”. Ewan added that even though universal credit was still being rolled out nationally, his staff were already hearing stories of “lengthy benefit delays and rent arrears”.

    And he warned: “We need to ensure that those who struggle with a lack of literacy, or to understand the complexities of the welfare system, are aware of the support available to them. “When the administration of our welfare system has the potential to lead to hunger and homelessness, we must act. “We must call on our elected representatives to intervene with urgency on behalf of individuals, families and our most vulnerable citizens.”

    The Department for Work and Pensions said: “We’ve been very clear that Jobcentre Plus has no targets for sanctions – written or otherwise. “The vast majority of those on benefits do the right thing by looking for work, and the number of sanctions is going down. “Taxpayers would expect the small minority who refuse to look for work would risk a reduction in benefits. Everyone has the right to appeal a sanction decision.”

  • Tory's evil sanction regime leaving vulnerable homeless and penniless and a postcode lottery (They got this one from a Gestapo handbook)
  • Benefits shakeup aims to force more disabled people into jobs
  • Row breaks out over tory scum benefit cuts 'suicide watch' claims
  • Tory henchman IDS's sanction regime leads to absolute destitution (and mass murder by psychological and financial torture)
  • Tory scumbag Iain Duncan Smith's shameful attack on the poor (he plans to deliberately target the sick and disabled in his latest attack on benefits)
  • Tory henchman IDS plans on killing the disabled with sanctions for not working (Cancer and heart attack victims will face more persecution tactics)
  • Vile Desmond rag backs tory henchman's ruthless attack on the poor
  • Vile Desmond rag promotes draconian tory agenda's attacks on the poor
  • Vile Desmond rag claims tory scumbag IDS a hero
  • Pension SHOCK for millions: Experts say we must ALL work longer
  • Tory henchman Iain Duncan Smith's 100 Biggest Failures
  • Tory bastards massive austerity for the poor while claiming massive hotel bills for themselves
  • Vile Barclay brothers rag hail tory henchman IDS a hero (Ultra rich scum happy to see poorest peasants dying through austerity)
  • Vile Barclay brothers rag give murdering tory psycho platform to spout evil murderous agenda
  • Vile Harmsworth rag backs tory henchman IDS's murderous agenda
  • Compassion: something the political mafia lack
    Britain is being controlled by murderers and its hard to believe so many evil bastards voted them into power unless it is really down to a voting system that is heavily skewed in favour of a vile ruling elite.

    Strong leaders are pushed by the zionist / freemason media as the main criteria for power but when you examine the psyche of these STRONG leaders you see a total lack of compassion and why millions remain impoverished while they spend public money on vast military and science projects that do NOTHING to enhance the lives of those who find themselves at the bottom of the pecking order.

    The tory mafia who control Britain are the stereotypical psychopathic mindset who spend all their waking hours working out how they can persecute the poor into early graves. The UK mobsters are expert at persecuting their targets using psychological torture (sanctions) to push the vulnerable, poor and disabled over the edge .

    Either we accept that Britain is a sick society where the supposed majority voted for these murdering bastards, or we are living in a flawed state where no matter what the peasants need they will always get a bunch of ruthless scum only to interested in propping up their billionaire backers while conjuring up ever more legislation to push millions more into the gutter. Britain can no longer stomach the grotesque distortion of a system of power that is neither democratic or fair to the poorest sections of society who will never benefit from a quality of life that the ruling masters provide to themselves with generous benefits that ensure vast inequality protects the rich at the utter expense of the poor.

  • $124bn (£78.5bn) wiped off the fortunes of the 400 wealthiest people in the world


    Among the biggest 'Black Monday' losers was Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who lost an estimated $3.2billion (£3bn), according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

    Its estimated that a staggering $124bn (£78.5bn) was wiped off the fortunes of the 400 wealthiest people in the world, with 24 billionaires across the globe losing more than $1bn(£630m) in worth on Monday. Also taking a heavy hit were Warren Buffet losing $2bn (£1.3bn) and Mexico’s Carlos Slim whose fortune fell by $1.6bn (£1bn). Alisher Usmanov, a major shareholder of Premier League side Arsenal, saw $338.5m (£214m) cut from his $12.5bn (£7.9bn) stockpile. And Chelsea's Russian owner Roman Abramovich lost $160.2m (£101.4m) of his £11.9bn (£7.5bn) net worth.

    However, billionaires in Asia were hit hardest after the main Chinese stock market tumbled by 8.5 per cent yesterday, to stand at almost half its value since June. The richest people in Asia have lost around a fifth of their wealth in the past three months - $54billion (£34bn) alone since Friday, calculates Blomberg. Asia's richest person Wang Jianlin saw around $3.6billion (£2.3bn) wiped off his worth on Monday, the largest fall in value worldwide.

    But the loss is small change for the billionaire who still has a worth off around $31.2bn (£20bn), according to the index. Mr Gates is also unlikely to have lost much sleep over his losses with an overall value now at $79bn (£50bn).

    London's FTSE 100 lost more than £70billion in value yesterday after the selling-panic spread from China to Europe and also affected stock markets in the US. Losses continued in China's Shanghai Composite Index today, but the panic appeared to have subsided in Britain with the FTSE 100 and 250 back in the green this morning.

  • America withholding Chilcot Inquiry documents VIDEO

  • White House in Chilcot 'cover-up': America bans crucial files
    that could reveal secret of why Blair invaded Iraq
  • Trump shows How Billionaires Can Make Politicians Dance Like Puppets VIDEO
    Is China Getting the Greek Treatment?
    As China's stock market tumble precipitates a worldwide crash, we revisit this prescient 2011 article entitled "Illuminati Will Burst China's Bubble":

    "The Illuminati want a country to be in monstrous debt so they can crash its economy at will, and use the IMF to hijack the country's political system and major corporations. It is likely that China will experience an economic collapse once it reaches the desired level of development."


    'Every province in China is Greece. Why aren't they imploding like Greece?' (2011) David Richards, now 27, teaches English in Mongolia. He was living in China in 2011.

    (from 28/12/11) by David Richards (

    The mainstream media generally portray the US as a dying giant and China as an unstoppable rising power.

    And yet, both countries have virtually the same debt-to-GDP levels. The US has $15 trillion worth of debt and a GDP of just over $14 trillion, while China has a GDP of $5.8 trillion and debts of $5.7 trillion. So why is China portrayed as being strong? Because, as the Goldman Sachs graph shows, over the next 40-years, the Illuminati plan to weaken the US and strengthen China. Economics are a veil for an agenda.

    China is picked to be the economic powerhouse of the New World Order. A 2003 projection of the world's economies by Goldman Sachs 'predicts' that China's GDP will overtake the US in 2040. By 2050 China's GDP will have reached $45,000 billion, leaving the US a distant second with $35,000 billion. Germany, the powerhouse of the EU, will only have a GDP of $2,500 billion.


    This projection is at odds with China's current economic weakness. The economy is fuelled by a construction bubble that should have burst years ago. Recently Larry Lang, an economics professor and Chinese TV personality, gave a speech spelling out China's dire economic predicament

    He calculates China's debt to be about 36 trillion yuan (US$5.68 trillion). This calculation is reached by adding up Chinese local government debt (between 16 trillion and 19.5 trillion yuan, or US$2.5 trillion and US$3 trillion), and the debt owed by state-owned enterprises (another 16 trillion). The combined interest on these debts is a colossal two trillion yuan per year. Lang believes China is bankrupt and can't understand why the country isn't in economic free-fall. By his memorable calculation 'every province in China is Greece.' Why aren't they imploding like Greece?

    China's economy is completely artificial. According to Lang, private consumption makes up just 30% of Chinese economic activity. In 2010, 70% of GDP came from infrastructure construction, including real estate development, railways, and highways. An investment banker recently described China's construction bubble as the 'greatest bubble in history.' Clearly, China cannot afford to fuel this bubble itself. The Illuminati bankers fuel it to aid the country's development.


    The Illuminati want a country to be in monstrous debt so they can crash its economy at will, and use the IMF to hijack the country's political system and major corporations. It is likely that China will experience an economic collapse once it reaches the desired level of development.

    This is what happened to South Korea, one of the 'Asian Tigers' that crashed in 1997. Like China, South Korea had been going through a rapid period of growth, posting growth figures of 6-10% each year, due to having a protected economy receiving plenty of overseas investment. However, once South Korea reached the desired level of development, the bankers crashed their economy and took full control of the country. South Korea needed IMF loans to survive. Before the South Korean general election in 1998, the IMF took the unprecedented step of demanding that all Presidential contenders agreed to their will.

    In the 're-adjustment process' all the major South Korean corporations were sold off to foreign investors, e.g. General Electric bought a controlling share in the technology giant LG. The same scam could be pulled on China.

    The Illuminati have put China on a rapid course of development, while keeping the country under their control by making it an economic powder keg that can be lit at any time.

  • Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati
  • KLM plane landing in storm VIDEO
    China: Is It All Over?
    In recent weeks, the Chinese stock market has taken a massive plunge and in July shares suffered their worse month in six years, falling by 29% from the peak in June. This followed a humungous boom in stock prices since the beginning of 2015. Indeed, since August of last year, the market index in Shanghai has risen 160%. And even after the collapse in the last month the index is still nearly 80% higher than this time in 2014.

    This stock market bubble is of the proportion of the US in the 1920s that led to the crash of 1929 and the subsequent great depression. Is this what is in store for the Chinese economy as well? The recent collapse and the failure of government intervention to stop it has produced a chorus of doom-mongers about the future of the Chinese economy. But this is nothing new. As John Ross has pointed out, there are continual scare stories about the end of the “Chinese miracle”.1 In January 2014, the ‘Financial Times’ ran an article headlined “China’s debt-fuelled boom is in danger of turning to bust”. In April, another FT headline declared: “China’s crisis is coming – the only question is how big it will be.” In October, the American Enterprise Institute announced: “An economic mess in China”.

    American academic Michael Pettis is a favourite source in such articles – the US financial website ‘Zero Hedge’ featured an article entitled “A Chinese soft landing will inevitably lead to a very brutal hard landing”, Pettis warns’. The ‘Financial Times’ carried several articles by George Magnus, former senior economic advisor to Swiss bank UBS, who predicts a coming slowdown of China’s economic growth to 3.9%. Or take this comment more recently: the ‘Wall Street Journal’ published an opinion piece by David Shambaugh in March arguing that “the endgame of Chinese communist rule has now begun … and it has progressed further than many think”.2

    Further back, in 2002 Gordon Chang wrote a book entitled ‘The coming collapse of China’. In the same year ‘The Economist’ magazine produced a special China supplement called “A dragon out of puff”. This report stated: “The economy still relies primarily on domestic engines of growth, which are spluttering. Growth over the last five years has relied heavily on massive government spending. As a result, the government’s debt is rising fast. Coupled with the banks’ bad loans and the state’s huge pension liabilities, this is a financial crisis in the making.” ‘The Economist’s conclusion in 2002 was: “In the coming decade, therefore, China seems set to become more unstable.” In reality, far from entering a crisis, China had the fastest growth ever experienced by a major economy in recorded history.

    Different this time?

    But maybe this time it will be different. How do we answer that question? Well, the first thing to consider is that the movement of stock prices is not always or even often a guide to what is happening in the wider economy of production, employment and incomes. This applies even more to China, where an even smaller percentage of the population than average have shares or pension funds that trade in the stock market. China’s stock market performance has rarely had much, if any, correlation with the country’s real economy. Barely 20 years old and poorly regulated, the stock market still has more in common with the gambling casinos of Macau than with global exchanges in western capitals such as New York, London or Tokyo.

    As Arthur Kroeber, head of ‘Gavekal Dragonomics’, points out, only 7% of urban Chinese have money in the market.3 Moreover, the Chinese stock market is totally ‘rigged’ in free-market capitalist terms. Of the companies quoted on the Chinese stock market, the main holders are other Chinese companies, various national Chinese social funds and government institutions such as the ministry of finance. Investment companies of different types and calibres comprise just 7% from the declared share ownership structure, and individual investors represent only 2.2%. So the ordinary ‘day trading’ gamblers in Chinese cities are a very tiny proportion of stock holders.4 In other words, the Chinese government, through state-owned and directed banks and cross-shareholdings of state companies, can exercise considerable control over stock market trading. But that is why it has been a particular shock this time, that when the government intervened to prop up share prices through the ‘freezing’ of prices and the banning of ‘short selling’ (measures used in the past by many governments), it appeared not to work for long, with prices falling back after an initial rebound.

    Why does government intervention appear to have failed this time? Well, it is partly because this stock market bubble was initially engineered by the government, which then found it had created a Frankenstein monster that it cannot control – such is the lesson of capitalist markets! The government wanted to rein in a huge property bubble that it had created after the great recession led to a decline in exports to the US and Europe, and it needed to stimulate growth through domestic demand. This property bubble was driven by low interest rates, huge savings held by richer Chinese, and local governments borrowing or selling land to build homes and cities for the burgeoning urban population.

    Chinese banks searching for profit and corrupt local government officials engaged in this property boom. The result was a rise in debt, both in the public sector, hidden from the books by local governments, and among property developers. Total national debt is now 282% of gross domestic product, according to estimates by McKinsey, a higher rate than in the US.5 Outside the banks, debt is now over 200% of GDP, according to the Bank for International Settlements. The government then reversed its policy and set out to curb the property boom with blocks on local government and real estate borrowing. With property out of reach, richer Chinese switched their speculations into the stock market. And in this speculation, the government gave them support. The large majority of the nearly $800 billion in what is called ‘margin borrowing’ for stock market trades comes from the banks. This also means that any losses that are realised if the stock market stays down from previous peaks will eventually fall on the banks from the non-payment of debts by stockbrokers and traders. Given that, apparently, much of these loans have been at very low or even no interest, the state-owned banks could face considerable losses, which in turn may fall onto the books of the government as a last resort.

    But let us be clear. China can afford even serious losses to bank capital from a stock market bust. This time last year, China had $4 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, mostly dollars. This is the biggest ‘war chest’ for a rainy day (to mix the metaphors) in the world. In the last year, it has used about $300 billion of that up, or 7%. And even this fall is not really due to covering potential losses in the stock market. It is a result of the relative decline in China’s trade surplus, so China is not racking up as much dollar revenues as before. It is also the result of the government not buying so many US dollar assets like US government bonds, which it used to do in order to keep the exchange rate of the Chinese renminbi weak for better trade. Moreover, Chinese exporting companies are now tending to hold onto their dollar revenues for purchases and repayment of debts rather than deposit them with China’s central bank for only low interest. Yes, there has been a capital outflow, as foreign investors take some of their money out of China and rich Chinese try to spirit cash out from the tentacles of the anti-corruption campaign of the government. But China still has huge firepower to absorb any stock market bust and subsequent bank losses.

    Slowing economy

    There may be doubt that the stock market crash will have any appreciable impact on the Chinese economy. But there is no doubt that China’s economy, however you measure it, is slowing down. China has been an economic miracle. This is something not even the most prejudiced and biased ‘free market’ economist can deny. When Deng Xiaoping took over control of the Chinese state and Communist Party back in the later 1970s, at the beginning of ‘neoliberal’ period in the major capitalist economies of the ‘west’, his first stated target was to increase the size of China’s economy by 400% between 1981 and 2000. The actual increase was 623%. The second goal was to increase China’s GDP by a further 400% between 2000 and 2050, or 1,600% between 1981 and 2050. In reality, China’s economy had already grown by over 2,200% compared to 1981 by 2014. Deng Xiaoping’s target was reached 38 years ahead of schedule! As regards China’s latest stated goal – to double GDP between 2010 and 2020 – China is also ahead of its growth target.6

    China has raised 620 million people out of internationally defined poverty. Its rate of economic growth may have been matched by emerging capitalist economies for a while back in the 19th century when they were ‘taking off’. But no country has ever grown so fast and been so large (with 22% of the world’s population) – only India, with 16% of the world’s people, is close. As John Ross has pointed out,7 in 2010 87 countries had a higher per capita GDP than China, but 83 were lower. Back in the early 1980s, three-quarters of the world’s people were better off than the average Chinese. Now only 31% are. Behind China’s impressive economic rise has been the biggest human migration in history. By 2013, some 269 million rural residents had become migrant workers in cities, offering cheap labour and sustaining urban growth. This is an achievement without precedent. But things are now changing. It used to be a benchmark that China had to grow at 8% a year to absorb the expansion of the labour force from rural areas into the factories and cities. But China’s economy is now growing at its slowest rate since the end of the global financial crisis and the great recession in 2009. On official figures, growth has slowed to 7% year on year from a previous double-digit pace and most unofficial estimates reckon growth is really even slower.

    The slowdown is particularly visible in the industrial sectors. Value-added industrial output, a measure of manufacturing production, has hit financial-crisis levels. Industrial production grew by only 6% year-on-year in June, while electricity output, a revealing measure of activity has dropped to near zero. And the consumption of goods has also slowed. Retail sales rose over 10% at the last count. That sounds a lot by the standards of the major capitalist economies, but it is a slower rate than during the financial crisis.

    Above all, the crucial driver of growth – fixed-asset investment, which measures money put into big projects and factories – rose 13.5% year on year, down from a peak of 30% back in 2009, if still at a higher rate than in the early 2000s. Even more illuminating is that Chinese industrial company profits are contracting, making it more difficult to invest more or pay off debts.

    The most up-to-date measure of economic activity can be found from the purchasing managers’ index (PMI). This is a survey of business managers in companies on the level of their purchases. Are they buying more for their companies this month than last month? According to the July figure for the Caixin manufacturing PMI, Chinese manufacturing activity is in its weakest shape in three years. The PMI fell to 47.8 in July, down from 49.4 in June. A reading below 50 indicates the manufacturing sector is contracting and this is the fifth consecutive month the index has been below that mark. The slowdown is partly a result of the sluggish recovery in the world economy in Europe, Japan and the US, the main destinations for Chinese exports. But it is also part of a deliberate and carefully signalled policy by China’s president, Xi Jinping, to shift growth away from the export-dominated model that brought more than a decade of double-digit growth rates, as China exploited cheap labour to become the undisputed workshop of the world. Instead, Beijing hopes to achieve the next stage of economic development through more sustainable, domestic-led growth, encouraging urbanisation, and increasing the role of markets. Opening up its stock markets to overseas investors – albeit via intermediaries in Hong Kong – was one step in that process. The driving force behind the country’s growth has been investment.8 Now the argument of the mainstream economists of the west is that China has engaged in wild ‘overinvestment’, while neglecting the need to boost consumption and the services-based modern economy. This is what the current government must seek to achieve or China will either crash or explode.

    All these mainstream pundits reckon that China will slow permanently. The International Monetary Fund now reckons China’s trend growth rate will fall to about 6.3% by about 2019. Others are more pessimistic. The US Conference Board forecast that after 2020 growth would be only 4% a year. Why? First, the need to control the credit bubble will mean tighter monetary policy and thus slower investment growth. Second, the great urbanisation explosion will cease, as there is already enough housing and transport for the population. Keynesian pundits in America, Lawrence Summers and Lant Pritchett, reckon that all developing economies must eventually slow down, as history shows. For China, they argue that “par” for the statistical course would involve a decline in the trend growth rate to only 5% over the next ten years and to 3.9% on average over the next two decades.9

    Middle income

    But are the mainstream models of past economic development accurate or relevant to understanding China’s economic miracle over the last 30 years? The mainstream argument goes that China is now a ‘middle-income’ (capitalist) economy and unless it allows the market to rule, it will not close the gap in productivity and income per head with the advanced, older capitalist economies. Only this will enable China to escape from the so-called ‘middle income trap’. They mean that, to begin with, ‘emerging economies’ can grow fast with big capital investment and exports, using cheap labour and new technology – the Chinese model. But less than a fifth of the 180 countries in the world have made it to being advanced economies. Of the 101 countries that were ‘middle-income’ in 1960, only 13 had managed to break from the pack to become advanced economies by 2008.10 One reason why countries get stuck in this ‘middle-income trap’ is that they reach what is known as the ‘Lewis point’, named after the left economist of the 1950s, Arthur Lewis. Put simply, this is the point at which a developing country stops being able to achieve rapid growth relatively easily, by simply taking rural workers doing unproductive farm labour and putting them to work in factories and cities instead. Once this ‘reserve army of labour’ is exhausted, urban wages rise, incomes reach a certain level and a ‘middle class’ emerges. Distorting Lewis’s theory, mainstream economics asserts that then there must be a switch to boosting domestic consumption that a state-led economy cannot undertake. So the cry is: ‘Liberalise with free trade and capital – that’s the only way to move on!’

    This model was advocated for China’s future in a World Bank report11published a few years ago in conjunction with China’s advisory body, the Development Research Centre of China’s State Council. The report argued that there would be an economic crisis in China unless state-run firms were scaled back. China needed to implement “deep reforms”, selling off state-owned enterprises and/or making them operate more like commercial firms. According to the World Bank, China’s growth would decelerate rapidly once people reached a certain income level – a phenomenon that these economists call the “middle-income trap”. The report said the answer was to set up “asset-management firms” to sell off state industries, overhaul local government finances and promote “competition and entrepreneurship”. The first of its six strategic measures is the privatisation of the state. This is put right up front. In contrast, there is no mention of the democratisation of the state, the ending of one-party rule; the ending of the suppression of individual rights and freedoms, allowing trade union rights, etc. But is this scenario of the “middle-income trap” due to the loss of “comparative advantage” in cheap labour, Lewis-point style? Or is it due to the failure of developing capitalist economies to raise productivity and sustain investment in technology and human capital in the face of cycles of falling profitability and global crises – often engendered in the mature capitalist economies and thus outside the control of individual national economies? In other words, is the slowdown of all previous emerging capitalist economies ultimately a sign of the failure of the capitalist mode of production itself?12

    It is no accident that only two large developing capitalist economies have succeeded in becoming part of the rich capitalist club in the last 50 years. Measured in GDP per capita and starting at $3,000 per head (PPP real) 40 years ago, Taiwan and Korea now have per capita GDPs over $25,000. In the same period, no other Asian tiger or Latin American economy has risen above $13,000, still within the World Bank’s middle-income range. Taiwan was a special client state of the US and also benefited hugely from China’s own expansion and from Japan trade. Korea also had a special trade agreement with US. Both economies had large state holding companies, military regimes that restricted “free markets” and were oriented to investment in heavy industry and technology – not the neoclassical model. Interestingly, at its current stage in this process, China’s per capita GDP is higher and growing much faster than even Taiwan and Korea.

    Even if China slows down over the medium term, as everybody now predicts, it will still add over $21 trillion to its GDP before the end of the decade and reach the size of the US economy by then. And it is not really true that the Chinese economy has restricted consumption. Consumption may have fallen as a share of GDP during the fast pace of investment expansion and urbanisation, but real consumption per head in China has been growing at 8.5% annually for a decade – the highest of any major economy. Even though China’s consumption as a share of GDP is very low by capitalist standards (anywhere between 35% and 45% of GDP, depending on how you measure it, compared to 65%-75% in mature capitalist economies), it will add another $10 trillion in annual consumption by 2020, equivalent to the size of America’s annual consumption. These figures come from the World Bank report itself. This has been achieved without the capitalist mode of production being hegemonic.

    The World Bank report admits that the ‘free market’ still does not dominate in China – indeed that is the problem, according to the World Bank and its domestic supporters. The report recognises that China’s incredible economic success over the last 30 years was based on an economy where growth was achieved through bureaucratic state planning and government control of investment. Nevertheless, the mainstream economics and western ‘China watchers’ continue to promote a development model for China that is ‘consumption-led’ and dominated by markets. It is the height of hypocrisy for the World Bank and expert China watchers to demand the end of state planning, the privatisation of the financial system and to promote ‘free markets’ in the stock markets and key industrial sectors after the experience of deregulation and free markets in the major capitalist economies led to the biggest collapse in global finance and GDP in the great recession since the 1930s. How can that be a model for future Chinese development?


    Already, the expansion of markets over planning in China has led to increasingly volatile and dangerous bubbles in credit, property and stock markets that mirror the experience of the west. And it has led to a huge rise in inequality of wealth and income, something that many more ‘liberal’ pro-capitalist economists are worried about in the west. China’s property and stock market bubbles show that the great expansion in industry and investment in the last 10 years has not been equally shared. China’s Gini coefficient, an index of income inequality, according to Sun Liping, a professor at Beijing’s Tsinghua University, has risen from 0.30 in 1978, when the Communist Party began to open the economy to market forces, to 0.46. Indeed, China’s Gini coefficient has risen more than any other Asian economy in the last two decades.

    The IMF has found that the Gini coefficients (gross and net of tax) rose from an average of 0.30 and 0.29 in the 1980s, respectively, to 0.52 and 0.53 by 2013.13 Similarly, the income share of the top 1% of households in China increased from 2.8% in 1980 to 4.9% in 2009. This ratio is still relatively low compared to that in many other countries (such as 7.2% in South Korea and 19% in the US, but it is significantly higher than the total income share of the lowest quintile of households in China. This rise in inequality is partly the result of the urbanisation of the economy, as rural peasants move to the cities. Urban wages in the sweatshops and factories are increasing, leaving peasant incomes behind (not that those urban wages are anything to write home about, when workers assembling Apple i-pads are paid under $2 an hour). But it is also partly the result of the elite controlling the levers of power and making themselves fat, while allowing some Chinese billionaires to flourish.

    There is massive offshore evasion of tax and the hoarding of secret bank accounts by China’s super-rich, yet again revealed in the leaked reports about the ‘Chinese princelings’, among others. More than a dozen family members of China’s top political and military leaders are making use of offshore companies based in the British Virgin Islands, leaked financial documents have revealed. The brother-in-law of China’s current president, Xi Jinping, as well as the son and son-in-law of former premier Wen Jiabao, are among the political relations making use of these offshore havens.14

    Socialism with Chinese characteristics

    What lies at the heart of the debate about China’s future is the class nature of its economy and social relations. In my view, China cannot be seen as just another capitalist economy. It is a hybrid. The planning mechanism that was adopted when the communists came to power in 1949 still dominates the economy. But the communist elite have steadily expanded the role of the private sector in the economy, while maintaining control at all levels of the ‘commanding heights’ of the economy in banking, industry and even service sectors. This is what the party elite like to call ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’.

    China’s “socialism with Chinese characteristics” is a weird beast. It is not ‘socialism’ by any Marxist definition or by any benchmark of democratic workers’ control. And there has been a significant expansion of privately owned companies, both foreign and domestic, over the last 30 years, with the establishment of a stock market and other financial institutions. But the vast majority of employment and investment is still undertaken by publicly owned companies or by institutions that are under the direction and control of the Communist Party. The biggest part of China’s world-beating industry is not made up of foreign-owned multinationals, but Chinese state-owned enterprises.15 The major banks are state-owned and their lending and deposit policies are directed by the government (much to the chagrin of China’s central bank and other pro-capitalist elements). There is no free flow of foreign capital into and out of China. Capital controls are imposed and enforced and the currency’s value is manipulated to set economic targets (much to the annoyance of the US Congress).

    At the same time, the single party state machine infiltrates all levels of industry and activity in China. According to a report by Joseph Fang and others,16 there are party organisations within every corporation that employs more than three Communist Party members. Each party organisation elects a party secretary. It is the party secretary who is the lynchpin of the alternative management system of each enterprise. This extends party control beyond the SOEs, partly privatised corporations and village or local government-owned enterprises into the private sector – or ‘new economic organisations’, as these are called. In 1999, only 3% of these had party cells. Now the figure is nearly 13%.17 The law of value does operate in China, mainly through foreign trade and capital inflows, as well as through domestic markets for consumption goods, services and funds. But the impact is ‘distorted’, ‘curbed’ and blocked by bureaucratic ‘interference’ from the state and the party structure, to the point that it cannot yet fully dominate and direct the trajectory of the Chinese economy.

    But its pernicious influence on growth and inequality is growing. The best guide to that are the changes in the profitability of Chinese capital, as the private sector has expanded and the state sector has been faced with trying to compete domestically and in world markets. There have been three cycles of profitability for Chinese industry in the last 40 years since Deng ‘liberalised’ the ‘command economy’ of Mao. Between 1978 and 1990, there was an upswing, as capitalist production expanded through the Deng reforms and the opening up of foreign trade. But from 1990 to the end of that decade, there was a decline, as overinvestment gathered pace and other economies, particularly in the emerging world, went through a series of crises (Mexico 1994, Asia 1997-98, Latin America 1998-2001). The falling rate of profit then was accompanied by a slowing in the rate of GDP growth. Then, from about 1999 onwards, there was a rise in profitability, which also saw a significant rise in the rate of China’s economic growth (as the world too expanded at a credit-fuelled pace). But it looks as though profitability peaked in 2004-06.18

    After 2007, the slump in world capitalism drove down Chinese profitability. This is particularly visible in the fall in the ‘productivity of capital’ invested since 2007. Inevitably, this has had a deleterious effect on GDP growth – profits lead investment and investment leads growth, particularly in China.

    Big decisions

    Despite the efforts of the ‘reformers’ (pro-free market) in the Chinese leadership, there has been no change in the general philosophy of ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ and thus the maintenance of the dominance of the state sector. The majority in the leadership seem to want to continue with an economic model that is dominated by state corporations directed at all levels by the communist cadres. Markets will not rule and the law of value will not dominate prices, labour incomes or domestic trade. Can the elite continue with this ‘halfway house’ without provoking either a crisis or slump that will force them to follow the ‘capitalist road’, as the World Bank and the pro-capitalist elements want? Will the elite face an eruption from below, as the fast-growing working class urban population starts to flex its muscles for a say in running society?

    Well, I think not – at least not yet. Even on the most pessimistic estimates, China is still growing faster than any other major capitalist country and nearly all the so-called emerging economies. The working population is still growing, although it will soon peak around 2020; there are still hundreds of millions of rural workers and peasants to be incorporated into the industrial machine; and China is still sucking up as much the world’s raw materials as it needs to sustain its expansion. If the capitalist road is adopted by the new leaders and the law of value becomes dominant, it will expose the Chinese people to chronic economic instability (booms and slumps), insecurity of employment and income, and greater inequalities even worse than the current stock market crisis.

    On the other hand, if the surplus created by the Chinese people remains under the control of an elite backed by an army and police and ruling without dissent, then the needs and aspirations of a more affluent and educated population will not be met. The key to continued growth and more equality will be democracy. China needs to move from so-called ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ (ie, a state-led economy under a corrupt autocracy) to a China with socialist foundations (democratic planning and equality). China cannot just stay as it is indefinitely, whatever its leaders might hope

  • UFO Files 2015 MoonWalkers The Untold Story VIDEO
    Benefits shakeup aims to force more disabled people into jobs
    Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, is poised to announce a radical reform of sickness benefits that the government hopes will force up to 1m more disabled people into work.

    Changes to employment and support allowance (ESA) and the assessment of people claiming sickness benefits will be part of a package of announcements expected to be made public on Monday, which aims to shrink the “disability employment gap” by taking many people off benefits and expecting them to move into work. The reforms will anger disability campaigners, who claim that they are being targeted as part of a £12 billion cut in the welfare bill.

    The changes come days after the Department for Work and Pensions admitted it had used made-up stories from fictional claimants to demonstrate the positive impact of benefit sanctions. On Thursday, the DWP is expected to release data for the first time showing how many disability benefit claimants have died after having their benefits cut or stopped.

    In a speech on Monday, Duncan Smith is expected to claim that 2m more people are in work and that the number of workless households is at a record low following previous government reforms. “There is one area on which I believe we haven’t focused on enough – how work is good for your health. Work can help keep people healthy as well as help promote recovery if someone falls ill. So, it is right that we look at how the system supports people who are sick and helps them into work,” he is expected to say. “But we must not stop there. We need to be relentless in our efforts to get more people into work and off welfare,” he will say. “The number of disabled people working has risen by 350,000 over the past two years, the highest on record. Yet, even though we have got more disabled people into work, that is only the beginning.” According to a briefing, Duncan Smith will also announce new changes to the Fit For Work service and changes to access to mental health advice for claimants.

    Last week, the DWP admitted using made-up stories from fictional claimants to demonstrate the positive impact of benefit sanctions. A DWP leaflet featured one welfare claimant, “Sarah”, who said she was “really pleased” a cut to her benefits had encouraged her to improve her CV. But after a freedom of information request by the website Welfare Weekly, the DWP said they were not real claimants. The stories were for “illustrative purposes only”, it added.

    Under the sanctions system introduced by Duncan Smith, people can lose benefits for up to three years if they fail to meet the government’s requirements for jobseekers. Statistics showing how many people die while claiming out-of-work disability benefits will be published on Thursday. The information commissioner overruled attempts to withhold the statistics, originally requested by a campaigner using freedom of information laws. The DWP said it had always intended to publish them.

    In April, the commissioner asked the DWP to publish the number of claimants of incapacity benefit and employment and support allowance who had died between November 2011 and May 2014. The initial freedom of information request was sparked by concerns that disabled people were being declared fit for work, having their benefits stopped, and then dying. The prime minister, David Cameron, promised in June to publish the figures. The so-called disability gap is the difference between the employment rate for people with disabilities and those without. According to an analysis of figures from the Office for National Statistics by the disability charity Scope, 48% of disabled people are in employment, compared with 73% of the general population. However, disability rights activists have called for the government to do more to normalise perceptions of disabled people at work, rather than treating the situation as “a problem that needs to be explained away to employers”.

    A DWP spokesman declined to discuss the figures in Duncan Smith’s speech or release further details. A spokesman said: “This isn’t a policy announcement; it’s the start of a conversation.”

  • Row breaks out over benefit cuts 'suicide watch' claims
    The SNP and Labour have hit out over claims that frontline benefits staff are getting guidance on how to deal with claimants threatening suicide and that the advice has been given to Scottish Department for Work and Pensions staff.

    The SNP said it highlighted the "devastating impact" of benefit cuts and sanctions, while Labour said cuts were hitting the vulnerable. The DWP said staff can refer claimants for support and this was "nothing new". The guidelines for call centre staff are designed to help staff deal with unsuccessful applicants for Universal Credit who are threatening to self-harm or take their own life, the newspaper reported.

    'New approach' SNP MSP Dennis Robertson said: "The evidence reported today shows that there is a clear link between a person's income and their health and wellbeing - particularly their mental health. "That the UK government are issuing suicide guidance to their frontline staff is an acknowledgement by them of the devastating impact of their social security cuts on people's lives - it's not new guidance they need, it's a new approach." Labour's equality spokeswoman Jenny Marra said: "The Tory's welfare cuts have hit some of the most vulnerable people across Scotland - many who are struggling to find work and are suffering because of an unfair sanctions regime.

    "Government policies should not be pushing people into a position where they feel they have nothing left to live for." A DWP spokesman said: "As you would expect, our frontline staff have always been trained to look for signs of vulnerabilities. "They can refer individuals to specialist support - including specialist teams at Jobcentre Plus - and this is nothing new."

  • Vile Barclay brothers rag hail tory henchman IDS a hero (Ultra rich scum happy to see poorest peasants dying through austerity)
  • Vile Barclay brothers rag give murdering tory psycho platform to spout evil murderous agenda
  • Vile Harmsworth rag backs tory henchman IDS's murderous agenda
  • 76,000 signatures and counting: More Britons petition for arrest of Netanyahu VIDEO
    USA self-described socialist candidate emerges as front-runner in presidential vote VIDEO
    Shoreham Air Show, Sussex - Plane Crash VIDEO
    Bernie Sanders "Racism Remains A Much Too Real Part Of American Life" VIDEO
    ‘NSA put surveillance cone over Salt Lake City during 2002 Olympics without warrant’–fmr SLC mayor VIDEO
    Retracing Bangkok blast suspect's steps on cctv VIDEO
    Greek PM Alexis Tsipras resigns, announces early elections amid party rebellion VIDEO
    St Louis police chief defends Wednesday fatal shooting by cops VIDEO
    New Banksy 'Dismaland' theme park launch VIDEO
    Ashley Madison adultery site - UK GOVERNMENT email addresses?

  • Full UK government email address's here?
  • Did zionist leaning Noel Biderman set up Ashley Madison website to lure in those they wanted to trap?
  • Ashley Madison founder Noel Biderman's emails reveal he had multiple affairs despite his claims he never cheated on his wife
  • Of the more than 40,000 zip codes in the United States, there are ONLY THREE with zero registered Ashley Madison users
  • Oscar Pistorius' early release is blocked by justice minister VIDEO
    Mid air swimming pool proposed in London VIDEO
    North and South Korea 'exchange fire' VIDEO
    Trump shows his true colors on sympathy for the rogue murderous state of Israel(VIDEO)

    and total hatred for Iran who are the biggest supporters of Gaza's victims
    Surveillance video captures explosion at a Motel 6 in Bremerton, Washington VIDEO
    Cop brutality on one-legged black man 'after taking away his crutches' in San Francisco VIDEO

    The torturers and assassins who claim to be law enforcement
    American cops vs Poor Suckers VIDEO
    Jesse Ventura on Trump wanting to turn America into a walled community VIDEO
    Stockton cops firing 600+ shots was 'excessive' VIDEO
    Ex federal reserve chairman Ben Bernanke on American war profiteering VIDEO
    Michael Kaufman the male feminazi promoter who writes bile about heterosexual men VIDEO

  • Michael Kaufman the biggest male peddler of feminazi heterosexual male smear campaigns
  • Michael Kaufman instigator of the feminazi White Ribbon campaign against heterosexual men
  • The Feministing Five: Michael Kaufman
  • Refugee men in Scotland cajoled into feminazi White Ribbon agenda(VIDEO)
  • Diversity training or homosexual/lesbian propaganda? VIDEO

  • Why do the BBC select a homosexual to produce BBC Breakfast?(VIDEO)
  • Rare 'red sprite' shot taken by astronauts in the International Space Station
    Labour's tory mafia claim Corbyn is a lefty when in the 70's he'd have been in the middle VIDEO
    Jeremy Corbyn winds up tory toffs in 1984 VIDEO
    Who Is Worse For Britain - Blair Or Corbyn? VIDEO
    Putin plunges to the bottom of Black Sea in bathyscaphe VIDEO
    Israel preparing itself to face ICC VIDEO
    Tory assassins the DWP admits using 'fake' claimants in benefit sanctions leaflet
    Sanctions are pushing the mentally ill over the edge. Mass murder of the vulnerable by draconian psychological and financial torture.

    The Department for Work and Pensions has admitted using made-up stories from fictional claimants to demonstrate the positive impact of benefit sanctions.
    A DWP leaflet featured one welfare claimant, "Sarah", who said she was "really pleased" a cut to her benefits had encouraged her to improve her CV. But after a Freedom of Information request by website Welfare Weekly, the DWP said they were not real claimants. The stories were for "illustrative purposes only", it added.

    Under the sanctions system - introduced by Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith - people can lose benefits for anywhere between a few weeks and three years if they fail to meet the government's requirements for jobseekers. Stephen Timms, Labour's acting shadow work and pensions secretary, said: "You couldn't make it up - but it seems Iain Duncan Smith can. The only way he can find backers for his sanctions regime is by inventing them."

    The leaflet features the apparent stories of two sickness benefit claimants, Sarah and Zac.

    "Sarah" - whose story features alongside a woman's picture - says she failed to complete a CV despite agreeing to do so on her work "action plan". "I didn't have a good reason for not doing it and I was told I'd lose some of my payment. I decided to complete the CV and told my work coach," she says. Sarah says her benefits were cut for two weeks, but now she is "really pleased with how my CV looks" and it will really help her find a job.

    Zac, meanwhile, says he let his work coach know when he was going to miss a meeting and because he did so, "my benefit payment hasn't changed". According to Welfare Weekly, the response to its Freedom of Information request from the DWP said the images used were "stock photos and along with the names do not belong to real claimants". The DWP later said in a statement: "The case studies were used for illustrative purposes to help people understand how the benefit system works. They're based on conversations our staff have had with claimants. "They have now been removed to avoid confusion".

    The system of benefits sanctions - introduced under the coalition government - has been accused of having a detrimental impact on some claimants. Earlier this year, the Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee called for an independent inquiry into the way the sanctions were applied, saying that in some cases they were causing food poverty and "severe financial hardship".

    Mr Timms added: "Instead of fabricating quotes pretending the system is working, [Iain Duncan Smith] should scrap unfair sanctions targets for jobcentre staff and do more to protect vulnerable people from facing benefit sanctions."

  • Amazon's cut-throat corporate jungle VIDEO

  • Amazon fires back after scathing workplace critique(VIDEO)
  • A day in the life of a warehouse wage slave
  • Bangkok bomb: multiple casualties at Erewan shrine VIDEO
    UFO caught in the wake of RAF Vulcan bomber as it flew close to nuclear power plant VIDEO
    London could finally be rid of its oldest homosexual pub and 150 years of illegitimate debauchery VIDEO


    MI6 close to Royal Vauxhall Tavern and Dolphin Square the top homopaedo ring that operated there

  • Royal Vauxhall Tavern in south London is one of the capital's most notorious homosexual bars
  • Feminist extremism used to procure boys for the homopaedo legal mafia

    Heath with Thatcher and Janner with Blair

    Feminist extremism against men has been used by the zionist / freemason mafia through British courts to steal young boys into care during separation where ex wives are cajoled into making vile allegations against their ex-husbands in family courts, run by zionist / freemasons , imposing court orders that see thousands of boys being removed into care homes. That also provides vast pickings for the crooked lawyers running up huge legal aid bills on the back of horrific allegations against good fathers. James Muir a lawyer in Scotland who claimed nearly £2,000,000 in legal aid hung himself after being charged with "embellishing" claims in child welfare cases.

    Lord Janner a top jewish lawyer who was avoiding decades of homopaedo abuse, thanks to a zionist / freemason crown, used his position as a law lord to push for more homosexual friendly laws alongside Thatcher who had a whole glut of jewish lawyers and henchmen working for her in her cabinet, many who were later accused of abusing young boys. Now even her predecessor Edward Heath, a former tory prime minister, is embroiled in homopaedo abuse claims stretching back decades including his involvement in Haut de La Garenne in Jersey.

    It is becoming much clearer that the British establishment have been using these BLACKMAIL techniques to keep their political lackeys in check. Thatcher herself was an anomaly as she is maybe one of the few who wasn't thrown into a room with a young boy and filmed by Britain's secret services. MI5&6 run by zionist / freemasons to ensure their dim witted underlings did not falter in serving the top controller the royal mafia via their henchman the Duke of Kent who is responsible for hand picking all the top judges, cops and lawyers who ensure all of this is covered up. Or it had been until the internet gave their victims a platform that their complicit law society controlled mass media refused to provide.

  • Jewish lawyer Janner to face criminal proceedings over allegations of homopaedo abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s
  • Lord Janner told to attend court over homopaedo charges (Lawyers use mental health issues all the time to avoid answering for their own criminality)
  • Investigation into Edward Heath homopaedo abuse claims to go national
  • Retired cop exposes cover up of ex-Prime Minister Edward Heath's homopaedo abuses
  • Noel Edmonds claims the royal parasite and Margaret Thatcher conspired to cover up Jimmy Savile’s child abuse
  • VIP homopaedo ring 'abused teenage boy INSIDE Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle'
  • Royal parasites behind global spying at GCHQ and MI5(VIDEO)
  • Nick Clegg and David Cameron colluded in covering up homopaedo MP Cyril Smith's sexual and physical abuse of young boys (Homosexual / homopaedo agenda operating right inside the heart of government)
  • Two Scots in Thatcher gov Nicholas Fairbairn and Dr Alistair Smith accused of homopaedo abuse of boys
  • Margaret Thatcher 'personally covered up' for homopaedo senior ministers
  • Tory whistleblower: 'I supplied underage rent boys for Margaret Thatcher's cabinet ministers'
  • Tory homopaedo whistleblower: 'Margaret Thatcher knew all about underage sex ring among ministers'
  • Homopaedo's at Westminster changed the law to suit the homosexual agenda
  • Houses of Parliament a den of homopaedo's and their protectors
  • Have Britain's political party whips covered up the crimes of homopaedo politicians in order to exert political power?
  • £500,000 of taxpayers money went to fund homopaedo ring
  • Homopaedo's operate inside British Home Office
  • Britain's Home(opeado) Office
  • Liberal homopaedo MP Cyril Smith avoided prosecution thanks to the cops and crown
  • Clegg comments on Westminster homopaedo ring exposures
  • Clegg finally calls for probe into establishment cover up of homopaedo MP Smith
  • Establishment cover up of vile homopaedo liberal MP Cyril Smith
  • The rotting corpse of Libdems after Clegg kissed the tory arse one to many times (as well as complimenting their top predatory homopaedo Cyril Smith)
  • The rotting corpse of the Libdems will bring down their murdering partners in crime the tory mafia
  • British Home Office behind cover up of elite homopaedo network in the UK parliament
  • Now even Thatcher's henchman Tebbit admits to a cover up of high level paedo's at Westminster
  • If MPs have harboured paedo's, the damage to British democracy will be fatal says MP SIMON DANCZUK
  • Labour Lord's 'sex attacks on 12 young boys: 'Horrific' homopaedo allegations include rape and serious sexual assaults
  • New twist in Westminster scandal: 114 secret files on paedo cases missing, admits Government
  • Cameron forced to order fresh investigation into missing dossier detailing explosive claims of a Westminster homopaedo ring
  • How the (masonic)establishment hid the monster in their midst: As MPs demand an inquiry into the covering-up of a VIP child abuse ring, chilling proof of how this depraved diplomat was protected by the good and the great
  • Britain's homopaedo establishment used freemason cops and special branch to hide their sinister debauchery
  • Labour peer Barbara Castle drew up dossier on VIP homopaedo's
  • A lawyer James Muir "embellished" claims for legal aid in family court cases for £2 million accusing fathers of abusing their children later committed suicide after the police began investigating
  • Freemasons: Apemen posturing
    No one can truly comprehend the pathological madness of any man wanting to join a secret society that has a long history of some of the most vile abuses of their fellow men and the monstrous death and destruction across the globe.

    One thing definitely is true is that they are ape men posturing using a massive propaganda campaign that suggests subtly and deviously that THEY and not every other man that is not part of their satanic cult will protect women. Domestic violence as portrayed in THEIR compliant media paints a sinister picture of men constantly battering women and children and who deserve a state machine to bring a massive boot down on the face of men to protect those down trodden women when the exact opposite is the case .

    The state, run almost entirely through masonic infiltrators, requires to dominate non mason men and under the GUISE of protecting women they can destroy any competition that might eat into their vast plundering network that encircles the globe. This ensures men with the worst human traits get to eat out of the enormous trough that has accrued from the plundering of men through legal and political machinations and the brute force assured by the freemason thugs operating inside the police forces required to impose THEIR LAWS that they themselves are not required to adhere to.

    There is no bigger terrorist threat on the planet than the zionist controlled freemason network and where sinister figures like the Queen's loyal lord lieutenant the Duke of Kent creates the orders for their dim witted masonic lackeys to do all the dirty work required to keep them as the top NAZI despots on the planet. A stasi like secret force that ensures only the royals and their global army of subservient ape men (through blackmail control) can ring fence the world's wealth at the enormous expense of men and their families who wont be selling their soul to the devil any time soon.



    Join HERE. The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it includes fair reporting of men's issues. Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
    World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.


    mobile version statistics stats

    android app
    ipad app

    By Country
    New Zealand
    Saudi Arabia
    South Africa

    nick vujicic

    second wind cottages

    churches action for the homeless

    cure blindness

    dublin homeless

    dublin homeless


    New York homeless



    L.A. homeless




    expose corruption


    stop the nwo

    Full RSS feed
    rss feed

    Temporary fault on our news feed click here